appreciate it. >> thank you. >> that was the first time since the trial ended that the house managers got together to discuss their prosecution of the case against president trump. that's it for us. thanks for watching. hello, everybody. i'm chris cuomo. welcome to primetime. we have breaking news on our watch. fears are being realized tonight. a modern-day friday night massacre by donald trump. he's taking out his opponents, as promised. now, you're going to hear from his side. how do they justify what this president is doing? can they offer a defense? we have two gop impeachment players here. plus, a warning for republicans who think that they are in the clear. this revenge has just begun. so let's get after it. the president told you that when he had a chance, he would go after everybody he felt was

against him. and that doesn't mean enemies. that means people who were telling the truth. people who had the faith in this country to stand up and take a stand. now, they're going down, one by one. gordon sondland. remember him? everyone was in the loop. a big donor to trump. a personal friend. out. he was a big witness in the trump impeachment trial. he announced it himself in a statement tonight. this is what he said. i was advised today that the president intends to recall me effectively -- effective immediately as united states ambassador to the european union. one of his main donors, a friend of his, he didn't even talk to him directly. it comes after another star impeachment witness was apparently escorted out of the white house. you remember him. lieutenant colonel alexander vindman. the top ukraine expert at the national security council. he's been reassigned, along with his brother, who also worked at the nsc. it's like a drug cartel netflix series. we're not just coming for you.

we're coming for your family. the brother goes, too? both lieutenant colonel vindman and sondland testified against the president under subpoena. that's why they're gone. now, you'll hear arguments tonight. the president has the right. the president has the right. this is not about having the right. it's about doing what is right. vindman's lawyer now says the truth cost him his job. and the president wasn't putting on any poker face about this earlier. >> well, i'm not happy with him. you think i'm supposed to be happy with him? i'm not. >> no but he's supposed to take retribution on anybody who speaks the truth against him. nobody proved that any of these people lied about the president. it's the truth he is punishing. a trump advisor describes the moves as necessary to send a message inside the administration that siding against the president won't be tolerated. flushing out the pipes, they

said. let's bring in the power players for this one. vaughn brownstein, david gurgen. david, the friday night massacre. familiar phrase. you heard it from one of the president's advisors. we can't have people in here who are not on the president's side. what's the implication? >> well, chris, i must say i agree to an extent about that. to keep vindman in place would have been very, very awkward. everybody knows that. vindman himself understood that. as in so many things with trump, it's not what he does sometimes. it's how he does it. and i do think there is a classy way to do something like this. and then there's become the trump way. the classy way would have been call vindman in. say, son, listen, i understood you felt you had to go because of the subpoena. i understand you told the truth as you -- as you knew it. but we just can't operate with somebody. it's going to be too awkward for you and we're going to reassign

you. that would have been a classy way. then there is the trump way. it's brutal. it's -- it's heartless. it's bullying. all the things that -- and i especially wonder, chris, after the president's come off one of the best weeks of his presidency, why he would do something to step on that and to show the other side of who donald trump is and remind us of his dark side. >> well, david, you know, let me pause it and answer. because this is who he is and this is what he values. sam vin ger et, i take gurgan's point by definition. but there is a message here, sam, you worked in that part of the world in government. and the idea that, hey, i don't like that you said things about me that were true but i don't like them. and i am getting rid of everybody around you who did the same thing. and by the way, i'm getting rid of your sister, too. who works in a completely different department. is that just about, well, we all have to be on the same page? or is that a different kind of chilling effect? >> this isn't just about the

president having the right to surround himself with people who are on the same page. the president is doing this solely because he can. he can't be criminally indicted. he's not going to be impeached. and he is sending a clear message to lieutenant colonel vindman and to every single other u.s. government employee about the risks associated with actually doing their jobs. remember, when you are at the nsc, it is your job to uphold the rule of law. it is your job to report wrongdoing to nsc lawyers. that is exactly what lieutenant colonel vindman did. and by firing the vindmans, by treating them like criminals, having them escorted off of white house grounds with security. a decorated war hero. the president is signaling that the cost of speaking truth, through legally protected channels, are not just physical threats, not just public smearing. they're also professional retribution. and, chris, i am deeply concerned about the effect that this is going to have on accountability for the president going forward because it's clear

that if you do speak up, you're going to run all these risks. including, in this case, losing your job. >> right. it's not like they came out and said we're biden guys. they told the truth about what they were subpoenaed to talk about. now, ron, there is another layer of implication here. we know who this president is. he told you this is what he wanted to do. hell, his son is jumping up and down bragging about that this is what they wanted to do. but this is also on the senators, who believed that they could acquit this president. they could not vote for witnesses. and that he'd get the message. listen to senator collins, someone i'm sure we all respect and have dealt with a lot. >> i, obviously, am not in favor of any kind of retribution against anyone who came forward with evidence. >> all right. she's not in favor of retribution. but, ron, isn't that a little bit like saying, look, i'm going to let the tiger out of the cage. but i really hope that it doesn't go after any of these

sheep that are sitting right in front of it. >> yeah. it's hard to look more ineffectual than susan collins has during this entire process. she was the one who said only a few days ago i think the president has learned a pretty big lesson from impeachment. turned out, she was right but not the lesson she thought. what he learned was that republicans in congress simply will not sanction or constrain him almost no matter what he does. you know, i like to say every time he breaks a window, the republicans sweep up the glass in congress. and the lesson that he takes from that is that he can constantly push further. and i think the clear message of today -- first of all, i am in the rare position of disagreeing with david because i think the brutality with trump is the point. and as sam said, it's designed to be so brutal. precisely to send a message to others in the government. the message it sends to republicans in congress is as long as they defend this kind of behavior -- marco rubio put out a tweet tonight defending the president's actions. as long as they defend it, they

are going to get more of it and it's going to get more extreme over time as he becomes more convinced he cannot be held accountable in any meaningful way. >> just to remind you how these republicans are literally twisting themselves up. marco rubio said even though the president did things that are impeachable, i'm not going to remove him because i don't know that it's the best thing in the world. he's been silent all along, david, and i understand your point and i take it. about wanting people around you where the working relationship is fluid. the matters that these people deal with affect national security, key foreign policy interest. no question about it. but this wasn't a policy disagreement. this was about fealty. if you look at the tweet from his son, no disrespect to done trump jr. i know he wants to protect his father. this is about a window to motivation. okay. allow me a moment to think and this may be a bit of a surprise but adam schiff, were it not for his crack investigation skills,

donald trump might have had a tougher time unearthing who needed to be fired. now, again, i give donald trump jr. a pass, man. i know what it's like to want to protect family in politics. but this is the mindset. it's not about policy, david. he is using the word fired. the white house is saying they weren't fired. you know, we'll take the white house word that they weren't fired. but this was retribution. this wasn't policy dispute. >> it absolutely was. and listen. what we understand from vindman's lawyers, he was marched out of the white house. that's what you do to humiliate somebody. and that's why i think this is crass and, you know, it's just -- it's beneath the dignity of the president. and it does, by the way, go back to something that adam schiff -- remember he was quoting cbs and people were -- had been -- vote against the president, your head's going to be on a pike. there are two heads on pike tonight. >> yep. and if anybody thinks this is where it ends, they're kidding themselves.

and if they don't think that the standards is going to change and that the president is going to get more sensitive about what he decide to punish, there's nothing holding him back. they don't get it but they will. the expression, you will rue the day has never mattered as much in modern politics as tonight. ron, sam, david, thank you for your perspectives on this. all right. now, any of those in quotes disappointed republicans in congress, don't be disappointed. you green lit this. you asked for this. you told the president it's okay to do this. you just didn't understand what he's capable of. but you're starting to learn and we'll show you the road forward next. where ore-ida golden crinkles are your crispy currency to pay for bites of this... ...with this. when kids won't eat dinner, potato pay them to. ore-ida. win at mealtime. can be a sign your feeling digestive systemhed down

isn't working at its best. taking metamucil every day can help. its psyllium fiber forms a gel that traps and removes the waste that weighs you down. it also helps lower cholesterol and slows sugar absorption, promoting healthy blood sugar levels. so, start feeling lighter and more energetic by taking metamucil every day. take the metamucil two-week challenge, lighten up. just take metamucil every day for two weeks. available at your local retailer. rouge signature by l'oreal.

finally a lasting lip stain. for a matte color impact, with a barely there feel. luxuriously intense matte shades. rouge signature by l'oreal paris. we're worth it. rouge signature by l'oreal paris. sleep this amazing? that's a zzzquil pure zzzs sleep. our liquid has a unique botanical blend, while an optimal melatonin level means no next-day grogginess. zzzquil pure zzzs. naturally superior sleep.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ wherever we want to go, we just have to start. autosave your way there with chase. chase. make more of what's yours.

wheyou want relief... fast. only thermacare ultra pain relieving cream has 4 active ingredients to fight pain 4 different ways. get powerful relief today, with thermacare. a lot of republicans brushed aside the warning that if acquitted, this president would be very emboldened. >> i believe that the president has learned from this case. >> i think there are lessons that can -- everybody can learn from it. >> i think the message has been delivered. >> look. we argued that people would rue the day that they told donald trump that he has nothing to fear except following his own instincts. none of the firings or removals or the reorganization, whatever you want to call it, none of this is random. none of this is about switching

talent. and, frankly, this is not about whether the president has the right to do it. the answer is, yes, he does. but it's whether it's right or wrong that he's doing it. sondland was his guy. the million-dollar donor. his friend, who he gifted the eu ambassadorship. he said just enough to keep himself out of jail but obviously too much for this president to let him keep his post. but he didn't even talk to him directly. ltc alexander vindman answered a lawful subpoena. told the truth. nobody says otherwise. and for that, a decorated u.s. soldier was escorted out of the white house like some kind of security threat. and, by the way, just like some netflix drug cartel that you'd binge on, they got out his brother, too. he didn't even have anything to do with this. he was just another government worker. the truth is he's gone after every person who told the truth. the president does not seem to care how much you bled for the country, what your record of

service is, or what you even paid for the position that he gave you. if you cross him, you're out. as he so often does, donald trump stood in the east room of the white house, and he told you what he was going to do. >> dirty cops. bad people. it was the top scum and the fbi leakers and liars. democrats are lousy politicians. i'm sorry about mitt romney. the media and, you know, the other side. >> anybody who does not side with this president is seen as an enemy. there are no good-faith disagreements. know that. this is just the beginning. vindman. sondland. it's not the end. there are half dozen key witnesses who testified before the house. they are no longer in a position to speak truth to power. and that's what they were punished for. our attorney general. what has he just done? he shut down any chance that the

fbi or doj can dig into the president's campaign. an order handed down the same day the senate voted against removal. specifically, making off limits any case involving illegal contributions, donations, or payments by foreign nationals to a campaign. got to go through him. don't even try it unless i say it's okay. now, lest you think this is about reform, the rules may end after the election in november. those on the outside, like john bolton, looking to profit from his perspective, the white house is threatening to block the release of his book. the house of representatives, left with worthless subpoena power. journalists. now what? now what happens? they send us documents with black bars and redactions. we're making calls. we're trying to do foia requests. we're trying to get information. they're doing what they can to

keep information from you. members of his own party. when he did all this, they said nothing. they didn't even say anything when they went after romney. you know why? what they wanted was praise. >> mitch mcconnell, i want to tell you. you did a fantastic job. they love jim jordan and we love you, too. doug collins, where is he? where is doug? you have been so great. matt gaetz. thank you, matt. thank you. great job. >> mitt romney was the gop's choice to be president of the united states. they said nothing. as he was attacked by this president for doing an act of conscience as the president mocked him following his faith. saying religion is a crutch, as if that were a bad thing for someone who is a member of faith. now, the election is coming. between now and that point, you don't think he is going to go after any other republican who's not pure enough for him? who doesn't do enough for him?

who isn't there when he wants them to? you think there's anything keeping him in check of any kind of presidential decorum? here's the irony. you know the old expression, when they came for this group, i was silent. when they came for this group, i was silent. then when they came for me, there was no one to stand up. you know who will stand up for these republicans because they're not doing it for one another? we will. the media will hold power to account for what they do to use and abuse their power. whether it's against the opposing party or their own because fairness is for both sides. but remember, we told you, you would rue the day. so let's take this to one of the big impeachment players. what is another way to look at what's happening right now? how should we understand what comes next? and what we should expect from the president of the united states. break guests right after this. s who developed it. align naturally helps to soothe your occasional digestive upsets 24/7. so where you go the pro goes.

go with align, the pros in digestive health. i have moderate to severe pnow, there's skyrizi. ♪ things are getting clearer, yeah i feel free ♪ ♪ to bare my skin ♪ yeah that's all me. ♪ nothing and me go hand in hand ♪ ♪ nothing on my skin ♪ that's my new plan. ♪ nothing is everything. keep your skin clearer with skyrizi. 3 out of 4 people achieved 90% clearer skin at 4 months. of those, nearly 9 out of 10 sustained it through 1 year. and skyrizi is 4 doses a year, after 2 starter doses. ♪ i see nothing in a different way ♪ ♪ and it's my moment so i just gotta say ♪ ♪ nothing is everything skyrizi may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. before treatment your doctor should check you for infections and tuberculosis. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms such as fevers, sweats, chills, muscle aches or coughs, or if you plan to or recently received a vaccine. ♪ nothing is everything ask your dermatologist about skyrizi.

♪ due to inclement weather... all two-wheel drive cross-overs should close for the day. wannabe suvs should close for the day. regular four door sedans should close for the foreseeable future. all jeep 4x4 vehicles will remain open- despite the harsh weather conditions. ♪ i appreciate what makes each person unique. that's why i like liberty mutual. they get that no two people are alike and customize your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. almost done. what do you think? i don't see it. only pay for what you need.

♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

when you're going to go up against a legal mind like robert ray, you got to make sure where you are coming at from is very clear. i stipulate, for the purpose of this discussion, the president can absolutely remove an ambassador. he can remove anybody who works at the pleasure of the president. it's his call. especially, when it comes to matters of national security council. we wouldn't want it any other way. it's not about whether he can do it. whether he has the right. it's about whether he has done something that is right. whether or not exacting revenge for telling the truth sends a message that we should not want our president to send. all right. so a member of the president's impeachment defense team is here. robert ray. friend of show. good to see you, sir. >> nice to be with you, as always, chris. >> so, again, i know we can do it. >> sure. >> i know he can do these things and i know there's an argument to be made. >> but be careful about the revenge stuff, though, too. look. trying to be as neutral as i possibly can through something like this, after all that we

have been through, it really strikes me as a situation where it's in everybody's interest to move on with somebody new. and, you know, i get the fact that everybody wants to read into this. well, you know, he has the power to remove ambassador sondland but he shouldn't do it because it looks like revenge. it's time to move on and a fresh start. and with regard to lieutenant colonel vindman, nobody is terminating his military career. he's effectively being relieved and he's going to go on, as i understand it, this summer to go on to the army college. so -- you know, i'm sure he will go on to a successful military career. it's just not going to be as part of the national security staff. and that's because the president has the right to decide who serves him, you know, and particularly who serve close to him. >> and his brother? >> well, same deal. you know, is it -- is it really in anybody's interest under the circumstances to have the both of them there? or either one of them there?

i -- you know, i just -- before we jump on the revenge bandwagon, it just seems to me it's sort of time for everybody to move on. and it can't be moved on from unless there are fresh faces. that's all i'll say. >> okay. fine. but now, let's unpack that. first, the reason it can't be done, at least in part, is because of who we're dealing with here. if it were you, maybe it could be done. i know you well enough to know you wouldn't remove vindman's brother. okay? he will. this president. why? because revenge is right in his wheelhouse of motivations. so i accept your argument about points of clarity and fresh starts. but that's not what this is about. he said he would do this. he said why he was doing it. and that is why he's doing it. and the only problem with it, robert, is he's punishing people for telling the truth. none of them have been cited for telling a lie. sondland was a little all over the place, but nobody cited him for intentional mendacity to hurt the president. what message does that send? you tell the truth about me, you're out. you like that message? >> yeah. but, again, jumping on the

reven revenge bandwagon, it just is another way of saying, well, we're going after these people for -- >> telling the truth. >> -- improper reasons or witness witnesses against me. i think could we try to just, for once, keep things simple and recognize that we have been through a lot. the country has been through a lot. and it's time to move on from this. and one of the ways to do that, for everybody's interest, not just the president but also the people who work there, there are those who are, you know, intimately connected to this. and i don't think it would be unusual to expect that people would have to move on as a result of that. it's not in anybody's interest that they remain. >> but what is the interest in punishing people who told the truth? they weren't out to get this president and they got caught doing it. >> you know, when -- when someone ends their service to the president, that's not a punishment. it's a privilege. you're making it sound as if the vindmans have a right to be

there. no, they do not. >> and you're making it sound like it doesn't matter why he removes them. >> well, we just went through an impeachment where an awful lot of what was happening with democrats' position with regard to impeachment revolved around what they thought the president's motivations were. and i have news for you and i think the american people have news for the democrats. you know, we don't impeach presidents for motivations. and a lot of what i read, for example, in the democrats' papers that led up to impeachment, was an awful lot akin to they don't like the fact that president trump engages, in their words, an abhorrent behavior. >> they don't like that he bribes a foreign power. you and i have had that discussion before. we don't have to re-litigate it tonight. >> and that didn't happen. it not only didn't happen, it wasn't even alleged. >> i'll give you that. they subtly alleged it in the first act. i feel they should have come out with it as bribery just because that's what they were really saying. >> there is no such thing -- as

close enough is good enough. >> i'm not arguing that point with you. i think that he attempted to bribe. i think it was there. whether or not it was worthy of removal, i think is a fair argument that i would have been happy to see. as long as there were witnesses. >> if it was so compelling, it would have been alleged. it was not alleged because they couldn't prove it. >> i don't know why they didn't do it. that's not what they say, by the way. but i don't want to go back to that. i want to stay because i think the enduring problem is what we are experiencing right now. okay? >> okay. >> and it's not just they don't like -- >> and i'm interested in enduring problems and i am interested in the fact that i do hope, out of all of this, like president ford once said, that, you know, there is a time and a place now for healing to begin. i would like to see -- >> he's doing no healing. >> on a -- >> he's doing no healing. no. he is one president, robert ray, you know that. what did clinton do? >> there are two parties involved here. >> what did clinton do after what you guys did, and you sprnlly saying i want to keep investigating him, right? like there's not as much

probable cause here to keep investigating as you had with clinton. he went to the prayer breakfast. he said, look, we got to move past this. this guy's firing people. >> my task following the impeachment was to investigate and commission a grand jury in connection with an investigation that established that crimes were committed and what to do about them. and whether to charge them once he left office. that's a significantly different situation, as i tried to explain on the floor of the senate, than what we had here. >> but there were no crimes established until the last day and you were talking about lying in a civil suit about a consensual twist. here, you talk about a bribing a foreign power. >> you weren't talking only about that. you were also talking about lying before a federal grand jury, which was significant. and efforts to obstruct justice. >> we don't know if you ever had anything like that here because he wouldn't testify. >> well, you know, we do know what we have with regard to that. an effort by democrats to come up with an impeachment article that alleged obstruction of congress. and they didn't let the process play out, which is what you do

when there is a dispute between two branches. >> and document is denied, robert, you don't see that as a pattern of obstruction? >> no, i don't. and i don't know the right answer with regard to that. what i do know is the only way to get an answer on a final decision is to go to a court and get one. and until you have that, i, for the life of me, still don't understand how anybody reasonably could have supported article ii as -- as sufficiently -- >> all i have been saying is this. >> even mitt romney, by the way, couldn't -- >> i know. he voted no on article ii. he also got savaged by this president for his vote and no republican stood up for him. and i tell you i thought it was weird when you disappeared after the first day. i thought you were very cogent. i thought you would have done very well answering the questions that came up. you don't have to say anything. you were the only person on the defense team that said anything

other than everything was perfect and all of a sudden, you were gone. it's the way it works. >> i actually had personal reasons. >> you don't have to talk about that. >> my wife had a baby on tuesday, which is one of the reasons that i wasn't there. but i was there for the verdict, which came in. >> first of all, you didn't even tell me that. that matters more to me than anything else we're talking about. god bless you and the baby. what i am saying is this, this is who he is. we're going to see more of this and it's going to be interesting to see how people defend it going forward because it's not the end. you're going to see it what he does with us. you are going to see it what he does with your own party. but listen. let's end bon a good note. god bless you and the family. >> thank you very much and i look forward to coming back when we talk about these important issues going forward. i hope that's the message that everybody takes. >> you are always welcome hereme herement. always. >> thank you very much. >> take care. the president, again, he has a right not to like what speaker pelosi did. she ripped up a copy of his

speech. disrespectful. okay? disrespectful. maybe a breach of decorum, right? maybe an insult to tradition. but imagine the irony that somebody who thought this president was being unfairly looked at for bad behavior, that may be criminal, now thinks that nancy pelosi is a felon for ripping up a speech. that's an argument worth having. next. uhh, excuse me, is there a problem here? you're in a no parking zone. oh, i... i didn't know. you didn't see the sign? that... that wasn't there when i was here earlier. (whimper) really? you know, in italy, they let you park anywhere. have a good day, sir. with geico, the savings keep on going. just like this sequel. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance. (glass shattering) (frustrated yell) (car horn blast) (yelp)

does new garnier micellarlife out ofwater rose. with rose water and micelles that work like a magnet to gently cleanse and remove makeup and now, even hydrates skin. it's cleansing, reinvented. new water rose. by garnier, naturally. othroughout the country for the past twelve years, mr. michael bloomberg is here. vo: leadership in action. mayor bloomberg and president obama worked together in the fight for gun safety laws, to improve education, and to develop innovative ways to help teens gain the skills needed to find good jobs. obama: at a time when washington is divided in old ideological battles he shows us what can be achieved when we bring people together to seek pragmatic solutions. bloomberg: i'm mike bloomberg and i approve this message. (woman) no matter what business you are in, digital transformation never stops. verizon keeps business ready for what's next.

(man) we weave security into their business... (second man) virtualize their operations... (third man) and could even build ai into their customer experiences. we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. (woman) where machines could talk to each other and expertise could go anywhere. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation, verizon keeps business ready. ♪ because you get matched with a plan tailored to you! whether you're a dine outer, take outer, veggie person, definitely-not-just-veggie person, bread lover, or cheese lover... all you have to do is answer personal assessment questions and get scientifically matched with a proven weight loss plan. find out which new customized plan can make losing weight easier for you! the new program from ww. weight watchers reimagined. join today with the ww triple play! hurry, offer ends february 10th.

all right. let's bring in congressman mike johnson of the judiciary committee. it's good to see you, sir. >> hey, good to see you, chris. >> i want you to help me understand something on this friday night. i just talked to robert ray about what appears to be like a friday night massacre of the president firing and of course he has the right but is it right? what will come next? i got his take on that. i want your take on something that is a little bit more finite, which is one of the main complaints about impeachment from you and others on this show and elsewhere was, you know, look. they don't like what he did. that doesn't mean that they should call him a criminal, right?

okay. >> yeah. sure. that's right. >> you are now doing exactly that with nancy pelosi in almost absurd fashion. and you are a respected legal scholar. why would you even suggest that she broke a law by tearing up the president's speech, just because you didn't like it? aren't you doing exactly what you don't like? >> of course, not. no, i'm not calling nancy pelosi a felon. i am answering a big question that's out there. and you have to back up and understand how this came about. of course, the night of the state of the union address, everyone saw the antics of her ripping up the state of the union speech. she violated the rules of decorum of the house. she violated a long tradition of civility that the speaker has during the state of the union and all other times. but she also broke a federal law. i'm not making that up. it's not some sort of attack on her. charlie kirk, very astutely observed, that was a violation of the federal statute. >> carharlie kirk is no authori

about whether or not she broke the law. jonathan turley says it's a silly notion, mike. he says it's a silly notion and that's your boy. >> yeah. hey, listen, everybody's entitled to their opinion. what i did was put together a little simple legal memo to explain and answer a lot of the questions that were out there. i saw a bunch of liberal law professors the next day jump on charlie kirk and call it silly. it's not. i encourage every one of your viewers, google it right now. no, chris, they should. >> mike, of course they -- i'll tell you why it's silly. okay? and we both know this and then i want to get to the real point of why you're doing it. okay? this is not an official document. the whole point of the legislative history of the law, they should read that also because sometimes laws have legislative history. is that they didn't want people to destroy evidence. they didn't want people to destroy documents so they could reshape history. okay? these were handed out as a courtesy by the president.

she's not at the national archive. she doesn't even equate as an officer under the statute. and this is not the official document. you cannot find a single case where anything like this has ever been litigated and you know it. my question is why would you do this when it's just about political payback? >> chris, wait a minute. i've got to answer what you just said because everything you just said is absolutely wrong. >> really? >> and there is a lot of misinformation out there. there is. just give me a second. you didn't read the legal memo, obviously. >> nope. >> i sat down with the house clerk, sat down with the parliamentarian, yes, and it is the quintessential document when is public delivers a state of the union. this is over two centuries of tradition. the mechanics are very important. the president delivers two original signed copies. one to the speaker of the house, to be held in the possession of the house, the body. one to the president of the senate, which is the vice president. those are the copies that are archived for time and memoriam. that happens from that point is

the speaker then gives it to the house clerk. they put it in a safe in the house of representatives for two years until the end of that congress. at that point, then, it is submitted to the national archives and it goes in the big safe where all the original state of the uniyons delivered y every president are kept. why is that important? because under the statute, it's a violation of the law to willfully mutilate or destroy any public record delivered to a public officer of the united states. it's -- it's punishable by up to three years in prison. >> there is another copy that was put in the archives. >> officer of the house. >> not under this definition and you know it. but, look, i think -- >> your legal argument's wrong. your legal argument's wrong. >> that's why larry tried and jonathan turley have agreed on one thing in their life and it's that you are doing something that is at the center of a problem in our politics. it's not enough for you not to like something. somebody's got to be a criminal. you know, and you just complained about it for three years about this president. you don't want him observed. you don't want witnesses on things that people tell you is criminal activity. but this, as righteous

retribution, you must see prosecuted because she broke the law. >> that's not what it is, chris. >> what is it? >> look, that's not what it is and everybody -- everybody can go to social media. everybody can find this memo and see how it was worded. i'm not calling nancy pelosi a felon. >> what are you calling her if you say she broke the law? >> wait a minute. wait, chris. you might not look the answer but that's what the law is. now, why are we doing that? why is that important? why is it not hypocritical? okay. because what we did in defending the president is the rule, the procedure, the due process that's required by the constitution. that he was completely denied in the charade that was the impeachment proceeding in the house. you and i have talked about this. they did it 20 times faster than they did the clinton impeachment investigation. >> because they completely stymied on getting any witnesses. of course, you don't want to litigate that but you just had a trial in the senate where you had no witnesses. you are a legal scholar. you've never heard of a trial without witnesses. not one. you can't give me one example.

>> chris, you know that -- you know that impeachment -- you know that impeachment is a different animal. you know that the -- the precedent was that if the senate did not find a reason for witnesses and documents, didn't find a need, that's their prerogative. it's a political process. and a majority of the senate decided that. you -- the country has to live with that. that's what elections are about. that's what the political system is about. and that was the right result. the reason that we -- we -- >> the only impeachment trial in history without witnesses. >> oh, come on. chris, there's only been three in the whole history of the u.s. >> no, there have been lots of impeachment trials. it's the only impeachment trial -- other people have been impeached. there's been no trial without witnesses. look, mike, what you're doing is -- >> come on. >> if every time you -- mike, i let you make your case. in fact, i think even more than most would. what i am saying is this. if you don't like what somebody does, fine. if you want to say she breached decorum, fine.

i think that you got a decent argument there. okay? i've never seen anybody do anything like what she did to be honest. and turley puts that in there. she tore up tradition. she tore up decorum. but that statute doesn't fit and this is exactly what you didn't like about what happened with trump. it's not enough not to like what somebody does. >> you're wrong. you're wrong. >> if you think -- the house wouldn't even take up the question. >> i'm not suggesting nancy pelosi be arrested, chris. because they have the majority votes in the house to put the censure thing down. no, and i'm not suggesting that. you obviously didn't read the memo i circulated. >> i didn't have to read the memo. i read the law. i read the legislative history and i looked for when it's been applied. and there is not a fact pattern that is within a mile of this. >> that's such an important point. it's never been applied in this context because no speaker of the house has ever come close to doing anything like this. and the problem is that decorum we talk about, the civility we all long for, the rules that should be followed are important on both sides. okay? and we have to be --

>> i haven't mentioned the president snubbed shaking the hand of the speaker. is that in your memo? >> no, first of all, we don't know that that's what happened. i don't think he saw her hand extended like that. >> really? >> he didn't shake the vice president's hand either. >> he didn't extend his hand. and let me give you a little piece of anecdote here. >> he didn't shake the vice president's hand either. are you suggesting he snubbed the vice president? >> the vice president didn't extend his hand, mike. look, we're both lawyers. i could play this game with you all night. did the vice president extend his hand? no. did nancy pelosi extend her hand? >> i didn't see the tape. >> i have. he didn't extend his hand. nancy pelosi did and he didn't shake it. but that's not a breach of decorum, right? why? i wonder if it has something to do with who he is and what he is. all i say is this, the more you stick to political arguments and not legal arguments, the better. but i always tell you this as i always do, i know we disagree

but i'll always let you make the case and i always want you on the show so people can hear what you have to say. i promise you that. >> i appreciate it. i appreciate it. thank you. >> mike johnson, be well. i'll speak to you again. congressman, thank you. all right. the president has impeachment behind him. he has strong supporters. okay. politically, he's all set up. what's his biggest argument for why you should elect him? it's one thing. it's the economy. is he telling you the truth about it? we go into detail about what you must know before you believe anything. next. t-mobile has the first and only, nationwide 5g network. and with it, you can shape the future. we've invested 30 billion dollars and built our new 5g network for businesses like yours. while some 5g signals only go a few blocks, t-mobile 5g goes for miles. no other 5g signal goes farther or is more reliable in business. tomorrow is in your hands. partner with t-mobile for business today.

tomorrow is in your hands. you clean dishes as you cook, to save time and stay ahead of the mess. but scrubbing still takes time. now there's new dawn powerwash dish spray. the faster, easier way to clean as you go. it cleans grease five times faster. on easy messes, just spray, wipe, and rinse. on tough messes, the spray-activated suds cut through grease on contact, without water. just wipe, and rinse. get dishes done faster. new dawn powerwash dish spray. spray. wipe. rinse. ♪ applebee's new irresist-a-bowls now starting at $7.99. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood.

my teemotionally, socially. very sore spot for me, if i would've known that i was gonna be 50 times happier... i would've gone into aspen dental much sooner. it was a very life changing experience... and it felt like i was me again. that's when i realized i hadn't been for three years. at aspen dental we're all about yes. like yes to flexible hours and payment options. yes to free exam and x-rays for new patients without insurance. and yes whenever you're ready to get started, we are too.

call 1-800-aspendental today. hi. uh, can you tell me how to get to i-70, please? o-okay, are you -- ah, yes. thank you. switch to progressive and you can save hundreds. you know, like the sign says.

trump's best number is that 55% approve of how he's hands lg the economy. the key to the argument why people think that. i argue it's largely because of sound bites like the one i'm about to play that he pounds into your head repeatedly hoping it becomes reality. >> if we hadn't revertsed the

failed economic policy of the previous administration the world would not know be witnessing this great economic success. >> saying something a lot doesn't make it true. no more than the refrain of the a perfect ukraine call. wind up getting him impeached with bipartisan senators admitting actions were anything but perfect. so to the economy. the problem with the analysis you can make numbers look however yo like. that's a stat prove anything you want it to. trends don't lie. and the trends show that what this president has done to help the economy are moves that simply continued positive preexisting trends. and what he's done over all has been a known fact that he put the expansion in jeopardy. let's take jobs during his first 36 months in office economy

gained 6.6 million jobs. great. full stop. during the last 36 months of obama 8.1 million jobs added. 23% more than trump. the average monthly gain so far under trump. 182,000 jobs. last three years under obama. 224,000 jobs amonth. the labor department run by the wife of his man in the senate mitch mcconnell made some revisions to past data. reducing trumps gains by 350,000 jobs. his people did it. wasn't done by bad people. i guarantee it's not a stat you'll see on trumps twitter feed. remember it comes from secretary chow. mcconnell's wife. how about over all economic growth. last three years of obama 2.4%. trump 2.5%. and his first three years.

the same. why? continuation of a trend. and we get into the sneak ski stuff. trump tries to sell economic moous as being good for the worker more than the fat cats sfwl the economy is booming. wages are soaring. workers are thriving and america's future has never ever looked brighter. >> look at the trends. 3% annual growth for wages. seems like something to celebrate. or it's good. you have to factor in inflation. that's what the money wonks call real wages. it's just.8 of a% under trump. for obama's last three years it was 1.3%. they shouldn't be celebrating. especially trump. wages have gob up it doesn't mean much because you can't buy more with it. the wage wins becomes a whopper,

a lie. down the income scale. the federal minimum wage has been stuck at 7.25 for a deck cake. trump refused to do anything about it. and railed against 30 states who raised them on their own. the of coursive u.s. minimum wage is around $12 an hour. that's why wages are up for low income workers not because of trump. despite him. trump is getting credit for what came before him. let's look at what he has done. rolling back regulations. cutting taxes. who saw the benefit? not mom and pop. big corporations. his biggest impact on the economy has been the deficits brought by that cut. that was only permanent for the corporations. it's more than a trillion dollars. $400 billion more than when obama left office.

it will reach 1.7 trillion by 2030. so much for paying for itself. swallowing an unpaid tax cut was the first major surrender for the gop. they swallowed more since. noteingly the pride and sense of purpose this congress. trump supporters do not have to agree with the analysis. i'll tell you what, i bet whatever you want you can't disprove it. not with trends. economic data you can twist it more ways than a worm want trends don't lie. the best news for the economy has been the continued expansion over ten years in the making. here's the challenge. has what trump what he's done in office since entering has it made it more likely that this expansion continues or it ends? thank you for watching. "cnn tonight" with d. lemon is next. the only one to combine a safe sleep aid. and the 12-hour pain relieving strength of aleve. so...magic mornings happen.

there's a better choice. aleve pm. nefrom maybelline new york.ra the look of a lash lift without the salon hassle. double-curved lifting brush. long, lifted volume. ♪ new falsies lash lift mascara. only from maybelline new york. through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business. from finding out what's selling best... to managing your fleet... to collaborating remotely with your teams. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence. this one's for you. the heroes who won't let your disease hold you back. you inspired us to make your humira experience even better

with humira citrate-free. it has the same effectiveness you know and trust, but we removed the citrate buffers, there's less liquid, and a thinner needle, with less pain immediately following injection. if you haven't yet, talk to your doctor about humira citrate-free. and you can use your co-pay card to pay as little as $5 a month. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ask your doctor about humira citrate-free. the same humira you trust with less pain immediately following injection.

this is "cnn tonight." here's breaking news president trump em boldened by impeachment victory. firing two key witnesses. lieutenant vindman and ambassador sondland. the u.s. a million dollar trump donor recalled effective immediately after he reportedly resisted efforts to resign. vindman fired from his white house job and escorted out of by security. his twin brother lieutenant colonel a national security counsel attorney who did not testify was fired as well chl there's a lot to get to right now. the story on this she's been reporting. good evening to you. how did this go down? what's going on? >> it's a striking night. the white house is not putting forth pretenses to say it's not connected. they're not pushing back on