your knees. he would have dropped to his knees. >> maybe only if you called him pierre delecto, jeanne moos cnn. >> oh, yeah. >> new york. >> thank you for joining us, anderson starts now. good evening, all roads lead to putin. that is what house speaker nancy pelosi famously said about president trump. tonight there's breaking news on what could be yet another road. "the washington post" tonight reporting on conversations the president had with vladimir putin and hungarian prime minister. the post headline, putin and hungary's orban helped sour trurp on ukraine, according to the report, the conversations reinforced president trump's perception of corruption in ukraine. the post reports neither orb a, n nor putin encouraged the president to see ukraine adds a source of dirt on joe biden nor

did they describe kiev as complic complicit. the post reports that their disparaging descriptions did reinforce the president's perceptions of ukraine to the dismay of some of his advisers. quote, over time you just see a wearing down of defenses a former white house official said describing the struggle to contest the influence of giuliani, putin and orban. pause to consider the inl pl implications. the leader of the country was telling this president not to trust ukraine, a country that russia seeks to dominate. joining us is the post john hudson who shares a byline on the story. what exactly happened in these conversations between president trump, putin, and orban. i understand at least one of the conversations orban was face-to-face in the white house and there wasn't anyone else present, is that right? >> that's right. u.s. officials described to the post an alarming sort of

evolution in president trump's view of zelensky and ukrainian officials in general. now, it started out a little bit positive. they had a congratulatory phone call, and u.s. officials were comfortable with the direction things were going. and then things turned sour, and so one conversation, for instance, he had with vladimir putin trump actually broached the subject of zelensky and said what do you think about him? and putin said according to a western official familiar with the conversation, that this is someone with -- this is a kbh d comedian, and this is someone who is linked to ukrainian corrupt oligarchs. this is somebody who has a long time oppositional and sort of tough with putin over a long period of time. and so these conversations added to each other and sort of reinforced trump's view already that ukrainian officials are corrupt, ukrainian officials did not want him to win the 2016 election, and that was a view that was very difficult for u.s.

officials to combat and counter act who saw ukraine as a country that they wanted to align with and strength within as it was fending off russian backed separatists in the middle east. >> the efforts by putin and orban were actually anticipated by national security officials. i mean, how did it go from, you know, folks in the trump white house, the national security team, you know, being concerned that putin and orban were going to be, you know, whispering in the president's ear about this to the point where they actually -- that actually happened? >> that's right. there was a very contentious decision over whether or not to invite victor orban to washington to have a meeting with president trump. this is something that gives a lot of credibility to leaders and a lot of u.s. officials saw the hungarian prime minister as someone who was part of a sort of right wing populist movement in europe that is sort of

antithetical to some western values, not helpful towards the fight to support ukraine against russia. that's for sure, and they opposed that position. of course, trump was very much open to it as he is open to many world leaders that are not necessarily allies with the united states, and so ultimately trump's desire to meet with this person who has been one of the most prominent backers of trump in europe, a continent that hasn't been necessarily warm to the president. he got that meeting, and in that meeting orban who is a skeptic of ukraine, some of that historical, some of that personal with the ukrainian president zelensky, again, reinforced a view of ukraine that is corrupt and not favorable to president trump, thus further reinforcing these negative views the president has. >> i also want to be clear about this. in the report you say that there's no indication that vice president biden came up in the if the's conversations with either putin or orban, it would

make sense for this -- for president trump who has now asked not only ukraine to look into the bidens but also china well-known for their, you know, fair investigations and treatment of any sort of suspect, it would make sense if you're asking china to investigate the bidens, why not ask, you know, vladimir putin. but there's no evidence that came up at all? >> right, he has outsourced that question pretty widely. there's no evidence that he outsourced that question and tried to get either the hungarians or the russians to get more information on biden specifically, but he was poking around, and he was asking, you know, the views on zelensky and he certainly got some answers on that. >> it's also amazing that his own people in the white house or at least those who were there, mattis and kelly, were concerned about isswhat putin might say t him, what the hungarian prime minister might say to him, and

nevertheless, they're gone, and he meets with the hungarian prime minister one on one, and it's not until later i understand that bolton and his counter part enter the room? >> absolutely, and you know, there have been a number of instances with which the president meets leaders, especially leaders who are not necessarily seen as friends of the united states, and there's not note takers in the room. there aren't a lot of the officials such as the national security adviser or the secretary of state who will be in the room sort of overseeing this, and that's why a lot of this testimony, especially with we're talking about senior state department official george kent who testified last week, they sort of pointed to these meetings and noticed a trajectory and a change in president trump's tone, but it's not like they have a lot of knowledge about what happened in those either because the details of these meetings are not widely disbur dispersed and disseminated within the white house and within the administration, and that's a pattern that has continued as the president becomes increasingly frustrated

by leaks of the content of those discussions. >> yeah, john hudson, stick around i want to bring in cnn senior political analyst davidger again and jeffrey toobin. shouldn't putin be the last person on the planet influencing how president trump feels about ukraine given the fact that putin has invaded crimea? >> absolutely, and it's hard to think of a more wholesome trio than giuliani, putin, and orban, you know. it is like what? what are we doing here? listen, a little context. it has been american foreign policy for some time now to support and strengthen ukraine, to come to the aid of those leaders. that's why we were sending them money because the russians had invaded their country, were threatening to dominate the country, and so the whole point of mattis and kelly and bolton was to reinforce the president and make sure he approached the ukrainians in a sense of trying to help them.

instead, what the president listened to with putin and orban and giuliani and it soured his view on the ukrainians and that instead of trying to go to support the ukrainians, that's when the president then instead went to them for a favor to dig up dirt in the political campaign. so i do think we see this from a foreign policy point of view as a very depressing disappointing and dangerous exercise of diplomacy by a president who simply isn't going to get reined in. that meeting with orban according to john went for an hour with no note taker. >> and you know, the president, you know, has suspicions about zelensky, and relationships with oligarchs, zelensky did, at least, run on an anticorruption platform and was won overwhelmingly given the fact he had no career in politics was a comedian, and the ambassador who

the president got rid of was actually spearheading anticorruption efforts in ukraine. last week you had nancy pelosi, reportedly telling the president that all roads lead to putin. here we are with yet another road leading to or from putin. >> and this was a big question instead the white house when the president wanted to make that july call to zelensky because he had already made a congratulatory call earlier in the year. they'd already spoken, gotten that out of the way, but people were surprised, we were told when we were reporting this out by the president wanting to make that phone call because before he had essentially dismissed zelensky believing he was just like his predecessor, he was going to be corrupt that he wasn't going to be able to make reforms or changes that the president now says he wanted to see, but of course also noting the way the president has reacted to these two people who were very anti-corruption and how the president has squared that with his insistence that this was all about corruption in ukraine when he was pushing them about joe biden and about that unsubstantiated theory really

pulls that into view for you, and it kind of answers that question that a lot of white house officials were even asking us about why it was the president all of a sudden wanted to make that call after two months before he had been pretty dismissive of the ukrainian leader from the get-go. >> i want to put on the screen sort of a time line to just kind of help sort through this. there's a lot going on. early may president trump speaks with president putin, may 9th, giuliani tells the "new york times" he's going to travel to ukraine and later says he isn't going. when people complain about it. may 14th trump tells vice president pence not to attend zelensky, the ukrainian president's inauguration. july 18th trump decides to withhold nearly 400 million in aid to ukraine that's already been passed by congress. july 25th is that trump and zelensky phone call. i mean, i don't know if it's, you know, if it begins with the call from putin, but there certainly is a lot of activity, a lot of dominos falling. >> especially when you combine this with what's come out in the depositions in congress. during this early summer period,

there is all this activity led by giuliani, which is about, you know, limiting our cooperation with the new president unless he comes across with the dirt on biden. st it's all going on at the same time. now, whether that originated with the phone call from putin in may or, you know, other sources from giuliani who has his own connections in ukraine, we certainly don't know that, but the thing about all the evidence is that it all fits together. i mean, it all fits together in an explanation that the president just didn't want anything to do with ukraine unless they could come across with dirt, and every piece of evidence that has come forward in the depositions and certainly in the partial transcript that we've all seen many times, it all points in the same direction. >> yeah, i mean, he's certainly not concerned about russian involvement in ukraine. he certainly doesn't seem to be concerned about crimea, he

certainly doesn't seem to be concerned about anything other than the dirt and, you know, this server. >> and he keeps talking about corruption. he's not interested in any corruption except hunter biden's alleged corruption. i mean, it's not like he's concerned with the wellbeing of the ukrainian people. it's only about finding out what hunter biden did in -- >> we've got to take a quick break. the former man in charge of russia operations, the cia reacts to the breaking developments in "the washington post." and later a republican congressman breaks ranks with the white house. more heat. -- more ahead. ahead. ♪ ♪

♪ everything your trip needs, for everyone you love. expedia. for everyone you love. my moderate to severe i ulcerative colitis.ing but i realized something was missing... me. the thought of my symptoms returning was keeping me from being there for the people and things i love most. so, i talked to my doctor and learned humira can help get, and keep, uc under control when other medications haven't worked well enough. and it helps people achieve control that lasts so you could experience few or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b,

are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, control is possible. ever since you brought me home, that day. i've been plotting to destroy you. sizing you up... calculating your every move. you think this is love? this is a billion years of tiger dna just ready to pounce. and if you have the wrong home insurance coverage, you could be coughing up the cash for this. so get allstate and be better protected from mayhem, like me-ow. performance comes in lots of flavors. so g♪ (dramatic orchestra) er protected from mayhem, there's the amped-up, over-tuned, feeding-frenzy-of sheet-metal-kind.

and then there's performance that just leaves you feeling better as a result. that's the kind lincoln's about. ♪ woman: what gives me confidence about investment decisions? rigorous fundamental research. with portfolio managers focused on the long term. who look beyond the spreadsheets to understand companies, from breakroom to boardroom. who know the only way to get a 360 view is to go around the world to get it. can i rely on deep research to help make quality investment decisions? with capital group, i can. talk to your advisor or consultant for investment risks and information.

talk to your advisor or consultant we make aspirin to help save lives during a heart attack... so it never stops the heart of a family. at bayer, this is why we science. returning to breaking news, there's new report in the "washington post" about russian hungarian efforts to sour trump on ukraine. as our own time line shows, they may have been pushing an open door. even before the conversations tv lawyer rudy giuliani was already pushing conspiracy theories to the president and the u.s. am bass ambassador to ukraine had already been recalled.

steve, i mean, you were russia operations division, does president trump seeking advice from putin and the hungarian prime minister in a private one on one conversation jeopardize national security? >> yeah, anderson, i mean, you've got this veritable buffet of horribleness in front of us. it's difficult to say which is the most horrible thing. that is certainly a terrible, terrible thing when you've got the president of the united states of america reaching out to a foreign leader and asking for that help, regardless of whether there's a quid pro quo. i mean, you look at the other stuff that's going on here, you've got basically the decimation of anybody in this administration who understands russia and who understands ukraine getting rid of all those people, ambassador yovanovitch, even john bolton, who replaces them, as you said rudy giuliani. then you've got the president consulting with vladimir putin and guys like two bit dictators, autocrats like viktor orban. you've got the state department. you've got all sorts of people

in your own government you can consult with. the amount of things that have gone wrong here, it's just befuddling and amazing to me. >> right, the idea that you're rejecting everybody who works at the state department and sending, you know, rudy giuliani to skulk about in ukraine and, you know, meet up with his friends who he's being paid by, who are taking him around to hunt down, you know, biden scoops in a server, i mean, it sounds almost like a joke, but the idea that it's actually real is extraordinary. >> yeah, i mean, it's horrific, and then you've got the president throwing ukraine under the bus essentially, vis-a-vis russia by saying, okay, the brain surgeons that i have working on this, the guys like giuliani and putin of course, and of course orban telling me, look, ukraine is a very corrupt place, not to be trusted, don't help them because of course that would be bad for russia, and he buys it. the president says yeah, i believe what vladimir putin tells me about this, and so i'll hold the money that they need so

badly. why? to thwart russian invasions and further annexation of crimea. how is this good for u.s. security i do not understand. >> right, and also as if there's no corruption in hungary or in vladimir putin's russia. i mean, steve, i also want to play this back and forth from one of the 2016 debates that kind of rings a bell right now. let's listen. >> 1,800 nuclear warheads and she's playing chicken. look, putin -- from everything i see has no respect for this person. >> well, that's because he's rather have a puppet as president of the united states. >> no puppet, no puppet. >> it's pretty clear -- >> you're the puppet. >> when yould you put this in t category of president trump acting as a puppet? >> if you look just over the past couple of weeks, who has benefitted out of this president's decision-making,

especially vis-a-vis foreign policy? it's got to be none other than vladimir putin. i mean, vladimir putin is now, you know, running up and down the syrian border with his military forces opposite turkey, you know, with russian flags going in to abandoned u.s. bases there and making a big propaganda deal of it. he's holding back funding or was holding back funding not empowering ukraine to fight back against russia. fighting within nato allies like turkey. vladimir putin wakes up in the middle of the night and thinks i must be dreaming, this is absolutely fabulous. it benefits nobody more than vladimir putin in my view. >> according to the "washington post" this information came from george kent the state department official who testified in front of congress last week. it's so interesting to me because for the last two years, trump, you know, supporters on television and elsewhere have been saying and the president himself has been saying nobody's been tougher on russia than donald trump, and really the only kind of main thing they look at is sanctions, which were

passed by congress, and they said oh, his actions in syria, you know, he bombed an airfield, and there was a fight between u.s. forces and russian-backed forces. the idea that anybody would say that this is not a gift to russia, what he has done in syria, there's no way around it. >> there is no way around it, anderson, and i pray we won't really understand what's happened here for years because some of these documents will be locked up and away from public view. i do want to go back to what jeffrey said about the more consistent complete picture is now emerging. i think there's something new about the picture that we're now seeing. in the beginning it sounded as if the call on july 25th might have been an insignificant call, maybe on a whim, who knows, the president has a busy day. he makes a call, how big a deal is that. it's now apparent from what we've learned from these courageous state department officials as well as others that this was a very big deal. it was central to his presidency.

president trump turned his foreign policy upside down in order to get this dirt out of ukraine. >> kaitlan collins, i mean, it does seem -- i think david sounds exactly right. >> well, and also we need to talk about one notable aspect of this, you were talking about the lack of officials who had been there before that were very aware or very cautious of putin and the president's relationship that's, you know, mattis, john kelly, john bolton, but also the presence of mick mulvaney as a central notable aspect of this. he was someone who at times overruled national security officials. he has his own national security adviser which is unusual for a chief of staff, and as we reported over the summer, he was locked in this feud with john bolton over the holdup of this ukrainian aid, which at the time we were reporting it out, people were confused by it and didn't understand the reason. there seems to be a role in all of this and why the president was able to sit down with these officials, have these conversations that have so clearly changed the trajectory of so many aspects of his presidency. >> the "washington post" saying

mulvaney was critical in terms of getting the hungarian prime minister to allow him to meet with the president, which a lot of folks, the adults previously hadn't, david gergen, kaitlan colli collins, thank you very much. the president lashed out at the media and what he called the phony emoluments clause, you know, the one in the constitution. we're keeping him honest next. when you look at the world,

what do you see? we see patterns. relationships. when you use location technology, you can see where things happen, before they happen. with esri location technology, you can see what others can't. ♪ the amazing new iphone has arrived. and so has t-mobile's newest signal. no signal goes farther or is more reliable. so you can get more out of the new iphone.

better battery life, new ultra-wide camera. and at t-mobile get unlimited for only $30/line for 4 lines on a network that goes farther than ever before. and right now, switch at a t-mobile store and get the new iphone 11 on us! only at t-mobile. woi felt completely helpless.hed online. my entire career and business were in jeopardy. i called reputation defender. vo: take control of your online reputation. get your free reputation report card at reputationdefender.com. find out your online reputation today and let the experts help you repair it. woman: they were able to restore my good name. vo: visit reputationdefender.com or call 1-877-866-8555. no matter what life throws down ♪

roomba is up for the challenge. only roomba uses 2 multi-surface rubber brushes that powerfully clean up debris on all your floors. and only the roomba i7+ system empties its bin into allergenlock™ bags that trap 99% of allergens. forget about vacuuming for months. if it's not from irobot, it's not a roomba™ that could allow hackers devices into your home.ys and like all doors, they're safer when locked. that's why you need xfinity xfi. with the xfi gateway, devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren't secure. and if someone trys we'll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it's connected, it's protected.

call, click, or visit a store today. if the new reporting tonight on the president putin and ukraine bears out, it adds yet another data point in the story and could raise more concerns about the president's conduct. we say yet more because the story hit just hours after the president spoke at length to reporters and provided foe and

friend alike plenty of new material to consider. he talked about impeachment. >> the president of the united states should be allowed to run the country, not have to focus on this kind of crap while at the same time doing a great job on syria and turkey and all of the other things that we're doing. >> doing a great job he said. that presumably includes his snap decision that the one and only place for next year's g-7 summit would be at doral. under pressure including from members of his own party he backed down from that on saturday. here's what he said about it today. >> doral was a very simple situation. i own a property in florida. i was going to do it at no cost or give it free if i got a ruling because there's a question as to whether or not you're allowed to give it because it's like a contribution to a country. i'd have to get a rulings, but i would have given it for nothing. >> keeping him honest. do you notice he said i as if i will give you the control for nothing as if he still has control over the business, which is weird because he claims he no longer has anything to do with

the company. remember as president-elect he said this? >> and what i'm going to be doing is my two sons, who are right here, don and eric are going to be running the company. they are going to be running it in a very professional manner. they're not going to discuss it with me. again, i don't have to do this. they're not going to discuss it with me. >> they're not going to discuss it with him he said right there, so if they don't discuss the business how would the president get a deal on the hotel he supposedly doesn't control and doesn't discuss with his sons who in between tweeting a lot and making campaign appearances and going on fox news allegedly run the trump organization. not that this would run afoul of the constitution or anything which specifically says and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, meaning the united states, shall without the consent of the congress accept of any president emolument to office or title of any kind whatever from any king,

prince, or foreign state. that's what the founders wrote and here's what the president said today. >> i don't think you people with this phony emoluments laws, and by the way, i would say that it's cost me anywhere from 2 to $5 billion to be president, and that's okay. between what i lose and what i could have made, i would have made a fortune if i just ran my business. i was doing it really well. i have a great business. i have the best properties. >> the best, great, the phony emoluments clause, and you know, the constitution phony, the best properties. he sure spends a lot of time as president promoting and playing golf at. tomorrow ambassador bill taylor who raised concerns about a quid pro quo in those text messages that have become public with another ambassador. earlier tonight i spoke with retiring republican florida congressman francis rooney. >> congressman rooney you said you find the whole situation with president trump and ukraine in your words quite troubling. to be clear, do you believe the

impeachment inquiry is a valid exercise of the house's power? the president obviously has called it a coup. >> i think it's fine to have the inquiry. i haven't heard anything yet that would tell me that we should impeach the president of the united states, but i'm very interested in hearing the rest of the testimony, particularly bill taylor this week and hopefully at some point ambassador bol ambassador bolton. >> how do you square the president's defense of his phone conversation with the president of ukraine. he said once again today that it was perfect. is there anything perfect about it in your opinion? >> well, i think it's confusing to me to mix business things of rudy giuliani with statecraft. it's also confusing to me to have amateur diplomats out there conducti conducting parallel diplomacy when we have professional diplomats doing their job in the ukraine. >> so the fact that it seemed like this policy to ukraine was

being run through rudy giuliani who also as you point out, has a long-standing business interests in ukraine and the region, i mean, is there anything that makes that even appropriate? i mean, is there any explanation that would sort of make that appropriate? >> no, that's where the rub comes in. the rub comes in that we have professional diplomats trying to do their job to root out corruption, and then we have giuliani parachuting in talking about corruption but maybe representing his customers. i don't know. i want to hear the rest of the testimony, especially john bolton. >> and that phone conversation, which is just a rough transcript, we don't have the actual word for word transcript which the president claims this was, but it's not, it is -- when the president, you know, the president of ukraine asks for a -- asks for -- talks about the importance of the military aid and the aid that's being held up and the president says that he would like -- he has a favor for

us and then he talks about, you know, crowd strike, this whole essentially conspiracy theory about the server being in ukraine, and then also about finding dirt on the bidens, does that not on its face seem wildly inappropriate? does that seem like a quid pro quo to you? >> well, it's inappropriate. it's bothersome, and it's especially bothersome to talk about the server, which our intelligence services have continued to say didn't exist. >> and mick mulvaney his admission, i mean, he didn't use the words quid pro quo but when asked by jonathan carl he said, yeah, we do this all the time, and he was specifically talking about the crowd strike ukraine server investigation. >> i was very disappointed to hear the comments of the chief of staff. we don't do this all the time,

okay? we don't use the power and prestige of america to beat on people for political purposes. i think of a lofty foreign policy of dean atchison and paul nitsy and henry kissinger where we're promoting u.s. interests, not the banal commercial interests of particular people. >> if the president of the united states was holding taxpayer money over the head of the president of ukraine, who is trying to fend his countries from a russian attack, and the president's using taxpayer money in order to get dirt on the bidens to help him in a political campaign that's coming up, would that to you be an impeachable offense? >> you know, i don't know. i don't know if it's impeachable or not, but it's certainly troublesome, and i think we need to get all the facts out there, and i would like to get some more advice about what is an impeachable offense, how this relates to what happened with clinton or it doesn't seem as much as nixon where he paid off

plumbers. that seems a lot worse, but it's troublesome. it's not a good thing, and you're on to something here that we should not be beating on a foreign country for political gain but should be for advancing united states strategic interests, which i think ambassador yovanovitch was doing. >> the president said today that republicans need to stick together, that at least democrats don't have someone like mitt romney. i'm wondering what you make of that. essentially, is -- shouldn't there be room for dissent and people of, you know, firm belief being able to voice their opinions? >> well, i think our country's built on speaking your mind and having freedom of expression. doesn't mean that there's anything there to impeach the president. it just means that we need to serve up all the different thoughts, comments, get everything on the table, and let people make their own decision. i thought that mitt romney's comments were very courageous and i think a lot of him.

i worked hard on his campaign. he's a close personal friend, wonderful american and family leader, and i appreciate what he did. >> you've just recently announced that you're not running for re-election. do you think it would be much harder for you to win given that you've been somewhat critical of the president? is there room for that sort of candidate in a republican primary anywhere? >> there would be some people that won't vote for me because of my more nuanced view of getting all the facts on impeachment and not just lock step saying no way, but at the end of the day, i'm not running again because i'm accomplished the things i've set out to do, and i never want to be considered a career politician. i'm a business person. i build up companies and create jobs for americans. >> congressman rooney, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thank you, anderson. just ahead, i'll talk with the former white house ethics lawyer about the promise president trump made before the inauguration to totally separate himself from his business and how that promise stacks up today.

i'm a lawyer now, but i had no idea that my grandfather was a federal judge in guatemala. my grandfather used his legal degree and his knowledge to help people that were voiceless in his country. that put a fire in my heart. it made me realize where i got my passion for social justice. bring your family history to life like never before. get started for free at ancestry.com you have power over pain, so the whole world looks different. the unbeatable strength of advil. what pain? to earn j.d. power chevdependability awards... across cars... trucks... and suvs. four years in a row. since more than 32,000 real people... just like me. and me. and me. took the survey that decided these awards. it was only right that you hear the good news from real people...

like us. i'm daniel. i'm casey. i'm julio. only chevy has earned j.d. power dependability awards across cars, trucks and suvs. four years in a row. some farms grow food. this one grows fuel. ♪ exxonmobil is growing algae for biofuels. that could one day power planes, propel ships, and fuel trucks...

and cut their greenhouse gas emissions in half. algae. its potential just keeps growing. ♪ its potential just keeps growing. so that early retirement we planned. it's going ok? great. now i'm spending more time with the kids. i'm introducing them to crab. crab!? they love it. so, you mentioned that that money we set aside. yeah. the kids and i want to build our own crab shack. ♪ ♪ ahhh, you're finally building that outdoor kitchen. yup - with room for the whole gang. ♪ ♪ see how investing with a j.p. morgan advisor can help you. visit your local chase branch.

. tonight we've talked about president trump, his retreat on hosting next year's g-7 at his florida golf resort and what he calls the phony emoluments clause in the u.s. constitution. before the inauguration he was adamant that his sons were running his business. he said in november 2016 the quote, i will be leaving my great business in total. he said he would never talk to his kids about it. he made a big show of that

claim. more than a month later said he'd turn over complete total control to his sons, never speak to them. today complete and total control sounded kind of like an afterthought. >> i own a property in florida. i was going to do it at no cost or give it free if i got a ruling, but i would have given it for nothing. it's a lot of money i would have given away, like i give away my salary. i was willing to do this for free, and it would have been the greatest g-7 ever, and i would have said to my family because they run my business now, i don't run my business. >> joined now by a former white house ethics lawyer, richard painter. he's been affiliated with the campaign legal center, left wing group that frequently criticizes the trump administration, he's involved in the pending emoluments lawsuit crew v trump. do you get the sense while the president may have reversed himself he doesn't seem to think he did anything wrong in the first place and said he thinks the emoluments clause is phony.

>> well, he says the emoluments clause is phony. he says judges are phony, if he disagrees with them or they happen to be mexican american judges. he says that democrats in the senate and the house are phony if they want to investigate him. he attacks the press, fake news media. he goes on and on, but the emoluments clause is real. it's in there for a reason. it's there to prevent any person holding a position of trust within the united states government from receiving profits and benefits from foreign governments, and he's been in violation of it since day one of his administration, and that's why we sued him. citizens for responsibility and ethics in washington, when i was the vice chair, the second circuit sided with us against president trump. other suits are going forward. he is just wrong about the emoluments clause. he has sought to use his presidency to enrich himself and

his family. he's getting emoluments and the trump tower istanbul, he's allowing the turkish army to slaughter or allies, our kurdish allies in syria. the list of conflicts of interest for this president goes on and on. it has tragic consequences. he needs to be impeached. >> when he says that, you know, he would have given his hotel at cost or for free, i mean, theoretically it's his kids who are running the hotel and making all the decisions, and he has no communication with his kids or his family about the hotel. i don't know how they have time to run a global business that is of the scale that the president claims it is when they're constantly tweeting and apparently watching television and doing speaking engagements and going on fox news, but the idea of him communicating with the kids, you would have to communicate with the kids in order to, i guess, you know, convince them to donate the hotel? >> well, yeah, the kids are his

bag men. they run all over the world and cut deals for the trump organization, but he still owns the trump organization. the kids just run it, and he has been very much involved in running the trump organization. look at what's happened here. he tried to set up a g-7 meeting at the trump golf resort, and that would have involved foreign governments making payments to the trump organization. maybe it was at cost, maybe not, but that doesn't matter under the emoluments clause. this was prohibited. he never should have suggested it. he has been using the presidency to enrich his own businesses. he still owns the businesses. he's profiting from that trump tower istanbul as the turkish army is invading syria. that is a fact. it's unconstitutional what he's doing, and this is on top of his using foreign powers to influence american elections. he's in violation of our constitution. this is not a left wing or right wing issue, this is an american

issue. he doesn't belong in the white house. >> he's also basically pitching this resort over and over and over again on a global scale, you know, mentioning the name of it, praising it. i mean, he's essentially doing infomercials for his property as he does for the myriad of properties that he visits and plays golf at and is photographing talks from on weekends. the president had a lot to say about george washington in this matter because i wasn't aware he was quite as big a student of history. i just want to play what he said. >> i give away my presidential salary. they say that no other president has done it. i'm surprised to be honest with you. they actually say that george washington may have been the only other president. george washington was actually considered a very, very rich man at the time. but they ran their businesses. george washington they say had two desks. he had a presidential desk and a business desk. >> what do you think george washington would have had to say

about all this? >> well, i think george washington would have been disgusted with donald trump and his behavior and his dealings with foreign countries, and george washington never dealt with foreign countries and foreign governments, did not violate the emoluments clause of the united states constitution. second, george washington, although he was a great president, that business he ran and the business thomas jefferson ran used slave labor. they did have an economic conflict of interest. it was a domestic con fliflict interest. it did not trigger the emoluments clause. it was very tragic, but for donald trump to acknowledge that part of george washington's history and thomas jefferson and refer to the plantations as wonderfully successful businesses, that shows his lack of understanding of american history, the role of slavery and also economic conflicts of interest and how tragic economic conflicts of interest, very, very rich powerful politicians

can be for our country. >> richard painter, good to have you on. thank you, sir. appreciate it. up next, cnn exclusive, did someone in the trump administration tip off a mining company that good news was coming its way over a controversial gold mine in alaska. allegations of insider trading are being leveled. we'll take a look. it begins by being privately owned. with more than 85 years of experience over multiple market cycles. with portfolio managers who are encouraged to do what's right over what's popular. focused on helping me achieve my investors' unique goals. can i find an investment firm that gets long term the way i do? with capital group, i can. talk to your advisor or consultant for investment risks and information.

♪ ♪ everything your trip needs, for everyone you love. expedia.

for everyone you love. i get it all the time. "have you lost weight?" of course i have- ever since i started renting from national. because national lets me lose the wait at the counter... ...and choose any car in the aisle. and i don't wait when i return, thanks to drop & go. at national, i can lose the wait...and keep it off. looking good, patrick. i know. (vo) go national. go like a pro. bleeding disorderste medlike hemophilia.s so victor can keep doing what's in his blood. at bayer, this is why we science.

a group of democratic senators tonight is urging several federal agencies to investigate what they call, quote, disturbing reports of suspicious trading, timed to president trump's comments on trade. 14 senators are calling on the department of justice, the fbi and securities and exchange commission and commodities futures trading commissions to look into reports that investors with ak is to nonpublic information may have made money off trade timed to the president's comments that moved market and some investors may have taken advantage of market

moving information potentially from government sources. and there are allegations also involving insider trading in alaska tonight. we first brought you information about the mine itself and its potential impact on spawning salmon grounds. drew griffin has the exclusive details of this latest development. an environmental group has filed an sec complaint asking for an investigation. it alleges that someone in the trump administration had tipped off the mining company that good news was coming their way. here's drew's report. >> reporter: the pebble mine is controversial because of its potential to pollute pristine rivers, creeks and lakes that feed into bristol bay, where 35 million wild sock eye salmon return to spawn every year. under president obama, the epa in 2014 put a special protection on the sensitive watershed, making it almost impossible for northern dynasty, the mine's

canadian parent company, to get a mining permit. under the trump administration, that all changed on june 26th, when the epa announced it was beginning the process to remove those special protections. the timing of that announcement was a surprise, even epa scientists were caught off guard. but something was happening days before the epa announcement that stormer securities regulator and financial securities lawyer joe groya seems to think is more fishing than just salmon. northern dynasty's stock volume began to move. from very small amounts, 100,000 shares a day or less, to very large amounts, 700,000 shares, over a million. someone looking at that is going to say what is causing that sudden interest in the company. >> 1.2 million shares were bought on june 20th by a company

insider and director of an offshore investor firm. the timing of stock purchases in advance of a major epa policy change is raising calls for an investigation. >> we believe what happened is that inside information was disclosed, insiders in the company traded on that information and then made a profit as a result of that. >> and that's illegal. >> yes, it is. >> lynn is an attorney working for the environmental group earth works, which just filed this complaint with the securities and exchange commission and new jersey's bureau of securities. at the heart of the complaint, did company insiders know in advance the epa was reversing course? >> so does that suggest that the inquiry that you are looking for would also include who at the epa may have tipped? >> absolutely. absolutely. that's key here. because government atemployeal are bound by the insider trading

rules as much as the of a person or person in the community. >> a stock tip web site during a concert that ron thiesen attended. the posts were removed shortly after the cnn started asking questions about them. a company spokesman says mr mr. thiesen did not tell investors in public or private conversation on june 19, 2019 or at any other time that he expected epa to imminently withdraw its veto. cnn obtained official notes with scientific research teams and groups opposed to the mines june 26 noting participants saying northern dynasty minerals and

the pebble limited partnership have been telling investors the epa would be announcing a decision soon that would be very favor favorle. >> i'm not suggestings the osc o are sec is investigating yet but there are ample grounds that canadian investors would hope this is a case that ought to be looked at by the securities commission. >> and if you were in charge of making that decision, you'd do it? >> i would. absolutely. >> the mining company has refused cnn's request for an interview, telling cnn the insinuations are you making are entirely false and without merit. >> the epa is already being sued by environmentalists over this mine, but this is completely different. this is allegations of a crime. what is the epa saying? >> we know a pebble mine, ti executive last year was very comfortable reaching out to the epa about the stock price of this mine. we know there were meetings in advance between the epa's top

decision-maker on this and the mining company, but the epa is insisting that there was no advanced notice on what they called the timing or content of this decision. they said that those meetings, including meetings with those opposed to the mine are quite common. the epa fighting back on this with us saying there was no tip. >> so where is this complaint going? the sec is not investigating at this point, right? >> el witwell, we don't know. this complaint was just filed. we talked to about a half a dozen former investigators, experts on this, they all say look, there's red flag there is. we won't know if the sec is investigating. even if they are investigating because that's pretty much priva private, but we'll find out if something goes up. >> more to come on tonight's breaking news, did vladimir putin pull more of the president's strings? right back with the report on the house intelligent committee member next. sure. sometimes i wish i had legs like you.

yeah, like a regular person. no. still half bike/half man, just the opposite. oh, so the legs on the bottom and motorcycle on the top? yeah. yeah, i could see that. for those who were born to ride, there's progressive.

woman: what does the word "partner" really mean? someone i can trust. (impact, click)

who is with me for the long-term. who understands i'm dealing with lives, not only livelihoods. that in order to help people, i need more than products, i need quality support and insights. can i find someone who partners with me to achieve people's long-term success? with capital group, i can. talk to your advisor or consultant for investment risks and information.