>> reporter: this is actually the third time that president trump has won lie of the year, which means at least he wasn't lying when he said this. >> it's too much winning. we can't take it anymore. >> reporter: jeanne moos, cnn. >> i consider it to be a fake whistle-blower. >> that's not a whistle. that's an air horn. >> reporter: new york. >> too much winning. anderson starts now. thanks for joining us. we are on the cusp of history. tomorrow the president of the united states is likely to be impeached. the house rules committee is arguing to decide the terms and debate before a final vote. the senate also arguing about whether to allow witnesses. today president trump released a letter on white house stationery written to nancy pelosi. the president says he's writing it for history to express his, quote, strongest and most powerful protest against the impeachment effort in the house. it's certainly not the kind of letter anyone might think a

president would write or sending. some might kindly describe it as fiery, others would call it at times unhinged. he describes speaker pelosi and the democrats as deranged and spiteful, saying, quote, no intelligent person believes what you are saying. you are declaring open war on american democracy. the president of the united states writing that not to an invading army or enemy who has hit us with an unprovoked attack, telling elected officials that people's representatives are declaring war on democracy. the president who's not known as a student of history writes more due process was accorded to those in the salem witch trails. he says at the ending of the mueller investigation you did not apologize, you did not recant, you did not ask to be forgiven, you showed no remorse or capacity for self-reflection. the president who never apologizes, never recants, dismayed that nancy pelosi has not done so with him. one of the more curious phrases in the letter does sound like president trump. you've cheapened the importance

of the very ugly word "impeachment." which begs the question how does one cheapen the importance of a very ugly word. the president said this letter is written for the purposes of history. more likely it's to capture today's news cycle before tomorrow's impeachment vote. history remembers many words from our president. this is likely not to be some of them. the gettysburg address was memorable. today the president was asked if he takes any responsibility for the impeachment. this is what he said. >> do you take any responsibility for the fact that you're about to be impeached? >> no. i don't take any. zero, to put it mildly. >> zero responsibility. he was also asked back in january if the buck stopped with him and he replied the buck stops with everybody. keeping them honest, there are a few things the president left out of his letter. namely his pursuit of a fictional election interference claim about a server in ukraine, his pursuit of a favor from ukraine's president, a favor that would target his main opponent and help him in the

next election, his withholding from ukraine of aid and to this date still a white house meeting. the lack of evidence that president trump was concerned about corruption in ukraine involving anyone whose last name wasn't biden. comments to the press about wanting ukraine to investigate biden. comments about wanting china to investigate as well and so on. he also does not mention the key role his tv attorney and bagman rudy giuliani has played, which is curious as guiliani has been quite vocal over the past 24 hours. in a range sbrf viinterviews, hn saying how he started down this road. he told cnn that he and the president are on the same page and mike pompeo was aware of the push to oust the ukrainian ambassador. the reason he wanted to do this because she had been blocking witnesses to come to the united states and she had been doing it for a year. he told the "new yorker" he needed her out of the way, unquote, because she was making the investigations difficult. which means on the eve of the

president's impeachment, guiliani is admitting the very thing the president and his supporters in congress have spent the past two months saying didn't happen. investigate joe biden not on behalf of the united states as he and his supporters have been trying to spin but on behalf of his personal client, donald trump. as we said, speaker pelosi responded to his letter just a short time ago. here's what she told manu raju. >> your reaction to the president's reaction? >> no reaction. it's ridiculous. >> you have no reaction? why not? >> i haven't fully read it. we've been working. i've seen the essence of it, though, and it's really sick. >> jim acosta joins us now. jim, the letter -- talk to me about it. when was it written, how was it written? was it lawyers and the president or what? >> reporter: well, we understand, anderson, this was written over the last several days. this was not something that's been in the works for weeks or anything of that nature. we understand that stephen miller, one of the president's top speech writers, as well as other top aides in the west wing were helping the president draft

this speech. we did pick up on some consternation inside the west wing earlier this evening. there are some officials who feel as though they were left out of the process of writing this letter. but i will tell you, anderson, talking to a couple of officials within the last hour, the white house counsel's office did have some input into this letter according to these officials. but these officials were saying, anderson, listen, these are the president's own words. you can have stephen miller write some of these lines down and so on, but if you go through this letter to nancy pelosi, five or six pages long, it is essentially a estimatisummatione the president has been the last several months when it comes to impeachment. according to one official i spoke with earlier this evening, if you want to know and understand the president's state of mindi tonight, read that letter. >> is it known what the president is going to do tomorrow? is he going to be watching this as many people will be? what's on his schedule? >> reporter: yeah, i was in the oval office with him earlier today and he said he's not going

to be watching these proceedings, he's going to be working on other things over here at the white house. we understand the president is not going to give some sort of formal speech in response to his impeachment in the house tomorrow. that at least is the planning at this point. he is going to have a rally tomorrow evening in michigan where he expect him perhaps to expand upon where he's at right now in this letter. but, anderson, what we were picking up on in the oval office, and obviously what's written across all of these pages of this letter, is that this is a president, and he told me this earlier this afternoon, who is taking zero responsibility for the historic predicament that he finds himself in tonight. i expect him to have that tone moving forward, anderson. >> jim acosta, thanks very much. i want to bring in our legal team for their thoughts. david gergen, the president's letter, does it make sense? is it just to capture, you know, the news cycle on this day that this is what's the head line going into the impeachment?

>> that's not what he said. he said it's his bid for history. i think right now it's going to go down as a letter from a two-bit dictator in a banana republic. it has that kind of quality to it. but think about our history and the people we've had who have penned letters who have been in that office. think about the gettysburg address. think about donald trump's letter and going up against jefferson and up against lincoln on the second inaugural or gettysburg, franklin roosevelt and the fireside chats, jack kennedy and his inaugural, ronald reagan. this is going to be in those annals as a representation of this president for a man who apparently we were told by his close folks that he cares mostly about his legacy these days? this is what he's contributing to his legacy? >> yeah, it is extraordinary, jeff, when you think lincoln gives the gettysburg address and talks about the civil war, which

is -- you know, which would lead to the deaths of countless americans. there's not language like that in that. >> but this is -- it's perfect. this is exactly who he is. i mean this is not -- you know, if you saw president trump give something that sounded like the gettysburg address, would you believe it at all? we know this man by now, and this narcissism, this lying, this self obsession, this ignorance of history, this is all what's here. and you know what? he got elected president of the united states behaving exactly this way, and he may get re-elected behaving exactly this way. but there's no mystery about who he is. this is who he is. >> this is like the longest tweet in american history. it's a tweet. it's just extended, shall we say. and it shows you that this is a president who has no self-control whatsoever. i am sure there were people who said, maybe just a couple, are

you sure you want to do this? or are you sure you want to say this? maybe a couple egged him on. >> do you think there's somebody that actually said that still? >> hope springs eternal. >> you can tell the paragraphs that the lawyers put in actually because it's cut and paste. you can really see that. but if i were a senator now and i were thinking, okay, i've got to now judge this man's fitness for office and this thing landed like a grenade today, i'd be raising a lot of questions about that. >> mike? is this something that you would want to represent the president? >> well, a few things. first of all, we talked before. the president is his own chief of staff, his own communications director. and so he did not get to where he is by not standing up and fighting for himself his entire life. and so he's not -- he'll be damned if the night before he's going to be impeached in a political impeachment, not stand up for himself and say what he thinks and what he wants to do. so you're right, he did write this.

i'm sure his lawyers added some things in because it's about impeachment, and this is him. from a historical perspective, he represents this time. he got elected by 63 million americans who were angry and upset about people in d.c. and in new york and other places who don't like a guy like him. what the democrats are doing this week is really -- it's amazing how personal they make this and how much it's clear they don't like him, which is why impeachment is turning against them. yeah, he's being himself. his voters and supporters are rallying behind him. that's the guy they want to see standing up. they love it. >> i actually think -- i do agree with mike that this is who he is. while it's alarming, it's not particularly surprising. i wouldn't expect democrats to make the letter be the thing that they are going to run against this week. i actually think what senator schumer was doing today, which is making this about preventing witnesses from coming, not providing documents, holding republicans accountable for not asking for that. i mean part of the -- one of the

articles is about obstructing congress and you have republicans in congress who don't seem bothered by that. >> do you really think so? i don't know if that -- that strikes me as the democrats playing the republicans process game. it's whether this is a fair trial or not. how about going to a foreign leader and saying give me dirt on my political opponent. >> of course that's what it's about. but do i think what leader schumer is also seeing is that in the abc poll, 70% of the public, more than 60% of republicans think that witnesses should come and testify and he wants republicans who are vulnerable to be held accountable for that so i don't think they'll push the letter as speaker pelosi just did. she said this is crazy, this is ridiculous. this is what democrats are going to do but they're going push hard on their own process. >> the president also wanted witnesses to testify until mitch mccaonnell told him no, that wouldn't be a good idea. but it was the president who said i want to hear from people who can clear my name and suddenly the republicans are

saying, oh, no. >> on the obstruction thing, i think david might find this interesting or have a comment on it. it turns out during the nixon impeachment, hillary clinton went and did some research on how many times presidents had been accused of obstructing congress thinking this would be a rare occurrence. as it turns out, every president from george washington forward was accused because that's a balance of power issue. i'm a house guy. that's a balance of power issue that literally -- not in an impeachment trial so she said let's not use this and it got published. you can look at the publication of the research from the nixon -- and i don't know if you have any -- >> the difference is that nixon sent witnesses up to the hill to testify. nixon sent documents. >> talking about obstructing congress as an impeachment issue. >> that was the question he faced of obstruction. and he actually turned over the tapes when the court ruled. there was oversight, checks and balances. >> my point is that every president since washington had

been accused at some point of obstructing congress because the legislative branch does that to the executive branch. >> of course about an individual subpoena or an individual witness. what we have seen here and never before in american history is a complete refusal to produce any witnesses or any documents. that's why he's being impeached, not because they're having a fight about an individual subpoena. >> yeah, but this is a political issue. the american people are looking at this and this is why the impeachment has been going down like this in terms of people's interest. >> mike -- >> accusing him of obstruction of justice -- i'm agreeing with your original point. when you have an article of impeachment on obstruction of justice, the people go, oh, that's just congress fighting. >> i would say, mike, on the polls for a second because i know this is a favorite talking point of you and others. almost 50% of the public thinks the president should be impeached and removed from office. that is a number that has gone up since last summer. it's gone up for independents. it's gone up and down, yes, but

the numbers have moved. and for democrats, this is not as big of a political loser, i think, and we've seen that by how many of the moderates have come out and actually chosen to do what they think is right. but it is democrats are united on this. that's something that people are mindful of too. >> suffolk usa today poll had trump leading all of the democrat rivals for president while this is going on. in the battleground states his numbers are getting better according to the emerson poll. and you have these moderate members saying i might lose my seat over there but i'm going to do it because i think it's the right thing to do. >> it is a politically difficult thing for them to do, but at the same time the democrats in their districts also feel strongly. >> polls go either way. biden is ahead by 7. every democrat is ahead by a margin over trump in a different national poll that came out this week. we've got new comments from senate democratic leader chuck schumer warning the president not to tangle with speaker pelosi. and a democratic congresswoman

joins me to discuss the support and pushback she's received ever since declaring herself a yes for impeachment. so is t-mobile's newest, most powerful signal. and we want to keep you connected with the new iphone 11. so t-mobile is giving you an iphone 11 on us for each new line of unlimited. for yourself, your family or your small business. keep everyone connected and hurry into t-mobile today, to get up to 4 iphone 11s on us. only at t-mobile. ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪

♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ wheyou want relief... fast. only thermacare ultra pain relieving cream has 4 active ingredients to fight pain 4 different ways. get powerful relief today, with thermacare. dimitri's on it. eating right and getting those steps in? on it! dimitri thinks he's doing all he can to manage his type 2 diabetes and heart disease,

but is his treatment doing enough to lower his heart risk? [sfx: glasses clanking.] sorry. maybe not. jardiance can reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults who also have known heart disease. so it could help save your life from a heart attack or stroke. and it lowers a1c! jardiance can cause serious side effects including dehydration, genital yeast or urinary tract infections, and sudden kidney problems. ketoacidosis is a serious side effect that may be fatal. a rare, but life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this bacterial infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction. do not take jardiance if you are on dialysis or have severe kidney problems. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. lower a1c and lower risk of a fatal heart attack? on it... with jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance. with jardiance. i looitaly!avel. yaaaaass. with the united explorer card, i get rewarded wherever i go. going out for a bite.

rewarded! going new places. rewarded! anytime. rewarded! getting more for getting away. rewarded! learn more at the explorer card dot com. and get... rewarded!

democrats have been firing back at the letter president trump sent upon speaker nancy pelosi. you heard speaker pelosi's response basically blowing it off. a short time ago senate democratic leader chuck schumer weighed in, warning the president not to tangle with speaker pelosi. >> well, he's obviously under a great deal of duress, but if he thinks he can bully nancy pelosi to backing off, he's with the wrong customer. the amazing thing about president trump as president and before, the very things he does, he accuses others of doing. bully. this is the most bullying president we've ever had. accusing people of things. this president accuses people of things all the time, every day. so he ought to look into the mirror. >> back with our team, political and legal analysts. mike, during the break you were saying you worked on the hill

with the gingrich time. you see mistakes being repeated. >> oh, yeah. >> by democrats. >> i highly recommend everyone watch the a & e special "the clinton affair" and watch it while this is going on to compare. it's brilliant. it's really well done. >> you know you are a political nerd when you are going to itunes to get -- >> but i also lived it. i see democrats making some of the very same -- many of the very same mistakes that we made in 1998. >> like what? >> first of all, the investigation shifted with clinton from one thing to the next thing to the next thing and finally it was like we got him. so what that did was tell the american people you were just trying to find him on something, this is political. secondly, republicans hated bill clinton, viscerally hated him. you just heard chuck schumer on there. we had henry hyde, and he would very dryly talk about the law. there was eight counts of criminality in the starr report,

criminality. we couldn't help ourselves. chuck schumer, he's a bully. the things that he does, he lies all the time. so their messaging starts to drift into how much we just hate donald trump as opposed to the actual thing we should be talking about. >> the only problem with that view is that he does lie all the time. and what are they supposed to do, ignore that? what are they supposed to do -- >> do you want to impeach him and have the country with you or call him a liar? >> how about both? what's the problem with both. >> bill clinton was a liar. we kept calling him a liar and the country said you're just trying to get him. i'm just saying the democrats are making a lot of the same mistakes we made. >> you have to remember what he lied about compared to going to a foreign country and jeopardizing national security. >> bill clinton had eight criminal referrals. criminal referrals. he was disbarred. we have an obligation to talk about this.

this is my conscience. we have to impeach him. we don't have a choice. our right wing forced it into us. >> bill clinton lied about sex. >> that was their message, it was only about sex. >> this is about the president of the united states going to a foreign power to get dirt on his political rival. there's one more political difference between now and clinton. at the time, and david gergen and jeffrey toobin will remember this and gloria probably too. at the time support for impeachment was in the 20s and bill clinton's popularity was in the 70s. >> exactly. >> that is quite different from what we're looking at. >> i actually agree with you on some of this. listen, i think nancy pelosi has been terrific. you have to give her a lot of credit. but the democratic messaging on this has not worked well. it's been sort of -- you know, it's so many different things. i think the country has gotten tired of how repetitive the conversation has been over the last several weeks. >> but one thing chuck schumer said in that erin burnett

interview is why donald trump won. erin burnett said he's not impartial, are you impartial? yes, i am. that's why donald trump won and why he'll win again because he was lying. we all know he's lying. everyone watching knows he's lying. chuck schumer is not impartial. but that's what politicians in d.c. do. why would i hold him accountable because he told the truth. he told the truth, it's a rare thing in d.c. >> and lindsey graham came out and said, you know, i'm not an impartial juror. >> i'm saying this is why the voters elected trump because they don't care about the fact checking when they see chuck schumer do something like that. >> you say you're a hill guy. you must care at some point, at someplace in your psyche about whether we maintain the institutioning and the traditions that this guys running over dismiss i'vely, mcconnell is beginning to run over now. you must worry about the legacy of the republican party at this point. >> i do. one of the thing i worry about

also is when it becomes so partisan. and many people have warned about this. that we go all the way to impeachment for something like this as opposed to a censure vote or bringing it out to the public and say let the voters decide in an election. and so i care a lot about the institution and norms and i think they're being trampled by the democrats in this case. >> but i think -- and i keep going back to nancy pelosi again on this because at first she said that impeachment wasn't worth it, that trump wasn't worth it. so she wasn't for impeachment. then came the phone call with ukraine, the withholding of the meeting and funds and the president not asking to investigate corruption but in fact asking for an announcement of an investigation of corruption. when you put all of that together, her point of view was, and i think these moderate democrats' point of view is how can we not pay attention to that? and if you just censure the president, what does that mean? >> it doesn't protect us -- >> it says to the voters you're in charge of deciding who the voter is, not politicians.

>> what does that mean anyway? >> censure also implies a certain acceptance of responsibility on the part of the person who engaged in the misconduct, not someone who says that the phone call was maybe flawed or maybe okay. he says it was perfect. what human being talks about their own behavior as perfect. i've never met anyone like that. but the president says that. so how can you respond to that except by confronting it? >> mike, i think if you look at the circumstance now, what the republican party is doing is they are normalizing that any president, a democrat or republican, can go to a foreign power and seek political dirt on their opponent. that is what's happening right now. that's your republican party and that's what they're doing. >> the democrats are normalizing using political attacks to impeach someone. if joe biden gets elected president, do you think republicans will try to impeach him? based on this i think they probably will. >> if joe biden goes to a foreign ally or adversary and seeks political dirt on mitt romney or some republican, i would say he should be impeached.

>> if joe biden brags about how he got a foreign government to do something that related to his son, that's enough for an investigation. for the house republicans. you can't make the normalization argument when you watch how democrats are behaving. they are not above anything normalization. and secondly, the american people are sick are us wanting to normalize things when their lives aren't being made better. >> do you agree -- do you believe the fundamental accusation by democrats, which is that the president was asking for a favor for a foreign power to investigate his political rival? >> no, i don't. you and i have talked about this so i know you're not going to like my response. joe biden was the sitting vice president of the united states. it is legitimate for the united states to ask another country was our sitting vice president as the official duties of the vice president doing something corrupt. >> but there's absolutely no evidence of that. >> you have to have an investigation -- >> no, wait a second. we know. joe biden was representing the

view and the position of the united states government, the european union as well as the imf. he was asking for the firing of somebody that the ukrainian people were asking to be fired. >> and you don't think there's any conflict when his son is sitting on a company that was being investigated by the people -- >> the person he wanted to be fired was not investigating burisma at the time. >> so no conflict. >> no. >> we've got to move on. the thing i don't understand about your argument, i hear your point of view on this, is that if he believes there was corruption and the bidens were corrupt, there are levers within the united states to investigate the corruption by the vice president of the united states. there's email trails. why go to a power which you claim is corrupt to launch an investigation which theoretically because they are corrupt would be corrupt? why not use the fbi or the treasury department or whomever? that makes no sense. >> i believe he was asking the new leader of the country to work with us and announce you're going to go and do something on

that. >> he doesn't launch an investigation in the united states. >> furthermore -- >> there's no investigation in the united states, correct? >> the other reason why this thing falls apart is because the aid was never held up. >> that's just not true. we've got to take a break. on the eve of the house vote on impeachment, rallies are under way in several cities here. you're looking at portland, oregon. demonstrators calling for president trump's removal from office. we're talk it over with a democrat from a swing district who announced she will vote for impeachment. she had a town hall a few days ago facing criticism in the crowd for that decision. we'll talk to her next. when i rent a car, i never compromise.

too shabby! too much! i can rent this? for that price? absolutely. it's just right! book your just right rental at thrifty.com.

skip to the good part with alka-seltzer plus. it's just right! now with 25% more concentrated power. nothing works faster for powerful cold relief. oh, what a relief it is! so fast!

more breaking news tonight. rallies supporting the impeachment of president trump are under way in several cities. a coalition of liberal groups organized the demonstrations across the united states. this comes on the eve of the historic vote on two articles of impeachment in the full house tomorrow. some members of congress are still deciding how they're going to vote. first term michigan democrat alyssa slotkin, who represents a swimming district, says she will support impeachment. the white house is hitting pack saying she, quote, sold out her constituents. the congresswoman faced applause, some outrage when she explained her decision yesterday at a town hall meeting. take a look. >> the thing that was different for me is this very, very basic idea that the president of the united states would reach out to a foreign power and ask for an investigation for personal political gain. while we may not agree, i hope you believe me when i tell you that i made this decision out of principle and out of the duty to protect and defend the constitution. i feel that in my bones, and i

will stick to that regardless of what it does to me politically because this is bigger than politics. [ cheering ] >> congresswoman alyssa slotkin joins us now. that's a really hard thing to do and i respect any politician who is able to accept the protests, hear it, deliver what they want to say and yet still do it in a way that is respectful. >> yeah. i mean that's the job, right? before i ran in 2017, i remember my representative wouldn't show up for town halls, and it was the big health care vote. and i remember saying you don't get to just choose to ignore your constituents, so how could i go and do the same thing. >> you've said this is the last thing you wanted to be doing in your first term as a congressperson. >> yeah. listen, i got into this because i wanted to work on issues that help people's lives. and for me, you know, it's one of the most serious things that you can do as a congressperson is to be involved in an

impeachment. and i just -- that's not what i wanted to be spending my time on. >> is it something that the voters in your district, supporters of the president or not supporters of the president have been talking to you about through -- i mean was the mueller report something they were talking to you about? is this something that's foremost on their minds? or is it health care, prescription drug prices, all the rest? >> honestly it's like the kitchen table issues. a town hall attracts a crowd, that's for sure. >> you're getting larger crowds now. >> we're definitely getting larger crowds. but i'm a congresswoman so i shop at weird hours. if i'm going to a target or kroger at 9:30 at night and going shopping, there's very few people there. i cannot get through the grocery store without someone grabbing me by the arm and talking to me about the price of health care, that they can't afford their son's insulin, they couldn't send their daughter to summer camp because they couldn't afford four inhalers that were required by camp. these are the things people are talking about. how they do better in their lives, not frankly impeachment,

the mueller report. >> so if earlier we had a panel on and people were saying, look, if -- jen psaki said as soon as it's done democrats want to talk about other stuff that the voters are caring about. if that is the case, why go through this impeachment if it's taking away focus from things that voters care about? >> listen, i'm a former cia officer. i will tell you, you don't get to pick everything that you work on. sometimes the world happens to you. and in this case, for me, you know, i resisted and did not want to be involved in impeachment for many, many months. and then the facts changed. and then in september, you know, this very, very simple idea. it really isn't complicated for me. when i heard the president and his lawyer acknowledge that they reached out to a foreign leader to ask for help in an american political system, in our system, that for me was different. that for me was severe. and all through the inquiry, when i went back and really looked at all the documents,

they were supporting that same idea. and that can't be normal. >> so to the people who were in your town hall who are supporting the president and don't like your decision, who say, well, why not let the voters decide, we have an election coming up. >> that's where i was for many months. i had colleague who say sort of right out of the gate were supportive of impeachment in january of last year or this past year. i had colleagues who came out after the mueller report. for me, i really kept saying, you know, i don't like the president's conduct, but let 2020 decide. and then the president talked about bringing foreigners and getting them involved in the very election i was depending on to have a democratic process. and this was prospective, not retrospecti retrospective. we were talking about a future election, not 2016, not what happened in the past. to me that is just fundamentally different. he asked a foreigner to help investigate a political rival. he used the power of his office. and not for the national security interests, which is totally normal, right? i worked for president bush, i

worked for president obama. it is totally normal for a president to wield their power, right? that's typical. for the national security interests of the country. we put the screws to countries all the time. but this is for personal gain. it was for him. and that's -- that's what a king does. that's not what a president does. >> congresswoman slotkin, i appreciate your time. >> thank you. up next, a group of republicans are forming a group with a single purpose to ensure his defeat in next year's election. we'll be right back. as a cio, you want to move your business forward.

but when your team is always dealing with device setups, app updates, and support calls... you can never seem to get anywhere. that's why dell technologies created unified workspace, powered by vmware. ♪ a revolutionary solution that lets you deploy, manage, support and secure all your devices from the cloud. so you can stop going in circles, and start moving forward.

sarah's last tuition payment, sent off. feeling good? oh yeah. now i'm ready to focus on my project. ♪ ♪ this is why we plan. ♪ ♪ you never cease to amaze me, maya. see how investing with a j.p. morgan advisor can help you. visit your local chase branch.

the republicans who have never shied away from criticizing president trump now in an op-ed in "the new york times" band together and go much further. in a piece head lined "we are republicans and want trump defeated" they formed a political action committee called the lincoln project and want to defeat him and what they call trumpism. republicans have embraced and copied mr. trump's cruelty and defended and even adopted his corruption. they have replaced trumpism, an empty faith led by a bogus

prophet. among the authors is george conway, the husband of kellyanne conway, counselor to the president, and rick wilson, the author of "everything trump touches dies." rick joins me now. so, rick, how does the super pac plan to defeat president trump and trumpism at the ballot box? >> anderson, one of the tools that we have at our disposal is about 120 years of collective political experience and knowledge and the ability to use a lot of the tools we built over time on behalf of the republican party in order to try to save the country from a president who los angeles sort of hollowed out the old gop like a parasite from the inside out and to apply some pressure onto the people that are his enablers and supporters and hopefully to be able to engage in enough commitments to go into the swing states where the race will be decided in 2020 and to make a meaningful difference. remember, donald trump won by about 77,000 votes in the three swing states in the upper midwest.

we believe that there are a number of folks out there who are not comfortable with trump, who are clearly not happy with the direction he's taken this country, and that they're reachable. we're not trying to convince the hard-core red hat maga guys, but there's a huge swath of people, republicans, soft democrats, independents, who pulled the trigger for donald trump in 2016. we believe they're gettable, we believe they can be moved and that's why we formed this project because we believe it's vital to put our country and the security and the stability of our country over the partisan instinct that we ordinarily would have stuck with as republicans. >> but given that elections so far in the u.s. are a binary choice, aren't you dependent on who the democratic candidate is? so it's a hard sell until you know especially who the democrat candidate would be. >> it's an easy sell that donald trump is a profoundly corrupt and profoundly unstable person.

we know that part going in. the democrats -- we're not trying to make decisions for the democratic party. we're not trying to tell them who to pick as their nominee or how to run their messaging. we are trying to make sure that we have a set of tools in the toolbox that puts donald trump in a position where he won't have an easy, open field, especially because there are a lot of people on our side who can in some ways punch harder and cut deeper than the democratic nominee or the democratic party will be able to. >> so you're talking beyond trying to raise money to get ads in swing districts? >> we are. >> you're talking about getting republicans out campaigning essentially? not campaigning for themselves but just campaigning against president trump? >> anderson, one of the things we want to do is put trump's enablers on notice that there is a political and a moral cost to supporting a president who is engaged in behavior that is corrupt at best and corrosive

almost every day to our norms and our democracy. and so we want to be able to go out into the swing states and say to people who are protecting donald trump, you know, there are some folks out here who are going to come and ring your bell and bring some effective messaging and effective political targeting into this process. appeared the group of us, and it's an expanding group, by the way. you would be shocked how many people have reached out inside the republican world that aren't hard trumpers today to say let me help, get me involved. we're certainly feeling like there's a lot of uplift to this thing and there's a prospect to do some real good. as i said, to put the country before the political fortunes of donald trump. >> rick wilson, always good to have you on. >> thank you, anderson. still to come, the rules committee is wrapping up and we're starting to see what tomorrow's big day is going to look like. we've got a live update from capitol hill. (children playing)

(dog barking) ♪ (music building) experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment.

the holidays are here and so is t-mobile's newest, most powerful signal. and we want to keep you connected with the new iphone 11. so t-mobile is giving you an iphone 11 on us for each new line of unlimited. for yourself, your family or your small business. keep everyone connected and hurry into t-mobile today, to get up to 4 iphone 11s on us. only at t-mobile. i am all about livi♪g joyfully.

hello. the united explorer card hooks me up. getting more for getting away. rewarded! going new places and tasting new flavors. rewarded! traveling lighter. rewarded. haha, boom! getting settled. rewarded. learn more at the explorer card dot com. and get... rewarded!

let's check in with chris and see what's up for "cuomo prime time." >> we all know the president doubled down on dumb and history. i'm going to bring in tom reed, republican from western new york who defends the president. i have john podesta on tonight to talk about what it was like during clinton and how they handled things differently and why. we're also going to cover that murder on morningside heights. i haven't seen a crime like that, coop, since the central park 5. there is a problem in this country with crime, including homicide, and this is an ugly example of who is doing it. this is kids this time. we're taking a look.

it matters. >> setting the stage for impeachment night. what is happening tonight on capital hill. llergens. if it's not from irobot, it's not a roomba™. we need a solution.ut their phones down. introducing... smartdogs. the first dogs trained to train humans. stopping drivers from: liking. selfie-ing. and whatever this is. available to the public... never. smartdogs are not the answer. but geico has a simple tip. turn on "do not disturb while driving" mode. brought to you by geico.

how did you find great-grandma's recipe? we're related to them? we're portuguese? i thought we were hungarian? grandpa, can you tell me the story again? behind every question is a story waiting to be discovered. skip to the good part with alka-seltzer plus. behind every question now with 25% more concentrated power. nothing works faster for powerful cold relief. oh, what a relief it is! so fast!

too shabby! too much! i can rent this? for that price? absolutely. it's just right! book your just right rental at thrifty.com.

as we said at the tom p of e program, rules have to be set in place. in a has been going on into the evening in the house rules committee. that's where phil mattingly has been watching and listening. what's the status of the hearing now? >> reporter: we are almost done, which is saying a lot after about ten-plus hours in the course of the day. the debate has been what you've seen over the last eight, nine, ten weeks. the republicans very certain to oppose the republicans in this move and democrats believe they have a case, a solid case and a kaes th case that leads them to believe that both of the articles of impeachment are merited and will likely have the votes tomorrow. it's important to note what this process was throughout the course of today is setting up the rules of the road for

tomorrow, laying out how the debate will actually work. we have an idea of what democrats are proposing, something they should vote on here for a couple of minutes, depending on what other issues republicans raise. there will be six hours of debate on the two articles of impeachment. those will be divided evenly between the republicans and democrats. any members who want to speak can log their questions or log their effort to speak at the moment with their leaders and will likely get an opportunity to do that tomorrow. you're not going to see leaders speaking for an hour a tt a tim they'll like li they'll likely break into two-minute increments. they'll also have a vote on a resolution to appoint managers for people when they move over to the senate for a trial, crucial things to keep an eye on, laying out the path forward. we at least know what the rules

are the road are going to be tomorrow when the house takes up this historic moment leading to this historic vote. >> you said six hours of debate and then they're going to vote on the managers. and then the actual impeachment. >> yeah. so they'll do six hours of debate and then have a vote on the two articles of impeachment. they made the point of separating the two articles of impeachment. even though they were in the same nine-page resolution, each article will receive a full vote. we heard jarrett golden from maine say he was going to vote yes on one article and no on another. you can split votes but we don't expect that to happen often. over the corse of the durse ofae will be a vote and then a vote on the two aurlrticles of impeachment. if you know you're going to have a vote on the managers, there's

no doubt the articles of impeachment will pass, it's a matter of when. and that will be dictated on what hurdles republicans throw up in the process. we know the rules of the road, six hours of debate spread evenly, then a vote on the two articles and vote on the managers. here on capitol hill there has been quite pa parlor game on who speaker pelosi will pick to present this case to the united states senate. >> i got to set my alarm clock. what time tomorrow does this start? >> you'll want to be paying attention at 9 a.m. tomorrow morning. there will be an hour of debate on the rule itself what they're working on tonight, starting around 10, sometime after 10. once they're done with that, that will kick off the debate itself. speaker pelosi in the letter she sent to the entire caucus, talking about the stakes, talking about the moment for her caucus, why this is a somber issue but the most important issue they have to vote on, she made clear she wants all the members of her caucus to be on

the house floor tomorrow when the house floor opens up. there will be votes early. they want everybody there to be a part of this, underscoring how important this moment is, anderson. >> phil mattingly, you'll be there 9 a.m. tomorrow. i'll be covering it with wolf and jake tapper and all the rest. i want to hand it over to chris for "cuomo prime time." >> thank you very. excellent coverage tonight. i'm chris cuomo. reality is setting in for this president. he is about to be impeached in all likelihood. what's unreal is how in this final moment that could define how this goes, he's trying to burn down the house in a letter for the ages that the speaker is calling sick tonight. here's the letter, but you will not believe what's in it but more importantly what it does to this president. it is some the wildest trump arguments yet. a night like this, compared with what bill clinton did, we'll do that