conclusion whether the president did anything legal, illegal, wrong, impeachable and let it be decided on the merits of the evidence that they bring forth. they're not willing to do that. that's a shameful act. >> let's bring in garrett graf on this. it's interesting. you know who the gop senators should be upset at is the white house because they put them in this box by blocking access to all these people. now they do have to deal with it. and they've got the rules the way they want through votes but we'll see how it goes forward. what's your take on this dynamic? >> one of the sort of important points to raise in the context of why the house moved quickly on impeachment, adam schiff made the point tonight, this is an ongoing conspiracy that the house democrats were trying to arrest. the fundamental underlying charges in this case deal with the president's attempt to bring foreign interference into the future 2020 election. so this is something that is still unfolding and that the house didn't feel like it had,

you know, months or years to try to play this out in the courts. and i think it's important to take that step back and look at the broader geopolitical context of why this impeachment was rushed and it's because we're dealing with someone that isn't a break-in that happened at the democratic national committee two years ago, this is something that the president is actively trying to commit a criminal conspiracy in the midst of our ongoing presidential election. >> that is the argument. all right. let's hold on for a second. let's get one of the participants in here. we have senator bob casey from pennsylvania. thank you very much for joining us, senator, after what had to be a really long day. >> chris, thanks. good to be on with you. >> so tell us about it. what's it like to be in this room in that capacity? you've been a senator since 2006. this is your first go at this. what was it like in the room? >> well, chris, it's a very grave matter we're dealing with. you're dealing with a president clearly i think by the evidence

who solicited the interference of a foreign government in the upcoming election and also as part of that made a request to that government to investigate a political opponent and at the same time to investigate a debunked loopy theory about the last election. so it's a grave matter. i think senators take it very seriously. but i was frustrated, as we all were today, that republicans were voting over and over again not to allow witnesses or documents. and the further you get into the questions we could ask those witnesses and the information we could derive from documents you realize how much more could be added to what already is a substantial record. >> you had a 100-0 vote with clinton on the rules of the road among senators. every vote today except for one was right along party lines. what does that tell you? >> well, it does tell me one

thing, that the clinton trial was dramatically different in this sense. i think it's a very important point to make. you had an investigation which was a very lengthy investigation by ken starr. the record of that voluminous investigation formed the basis of that trial. and you had lots of documents. documents and witnesses who had already been interviewed and their testimony is part of the record. even in the clinton trial, which is a much simpler matter, you had three witnesses. the andrew johnson trial a lot more than that. i forget the number but i think it's in the range of about 40. look, it doesn't make any sense when you have the gravity of the offenses that are charged, the importance and the gravity of the decision, the determination we have to make about removal or guilt or not guilty. it makes no sense not to have witnesses. and the idea we're going to get

to it next week or in a few days i think later in this case means never. >> in terms of the wear and tear and the focus that is necessary, you're one of the young guns in the senate. you're not even 60 yet. >> i'm about to be. >> well, that's in april. we're not there yet. a lot can change between now and then. 66 out of 100 senators are older than 60. what did you see in that room? people nodding off? you don't have to say who but give us a little color from in that room. >> i think the expectations were probably low in terms of going into the night and having everyone be paying attention, but i saw almost no, you know, disconnect. people were very focused. when the chief justice walked's in, people would rise. even late into the night. and be there for the presentation. so i was especially impressed by

that. >> no phones? >> and i think that's why -- i think people understand the gravity of what we're dealing with. >> absolutely. but that's a long time, especially on a day of procedural votes essentially. right? you knew there weren't going to be arguments today. you didn't see anybody nodding off, nothing, added a little levity to the moment? >> i did not. i saw no nodding off today. >> today. right? you've got a long way to go. what did you think about a couple of different things? the chief justice early in this process, literally the first day, admonishing both sides. and it came at that moment a little bit later on when they -- the counsel started to go more nose to nose with each other directly. i'll play a little for the audience. >> i think it is appropriate at this point for me to admonish both the house managers and the president's counsel in equal terms to remember that they are addressing the world's greatest deliberative body. one reason it has earned that title is because its members

avoid speaking in a manner and using language that is not conducive to civil discourse. in the 1905 swing trial a senator objected when one of the managers used the word pettifogging and the presiding officer said the word ought not to have been used. i don't think we need to aspire to that high a standard but i do think those address the senate should remember where they are. >> what did you think of that, senator? >> i don't fault him for that. it's part of his jb. and if he believed that there was a breakdown or a degradation of some of the decorum then that's his -- that's a determination he makes. that's part of his job. >> but what do you think about that enforcement of civil discourse? certainly something we haven't seen in big supply in politics these days. >> look, it's bound to happen. these are strongly held beliefs on both sides and differing

opinions. and again, i think the weight of this is such that you're going to have a lot of fierce argumentation. but i think what came out of tonight was a re clevery clear demonstration of a fundamental difference when it comes to witnesses and documents. this idea we'll get to it later i just don't think is the reality. i think there's an effort to rush. and i do think that the word "cover-up" is not too strong a word in this instance. it seems like from the beginning leader mcconnell has tried to design this resolution which would govern -- which will govern the trial now now that it's passed even though we voted against it. i think he's designed it in the president's favor. what i don't understand is why would a republican majority and a republican president be afraid to put any republican witnesses under oath? but most of the witnesses we've seen already have been under oath in the house were republicans. these are republican officials

and we're only asking for four who would be under oath. why are you concerned about that? why would you fear that? you should embrace it because some of that testimony may be in your favor. but for some reason they seem to want, unless there's? dramatic change in the next couple of hours or days, they seem to want no witnesses. and that doesn't make a lot of sense. >> senator casey, you'll probably hear a lot more of the same tomorrow as you did today in the context of why the republicans believe they've heard enough already. thank you very much, sir, on such an important day for taking us inside the room and what you expect going forward. good luck to you in discharging your duty. >> thanks, chris. >> all right. let's take a little break here. 13 hours of action on the senate floor. not of action. 13 hours of the ongoing debates. let's not overstate it. very important in terms of history, but this is hard to focus on for long periods. and that's what they'll have to do, who knows for how long.

the swain trial that the chief justice referred to about decorum, that took three months. let's take a break and come back and tell you what is most likely for tomorrow. next. aaaah! nooooo... nooooo... quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker and is 2x more absorbent. bounty, the quicker picker upper.

on iphone 11 that will have youh seeing double. right now, switch to t-mobile and get 2 lines of unlimited for only $90 and 2 iphone 11s on us. all on t-mobile's newest, most powerful signal that goes farther than ever before. get twice the deal, 2 lines of unlimited for $90 and 2 iphone 11s on us. ♪ only at t-mobile. what's going on? it's the 3pm slump. should have had a p3. oh yeah. should have had a p3. need energy? get p3. with a mix of meat, cheese and nuts.

robinwithout the commission fees. so, you can start investing today wherever you are - even hanging with your dog. so, what are you waiting for? download now and get your first stock on us. robinhood. were cooking with mom. she always said, "food is love," so when she moved in with us, a new kitchen became part of our financial plan. ♪ i want to make the most of every meal we have together. ♪ at northwestern mutual, our version of financial planning helps you live your dreams today. find a northwestern mutual advisor at nm dot com. helps you live your dreams today.

because the tempur-breeze™makes stransfers heat. away from your body. so you feel cool, night after night. and now tempur-pedic is ranked number one by jd power in customer satisfaction with retail mattresses. dana-farber cancer institute discovered the pd-l1 pathway. pd-l1. they changed how the world fights cancer. blocking the pd-l1 protein, lets the immune system attack, attack, attack cancer. pd-l1 transformed, revolutionized, immunotherapy. pd-l1 saved my life.

saved my life. saved my life. what we do here at dana-faber, changes lives everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. everywhere. all right. the first day of the impeachment trial of president donald john trump has been a long one. cnn's jeff zeleny will tell you whatever you didn't get to see yourself. >> the senate will convene as a court of impeachment. >> reporter: president trump's impeachment trial opening with pageantry and prayer. >> keep us from dishonor. >> reporter: and ending a long first day with a clear partisan

divide. after an acrimonious fight over whether the senate should hear from new witnesses. >> we're not going to have an epiphany a few days from now and suddenly say okay, the american people do deserve the answers. their whole goal is that you never get to that point. >> reporter: there was a surprising concession from senate majority leader mitch mcconnell. amid an uproar from democrats and pressure from key republicans, mcconnell suddenly allowing an extra day for opening arguments, extending presentations to three days for each side rather than two marathon overnight sessions. >> so the eyes are on the senate. the country is watching to see if we can rise to the occasion. >> reporter: mcconnell also signing off on another key change. automatically admitting evidence from the house impeachment proceedings without a vote of the senate. a move aimed at easing criticism that republicans were not intent on holding a fair trial. with chief justice john roberts

presiding at the front of the senate chamber -- >> without objection so order. do i bang the gavel? >> reporter: senators stayed seated and silent as the debate stretched long into the night over rules governing the trial. the last-minute shift by mcconnell so swift the changes were handwritten on the official resolution did nothing to ease a far more contentious fight. whether new documents or witnesses would be allowed in the senate trial. the democrats lost that fight again and again on the first day of debate but didn't make it easy for republicans. >> i would ask consent to ask the democratic leader, since there's a certain similarity to all these amendments, whether he might be willing to enter into a consent agreement to stack these votes. >> without objection the inquiry is permitted. >> thank you, mr. chief justice. the bottom line is very simple. as has been clear to every senator and the country, we believe witnesses and documents

are extremely important and a compelling case has been made for them. but we will not back off on getting votes on all of these amendments, which we regard as extremely significant and important to the country. >> reporter: adam schiff, chairman of the house intelligence committee and a democratic impeachment manager, said relentless white house obstruction made new evidence and witness testimony critical. >> the house calls john bolton. the house calls mick mulvaney. let's get this trial started. shall we? we are ready to present our case. we are ready to call our witnesses. the question is will you let us? >> reporter: schiff and his team spent much of the day trying to persuade senators why hearing new testimony was critical to the trial. >> you will vote to find the president guilty or not guilty, to find his conduct yich peachable or not impeachable. the most important question is the question you must answer today. will the president and the american people get a fair trial? >> reporter: democrats so the to

call a string of witnesses, including former national security adviser john bolton, who has offered to testify if subpoenaed. >> ambassador bolton has come forward and publicly confirmed that he was a witness to important events. if we know there's evidence that's not yet come out, all of us should want to hear it. >> reporter: democrats also hope to call white house chief of staff mick mulvaney. >> mr. mulvaney perhaps more than any other administration witness excepting the president has firsthand insight into the decision to withhold $391 million in military and security aid to a vulnerable ukraine without justification. >> reporter: as the debate wore on, democratic efforts to call witnesses were defeated on partisan lines. after declining to participate in the house impeachment inquiry last year, white house counsel pat cipollone forcefully argued against new witnesses.

>> and they asked that the case be mooted. and now they come here and they ask you to issue a subpoena for john bolton. it's not right. >> reporter: the president's legal team also said most white house officials would be protected by executive privilege. >> here's the law. communications made by presidential advisers in the course of preparing advice for the president come under the presidential communications privilege. >> reporter: president's lawyers forcefully argued against new witnesses and offered a rare public outline of their defense on the two articles of impeachment, abuse of power and obstruction of congress. >> we came hoping to have a trial. they spent the entire day telling you and the american people that they can't prove their case. i could have told you that in five minutes and saved us all a lot of time. >> reporter: senators will have another chance to consider

whether to hear new evidence later in the trial. democrats made clear they would keep making their case, hoping to win over the four republicans needed to subpoena witnesses. >> if he can't be indicted and he can't be impeached and he can't be removed, then he can't be held accountable. that is inconsistent with the united states constitution. >> and if this body is truly committed to a fair trial, it cannot let the president play a game of keep-away and dictate what evidence the senators can and cannot see bearing on his guilt or innocence. he is trying to cheat to win. >> so after a long day here, chris, one thing is clear. there will not be witnesses at this point in the trial. several republican senators have said they will consider it in the next phase of the trial. so certainly the acrimony was

present today. the case was made as well. it begins anew i would say tomorrow, but it's actually later today, this afternoon, when the senators reconvene at 1:00 p.m. they're also going to be talking about motions to go forward. but senator schumer was asked moments ago as he left the capitol what his strategy was. he said, look, i wanted the country to see that democrats are for new documents and witnesses and republicans simply are not. chris? >> well, that message was certainly conveyed many times over. jeff zeleny, thank you very much. appreciate it. tough day. long. no phones. no talking. no escape. this is just the beginning, however, and this is history. and it's not about not wanting to do the job. it's about how you cope, how you focus, how you be at your best for this country. let's discuss. next.

[♪] are you currently using a whitening toothpaste, but not seeing results? try crest 3d whitestrips. its enamel-safe formula lifts and removes stains to provide 100% noticeably whiter teeth or your money back. try crest 3d whitestrips.

we all use our cellphones very differently. (vo) why the french family chose verizon. so, she's always on social media. he's always watching sports. someone's video chatting her friends. hi, gianna! my parents are getting older so knowing that i can get in touch with them at any time is really comforting. grandma, you're on tv! (grandma) wow! what channel? (vo) the network more people rely on, gives you more. like plans your family can mix and match starting at just $35. and a year of disney+ on us. plus, up to $700 toward our best phones when you switch. that's verizon. (mom vo) we got a subaru to give him some ato reconnect and be together. and once we did that, we realized his greatest adventure is just beginning. (vo) welcome to the most adventurous outback ever. the all-new subaru outback. go where love takes you.

and you know what they isay about curiosity. it'll ruin your house. so get allstate and be better protected from mayhem, like meow.

can you help keep these iguys protected online?? easy, connect to the xfi gateway. what about internet speeds that keep up with my gaming? let's hook you up with the fastest internet from xfinity. what about wireless data options for the family? of course, you can customize and save. can you save me from this conversation? that we can't do, but come in and see what we can do. we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. ask. shop. discover. at your local xfinity store today.

day one, 13 hours long. senators were bound to fight -- find ways to fight the teedium. certainly going to be some yawns, some note taking. can't be checking your e-mail, though. you're not supposed to have your phone. athena jones has been following it all on capitol hill. presidential historian tim naftali also joins me. athena, great to see you. what did you hear? i tried to get senator bob casey to give me some color in there about what he saw, he didn't see. he didn't give me anything. he said he didn't see anybody doing anything other than paying studious attention. >> well, luckily we had a whole -- a bunch of our cnn hill team in the senate gallery

watching hour after hour as this trial inched along, as this debate inched along, and saw the mood kind of light at the beginning, senators chatting with each other, whispering, even though they take -- there's a proclamation at the beginning of every day saying that all should keep silence on pain of imprisonment. there was some talking. but over the course of the debate, over the many hours you saw a lot of people clearly taking a toll on them. folks yawning, getting up to stretch their legs. early on there was note passing, sometimes with the help of pages who helped carry notes from one senator to the other or it fill water glasses. you saw people appearing to nod off at times or at least close their eyes and then pretty quickly straighten up in their chair a few minutes later. some people taking copious notes. of course we don't know what they were writing. but some of those note takers were interesting. people like cory gardner, the senator from colorado who's face a tough re-election battle. also susan collins, lisa

murkowski. some of the very folks, moderates we're going to be looking at to see whether they join democrats in the call for witnesses and documents later in the trial. they were taking copious notes. there was also a lot of candy, gum being shared. senator pat toomey of pennsylvania brought candy. some of it from hershey's, which is based in pennsylvania. and that sort of thing. a lot of senators trying to do all they could to pay attention, to stay awake and stretch their legs. >> athena, thank you very much. look, a lot of them in the room were hoping for open minds. but people know how they feel, it makes it even harder to watch all of it. a couple of points that came up a lot today, and i wanted historical perspective on them. first one was hey, look, this was fine for clinton, they did the witness voting after the opening statements. now you guys don't like it, you liked it just fine back then, it was 100-0. >> well, first things first, what happened the first day of the clinton trial?

it's really different and really interesting. first of all, the senate met in closed session. there weren't any cameras. and they met, all 100 of them, and they thrashed out a compromise. the resolution -- the clinton resolution was the product of a compromise drafted by ted kennedy and phil gramm. and they came to a conclusion that this was the way to go forward. they took a little it democratic approach, a little of the republican approach. how was that possible? that was possible because in 1999 the leadership of the democrats and of the republicans in the senate didn't want witnesses. they were afraid that the whole trial becoming a circus. they did not want -- i mean, the republicans too. trent lott. he was concerned because he had a lot of pressure from the house republicans saying we want kathleen willey, we want ms. broderick, we want -- juanita broderick. >> save lisa meyers or free lisa meyers -- >> what they wanted to do was to

broaden the case against clinton to involve other women about whom there was suspicion of sexual harassment. the senators, both republicans and democratic senators, did not want that to happen in the senate. so there was a mutual desire 079 part of both parties in the senate. >> but they had a full record there from starr. and here you have a completely incomplete record because they didn't get the same access -- >> but the argument i'm making is that the constitution lets it -- leaves it up to the senate to do what it wishes to do and do it how it wants to do it. it seems strange for me -- to me that everyone's hanging so much on this one precedent, which was such an entirely different case with different circumstances. and there's another big difference, and nobody's talking much about this, and it's important. this is the first time in our history that the president's party is trying the president in the senate. the president's party has never before controlled the senate in

a trial. you could argue that lincoln's party was the republican party, but andrew johnson was a democrat. it was a special unity ticket. in every case up to now the trial of the president has been by the other party. so to ask the president's party to have witnesses is to ask the president's party to do something that it doesn't want to do. now, the founders didn't want us to have parties because they anticipated this problem. but one of the weaknesses of the whole impeachment process is it requires members of congress to think constitutionally and not as partisans. the republicans are having a hard time doing that. >> so far. you're right. and that is a very interesting point. i hadn't thought of it. maybe one or two other people haven't as well. tim, thank you very much. appreciate it. athena as well. up next, you want to meet somebody who gives you a good reason that you may want witnesses here? how about somebody who you're just starting to hear about. trump donor robert hyde. he has been the subject of a lot

of wild allegations. and he makes one thing very clear. he stayed very late tonight to tell you his story. we really don't know who was involved and how with what was going on in ukraine. and a lot of what we've been told may not be 100% true. trump donor robert hyde. next. get in fred! even if it means being the back half of a unicorn. fear not fred! the front half washed his shirt with gain detergent. that's the scent that puts the giddy in giddy up! ahhh. the irresistible scent of gain. for a scent with even more giddy up, try gain scent blast in detergent, fabric softener and scent beads.

ahoy! gotcha! nooooo... noooooo... quick, the quicker picker upper! bounty picks up messes quicker and is 2x more absorbent. bounty, the quicker picker upper.

can be a sign your feeling digestive systemhed down isn't working at its best. taking metamucil every day can help. its psyllium fiber forms a gel that traps and removes the waste that weighs you down. it also helps lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption,

promoting healthy blood sugar levels. so, start feeling lighter and more energetic by taking metamucil every day. take the metamucil two-week challenge, lighten up. just take metamucil every day for two weeks. available at your local retailer.

all right. the debate over evidence includes text messages from lev parnas. this is something that the democrats want in. that is not the case at this point. why? well, because they're a window into what was going on in ukraine and what we know and maybe just as importantly what we don't know. for instance, one of the texts is a set of dialogue. it's not one text. it's a whole thread of texts. with a man named robert hyde. all right? he joins us now on "prime time." you waited a long time. thank you very much for doing so. i appreciate that. >> yes, sir. >> and again, the fight's over witnesses and do we really need to know anything more than we do right now. and as you know, i believe you speak very loudly to this point. you have come up here as being in dialogue with lev parnas. you know lev parnas. >> a little bit. >> okay. and how was it that you came to be in these contacts with him about what may or may not have been going on in ukraine?

>> passing off each other's phone numbers. so when you program it, whatsapp automatically connects you. so you're immediately tied to each other once you, you know, upload the contact. >> so you had lev parnas. but the decision to start being involved with him about what was going on with the then u.s. ambassador to ukraine, how did that happen? >> well, first off i'd like to say brought you a gift. a hyde for congress foam pop-up. >> appreciate it. >> i brought a blue one for you. >> i like it. >> absolutely. number two, this is my third interview ever, first time live on tv. i just want the public to know that. i just brought notes because -- >> take your notes. >> if you notice, i'm not sweating like lev. i've been here all night. you called me last night when i was in bed. i agreed to it this morning. >> appreciate it. >> i apologize to eric bolling, my man. i was supposed to do him first. hopefully he lets me back on someday. i brought notes from the crown plaza, not the ritz like lev. you guys put me in the crown.

so i just made these notes pretty much in the bathroom. but i want to thank you and cnn for this opportunity. i want to thank president trump and the u.s. military for providing us the blanket of freedom to do this show. i want to congratulate derek jeter that was here -- >> hall of fame. >> absolutely. >> but hold on -- >> i'm almost finished. just please let me -- and i'll try to do my best for you. >> appreciate it. >> absolutely. i want to thank nis sxn bonnie. absolutely. phenomenal, by the way. trace apparel for making me look good. >> mr. hyde -- >> hold on, i'm almost done. and honestly i would like to apologize on behalf of republicans to myself for the name calling that happened with you and your daughter at that bar with that guy that -- >> don't worry about it. >> so i would like to say that i never have called you those names. i don't see it in you. and i'd like to apologize. >> hey, listen, you've got

nothing to apologize for. just tell the truth right now and we'll be good. help us understand some things. >> sure. >> so lev parnas, how do you wind up in this dialogue about passing messages from this belgian guy named decalumway or -- >> decalui. >> how did you get hooked up with that? >> it's a small world when you donate and you're invited or they invite you with groups of people on certain dates and spread them through the month. met him -- not really positive how i met him but you meet a lot of people and back then it was a big social scene, a lot of drinking. and -- and i would like to apologize to my fellow republicans if i'm a distraction right now but this is a hoax. it's a complete joke. >> what's a hoax? >> the impeachment. it's a giant circus. where's the bribery? where's the treason? have you read the transcripts -- >> forget about the legal case because i want you as a fact witness. let them fight it out. that's what they're doing. these are your whatsapp messages

to parnas. okay? you don't dispute that. >> yeah. >> but you say you were passing them on from this belgian guy, that he was sending them to you and you were sending them to parnas. is that accurate? >> that's accurate. but let me just take a step backwards to what you said. i acknowledge that some of them are my whatsapp messages. but like i said in the video i self-made on friday when this all -- the world was hitting the fan was i asked -- because honestly i don't have the message -- i'll show you my phone. i don't have the messages. i'll show you, there's one from lev about an article from giuliani going to ukraine and i responded like three weeks later. i believe he didn't go. i heard he canceled it. >> got you. i saw that. >> on friday i came out with a video and i was like, adam, produce the rest of the contacts. where's the whatsapp messages? >> but you were sending these messages that we have -- >> listen, i have no clue because i don't have the messages. >> right. but we have copies of them where

they go from the belgian guy -- >> anthony. >> right. and he's sending you this message and that is the same message in substance you that then send to parnas. do you think this guy, this belgian guy, was having surveillance done on the ambassador? >> no. absolutely not. this guy's a complete tool. okay? >> where did he get this information? we don't have a lot of time. >> here's what i'm doing. ready? how much time do we have? >> not long. >> so parnas is a con artist. he screws friends of my families for members of my family. he had professional athletes invest millions of dollars and he brought this company, wiped it out -- >> but that's about -- i'm talking about these messages. >> i'm painting a picture of lev. lev's a con man. a complete -- i believe he's 65 years old. about who knows, 10, 20, 15 years ago he's made a deal with the feds.

so i think this whole thing is a conspiracy with the feds -- >> that's speculation, though. you've got to -- >> it's not speculation. >> it's speculation because we don't know it for a fact. >> the feds are spying on everybody. and if i was apple i would not give them the back door to apple phones. >> listen, we want to respect the institutions. even the president says that. just help me understand this one thing before i let you go. >> so you're find with them linking -- >> no, i'm not fine with any institution not doing its duty the right way. that's why the media's supposed to police them. so is congress. >> would you be fine with apple giving a back door to go to your phone? >> but i don't want to put -- >> i'm trying to panltd a picture of lev. he's working for the feds and he's trying to set people up. and the administration to impeach the president. >> but you sent -- >> it's a circus. it's a fake. >> but here's the thing. robert. he's being investigated. he's been indicted. this is all i want you to tell me about. this is all. it's not about your conclusions. it's just the facts. why were you sending these messages to lev from this other guy? >> to be totally honest i

thought i was joking -- i can't even answer you accurately because i don't have the messages. i was traveling. i was in ireland. i was -- i spent 34 days on the road in south america, came home for half a day, flew out to ireland for a week -- >> right. but why pass along messages where they were supposedly surveilling -- >> i believe this guy pretending i'm cia, i do -- hey, i need you to pass this to lev parnas. and i was like -- you know, it was like 3:00 in the morning somewhere in the world. who cares? copy and paste. i mean, everything i did is copy paste. you can see it. >> i do see patterns of copying and pasting going from this guy to parnas. >> i think both these guys work for the feds. they're scumbags and they try to make me look like i'm this guy. and i -- >> so you don't know whether or not -- >> the feds and what they did -- >> hold on a second. you don't know whether or not this guy is actually part of any surveillance that was going on? >> this guy? joke of a -- joke of the millennium. >> but why hand over the messages, then? why pass them along? >> because honestly i thought they were friends.

they portrayed themselves as knowing each other. and i just -- honestly, if you're in a small group and you don't want to see these people out at bars, out at -- or the social scenes we were in because they're like 20, 30, 40 -- >> i get you. but then they could have done it with each other other. they didn't need you. why did they need you? >> that's a great question. but you don't know -- i don't know. honestly i can't really answer that. >> i want tofd people here -- >> but notice how i don't have my lawyer. >> i don't think you need one because in a situation like this i'm just asking you some questions about facts and i appreciate you giving me the information. >> can we have a few more minutes? >> no. i've got to go. i've got to go to break. >> let's -- we've got like -- largest tax cuts -- >> i'll talk to you after. this is about the impeachment. he'll make the case -- >> but where's the bribery? where's the treason? >> that's a case for the senators to make. >> read the transcript. >> i'll talk to you in a minute. >> black and white. like michael jackson. >> let me take a break right now. we'll talk to where we think

this case goes forward next. stay with us. [♪] are you currently using a whitening toothpaste, but not seeing results? try crest 3d whitestrips. its enamel-safe formula lifts and removes stains to provide 100% noticeably whiter teeth or your money back. try crest 3d whitestrips.

what's going on? it's the 3pm slump. should have had a p3. oh yeah. should have had a p3. need energy? get p3. with a mix of meat, cheese and nuts.

were cooking with mom. she always said, "food is love," so when she moved in with us, a new kitchen became part of our financial plan. ♪ i want to make the most of every meal we have together. ♪ at northwestern mutual, our version of financial planning helps you live your dreams today. find a northwestern mutual advisor at nm dot com. rowithout the commission fees yoand account minimums. so, you can start investing wherever you are - even on the bus. download now and get your first stock on us.

robinhood. on iphone 11 that will have youh seeing double. right now, switch to t-mobile and get 2 lines of unlimited for only $90 and 2 iphone 11s on us. all on t-mobile's newest, most powerful signal that goes farther than ever before. get twice the deal, 2 lines of unlimited for $90 and 2 iphone 11s on us. ♪ only at t-mobile. ...depend® silhouette™ briefs feature maximum absorbency, with trusted protection for all out confidence... beautiful colors and an improved fit for a sleek design and personal style. life's better when you're in it. be there with depend®. because the tempur-breeze™makes stransfers heat. away from your body. so you feel cool, night after night. and now tempur-pedic is ranked number one by jd power in customer satisfaction with retail mattresses.

all right. joining us now is michael zeldin and garrett graff. and fellas, hear me out on this. you want to know the argument for witnesses. right? why do we need to know more? don't we know enough already? that's the argument from the president's defenders. michael zeldin, counselor, i present to you the last guest

that we just had as exhibit a of how you need to have the people who were in control of these different institutions and these different scenarios come on and explain how someone like a lev parnas, someone like a robert hyde, someone like this mr. de caluwe get close enough to the president's main agent and their manipulations of a sovereign government >> if this were a real trial, somebody like parnas would be a suspected witness. whether mewhether he's credibles another matter. we know the ambassador was removed from the country on the indication there was an imminent

threat to her. so, this guy is just like oh, well, this is just a joke a cut and paste. well, he's cutting and pasting threatening emails about a sitting u.s. ambassador who the state department felt so concerned about, they had to yank her out of the country with almost no notice. >> just so you understand also, this isn't like someone we just dug up. lev parnas has been talk bougt this guy. the fbi, it is our understanding, went and talked to him recently about this because the story makes no sense. i actually find him credible on his lack of understanding and why he did and why he did it. this isn't i don't like the ambassador. let's say mean things because we like trump. this is specific about where she is and what's going on at a time

lev parnas is trying to manipulate the situation to get rid of her. we don't know who this belgium dpie is. how can someone like this get this close the president's circle. he's not a nobody when it comes to rudy giuliani and his efforts. >> and we have actually never got a good explanation or got the bottom of what caused ambassador yovanovitch to be pulled so abruptly from ukraine. she has never even got a good explanation of what got her pulled, other than a threat to her security. >> and one more piece of imperfection from the perfect call with zelensky, by the way. zelensky thanks president trump for being the first to tell him that yovanovitch was not good ambassador.

the president of ukraine thank the united states president for telling him, the first to do so, according to the summary, that the united states ambassador is bad. and the president says she's going to go through some things. we don't know what. we don't know what the motivation was. we don't know who these people are being used by his agent. rudy giuliani is waving around a letter. >> and i think you are seeing -- you mentioned the fibi agents questioning hyde. one of the things curious about that investigation is those texts have apparently been with the justice department for the first time and only recently handed off to the house intelligence committee and what is causing the fibi to be on th

back burner. >> the criticism is hey, in the house, you wanted these people, you can have them. they didn't know about parnas the way they do now. he wasn't available. this is a basic new perspective on this, is it not? >> exactly right. and this is why schumer moved for an article of amendments that would allow them to get state department documents. they don't know what are in these documents. so, they can't formulate what witnesses they want to kaucall this is the heart of the problem of what we'll see in the next three days. which is witnesses missing, arguments made on the basis of partial information and a vote, probably to end this thing with no understanding of what happened. >> so people will say the gang

that can't shoot straight. and if they want to talk about clinton, there was a crazy cast of characters. and ken starr had access to all of them. he interviewed everybody. and that's why the fight for witnesses was different because they had everybody on record already. and thence bes were people already in the record. i'm telling you robert hyde is not someone to put a lot of faith or trust into. but that's exactly the point. how did he get involved? who is this guy sending messages about suranveillance? thank you for joining us for this impeachment edition of

"cuomo prime time." baez

most people think of verizon as a reliable phone company. but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. (second man) virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. (second woman) we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all of the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. (mom vo) we got a subaru to give him some ato reconnect and be together. and once we did that, we realized his greatest adventure is just beginning. (vo) welcome to the most adventurous outback ever.

the all-new subaru outback. go where love takes you. coyou fifteen percentico or more on car insurance? do woodchucks chuck wood? hey you dang woodchucks, quit chucking my wood! geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

hello to our viewers here in the united states and around the world. >> and i'm rosemary church from our world headquarters in atlanta, this is "cnn newsroom. ". ♪ well, on the first day of the u.s. president's impeachment trial, putting forlgt a dozen amendments. republicans republicans refusing to give