that breaking news and the ukraine story caps a day of escalating developments. it isn't just hearsay or a lone phone call or not even the president on the south lawn with an open, out loud request for china to investigate a political opponent. not anymore. tonight new evidence that points to the president and/or his administration in a systematic, sustained and apparently sweeping fashion using the instruments of government for his own personal and political gain. and now it's firsthand evidence. text messages released to house investigators last night that show an effort to get ukraine to announce investigations that would benefit the president, including investigations connected to joe biden, including an explicit quid pro quo for ukraine. do you this for us, and we will give you something you want. the players did it, some eagerly, others reluctantly as the president was withholding military aid and dangling a face to face meeting with ukraine's president. carrots and sticks.

the intelligence community inspector general testified in private today. sources tell us he gave the house intelligence committee documents showing his work to corroborate the whistle-blower's complaint. we also now have the opening statement and text messages supplied by kurt volker, the president's former special envoy for ukraine. here's part of a july 19th exchange between volker and gordon sondland, republican fund-raiser and ambassador to the european union. sondland writes, looks like potus call tomorrow. i spoke directly to zelensky and gave him a full briefing. he's got it. volker responds, good. had breakfast with rudy this morning. teeing up call withier mac monday must have helped. most important is for zelensky to say he will help the investigation. then on the morning of the july 25th call between president trump and the president of ukraine, ambassador volker messages sondland. quote, heard from white house. assuming president z convinces trump he will investigate, get to the bottom of what happened

in 2016, we will nail down date for visit to washington. but that did not happen. instead, by september 1st with military aid to ukraine still on hold, top u.s. diplomat to ukraine bill taylor was texting sondland, are we now saying that security assistance and white house meeting are conditioned on investigations, to which gordon sondland replies, call me. that's just a sampling of evidence and the picture it paints. meantime in the face of all this, president trump, also known as his own best whistle-blower, went on the south lawn again, still trying to sell the idea that none of this had anything to do with the bidens or 2016. no, none of it. only corruption. just listen. >> everything to me is about corruption. i don't care about biden's campaign, but i do care about corruption. what i want to do and i think i have an obligation to do it, probably a duty to do it, corruption. we are looking for corruption. >> whether anyone believed him

hardly matters because sometimes in the same breath he was also saying this. >> we are looking for corruption. when you look at what biden and his son did and when you look at other people, what they've done -- and i believe there was tremendous corruption with biden. but i think there was beyond -- i mean beyond corruption having to do with the 2016 campaign and what these lowlifes did to so many people, to hurt so many people in the trump campaign, which was successful despite all of the fighting us. i mean despite all of the fairness. so we are looking at corruption. we're not looking at politics. we're looking at corruption. >> and so were house democrats, only they're looking straight down pennsylvania avenue. that's where we also find cnn's jim acosta. jim, has there been any reaction to the subpoena from the white house this evening? >> reporter: there has, john. the white house press secretary stephanie grisham released a

statement a short while ago essentially saying that the house democrats are wasting the american people's time and money with these requests for information. although we should point out this is not a request. this is a subpoena, and it's something that they have to comply with. we should point out in that statement coming from the press secretary, john, they're not saying we're not going to cooperate with this, and that same sentiment goes for the vice president's office. they also released a statement this afternoon because they've been requested that they turn over information relevant to this investigation, and they're saying they don't take this very seriously at this point. they don't see it as a serious matter or a request coming from house democrats. again, in ta statement, they're not saying they're not turning over any information. that's important. >> it is important. jim, to what extent is the white house concerned with the release of these text messages which paint as clear a picture as you can get of a quid pro quo? >> reporter: i think they are concerned about this, john. i think that is why you saw the president almost in a robotic fashion. he sounded as though he had

overlearned his talking points today, talking over and over again about how he's trying to root out corruption and not trying to get dirt on former vice president on joe biden despite having said just that one day earlier in his calls to ukraine and china, to help him dig up dirt on the bidens for the 2020 campaign. i will tell you i did talk to a source familiar with the impeachment deliberations going on behind closed doors inside the white house over here, and, you know, one of the things they were looking at, john, was sending out a letter today on behalf of the white house, on behalf of the administration, saying they're not cooperating with this inquiry until house democrats have a formal impeachment inquiry vote. that letter was never produced by the white house today, and we're told it may come perhaps on monday. but, john, i'm told by a source close to these talks that there's a bit of an internal debate going on inside the president's impeachment preparation team as to whether or not sending off that letter is a good idea. so it sounds as though they're beginning to grasp the

seriousness of this situation, and it couldn't be more serious at this point. >> that's an interesting delay. jim acosta, thank you very much. joining us now, a member of the house intelligence committee, democratic congressman andre carson. i know you took part in the questioning of the intelligence community inspector general, michael atkinson today. i want to get that in a second. first i want to ask you about the subpoena delivered to the white house today. what happens if they don't comply? >> well, then we take it a step further. people have been talking about contempt and other things, but my hope is the white house officials will do their job and be cooperative. >> that's your hope. if they don't, would you see that as grounds for an article of impeachment as it was with richard nixon during watergate? >> oh, without question. i think we're already there. i think the american people are there. democrats, republicans, and

independents, people are sick and tired of the theater that is the white house, of this political pageantry, the trivializing of our government, our three systems of government, our three branches of government. you know, we still haven't dealt with infrastructure. we still haven't dealt with education. we still haven't dealt with national security in a meaningful way that doesn't trivialize immigrants and muslims and people of color. and so we have a lot on our plate that we have to deal with that our constituents are expecting us to deal with. but because president trump doesn't want to deal with the issues at hand, he involves us in this pageantry. and what he has done is self-serving, and it shows he's unfit to be president. >> i'm sure next week is, in fact, infrastructure week, but we'll have to wait and see if they in fact deliver on that. now as to the questioning of the intelligence community inspector general, what did you learn inside those hearings? >> well, what i will say, i

think that the inspector general takes his job very seriously. i think that he too was and his concerned about whistle-blower complaints and the safety and security of the whistle-blower. and our job as the committee is to make sure that we secure those pipelines of community case that other whistle-blowers can come forth with complaints, with criticisms, and they can do so without fear of retaliation. >> it's our reporting that he explained how he worked to corroborate the whistle-blower claims. is it fair to say that's what happened? >> i think that's fair to say. >> there's also so much evidence that is out in the open. since this whistle-blower first made his or her report, we've now seen the notes or the rough transcript of the phone call with the president. we've now seen these text messages. so i think one question americans have is, did he

provide anything more than that? are there even more witnesses, or is there more evidence that the american people don't know about? >> that's why it's critically important that the white house is cooperative with congress, that if they have nothing to hide, then they should work in cooperation with our committee chairs and work in cooperation with the subpoenas that have been issued. >> but does he have corroboration beyond that which has already been made public? >> well, i think as the days unfold, as the hours unfold, that remains to be seen. i mean there's only so much that i can say and that i'm willing to say. but it is clear that donald trump has trivialized the presidency. he's made a mockery of the presidency. we have a president who is a developer. you would think that infrastructure would be easy for him, but he's in over his head. we've seen meltdown after meltdown. kudos to our friends in the fourth estate for informing the

american people in a very clear and succinct way, but members of congress have a duty. we can't be afraid. urging my republican colleagues who fear one tweet from the president could jeopardize their re-election efforts to think critically about the preservation of our republic and our democracy and help us get donald trump out of the white house. >> the president seems to be utilizing what i would call the a few good men defense, which is now to say, you're damn right i did. he's basically saying, yeah, i had this phone call. i said what i said. but there's nothing wrong with that. to what extend do you think that is convincing to people in the country? >> well, the emperor is without clothes now. i think that he's surrounded himself with people who are unwilling to challenge him in a very healthy and firm way and a strong way and an aggressive way. those folks who have been the most outspoken and who have been

cheerleaders for donald trump have unceremoniously been fired. so he doesn't have loyalty to the people he demands loyalty from. so for me, as a hoosier, it's about being focused on doing what my constituents sent me to congress to do, and that's making sure we preserve the republic. and i, chairman schiff, and other members of the intelligence committee, we serve very honorably. we take our commitment very seriously. we want to get to the bottom of this and make sure the whistle-blower is protected and he or she doesn't face retaliation in the process. >> congressman carson, thank you very much for being with us this evening. >> a pleasure. thank you. more now on the breaking news as well as all we're learning from kurt volkevolker' 9 1/2 hours of testimony to congress. in his opening statement, just released a few hours ago, he said he found himself faced with a choice, quote, to be aware of a problem and ignore it or rather to accept what it was my responsibility to try to fix it.

joining us, someone who knows what that's like, former nixon white house counsel john dean. also joining us as well, chief political analyst gloria borger, jeffrey toobin and van jones, host of cnn's the van jones show. jeffrey toobin, i want to start with you with the news of the last hour or so. the subpoena that has gone to the white house now from these committees, what does that change? >> it's actually very important because people may remember that ever since the democrats have taken over the house of representatives, they've sent a lot of subpoenas to the white house, many of which have not been responded to, have not had the information or the testimony supplied. and the democrats have gone to court. and those cases are, as court cases tend to be, on a slow boat to nowhere. nothing is much happening. this is different because it's quite clear, as you said with congressman carson, that if the president refuses to honor these subpoenas, they are simply not going to go to court. they are going to add another

article of impeachment just as there was an article of impeachment against richard nixon that the house judiciary committee passed in 1974 on the ground that he is not cooperating with congress. the difference between going to court and an article of impeachment is a big difference. >> it's part of the speed of all of this, which seems to be remarkable over the last two weeks. democrats are now saying we're not waiting for anything anymore. >> the speed is remarkable. we've gone in such a short period of time from whispers and rumors to a whistle-blower complaint to actual transcript to text messages to a confession on the white house lawn in like ten days. this took two years in the white house process. so, you know, we are -- i think things are moving very, very fast. if the democrats say, listen, we're not fooling around anymore as they've been saying, they're not going to go to court. give us what we want or that's going to be another charge against you. that is a big escalation in this overall drama. >> gloria, listening to jim acosta, he pointed out the

official white house response from stephanie grisham tonight wasn't a no. it wasn't a, no, you're going to get nothing and like it. they just said this doesn't change anything. do you think the threat of this being an article of impeachment has changed the scenario for them? >> not yet. i don't think so. i think they can stonewall so long as they have the support of republicans and that's if that starts to crumble, should that start to crumble, i think they may rethink their strategy. but right now the strategy is, this is about the do-nothing democrats as they say. this is a kangaroo court as stephanie grisham said. and the republicans, if you notice, continue to defend the white house, not saying what donald trump did is okay, but rather talking about democrats and saying, you know, they wanted to get rid of him since he was elected, and this is nancy pelosi's revenge and all of rest of it. so should that support that he now has change -- and i think

it's softer than it was during mueller obviously because they're not defending donald trump on the issue. and should that change, then maybe donald trump's strategy will change. but right now, i think he continues to stonewall and say, okay. add another article to peop impeachment. >> they're not defending the stub stance. they're attacking the process. james dean, i was asking congressman carson about this, whether when they were talking to the inspector general, any new evidence came out. there's so much evidence out there already, including these text messages, including the transcript of the phone call. do you think that the net will widen anymore? will there be still additional witnesses who can add more to this? >> i think there will be. each witness that is appearing willingly is adding more to the list. that happened when ambassador volker was up there yesterday. it was i'm sure something in the inspector general's testimony

the committee would like to know more about. and of course they are sending subpoenas. i must say, john, i'm not very hopeful that's going to change any of the dynamics of this. nixon totally stonewalled all of the subpoena requests. yes, it was added as an article of impeachment. he didn't care. in fact, that was the weakest article that was voted against him by the committee, 21-17. didn't even carry all the democrats. so i think they're not particularly worried about their stonewalling strategy. >> very important context. we're going to pick this up after the break. we've also got reaction tonight, sharp reaction from former vice president joe biden. and later, some inklings of reaction from the gop but also a fair amount of avoidance. that and more as our "360" coverage continues. we used to love going out with julia and mike, but since they bought their new house... which menu am i looking at here? start with "ta-paz." -oh, it's tapas. -tapas. get out of town. it's like eating dinner with your parents.

sandra, are you in school? yes, i'm in art school. oh, wow. so have you thought about how you're gonna make money? at least we're learning some new things. we bundled our home and auto with progressive, saved a bunch. oh, we got a wobbler. progressive can't protect you from becoming your parents, but we can protect your home and auto when you bundle with us. that's what the extra menu's for. when you bundle with us. pain happens. saturdays happen. aleve it. aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol. when pain happens, aleve it. all day strong.

and i...was... take shocked.test. right away, called my mom, called my sisters. i'm from cameroon, congo, and...the bantu people. i had ivory coast, and ghana...togo. i was grateful... i just felt more connected...to who i am. new features. greater details. richer stories. get your dna kit today at ancestry.com. if ylittle thingsate tcan be a big deal., that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently.

with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting. otezla is associated with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. as your second cousin and number one broker... you're welcome. remember, carl, we haven't been investing with you for a while. hmmm? because schwab makes planning for things like this easier. yeah, with schwab we get automated investing and integrated planning help. for a low monthly subscription price. why would schwab do that? they help you plan for the things that matter. subscription pricing... ...schwab! introducing subscription pricing with one-on-one guidance.

schwab intelligent portfolios premium, a modern approach to wealth management. this melting pot of impacted species. everywhere is going to get touched by climate change. a big day of breaking news in the ukraine investigation, including a house subpoena

tonight to the white house for ukraine documents and, separately, a letter seeking documents from the vice president. also today, reaction from joe biden. >> all this talk of the president about corruption comes from the most corrupt president we've had in modern history. he's the definition of corruption. he's indicted himself by his own statements. this is not about me. it's not about my son. he talks about how we should handle whistle-blowers. he talks about there will be a civil war. this is ta guy that's unhinged. he is unhinged. this guy like all bullies is a coward. he does not want to run against me. >> back now with our team of experts. van, you saw the former vice president fighting back there. how do you assess how he is handling this as of tonight? >> look, i mean he's actually making the most important point. what is all this about? why do we have all this shenanigans, all this nonsense?

because the idea of trump the invincible, the trump zilla, tre trump-rex is not true. he is terrified of joe biden. he saw the same data that showed joe biden would beat him like a drum, and they don't want to have to run against him. they want to dirty him up, and i think it's important for joe biden to point that out. at the root of it, that's what this is about. when you talk to republicans, the one democrat they say -- even trump supporters -- they would consider joe biden. they're trying to take him out. >> there's, what, two weeks before the cnn debate on this. i wonder how that will factor in when the democrats are on the stage with each other. >> well, i mean what's been interesting is that there has been a closing of the ranks. nobody is saying, oh, well, maybe we should be talking about hunter biden. i think all democrats understand that not only is this unjust and illegitimate behavior on the part of the president. the reason is because of the

fear of joe biden. >> so, gloria, the white house response insofar as there is a coordinated response, how would you explain it right now because we were talking before about how republicans in general are attacking the process, not the substance. >> exactly. >> but i have begun to hear an argument from republicans, current office holders and former ones also, that they might be settling on an argument, well, this is all bad, but it's not impeachable. >> right. this is not criminal. they're not talking about abuse of power. and they're sort of ducking and covering, and they're not really willing to engage on the notion that what trump did was beyond trump being trump. and of course i wouhe would nev sell out the country for his own personal political gain. so there's no war room because what would you defend? the facts are the facts. so there isn't any war room. there's donald trump and his executive time, tweeting. and there's members of congress

right now on the republican side who are saying, well, this is really bad for us because we don't want donald trump to be his own spokesman in this case because he digs himself in a hole deeper every day. now, i will tell you that i spoke with someone today who speaks with the president regularly, and i said, so how does he sound to you because we know how he sounds publicly. this person said to me, he sounds astonishingly calm privately given all his public fury, which makes me wonder is donald trump doing what he does best, which is stir the pot, have a fight, and pound somebody and pound the democrats so he can win? >> jeff, you're laughing. >> just, you know, donald trump is the one who got elected president, so i think we always need to remember -- >> exactly, yes. >> but the idea that is playing some four dimensional chess where getting impeached is like

some secret weapon. >> no. >> of his, that seems a little contrived. >> all he knows how to do is fight, and i think what this person was saying to me is that donald trump likes to fight. and so privately he doesn't sound the way he does publicly because he is engaging in a fight which he likes and which he wants to lead, and that's what's driving republicans in the senate a little bit crazy. >> he may be fighting with conduct and comments that end up being impeachable. >> exactly. >> is the risk there. >> exactly. >> john dean, to that end, you wrote -- and i want to quote here -- it's very possible that president trump wants to be impeached and convicted and leave office as a martyr. you really believe that? >> well, i was running different combinations through my head as to why he would be behaving the way he does, where he walks out on the south lawn, and he admits he's using other countries to get dirt on his opponents. i mean that's just not -- that's

not really rational. john, what troubles me most, though, is the democrats are not really pointing out how grave his behavior is. what he's doing is he's attacking the sovereignty of our country. he's letting other foreign nations have a say in our democracy. this is more fundamental at his level than just a simple solicitation crime, which it is. it really undergirds the entirety of our processes and our systems. so i think it's very serious stuff, and democrats need to talk about that more. >> thank you very much. again, ask yourself what would happen if every candidate for office solicited help from any other country he or she wanted at all times with impunity? think of what that would mean for the electoral system. thank you all, everyone. up next, what a former director of national intelligence makes of the house subpoena and texts and some brand-new reporting just out tonight about how the president behaves on phone calls with

foreign leaders. james clapper joins us next. imagine a world where nothing gets in the way of doing great work. where an american icon uses the latest hr tools to stay true to the family recipe. where a music studio spends less time on hr and payroll, and more time crafting that perfect sound. where the nation's biggest party store can staff up quickly as soon as it's time for fun. this is the world of adp. hr, talent, time, benefits and payroll. designed for people. wheyou want relief... fast. only thermacare ultra pain relieving cream has 4 active ingredients to fight pain 4 different ways. get powerful relief today, with thermacare.

asbut when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls... you can never seem to get anywhere. that's why dell technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. ♪ a revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. so you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward.

the final horn doesn't have to mbecause with nhl center ice on xfinity you get up to 40 out-of-market games per week. and with the all-new xfinity sports zone, you get everything nhl all in one place, even notifications about your favorite teams. watch every barn burner, barreling check, and all the top shelf action. plus get instant access to your teams with the power of your voice. that's simple, easy, awesome. say nhl center ice into your voice remote to check out a free preview.

don't miss out. more now on breaking news tonight. the tidal wave of news all week and everything we're learning about the ukraine affair. joining me now, retired lieutenant general james clapper, former director of national intelligence and cnn national security analyst. he's also author of "facts and fears: hard truths from a life in intelligence." director, let me ask you about this house subpoena that went out tonight to the white house for documents and information connected to the president's phone call with the leader of ukraine. if you could find out more information about what we have

now read in black and white, not just there but in the text messages surrounding it, what more information do you feel there is to learn? >> well, i think it would be interesting, john, to know any supporting documentation and others who may have been witting or knowledgeable of this phone call. and i think it would be very interesting if there is an actual word-for-word transcript because all we've seen is, as damning as it is, but it was a summary prepared by the white house. and there are some interesting format contrasts that i noticed from similar memorandum of calls that i saw in the last administration, you know, the use of ellipses and this sort of

thing that arouses curiosity whether that was an actually comprehensive and accurate portrayal of the actual phone call. so that's one thing i'd be interested in. >> it would be interesting because if there is a watered-down version, it would be hard to imagine what the even more damning version would be. >> it could be, but that's something, again, i think the democrats would want to examine. >> so there's a "washington post" piece out that cites a former white house official saying, quote, there was a constant undercurrent in the trump administration of senior staff who were genuinely horrified by things they saw that were happening on these phone calls, referring to phone calls with foreign leaders. if that is, in fact, the case, if there are many senior staffers who were horrified, would that type of evidence be in the documentation that might be turned over in a subpoena? >> well, it could be if there were any written documentation reflecting that concern. i found that article interesting but not surprising because i

think the president, as we have come to know, says and tweets a lot of cringeworthy things that probably staffers in the white house would just as soon he didn't say. >> where's the line? this is so important because one of the defenses we're hearing is this is just the way he talks. there's a line between just the way he talks and dangerous and perhaps actionable, correct? >> well, exactly. i mean if he makes some kind of a commitment that perhaps he doesn't know the history about and shouldn't make, imagine all kinds of scenarios here where he may have said things that he shouldn't have been. one of the things that struck me, of course, and has concerned me from the get-go has been how solicitous he has been with president putin of russia.

that seems to be, according to the "post" article, seems to be borne out >> what about china not even on a secret phone call? he pleaded with china to investigate joe biden from the south lawn. as someone who's devoted your life to intelligence and national security, how did that strike you? and based on what you know from eves dropping on conversation from china for decades, how do you think they would respond to something like that? >> well, you know, if we weren't 2 1/2 years into this administration, that would really be jaw-dropping. i was really taken aback by that. here we're going to ask an adversary of ours -- and that's what china is -- who of course are famous for practicing the rule of law, and we're going to ask them to investigate a political opponent. and he does it brazenly and in the open. in a way he's sort of indicting himself.

now, the problem is that oftentimes whatever the standard is becoming, whatever president trump says or does, that becomes the normal, and it's by definition acceptable and appropriate. well, it isn't. >> director clapper, thank you very much for being with us tonight. appreciate it. >> thanks, john. up next, the republican side. what republican lawmakers are saying and what they're not, and why not. we'll speak with two republican non-lawmakers about the thundering silence. i can't believe it.

what? that our new house is haunted by casper the friendly ghost? hey jill! hey kurt! movies? i'll get snacks! no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars

on our car insurance with geico. i got snacks! ohhh, i got popcorn, i got caramel corn, i got kettle corn. am i chewing too loud? believe it! geico could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. ♪ as your life grows, so do your needs. ♪ and with bank of america and merrill, the benefits you get can grow, too. as a preferred rewards member, you can enjoy priority service and exclusive discounts... so your growing life can be more rewarding, too. ♪ what would you like the power to do? ♪ what would you like the power to do? we're oscar mayer deli fresh your very first sandwich,m... your mammoth masterpiece. and...whatever this was. because we make our meat with the good of the deli and no artificial preservatives. make every sandwich count

with oscar mayer deli fresh.

of the 85 republicans on capitol hill that cnn has contacted to see if they have concerns about president trump's call for china to investigate the biden clan, few have responded. congressman will hurd on "new day" this morning called iter itible. senator ben sasse says it's a matter for american, not chinese law. senator mitt romney gave the most forceful rebuke of the president's comments saying today, quote, when the only american citizen president trump singles out for china's investigation is his political opponent in the midst of the

democratic nomination process, it strains credulity to suggest it is anything other than politically motivated. by all appearances, the president's brazen and unprecedented appeal to china to investigate joe biden is wrong and appalling. but that was it really for republicans with misgivings. senator marco rubio, for instance, on the other hand, says we're all overplaying the president's comments. >> i don't think it's a real -- i think he did it to dig you guys. i think he did it to provoke you g guys. he plays it like a violin. that's not a real request. >> it's our fault for actually listening to what the president said out loud on the south lawn. joining us now, cnn political commentator and former communications director for senator ted cruz, amanda carpenter. she's also the author of the gas lighting america. and republican strategist, rick wilson, who is author of

"everything trump touches dies." amanda, basically why is it that mitt romney is stand ago loing here? maybe in part because he just won re-election and is safe. he's the first one to stick his neck out in a meaningful way, but they're not going to be able to hide froeorever. most of these talking points, you're going to run out of runway. last week they kept saying this is hearsay. well here's the transcript. here's the reality. we're all on fifth avenue now. he did the deed in the middle of the street, admitted it, we all saw it. at some point you're going to have to line up on one side of the street or the other. are you going to line up behind donald trump, the guy who is trying to cheat to win an election, goading on foreign interference, or the other side and support democracy and free and fair elections? you can't hide out in this forever. i just think mitt romney happened figure out that he had to make a choice first and was

one of the first people to realize that. people have to fall in line sooner or later. >> but, rick, if the transcript of the phone call isn't enough, if the text messages aren't enough, if the very public plea to china to investigate a political opponent is not enough, what will it take for republicans to be outraged at the president's actions? >> john, what we know about this president, what we know about the republican members of the senate in particular is they are terrified of this man. they are terrified of his mob. they are terrified of his tweeting. they are terrified if he says something about them, they'll get a primary opponent or something worse will happen to them. they have lived under this cloud for three years now where donald trump's word is law, and so, look, senator flake was correct when he said there's a good number of people -- he thought it was 30. i think it's probably around 25 that in a secret ballot would vote to impeach donald trump and convict him. >> really? >> because they -- yeah, really,

i do think that number is about right. they do not like this man. they lie to the people that they are elected by because donald trump does not represent any strain of conservatism most of them understand. so they're doing the best they can. they're making the best of it. they're passing their judges and hoping that's enough. but they really don't like the condition he puts them in, and there are serious people there in the senate who honestly understand this thing with a bit more granularity and honor than, say, a lindsey graham does. and they understand the threat that this poses to our country's national interests and our security, that donald trump is out trying to extort foreign powers to fulfill his campaign desires. it's a dangerous position, and they understand that. but they're too afraid to make a move for the most part. >> i think there's only one thing that has a shot at changing the dynamic in the senate, and you have to make it more painful for these senate republicans to support trump than to not. and the quickest way to do this is to go straight to the heart

of what mitch mcconnell cares the most about. mitch mcconnell cares most about staying senate majority leader. right now the republicans only have a three-seat majority. so there needs to be a campaign. if the democrats want to do this right, you need to attack those most vulnerable senate seats, arizona, colorado, and maine. those three senators shouldn't be able to get a coffee without somebody getting in their face to say what are you going to do to make our elections free and fair. that is the only way mitch mcconnell will move on this because i promise you, he cares more about being senate majority leader than donald trump being president. so if he has to make a choice between those two things, he will choose himself. >> rick, let me put this to you, if you are the democrats -- how do the democrats handle a statement like that which came from mitt romney today because for some of them, they're like really? that's it? you're just appalled, senator romney? what are you going to do about

it? is that the best response, or somehow being more receptive? >> strategically, the problem is a lot of democrats respond to these things with emotion and not strategy. and the emotion is to say, well, why aren't you doing more? why aren't you doing a bigger deal? why aren't you setting yourself on fire? the strategic response is to open a pathway and to say, this is the honorable thing to do. we hope other people follow him, and we hope other people recognize as senator romney did that donald trump is a man who has gone well beyond the law and the bounds of propriety and all the norms that have made america what it is and kept us safe. we believe that this is a smart -- you know, da, da, da, s but emotion always tends to triumph over strategy. >> thank you for being with me tonight. appreciate it. up next, more breaking news. a new update on the health of democratic presidential candidate bernie sanders and his heart condition. we're reporters from the new york times.

this melting pot of impacted species. everywhere is going to get touched by climate change. welcome to fowler, indiana. one of the windiest places in america. and home to three bp wind farms. in the off-chance the wind ever stops blowing here... the lights can keep on shining. thanks to our natural gas. a smart partner to renewable energy. it's always ready when needed. or... not. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing.

but family can only tell you sot much... about your history. i found some incredible records about samuel silberman... passenger manifests, census information, even wwi draft registration cards. the records exist... they're there, they're facts. that made it so real for me, it wasn't just a story anymore. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com

more breaking news now. bernie sanders, the sanders campaign, is confirming the 2020 democratic contenders suffered a heart attack earlier this week. sanders left a las vegas hospital earlier today after he had two stents placed in a blocked artery. in a tweet posted moments ago sanders says he's feeling so much better and adds he'll see everyone soon on the campaign trail. we would all welcome him back. i want to see chris cuomo and what the he's working on top of the hour. >> the biggest concern for the senator is his health and quick recovery. he looked good, his wife said he's good. we look forward to seeing him back out on the trail. "the new york times" is saying there may be another whistle-blower. this one had more firsthand access or understanding of what was going on than the

whistle-blower we know now from the intelligence community. now, i don't know why you need another one, now that you have volker. to your earlier point you were making with your guest, you got the text, you got volker. there's nothing anonymous about it. this is what happens when you deny the obvious, it keeps coming at you. >> that's right. the evidence is there but who knows what this other person has to say. chris, we're digging on that also. see you in a few minutes. just ahead, whistle-blowers who have changed the course of history. stick around. "fine. no one leaves the table until you're finished." "fine! we'll sleep here." "it's the easiest, because it's the cheesiest" kraft. for the win win.

thand find inspiration who win new places.ct... leading them to discover: we're woven together by the moments we share. everything you need, all in one place. expedia.

imagine a world where

nothing gets in the way of doing great work. where an american icon uses the latest hr tools to stay true to the family recipe. where a music studio spends less time on hr and payroll, and more time crafting that perfect sound. where the nation's biggest party store can staff up quickly as soon as it's time for fun. this is the world of adp. hr, talent, time, benefits and payroll. designed for people.

(classical music playing throughout) >> all right, before we get to ran ran randy kaye's report reading now from "the new york times" headline just out, a second official is weighing whether to blow the whistle on trump's ukraine dealings. the official a member of the intelligence community was interviewed by the specter general to corroborate the

original whistle-blower's account. now randy's report. >> you tell me what you know and i'll confirm. i'll keep you in the right direction if i can but that's all. just follow the money. >> reporter: he is perhaps the most famous whistle-blower in history, known simply as deep throat. in the 1970s, he helped take down president nixon by divulge critical information to "washington post" reporters bob woodward and carl bernstein. deep throat would set up secret meetings with woodward by drawing a clock with a specific time usually late at night on page 20 of woodward's copy of "the new york times." they would then meet at that time inside an underground parking garage. >> no, i'm not deep throat. >> reporter: in fact, he was. the mystery ended in 2005 when mark felt, the number two in command at the fbi in the early

70s revealed he was deep throat. also in the 1970s, military analyst daniel ellsberg earned a reputation as the most dangerous man in america for leaking a top study on the vietnam war known as "the pentagon papers." the pentagon papers showed the government mismanaged the vietnam war and lied about it. ellsberg was charged under the espionage act of 1917. with theft and conspiracy. but the charges were later dropped due to government misconduct. ellsberg's disclosures as a whistle-blower are credited with helping end the war. >> i couldn't care less about the punk. i wanted to discredit that kind of activity. >> reporter: decades later in 2013, former u.s. army soldier chelsea manning was convicted after selling -- sharing 750,000

documents with wikileaks. >> i stopped seeing statistics and information and i started seeing people. >> reporter: included in the leaked material, a video of iraqi civilians and journalists being killed by a u.s. helicopter in 2007. she was convicted and sentenced to 35 years for the leak, but president barack obama commuted her sentence in 2017. the same year manning was convicted whistle-blower edward snowden began leaking classified government material to the media and a documentary filmmaker. >> the more you're ignored, the more you're told it's not a problem until eventually you realize these things need to be determined by the public. >> reporter: snowden a former cia employee and nsa contractor shared documents from the national security agency about far reaching surveillance programs. >> peoples lives are at risk here because of data that mr.

snowden -- >> reporter: and he was charged with revealing classified information. he's living in exile in russia. randi kaye, cnn, new york. >> i am chris cuomo and welcome to prime time. breaking news a report of a second possible whistle-blower on ukraine. it's hard to know what more is needed because tonight we'll show that people put in place by this president felt what he was asking from ukraine was wrong. proof of an obvious expectation bayou crane that investigating biden would get them the relationship desired with trump. what do you say? let's get after it. >> announcer: this is cnn breaking news. >> this breaking news is from