tapping sounds from inside the ship. 20 other crew members were rescued early sunday. officials are trying to determine why the ship capsized. good news for a rescue. thanks very much for watching. "erin burnett outfront" starts right now. "outfront" next, trump says he knows nothing about sharing classified information. cnn learning, though, that he is part of the reason that his own intelligence agency pulled a top spy from putin's inner circle. plus, profiting off the presidency. trump insisting he never ordered his vice president or the air force to stay at his resorts, but his explanation doesn't seem to add up. and trump making a last-minute push for a republican in a must-win special election tonight. will the president's presence there live this hour hurt his candidate or not? let's go "outfront"? and good evening. i'm erin burnett. "outfront" tonight, trump stumped. the president who claims to know better than anyone else suddenly knows nothing about an

incredibly damning allegation based on cnn's exclusive reporting. here's trump late today. >> can you respond to the reports today that say that you have mishandled classified information to russia. >> no, i know nothing about it. i see the cia responded perfectly, so whatever the cia said is fine with me. but i heard they responded perfectly. i know nothing. >> okay, the question first to cnn's bombshell report that trump's intelligence community, the cia, extracted a crucial spy from russia, in part because of fears that trump, the president of the united states, trump could expose the spy through his mishandling of classified information. according to administration officials, the decision to remove the spy -- who i want to be clear, was a crucial spy for a few reasons, one of which was that this person was at a very high level inside the russian government and was considered vital to the united states -- well, the extraction occurred soon after this 2017 meeting in the oval office.

you may remember this picture, because this is the meeting where trump shared highly classified intelligence about isis with the russian foreign minister, sergey lavrov, and the then-russian ambassador to the united states, sergey kislyak. now, at the time, trump defended himself by tweeting that he had the absolute right -- "i have the absolute right to share u.s. intelligence." well, that's true. of course, sharing it with an adversary of the united states would go counter to the -- what people want that to be used for. well, the president's then national security adviser was then forced, because the president defended himself, to then twist himself in a pretzel to defend trump. remember this? >> are you denying that he revealed information that was given to the u.s. by an intelligence partner? >> so what we don't do is discuss what is and what isn't classified. what i will tell you is that in the context of that discussion, what the president discussed with the foreign minister was

wholly appropriate. >> well, according to sources in both the intelligence agencies and the trump administration, the accurate words for what trump did were wholly inappropriate. but the true shocker about what trump said today was these specific words about the reporting. >> i see the cia responded perfectly. so whatever the cia said is fine with me. but i heard they responded perfectly. >> "responded perfectly," "fine with me," "perfectly." this cia, the one about which trump has tweeted perhaps intelligence should go back to school, or the intelligence people seem to be passive, extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of iran. that same cia that he said this about -- >> do you trust intelligence? >> uh, not so much from the people that have been doing it for our country. >> well, they're perfect tonight. boris sanchez is "outfront" at

the white house. boris, pretty amazing, right? nothing but bad things to say about them and how, you know, dumb and naive and clueless and he doesn't trust them, except when they say what he wants them to say. how is the administration responding to this bombshell report tonight? >> erin, so far the response from the administration has been dismissive, even though five separate sources, all who served in the trump administration told our colleague jim sciutto that president trump's disclosures to these russian officials ultimately had an impact on this top u.s. spy in russia being extracted. we should point out, sources have indicated that at the time, cia director mike pompeo told other top administration officials that there was too much information coming out about this spy. so pompeo at the time clearly recognized the risk that this spy was facing. pompeo, now secretary of state, declined to comment for this story through a spokesperson. a spokesperson for the cia did put out a statement, saying that cnn's narrative that the reporting here is inaccurate. suggesting that it's the result of misguided speculation.

the press secretary for the white house, stephanie grisham, put out a statement saying that cnn's reporting is not only incorrect, it has the potential to put lives in danger. of course, you heard directly from president trump there, saying that he knows nothing about this story. it's really just another instance of the division and the divide between president trump and officials in his intelligence community. erin? >> and of course, boris, it sounds like, look, there are five sources. it's clear what the reporting is here. when he doesn't like it, they just say, it's all a bunch of lies and this spokesperson that they have at the cia, then they love the cia. so it's pretty incredible when you see all of that. boris, thank you very much. and i want to go now to democratic congressman eliot engel, who is the chairman on the house foreign affairs committee. so this is right in the center of what you are dealing with, chairman. so this, what we understand, from the reporting, as boris said, five sources. one of the u.s.' highest-level covert sources inside the russian government. just so people understand,

chairman, what does the loss of a spy at this level, of an asset at this level do to america's ability to counter one of the greatest threats that there is to american national security? >> well, it's terrible. and it really strikes at the heart of it, because it's not only this asset, it's what comes down the tube. so what other assets are we going to get if this is the way we treat someone that we have now. so it does tremendous damage, again, not only immediate damage, but for the future, as well. >> do you know anything about what this spy was providing to the united states or about why this person was considered to be so crucial? >> well, i don't know the specifics of it, but obviously, skprugs the united stat russia and the united states have spied against each other many, many times. so we know that both countries have spies. the question is, how do we handle spies? and i don't know what it is with this mirpgs aadministration and

president. everything seems to be fly by the seat of your pants. not thought out, just thrown out there, amateurish. i just don't get it. i don't understand it, and it's one after the other after the other after the other. and when is it going to end? >> do you think that president trump can be trusted with classified information? i mean, obviously, the reporting is here that he was fear about what he said would expose this spy. i would presume not necessarily by putting the spy's name out there to the russians, but sharing enough information that it became clear who was providing it. >> well, my god, if you can't trust the president of the united states, who can you trust. this is just -- it's shocking to even think that we would be having this conversation and that it would be the realm of possibility that the president of the united states was in collusion with some unsavory characters that we don't even like to think about. i hope not. i hope not. but, you know, it keeps coming up again and again and again.

and you know, you worry, what is it with putin that this president has a fixation with? i mean, everything with putin, that putin does, that's not beneficial to the united states, the president of the united states seems to look the other way or encourage it or not care about it. it makes you scratch your head. when would you ever have imagined that this kind of thing would have happened in the united states? i know i wouldn't have. >> chairman, i want to ask you also about afghanistan. over the weekend, the president revealed he wanted to host secret peace talks, which included taliban officials at camp david and he says he canceled them after a taliban car bomb killed a u.s. soldier. here is what he said today. >> they're dead. they're dead. as far as i'm concerned, they're dead. they thought they had to kill people in order to put themselves in a little better negotiating position. >> and of course, he's talking

about the talks being dead, chairman. do you want to see these talks revived in any form? >> well, i don't want to see taliban in camp david, period. who was the brilliant person that came up with that? i mean, it's just absolutely outrageous. and, you know -- >> well, we've been reporting vice president pence was against holding the talks there. do you have any sense as to why the president was pushing ahead with this, right around the anniversary of 9/11, to have the taliban at camp david? >> no, i have no sense of it at all. it makes me scratch my head. and again, you were saying september 11th, you know, i'm from new york city. it was my hometown that was attacked. i just can't think of anything more disgusting -- you know, camp david is sort of a revered place for americans. i cannot imagine anything more disgusting than the taliban being there. >> chairman, i want to ask you about one other important story tonight. you're, of course, in addition

to foreign affairs on the commerce committee and energy committee. "the new york times" is reporting tonight that wilbur ross, the secretary of commerce, threatened to fire people, top employees at noaa if they didn't basically disavow a tweet from the birmingham office. i don't know if you remember this tweet. it's the one that contradicted the president's false claim that dorian was likely to hit alabama. the commerce department is saying, of course, this reporting is false, but this is a "new york times" report. it's thoroughly vetted. do you believe it? and do you think that secretary ross needs to resign? >> well, i believe it, because i think "the new york times" is careful. it's certainly a reputable paper and certainly careful in making sure that what it says is truthful. so i think it's shocking -- maybe it is sonnet sho shocking. you know what's most shocking? that it isn't shocking anymore. i'm almost numb. it's one thing after another

after another. and yes, i think he should consider resigning, because i think it's a disgrace. >> chairman engle, thank you so much for your time, sir. >> thank you. next, president trump said he had nothing to do with the air force's decisions to stay at his properties because he's rich. >> i don't need to have somebody take a room overnight at a hotel. plus, 2020 contender tim ryan defending comments he made about joe biden declining. >> it's not like i said something that a lot of people aren't thinking or he wouldn't have went on colbert to talk about it. >> are democrats really worried? and the president calling my next guest a joke, a laughingstock. so what is 2020 republican contender for the white house mark sanford's response? i have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

now, there's skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people achieved... ...90% clearer skin at 4 months... ...after just 2 doses. skyrizi may increase your risk of infections... ...and lower your ability to fight them. before treatment your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection... ...or symptoms such as fevers,...

...sweats, chills, muscle aches or coughs... ...or if you plan to or recently received a vaccine. i feel free to bare my skin. visit skyrizi.com. thand find inspiration who win new places.ct... leading them to discover: we're woven together by the moments we share. everything you need, all in one place. expedia. [happy ♪irthday music] ♪ don't get mad, put those years to work with e*trade.

there are three words when you live with migraine... "i am here."

aim to say that more with aimovig. a preventive treatment for migraine in adults that reduces the number of monthly migraine days. for some, that number can be cut in half or more. don't take aimovig if you're allergic to it. allergic reactions like rash or swelling can happen hours to days after use. common side effects include injection site reactions and constipation. aim to be there more. talk to your doctor about aimovig.

new tonight, president trump denying he pushed the air force to stay at one of his resorts during a refueling stop in scotland, or vice president, his resort in ireland during an overseas trip. >> i don't need to have somebody take a room overnight at a hotel. mike pence, as an example, his family lives in doonbeg, ireland. he was in ireland, he said, you know, what i'll do, i'll see my family. i didn't know about that, but i can say, he has good taste. >> okay. trump defending the controversial resort visits as the house judiciary committee plans to move forward this week with its impeachment investigation. manu raju is "outfront." manu, this is now going to be a part of the impeachment probe, right? and it's going to be important. and you now know also the timeline. impeachment has gone from being vague to this is what we're talking about, this is specific from chairman nadler to now. you know timing. >> reporter: yeah, they're expecting to get a result. they want to have a final decision by the end of the year

about whether or not to recommend articles of impeachment against the president of the united states. and at that point, the house judiciary committee would presumably vote to impeach the president, then it could go to the full house. and then after that, the senate, two-thirds of the senate would have to decide whether or not to convict the president and try to remove him from office, something that would be highly unlikely given the republican control of the senate. nevertheless, this is a significant escalation in what we have seen over the last several weeks here. the judiciary committee on thursday will be voting to formalize this process in considering how to deal with witnesses and investigations and hearings in the days and weeks ahead. and essentially mirroring what the same committee, the house judiciary committee did in 1974 when it came to the nixon impeachment proceedings. afterward, we expect corey lewandowski, the former campaign manager, of -- for president trump to come before this committee and ask -- be asked questions under the expectation that this is essentially -- these are essentially impeachment proceedings. but erin, i asked the house

speaker, nancy pelosi, whether or not she agrees with jerry nadler, the judiciary committee chairman that they are in, quote, formal impeachment proceedings. she would not say, instead, that it's only a possibility that they may ultimately impeach. and just moments ago, the house majority leader, the number two, steny hoyer who has been resistant and skeptical about moving forward with impeachment says all they're doing is a continuation of the investigation that's been happening for months. you're hearing a divide, erin, still about democrats about whether or not this is the way to go forward. but the moment house judiciary democrats are pushing ahead on something that could lead them to recommend articles of impeachment. >> they have made very clear it's a formal impeachment hearing. right now, patrick healey and april ryan. patrick, i spoke to a democratic congresswoman, madeleine dean on friday. we all said, this is going to be really important, this time they go home. gun control and impeachment. she's on the judiciary committee. she said, she had a whole lot of

town halls and the issue that was resonating with people was corruption and trump profiting from office. >> right. >> exactly what we're talking about here. not so much russia, but this. is this now the way democrats are going to get to impeachment? >> it's a real issue for trump, because a lot of democrats have said for some time, we don't know how russia is going to turn out. we don't know how obstruction of justice and the mueller report is going to turn out. but corruption is sitting right the there. the reality is this president came into office owning a great many properties in washington, d.c., around the world, and there were questions. and there were questions about would there be conflicts of interest. about government contracts, government workers staying at some of these places. and now you're seeing vice president mike pence on down to the air force to other parts of -- other branches of the government, that are staying here. you know, i think a lot of americans got used to the sense that the government would be above even the perception of a

conflict of interest. >> not the case at all. >> here, there's none of that. >> now we're getting justifications of distant, distant relatives of whatever, of being the justification when you're going to meetings 200 miles away. it's silly. april, is president trump worried, ultimately is what this comes down to, about this focus on corruption when it comes to impeachment? >> when it comes to impeachment, this president is worried. he's pulling his hair out. well, i'm not going to say that. maybe he's put mting more hair spray on his hair to hold it down. but the bottom line when it comes to impeachment, the i-word is an albatross around this president's neck. he is allergic to it. and this is just yet another nail in the impeachment coffin. this is not just about good taste, as the president says. this is about taxpayers' money being used to line the president's pockets, bottom line, by his vice president and by the military. this is not good. this is worst than a conflict of interest. and erin, when this -- when you see something like this, the american public gets this one.

you know, we may talk about russia and if there was collusion or obstruction of justice. that's kind of heady sometimes and cerebral, and we have to find -- connect all the dots. but this one, you can connect the dots. everyone can connect the dots. >> he said he was going to divest himself and he hasn't and he's still getting the profits. and i think we need to always be very clear about that when we do these stories. the president today tweeted about the visits by the air force and pence. "i know nothing about an air force plane landing at an airport which i do not own and have nothing to do near turnberry resort, which i do own, in scotland, and filling up with fuel with the crew staying overnight at turnberry, they have good taste. nothing to do with me. and i had nothing to do with the decision of our great vp mike pence to stay overnight at one of the trump owned resorts in doonbeg, ireland. the quote from marc short was, quoting the president, "you should stay at my place," okay? so the president says he knows

nothing about it. so who's lying? trump or pence's chief of staff? >> well, we know marc and i believe marc has more voracity and validity than, unfortunately, than the president of the united states. we've caught the president saying untruths before -- well, lies, if you will. he said it on air force one. "i did not direct michael cohen," and then we heard tapes, he did direct michael cohen. so i think the president needs to be very careful in saying what he has not done, because someone or a tape will come up and say. the president has no credibility when he denies something. because ultimately someone else comes out and says it. skpuf and unfortunately, we're believing other people other than the president. >> so patrick, when it came to these stays by the air force and by vice president pence at these particular resorts, trump said, it had nothing to do with me, i know nothing. which when you hear that is an echo of what he has said before about certain things, like this. >> you know, i know nothing about david duke.

>> i have nothing to do with russia. >> i know nothing about the inner workings of russia. i don't deal there. i have no businesses there. >> okay, just to be clear, those statements were false. he had done plenty of business in russia and he had known about david duke for decades. here he is denying any knowledge about the hush money payment to stormy daniels, which, of course, subsequently turned out to be a complete lie. here he is. >> do you know about the $130,000 payment to stormy daniels? >> no. >> then why do -- >> do you know where he got the money to make that payment? >> no, i don't know. >> okay, so he did know about it and he did know where he got it. this is what trump says about things when he seems to know a lot. he says he knows nothing. >> right. this is a go-to. this is a guy who feasted for years on sort of tabloid journalism, calling up tabloid columns and basically planting stories, either saying, this is inside information or he knew nothing. he speaks in these vast sort of generalizations, you know, looking for kind of big

headlines. you know, i know nothing about it, i know nothing about it. and he expects -- and look, the reality is 90% or so of the republican party gives him a high approval rating. he says i know nothing and he sort of expects the american electorate to just go along with it, even when it's demonstrably proven false, time after time after time. >> right, why would marc short make that up? it's absurd? we all know what the truth is in that situation. but the question is, has he put us in a better position. >> erin, you know what? >> yeah? >> you know what, erin, for the president to say that he knows nothing about it, that's fake news. >> well, that's true. that's a fake fact. whatever that might be. thank you both. >> fake news. and next, testing trump's clout. the president rallying supporters tonight, just hours before a crucial special election. so will he make a difference? why is he there? wait until you see who's with him. plus, the president's campaign predicting that trump's will be a dynasty that lasts for

decades. and this is the word that is being used, a dynasty. how does trump's political critics feel about that. when did you see the sign? when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics. yeah, and now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com.

"burger! i want a sugar cookie! i want a bucket of chicken! i want....." "it's the easiest, because it's the cheesiest" kraft. for the win win. (drum roll) and the record for longest-lasting aa battery goes to... (cymbal crash) energizer ultimate lithium. guinness world records title holder for longest-lasting aa battery. you don't need to go anywhere dad, this is your home. the best home to be in is your own. home instead offers personalized in-home services for your loved ones. home instead senior care. to us, it's personal. eh, not enough fiber... chocolate would be good... snacking should be sweet and simple. the delicious taste of glucerna gives you the sweetness you

crave while helping you manage your blood sugar. glucerna. everyday progress ♪ boom goes the dynamite, club yoko plays ] ♪ feels like i'm taking flight. ♪ [sfx: poof] [sfx: squeaking eraser sound effect.] ♪ i am who i wanna be ♪ who i wanna be ♪ who i wanna be. ♪ i'm a strong individual ♪ feeling that power ♪ i'm so original, ♪ ya sing it louder. ♪ i am, oooh oooh oooh oooh ♪ ehhh ehhh ehhh ehhh ♪ i am, oooh oooh oooh oooh

♪ i am to the wait did frowe just win-ners. prouders everyone uses their phone differently. that's why xfinity mobile let's you design your own data. now you can share it between lines. mix with unlimited, and switch it up at anytime so you only pay for what you need. it's a different kind of wireless network designed to save you money. save up to $400 a year on your wireless bill. plus get $250 back when you buy a new samsung note. click, call or visit a store today.

tonight, a major political test for president trump ahead of 2020 and you are looking at live pictures. the president in north carolina, he's stumping for the republican, dan bishop on the eve of a big special election. the race is incredibly close, between bishop and democrat dan mccready and the president is now trying to downplay expectations for his guy. >> no, i don't see it as a bellwether. they always ask that question.

the '18 election, the big thing is, i was not running. people say, oh, it was a referendum on trump. it wasn't. i'm not running. people are running. >> "outfront" now, rob astorino, a member of trump's 2020 re-election advisory counsel and joan walsh, national affairs correspondent for "the nation." rob, vice president mike pence is back from doonbeg. donald trump jr. is also -- they are both with the president tonight, okay? he's going to a rally for this guy, bishop, and why would you go to this rally and have all of these people there unless he thought it was important. >> clearly it's important. there's no question about it, it's important. trump is not on the ballot, but he is on the ballot. and the midterms did not go well. that kind of was a referendum on him, at least that's what the democrats portrayed. and look, the democrats have been out of their minds excited since election day, to get him out of there. and they did well in the midterms, but this is a special

election that is, you know, has a lot of different complications in it. the third is going to be won by the republicans. the third district. that's coastal carolina and the outer banks. that's a strong republican. this, i've listened and talked to people in the bishop campaign. their internal polling is much better than people think. the early voting was strong against him, but they've recovered. and it's really now who can get their base vote out. and trump's rally tonight is a big part of that. because it's in the eastern part of the district. >> and in doing this rally, he's admitting it's a referendum on him. he can say whatever he wants to say, but joan, it is clearly a referendum on him. he's got a lot at stake. >> he won that district by 12 points in 2016. so the fact that it slid so far that it's even in doubt is crazy. so, you know, you're sending all of those people there, but it's not a bellwether. i think the other, you know, wild card, i would not call this race, i think it's too close. but the other wild card is the president being there, yes, it

revs up his base, but it also revs up the democratic base, who they're forgetting -- people could forget that there's a special election on a tuesday in september. and they already voted for this guy, who only -- you know, it's just been such a long, crazy ride. but it could help goose democratic -- >> what is it that there's a fight going on. there's complexity and nuance in any election. but he won it by 12 points. these things shouldn't but for discussion, yet they are. how significant is that? >> politics is cyclical. and we're in a time right now, the big question, i think, is we know democrats are really excited about votingove ing ove last two years going in. republicans have kind of sleepwalked over the last two years and that's why they lost some close races. they didn't get out their vote. they're waking up and seeing what speaker pelosi and the house democrats stand for. what elizabeth warren and bernie sanders stand for, and this is almost a referendum on speaker pelosi and ilhan omar and aoc as

it is -- >> trump is trying to make it. at this point, joan, let me ask you, you talk about warren and sanders and obviously, she's been rising in the polls. biden is still by far the front-runner, but had been dropping and you can combine warren and sanders and get a number of a lot more than joe biden's. so tim ryan, is a guy wloho's running for president. >> i have heard. >> he's come out and said something that a lot of people won't say, but some people are talking about, okay? he told bloomberg that he thinks biden is, quote, declining. >> and not in the polls. >> and not in the polls, all right? so he came out and said this and then he explained those comments to cnn. here's what he said. >> it's not like i said something that a lot of people aren't thinking, or he wouldn't have went on colbert to talk about it. so this is an issue, we have to be honest with each other. there's so much at stake in this election. >> okay. there's the fact that he said it, which, you know, perhaps is

not right or inappropriate, but is he right that this is what people are really thinking and this is important? >> some people are, but you know, i don't know that the democratic base voters are paying that much attention. i think it's a terrible thing for him to do. i think he looks really desperate. he's at about 1% in the polls. it looks a little cruel. it's not going to work for him. maybe it opens this door to other candidates, but i think right now, people are going to be very loathe to challenge biden in that kind of personal way. he's a very well-respected figure in the party. and i think it hurts anybody who goes there. >> will trump go there? they're, what? two and a half, three years apart in age? trump goes there with sleepy joe, but he doesn't -- >> trump says things that people realize have at least a kernel of truth to or points out the obvious. people are saying that biden is slipping mentally. i mean -- and it's not the republicans who started that. democrats are doing it because they've got a lot at stake. tim ryan's not going anywhere

and he's certainly not going to be a cabinet secretary if biden wins, but the democrats, for warren and biden -- for buttigieg and harris and warren, they want that dialogue out there. there's no question. >> is that fair to say, joan? >> probably. >> that they're glad tim ryan said this? because they don't want to say it, but -- >> probably. and he needs to be tested, even though he's as old as he is, can he withstand the rigors of this campaign? it's tough. he has a lot of competitors. >> yet, he has withstood two debates. first, was not a great performance. second was better. and this week, another important debate. >> but i don't think he did very well on the climate change town hall. >> i didn't either. >> i think, you know, his whole story about the soldier and all of this stuff and parkland students, when he was vice president, i mean, so he's really -- he's made some not gaffes, but he's made some really big errors. >> the interesting thing, though, i kind of feel like the

biden campaign's way of handling these gaffes, so to speak, is to say, it's essentially true. to borrow -- you know, you don't hold trump to account, right? you know, trump lies all the time, so we're just going to -- we're going to dig in. i gave a medal to a guy who didn't want it, it was very sad. that part's true. i'm not defending this, but this is what they look to be doing. >> thank you both. and next, trump slamming his 2020 republican challengers. >> the three people are a total joke. they're a joke. they're a laughingstock. >> well, one of them, mark sanford, responds. and we'll take you to one of the most majestic places in the united states. what is happening there could impact everyone on earth for generations to come. maria ramirez? hi. maria ramirez! mom!

maria! maria ramirez... mcdonald's is committing 150 million dollars in tuition assistance, education, and career advising programs... prof: maria ramirez mom and dad: maria ramirez!!! to help more employees achieve their dreams. i can. the two words whispered at the start of every race. every new job. and attempt to parallel park. (electrical current buzzing) each new draft of every novel. (typing clicks) the finishing touch on every masterpiece. (newborn cries) it is humanity's official two-word war cry. words that move us all forward. the same two words that capital group believes have the power to improve lives. and that, for over 85 years, have inspired us to help people achieve their financial goals. talk to your advisor or consultant

for investment risks and information.

new tonight, president trump ruling out debates with the three republicans challenging him for 2020. >> are you willing to debate the republicans who are running against you? >> i don't know them. i would say this, they're all at less than 1%. it's a -- i guess it's a publicity stunt. to be honest, i'm not looking to give them any credibility. they have no credibility. the three people are a total joke. they're a joke. they're a laughingstock. >> all right.

well, "outfront" now is one of those republicans, the latest entry into the 2020 race, former republican congressman and governor from south carolina, mark sanford. governor, good to have you back. so, i just look at the numbers here, putting aside the way he says things, 84% approval rating among republicans is what he has right now. in republican primaries, they're the ones who matter. so his words may be completely and utterly inappropriate, but is his point right? >> well, no at two different levels. one, to your first point, everybody is a joke compared to donald trump. the sun, moon, and stars are aligned around him. and so rex tillerson, who happened to run exxonmobil, and you can be for him or against him, but is an awfully credible guy and a former secretary of state is a joke. paul ryan, the author of the tax plan that the president has now claimed was a joke. i could go down a litany of different folks where everybody is considered a joke if you're not donald trump. as to your second point on the

84%, i think that what's most telling about those polls is that it suggests that his support is a mile wide and perhaps an inch deep. because about half of those folk s consistently, in the polls that i've heard have said that they would like to see the president challenged. that they would like to have a debate on where we go next as a republican party. >> so, look, he has no problem getting in the mud and getting nasty, okay? against anyone and everyone. so when it comes to you, he talks about, you know, when you were not -- missing as governor because you were having an ex a extramarital affair. he loves to bring it up, here's what he said. >> the third one, mr. tallahassee trail or appalachian trail, he's the appalachian trail, right? the tallahassee trail is nice, too. but i think he was the appalachian trail. but he wasn't on the appalachian trail, he was in argentina. >> i don't know anything about the tallahassee trail.

but, look, what we both know, governor, is that this is what he lives for. he's going to just keep throwing stuff like this at you. are you ready for it, for the months of this that you are going to endure? >> i am. because i've got four sons that love me and that's what counts. i've got a god above that i know loves me. and again, you get those things right with a couple of friends and everything else is gravy. i think that his world view is entirely misguided, because it's all about him. at the end of the day, politics ought to be about the very people that we represent and attempt to represent. and so he can blow me up for something that i did ten years ago that i've apologized for profu profusely, that i've been on the journey of repentance and renewal and a second chance, which i believe is part and parcel of the christian faith. and most importantly, the people who knew me best gave me a second chance. after that, they sent me back to the united states congress to represent them in washington,

d.c. so, again, he's going to do what he's going to do, but i think what's important is to go back to, how is it that what we're talking about impacts your life? how does it improve the lives and the opportunities for your kids and your grandkids? and so i find it really perplexing that he can go on with attacks ad nauseam, but not talk about, for instance, the debt and the deficit and government spending that's spiraled under his watch. though he said he would do the opposite when he ran for office. >> he did. and you and i have talked about that, he did directly promise that and he has done the opposite. that's the facts. you have said fiscal responsibility is one of the key reasons that you're running, right? that you are running for a reason, for a cause. a specific policy cause. so i want to just understand, governor, where you stand. because you said that the president is taking us down a dangerous road financially and that you believe that we are heading toward the most significant financial storm since the great depression. that's what you said since you got in the race yesterday. you've been very clear, you have not minced words.

last month, though, you said you would vote for donald trump over a democrat, because he would be the republican nominee. is that still the case? i mean, is it -- would you end up voting for a guy who's going to put us into the most significant financial storm since the great depression? >> no, but let me be clear and explain where i stand on that. i'm an issues guy. and as you've correctly pointed out, the center focus of my one-day-old campaign is indeed on where we're going as a country financially and i believe issues on trade, i believe issues on civility, i believe issues on institutions and a lot of others, but we'll come back to that. as it relates to this issue of "could i vote for him?" the question is, compared to who? so the talk that i hear amongst democratic friends is elizabeth warren is on the rise, or bernie sanders is on the rise. that camp is on the rise. and my simple point would be, i will make that decision at the time, if i get there, based on who's closest to me on the

debt/deficit, and spending issues. i think that the president's destructive, but to this larger point, i think that some of the policies that have been proposed on the democratic side have been even worse with and i would make that judgment call based on what i saw at that time. >> okay. thank you so very much, governor. i appreciate talking to you again, sir. >> yes, ma'am. and next, we take you to one of the most beautiful places in america, where scientists have made an alarming discovery. plus, jeanne moos on what could be a presidential campaign first. [happy birthday music] ♪ ♪ don't get mad, put those years to work with e*trade.

now, there's skyrizi. i have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. 3 out of 4 people achieved... ...90% clearer skin at 4 months... ...after just 2 doses. skyrizi may increase your risk of infections... ...and lower your ability to fight them. before treatment your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection... ...or symptoms such as fevers,... ...sweats, chills, muscle aches or coughs... ...or if you plan to or recently received a vaccine. i feel free to bare my skin. visit skyrizi.com.

our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy! whoo-hoo! great-tasting ensure. with nine grams of protein and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. ensure, for strength and energy. and twenty-six vitamins and minerals. you may be at increased risk for pneumococcal pneumonia - a potentially serious bacterial lung disease that can disrupt your life for weeks. in severe cases, pneumococcal pneumonia can put you in the hospital. it can hit quickly, without warning, making you miss out on what matters most. just one dose of the prevnar 13® vaccine can help protect you from pneumococcal pneumonia. it's not a yearly shot. prevnar 13® is approved for adults to help prevent

infections from 13 strains of the bacteria that cause pneumococcal pneumonia. don't get prevnar 13® if you have had a severe allergic reaction to the vaccine or its ingredients. adults with weakened immune systems may have a lower response to the vaccine. the most common side effects were pain, redness and swelling at the injection site, limited arm movement, fatigue, headache, muscle pain, joint pain, less appetite, vomiting, fever, chills, and rash. ask about prevention. ask your doctor or pharmacist about prevnar 13®. tonight, the house set to vote this week to block offshore drilling in places like the arctic national wildlife refuge. and our bill weir discovered

there are already dramatic environmental changes impacting alaska as we speak. >> reporter: take a trip across alaska this summer, from the iceless north to the smoky south. and you'll see that when it comes to alarming changes, the last frontier feels like the first in line. >> this is insane. >> reporter: fire season used to end on august 1st, like rainy clockwork, but it is so hot and dry, the swan lake fire has been burning for three months. and the most populous part of the state is swallowing more smoke than ever before. >> if you look at the actual observations, we have had more than twice as many smoky hours in 2019 than any other season. and in fact, almost as many as all other years combined. >> reporter: and when anchorage is hotter than key west on the fourth of july, it can turn the steady drip of a glacier into something much more dramatic. >> reporter: that was last month

at the spencer glacier, just one of dozens of melting red flags. >> this whole lake was -- there was no lake in early 1950s. >> really? >> right. >> so the ice went all the way down -- >> to the end of the lake down there. >> right. >> reporter: a recent study finds that since the '60s, melting alaskan glaciers have contributed more to sea level rise than greenland, antarctica or any other part of the world. >> reporter: since every one of these molecules that goes into the ocean goes everywhere, this is not just a changing alaskan landscape story, this is a miami story. this is a charleston and san francisco bay story. >> you know, once this water melts off and goes into the ocean, you know, as long as we have all of this carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, it's not coming back here. >> reporter: health scientists like michael hahn are equally worried about changes harder to see, like new kinds of ticks bringing new kinds of disease north. and when dr. jeffrey domain

studied insect bite trends since the '90s, he found that way up in the arctic circle stings from yellow jacket wasps jumped. >> the queens are now surviving. so the more queens, the more colonies. the more colonies, the more yellow jackets. >> reporter: and then there are the fish so vital to this economy. while bristol bay saw another epic salmon run, more and more streams are just too hot for the fish to spawn. >> the temperatures we saw this summer are what we expected for 2069. >> really? >> we're 50 years ahead of where we thought we would be for stream temperatures. so that's very alarming. >> reporter: meanwhile, out at sea, this research team from noaa is spending the summer measuring all kinds of arctic change, including those at the bottom of the food chain. >> we are looking at harmful algae blooms, though. >> okay. >> so they're taking sample for toxins in the water from harmful algae. >> it's warmer if they're coming up farther north, right? >> and sooner, maybe.

that's a big concern for the communities. that's food safety. >> reporter: this state is such a gorgeous reminder of how earth's goldilocks climate held so many forms of life together in harmony. but in a too-hot future, with more fire than ice, what comes next is anyone's guess. bill weir, cnn, anchorage. >> incredible story. next, jeannie, on the yang gang and andrew yang at new heights. there are three words when you live with migraine... "i am here." aim to say that more with aimovig. a preventive treatment for migraine in adults that reduces the number of monthly migraine days. for some, that number can be cut in half or more. don't take aimovig if you're allergic to it. allergic reactions like rash or swelling can happen hours to days after use. common side effects include injection site reactions and constipation. aim to be there more. talk to your doctor about aimovig.

o♪ ozempic®! ♪ oh! oh! (announcer) people with type 2 diabetes are excited about the potential of once-weekly ozempic®. in a study with ozempic®, a majority of adults lowered their blood sugar and reached an a1c of less than 7 and maintained it. oh! under 7? (announcer) and you may lose weight. in the same one-year study, adults lost on average up to 12 pounds. oh! up to 12 pounds? (announcer) a two-year study showed that ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. oh! no increased risk? (announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may happen, including pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy

or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase the risk for low blood sugar. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. i discovered the potential with ozempic®. ♪ oh! oh! oh! ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) if eligible, you may pay as little as $25 per prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.

because there's always another team looking to punch one in. a spectacular touchdown grab with nfl redzone from nfl network on xfinity, you get every touchdown from every game on sunday afternoons, all season long. watch every breakout star, every heart-pounding running attack, and every big time defensive stop. sundays were made for football on xfinity. that's simple, easy, awesome. add the sports entertainment package for nfl redzone. click, call, or visit a store today to learn more.

here's jeanne moos. >> reporter: it used to be that dancing or the inability to distance -- ♪ so, donald, donald, stand by me ♪ >> reporter: -- was the measure of a politician's hip factor. ♪ >> reporter: but now, the bar has been lifted, much higher thanks to democratic presidential candidate andrew yank's crowd surfing. [ chanting: andrew yang ] >> reporter: oops, don't drop im! haven't crowd surfed in a while, yang tweeted. supporters chimed in, may i say you are officially cooler than barack obama? the hashtag, yang surfing surfaced. >> the opposite of donald trump

is an asian man who likes math. >> reporter: supporters wear hats who say, math, make america think harder. but some didn't think much of yang's crowd surfing calling it yang's howard dean moment. >> and north dakota and new mexico! >> reporter: the overenthusiastic dean scream was often blamed for bringing his presidential campaign to a screeching halt. >> and then we're going to washington, d.c. to take back the white house! yeah! >> reporter: will andrew yank some day regret his crowd surfing? actually, he wasn't the first. almost 20 years ago, conservative presidential candidate alan keyes lowered himself into a mosh pit, egged on by michael moore. you know, there are easier ways for candidates to evaluate themselves. remember beto o'rourke's penchant for jumping on counters and even minivans? >> thank you for allowing me to stand on your counter. >> reporter: and now we have

andrew yang to thank for political crowd surfing on the very same day dog surfing took place in delmar beach, california. one big difference, when yang got done surfing, he didn't shake. jeanne moos, cnn, new york. >> thanks for watching. anderson starts now. good evening and thanks for joining us. there is breaking news tonight that a member of president trump's cabinet threatened top-level firings at noaa after the national weather service's birmingham, alabama, office contradicted the president's false tweet about hurricane dorian. we've also learned, and this is a cnn exclusive that u.s. intelligence polled the very high-level agent spy out of russia in part out of concern that the president might some how blow this individual's cover. we'll have more on both of those stories tonight. but we begin with the president's invitation, now revoked, to the taliban. had