or go to loveshriners.org right away to give. your gift shows you care. this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to all of you in the united states and around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. we'll start today's show at the u.s./mexican border. president trump has gone back and forth on what he wants to do with it. david frum and i have some diverse advice for him on getting immigration right. also, nato turned 70 this week and faces threats from both russia, and some would say, america. i'll talk to secretary-general jens stoltenberg about how he plans to counter these challenges.

and jacinda ardern's response to the massacre in christchurch has been widely praised. prime minister theresa may's leadership of britain through brexit has been widely panned. do women have a distinct and different leadership style? i'll ask the great tina brown. but first, here's my take. president trump's threat to close the u.s./mexico border has confused even his allies. >> we will close the damn border. we're going to give them a one-year warning, and if the drugs don't stop, or largely stop, we're going to put tariffs. and if that doesn't stop the drugs, we close the border. i don't think we'll ever have to close the border. i may shut it down at some point. >> but on the broader issue of legal immigration, trump seems to be shifting his position. in his 2019 state of the union address, the president declared -- >> i want people to come into

our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally. >> immigration hardliners did not take this well. but the president haas since reasserted the idea. the day after the state of the union, trump told reporters, i need people coming in because we need people to run the factories and plants and companies that are moving back in. and "politico" reported this week that jared kushner is quietly developing a proposal to increase legal immigration into the united states. if this is trump's new-and-improved immigration policy, the president might find his way to a powerful compromise. real crackdowns on illegal immigration coupled with reform and maybe actual increases in legal immigration. it also happens to be a smart policy idea. a new essay in the journal "international security" points out that by 2050, the united states is projected to be the only major world power with an

increase in its population. the authors tie this fact to more dynamic economic growth and also america's continued ability and willingness to play a major military and political role worldwide. the data on other major powers is striking. u.n. projections show that by 2050, china and russia will have a 20% drop in people of working age. germany's working-age population will drop by 17%. japan's by 29%. this will likely translate into slower growth, less economic vitality, and greater percivity on the world stage. america's working-age numbers are expected to rise by 12% in the same period. in fact, only three other major developed countries will see increases in their working-age cohort -- australia, canada, and britain. but all four countries enjoy this boost only because of immigration. china on track to be the greatest economic, political, and technological competitor to

the united states, faces a demographic challenge that is even more dire than has been previously anticipated. in 2018, china's birth rate fell to its lowest level since 1961, a year of widespread famine. it appears that the communist regime's efforts to reverse the nation's longstanding one-child policy have simply not worked. amid all the noise about immigration, it's easy to forget the big picture. immigration means a more robust economy. it usually means younger workers, which translates into greater dynamism and more innovation. remember, most nobel prizes are awarded to scientists for work they did when they were young. most companies are founded by people when they are young. if you look over the last two decades, many of america's crucial competitive advantages have been copied by the world to the point that other nations often do it newer and better. think of well-regulated market economics, technological

investments, infrastructure, mass education. so, what does america have left to truly distinguish itself? well, over the last half century, the u.s. has handled immigration better than most other countries. it takes in people from everywhere, assimilates them better, integrates them into the fabric of society, and is able to maintain an environment in which the new immigrants feel as invested as the old. this would probably be america's core competitive advantage in this century. for more, go to cnn.com/fareed, and read my "washington post" column this week. and let's get started. ♪ ♪ i wanted to talk more about immigration with the ever-sharp david frum, who wrote on the topic for "the atlantic." it is the cover story of the current issue. i don't agree with all of the

article, but that doesn't stop me from admiring it and its author. david joins me now. welcome back to the show. >> thank you so much, fareed. >> before we get to the article and the conclusions you come to, i want to ask you about the situation at the border right now. the asylum-seekers. help us understand the big picture. how should we think about asylum-seekers in today's world, in the united states? >> well, the laws about asylum grew up after world war ii with an eye to people who were fleeing nazi and communist persecution. these were treaties between nations and then laws within nations that said if you were the victim or the target of persecution by your state, you should get refuge in another country. but that system has evolved over the years to cover people who are not being persecuted as individuals and who are not being persecuted necessarily at all, who are victims of poverty or of crime. the people coming from central america are fleeing disorder in

their country. if that's grounds for asylum, there are hundreds of millions, if not billions of asylum-seekers. one of the things that americans need to keep in mind is the disorder in central america that initially drove some of the asylum-seeking is down by between half and 75% since its peak in 2013, thanks in part to the aid that president trump wants to cut off. this is very much a pull because of the dynamism of the american economy, people looking for work. and who can blame them for that? but it's nothing like the authors of the treaties after world war ii had in mind. >> explain, perhaps, the most controversial line in your cover story, where you say, if liberals insist that only fascists enforce borders -- i'm paraphrasing -- then voters will elect fascists to do just that, enforce borders. explain what you mean by that idea. >> well, one of the drivers of this story is that we have seen a rise of authoritarian populist

parties and rulers across the developed world. you've talked about this a lot. in hungary and in poland. the rise of authoritarian populist parties in germany, france. there's a government in italy that i think can be characterized that way. a lot of these feelings drove the brexit move in the united kingdom, and of course, helped to elect president donald trump. now, immigration is not the only cause of these movements or only source of their strength, but it's often the trigger. and in reaction to them, i think it has driven people who want to support liberal democratic institutions to take positions much more extreme on immigration than they themselves would have taken a decade ago. and we see that very much in the present democratic race. defending borders is a job that voters want done, and it's a job they should be able to count on normal politicians to do for them. but if the normal politicians won't, they'll turn to demagogues, because demagogues become demagogues, become successful by talking about things that people care about that no one else will address.

>> then let's get to the part of your article which i think i disagree with, which is you say that the united states should fairly dramatically reduce legal immigration. >> yes. you know, i think one of the things that we need to accept -- in your introduction, your take at the beginning of this is a good example of this -- immigration is not a binary question. it's not yes or no. it is how much and who. 70% of the legal immigrants who come to this country -- and you and i are both immigrants talking seriously about this issue, a job that americans won't do, apparently. 70%, almost, of the legal immigrants to the united states are coming because they are the relatives of somebody already here. only about 30% of the immigrants are coming because the united states economy needs them. so, first is a question of who you take, and second, how many. you need immigration at a minimum to keep your population stable, and you want to be able to recruit talent from around the planet. but you could do those things with the numbers that prevailed in the 1980s, where the legal numbers were about half, and

while enforcing effectively laws against illegal immigration, and while admitting genuine asylum-seekers but not allowing economic immigrants to rebrand themselves as asylum-seekers. >> let me ask you, i wonder, you've probably seen the kevin hassett chart which he did before he started to work for donald trump in the white house, where he points out that the united states' ratio of new immigrants to existing population is very low. it's the third lowest in the industrialized world, way lower than countries like germany, canada. and what that suggests to me is that, look, we are in a new world where these older, western, or industrialized countries need young workers. they need fresh blood. and we are going to have to take more immigrants, and there are going to be tensions and there is going to be a difficulty, and we have to figure out how to assimilate them better. but just looking back to the stability of the 1950s and saying, you know, that's -- if

we don't let immigrants in, we won't have any of these problems -- doesn't seem the solution. >> well, this points to the complexity, and often, the tragedy of this issue. you're not wrong about anything you say, but paradoxically, the economies that need immigrants the most are often the societies that can accommodate and adjust to them least well. kevin hassett is right, that relative to the stock of population, the flow of immigration today is less than it was, say at the late 19th century, but back then, because americans were having so many children of their own, even through the peak immigration years from 1880 to 1914, while the united states was taking more immigrants relative to population than it is now, the ratio of foreign-born people in the population was dropping because americans were having lots of children of their own. the united states in 2027 will exceed the peak of foreign-born people that it had in 1890 and it would go on rising under current policy forever. so, the answer isn't to stop it,

and the answer certainly isn't to say there's some other time we can take a time travel machine and return to. but what we do need to do is develop policies that work for where we are now. >> always interesting to hear from you, david frum. thank you so much. >> thank you. next on "gps," nato at 70, under pressure from the east, and some say, from the west, from putin and trump. i'll talk to the secretary-general, jens stoltenberg, when we come back. smile dad. i take medication for high blood pressure and cholesterol. but they might not be enough to protect my heart. adding bayer aspirin can further reduce the risk of another heart attack. because my second chance matters. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. it's a revolution in sleep. the sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999,

intelligently senses your movement and automatically adjusts... so you wake up rested and ready for anything. save $400 on select sleep number 360 smart beds. only for a limited time. we really pride ourselves >> ton making it easyautoglass, to get your windshield fixed. >> teacher: let's turn in your science papers. >> tech vo: this teacher always puts her students first. >> student: i did mine on volcanoes. >> teacher: you did?! oh, i can't wait to read it. >> tech vo: so when she had auto glass damage... she chose safelite. with safelite, she could see exactly when we'd be there. >> teacher: you must be pascal. >> tech: yes ma'am. >> tech vo: saving her time... [honk, honk] >> kids: bye! >> tech vo: ...so she can save the science project. >> kids: whoa! >> kids vo: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ ♪ book now and enjoy free unlimited open bar and more. norwegian cruise line. feel free.

plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology that captured carbon like trees we could help lower emissions. carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. that's why we're working on ways to improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪ i'm missing out on our family outings because i can't find a bladder leakage product that fits.

everything was too loose. but depend® fit-flex feels tailored to me. with a range of sizes for all body types. depend® fit-flex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit. nothing can prepare you tor hear those words... stage 2 breast cancer. i have three little kids. i can't have cancer. so we decided to travel to cancer treatment centers of america. dr. fernandez was wonderful. he said it was up to me to do what's best. it's about giving her options, where amy has all the information to make a decision that's best for her. we left on day one feeling like we're gonna beat this and this is the place that's gonna help us do it... that feeling is priceless. learn more at cancercenter.com. appointments available now. learn more at cancercenter.com. i never count trthe wrinkles.s. and i don't add up the years. but what i do count on, is staying happy and healthy. so, i add protein, vitamins and minerals to my diet with boost®. boost® high protein nutritional drink has 20 grams of protein, along with 26 essential vitamins and minerals

your body needs. all with guaranteed great taste. the upside- i'm just getting started. boost® high protein be up for life. for your enduring support, i thank you today. >> on wednesday, jens stoltenberg became the first ever nato secretary-general to address a joint meeting of congress. in the four prior years, only four people had addressed such meetings -- the pope, narendra modi, emmanuel macron and shinzo abe. the honor was granted to stoltenberg on the occasion of

nato's 70th anniversary, and it comes after a period of of the campaign trail, trump called nato obsolete. as president, he's complained that european members don't contribute enough to the cost. further, "the new york times," president trump privately said to aides on multiple occasions that he wanted to out of it. joining me now, nato secretary-general jens stoltenberg. welcome, sir. >> thank you so much. >> let me ask you about a report that was presented by douglas lilu in which saying after visiting nato countries across europe, he came to the conclusion -- and this is part of a study -- he came to the conclusion that the single greatest challenge to nato is the sense that the president of the united states is not committed to the alliance. >> well, president trump has stated again and again that he

is a strong supporter of nato. he did that again this week from the white house. he did that in the "state of the union" speech, and he did that when he met all the other nato leaders at the nato summit in brussels last july. and this commitment to nato is underpinned by actions, because opposite to what many people believe, the united states is not reducing their presence in europe, but actually, united states is increasing their military presence in europe. we have more troops, more exercises, more prepositioned equipment. so, united states is committed to nato in words and in deeds, and this is good for europe, but this is also good for united states, because a strong nato is also good for united states. and through nato, united states gets more friends and more allies than any other power, and that's important for the united states. >> let me ask you about the response to your speech and to

the anniversary from russia. they said that nato has had a record post cold war of continuous failure. it cited yugoslavia, afghanistan, iraq. and then the spokeswoman of the russian foreign minister said we would like to wish the alliance inner peace and less nervousness. we hope it avoids focusing on obsessions and phobias. do you think that there is a danger that nato is obsessing about russia? >> no, because nato is pursuing what we call a dual-track approach to russia. we have to be united. we have to be strong. we need the turns on defense to send the message to any potential adversary that if one ally is attacked, then the whole alliance will respond. this is basically the nato's core idea of all for one and one for all. then at the same time, we don't think there's any contradiction

between the terms of defense and dialogue. russia's our neighborhood. russia's here to stay, and we need to talk to russia, and we do talk to russia, partly to try to improve our relationship with russia, but also to manage a difficult relationship, to avoid incidents, accidents, miscalculations that can create really dangerous situations spiraled out of control. and therefore, we talked to russia also on these issues. and lastly, we need to talk to russia on arms control because russia is violating the inf treaty, deploying nuclear-capable missiles in violation of a cornerstone arms control treaty. >> let me ask you about the other threat to nato. people talk about president trump's lack of commitment to it, but across europe there is a new breed of leader that is emerging, populist leaders who are often not very committed to nato, sometimes quite pro-russian, sometimes against the european union.

how dangerous is that trend that we are seeing? >> nato is an alliance of 29 allies, different nations, different history, different geography, different political leaders. and yes, there are disagreements between nato allies on several issues, but we have had disagreements in nato before. the sudanese crisis in 1956 or withdrawal of france from the military cooperation in nato in 1966 or the iraq war in 2003. some allies strongly opposed that war. others were supporting it. the strength of nato is that despite all these differences, we have always been able to overcome them and unite around our core task to protect and defend each other. and i am confident that we were able to do that again. and yes, there are differences. as long as they remain unsolved, we need to make sure that nato allies stand together on

security and defense. and what we see now is that europe and north america are actually doing more together in nato than they've done for many years. so, i welcome the disagreements on trade, on climate, on all the issues resolved, but as long as they remain unsolved, we actually are able to deliver strong nato where nato allies are doing more together. >> it's a pleasure to have you on, sir. >> thank you so much. next on "gps," i'll take you to a country that i used to point to as an oasis of stability in the muslim world, a place where democracy and religion has coexisted peacefully, but it's a country that appears to be changing in a troubling way, when we come back. ults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis get clearer. and stay clearer. most patients who saw 90% clearer skin at 28 weeks stayed clearer through 48 weeks. tremfya® may lower your ability to fight infections and may increase your risk of infections. before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection

or have symptoms such as: fever, sweats, chills, muscle aches or cough. before starting tremfya® tell your doctor if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. tremfya®. stay clearer. janssen can help you explore cost support options.

not this john smith. or this john smith. or any of the other hundreds of john smiths that are humana medicare advantage members. no, it's this john smith. who we paired with a humana team member to help address his own specific health needs. at humana, we take a personal approach to your health, to provide care that's just as unique as you are. no matter what your name is. ♪

the latest no inisn't just a store.tys. it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome. now for our "what in the world" segment. the muslim world is too often plagued by dual threats -- extremism on the one hand, authoritarianism on the other. but the largest muslim-majority country in the world has long served as a rebuke to that narrative. i'm talking about indonesia, a country where muslim piety,

pluralism and democracy have coexisted for years. but things appear to be changing. a new politicized, hardline version of islam is gaining ground, catalyzed in part by the growing influence of saudi arabia and its money. that hardline strain has already taken its toll on the upcoming national elections this month, where the incumbent, joko widodo, faces a tough challenge. a moderate when he was elected in 2014, joko drew comparisons to president obama as a relative unknown who inspired hope. he is not the first choice for many islamist hardliners whose power is now ascended. there is no more revealing moment of their growing power than the largest protests in indonesian history. as journalist margaret scott writes in the new york review of books, the unrest lies in the re-election of gentleman kajaka

governor. ahok is also a christian. in a 2016 speech, he said that the koran does not require muslims to vote for muslim candidates. a report by the institute for policy analysis of conflict details how a diverse network of islamist groups pounced on this statement. they rallied their followers against him, accusing him of ridiculing their religion and demanding his arrest on charges of blasphemy. according to recently published research, preachers told their congregan congregants, support for ahok would bar their entry into heaven. organizers stoked resentment against the chinese, many of whom belong to indonesia's business class. the movement reached an apex in december of 2016, when more than 700,000 indonesians flooded the streets of jakarta. ahok was put on trial days later. it was a stunning moment in which the government, against 

its democratic principles, likely capitulated to growing religious intolerance. so, who was behind this massive display? one of the main organizers was baktia nasir, a saudi-educated activist with instagral followers who represents the new guard of conservative islam in asia. he and his allies support a puritanical variety of islam which has spread through with the help of saudi money. through schools and the media, the goal is to reform indonesian society for generations to come. in april 2017, ahok lost the elections. in may he was convicted of blasphemy and handed a two-year prison sentence. as scott notes, no matter what happens in the upcoming election, the protests transform politics. last year, joko picked as his running mate a conservative clerk who had played a critical role in the protests against ahok, the former governor.

but the protests also changed the public. before the agitation, 42% of indonesian muslims believed only muslims should hold political office. that's bad enough. last year, well after the protest died down, it was more than 54%, cording to the forthcoming research scott cites. what this shows is religion is emerging as a new fault line of identity politics in indonesia, says peter rumford of the interracial group. they've along been a model in the muslim world. these strengths threaten all of that. next on "gps," what would a world run by women look like? better than our current world run mostly by men? it's a provocative question that the great editor tina brown has been thinking about. i'll talk to her when we come back. ♪

♪ memories. what we deliver by delivering.

shouldn't mean going back to the doctoro just for a shot. with neulasta onpro patients get their day back... to be with family, or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17% to 1%, a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver neulasta the day after chemo and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing or allergic reactions to your doctor right away. in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect is bone and muscle ache.

ask your doctor about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card. now kayak and opentable let you earn travel rewards every time you dine. with just one reservation on opentable, you can start saving money on hotels with kayak. get started at kayak.com/diningrewards. i'with uncontrollederson who moderate-to-severe eczema, . or atopic dermatitis...

...you feel like you're itching all the time. and you never know how your skin will look. because deep within your skin... ...an overly sensitive immune system... ...could be the cause. so help heal your skin from within. with dupixent. dupixent is not a steroid,... ...and it continuously treats your eczema... ...even when you can't see it. at 16 weeks, nearly four times more patients taking dupixent saw clear or almost clear skin compared to those not taking it. ...and patients saw a significant reduction in itch. do not use if you are allergic to dupixent. serious allergic reactions can occur, including anaphylaxis, a severe reaction. tell your doctor if you have new or worsening eye problems, including eye pain or changes in vision. if you are taking asthma medicines, do not change or stop your asthma medicine without talking to your doctor. help heal your skin from within. ask your eczema specialist about dupixent. mr. speaker --

[ speaking foreign language ] peace be upon you, and peace be upon all of us. >> that was new zealand's prime minister, jacinda ardern, addressing parliament in the wake of last month's massacre in christchurch. her actions in the aftermath of the tragedy were widely praised in many quarters. under her leadership, gun legislation was drafted within days. ardern donned a hijab, vowed never to speak the name of the murderer and at the same time saying of the victims, many immigrants, "they are us." my next guest says ardern's leadership and her actions are indicative of a fact of life -- "women have evolved to deal with the intractable perplexities of life and find means of peaceful co-existence where men have traditionally found roads to conflict." tina brown was the editor of "vanity fair," "the new yorker" and "the daily beast" and is founder of women in the world, which holds its tenth annual summit next week.

welcome. >> good to be here, fareed. >> so, let me ask you about an act of what many regard as kind of typically male leadership in your country of origin, britain. the way in which brexit has been handled for a lot of people -- and this has come up in parliament, in commentaries on parliament -- feels like a lot of schoolboys jostling for power and attention. and in fact, many of the people, the key players in the torry party all went to the same college and in fact the same high school. they've all eaten at oxford and this comes up a lot in politics. >> it showed, frankly, because brexit only came about because feckless, upper-class men decided to hold their political, tactical issues by holding a referendum without any plan "b." then what had actually happened -- and they were stunned when it did -- another bunch of upper-class men all sort of fought over the spoils but completely messed it all up, leaving absolute chaos in their

country. and theresa may is, you know, was never meant to be the leader of england, you know. she was just the last one standing on what i think was the glass cliff of dover, you know? she really was. she was just left there, and so she took control. and unfortunately, has proved alas a very incompetent leader, but you can't really say she's the one to blame. they are. >> and may represents something i think you allude to in your article as well -- he does seem to come out of a very conservative party in a tradition where you have to as a woman sort of still act like a man, margaret thatcher, indira gandhi type of leadership. >> it's interesting. she's still of the generation that has been trying to all the time be appropriate and seem like a leader and be very reserved and unwilling to sort of talk about herself as a woman. but actually what we're seeing now is this new generation of leaders of which i think prime minister ardern is such a wonderful example, who are sort of owning their difference as women and really showing that there is such a thing as women's

wisdom, which was always something somewhat belittled, really in years gone by, because women were always sort of seen as lesser. women were always the caregivers, looking after the family, looking after the children. but of course, that's what gave them and has given them an ability to really delay gratification and to act like the grown-ups in the room. i would say that nancy pelosi, mother and grandmother, is an absolute example of that kind of power, with her muscular mind and her feminine flair and sort of maternal warmth. she's able to simply rally her caucus by saying, now, now, calm down. calm down. and she administers her committee time-outs and treats and she kind of gets everybody, like a broad of children, frankly. >> you know, frank fukuyama wrote an essay in "foreign affairs" many years ago called "what if women ruled the world?" and he argued there were biological and evolutionary biology that suggested that women were less competitive, less kind of mindlessly status-oriented, more social, that, you know, many of these things, as you say, described as

womenly virtues, were actually rooted in science. and you feel like that's borne out in reality now. >> well, i think it can be. you know, obviously, let's not forget there are some horror women as well. marine le pen is also a leader of her kind. so you know, i wouldn't say that women were -- you know, there weren't plenty of bad women leaders. but there is a moment now when we're all kind of tired of men circling the drain, you know, bully-boy politics, strong men rising, crass behavior. i think it's a moment when we're seeing a longing for a different way of being, of which jacinda ardern was an example. you know, two years ago, a year ago, she was just the young woman leader who had a child in office. now she's really become a global icon with this act of instantaneous leadership, which was very much a woman's warmth that came forward. >> what do you find -- you've now had ten years of this great women in the world conference. are you finding that women are now more comfortable talking

about these issues, wanting to have a different kind of leadership? you know, what are sort of the lessons you've learned? >> well, it's very interesting because the women we've had on our stage over the last ten years -- i mean, we've had 4,000 or 5,000 women, and they are activists, they are peacemakers, they are politicians. they have this great strength and this practicality, each one of them, that has just always been so impressive. and a kind of willingness to, perhaps because they don't have the conventional parts to power, to sort of break those molds and do something different. we had on our stage last year an australian sea captain who went off and rescued migrants in the mediterranean ocean. we had, you know, we've had felicia sanders, who was the mother of one of the children killed by dylann roof, you know, in that church. and she was so kind of out of it. she had brought this peaceful spirit of saying i want to use this experience to do things that are bringing people together, not breaking them apart. so i think there really is a

moment now for women. and you're seeing them winning elections. i mean, let's face it. we just saw the first female mayor of chicago, who's also black, who's also gay, who is really sort of blown up that whole political machine, and she's won as mayor of chicago, which is stunning. and the new president of slovakia, who is a 45-year-old former lawyer. and many of these women have never really been in politics before. it's as if there is a spirit abroad now since the election, you know, since hillary's loss, since me too, where women are really being pushed out, finally, to own their own power in a different way, you know? it's like they were all trying to cram themselves in that masculine nasa space suit, you know? and now they're wringing their own style to politics, and it's very exciting. >> tina brown, pleasure to have you on. >> thank you. >> the tenth annual women in the world summit starts wednesday. up next, michael lewis, the best-selling author, has a new way to get his brilliant thoughts into your brain, a podcast, and it's terrific.

i'll talk to him about it when we come back. this is not a bed... it's a revolution in sleep. the sleep number 360 smart bed, from $999... senses your movement and automatically adjusts on each side to keep you both comfortable. and snoring? how smart is that? smarter sleep. so you can come out swinging, maintain your inner focus, and wake up rested and ready for anything. sleep number is ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with mattresses by j. d. power. save $400 on select sleep number 360 smart beds. only for a limited time. smile dad. i take medication for high blood pressure and cholesterol. but they might not be enough to protect my heart. adding bayer aspirin can further reduce the risk of another heart attack. because my second chance matters. be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.

we really pride ourselves >> ton making it easyautoglass, to get your windshield fixed. >> teacher: let's turn in your science papers. >> tech vo: this teacher always puts her students first. >> student: i did mine on volcanoes. >> teacher: you did?! oh, i can't wait to read it. >> tech vo: so when she had auto glass damage...

she chose safelite. with safelite, she could see exactly when we'd be there. >> teacher: you must be pascal. >> tech: yes ma'am. >> tech vo: saving her time... [honk, honk] >> kids: bye! >> tech vo: ...so she can save the science project. >> kids: whoa! >> kids vo: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace ♪ oneeeee... did you try this one? feel this one. it's amazing! twooooo... it's nice. but it's kinda pricey. hi. hi. you can't skimp on a decision this important. a mattress is where you'll spend over half your life and eat all your meals. but it's all good. just use pay it plan it. pay it plan it is a payment feature from american express. choose a monthly plan to split up large purchases over time with no interest and a fixed fee. need me to help you carry this to your car or... the powerful backing of american express. don't live life without it.

america is under attack, not from a foreign power, but from within -- the institutions, norms and rules that have held up this country for more than two centuries are being assaulted on a daily basis. in many cases, it is the people and institutions that help to ensure fairness in america that have been taking the most incoming fire -- the referees, both the literal ones on the playing field, and figurative ones like the courts. that is the thesis of michael lewis' new podcast series called "against the rules."

lewis is, of course, the mega best-selling author of such books as "the blind side," "the big short," and "liars poker." michael, welcome. >> thanks for having me back, fareed. >> so, this all came to you because of your kids' sports. >> it started with that. it started as watching the appalling ways in which the parents behaved, treated the referees at my kids' sporting events. and it was just like the first thing -- the first point of curiosity was like, why would anybody do this job? but what really kind of lit a fire under the idea was the financial crisis. you look at the financial crisis, and it was clearly like a failure of the referee. and the refereeing failure all over the place. and that's where i started to kind of keep notes and sort of address the big question -- why at the same time that lots of americans have this sense that there's unfairness in the world, things are rigged, is this character who's there to ensure

fairness, kind of the neutral third party, under assault? and he is, most everywhere you look. >> and you know, part of it seems to be the feeling that americans have that that neutral third party isn't actually neutral, that the game is sort of stacked in some way. >> so, i think there are a few things going on. one is, in situations where there's real inequality, like, i don't know, consumer finance, where on one side you have big banks, on the other side you have lots of not-organized consumers. very hard to referee that situation because the powerful players put their fingers on the scale. they interfere with the ref. but there is this feeling in the air that, like, people can't be neutral. and it comes from a lot of different places, but just this notion that people are inherently biased. and it comes out of social science. and the book i wrote, "the undoing project," about two psychologists who explored the way that, you know, when people are making judgments, they make

systematic errors. all that work i think is filtered into the popular conscious and people don't really believe that human beings can play this role in a fair way. but what's remarkable is the solution to the problems of unfairness is to strengthen the referee. it's to strengthen the neutral third party. but there are all these forces that are sort of alive in the land to undermine the authority of the referee. i mean, you talk to judges, for example. we have an episode on judges. and they say, look, judicial independence is under assault here in a way it's really never been before. this isn't a case of, like, a totalitarian dictator saying, no, the courts aren't independent anymore, you'll do whatever the government says. it's sort of the twitter mob coming after a judge because they don't like a particular ruling, without any kind of contextualization of why the ruling was. it's investigation into judges' personal lives in ways that just

never happened before. in some cases, maybe for the better. but the point being that, like, the forces that are out there that might attack or undermine judicial authority are gaining all kinds of strength. there isn't any corresponding force to defend them. >> in telling the story about judges, you went to a strange place, uzbekistan. explain why. >> so, i didn't go to uzbekistan. the podcast went there. i talked to it. i wanted to just dramatize for an american audience just how valuable and how they should cherish this thing we have called judicial independence, because it doesn't exist every place, and in cultures that haven't had it, uzbekistan has never had it, they have never had a situation where with the judge could actually rule on the basis of the law. the judge was assigned a conclusion with the case, and the conclusion was if the prosecutors says you were guilty, you were guilty, so no

one is ever acquitted, and it isn't so that once you change the rules and now you say you're independent that the judges behave in an independent way, that that comes to them naturally. they have to learn the behavior. so if you lose it, the point is that if you lose this thing, the independence of the ref, the strength of the judge, of the referee, it's very hard to get it back. >> is there a solution to the culture of skepticism and cynicism about the referee? >> you know, it's a great question, like what do you do about it? one answer is there are places where technology will solve the problem. in sports, they have solved the problem of the strike zone in baseball by just essentially putting pitch track machine out there that measures the strike zone and forcing the umpire to conform to it. so that's one solution, but it's not a satisfying one, because in most of these places technology is not going to solve the problem. >> technology can give you the

objective answer with the instant replay, but there's a lot of life that is still a subjective call. >> yes. then you're thrown back on this is a question of cultural norms, of social norms. you need, for example, a political leader who will sell the importance of government regulation and have people understand it, and if -- if the positive case isn't made and understood, what you're going to have is, you know, all these little tragedies that result from an unfair system caused by the absence of a referee. >> michael lewis, always a pleasure. >> thanks for having me. >> we will be back. it had gone. we needed a second opinion. that's when our journey began with cancer treatment centers of america. one of our questions was, how are we going to address my liver? so my doctor said i think we can do both surgeries together. i loved that. now my health is good. these people are saints. ha, they're saints.

cancer treatment centers of america. appointments available now. -it's our confident forever plan. -welcome to our complete freedom plan. -it's all possible with a cfp professional. ♪ -find your certified financial planner™ professional at letsmakeaplan.org. now kayak and opentable filet you earn travel rewardsal every time you dine. earn points with each restaurant reservation on opentable and redeem them for hotel discounts on kayak. get started at kayak.com/diningrewards. with my bladder leakage, the products i've tried just didn't fit right. they were too loose. it's getting in the way of our camping trips. but with a range of sizes, depend® fit-flex is made for me. with a range of sizes for all body types,

depend® fit-flex underwear is guaranteed to be your best fit. for all body types, be right back. with moderate to severe crohn's disease, i was there, just not always where i needed to be. is she alright? i hope so. so i talked to my doctor about humira. i learned humira is for people who still have symptoms of crohn's disease after trying other medications. and the majority of people on humira saw significant symptom relief and many achieved remission in as little as 4 weeks. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira.

with humira, remission is possible.

all of you. how you live, what you love. that's what inspired us to create america's most advanced internet. internet that puts you in charge. that protects what's important. it handles everything, and reaches everywhere. this is beyond wifi, this is xfi. simple. easy. awesome. xfinity, the future of awesome.

we all know that america's tech giants often dominate conversation about the world's biggest companies, but we've learned something new about the competition this week and it brings me to my question. what is the world's most profitable company? apple, alibaba, exxon mobil or saudi aramco. stay tuned. we'll tell you the answer. my book of the week is kimberly claussen's "open." the progressive case for free trade and global capital. i wish every democratic candidate would read this book. it's a highly intelligence, fact-based defense of the virtues of an open, competitive economy and society. and now for the last look. 900 million voters, 10 million election officials, 1 million polling stations. this is the indian general election, the world's largest exercise in democracy. it will begin on thursday, and

in order to accommodate the gargantuan needs of the indian electorate it will take place in seven stages over six weeks. during that time, election workers will span out across the country carrying electronic voting machines to remote mountain villages and tiny water-logged islands. they will hike in the himalayan mountains, take boats through the mangroves and even ride elephants in unpaved forests all to ensure that every voter has access. you see, the lord dictates there be a polling place within two kilometers of every indian home. in 2009, a polling place was even set up in the forest of gujarat for a single voter. this will become one of the history's most expensive elections. estimates say candidates will spend a whopping $7 billion. now, indian often falls show of its liberal and democratic principles, but every five years the mammoth mechanics of its parliamentary election remind us just how much this country has

invested in democracy. the answer to my gps challenge is q, saudi ahramco. for the first time this week the oil giant shed a light on its secretive finances, revealing a profit of $111 billion last year. that's nearly double the next nearly profitable company in the world, apple which made $59 by theion. the state-owned company released this financial information prior to a bond sale. the deal will help distance ahramco from the whims of the i'm market. in 2016 the company's profits

were only $13 billion. their risks to success range from the rise of renewable energy and changing environmental regulations to geopolitical events like public unrest or terrorist attacks. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. happening now in the newsroom. >> you believe democrats will never see the president's tax returns? >> oh, no, never. >> we should not be in a situation where individual private tax returns are used for political purposes. >> plus -- >> the attorney general said there was no obstruction of justice, he decided that. mueller did not say that. >> you can commit complete betrails of the public interest without committing impeachable acts and the public ought to know that. >> the democratic party is infested with trump derangement syndrome and still cannot accept the fact he won the election. >> i don't regret calling out this president for what i consider deeply unethical and improper