>> i'd hold my mom's hand while we were singing and move it back and forth as though we were dancing, having a ball. ♪ if that's all there is, let's break out the booze and have a ball ♪ ♪ if that's all there is >> every time it ended my mom would say, isn't that marvelous. she'd be smiling, and it was. with her, with my mom, it was marvelous. good night. i want to turn it over to chris for "cuomo primetime." chris? >> anderson, thank you so much for sharing what is so hard to be shared. i know it means so much to so

many, and i hope it means a lot to you as well. you are our best and for good reason. all right, everybody. i'm chris cuomo. welcome to "primetime." here's the proposition. if it's clear to the u.s. military that briefed the president that iran intentionally shot down a u.s. drone then why is this president saying he thinks it was a mistake? what is the truth? the house intelligence chairman is with us tonight. he was just at a classified briefing with the president hours ago about this incident. we need him for that. and to make sense of the just received full hope hicks transcript that is now in our hands. the stonewalling is clear 155 times over. does yesterday's fiasco change chairman schiff's reckoning of what needs to happen next? and does joe biden have a problem in his party or not? we're going to ask a long time member of the congressional black caucus. there's a lot to figure out tonight so let's get after it.

all right. so this president says that the united states will not stand for the downing of one of our drones over international waters, but he's also apparently choosing to describe what happened as a mistake. well, which is it, and is the difference relevant to the response? house intel chair adam schiff was among the senior members of congress briefed today in the white house situation room. he joins us now. chairman, it's great to have you on "primetime" tonight with such pressing news matters before us all. you had an important briefing today. coming out of this, do you have any question as to whether or not iran intentionally shot down a u.s. drone? >> well, iran certainly shot down the drone. whether this was an intentional act by the top leadership or not is not something that i can really comment on. but i can say that we need to be working with our allies. there's been an attack now on an

american aircraft. there's been an attack on international shipping. there have been multiple provocative and dangerous acts by iran, so we should be working with our allies to de-escalate the situation, to deter this conduct, yes, but also to make sure that this doesn't end up in an unintentional conflict and escalation. so we need to figure out a strategy to de-escalate, to deter this kind of conduct, to protect shipping, to protect our aircraft. and i think most significant as this is an attack on many nations, it ought to be an international response. we shouldn't allow iran to drive us away from our allies. >> do you think that iran knew what it was shooting at? the reason i ask is there were a couple of different messages from the iranian authorities. one of them said basically we did it. they came into our space, so we did it. we're going to go to the u.n. and prove the u.s. is lying about where it was. all right, so that's an admission as far as i'm concerned and that it wasn't a

mistake. it was intentional. and then you have another iranian official who's saying we communicated with the aircraft, we told it where it was. it almost suggests as if they thought there might be somebody in this, that it wasn't a drone, and that might be a very different proposition. >> yeah, i don't know whether we have great clarity on whether iran knew what it was shooting at in terms of whether it was a manned or unmanned aircraft. i don't know the answer to that question, but, you know, certainly this is a provocation by iran, an attack on our aircraft, an attack on shipping belonging to other nations. and i think there's no question that iran has chosen these acts of belligerence partly to divide us from our allies, partly to get out from under economic pressure and lash out at the united states in particular but also to drive up oil prices. and it does call for us to think

strategically about this, not to take actions that play into iranian hands but at the same time that we protect the right of navigation. >> so what do you make of the president's response saying that, well, maybe it was a mistake and indicating he's in no rush to return fire in this situation? do you think that's the right call? what do you think the way is forward? >> well, look, we don't want war here. i don't think iran wants war here, and the big risk that neither nation wanting a war nonetheless ends up in a war because of miscalculations. so it's very important that our response, the international response be a cohesive one and that we take whatever steps have the least risk of escalating the situation. so i hope that's the approach that the white house takes. there have been indications that the white house has been at odds with itself, that the president, for example, is reported to have tried to do a diplomatic

approach through the japanese prime minister to reenter negotiations, but at precisely that moment it appears that bolton was announcing new sanctions on iran. now, that's a conflicting message that i think would leave anyone confused. what are you really trying here? are you making diplomatic overture, or are you trying to put the screws to us? so i think we need a more coherent policy out of the administration. but first and foremost we need one that deescalates the situation. >> and of course pulling out the iran deal blows up the coalition you did have. >> chris, that's exactly right. we can't ignore the fact the situation we're in now was imminently predictable. if we caused other nations to once again impose sanctions on iran, we shouldn't be surprised iran is going to leave the deal and go back to enriching or get these increased tensions or likelihood of conflict.

that step plus the designation of the rgc as a terrorist group is predictable, that iran would lash out on that decision as well. >> under the guise of ratcheting up conflicts and tension we get to what happened yesterday which i call a fiasco because it seems to be a pretty clear indication of where this is headed in this particular procedural method, that you've got 155 times the lawyer said she couldn't answer. you had a smatter of i don't recalls that were keenly germane in terms of revealing anything that might have been damaging. did it change anything you heard in that hearing yesterday, your reckoning of what the best way is forward? >> you know, chris, we had hope hicks before the intel committee about a year or so ago. she came before the judiciary committee so i wasn't there for the hearing today or the interview i guess yesterday.

i'm not surprised -- i don't think anyone is surprised the white house is stonewalling in such a comprehensive fashion. they're going to lose in court. they have no leg to stand upon, and the cases that have gone to court so far they've been losing. but clearly they trying to draw this out as long as possible. i think frankly hope hicks gives us a really good test case because their stonewalling has been so dramatic and so unsupported by law. so, you know, we have to take this first step to see if we can get answers under subpoena, and if we can't, then we go forward and we prosecute the case in court. so i think it's necessary, and yes, it's i think frustrating, and it is also dangerous in terms of a system of checks of balances that the administration would take us down this path. but congress is really left with no choice except to litigate to make sure we get answers. >> or to start an impeachment inquiry, maximize your powers and see where it goes from there. >> we could start an impeachment inquiry. that doesn't get us to court quicker.

it does improve our argument i think respecting grand jury material to some degree. i don't know that's much of an issue in terms of hope hicks' testimony. but again whether it's part of an impeachment proceeding or oversight we're doing now, either way we end up in court and either way they're going to try to run the clock. and we're going to try to press this as fast as we possibly can. >> so chairman, you have a proposed bill that is really straightforward, that the campaign committees and different agents within the different campaigns need to sign on that they understand in as broad a definition of understanding as possible, you can't let foreign powers interfere in the election and in your campaign. it's pretty straightforward. it's something you would think everybody agrees with. you change one definition to just include parenthetically that it's anything that could be used for political advantage in terms of what defines value. what's the chance you get any

buy-in from republicans on this bill as simple as it is? >> i think the reality is with many bills like this, we're already looking at our post-watergate reforms. we're putting forward bills. i introduced one earlier to curb the abuse of the pardon power. and this bill would curb the use of getting foreign assistance. there aren't many americans willing to put their name out there, risk an angry tweet or being criticized by fox prime time, but they will support these probably once donald trump is out of the oval office because i think they understand as we do that what the president did in the last election, what he threatens to do in the next one is so destructive of our democracy to be inviting foreign intervention this way. so i don't know how much support, bipartisan support we'll get today. but i think we will see these kind of bills pass when it's no longer a risk to members to support them, that president trump is going to come down on them. >> it is amazing how the fear of

consequences overwhelming good conscience in congress right now. chairman, so important to you have you on the show in these important moments. >> great to be on, chris. thank you. >> hopefully everybody's on the same page that the situation with iran does not get any worse for our country. but even if there is no war, this conflict could wind up being a real problem for this president. in fact, it could do more than the mueller report ever even threatened. i'll lay out why next. calling all sunscreen haters. you're gonna love this. new coppertone sport clear. not thick, not hot, not messy, just clear, cool, protected. coppertone sport clear. proven to protect.

fits skin tone and texture. maybelline new york. in 2 finishes: matte and poreless and dewy and smooth. 64 fits. ♪ fit me! foundation. only from maybelline new york. available at walmart. the first survivor of ais out there.sease and the alzheimer's association is going to make it happen. but we won't get there without you. visit alz.org to join the fight. but allstate actually helps you drive safely... with drivewise. it lets you know when you go too fast... ...and brake too hard. with feedback to help you drive safer. giving you the power to actually lower your cost. unfortunately, it can't do anything about that. now that you know the truth... are you in good hands?

my copd medicine... ...that's why i've got the power of 1 2 3 medicines with trelegy. the only fda-approved 3-in-1 copd treatment . ♪trelegy. ♪the power of 1-2-3. ♪trelegy 1-2-3 trelegy. with trelegy and the power of 1 2 3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works 3 ways to... ...open airways,... ...keep them open... ...and reduce inflammation... ...for 24 hours of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling ...problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1 2 3. ♪trelegy 1-2-3 save at trelegy.com

with huge savings-- like bass pro flag chairs for under $10 each. and this stars and stripes tailgate toss game for under $30. now with free 2 day shipping. the president by all indications does not seem to want war with iran. good. but this situation which is largely of his own making could pose the biggest threat to a second term for him.

what we're living now is exactly why people warned him not to play politics with the iran deal. but he did it anyway, and he did it to prove a political point. >> the united states will withdraw from the iran nuclear deal. this disastrous deal, a great embarrassment to me as a citizen. this horrible one-sided deal. >> he got to flex his tough, snub obama and play up his fictional deal-making powers. now it is all coming back to haunt him in more ways than he may realize or be able to handle. here's how. the tanker ship attacks, the drone hit, it's all going down near the strait of hormuz, okay? more than a quarter of the world's liquefied natural gas and almost 20% of oil goes through there. so now there's instability, you know what's going to happen,

right? crude oil prices, just jumping 5.8% just from that. trump likes to take credit for lower gas prices, right? well, iran could force him now to own a spike. and no economic metric resonates like gas prices. a chance of a spike is even higher because of the china tariff trade gamble. so we heard the fed chair say he already has concerns because of that. a spike in oil prices could roil markets, and gas prices could boil voters blood. and the combination could shake economic stability what potus is going to lean on, and iran also poses a challenge to the second main measure of stability for this president, existence of a threat abroad. in this case iran could easily be argued as a situation this president created when he didn't have to. he alienated allies we now need. he had no diplomatic team that could handle it, and it all shines a light on perceived ineptitude. secretary of state mike pompeo a smart guy. but not that tied into the

players in this region. the national security advisor bolton is a known hawk. trump doesn't cotton to that. the generals around him that gave so many people comfort are all gone. iran also makes the fact it's been almost seven months since we had a senate confirmed secretary of defense or a u.n. ambassador. that all now looms larger. >> but i sort of like acting. gives me more flexibility. do you understand that? i like acting. >> now, he likes acting. now the question is going to be has he been acting as somebody who can handle a situation like this? it puts the president of a position of undoing his own damage with them and the rest of us when it comes to getting us to trust what he says and what the intel community says. remember he's been saying for so long they can't be trusted. this is the moment he was warned about. everyone says we need an international response. the team that did the iran deal was basically spat on by this

allies no,w presents a problem. many said to not trust and frankly not like this president. and it will all go back to the move he made against the advice of allies and those who knew better -- don't get out of the iran deal without a plan "b." a promise of a self-proclaimed master dealmaker has utterly failed to even get started. god forbid the situation moves beyond saber rattling. i don't know why anybody would want to see that. i don't get why his friends on fox are screaming for him to muscle up against iran. it shows a real dysfunction of their political thinking. but in times of trouble americans do look to the oval office if not for wild strength, a steady hand, smarts, stability, strategy. ingredients in short supply in this administration, and that's why iran presents a bigger threat on more levels than mueller ever did.

so in that thicket of what-ifs, i planted the seeds of what our next guests can feed for us. we need to get the military and political options and risks at play right now. we have two people who have lived this situation for many years. we'll be right back with that. on a john deere x300 series mower. because seasons change but true character doesn't. wow, you've outdone yourself this time. hey, what're neighbors for? it's beautiful. run with us. search "john deere x300" for more. yesss, i'm doing it all. the water. the exercise. the fiber. month after month, and i still have belly pain and recurring constipation. so i asked my doctor what else i could do, and i said yesss to linzess. linzess treats adults with ibs with constipation or chronic constipation. linzess is not a laxative, it works differently. it helps relieve belly pain and lets you have

more frequent and complete bowel movements. do not give linzess to children less than 6, and it should not be given to children 6 to less than 18, it may harm them. do not take linzess if you have a bowel blockage. get immediate help if you develop unusual or severe stomach pain, especially with bloody or black stools. the most common side effect is diarrhea, sometimes severe. if it's severe, stop taking linzess and call your doctor right away. other side effects include gas, stomach area pain, and swelling. i'm still doing it all. the water. the exercise. the fiber. and i said yesss to linzess for help with belly pain and recurring constipation. ask your doctor. that i won the "best of" i casweepstakes it. and i get to be in this geico commercial? let's do the eyebrows first, just tease it a little. slather it all over, don't hold back. well, the squirrels followed me all the way out to california! and there's a very strange badger staring at me... no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on my car insurance with geico. uh-huh, where's the camel? "mr. big shot's" got his own trailer. ♪

wheeeeeee! believe it! geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. welcome to our lounge. enjoy your stay. thanks very much. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ find calm in over 1,000 airport lounges worldwide. it's another way we've got your back. the business platinum card from american express. don't do business without it. behr presents: a job well done. painting be done... and stay done. behr, ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with interior paints. great paint, new low price. starting at $24.98. exclusively at the home depot. [ text notification now that you have] new dr. scholl's massaging gel advanced insoles with softer, bouncier gel waves, you'll move over 10% more than before.

dr. scholl's. born to move. hey! i live on my own now! i've got xfinity, because i like to live life in the fast lane. unlike my parents. you rambling about xfinity again? you're so cute when you get excited...

anyways... i've got their app right here, i can troubleshoot. i can schedule a time for them to call me back, it's great! you have our number programmed in? ya i don't even know your phone anymore... excuse me?! what? i don't know your phone number. aw well. he doesn't know our phone number! you have our fax number, obviously... today's xfinity service. simple. easy. awesome. i'll pass. all right, someone taught me once it's no time for bluster situations like this. it's time to muster your best political and military thought. and that's what we're doing tonight. here's who we have for you. aaron david miller.

he's served republican and democratic administrations as a mideast analyst and negotiator at the state department. he has been tutoring me and the rest of us, if you read his pieces, about the risks of exactly something like this. now a distinguished fellow at the wilson center. great to have him for the diplomatic political piece of this. and to help break down at the wall here what is at stake, what are the options, retired major general spider marks. gentlemen, welcome to "primetime." general, let me start with you. the idea of all of this happening in the last segment i spelled out this is going to be bad economically. it puts pressure on the certainty of oil and gas flowing through here, but the disconnect of the united states military and intel saying they did it, they meant to do it, they knew what they were doing and they shouldn't have done it and the president saying maybe it was a mistake, that's got to be his own play, right? because clearly that's not what they're telling him. >> no, absolutely.

the military and intelligence community quite clearly are stating that the drone was in international airspace when it was struck down. i guess what the president is -- and i can't get into the president's mind, but i assume what he's trying to say is speak in measured tones. which is, look, i'm not going to be provocative, i'm not going to go to war and let's pray that's the case. a kinetic war and full war in iran is absolutely not what we want to try to achieve here. and provoking iran has obvious consequences. we should not be surprised with iran's activities in the gulf of oman, in the straits and activities going through both. >> all right, so this a string of a recent pattern, right? we got it up for you here. what do you see in these attacks? do you see coordination? do you think this is opportunistic or a message? >> it's not opportunistic at all. it is a message. it's clearly planned out. and the notion as the president said, this might have been a mistake, clearly having spent my life in the military, large

organizations, stuff happens and the boss doesn't necessarily know about it and you go oh, my god, what happened here. >> but you don't get an official from iran coming out afterwards you shouldn't have been there, we're not going to take it, and we're going to the u.n. to tell them you lied about where it was and another official came out and basically echoed that statement. they're not saying it was a mistake. >> not only is an arm of the military by the irgc exists within all the elements of governance in iran. i'm skeptical that was a mistake. the intelligence in saying it was very clear, they went after the drone. and so i see this as a series of events of iran trying to change the narrative. look, diplomacy is starting to work a little bit. sanctions are starting to strangle tehran quite considerably. we should not be surprised if they're lashing out a doing it kinetically in that military element of power.

this is very predictable. >> but they can't want us to come at them. obviously they understand the capabilities of the u.s. military. what's the plus minus for you in terms of if you were to do something back to them of what that could be or what it should be? >> a clear option on the table that is probably being discussed right now is a very narrow very narrowly described specific strike against the battery that took out that drone. that would be very limited. it would be on iran, going through iranian airspace, but it would be a legitimate symmetric response. you took out our drone, we're going to take out that element that took out that drone. we could up the ante in terms of sanctions. i don't know what that would look like. in other words, come at them a little bit more asymmetrically, we don't have to make this a tit for tat type of dance, but we could start to apply additional pressure on iran telling them with a very clear message we're not going to stand for this. this aircraft was in international space.

you can't come after us. we're going to ratchet this up a little bit. >> all right, so those are the military basic pieces going on here. obviously you weigh in on everything else as you want. but, aaron, let me bring you in. what do you think iran wants by doing what it just did? >> you know, i think the supreme leader wants no peace, no negotiations on one hand, and no major military confrontation on the other. i think in 2020, '21 he'd like to see a new president here. and a new president in iran. and elections are in 2020 and i think he'd like to see president rouhani associated with the jcpoa agreement leave, replaced by someone much more manageable and flexible to the supreme leader's point of view. in the meantime i think the iranians are trying to remind the president that the campaign of maximum pressure can be reciprocal. i strikes me, chris, this campaign is working all too well. we have really crushed -- the administration has crushed the iranian economy reducing,

cutting in half its oil imports, sanctioning its iranian revolutionary guard and all of their economic interests. but i think what the administration never banked on, never counted on is that the adversary has a vote, and the fact is we have preponderance of military force, but in an asymmetrical conflict you can restrict oil flow, you can raise insurance premiums. you can rattle the cages of american allies, and you can force mr. trump into a strike, and i think -- i think the iranians are prepared for some kind of american retaliation -- >> thank god by every indication we have of this president to the extent he can be at all consistent, he does not believe there's a win in most military steps america has taken in recent history. hopefully he sticks by that because none of us really want to see that. but, aaron, you warned me about this when he got out of the deal.

you said he doesn't understand, nobody is telling him how this works, you just pissed our your allies, the very same people he's going to have to turn to. do you think that's where we're headed? >> i do. and i think we all need to take a deep breath because this is going to get worse before it gets worse. what the administration has done -- and i worked for rnds and voted for rnds. this is part of a pattern. the president and administration comes up with solutions to problems, frankly, that we don't have. and in the process makes the problems we do have much worse. the jcpoa was flawed but still highly functional. >> the iran deal. >> the iran deal. if you want to get out, fine. but have a strategy. also find a way to engage. if you don't like the terms of the agreement, sit down and let's negotiate. the only way out of this short of sustained confrontation, chris, is to start talking to

the iranians rather than about them. and the fact is i don't think right now the iranians want to talk. >> and we haven't put the teams together to do that overtime. pompeo by all different accounts is a very capable man, intelligent, but not somebody who's been embedded in that region. he doesn't have those kind of relationships. he's had his son-in-law running around trying to figure out middle east peace. and now you have a really complex situation on. that's why i needed your minds tonight. as we get more information, stick by your phone, aaron. general, you know i've called on you for years. both of you, frankly. as we learn more about this we're going to have to understand the options. and goodwilling it doesn't get any worse. general, thank you. aaron, thank you. all right, joe biden, totally different kind of problem. nowhere near as existential as anything like what we're talking about now, but, you know, we have to get to the bottom of how deep in the soup is biden. we hear he tried to smooth things over with cory booker. well, is that about making peace or about stopping someone who's

playing to advantage? we saw him with don lemon last night. he sees opportunity in himself for this, righteous opportunity. so let's bring in a long time congressional black caucus member. what's the bottom line of what's going on with this? and a member of the foreign committee, what does he think about what's happening in iran? what does he want to see, what does he not want to see? perfect guest, next. iles card. earn unlimited 1.5 miles and we'll match it at the end of your first year. nice! i'm thinking about a scuba diving trip. woman: ooh! (gasp) or not. you okay? yeah, no, i'm good. earn miles. we'll match 'em at the end of your first year. yeah, no, i'm good. so chantix can help you quit slow turkey.rkey.

along with support, chantix is proven to help you quit. with chantix you can keep smoking at first and ease into quitting. chantix reduces the urge so when the day arrives, you'll be more ready to kiss cigarettes goodbye. when you try to quit smoking, with or without chantix, you may have nicotine withdrawal symptoms. stop chantix and get help right away if you have changes in behavior or thinking, aggression, hostility, depressed mood, suicidal thoughts or actions, seizures, new or worse heart or blood vessel problems, sleepwalking, or life-threatening allergic and skin reactions. decrease alcohol use. use caution driving or operating machinery. tell your doctor if you've had mental health problems. the most common side effect is nausea. quit smoking slow turkey. talk to your doctor about chantix.

you know those butterflies aren't actually in the room? hey, that baker lady's on tv again. she's not a baker. she wears that apron to sell insurance. nobody knows why. she's the progressive insurance lady. they cover pets if your owner gets into a car accident. covers us with what? you got me. [ scoffs ] she's an insurance lady. and i suppose this baker sells insurance, too? progressive protects your pets like you do. you can see "the secret life of pets 2" only in theaters.

all right, so the former vp, biden, called his 2020 rival cory booker last night to address his controversial remarks. and, you know, tried to make peace about working with two segregationist senators. apparently the two didn't exchange any apologies. are they necessary? does this have lasting effect? today booker's campaign renewed his stance. quote, cory believes that vice president biden should take responsibility for what he said and apologize to those who were hurt. for whom if anyone should an apology come from, how much does this matter? here to discuss is democratic congressman greg meeks. great to have you here, sir. i want to get into the politics. it matters.

it does not matter to me as much as round, havre. so because you have an important voice on the foreign affairs committee, what do you want to see here in terms of coordination with the white house, and how should this be looked at going forward? >> well, i couldn't agree more with what your initial statements were. number one, i think before there is any offensive attack or anything about going to war the president should come to congress. congress is the one that can declare war and the only one that should be able to authorize it. so i hope this president does not try to do anything as he has been doing with everything else to go around congress and come to us. >> senator rubio, he said, hey, the constitution says and even the war powers act which he then argued might not be constitutional, when the u.s. has attacked the president can respond. but isn't that about imminent threat to national security or interests, and would this qualify? >> exactly. i do not believe this will qualify, and i think we're still looking at the facts to try to figure out where exactly the

drone was, which territory. unfortunately, this administration does have a credibility problem. you know, i'm listening and waiting to hear from our allies. they've been very quiet on this. i am concerned about this being a united states versus iran conflict. it should be where we're working with our allies as we did when we came up with the nuclear agreement in regards to iran. and to put that kind of pressure so that when and if iran was to violate any of the terms of the agreement or anything of that nature, it would not just be the united states, it would be all of us together. so here's a problem that was created by the president that everyone knew as you perfectly articulated at the opening of the show, that now we have to live by. and it is dangerous. any kind of mistake could be catastrophic on one side, misinterpreting the other side. it is not a scenario that puts me at ease particularly as you said, again, the generals are gone and you know that mr.

bolton, this has been his thing. he's wanted to go and attack iran for years. so i am very concerned and very nervous. it is a critical matter of which we've got to keep our response on, and i think those of us in congress we have to keep our eyes open and be very vocal and demand the administration communicates with us directly. >> well, you never know. maybe the combination of this presenting huge risk to this president, which i'm sure he's aware of and he does have a natural reticence for military action, maybe it'll make his reach out to congress. and when he does, hopefully you guys can put things aside and work for the best result to this situation. let me tell you what's happening inside the party now. do you believe joe biden has something to apologize for? do you believe that these knocks on his busing stance, the '94 bill and now his statements about working with segregationist reveal he is out

of step with where your party is today in terms of dealing with issues of race? >> no, i don't. i think you take certain things in its time. i think joe biden is a good and decent human being who his intent and, you know, when you look at the time or when you take a certain vote, it was at that time to him the correct vote to take. and you can see he's moving in the right direction in the sense that when you look at, for example, making sure when you look at the right to choose and marry someone you don't take into consideration their sex. that's joe biden moving forward, and i think that's where we need to go. we need to talk about the past and its context but then talk about how we're going to move forward in the future. i think joe biden was trying to say in order to get things done in the united states congress people are complaining a lot about us not getting anything done in congress. and the only way you can get it done is sometimes you've got to deal with individuals who you don't like.

for example, me and the current president. when they did and worked out with my good friend cedric richmond and hakeem jeffreys on the crime bill, prison reform, they then worked a deal. it's not that we changed our opinion of donald trump. but if there's something that we can do to benefit folks, you try to do the deals. but you still want to make sure that you tell the truth about those individuals. and i think he did that. i think the problem that he ran into, at least from my viewpoint, is you don't want to get into the fact because it is very offensive for african-americans particularly african-american males when you think about the history of being called a boy. >> yeah, absolutely. >> that is problem. >> that's something joe biden hasn't been immune to. very often the head doesn't directly connect with the heart

when he's trying to express things. i'm not excusing it and it's not my place to and not my sensitivity. but i've lived long enough being mentored by people like you you have to understand sensitivities even if they're not your own. bottom line, president obama sicard about a circular firing squad. i don't think it was about race at that time. i don't think he could have been that prophetic. do you think you need to talk to the candidates about the nature of their attacks? because one of the things you need high ground on in the general election is when it comes to diversity and respecting diversity and respecting race, other than the first step act, this president has nothing to stand on for high ground. but if you destroy the credibility of somebody at the top of your polls right now, then you may not have that as a weapon to use in the general. >> well, i couldn't agree with you more. i would hope that there'd be continued dialogue between vice president biden and senator booker. that has to happen.

they're both two good men running for the highest office in the land along with all of the other candidates. and so we need to have that kind of conversation. i don't think that we need to get into the actual, you know, personal attacks or anything of that nature that might be good for some with reference to good media and television. but it's not good for the party or country. especially when i know the essence of both senator booker and vice president biden. they're good men who are striving to make a difference and make us a more better -- a more perfect union and who wants to make us a better country. and i think that's what's important. and to hear their vision for the future is what i'm interested in talking about. let's talk about how we're going to make this country better in the future. because we're not a perfect nation. i don't know anyone that is perfect. we are the best on the planet, but we can be a lot better. and i want to hear something inspirational from both on how we're going to move forward for our young folks, for our seniors, for those that are

fighting to make a living. how are we going to improve our lives, and i think that's what the american people are listening for also. >> as once said much better than i ever could, everybody's got cracks. you've got to identify the cracks because that's what let's the light in and gives you a chance to be better. congressman greg meeks, thanks very much for talking to us about iran and what's going on in your party for this all-important primary. appreciate it. >> always good to be with you, chris. all right, a vexing question and i'll be honest, it's one i struggle with asking in earnest, but are we really alone? senators have been seeking answers about possible close encounters of the third kind like this with some of our navy pilots. you know, an unidentified flying object can be really anything that comes from one of our adversaries or even our allies. doesn't have to mean that it's extraterrestrial, but how does d. lemon see it?

does he believe this is proof of something? next.

a classified briefing given to u.s. senators today in light of

a recent uptick in the number of unidentified flying object sightings. now, that does not necessarily mean aliens. but navy officials certainly want answers when it comes to something like this thing, objects that defy the physics of regular aircraft. that's how they put it. listen. >> my gosh! going against the wind. the wind is 120 knots to the west. look at that thing! it's rotating. >> it looks like an eagle, but go on. falcon maybe. >> so what do you think it is? >> i was trying to get -- that was "jeopardy" -- i was trying to do -- >> yeah, you were off. >> yeah, i'm off. i'm off. listen, here's the thing, it could be spycraft from one of our adversaries, but they said it defied the laws of gravity. >> do you think it's an alien?

do you think there is any chance that that exists? >> i don't know that that was an alien. yeah, i believe in aliens. i don't believe that we are the only life out there, and i think there's probably life that may be more evolved and more sophisticated than we are and they are able to see us and maybe we aren't able to see them. i don't know. i'm not leaving that out. if i can -- if i can make for the possibility that there is a higher being and a higher power and put it in a traditional way, some big boss on top of us watching us making sure we don't commit this sin and that. >> right. >> why would that be out of the realm of possibility? >> well, here would be my pushback. i too believe in a higher power. i choose to believe in it. i don't have demonstrable science. i when it comes to ufos, i don't have the arrogance to believe that we're the only one that made it happen on a planet, the only one that science condoned,

but i do not see that as a step in this direction. >> i can't really see what it is. did you see the video last week of -- on the surveillance video of the little -- it looked like a little girl in a parking lot and some people were saying it was an alien. >> yeah. >> so i'm -- it could be. i don't know what this is. to me it looks like it could be an eagle or a falcon or something. i have no idea the size of it. i can't tell. but why not? >> even mel -- mel is in my ear saying i don't see any wings. this stuff is contiguous. on one level that's good. it's good for people to have imagination and creativity. but i'm just kind of -- i'm a little confused as to why the government put it out the way they put it out, you know? and why senators are talking about it. i don't know why they weren't a little bit more specific about what they think it could be. >> ufo, that only means an unidentified flying object. that could be a kite if you can't identify it at the time. it could be anything, right? >> right. >> as you say, it may not be an alien. i got to tell you -- >> may not be an alien.

>> could be an alien. i don't know. but speaking of aliens, and i'm joking with him because he's my friend as well, john kasich is going to join us. and john kasich is going to talk to me about everything, including the escalation, possibly war with iran, whatever we're going to do with what. are we headed that way? and he's also going to talk to us about joe biden and about the comments. are democrats cannibalizing each other? but i call him alien because -- meaning he's different than most. he is not one of the people who has chosen to be on the divisive side of things. he's a person who wants to bring us together. he's a republican and he wants to work with democrats and everyone else. so that's why that may be alien to what we are right now as americans. >> i'd go with different. and make sure that you explain it to him real well. >> no, he's going -- when he joins me at the top of the show or early on in the show, he's going to say, what did you call me? then we'll have a laugh about it. >> all right. i'll see you in a bit, bud. >> see you in a bit. all right. so i know john kasich. he better explain it well.

there has been a major twist. there is no closing argument tonight. i actually have something that i think is better for tonight. did you hear what happened in this trial of this navy s.e.a.l. who is accused of war crimes? this became politically relevant with a pardon offer, but what happened with this witness today, i'll tell you all about it. it literally is something out of a movie, next. pnc bank has technology to help a pnc business line of credit, because sometimes inner peace requires a little external soundproofing. or pnc total auto. a place online to easily find and finance the right car for you. and your passengers. or pnc home insight, to search for a new house within your budget. hopefully with a grass yard. pnc - make today the day. [ text notification now that you have] new dr. scholl's massaging gel advanced insoles with softer, bouncier gel waves,

you'll move over 10% more than before. dr. scholl's. born to move. welcome to our lounge. enjoy your stay. thanks very much. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ find calm in over 1,000 airport lounges worldwide. it's another way we've got your back. the business platinum card from american express. don't do business without it. [ slow dance♪music plays ] sfx: record scratch music (plays throughout): [ 'watch me walk' by spencer ludwig ] yo dj, can i put in a request? ♪ don't have no sass about this ♪ ♪ i'm on my way i'm on my way ♪ ♪ can't take no class about this ♪ ♪ i'm on my way i'm on my ♪ like this! ♪ this is a moment you plan for. to start your investment plan,

find an advisor at massmutual.com sfx: [ mnemonic ] calyou're gonna love this.rs. new coppertone sport clear. not thick, not hot, not messy, just clear, cool, protected. coppertone sport clear. proven to protect. did you know the exact same hotel room...whoooo. ...can have many different prices? that's why tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites to find the lowest price on the hotel you want. your perfect hotel room for the perfect price! behr presents: a job well done. painting be done... and stay done. behr, ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with interior paints. great paint, new low price. starting at $24.98. exclusively at the home depot.

i know it's cliche to start a story with "it's like something out of a movie," but this really is, or at least an episode of "law and order." did you hear what happened in the trial of navy s.e.a.l. chief edward gallagher? he's accused of murdering a prisoner who was a teenage isis fighter. today, a different navy s.e.a.l., a key witness for the prosecution, a key fact, told the court he's the one who killed the prisoner, not gallagher. now, that's a stunner. that s.e.a.l. is special operator first-class corey

scott, a medic. he's the man with the shaved head looking forward here. he told the military court that he did watch gallagher stab the prisoner in the neck, but he said the wound was not life-threatening. he says gallagher walked away and that's when he pressed down on the prisoner's breathing tube, they call it a trach tube, and the prisoner suffocated. he claims he did it because he, "wanted to save the prisoner from the kind of torture he'd seen iraqi forces inflict on other captives." so there is a second twist. the guy scott who confessed in court is on the hook for murder, right? another twist. he had something called a testimonial immunity agreement. that means his testimony, including his confession, cannot be used against him and neither can any information directly or indirectly derived from that testimony. the defense was, of course, thrilled.

>> today for the first time somebody went to one of these witnesses and actually asked the real question, what is the cause of death? >> now, prosecutors are furious. they said navy investigators had six different interviews with scott and he never mentioned anything about this. they say he changed his story after he got an immunity deal. so what's his exposure? well, he could be at risk of a perjury charge that could come with years in jail, but i don't know about a homicide charge but i don't even know if they kept the body to kind of use it, you know, to bring a case. if they can't use his confession, what other proof do they have of this? so that leads to the bigger question now, which is why it's like something out of a movie. is he telling the truth now or was he telling the truth before when he said the other s.e.a.l., gallagher, actually did the killing? a prosecutor accused scott of lying to do exactly that, protect chief gallagher from time behind bars, and scott did respond by saying, well, you know, gallagher's got a wife and

kids, he shouldn't spend the rest of his life in prison. but the confession contradicts testimony by two other s.e.a.l.s who do still say gallagher is the one who killed the prisoner and posed for a picture with the corpse. gallagher is also accused at shooting at unarmed iraqi civilians. so what happens now? the navy says tonight the government is not going to drop premeditated murder charges against gallagher despite petty officer scott's testimony. their own witness says it wasn't him. they're still going forward and saying the credibility of a witness is for the jury to decide. but will a jury convict now? we'll stay on it and let you know. all right. thank you for watching. "cnn tonight" with d. lemon starts right now. i don't know if you got a chance to see, don, but we had greg meeks on. >> mmm-hmm. >> you know, the congressman, longtime congressman and, you know, him, the woman who is at the head of the cbc, the congressional bl