welcome to inside politics. i'm dana bash. the acting homeland security borders investigations into what he calls disturbing and inexcusable online activity by border patrol personnel as more americans call the situation on the border a crisis. and seven democratic presidential candidates are heading to iowa today despite the fact that it is almost a

holiday weekend. and the president is going to speak in front of the lincoln memorial tomorrow at his event which he is calling the show of a lifetime. well, another president called it almost the same thing. and he certainly knew what he was talking about. he was a former act or o. here is ronald reagan speaking in new york. no tanks here him, but he was on a u.s. aircraft carrier. >> in a few moments, the celebration will begin here in new york harbor. it's going to be quite a show. i was just looking over the preparations and thinking about a saying that we had back in hollywood about never doing a scene with kids or animals because they would steal the seem every time. you can rest assured i wouldn't even think about trying to compete with a fireworks display. >> and new today, a source tells cnn that military chiefs have some concern about president trump's july 4th event.

cnn has learned some pentagon leaders are worried the president's salute to america celebration is the military front and center is too political. i'm going to get straight to jim shuuto who joins me with more on his reporting. tell us exactly what you're hearing about the pushback >> this is what i'm told. senior military commanders, including the service chiefs, had deep concerns, major concerns about this event being politicized. they had deep reservations in particular including tanks, ar mored personnel carriers. it is the president's prerogative as commander in chief. and ultimately the pentagon has delivered those tanks you now see on the mall. in addition to that, i'm told some of the service khaoeps were reluctant to participate in a very public way. some of them now from the list of attendance for tomorrow's events are sending in alternates. some of them had previous

commitments on that day. but the bigger picture here is the concern within the pentagon that a lot of the trappings after this event make it more political than the military is comfortable with. >> jim shuuto, that you can for that reporting. appreciate it. the president is spending his time on twitter defending the event that he so meticulously has planned for tomorrow's celebration. he said, quote, the cost of a tkpwraout salute to america tomorrow will be very little compared to what it is worth. we own the planes, we have the pilots, the airport is right next door, andrews, all we need is the fuel. we own the tanks and all. fireworks are donated by two of the greats. nice! here to share their information on that reporting kaitlan collins, john kirby, michael scherer and michael contain wka

the "washington post". admiral, i will start with you. what do you think of this given the fact that you understand what it is like to not just work on the political side? >> i am worried about this on a couple of levels. first of all, it's sort of beneath oss as a strong, confident super power to have to demonstrate our military hardware at an independence day event. i think that is ill-placed. the a little bitization of this and the a little bitization of the military could be nothing more than a big political rally. every time he gets up in front of military members or around the military things he tends to politicize things. i hope he doesn't do that. that's a real concern. >> so we went back inside politics way back machine to see if there is precedent for this. and there's not an exact

precedent. but there are sometimes in recent history where presidents have used the military for parades. eisenhower in 1957, inaugural parade he had a tank there. jfk, 1961. he had a tank and missile. and george h.w. bush, that was june of 1991. this is a battle war celebrating desert storm. >> because you have to keep it in context. i have seen all the stuff on twitter today. people with all of these historical analogies. we have never had a president like this who wrapped himself so much around the military, calling military leaders his generals. he absconds with, i think, or is trying to, with the national story. and the idea with patriotism. he has been more vitt ol'ic, vocal in embracing militaristic

virtue in terms of patriotism and that is not appropriate. >> i know you have heard, as have i, that this whole idea was born in france. >> yeah. >> the president went for bastille day, which is about as analogous as it gets for july 4th. they had a big parade, tanks. >> he was essentially blown away by that. he wasn't supposed to go to that event. when he told there was going to be this military parade, the president, said, okay, i'm going to go instead of sending the vice president. he was enthralled by it. his veterans day got scrapped last year because of the logistics, the cost, it was a scramble at the last minute. he made last-minute demands that has contributed to the unknown factor trying to get all of this equipment. his tweet is just wrong. a lot of equipment coming in is from california, missouri,

kentucky, not just from right next door. of course there will be costs. >> it will cost $2.5 million just at the beginning to come from the national parks service. and that is just a slice for it >> that gives an opening for the house democrats to start asking questions about the cost of this. they have all the perks, congress does. and we will see a lot of letters and information gathering. i think if there were -- if they weren't giving out tickets to republican donors in the vip area and if it were, you know, rank and file military types, this might get a little bit more of a pass. i think this is going to -- congress is going to dig into this. >> do they have time to dig into this? what hours of the day?

>> i think the admiral is right. it's the context of this particular president. you think back to the first days of the administration when he went to the pentagon to announce james mattis's confirmation as secretary of defense, and he -- he signed his travel ban at the pentagon in front of this hall of heroes in this hallowed place. from that point forward, he has used these opportunities that he could sort of fashion into a bipartisan support of the armed forces and the military. but instead tends to veer into, you know, talking about his supporters, talking about other issues. i mean, i frankly wouldn't be surprised if we hear something about the mueller report tomorrow. you know what i mean? who knows? maybe he will avoid that. but that's the problem. it's always wrapped in a much more partisan, political patina than with other presidents. >> and i agree. even if the speech is pitch perfect, he doesn't go political

at all, mike says that still makes me uncomfortable and many military leaders uncomfortable. he is like no other commander in chief. the way he wraps himself into the flag and wants to own military virtue for himself. that makes him unique. even though the speech is good, i'm still not crazy about the optics. >> a pentagon spokesperson said about jim's reporting. it's not unusual for senior leaders to send a representative to functions that they cannot attend due to competing commitments. it is not in a medical tear leader's dna to task a subordinate to do something that the leader does not want to do. >> right. that's exactly right. well spoken. >> you're a former pentagon spokesperson. >> well written, whoever did it. i get the position that they're in. it is putting them in a difficult spot. he is the commander in chief.

he's not asking for something unlawful or unethical or illegal. so you want to try to support that. but you also want to, you know, if you can, maintain the proper sort of distance. i'm not suggesting they are sending substitutes because they don't want to go. i'm told they do have scheduling conflicts. but he is putting them in a difficult spots. he wants each to approach and stand with him as they fly over, again, wrapping it around them like it is his military. it's not. it's the american people's. >> there is this lack of leadership. it habs topsy toughery since james mattis resigned in protest. and patrick shanahan took over. since january, we have seen how that changed in recent days. we have mark esper taking over. it does come at an interesting time in leadership. it is interesting to think of what mattis would do if he had been at d.o.d. >> he slow rolled it. >> i do think this will play

differently in large swaths of the country where a lot of his supporters and a lot of other americans maybe will look at us and say, what are they talking about? he just wants this -- he wants to celebrates america and the might of america. and i think we in this town focus on the 2.5 million which is a tiny amount of money and focus on other things. i think it will play differently. >> that is such an important point. you are talking rightly and what is precedent and maybe the intent of the founders with regard to how we celebrate these things. but there are a lot of people who are saying, right on, mr. president. >> absolutely. >> you are doing exactly what we should be doing, which is celebrating and showing the world america's military might. you have a great piece on cnn.com about this. maybe we should give him the day off. stick around. up next, several 2020 democrats are in iowa today to kick off

their july 4th holiday. stay with us. travis in it made it. it's amazing. oh is that travis's app? it's pretty cool, isn't it? there's two of them. they're multiplying. no, guys, its me. see, i'm real. i'm real! he thinks he's real. geico. over 75 years of savings and service. our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy! whoo-hoo! great-tasting ensure. with nine grams of protein and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. ensure, for strength and energy.

and is the fastest growing place anto buy a car in the nation. carvana is six years old this year it's because we have thousands of people working hard to make our customers' experiences the best. it's because we have tens of thousands of cars ready to be delivered to your doorstep. and it's why hundreds of thousands of happy customers have ditched the dealership and bought their car online, earning us an average 4.7 stars in the process. so if you didn't know about us before, you do now. we're carvana, and we want to give you the car buying experience you deserve. this skrust just in from joe biden's campaign. the former vice president raised $21.5 million in the second quarter. that's actually not the top number among the 2020 democrats, but the biden campaign has a reason. let's get straight to arlette

sands. what are you hearing from the campaign? >> reporter: dana, the campaign sent out an email to their supporters, revealing the former vice president raised $21.5 million in the second fund-raising quarter, a number that has him behind south bend mayor pete buttigieg, who earlier this week announced he raised $24.8 million. biden entered the primary race three weeks into the fund-raising quarter. he wasn't working with an entire three months that the other candidates did. a few other numbers the campaign is citing is 98% was from grassroots supporters, those donating under $200 and received 436,000 donations from 256,000 individual donors. these numbers will be watched closely going forward. there have been a lot of questions about whether the former vice president would be able to mount a strong fund-raising operation and so far, he has shown that he has.

he has dedicated a lot of time in these first few months into fund-raising, holding over two dozen in-person fund-raisers across the country. so far, he was not able to match that figure that was posted by mayor pete buttigieg, an unknown relative mayor a few monthing ago. the numbers that the former vice president will post in the coming weeks will be crucial, especially after you see him dropping in the polls after that first debate. dana? >> thank you for that reporting. so this is important. these are always important milestones, especially since we've seen a report from joe biden. his campaign, rightly so, points out, yes, he's not in the top fund-raiser even though he has been the front-runner but because he got into the race not well into the quarter but as the quarter was already ongoing. what do you make of these numbers, paul? >> it's a pretty impressionable

quarter. he raised $3 million more than bernie sanders took in, who had previously been the fund-raising leader. for a guy who always had pretty easy senate re-elections, who never really had to raise money himself. >> he didn't like it. >> he didn't like doing it, it's probably better than people thought he would have been able to do six months ago. >> one of the differences is that he is doing the traditional fund-raising that others said we will not do, from big donors. i'm not sure if it's correct to use the term bundler but traditional fund-raising and yet 97% of his donations, his campaign is saying, is from grass roots supporters, meaning under $200. the avenlg donation was $49.

what does that tell you? >> that's an interesting competition, who has the smallest donation. it's a proxy for i'm more grass roots than you are, not big m money donors. elizabeth warren has gone most extreme on this saying i'm going to swear off high-dollar fund-raisers entirely, spend my time taking selfies with voters to show people i'm going to confront wall treat and these big corporations. money is obviously not going to win candidates the race but allows them to stay in it, allows them to run the campaigns they want. pete buttigieg is raising a good amount of money but not doing well in the poll, slipped 3%, 4%. it's one metric but not the only one. >> i'm not sure if we have, to put up the context of where we are in the fund-raising. you mentioned pete buttigieg's fund-raising and bernie sanders. there you see it. pete buttigieg, stars we know right now, raised the most, what's been reported in the second quarter. $24. million, biden $21.5

million and bernie sanders $18 million. money doesn't always equal support but it certainly gives you a lifeline. you mentioned pete buttigieg. the fact is, he has a lot of money in the bank. he is only at 4% in the polls. across the board, in the slue of polls we've seen, 4% of the polls, what's up with the difference between the grassroots support, maybe some of the even elite support, people who are giving him money and people who are telling pollsters that they'll support him? >> he doesn't have the name recognition of bernie sanders and former vice president and senator have. i think that's a lot of it. people may not no who he is. now he is becoming more of a nationwide figure but is still an unknown for a lot of people. now, of course, he's facing this big test back home over the use

of police force and how he handles that, i think, will make a big difference and debate performance is a massive part of this. >> we remember being on these campaign trails where, you know, the kind of investment that you need to make as a candidate in june, july, august, september, october so that by the time you get to january and february of next year, you have an operation that can compete in iowa and new hampshire and south carolina and the other states. i mean, all of that is money that you invest now, but you don't necessarily see the impact of all of that money. so, by pete buttigieg having $25 million, that may not immediately be reflected in national polls, certainly, because that money is going to staff and infrastructure. >> it will keep him in the race longer. >> it will keep him in the race, right? people that have to worry on those two stages, debates, are the people in 1%, 2%, 3% and didn't raise much money. they'll face a situation quickly

where they don't have the money. as john mccain proved you can win the race when you sort of end up in a pickup truck with one or two staffers but that's a hard thing to do. when you have the money to compete -- >> speaking, to divert here, about having money in the bank and the race for small donor dollars, i think it's fascinating that on the republican side, the trump campaign, in working with the rnc, they raised record numbers. >> 100 million. >> the most comparable is 54 when you're talking about the trump campaign, his committees. regardless, the focus that they are putting on small donors. small donors, at this point, equals a grass roots network that they're building across the board, republicans and democrats. but it's interesting for the republicans as well. >> he's doing this really for the first time. his campaign four years ago was really bare bones. they hardly raised any money. they didn't do a national advertising campaign until the

final four weeks of the campaign. so, they're doing something different this time around. and they're having some success. i think you want to measure by taking all the democratic candidates versus trump and maybe the rnc, dnc. we'll have to wait another week or so to get all that data. >> and then the question is, who is he going to go up against? we obviously still don't know that. one of the other things i want to get to is the latest polls. we've seen a slue of polls post debate, cnn included, that shows joe biden's lead is shrinking, kamala harris is coming up and now we have a washington post poll out this morning, which shows a similar trend. this poll has biden at 30, sanders at 19, harris at 13, warren at 12. i should say that according to our pollster part of the discrepancy between theirs and the others, they first asked an open ended, who would you support? because biden and sanders have more name recognition, those names were called that first. the trend is the same in all the

polls. >> the debate really scrambled the race. we've seen joe biden. we've seen kamala harris after that stand-out performance vault into second place. elizabeth warren had been rising. she continues to rise and bernie sanders has slipped. i think there's troubling signs for him, given how well known he is. among democrats and voters. can he win that support back that he had in 2016? >> i'll tell you one thing he's going to do. he's going to do an interview on cnn. we have a programming note on that, an exclusive. joe biden and his wife, jill, will sit down with my colleague, chris cuomo. that interview airs friday morning right here on cnn. we'll be right back. here's another reason to join t-mobile. do you like stranger things? sure you do. that's why netflix is on us. and here's another reason to join. bring in your discount, and we'll match it. that's right. t-mobile will match your discount.

his life is pretty comfortable. then, he laid on a serta and realized his life was only just sorta comfortable. i've been living a lie. (laughs) the serta icomfort hybrid mattress. not just sorta comfortable, serta comfortable.

>> a new watchdog report is warning of dangerous conditions at border holding facilities calling them a ticking timebomb. photos and data are released with a set of announced inspections earlier last month. extreme overcrowding, standing room only in some places. internal watchdog report found multiple violations of u.s. detention policy, lack of hot meals, adequate access to showers and limited access to a change of clothes. all this could be resonating

more with the american people. a new cnn poll shows three-quarters of americans now say the situation at the border is a crisis. compare that to six months ago when only 45% would use that word. break it down by party lines and the same finding stands. more republicans, independents and democrats are now willing to call it a crisis compared to swran. biggest jump among democrats, 23% in january, up 70% in june. it's hard to imagine anybody would look at what's going on down there and not call it a crisis. obviously, it has been so steeped in politics it's been hard to so through the politics. you have a book about the ongoing policy that's been going on for decades. when you see the report, members

of congress coming back, talk about it. >> look, what donald trump tried to convince the public of for the first year and a half of his administration was that there was a crisis on the border of a different kind. right? he warned of a national security crisis and economic crisis. that was the crisis that he focused on and people were rightly skeptical. there was a lack of evidence. in fact, if you went and looked, the people who are experts in those areas would say that -- would dispute what the president was saying. what happened was a crisis did form. it's just not the one that the president was talking about. it's a humanitarian crisis. one of the things that's made it worse is the policies that the administration pursued actually exacerbated the kind of difficulties that they are in now. they wanted to detain people but didn't create more safe spaces

to detain them. they wanted to not catch and release as the president talks about and didn't put a lot of effort, money and time into the humanitarian aspects because they wanted money for the wall. that's combined to create this horrible, horrible situation at the border where people are really suffering. >> it's very well said. explained very well. you must be working on a book on this. no, but it is important. so much politics has bin fused that you think one side or the other is doing it for political reasons. sometimes they're right but like the debate last week when congress went back home for july 4th recess it's because there's an actual problem. part of the issue, also, is that you're seeing things like this

inspector jn report where they surprised these facilities and found horrible conditions and part of the reason is because you're hearing more and more from people who are involved in the border patrol talking about what goes on behind the scenes. nick valencia talked to a border agent who wanted to speak to him noanonymous anonymously. listen to what he said. >> the cells are what i would say filthy. we have a maintenance and cleaning crew that cleans the general area, hallways, but i've never seen them cleaning counters, toilets in the cells or sinks in the cell. sometimes you go in a cell and there's trash everywhere. >> to be clear, there are lots of border patrol agents who are

working very hard to do very, very difficult jobs. this one was explaining a systemic problem. >> right. i think more people are calling it a crisis for different reasons. immigration skeptics call it a crisis because they believe too many people are coming across. the system can't handle them. pro-immigration voteers look at reports like that, testimonials like that and say tas a crisis because of the conditions that these people face. i think the system is kind of overwhelmed right now. there's a mismatch between what the federal government is required to do under law. people come here. they have to have their right to be heard in court to make their case that they deserve asylum. they can't be turned away. tens of thousands of people are backlogged. there's not enough money to handle it. this hasn't been overhauled in a long time. now we're seeing the consequences. >> we cannot forget that there are human beings involved, there are children involved and this picture just broke high hearmy .

the humanitarian respite center in texas, you see the photo there. kids were asked to draw pictures and these are the photos of the world that they know, which anybody who has kids or has ever met a kid or ever was a kid look as this the and sees it's absolutely heartbreaking. because they are absolutely not in control of the situation. >> paul can talk about this better than i can. it's putting -- images like that are putting democrats in a tough spot. they are knee-jerk opposed to just about every single thing that this administration wants to do on immigration for reasons that are both good for their politics but also substantive. at the same time it's hard not to respond by saying you need to give the administration more money, more resources, which is what the fight was. >> which is why the speaker defied her caucus. >> that's right. >> stand by. before we go to break we want to look at the funeral

today for 9/11 first responder luis alvarez. he died saturday from cancer linked to his service of those painful days in 2001. among those who spoke today was alvarez's son. >> in his last moments before taking his last breath, i told him i love him. i love you, dad. i promise to keep walking on the brave side of the line. i promise to be the man you inspired me to be. thank you. ♪ my experience with usaa has been excellent. they really appreciate the military family and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their rates are good, we know that they're always going to take care of us. it was an instant savings and i should have changed a long time ago. it was funny because when we would call another insurance company, hey would say "oh we can't beat usaa" we're the webber family. we're the tenney's

we're the hayles, and we're usaa members for life. ♪ get your usaa auto insurance quote today. if you have moderate to little things can be a big deal. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression.

tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ready to treat differently with a pill? otezla. show more of you. so you have ten years experience... i do. but no phd? first kid here's all the numbers, food's in the fridge, oh and lucas likes to pull on jewelry so you might want to lose the nose ring. by their second kid, parents are more likely to choose luvs. live, learn, and get luvs.

from l'oréal paris.ra voluptuous volume. intense length. feathery-soft lashes. this is what paradise looks like. lash paradise mascara from l'oréal paris. take your lashes to paradise.

topping our political radar today, eddie gallagher was found guilty of posing with a dead isis fighter. he was cleared of all the serious charges against him, including premeditated murder. gallagher says he's grateful to those who supported him, including president trump, who considered giving him a pardon. >> i feel completely grateful and blessed to have the support i've had this whole time. also to president trump for intervening when he did. >> the president tweeted his congratulations to gallagher and his family, saying you have been through much together. glad i could help. earlier this hour we revealed

joe biden's second quarter fund-raising amounts, $21.5 million. michael bennet's campaign pulled in $2.8 million, edging on john hickenlooper, who raised more than $1 million, according to a source. pete buttigieg is in iowa today, unveiling a plan to push national service. it's been a theme for the presidential candidate who served in afghanistan. supreme court justice ruth bader ginsburg, the second woman in history added to the premium court is praising her new colleague, brett kavanaugh. she spoke in washington on tuesday. >> there is a very important first on the supreme court this

term, and it's thanks to our new justice, justice kavanaugh, whose entire staff of all women, it's the first time in the history of the united states that there have been more women working at the court than men. >> and up next, getting hammered by conservatives for caving on his administration's quest to put a citizenship question in the 2020 census, the president is saying on twiter that the fight isn't over, but democrats are celebrating and the lawyer who argued against the administration at the supreme court tweeted a barbed at secretary wilbur ross with a short "no soup for you." the nation's largest and most reliable network. the best network is even better? best, fastest, best. enough. sprint's doing things differently. they're offering a new 100% total satisfaction guarantee. i mean i think sprint's network and savings are great,

but don't just take my word for it. try it out and decide for yourself. switch to sprint and get both an unlimited plan and one of the newest phones included for just $35 a month.

hi, i'm joan lunden. when my mother began forgetting things, we didn't know where to turn for more information. that's why i recommend a free service called a place for mom. we have local senior living advisors who can answer your questions about dementia or memory care and, if necessary, help you find the right place for your mom or dad.

we all want what's best for our parents, so call today.

reports about dropping the request to put the citizenship on the census is incorrect. we are absolutely moving forward as we must. while wilbur ross disagreed with the supreme court ruling he said, quote, my focus is to conduct a complete and accurate census. after looking at time

constraints, lower court opinions and possible new injunctions, quote, officials just thought it wasn't realistic. cnn's jessica schneider has been reporting on this. jessica, if you look at the president's tweets it's unclear exactly what the administration is doing. what is actually happening at the department of commerce with regard to the census moving forward? is it or is it not? >> it is moving forward, dana. we got that indication yesterday. it is going to print without that citizenship question. it is only the president that really continues to spark this uncertainty. he continued to tweet that this fight isn't over, that he will still push to get the citizenship question on the census but all other indications are that this battle is over, that the doj has backed down and, in fact, the census, without that citizenship question, has started the printing process. that's what a doj lawyer told the judge last night, saying

essentially this fight is over. that was yesterday. there's also another hearing in the maryland case that could be provided later today. they're calling them together and saying this is final and the doj has made its final decision, especially in light of the president's constant tweet this is morning and then this afternoon. and then in addition to that, we've also gotten word that the director of the census bureau, dr. steven dillingham, will testify three weeks today before a subcommittee of the house oversight committee. democrats want the census bureau director to come to capitol hill to find out how ready the agency is to properly roll out this ce census and get people counted. essentially they're saying they're in danger of not meeting security, i.t. standards and that officials aren't properly educating the public about what is expected here. dana, this census is moving

forward. the printing, according to the doj, has already begun. it's been sent to the printer and the citizenship question will not appear on it, despite the president's insistent tweets otherwise. dana? >> an important fact check. the president obviously heard from conservatives who were saying his callers were flooding the phone lines to his radio show today, saying that the president threw in the towel. so, it sounds as though the president was using his twitter feed to try to say that it's not going to happen, to try to calm his supporters, even though it's not factually correct. thank you, jessica, for that report. up next, the latest culture war debate over sneakers. this is nice. yeah...yeah, this is nice. hmm. how did you make the dip so rich and creamy?

oh it's a philadelphia-- family recipe. can i see it? no. philadelphia dips. so good, you'll take all the credit. her saturdays are a never- ending montage of comfort. [tv sfx]: where have you been all my life? but then anne laid on a serta perfect sleeper. and realized her life was only just sorta comfortable. not just sorta comfortable. serta comfortable.

not just sorta comfortable. wenit gave me a leafput in the names almost right away. first. within a few days, i went from knowing almost nothing to holy crow, i'm related to george washington. i didn't know that using ancestry would be so easy. going back to the doctor just for a shot. with neulasta onpro...

...patients get their day back... ...to be with... ... family... ...or just to sleep in. strong chemo can put you at risk of serious infection. in a key study... ...neulasta reduced the risk of infection from 17%... ...to 1%... ...a 94% decrease. neulasta onpro is designed to deliver... ...neulasta the day after chemo... ...and is used by most patients today. neulasta is for certain cancer patients receiving strong chemotherapy. do not take neulasta if you're allergic to it or neupogen (filgrastim). an incomplete dose could increase infection risk. ruptured spleen, sometimes fatal as well as serious lung problems, allergic reactions, kidney injuries and capillary leak syndrome... ...have occurred. report abdominal or shoulder tip pain, trouble breathing... ... or allergic reactions to your doctor right away in patients with sickle cell disorders, serious, sometimes... ...fatal crises can occur. the most common side effect... is bone and muscle ache. ask your doctor... ...about neulasta onpro. pay no more than $5 per dose with copay card.

prestige creams not living up to the hype? olay regenerist shatters the competition. big hype? big price? big deal! olay regenerist hydrates skin better than creams costing over $100, $200, and even $400. for skin that looks younger than it should. fact check this ad in good housekeeping. olay regenerist. now try olay hydrating eye. hydrates better than the #1 prestige eye cream.

sparking outrage for these special fourth of july sneaker, featuring the betsy ross flag. shoes had been shipped nationwide but were recalled by the company after former nfl quarterback colin kaepernick complained saying he and the others found the use of the colonial era flag offensive, according to a wall street journal report. doug doucie is retaliating against nike, ordering the state to pull incentives for the upcoming multi-million dollar plant. mitch mcconnell is also urging nike to reverse course.

>> i hope nike releases these shoes or some other shoe maker picks up the flag, puts it on a pair of shoes and starts selling it. i'll make the first order. >> we'll get to the culture war and politics in a second. just the economics of it, doug doucie saying we don't want jobs here is a risky business, one that democratic governors are jumping on. gavin newsom of california, hey, nike, quick jaunt over the border, saying come here. governor grisham saying nike, let's talk. the economics is quite risky even though the culture and political decision is obvious for these republicans. >> the city where the nike facility was supposed to go is not saying what ducey is saying.

i think that's important, too. >> everything has become political. we started talking about july fourth and parades and that's political, related to 2020. nike, which for years was symbolized by tiger woods and michael jordan is now viewed as a colin kaepernick kneeling for the anthem type of company. that's where we are right now. >> quick to criticize the president on this, i think, is stating the obvious political analysis of this, saying donald trump has reaped enormous political benefits from the ill-judged fashion among nfl players to kneel during the national anthem. if the president wins re-election, perhaps he should write a thank you note to colin kaepernick and nike. >> culture wars are the currency of this presidency. that clip with mcconnell, he knows how to read a moment, has

a base to galvanize. he's up for re-election. 's very comfortable with this and so is the president. and many of his party members are following suit. >> thank you for watching "inside politics." brianna keilar is starting right no now. >> i'm brianna keilar live from cnn headquarters. squaller conditions and severe overcrowding inside migrant facilities with a senior manager calling the situation a ticking time bomb. more than $2 million meant to improve the nation's national parks has been diverted to cover president trump's july 4th is his 2020 bid in trouble? will s