i'm michael smerconish in philadelphia, 12 people died in virginia yesterday and my first reaction was to wonder whether to cover it. maybe that reveals a professional shortcoming in me, or perhaps it reflects the level of desensitizing that has taken place in america due to gun violence. probably a little of both. well, of course we won't ignore it. by now, you know the story, it's the usual, a disturbing gunman went into his workplace and killed coworkers leaving 12 dead. in the u.s., it's the deadliest attack since the november 2018 shooting at the borderline bar and grill, where another 12 people were killed. quick quiz, where was that? if you don't remember thousand oaks, california, i'm sure you're not alone. it's just another sign of how grown accustomed we've become.

and so today there will be grief. people will offer thoughts and prayers. then will come the outrage, a brief plea for gun control from politicians, a retort about mental health, agreement, not to mention the shooter's name, and then after the burials, we'll return to our daily routines and focus on how long the run of the jeopardy champion might last. nothing monumental will change. i threw in the towel after sandy hook. if the murder of 20 children didn't change anything, then nothing will because as we've shown time and again, we lack the collective will to fundamentally retrench from engrained notions of gun ownership in american society. we have a disproportionate number of weapons in this country, and not surprisingly an outsized amount of gun violence. and by the way, i offer these thoughts as a firearm owner, but

someone who decades ago quit the nra. and oh, how pleased i'd be to have my pessimism proven wrong. i want to know what you think, go to my web site right now and answer today's survey question, will america's gun problem ever change? joining me now is retired fbi supervisory special agent james galliano. it occurs to me that the status quo is most unfair to law enforcement, like the cops in virginia beach who had to engage in a gun battle with whomever this was. >> michael, your open was spot on and perfect, and look, there is not a simple panacea to solving this problem f. you mentioned all the complexities to, and you're also right, police officers in the 21st century right now have to be olympic athletes, they have to be mental health professionals, they are entering these situations, this term we

use now, this phraseology of active shooter in an information vacuum so when those responding officers showed up, they didn't know if this was a terrorist act, if it was a hate crime, if it was a domestic dispute, if it was workplace violence, they also didn't know what type of weapon the person or people were armed with. it really is a daunting task for law enforcement, and i wish on the congressional end we could get things figured out. unfortunately i just don't know unless we change a whole lot of things in this country, how we can fix it. we treasure our civil liberties here, and we certainly don't want to impose martial law and turn this into a police state. there's so many questions here, and i just don't know what answers are. >> i know we both just watched the presser and the information is still unfolding thus far, is there anything that strikes james gas being different about this case than the many others we discussed. >> a couple things jumped out at me. obviously we know the shooter was armed with a .45 caliber

pistol. i carried a .45 caliber pistol during my entire 25 years in the fbi. he was also armed with extended magazines, now between the period of 1994 and 2004, during the assault weapons period, you could not buy, you could not purchase extended magazines, so what does that mean? that means a .45 is either chambered for seven rounds in a magazine, one in the barrel or if it's a double stack magazine, fourteen in one. this would probably add 10, 12, 15 extra rounds and he was armed with a number of them. the second thing that jumped out was the fact that he had a suppresser on his weapon. people sometimes call it a silencer, that's not what it does. it muffles the sound of the pistol rapport. when you hear something like this, run, hide, fight, tell in that order. the responding law enforcement and the people that we're attachi teaching this to, they probably didn't have a good idea what

this was until the police showed up and exchanged gunfire where people could understand this was a gunfight going on. that was an interesting piece that we have not seen of recent and i say of recent, in the last 20 years post columbine in an active shooter situation, michael. >> james, the chief at the presser spoke of the physical and psychological toll taken on investigators made me think of what the overnight must have been like for that forensic crew that had to go floor by floor through that building. >> yeah. so michael, we know that in the 21st century, we work these things as a collaboration, so the virginia beach police will obviously have assistance from the virginia state police as well as the fbi. they sent a number of technicians. we call them evidence response team members to come down from quantico down to virginia beach, it's a couple hours drive and to pain sta painstakingly work this crime scene and having been on the inside of the police tape on a

number of gruesome crime scenes, i cannot fathom, even having seen this for myself, what these folks are going through. these are husbands and wives and fathers and mothers and children, and people that showed up and if you looked at the pictures of the 12 beautiful innocent souls who were taken, they were old and young, they were black, white, and brown. they were male and female. they were us. and that must have been difficult beyond, i mean, i can't even put this into terms, into words, the folks that responded to this scene will need counselling and assistance, and i'm sure they're going to get some afterwards. >> well done, james, thank you as always. >> you got it, mike. >> what are your thoughts, tweet me at smerconish, go to my facebook page, i will read some responses throughout the course of the program. what do we have thus far. it's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. okay. great we can continue to have this dialogue, and debate, and we'll argue. you see what i mean. it's not a gun problem, it's a people problem. it's not a gun issue, it's a mental health issue. it's all of the above, and i'm

sorry to be so damn pessimistic, i don't see it changing in my lifetime. one more if we have time for it. thoughts and prayers is all politicians will do. it's a part of the response. thoughts and prayers today, agreement about we're not going to say the guy's name, et cetera, et cetera, and back to jeopardy, hey, did holzhauer win last night, how much did he win, answer this survey question. cannot wait to see the result, will america's gun problem ever change. still to come, the first debates kick off this month, how do you fit 23 candidates on one stage, by splitting them in half and having two debates, but who gets to go versus whom, chair tom perez is here to explain the selection process and how he hopes in the field might fall. plus, all else aside because of the booming economy and other

factors, if you run the economic numbers on president trump for 2020, he seems headed to a landslide victory. discover card. hi, do you have a travel card? we do! the discover it® miles card. earn unlimited 1.5 miles on every purchase, plus we'll match your miles at the end of your first year. you'll match my miles? yeah! mile for mile! and no blackout dates or annual fee. nice! i was thinking about taking a scuba diving trip! i love that. or maybe go surfing... or not. ok. maybe somewhere else. maybe a petting zoo. can't go wrong. can't get eaten. earn miles. we'll match 'em at the end of your first year. plus no annual fee or blackouts. the discover it® miles card.

copdso, to breathe better,the. i started with anoro. ♪ go your own way copd tries to say, "go this way." i say, "i'll go my own way" with anoro. ♪ go your own way once-daily anoro contains two medicines called bronchodilators that work together to significantly improve lung function all day and all night. anoro is not for asthma. it contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. the risk is unknown in copd. anoro won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition, high blood pressure, glaucoma, prostate, bladder or urinary problems. these may worsen with anoro. call your doctor if you have worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes or eye pain while taking anoro. ask your doctor about once-daily anoro

to start treating your copd. ♪ go your own way save at anoro.com. high protein. low sugar. tastes great! high protein. low sugar. so good! high protein. low sugar. mmmm, birthday cake! pure protein. the best combination for every fitness routine. so, every day, we put our latest technology and unrivaled network to work. the united states postal service makes more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country. e-commerce deliveries to homes do your asthma symptoms ever hold you back? about 50% of people with severe asthma have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. eosinophils are a key cause of severe asthma. fasenra is designed to target and remove these cells. fasenra is an add-on injection for people 12 and up with asthma driven by eosinophils.

fasenra is not a rescue medicine or for other eosinophilic conditions. fasenra is proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, improve breathing, and can lower oral steroid use. fasenra may cause allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. haven't you missed enough? ask an asthma specialist about fasenra. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. to save 30% on all the medications we carry. so go directly to petmeds.com now. the first democratic debate

this month and with 23 candidates vig for t candidates vying for the stage, how are they going to divvy it up for the two nights, who faces whom, and what's the plan, joining me to discuss is dnc chair, tom perez. mr. secretary, this is like herding cats, give me the joef view of t -- overview of the approach. >> i'm happy to do that. i want to thank you for the first ten minutes of the show. i have been reflecting on your question, will things change, i fear the answer is no. it will be a matter of days or weeks before the next shooting because we lack the will to do something about it, and in the long run, that's what elections are about, and we're going to fight like heck, and unfortunately everything we do in the u.s. house of representatives meets a graveyard in the united states senate. we're going to keep fighting like heck. >> i want to say something too. tweets and facebook comments and i don't see them in advance, i was kicking myself during the

commercial break because we posted a comment where somebody said we have a people problem and all through the commercial break, i'm beating myself up saying, what i should have said is we don't have a monopoly on bad people in this country. we don't have a monopoly on mental health issues in this country, we have a gun problem in this country. that's what i wanted to say to that guy. you get the final word, then we'll talk debates. >> absolutely. we can do something about this problem if we muster the will to take on the nra and that's what we're going to do. it's not going to happen in the short run. that's why we have elections, that's why i'm at the dnc. to build an america where we can be safe, you should be able to go to work and come home safe and sound. i am grieving for those remarkable public servants. i worked in local government. those people don't get rich. but they are great public servants and now they have lost their lives and there are some who are fighting for their lives. that is wrong and i'm going to

work like hell over the course of my career in public service to make sure we change this because we can do something about this, and we're going to continue to try like hell to do it. >> okay. all right. on the debates, let me now go to the issue i really wanted to raise, one of my colleagues here, he made an observation about the rules for debates three and four, which seem to prioritize large grass root donor bases and he wonders whether in the end, isn't it who has the most money, and who has the most money on hand, are you sure you have the right metrics is my question? >> well, we haven't changed the rules of our methodology, what we have done throughout michael is to make sure that we're creating a really inclusive process. you can't win the presidency in the modern era if you can't build relationships with the grass roots. and that's why we set forth an unprecedented set of ways to get to the debate stage. you can either get there through

the polling threshold or you can get there through grass roots fundraising. 65,000 donors are what we set for the first, and it turns out there's dgoing to be something like 14 or 15 or over a dozen who are going to reach that threshold, and the next two debates, you have to get to 130,000, which means if you've gotten to 70,000 by the first debate, you have 60,000 to go. and the more proficient you are at grass roots fundraising, the cheaper it is, and so i think it's really important for us to make sure the grass roots can be part of the process. i don't think you can win the presidency as a democratic if you can't connect with the grass roots, so we're very proud of what we've put together. we spoke to a ton of people, got their input and again, the proof is in the pudding, candidates have done a very good job in the aggregate of reaching the grass roots and i think that's going to help us as a party, michael, in the long run. >> here's something that i worry about.

in the end, a candidate in the first, second, third, is only really going to get 7 to 10 minutes of speaking time. this is going to sound crazy. hear me out on this, wouldn't you like to see a march madness type of model, i don't mean with elimination but some toe-to-toe, beto and biden, klobuchar and kamala. i'm sure cnn would give the time up for two people to go at it once for 30 minutes, and another two people, and continue to mix up the lot. what do you think of that? >> well, what i think is that we have a remarkably large field, and i think that is a first class challenge to have, and what we have set up and we have worked together in the networks, including cnn and they have been great partners is a structure where we want to give everyone a fair shake to communicate their vision to the american people. if history is a guide, there are going to be breakthrough moments in the upcoming debates where people who are currently maybe at 1% have that breakthrough

moment, and then things happen over the course of the next few months, and so what i think we have set up is a process that gives everybody not one but two bites at the apple to communicate their vision to the american people and then what we've done, and we said this all along, that in the fall, we're going to raise the threshold because that's what we always do. you have to demonstrate that you're making progress, and 2%, you know, is hardly a high bar in my judgment. if you've already gotten 70 or 80,000 grass roots donors, then you're over halfway to the mountain top on that as well, and i'm confident that we're going to see great debates and nobody is going to be talking about hand size, michael, we're going to be talking about health care and climate and the issue and reducing gun violence, and the issues that matter most to people, and i think this process that we have set forth, 24 people running for president, 23 aren't going to make it to the mountain top. my goal is to make sure that all of those candidates and their

supporters feel like they got a fair shake so that next spring when we have our nominee, they can hit the ground running. >> final question, when and how will you decide who stands on the stage with whom, if it's going to be ten and ten for the first two nights, who gets to go side by side with the others. >> june 12th will be the last date that you qualify for, so within 48 hours, june 14th or so, we will have made this selection and our goal was random selection. our goal is not to have a varsity, jv match up and so we outlined exactly what we do. let's say 20 people qualify by june 14th, we will know what the order will be. what we do know is it will be two nights in a row, and there would be ten the first night, ten the second night, and i'm confident that these debates are going to get a lot of viewing, both in june, and in july when we're with cnn.

i think these are the most important debates we have seen. >> think about my march madness idea. i'm serious about it. i don't mean with elimination. i just mean so we can look at two candidates on the stage at once. thank you, mr. secretary, i appreciate it. >> have a great day. >> i want to remind you to answer the survey question, will america's gun problem ever change. a lot of people are beefing, why did you word it as a gun problem. i did it deliberately, i wrote it. two rivals jockey for position, is donald trump on track to win a landslide in 2020. economic signs point to yes. 'm . today's senior living communities have never been better, with amazing amenities like movie theaters, exercise rooms and swimming pools, public cafes, bars and bistros even pet care services. and there's never been an easier way to get great advice. a place for mom is a free service that pairs you with a local advisor to help you sort through your options and find a perfect place.

a place for mom. you know your family we know senior living. together we'll make the right choice. since my dvt blood clot i was thinking... could there be another around the corner? or could it turn out differently? i wanted to help protect myself. my doctor recommended eliquis. eliquis is proven to treat and help prevent another dvt or pe blood clot... almost 98 percent of patients on eliquis didn't experience another. ...and eliquis has significantly less major bleeding than the standard treatment. eliquis is fda approved and has both. don't stop eliquis unless your doctor tells you to. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. if you had a spinal injection while on eliquis call your doctor right away if you have tingling, numbness, or muscle weakness. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily... and it may take longer than usual for bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical

or dental procedures. what's around the corner could be surprising. ask your doctor about eliquis. through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business. from finding out what's selling best... to managing your fleet... to collaborating remotely with your teams. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence.

as scandal and countless investigations swirl around the trump administration in washington, the economy may be the president's saving grace. according to dozens of models, the booming u.s. economy all but solidifies a landslide victory for president trump in 2020. in every single one, trump wins. this makes rush limbaugh, for one, pretty happy. >> and there's other polling data out there today, including three supposed experts at modeling future elections, turnouts and all that, computer models, and all three of these guys are left wing types, and they all three are -- in fact, one of them has 12 different models and trump wins them all. reelection. >> joining me now, the chief economist at moody's analytics, mark zandy who has analyzed 12 models.

my first question is are you now or have you ever been a member of the communist party? >> that's the first i've heard of that, michael. that's pretty comical. no, i'm not a comy, and i've never been a comy, i'm an american. >> what did you do here? give us the overview. >> yeah, so this is a model. so we look at historical voting patterns. the model is based at the state level to account for the electoral college. it includes economic variables, things like unemployment, changes in gas prices, house prices and also political variables, things like the president's approval rating, previous voting patterns, the benefit of incumbency, lots of different factors, of course we test the model based on how well it has done historically. but, you know, i should say, the model is predicting, these models are predicting trump

would win if the election were held today, not 18 months from now. there's a lot of economic script to be written between now and then, and things almost certainly will change. the models are only as good as of today. >> okay. so as not to repeat the mistake of pollsters in the last cycle, do you look at things nationally, ie popular vote or state by state? >> state by state. so state by state, and actually it's quite interesting, i mean if you look at it, it's intuitive, pennsylvania where i live, and i think you live in pennsylvania as well, philadelphia, that is the most swing state. it's right on the bubble, and actually if you look at the counties within the state and we actually model at a county level, the real battle is around philadelphia and the philadelphia suburbs, that's where the swingest of swing votes are and that's going to be key, and one other really important point michael, it's about turnout. these models don't account for turnout. they implicitly assume the turnout is equal to the average turnout since 1980s the data

we're using. if democrats turn out at high levels, say at the levels that prevailed in the 2008 election, the first obama election, then, in fact, the d candidate would win, even with the good economy. it's really going to be very important for d's to turn out in big numbers if they want to win this election. if the economy is good 12 to 18 months from now. >> is it fair to say that without the economy, if the economy should take a turn for the worst, then your models would all say that he's done, in other words, you're showing him in the best of circumstances according to the economic numbers. >> yeah, that's exactly right. nationally, we have 3.6% unemployment rate, that's a 50 year low. what really matters is 12, 18 months from now, what is the unemployment rate, is it rising or is it falling, if it's rising even from a low level, he's got a problem economically, and if the democrats turn out in large numbers, if they're really charged up, feels like they are,

then these models will show something very different. it will show d wins, not trump. >> you know, the president has, i'll say it this way, an outsized personality which helps him with his base, and harms him with his detractors, that's really what's offsetting your data. let me say it more simply, anybody else with these economic numbers i think mark zandy would be going much further saying the guy is a shoe in. >> yeah, you got that exactly right. i mean, all the political factors, you know, favor him. he's an incumbent, right, an incumbent after their first turn running again has an advantage. the way the electoral college is set up, that is an advantage to him. the one thing that's not working for him politically is his approval rating. we use the gallop poll for the approval numbers, is relatively high, about as high as it's been since he has been president. then you throw on this economy, particularly what's going on in the job market, low

unemployment, that gives him a lot of tail winds and that's why he wins. despite all of that, despite the great economy, you know, it's not a slam dunk. one other thing, michael, i should point out, these are models and models are wrong and we saw that in 2016. the models that now are predicting trump would win are the same models that predicted clinton would win back in 2016, so you have to take this with that in mind. >> got it. if we had had this conversation before the last cycle, you would have been speaking about hillary, you comy based left wing type. >> you got it. yep, yep. >> mark, thank you, appreciate it. >> thank you. take care. check in on your tweet and facebook comments, what do we have, katherine? for who, people like me, middle class have to look for second jobs to be able to make it. marisol, you know, i hear that from individuals who are on my radio program running focus groups. richard vague is one of them who

has come on and said, you know, when he's conducting focus groups, yes, people are employed, but they're holding two jobs just to make sure that they're able to pay for that which they need, and they're still concerned about how they're going to be able to afford health insurance. i get your point. i want to remind everybody, answer the survey question at smerconish.com, do it now, okay. will america's gun problem, my words, ever change? . still to come, in deciding not to charge the president with obstruction, robert mueller made his own interpretation of the law, well, who voted for that. it's time for our memorial day sale on the sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days to save $1000 on the new queen sleep number 360 special edition smart bed, only $1,799. ends sunday. you wouldn't accept an incomplete job from any one else. why accept it from your allergy pills? flonase sensimist relieves all your worst symptoms, including nasal congestion, which most pills don't. and all from a gentle mist

you can barely feel. flonase sensimist. hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams. mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology

that captured carbon like trees we could help lower emissions. carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. that's why we're working on ways to improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪ moving? that's harder now because of psoriatic arthritis. but you're still moved by moments like this. don't let psoriatic arthritis take them away. taltz reduces joint pain and stiffness and helps stop the progression of joint damage. for people with moderate to severe psoriasis, 90% saw significant improvement. taltz even gives you a chance at completely clear skin. don't use if you're allergic to taltz. before starting, you should be checked for tuberculosis. taltz may increase risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection, symptoms, or received a vaccine or plan to. inflammatory bowel disease can happen with taltz, including worsening of symptoms. serious allergic reactions can occur. for all the things that move you.

ask your doctor about taltz. but we're also a company that controls hiv, fights cancer, repairs shattered bones, relieves depression, restores heart rhythms, helps you back from strokes, and keeps you healthy your whole life. from the day you're born we never stop taking care of you. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth...

are you in good hands? so attorney general bill barr thinks that special counsel robert mueller could have reached a decision on whether the president committed obstruction. guess what, he's right, and his assessment only reinforces my long standing belief that something's missing regarding the mueller report. accountability. in two critical instances, monumental decisions were made by individuals, not answerable to the people. the first had its roots in 1973 when in the midst of the water gate information, robert dixon, then the head of the office of legal council, the olc within the justice department. he's the one that wrote an opinion concluding that the president cannot be indicted in office. the burden of a criminal case would hinder the executive branch from quote accomplishing

its constitutional functions. that opinion has never been tested in court. although in 1997, the supreme court did allow a civil suit to proceed against president clinton, and it has long been debated by legal scholars, in 1974, it was rejected in a memo from the staff of the watergate special counsel, leon jawarsky, they argued nixon could be indicted in office. the policy against a sitting president was reaffirmed but in 2017, a long hidden memo came to light after "the new york times" filed a freedom of information act request and caused its release from the national archives. it revealed that a law professor named ronald rotunda then working as a consultant for ken starr reached a different conclusion, quote, it is proper, constitutional and legal for a federal grand jury to indict a sitting president for serious criminal acts that are not part

of and are contrary to the president's official duties. in this country, no one, even president clinton is above the law. okay. enter robert mueller. mueller abided by the olc policy and its logic. his report said this, quote, a federal criminal accusation against a sitting president would place burdens on the president's capacity to govern. he chose not to render a conclusion on obstruction of justice overlooking that a special counsel is to provide the attorney general with a report quote explaining the prosecution or declination decisions the special counsel reached. well he didn't do that. mueller went one step further. mueller claimed it would be unfair to establish a criminal case against a president in office where there would be no trial where the president could seek exoneration. that's why he made no finding on obstruction of justice. the report it said this, quote

fairness concerns counselled against potentially reaching that judgment when no charges can be brought. the problem that i have is that neither robert dixon, the original author of the justice department olc policy nor robert mueller who took the policy one step further were acting pursuant to an express provision of the constitution or edict of the congress. both were singularly setting policy with no accountability to the people. the olc guideline is not a constitutional provision. it's not a statute. it's not a regulation. it's subject to change by the mere stroke of a pen at the doj. and that's what i think needs to change. if it's the will of the people that a sitting president cannot be indicted, then congress ought to pass a law saying so. before acting congress might want to first consider that the president has no such protection against being charged by a state, and that if we were to expressly offer the american president protection while in

office, we'd be an outlier. consider israel, where prime minister benjamin netanyahu is preparing for a preindictment hearing in the early fall. why? because israel has no prohibition against indicting a sitting prime minister. plus, the idea that a sitting president would be incapacitated by facing trial in office that's belied by president trump himself. while he currently faces no charges and hence no trial, according to "time" he's nevertheless the subject of more than a dozen other investigations and lawsuits looking into him, his businesses, his family and his associates. that doesn't seem to have interrupted his ability to function. as a matter of fact, he seems to thrive on it. bringing accountability to this process is not a republican, not a democratic idea, it's just the right thing to do. joining me now is neil kinkof, he worked in the office of legal counsel from 1993 to 1997. he testified against william

barr's nomination for the senate judiciary committee this past january and is currently a constitutional law professor at georgia state university. do you think it's settled policy that olc guideline? >> it's settled justice department policy but you're quite right, it is not a settled legal proposition. no court has ever endorsed the position and there are strong arguments to be made on the other side, so it's settled within the justice department but it is not a settled rule of constitutional law. >> do you think that robert mueller was obligated to follow the olc guideline? yes, he's a justice department employee and he was obligated to follow it. now, he may have asked for it to be reconsidered and i think that would be an interesting line of questioning if he testifies before congress, whether he asked that question, because part of the mueller report in the part where it considers obstruction of justice, the constitutional theory that the president can commit obstruction

of justice is intentioned with the theory that the president cannot be indicted or prosecuted. and so it would have made sense for him to have run that question up the chain and it would be interesting to know what he was told if he did. >> look, you're a smart guy, a constitutional scholar, you worked in olc, like the rest of us, you have been watching what's just unfolded, explain it to me. >> so i think the real key to understanding this is ken starr. right, when ken starr issued his report, he was virtually foaming at the mouth for bill clinton's impeachment, and he really undermined the credibility of the investigation by his partisan behavior. i think robert mueller wants to do everything he can to avoid that kind of spectacle, and to avoid that kind of legacy. and so instead what he's done is to lay out the facts, and to leave it to congress to decide whether or not to proceed with

impeachment. which i should add is the theory of the olc memos from dixon in '73 and from randy moss in 2000. >> the problem that i have with mueller's approach, by the way, i regard him as a patriot, i appreciate the way in which he undertook this task, i think he went a step too far with this fairness notion because he seems to have teed it up for the congress without reaching a conclusion and i agree with bill barr, that there was nothing that precluded mueller from reaching a conclusion on obstruction, not to bring an indictment but to reach a conclusion and provide additional guidance to the congress. do you agree with that? >> i agree with you that he could have, but the theory of the olc memo is that to indict a sitting president puts a cloud over the office. for a special counsel to say that the president committed obstruction of justice would put a cloud over the office. i don't think there's anything

unconstitutional about that but the theory of the olc memo is that it is unconstitutional. so i think mueller could have. i understand why he didn't. i think at this point, though, it's very much incumbent upon congress to take up that question, and i think in addition to the fairness point, mueller placed a lot of weight on not wanting to preempt congress's process, and that process is supposed to be informed by judgment made by politically accountable actors. and mueller is not that. >> but in mueller's effort to play it down the middle, i think he left this war shack test that we saw unfold this week that people were reading into his nine or so minute presser whatever they wanted to, and i don't think that it moved the needle either way as a result. you get the final word. >> okay. i completely agree with you. i think he has left us in a position where supporters of the president continue to say

untruthfully, but continue to say no obstruction, no collusion. and those of us who read the report and the facts in the report see that that's just a lie. >> professor, thanks for your time, and expertise, we appreciate it. >> my pleasure. >> let's check in on your tweets and facebook comments. what do we have, katherine, from twitter, i think. anyone who still can't see trump is unfit for office is either uninformed or unfit as a human being. c.mao, the standard is high crimes and misdemeanors, unfitness is subjective, and i think it gets resolved in the next election what people think, not in an impeachment process but we'll see. look, the pitch i'm making here is simply this. do we want to have a standard where a sitting president cannot be indicted while in office, and if that's the case, then congress ought to make it the law because this is not a settled issue among legal scholars. i don't consider myself one, but

i did a lot of reading on the subject this week, and that ken starr memo is really illuminating. they didn't buy into it. still to come, it's commencement season, so what are this year's speakers telling graduates about to take on the world. here's what actress viola davis said at barnard. all your memories and experiences, even if they were traumatic, own it. own it. the world is broken because we're broken. there are too many of us who want to forget who said that all of who you are has to be good, all of who you are is who you are. so many of them are full of this complicated, tricky language about their network and offers and blah blah blah. look. sprint's going to do things differently. and let you decide for yourself. they're offering a new 100% total satisfaction guarantee.

try it out and see the savings. if you don't love it, get your money back. see? simple. now sprint's unlimited plan comes with one of the newest phones included for just $35 a month. so switch now. for people with hearing loss, visit sprintrelay.com

it's commencement time. i didn't give a speech this year, but i have in the past three, so i always like to pay attention to what others choose to say as they send graduates off into the world. here's a look at some of the messaging of 2019. the mantra of oprah winfrey at

colorado college. >> everything is always working out for me. that's my mantra. make it yours. everything is always working out for me. because it is and it has and it will continue to be as you forge and discover your own path. >> apple ceo tim cook's think different advice at tulane. >> steer your ship into the choppy seas, look for the rough spots, the problems that seem too big. the complexities that other people are content to work around, it's in those places that you will find your purpose. >> president trump spoke thursday at the air force academy. he shook each of the cadet's 1,000 hands. he also conveyed a message of

forgiveness. >> a few cadets are still on restriction for pranks and other fairly bad mischief, you know what i'm talking about, right? and you all know who you are. so keeping with tradition, and as your commander in chief, i hereby absolve and pardon all cadets serving restrictions and confinements and that you earned. you earned it. so you're all on even footing. is that nice? >> democrat stacey abrams who ran a close race for georgia governor last year had this bipartisan message for the students at american university school of public affairs in washington. >> beyond the easy labels of party and ideology, are the deeply held convictions that shape those labels. but too often adherence to

conservative or progressive, to liberal or moderate, to democrat or republican or independent, to being pro this or anti that becomes an excuse for lazy thinking and for today i urge you to set aside your labels and explore what your principles say about the world you wish to serve. >> here's hoping graduates can take in these well-meaning words as they find their way in the world. best wishes to all. still to come, your final chance to vote on the survey question is now at senator con-ish.com. will america's gun problem ever change? with pure protein. high protein. low sugar. tastes great! high protein. low sugar. so good! high protein. low sugar. mmmm, birthday cake! pure protein. the best combination for every fitness routine.

has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. ♪ hi, do you have a travel card? we do! the discover it® miles card.

earn unlimited 1.5 miles on every purchase, plus we'll match your miles at the end of your first year. you'll match my miles? yeah! mile for mile! and no blackout dates or annual fee. nice! i was thinking about taking a scuba diving trip! i love that. or maybe go surfing... or not. ok. maybe somewhere else. maybe a petting zoo. can't go wrong. can't get eaten. earn miles. we'll match 'em at the end of your first year. plus no annual fee or blackouts. the discover it® miles card. wearing powerful sunscreen? yes! neutrogena® ultra sheer. unbeatable protection helps prevent early skin aging and skin cancer with a clean feel. the best for your skin. ultra sheer®. neutrogena®.

the latest inisn't just a store.ty it's a save more with a new kind of wireless network store. it's a look what your wifi can do now store. a get your questions answered by awesome experts store. it's a now there's one store that connects your life like never before store. the xfinity store is here. and it's simple, easy, awesome.

so how did you vote on the survey question at smerconish.com? america's gun problem, will it ever change? survey says 10,567 votes cast. unfortunately, sadly, we, the noes, have it. 73% say no. here's hoping that we are all wrong. those of us who constitute the 73%. what came in in social media this week, catherine? what have we got? throwing in the towel after sandy hook is the saddest commentary of all. everybody needs to stay engaged on the issue of guns. yeah, i hate to say it, susan. i mean, in coming in to the stud to deliv studio to deliver the program today, i said, how much attention do we pay to virginia? the saddest commentary of all,

eight so damn said yet it's another story and nothing will change. next one. what have we got? i think if someone were brave enough to show pictures of the carnage complete with victims there would be a better chance of changed our gun laws, sounds awful but seeing is believable, nitro girl. you know what else, nitro girl, letting nih take a look at this program, because it is a problem. that would be a healthy step in the right direction. give me another one. mueller gave the report to his boss to make the conclusion and he did. no obstruction. gypsy dave, no. no. his job -- i mean, look at the plain text of what his role was. he was to reporter to the attorney general in a confidential style, manner, his decisions regarding prosecution and declination. it was a binary choice that he faced, and he did neither.

he punted. at a minimum i think robert mueller should have told us if that was his philosophy from the outset, if from the get-go he intended -- remember, not until march 5 did bill barr decide there would be no indictment. i'll be in denver in parker, colorado, on june 23rd. see you next week. see a thicker-looking lash fringe in just 4 weeks. over 10,000 women tried it and love it. my husband has noticed a difference. i really love lash serum. try new lash serum solution. from l'oreal paris. eh, not enough fiber... chocolate would be good... snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress

sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movement and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days to save $1000 on the new queen sleep number 360 special edition smart bed, only $1,799. ends sunday. pnc bank has technology to help a pnc business line of credit, because sometimes inner peace requires a little external soundproofing. or pnc total auto. a place online to easily find and finance the right car for you. and your passengers. or pnc home insight, to search for a new house within your budget. hopefully with a grass yard. pnc - make today the day.

hi. maria ramirez! mom! maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams.

not this john smith. or this john smith. or any of the other hundreds of john smiths that are humana medicare advantage members. no, it's this john smith. who we paired with a humana team member to help address his own specific health needs. at humana, we take a personal approach to your health, to provide care that's just as unique as you are. no matter what your name is. ♪ no matter what your name is. plants capture co2. what if other kinds of plants captured it too? if these industrial plants had technology that captured carbon like trees we could help lower emissions. carbon capture is important technology - and experts agree. that's why we're working on ways to improve it. so plants... can be a little more... like plants. ♪

good morning. i'm victor blackwell, leading cnn's special live coverage of the tragedy in virginia beach. christi paul is in atlanta with the rest of today's news. let me tell you what's happening right now here in virginia beach. there is a vigil at the regal cinemas in the city to remember those 12 victims of yesterday's shooting at the virginia beach municipal center. we'll have more on the victims