tell donald trump to go to hell. >> reporter: jeanne moos, cnn. >> this is kook land. >> reporter: new york. >> i'm sorry. i always love seeing that reaction of trump. okay. thank you so much for joining us. have a great night. "ac 360" with anderson starts right now. good evening. we start with some very surprising breaking election news. mike bloomberg, billionaire businessman and three-time new york city mayor is preparing to enter the democratic race. his spokesman said he is expected to file the necessary paperwork to get on the democratic primary ballot in alabama this week. bloomberg, of course, has considered running before. you may recall in march he talked about the, quote, difficulty of winning the democratic nomination in such a crowded field. here's what he told cnn's kate bolduan back in september. >> the truth of the matter is when you look at the layout of who's going to vote and where the country is, i would be very unlikely to get reelected -- to get elected, but in the private

sector, i can make a difference. >> well, in a statement, taking credit for some of tuesday's big wins for democrats, bloomberg adviser explains the reason for his decision to enter the race now, the current crop of democratic candidates. quote, we now need to finish the job and ensure that trump is defeated, but mike is increasingly concerned that the current field of candidates is not well positioned to do that. in a cnn poll of poll, biden leads the pack by 27%. closely behind is elizabeth warren, who has unsettled some on wall street with her wealth tax and more centrist democrats with her medicare for all plan. biden and warren are the only two above 20%. warren is also tied with biden in the latest iowa poll from monmouth university. joining me now, cnn political commentator paul beg gal lab, amanda carpenter, cnn political commentator and author of "gaslighting america." also kirsten powers and cnn political analyst and "new york times" national political correspondent alex burns, who

first broke the story. alex, mayor bloomberg has put in the past a lot of money into looking into this and really wanted to, but has decided not to previously. what's different now? >> you know, the biggest factor is what you just described in that statement is feeling like there is an opening the race that may not have been there six or eight months ago when he decided not to run. back in march he was looking at polling that showed joe biden was a very formidable front-runner, deep reservoir of good will with moderate democratic voters who would be the natural bloomberg constituency. the numbers bloomberg and his advisers are looking at now look less daunting in that department. a and the fact of the matter is he is not at a final, final decision according to people who have spoken with him directly, but the earliest filing deadline in the democratic race is tomorrow in alabama. if he doesn't file and become a candidate in the next 24 hours, that's one state where he cannot compete. so the idea is keep moving forward and put yourself in a position to compete when you really are ready to enter the race. >> do you know when he would

make that decision? >> the wait was characterized to me was more likely days than weeks, which leaves a lot of wiggle room. and one of the challenges, look, in reporting on michael bloomberg is because his resources are basically limitless, it costs him nothing to rev up for a presidential campaign, even if later he backs away from it. >> how much of this is kind of, you know, raising this up the flag pole and seeing in the next couple days how it kind of shifts things or people respond? >> oh, this is i think much more serious than just a trial balloon. he is making calls to party leaders today. he spoke to harry reid, the former senate majority leader from nevada on the phone this afternoon. and the way reid put it when i spoke to him is bloomberg didn't say he was running, but he wasn't calling just to wish me a good weekend. >> paul, what do you make of this? what kind of a candidate bloomberg -- what do you think he would do in this race? do you think he would actually win a primary and win the election? >> he certainly has the resource. and first, congratulations to alex for his reporting on this.

those moderate voters, though, that alex talked about who were for joe biden, they're essentially two groups of folks, african americans and working class whites. i literally don't know, but i have my suspicions about mayor bloomberg's ability to appeal to them. the path to the democratic nomination lies through african americans, especially black women, and i went back today and looked. since 1968, since they started having primaries in my party, the winner of the black vote has always been the nominee. and we keep obsessing on the white liberals twitter geeks and their fine. i love them. but the real heart of my party is people of collar and particularly women of color. and whoever can show me they can appeal to that community i think is the person who is going to be most likely to win. >> kirsten, among those lines, if you're looking at centrist democrats, you have joe biden, klobuchar, buttigieg currently in the race that would probably be the -- i mean, just in terms of the highest in the polls in

the centrist lane. >> right. i think that -- i don't see him as being disruptive to this race perhaps as some people do, because it's not like he comes in and gets coronated, right. he would have to be competing with these other people. pete buttigieg is really on the rise and is doing really well in iowa, for example. and so i think the idea that he is going to somehow come in, presumably he would be attacking warren, right, and what does that -- who does that help? you know, if he's trying to take, you know, trying to take out warren, what he is basically doing, let's assume he even -- he garners some of those votes. now what he is doing is dividing that moderate vote even more, right? so that actually helps warren. and furthermore, just because you're the person making the attacks doesn't mean that you're the person who -- even assuming the attacks are successful, which i don't think they probably would be, but if they were, it doesn't mean that you're the one that gets the

benefit. so he could come in and he could be going after warren and saying she is too extreme and medicare for all is going to bankrupt us, but there is no reason to believe that that's going to redound to his benefit. it could benefit biden. it could benefit amy klobuchar. it could benefit pete buttigieg. >> alex? >> i wouldn't assume that bloomberg necessarily gets into this race and immediately goes on the attack. that when he has prepared to run for president in the past, when he was gearing up to run as an independent in 2016, the campaign that they had staged for themselves was not about attacking hillary clinton or bernie sanders on the one hand and donald trump on the other. it was about running enormous volumes of positive advertising about he is an outsider. he is a problem solver, he is a businessman, this is what i did as mayor of new york. i think what kirsten is absolutely right about is his views are absolutely diametrically opposed to elizabeth warren and bernie sanders where the economy is concerned, and it would be a real challenge for him and a real opportunity for them given where the democratic party is to avoid getting into the kind of fight that would make him look

like this plutocrat who is trying to buy a presidency. >> amanda, it certainly, a, would seem that suddenly bloomberg views a weakness in vice president biden as a candidate, and also then, he -- yeah, this is clearly, i would think, he sees a weakness in the front-runner in the centrist lane, no? >> him getting into the race or even consider it shows there is a weakness or something lacking in the field. but listen, money is nice. money is great. it cannot buy you everything, especially two things that are incredibly important in this kind of race. the one is a tribe. we are in a time of hyper partisan politics, and you need people who are going to be on fire for you that will come to a rally, will knock on doors. and i don't know who the automatic swell of bloomberg voters would be at this moment in time. the second thing is it doesn't buy you media chops. i think help has a lot of knowledge, a lot of executive

experience. he knows the issues. he has been funding progressive groups for a long time on things like climate and gun violence, which are important, but is he a vessel for that message? i'm not going to believe he is viable until he starts getting out in the media and shows that he can go through a couple of tough interviews and gets roughed up and shows people he can withstand it. >> well, also, paul, the question of course can he also stand toe to toe on a debate stage with president trump. >> right. >> but even before that, can he stand on a debate stage with the other democratic candidates, and how does he fare in that? to alex's point, you can say you're going to run all the positive campaign commercials you want, but, you know, in the last debate, clearly the candidates have reached a point where they are starting to realize, all right, we actually have to now point out differences between us. >> i suspect what we saw in that clip with kate bolduan, i think the mayor is probably right when he predicted he couldn't get through the democratic process.

if he stands on the stage with donald trump, i think he matches up very well. he is actually a businessman. he is actually a billionaire. he is actually a philanthropist. he is all the things that trump pretends to be but is not. i think that works very well. he has to get through a democratic primary. amanda is right. he does have a great reservoir of goodwill for having funded climate and particularly on gun safety. i was in virginia for the big election. the folks from moms demand, from every town, these groups that have been working and many funded by bloomberg, they might really love him, but that's not going to be enough. we'll see. i'm all for more people running, particularly if they are billionaire and hire a lot of consultants like i used to be. but i just have a hard time seeing him being able to pull together. i will say joe biden started the race the day he announced at 28. you know where he is at? 28. we keep waiting for him to collapse. everybody presumes and i keep think thinking gee, he is going to fade.

it's been pretty impressive to me so far. >> kirsten, we're at a point in the race where these candidates have spent a lot of time in iowa, in new hampshire, in these early states. bloomberg obviously hasn't done that. i don't know if you can just go in and suddenly, you know, get voters. >> yeah, i mean, it's hard. it's hard at this stage. in the past, there have been people who have gotten in later and then wes clark was the big savior at one point. and of course he flamed out. so sometimes there is this sense that we're going to look for some new savior, and they're going to come in and everybody gets excited, and then they kind of flame out. but i think to paul's point is we very often underestimate the level of affection there is among democratic voters for joe biden. this is a long relationship that he has had with them. he has a lot of good will with them that mike bloomberg, whatever his -- whatever good things you can say about him, he just doesn't have. that's not -- he just -- very few people have it, and very few people have been in politics as

long as joe biden, and joe biden has i think this authenticity that people relate to, and he has this empathy that comes born of tragedy. so he has forged a real relationship that i think is hard. the idea that you're just going to come in and take those voters. i don't think it's that easy. >> yeah, relationships matter. paul begala, thank you, kirsten powers, amanda burns. thank you very much. up next, keeping them honest in the ukraine controversy. what state department official said, and how he could spell trouble for the white house and rudy giuliani when public hearings begin next week, because he is going to lead them off. also, breaking news you'll hear only on this program. a formal response to the white house from an attorney representing the original whistle-blower in the ukrain matter. the physical danger he says his client is now in because of president trump, when we continue. when you look at the world,

what do you see? we see patterns. relationships. when you use location technology, you can see where things happen, before they happen. with esri location technology, you can see what others can't. ♪ t-mobile's newest most powerful signal is here. experience it with the amazing, new iphone 11. and right now, t-mobile has the best deal on iphone. get 4 lines of unlimited with 4 iphone 11 included for only $35 a line. if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, every day can begin with flakes. it's a reminder of your struggles with psoriasis. but what if your psoriasis symptoms didn't follow you around? that's why there's ilumya.

with just 2 doses, a majority of people were clear or almost clear. and over time, even more people were clear or almost clear. all with dosing 4 times a year... after 2 initial doses. plus, ilumya was shown to have similar risks of infections compared to placebo. don't use if you are allergic to ilumya or any of its ingredients. before starting treatment, your doctor should check for tuberculosis and infections. after checking there is no need for routine lab monitoring unless your doctor advises it. ilumya may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or have symptoms, or if you plan to or have recently received a vaccine. this could be your chance to leave your psoriasis symptoms behind. ask your doctor for ilumya today, for a clearer tomorrow. of millions of americans during the recession. so, my wife kat and i took action. we started a non-profit community bank with a simple theory - give people a fair deal and real economic power. invest in the community,

in businesses owned by women and people of color, in affordable housing. the difference between words and actions matters. that's a lesson politicians in washington could use right now. i'm tom steyer, and i approve this message.

[ soft piano music playing ] mm, uh, what do you do for fun? -not this. ♪ -oh, what am i into? mostly progressive's name your price tool. helps people find coverage options based on their budget. flo has it, i want it, it's a whole thing, and she's right there. -yeah, she's my ride. this date's lame. he has pics of you on his phone. -they're very tasteful. man: how can i deliver superior long-term results? it begins with a distinctive approach to managing money. that for over 85 years has focused on keeping confidence up when markets are down. an approach where portfolio managers work well independently. and even better together. who don't just invest, but are personally invested. can i find a proven approach designed to deliver results? with capital group, i can. talk to your advisor or consultant for investment risks and information.

hours ago, we received a preview of what the first day of public hearings in the house impeachment inquiry holds for the president, and a damning day it may be for him. the closed door especially the of a top diplomat named george kent, and it confirms much of the testimony that we reported this week, namely, that according to kent, the ukrainians weren't going to get their security money unless they committed to an investigation of the bidens, a quid pro quo, which is one way to call it. others call it a shakedown, an extortion attempt, bribery. those are other names. kent called it a, quote, campaign of lie, end quote. kent is the deputy assistant secretary of state for european and euasian affairs. he also spelled out how his own state department was left to twist in the wind as a campaign of mud, slander and hooey. kent also said this during testimony, quote, potus wanted nothing less than president zelensky to go to the microphone

and say investigation biden, and clinton. clinton he says was shorthand for the 2016 election, and kent, as we mentioned earlier says he does believe there may have been a quid pro quo on the basis of ukraine obtaining a, quote, meeting with the white house. in other words, announce investigations and you get your face-to-face with president trump. he said he had concerns about, quote, an effort to initiate politically motivated prosecutions that were injurious to the rule of law. he also said the ukrainians understood mr. giuliani asserted he represented mr. trump in his private capacity, a fact that giuliani confirmed in a tweet last night. quote, the investigation i conducted concerning 2016 ukrainian collusion and corruption was done solely as a defense attorney to defend my client against false charges that kept changing as one after another were disproven. that tweet, though, it didn't really clear this up. in fact, kind of the opposite. people quickly point out how it contradicts what his client, the president had been saying. legal scholar laurence tribe

tweeted, quote, this is nothing less than a confession that president trump was shaking down ukraine president zelensky not for the nation's benefit, but for the political benefit of donald j. trump as rudy's private client. we'll talk with professor tribe about that when he joins me a bit later on. back to george kent, he is going to answer questions again in the first day of public testimony next week. here to discuss, cnn senior political reporter nia-malika henderson, carl bernstein, plus chief cnn legal analyst and author jeffrey toobin. once again, jeff, rudy giuliani at the center of this, and in one tweet, essentially exposes his client. >> and the question has always been what was he doing and who was he doing it for? now his view is in the tweet that well, it was all just work as a defense attorney. so if that's the case, why is he making american foreign policy over there? why is he deciding whether, you

know, this aid goes through or not, whether the president of the united states meets with the president of ukraine? every witness that has come forward so far has said that those were the real objectives of american foreign policy. >> and the president multiple times said oh, go talk to rudy for the details on this. he even said that to zelensky, talk to rudy. >> talk to rudy. and rudy, according to rudy, was just a defense lawyer, not an american government official. >> carl, the president, quote, wanted nothing less than zelensky to go to microphone and basically say investigations biden and clinton. that's what george kent testified to. that's pretty clear. >> it's not only clear, what this is about is a conspiracy driven by the president of the united states with his lawyer to undermine the american electoral system through the intervention of a foreign power in our

elections. it is the definition of a high crime. this is -- it's exactly the same thing that nixon was impeached for and was one of the articles of impeachment, trying to undermine the electoral process through sabotage and political espionage. we've got it all over again, except in this incidence, it my mai be a lot worse because of the interest of a foreign power. >> nia, the thing is kent wasn't directly in discussions with the president about this, which is what republicans will point to, especially next week when he is testifying on camera. he also didn't know whether the investigation was tied to military aid. so is that in and of itself a win for the white house? >> i think so in many ways. as you said, republicans have been hammering this point not only with this witness who will come forward next week, but also with bill taylor. the idea that this is all third and fourth hand information in some ways and that they never talked to the president, and you heard the president and other of his advisers essentially say they don't even really know who these people are.

but, again, i think the time we talked about giuliani, right? he is the tie to all of this, right. people are obviously engaging with giuliani at various times and the president obviously telling people that giuliani is the point person. so this idea that they can sort of insulate giuliani from the president, that giuliani isn't directly representing what the president wants in this -- some call it scheme, quid pro quo, in terms of the holdup of the money and the deliverable from zelensky and the ukraines. it's very hard to separate the president from this given what giuliani has said and given that the president over and over again says talk to rudy, talk to rudy. he is the point guy on this. >> you know, there is this very interesting parallel between what went on with the money to stormy daniels and karen mcdougal before the end of the campaign. michael cohen was the executer of that -- the delivery of that money, and the president or the

candidate was insulated. and at least for a time could say, well, michael cohen was doing just what he is doing. here it's giuliani as the cut-out. the stakes are of course a great deal higher because we're talking about american foreign policy. >> this is a model that he has used before. >> that's right. >> yes. >> and we have the conversation itself in which the president of the united states makes the connection and makes it clear that he is driving the conspiracy. >> jeff, just on a legal front, i mean, john bolton didn't show up for testimony today. democrats are saying they're not going to subpoena him because they don't want a court battle to slow down their inquiry. does that make sense? bolton seems essential -- we don't know what he would say, but if there was a time when the president talked to bolton about this, that would be directly from the president. >> it's a trade-off. i certainly think bolton is the key, key witness here and could blow the case wide open, even to the point of getting perhaps

republicans to turn on the president. but the calendar is what nancy pelosi wants. she has committed to get this -- not just through the intelligence committee, not just through the judiciary committee, but through the house of representatives, impeachment done by the end of the year. even if that slips to january, let's say, there is absolutely no way a district court plus the circuit court of appeals, to say nothing of the supreme court could get a resolution with bolton done by that point. so they're just going to give up on him. >> we're going take a quick break. more ahead. nia-malika henderson, jeff toobin is going to stay with us. more breaking news ahead. a "ac 360" exclusie. a letter sent to ukraine for the whistle-blower to the white house. we'll tell you what it said and the implications next.

before nexium 24hr mark could only imagine... a peaceful night sleep without frequent heartburn waking him up. now that dream is a reality. nexium 24hr stops acid before it starts for all-day, all-night protection. can you imagine 24 hours without heartburn? i have moderate to severe pnow, there's skyrizi. ♪ things are getting clearer, yeah i feel free ♪ ♪ to bare my skin ♪ yeah that's all me. ♪ nothing and me go hand in hand ♪ ♪ nothing on my skin ♪ that's my new plan. ♪ nothing is everything. keep your skin clearer with skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. of those, nearly 9 out of 10 sustained it through 1 year. and skyrizi is 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. ♪ i see nothing in a different way ♪ ♪ and it's my moment so i just gotta say ♪ ♪ nothing is everything skyrizi may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. before treatment your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis.

tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms such as fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or coughs, or if you plan to or recently received a vaccine. ♪ nothing is everything ask your dermatologist about skyrizi. ♪ driven each day to pursue bioplife-changing cures...ers. in a country built on fostering innovation. here, they find breakthroughs... like a way to fight cancer by arming a patient's own t-cells... and a new therapy that gives the blind a working gene so they can see again. because it's not just about the next breakthrough...

it's all the ones after that. rowithout the commission fees and account minimums. so, you can start investing today, wherever you are even on the bus. ooh, like this guy. yeah, i bet he's investing right now. he's taking charge. he's grabbing the bull by the horns! and he - just missed his stop, yeah. it's time to do money, so what are you waiting for. download now and get your first stock on us. robinhood.

that could allow hackers devices into your home.ys and like all doors, they're safer when locked. that's why you need xfinity xfi. with the xfi gateway, devices connected to your homes wifi are protected. which helps keep people outside from accessing your passwords, credit cards and cameras. and people inside from accidentally visiting sites that aren't secure. and if someone trys we'll let you know. xfi advanced security. if it's connected, it's protected. call, click, or visit a store today.

a "360" exclusive now. there is no question that the whistle-blower on ukraine has enraged president trump. he has unleashed a twitter storm of protest. here are just some of his comments. >> and you have to see who the whistle-blower is. >> and you haven't heard about the whistle-blower after that, have you? because the whistle-blower said lots of things that weren't so good, folks. you're going to find out. >> i think that the whistle-blower gave a lot of false information. >> tonight, a stark formal response to the white house from the whistle-blower's attorney that you'll only see here in the letter obtained exclusively by "360." the whistle-blower's attorney tells the white house counsel in part that, quote, the president of the united states is engaging in rhetoric and activity that places my client, intelligence community whistle-blower and their family in physical danger.

i'm writing to respectfully request that you counsel your client on the legal and ethical peril in which he is placing himself should anyone be physically harmed as a result of his or his surrogate's behavior. the whistle-blower's attorney adds, quote, his calls to the public to identify my client by name and his suggestion that he would support acts of violence against my client are candidly some of the most dangerous and reckless things a president of the united states can say. he continues, "let me be clear. should any harm befall any named whistle-blower or his family, the blame will rest squarely with your client. i submit that it is in your client's best interests to cease and desist in calling for the public disclosure of my client's identity and to cease in rhetoric that may endanger their lived and the lives of their family. should anyone be harmed, my co-counsel mark zaid and i will not he's to take any action and

all appropriate action against your client. those who are complicit in this vindictive chasm pain against my client, whether through action or inaction shall also be responsible." what do you think? >> it's chilling. the level of intensity against the whistle-blower, starting with the president is just a scary business, and we have seen what it's like in the political atmosphere in which we live. there is violence. there are people who take the president and go even further. and i think it's a risk to this person. i mean the irony, of course, is a, everything the whistle-blower has said has checked out to be true. and b, he never claimed to have firsthand information. he merely suggested that the inspector general go talk to these other people, which they did. so there is really no need for him to form forward. >> nia, it seems to me at this point the whistle-blower is clearly like a red herring here.

it's clearly he is directing people toward the whistle-blower with the idea that this is some sort of a democratic plot and this is a deep state actor or whatever it may be, when in fact at this point the whistle-blower doesn't even matter who it is or anything about the whistle-blower because the information is out there and it has a life of its own. it's either true or not true. >> that's right. and the information is out there because, you know, nearly a dozen or over a dozen folks, state department officials as well as folks who worked in the white house, people who worked with vice president pence, for instance, have come forward to largely corroborate what was in this whistle-blower's account. they want to direct anger towards this whistle-blower, and you see, listen, republicans in some way are sort of in the conservative press rattling behind his efforts, and then people like senator rand paul also calling on the press, which isn't going to happen, to name the whistle-blower. and so and jim jordan, for instance, saying they want to subpoena the whistle-blower. so i do think this is a

distraction by the president. i think he likes a target, and it's easier for him to have a single target rather than a 15 or so targets, all of the people who have come forward with impeccable credentials. and he i think is trying to set up this boogieman in the whistle-blower and the folks who are supporting him in some ways are trying to do the same thing. donald trump jr. i think also sort of tweeted something trying to out the whistle-blower. and listen, i think this letter was really important. it's sobering. the stakes are high for this person, and it's a dangerous time for this president to try to out whoever this person is. >> carl? >> trump is always trying to make the conduct of other people the issue instead of the conduct of himself. it's the press. it's hillary. now it's the whistle-blower. the whistle-blower has performed a great service because what we have seen is his information confirmed that indeed the president of the united states has engaged in all likelihood in bribery. the constitution only mentions two specific high crimes,

bribery and treason. this is a case of bribery. the whistle-blower called the nation's attention to the president's extortionate demands and bribery, and there is a real chance the evidence has the president boxed. in that's why he is flailing once again, contemptuous of everything and everybody around him, except he is unwilling to look at his own conduct. >> it is illegal to unmask -- i mean, the calls to -- >> it's actually illegal for the inspector general, the person who received the whistle-blower complaint to disclose. it's not technically illegal for the president. he shouldn't find out who it is in the first place, but the only actual legal prohibition is on the recipient. >> for the employer to go after a whistle-blower. >> to retaliate, it is. >> and he's talking about retaliation. >> well, he is talking about it by implication. it's a very sinister environment. he hasn't specifically said --

called for violence, but the implication is clearly there. >> all right, jeff toobin, carl bernstein, nia-malika henderson, thanks very much. still more ahead, does a single tweet from rudy giuliani put him squarely in the middle of the impeachment inquiry? coming up we'll talk with harvard law school professor laurence tribe. ink of verizon as a reliable phone company. (woman) but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. ♪

so why haven't you started building? tyler's off to college. and mom's getting older. mhm, and eventually we would like to retire. td ameritrade can help you build a plan for today and tomorrow. come with a goal. leave with a plan. td ameritrade.

more now on that one tweet by president trump's personal

attorney that may become one of the focal points of the impeachment inquiry. the tweet, where rudy giuliani says he acted in the ukraine affair as the president's attorney to defend him against, quote, false charges. harvard university's professor laurence tribe is joining me now for the latest on his opinion of what giuliani's tweet spells trouble -- how it spells trouble for the president. tweeted out saying this is nothing less than the president was shaking down president zelensky not for the nation's benefit, but for the political benefit of donald j. trump as rudy's private client. laurence tribe is the author of "the power of impeachment." he joins me tonight. you said giuliani's tweet is nothing less than a confession the president was, in your words, shaking down the ukrainian president, not for the benefit of the u.s., but for his own personal benefit. can you explain what you mean by that? >> basically, rudy giuliani has

said proudly that he is representing not the united states of america but donald j. trump, his private client. well, rudy giuliani, who appears something like 430 times in these transcripts was representing this private client in dealings with a foreign sovereign, trying to shake them down in a way that would benefit his private client's political interests. that is an abuse of power of the first order. it's exactly the reason that alexander hamilton and james madison designed an impeachment power. >> yeah, it's incredible that he suddenly is sort of not appeared on television, which is probably wise listening to counsel, but with that one tweet he would very proudly tweet that out and yet it does tremendous damage. i guess he was being honest, but

it nevertheless does damage to him and to his client, the president. >> that's right. it's one of these typical washington gaffes where you accidentally tell the truth, and it's a truth that really hurts this president. i don't want to seem gleeful about it. the fact is the united states of america is in real danger. we've got a president who is willing to compromise our national security by hurting a country that is a buffer zone between an expanding russia and the nato alliance by undermining the ukraine, claiming it's a phony country, and basically, hollowing out the state department to achieve that purpose. >> cnn is reporting that the impeachment investigation in the house could be wrapped up by christmas. clearly, that does not allow for court battles to try to get giuliani or other people who are refusing subpoenas to testify.

is that a realistic timeline? and do you think that just from a legal standpoint, does that hurt the case if you don't have the testimony of a giuliani, of a rick perry, who seemed to have been involved in this deeply as well? >> well, you know, honestly, i think giuliani and perry are not terribly worth listening to, and i think that adam schiff has made a very sound decision in not letting courts just drag things out. when judge richard leon, who is a little bit of a loose cannon said that it would take him at least until december 10th before he could even hear the bizarre argument by charles kupperman who is john bolton's deputy, that he needs advice about whether to comply with the lawful subpoena or instead to simply clam up because the white house told him to, when you've got that kind of protracted

litigation and prospect, there is just no reason to tolerate it. and that's why i think yanking that subpoena and saying it's going to be enough to see what judge jackson rules about the former white house counsel makes a lot of sense. i think the house of representatives is done allowing this president simply to stall and drag everything out. there is more than enough evidence now to conclude that this president has committed what the framers would have regarded as grave high crimes and misdemeanors, including one that is named in the constitution, namely, bribery. the president was soliciting a bribe from president zelensky when he said if you go on cnn with fareed zakaria and tell everybody you're investigating hunter biden, then i will regard it as appropriate for me to release these defense funds. i mean, that's a bribe. it's extortion. it's clearly an abuse of power.

it's a betrayal of trust. it's a high crime and misdemeanor, and it's about time that we brought this all to an end. >> just lastly, the president tweeted this morning, quote, it was just explained to me that for next week's fake hearing trial in the house as they interview never trumpers and others, i get no lawyer and no due process. obviously, the whole never trumper thing, that's just made up. there is no evidence of the political positions of the people who are testifying, and there is no indication as we know, the president believes never trumpers are -- he kuwaits them with in his words human scum. i'm wondering what your reaction is to that tweet. >> well, it's hard to know where to start. obvious that the president is abysmally ignorant. it's not a trial in the house. it's really a decision about whether to have a trial in the senate. frankly, if he wants to have the house conduct a trial and render a verdict of guilt without going

to the senate, i think a lot of people would welcome that because the house of representatives would have no trouble finding him guilty. it's in the senate where he's got a lot of people in his hip pocket. >> professor laurence tribe, i appreciate you being on. thank you. >> thanks, anderson. >> still ahead tonight, the president once said "i won't settle this case," but settle it he did over claims he used his own foundation as a piggy bank to help his personal business and political interests. the judge's ruling lands on "the ridiculist," when we continue. because allergies... shouldn't get in the way of a good time. because a heart attack... should never stop the heart of a family. because hemophilia... shouldn't keep someone from doing what's in their blood. at bayer, everything we do... from advances in health to innovations in agriculture... is to help every life we touch. at bayer, this is why we science.

busy night, as always. let's check in with chris, see what he is working on. chris? >> this is a big deal tonight, with bloomberg. we don't know that he's getting in, but we know he is making preparations after he had all this money and time and expertise spent to come to the conclusion that he couldn't win. >> yeah. >> what changed? i will argue tonight that this is the reverberation of what you and i have been hearing from democrats all across the country. they're not sure they have a dragon slayer in their field. they saw those state-by-state polls that prove an obvious point. don't look at the national

polls, look state by state where you have to win, and that president is formidable. >> we'll be watching it. chris, 12 minutes from now. see you then. coming up, another big day in president trump's philanthropy world. a judge weighs in on the trump foundation, which is already defunct. "the ridiculist" is next.

if you have moderate to thsevere rheumatoid arthritis, month after month, the clock is ticking on irreversible joint damage. ongoing pain and stiffness are signs of joint erosion. humira can help stop the clock. prescribed for 15 years, humira targets and blocks a source of inflammation that contributes to joint pain and irreversible damage. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common,

and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. help stop the clock on further irreversible joint damage. talk to your rheumatologist. right here. right now. humira. time now for the ridiculous, and if you like your shady charities like you like your bogus universities you will love the latest milestone of the defunct trump foundation. trump ordered to pay $2 million in trump foundation settlement admits misuse of funds. i think someone at fox is going to get fired for that headline because it's actually accurate. a new york superior court judge has ordered the president to pay $2 million to various charities as part of a settlement in a civil lawsuit by the new york state attorney general's office. president trump admits to using the charitable foundation to

funnel money to his 2016 presidential campaign which is not only illegal but really sleazy. the lawsuit was against president trump as well as ivanka, eric and don jr. and the judge found president trump breached his duty to the foundation by using it to aid his political and business interests. what does fiduciary mean, you might ask? the first entry in miriam webster's dictionary is, quote, held or founded in trust or confidence. all right. so the president of the united states can't be trusted. can't have confidence in him. boohoo. grow up, america. it's like mulvaney says, get over it. trust and confidence, so boring. it's like being presidential. who would show up for the rallies? we want circuses, schemes, tough talk like when trump says he never settles lawsuits. remember that? oh, we have a montage. >> this is a case i could have settled very easily but i don't settle cases very easily when i'm right.

i would win the case in the end. i didn't want to be forced to settle and i could settle that case. i could have sit ld ettled it. i don't settle cases. would have been much easier if i settled. it would have probably been cheaper. i don't care. when i ran they said why didn't you settle up the case. probably should have settled it. mentally i can't do it. i'd rather spend more money and fight. >> even tweeted about this lawsuit saying i won't settle the case and put an exclamation mark on it. that's when you know he really means it. if you had trust and confidence, however,that statement consider yourself defrauded as well because he settled the case just like he did with the shenanigans over trump university and does quite frequently and gets sued quite frequently. as part of the settlement the trump kids who were officers of the foundation, they have to undergo training so that they won't do the sleazy stuff again with some other foundation they

might set up. are there training classes for how to run a foundation without misusing funds or is that like a tutor who has to come to your office? i mean, that's got to hurt. look, i sympathize. i took a driver's ed training class when i was a kid, and it was long and it was boring. but, you know, these are three people who are allegedly running businesses. shouldn't they know this kind of stuff already? and the president has agreed that should he ever form another charity in new york he has to file reports with the attorney general's office for five years and, quote, maintain a working familiarity with the applicable new york rules and laws. that's a good idea. maintain a working familiarity. not a really deep familiarity. just a working one. for the full story of the scams i recommend you read coverage of the past few years from "the washington post" who was awarded the pugh litzer prize for his reporting which kicked into gear after this 2016 fund-raiser for

veterans charities. >> donald trump, another great builder in new york, now a politician. a politician? i don't want to be called a politician. all talk, no action. i refuse to be called a politician. donald trump gave $1 million. okay? >> by the way, when does one reach a level of fame and/or ego or vanity that it seems reasonable to refer to yourself constantly in the third person? anderson cooper wants to know. anyway, there was never actually any proof that trump made the donation or that any of the other money he claimed he raised made it to the charity until "the washington post" started asking questions and, oh, yeah, the money was for some reason routed through the foundation which according to the court was run at that point by his campaign. now aside from helping his presidential bid, the trump foundation's priorities have also included paying legal fees for the president's for profit businesses, spending thousands of dollars on sports memorabilia as well as undisclosed $25,000

political donations to pam bondy who is one of the president's impeachment advisers, oddly enough, and because there's no such thing as too shady in trump world the foundation bought at least two giant portraits of mr. trump. this is a gorgeous portrait this one cost his charity $10,000 and hung at his doral golf course, the same place he wanted to strand world leaders during next june's g7 summit. you can see why the judge hit him with a $2 million fine. he tweeted about the settlement saying he is happy to donate $2 million to charity. is it a donation if it's court ordered? i don't think so. i'll have to look that up. let's wait a few months and ask after they've completed their court ordered training sessions. trump foundation may be closed but its legacy lives on in perpetuity on the ridiculist. our digital show gives us a

chance to dig into important topics. we focused on the newly identified strain of hiv which sounds scary when you hear the headline. the good news is it's not as scary. it's only been found in three samples so is rare, only found in central africa and current hiv tests can detect it and available medication against it. it is a reminder to be tested for hiv regularly. i spoke on full circle with mary rogers who helped make this latest discovery, the principle scientist of infectious disease research at abbott. >> all of these strains are really a plane ride away in our connected world that we live in. we can't think of them in isolation. we have to think of ourselves as potentially being exposed to any different strain of hiv and why we're looking everywhere not just in africa, in asia, in other continents. we're looking everywhere. >> a really interesting conversation, you can watch the whole thing at

cnn.com/fullcircle and watch live weekdays at 5:00 p.m. eastern. let's hand it over to chris for "cuomo prime time." welcome to "prime time." former new york city mayor and billionaire michael bloomberg taking steps to enter the race. is this playing like a distress call? it certainly has to be a gut check. is this the suggestion that the democratic field is too weak? is bloomberg saying out loud what many wonder about? we're going to show you why bloomberg thinks he can get in, what it could mean for the race as we hear from another democrat who's definitely on the rise, pete buttigieg. he says i'm the man for the job and the fight. what do you say? let's get after it. look, impeachment matters. it's somewhat of an x