allowing this doctor to prey on so many patients over decades when they had indication from multiple sources that he was acting inappropriately. kate, columbia university told us it supports the victims and will cooperate with the d.a.'s investigation. >> thank you so much for your work on this, drew. really appreciate it. thank you all so much for joins us. "a.c. 360" starts right now. good evening. we begin with my conversation with former illinois governor rod blagojevich. president trump this week commuted his 14-year federal prison sentence. he was convicted of a string of charges including wire fraud, attempted extortion and conspiracy to solicit bribes. he was impeached by the illinois state legislature in 200 the and a year later declared his innocence on a believe appearance of "celebrity apprentice" hosted by donald trump. his commutation has been criticized by democrats and republicans in illinois familiar with his record. i spoke with the former democratic governor who now calls himself a trumpocrat a few

moments ago. governor blagojevich, there's obviously been criticism about the president's decision to commute your sentence. certainly within his power to do so. what interests me since you've been out and the statements you've made you've shown no remorse for the crimes you were convicted by a jury of and portraying yourself as a convict of persecution by prosecutors. just about everyone though that's looked at the evidence against you says that's just false. >> well, i don't think they've looked carefully because i am a political prisoner. i was put in prison for practicing -- >> wait a minute. you're a political prisoner. nelson mandela was a political prisoner. they have no undue process and unjustly jailed and you had appeals courts look at your sentencing and you even -- you even appealed to the supreme court twice and they refused to hear you. so you're hardly a political prisoner. >> well, first of all, nelson

mandela went before a court. he was convicted in a court of law. i had -- >> by a racist apartheid government. >> that's correct. >> and not a jury of his peers. >> but if you were to ask -- i bet if you were to ask nelson mandela whether he thought it was fair in the early '60s -- >> i just got to stop you. i'm sorry. as someone who worked in south africa and saw apartheid the idea that you are comparing yourself to somebody who has actually been railroaded by an apartheid system is just nuts and, frankly, like offensive. >> you're the one making the comparison, not me. i didn't bring up nelson mandela. you did. >> you're saying like him you were railroaded by a an all white jury for an oppressive regime. >> you're putting words in my mouth. i never said that either. there were -- the jury was -- had -- you know, some

representation from african-americans, though, what i'm saying is i was thrown in prison and spent nearly eight years in prison for practicing politics, for seeking campaign contributions without a quid pro quo. no express quid pro quo and i was given the same standards senator menendez was given. i could very well have been in the u.s. senate instead of where i was. now, i'm not complaining that i'm not in the senate but i am complaining that i was sent to prison by a handful of corrupt prosecutors who are abusing their power, they're uncontrolled and they're the ones that chief justice breyer talked about when he said that our country is in trouble because of these uncontrolled prosecutors who can do just about anything they want to do and are using their power to go after government officials for what he called routine practices. >> let me just ask you -- >> that's what i went to prison for. >> so you're saying it's corrupt prosecutors. do you know who the guy is who actually approved the wiretap,

the phone tap on you was? it was michael mukasey, the attorney general at the time. he's actually a trump supporter now and trump defender. he was a george bush appointee so the idea that's one of the corrupt prosecutor, the guy who actually tapped your phones and actually gathered all the evidence against you. >> no, i think he got -- he signed off on what the prosecutor -- >> he was fooled by prosecutors? >> i think that he was given some information and he agreed to do the wiretaps and then made -- had wiretaps that if they played all the tapes which they didn't do, they put a seal order on the tapes wouldn't allow me to play tapes in court, tape recordings they made that proved everything i'm saying is true about what they did to me, i think the result would have been very different. >> so but, okay, here's where your argument to me doesn't really hold up. you're saying it's these corrupt prosecutors who tricked the

jury, you know, who didn't -- >> they lied to the jury. they lied to the jury. >> okay. >> yes. >> you're the one who's been convicted of lying to the fbi, though, by that very same jury. but just hear me out here. what i don't understand is, let me just remind you, it wasn't just -- it wasn't -- it wasn't prosecutors who convicted you, found you guilty, it was actually a jury who found you guilty and that's our system. you also then were able to appeal and you appealed to the circuit court and twice i believe and they actually upheld your conviction. so other judge, a higher court, the u.s. 7th circuit looked at the evidence again and said it was overwhelming. that's a quote. they upheld your conviction then you twice had the opportunity to apply to the supreme court to hear your arguments and you know what, they refused because they said, your argument doesn't hold up. the very argument you are making right now was looked at by the 7th circuit, by the supreme

court, it was heard in the courtroom and no one bought it. the illinois senate unanimously voted to remove you. everyone in the illinois house also voted, democrats and republicans to impeach you except for one person, you know who that was? your sister-in-law. i mean, give me a break. >> okay, that -- i hear what you're saying but let me fill in some of the facts that you don't seem to have. first and foremost, when a prosecutor comes out and arrests a sitting governor with a s.w.a.t. team and announces a big lie, the sail of a senate seat which incidentally was reversed by the appellate court and ruled the discussions about the senate seat were routine politics. >> they still upheld your conviction, though. they upheld your conviction. >> they did not. they reversed those charges -- >> those charges -- you know what, you had like how many charges against you, 15, 16, yes, they threw out a couple of charges. there were still enough charges for a judge to then look at it

and say you know what, the sentence still stands but go ahead. >> let me ask do you know what the charges were that were upheld? do you know what they involved? they involved -- do you, anderson? i can tell you if you don't. >> i do but go ahead. >> requests for campaign contributions. >> extorting a children's hospital -- >> it's extortion if there's evidence of a quid pro quo, of an express quid pro quo. >> you know what, you -- come on. you're a smart guy. to extort somebody, to extort somebody you don't have to say, i am now extorting you. i am now going to threaten you. i am now going to promise you something, a quid for a pro. i mean, it doesn't work that way. >> it does work that way. the united states supreme court in 1991, the highest court in the land, anderson, established the rules for fund-raising and they said that routine political -- >> that was the argument you made in court that this was all routine fund-raising. >> it's only bribery or extortion -- it's only a crime

if there is an express quid pro quo, one thing for another. there was never evidence of that. they never proved that. they simply said that if there is a connection in the mind of somebody, that that then is the standard. >> but, sir, you know the jury -- >> i have to make this point. >> okay. >> the jury made the right call based upon the fake law that the prosecutors gave them. they -- they used a standard against me that the supreme court in the mccormick case said was not the law. think about that they used a standard the supreme court said was not the law. how different is that from using -- from a dirty cop planning a murder weapon to frame an innocent man? >> all of this sounds good on tv. >> it's all true. >> it all sounds good on tv. >> all true. >> but you know what, the jury actually looked at the evidence, actually you had two juries looking at evidence. you also have now had the 7th circuit court of appeals looking at the evidence and they said it was overwhelming against you. and they do know the law and on top of that the supreme court was looking at this great injustice that you're talking about and said, you know what, twice we're not going to look at

this because you know what, it should stand. >> can i answer that? >> yeah. >> the supreme court only takes 2% of the cases. it's very hard to get into the supreme court. now, with regard to the appellate court, shockingly disappointing that they would uphold an unlawful standard. i would simply say to your viewers and you take a look at the mccormick case. senator menendez was given the lawful standard and his case was ultimately thrown out by a judge. me, they used the standard the court said was not the law and that is basically a dirty cop planting a murder weapon to frame an innocent man and then you talk about the primacy of the supreme court, let me remind you in 1857 the best judge in america, chief justice tawny said that dred scott a black man was not entitled to the same rights as anybody else. and so they don't always get it right either. i've learned something in these eight years and that is we have a racist and corrupt criminal justice system in many areas.

>> right. >> this is why i hope one day maybe you'll join me in the fight to reform our criminal justice system and do something about the problem of oversentencing blacks and latinos. i learned that when i was there. >> well, what's sad is you hadn't actually learned that when you mattered. when you actually were the governor. you talk about working for the criminal justice reform. there's a lot of people in chicago and in illinois who actually like spit up when you say that because when you were actually in power and when you were actually governor and could have helped thousands of people with clemency cases you blew it off. the governor after you inherited a huge backlog, nearly 3,000 clemency petitions that you failed to review. in fact, you were sued by -- you were sued as governor by cabrini green legal aid to try to pressure you to actually pay attention to clemency cases instead of extorting people for money and campaign contributions. so it's a little ironic and frankly a little sad and pathetic and hypocritical. you talking about, you know,

commuting -- getting -- you get a commutation of a sentence which is within the president's right but you ignored a whole hell of a lot of other people who were hoping you would give them clemency when you actually mattered. so actually you know what, i'm happy -- it wasn't a question. it was a statement. i'd be happy to work with people on criminal justice reform but i wouldn't work with you. >> okay, can i answer that statement and question? >> yes. >> okay, i had's like to address that. look, when you've been put where i was and you have all the time that i was given to think and look back on some of the things you might have done different, that's certainly an area you talked about that i certainly wish i would have done more on. there's no question about that. >> fair enough. >> that's among my biggest regrets. i didn't know how corrupt the criminal justice system was until it did it to me and that was a wake-up call. one thing about me as governor when the cases came to me and i was given files about people who were seeking clemency or pardons, i acted appropriately. >> actually, no, they sat on

your desk and that's why you were sued. >> i did clemencies and i did pardons. i didn't do nearly enough. it wasn't a priority. i would acknowledge that. i didn't go to the office every day doing that. instead i was giving health care to all the children, free public transportation to seniors and disabled. >> actually you were holding up money to hospitals in order to get campaign contributions but what, listen, governor -- >> that's a business lie. they got $8 million from me. >> they got it after you left. >> i promised -- i ordered it before that happened and they got it while i was governor. that is not factual. >> okay. governor blagojevich, i do wish you the best. i really am glad for your family that you're out and -- >> i don't know by the way you were asking me questions. i'm sorry, anderson. i appreciate -- >> honestly, look, i have no problem with you getting out. the president can commute whoever he wants. i just think -- i wish you're besmirching prosecutors who actually are no longer in government but prosecutors are important to our system and you

are going after the very basis of our justice system which has plenty of problems but, you know, part of the thing is you got out, do you have an obligation to at least admit what you did wrong and you refuse to do that and creating a whole new alternate universe of facts and that may be big in politics today but it's still frankly just bullshit. we got to leave it there. >> it's not bullshit. i lived it all. >> thank you, governor. >> okay, thank you. a lot more ahead tonight, much of it is breaking news. what the president said about russian interference to help him wing re-election in spite of what his intelligence officials are telling him which is that they are indeed interfering as well as new reporting about how russia is working to -- i'm sorry about saying the bs word. also ahead, breaking news that could change the bloomberg campaign. women who signed nondisclosure agreements to talk about their complaints against the candidate.

the amount of student loan debt i have i'm embarrassed to even say i felt like i was going to spend my whole adult life paying this off thanks to sofi, i can see the light at the end of the tunnel as of 12pm today, i am debt free ♪ we have no debt, we don't owe anybody anything, and it's fantastic ♪ if you're 55 and up, t-mobile has a plan designed just for you. and, for a limited time only, we're making it an even better deal. now you can get two lines for only $55. that includes unlimited talk, text and data. with no annual service contracts. it also includes talk, text and data when traveling in mexico and canada. so if you're 55 and up, you can now get two lines for only $55. because at t-mobile, we have a plan designed just for you. through the at&t network, edge-to-edge intelligence gives you the power to see every corner of your growing business.

from managing inventory... to detecting and preventing threats... to scaling up your production. giving you a nice big edge over your competition. that's the power of edge-to-edge intelligence. ♪ oh, oh, (announcer)®! ♪ once-weekly ozempic® is helping many people with type 2 diabetes like james lower their blood sugar. a majority of adults who took ozempic® reached an a1c under 7 and maintained it. here's your a1c. oh! my a1c is under 7! (announcer) and you may lose weight. adults who took ozempic® lost on average up to 12 pounds. i lost almost 12 pounds! oh! (announcer) ozempic® does not increase the risk of major cardiovascular events like heart attack, stroke, or death. there's no increased risk. oh! and i only have to take it once a week. oh! ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪

(announcer) ozempic® should not be the first medicine for treating diabetes, or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not share needles or pens. don't reuse needles. do not take ozempic® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer, multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to ozempic®. stop taking ozempic® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, itching, rash, or trouble breathing. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. tell your doctor if you have diabetic retinopathy or vision changes. taking ozempic® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. common side effects are nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, and constipation. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. once-weekly ozempic® is helping me reach my blood sugar goal. ♪ oh, oh, oh, ozempic®! ♪ (announcer) you may pay as little as $25 per prescription. ask your health care provider today about once-weekly ozempic®.

♪ ♪ everything your trip needs, for everyone you love. expedia.

more breaking news. tough words for vladimir putin from a man whose 2020 campaign, the russians are trying to help according to u.s. intelligence. that man, however, is not president trump in this case, he's bernie sanders. shortly after "the washington post" reported today he is been briefed by intelligence officials on the interference sanders had this to say. >> the american people whether you're republican, democrats, independents are sick and tired of seeing russia and other countries interfering in our elections. the intelligence community has been very clear about it. >> according to "the post" it's not yet clear what form the interference has taken or what final end though in 20126 you'll recall they were involved in sowing dissension to help get trump elected in the general election. we already know the intelligence community concluded they are working to do it again on the president's behalf, which keep in mind brings us to president trump's reaction. because regardless of who you think should or shouldn't be president, it is self-evident that any president or any

candidate faced with such a challenge would say something similar to what senator sanders said today and in a sitting president's case would actually act on it. as we've been seeing play out the president has indeed acted on it but not in the way you would think any president would, fired his top intelligence official, joseph maguire, for having the temerity to allow the house members who actually have oversight responsibility in the matter to be briefed on all of this. figuratively speaking the president killed messenger, at least fired him. as for how seriously he takes the threat to the country and democracy we'll let the president speak for himself. >> i see these phonies, the do nothing democrats, they said today that putin wants to be sure that trump gets elected. here we go again. here we go again. did you see it? the story. aren't people bored? i was told a week ago they said they're trying to start a rumor, it's disinformation.

that's the only thing they're good at. they're not good at anything else. >> well, he also once again called this all a hoax which at least means he's consistent. here he is two summers ago reporting to dan coats saying that russia was undermining our democracy while standing next to the perpetrator himself vladimir putin. >> my people came to me, dan coats came to me and some others, they said they think it's russia. i have president putin, he just said it's not russia. i will say this, i don't see any reason why it would be. >> not only did the president publicly side with putin over coats and the intelligence community he ultimately got rid of dan coats and at odds with his hand picked fbi director and hand picked former acting attorney general and his former russia expert whom he fired after she testified in the impeachment hearings and warned against falling for russia's cover story. >> there's some questions and tapes i've heard, some of you on

this committee appear to believe that russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country and that perhaps somehow for some reason ukraine did. this is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the russian security services themselves. >> well, the president as you know has been pushing that exact same cover story, the question is why? you've heard his defenders say it's because he cannot tolerate any suggestion his election was tainted but with all due respect who cares? he didn't take an oath to preserve, protect and defend the purity of his victory or his feelings, it was to protect the constitution and so too the public servants he's fired for trying to live up to those same words. joining us a lawmaker in on the briefing that cost the acting dni his job. jim himes. you've seen the president call his assessment from his own officials a disinformation campaign. i know there's a lot you can't say but how do his comments square with what you have been

told about the facts? >> yeah, well, anderson, i can't talk about what was said behind closed doors. there's obviously a lot of media reports out there. i can certainly say, you know, the way the president articulated it blaming the democrats for another hoax, again, i can't confirm who said what but i can promise you that the democrats aren't saying anything here. you got a bunch of news reports about what might have been said in that meeting. but, look, we should unpack that a little bit, right? what was or wasn't said in that meeting isn't all that important. and we can come back to that. we can talk about why the russians might have an interest in bernie sanders or donald trump. it's not about them as individuals but creating schisms, about creating divisions in our body politic but what's really important is what you were talking about there. that the president in the oval office and i obviously wasn't there may have berated his chief intelligence official for telling him something he didn't want to hear and, anderson,

we've seen this movie before. when presidents or when people in power want the intelligence community to say something, we saw it under the bush administration in which the cia and george tenet, the director of the cia, famously characterized the existence of weapons of mass destruction in iraq as a slam dunk because that's what the vice president, dick cheney, and the president wanted to hear and there are thousands of americans and many hundreds of thousands of people who paid with their lives for that bastardization of that story. >> challenging conclusions and would be consistent with the interference that some of them have run for the president since he took office. how seriously do you believe house republicans are taking this? >> well, you know, it's a serious thing for then, right? we saw in the impeachment proceeding how all of the

republicans in the house and almost all the republicans in the senate are cowed by this president. they need to do what this president wants them to do or they lose their jobs. that's the dynamic on capitol hill right now. many of these folks are good people who behind closed doors express a lot of concern about what the president does. but they know that if they step out the way mitt romney does, they will be treated by the president and by conservative organizations the way mitt romney was treated. so, but, again, this really isn't about donald trump. this isn't about bernie sanders. this is about the fact, i believe, to the core of my being that the russians are going to try to do exactly what they did in 2016 again in 2020 and why wouldn't they? the president of the united states didn't hold them accountable for it. you know, there's really never been any accountability other than a few indictments, other than the intelligence community sort of showing that we know what happened and the president then denying it.

there's really never been accountability for the russians for what they did in 2016. >> yeah, and doing it again apparently. congressman himes, appreciate it. the former director of national intelligence joins us next. we'll be right back. to have a tn on top of severe ptsd, will take you down in the dump. after several denials, when i went to aspen dental, they gave me a free exam, free x-rays. the doctor comes in and then he's like, "you are in pain, so we're going to get you taken care of." i had no insurance. at aspen dental, we're all about yes. like yes to flexible hours and payment options. yes to 30% off dental services. and yes we'll take care of you, no matter what. call 1-800-aspendental today.

and i...was...shocked. right away, called my mom, called my sisters. i'm from cameroon, congo, and...the bantu people. i had ivory coast, and ghana...togo. i was grateful... i just felt more connected... to who i am. greater details. richer stories. and now with health insights. get your dna kit at ancestry.com. to put on our website? i mean i would have but i'm a commercial vehicle so i don't have hands... or a camera...or a website. should we franchise? is the market ready for that? can we franchise? how do you do that? meg! oh meg! we should do that thing where you put the business cards in the fishbowl and somebody wins something. -meg: hi. i'm here for... i'm here for the evans' wedding. -we've got the cake in the back, so, yeah.

-meg: thank you. -progressive knows small business makes big demands. -you're not gonna make it, you're not gonna make it! ask her if we can do her next wedding too! -so we'll design the insurance solution that fits your business. -on second thought, don't...ask that. that fits your business. [sneeare you ok?fles] yah, it's just a cold. it's not just a cold if you have high blood pressure. most cold medicines may raise blood pressure. coricidin hbp is the... ...#1 brand that gives... powerful cold relief without raising your blood pressure. with tender crisp technology. the best of pressure cooking and air frying are now in one pot. and only the ninja foodi has tender crisp technology, so you can cook foods that are crispy on the outside

and juicy on the inside. you may never need another appliance ever again. the ninja foodi pressure cooker. the pressure cooker that crisps.

more on tonight's breaking news. retired admiral william mcraven has just weighed in on the firing of joseph maguire and write, as americans we should be frightened. deeply afraid for the future of the nation. when good men and women can't speak the truth, when facts are inconvenient, when integrity and character no longer matter, when presidential ego and

self-preservation are more important than national security, then there's nothing left to stop the triumph of evil. joins us now is former dni james clapper who served under presidents in both parties currently cnn national security analyst. those words i got to say from men like mccraven, i mean, that's terrifying. >> you know, they're pretty, pretty compelling, anderson, and i think he has a point. clearly, i think he's affected by very close friendship, long-standing friendship of decades that he and joe maguire have, but he makes a good point about here is the acting director of national intelligence, an honorable man who served his country with great distinction in the navy as a s.e.a.l. and didn't campaign for this job and then just tried to do his duty as he saw fit living up to his oath of office

and was trying to convey truth to power and his reward for that was he got fired. >> yeah, i mean he wasn't attacking the president. he wasn't, you know, speaking behind the president's back. he was reporting to congress, which is what the job is. >> exactly. as required in the law, you know, you're supposed to keep the congress fully and currently informed. and that's what the office of director of national intelligence was doing. now as i'm hearing, the purge is under way at odni is purge of professionals and so i think the objective here is to neuter odni as much as possible. >> you know, it seemed like, i don't know, a year -- time seems to all blend together now, but, you know, it wasn't so long ago that, you know, advisers to the president in the white house were -- would go on tv and say, look, the president -- this administration is taking the, you know, concern about russian

interference incredibly seriously, et cetera, et cetera. the president continues to publicly, you know, he's calling it disinformation. he's now fired the guy who is reporting to congress about it and a lot of the people who were saying, you know, this administration is taking it seriously, they're gone too. they're all out. i mean how concerned are you that this threat is not being taken seriously by had administration? >> well, i'm very concerned about it and the threat that we portrayed in our assessment of january 17 still holds. the russians on the heels and the wake of their success in 2016 clearly they're going to do it again in 2020. and they really don't care about anyone. their objective is to sow as much discord and distrust and dissent in this country as they possibly can and they're already exc excelling and, you know, the

election is months away. >> the idea -- i mean to that point it's also a point that congressman himes made moments ago on the program, which is that this isn't about, you know, russia backing sanders or backing trump. it's about or i mean it may be but it's certainly about sowing dissension and can look at it in different ways but the idea regardless of who they're supporting, the end result is to sow dissension. >> exactly. and that was their objective in '16 and always has been their objective. they have a long history of meddling in other elections and we have a history of it going back to at least the '60s. just the mackney today of what they've lately done notably in social media and i suspect the reason for -- i'll use air quotes here -- supporting bernie sanders is that's a way to promote divisiveness within the democratic party and it's just their cynical analysis of how to sow discord in this country and they excel at it.

they have a very sophisticated understanding of our political landscape. >> general clapper, appreciate it. thank you. up next more on the political and legal dimensions of all this as our breaking news continues in a moment. ♪ if you have moderate to severe psoriasis, little things can become your big moment. that's why there's otezla. otezla is not a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable. don't use if you're allergic to otezla. it may cause severe diarrhea, nausea, or vomiting.

otezla is associated... ...with an increased risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression... ...or suicidal thoughts or if these feelings develop. some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. upper respiratory tract infection and headache may occur. tell your doctor about your medicines, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. otezla. show more of you. that gives me cash back onesome new aeverything.akuten that's ebates. i get cash back on electronics, travel, clothes. you're talking about ebates. i can't stop talking about rakuten. pretty good deal - peter sfx [blender] ebates is now rakuten, sign up today. wheyou want relief... fast. only thermacare ultra pain relieving cream has 4 active ingredients to fight pain 4 different ways. get powerful relief today, with thermacare. -well, audrey's expecting... -twins!

grandparents! we want to put money aside for them, so...change in plans. alright, let's see what we can adjust. ♪ we'd be closer to the twins. change in plans. okay. mom, are you painting again? you could sell these. lemme guess, change in plans? at fidelity, a change in plans is always part of the plan. with time, comes change that's for sure... lemme guess, change in plans? and when those changes might help more people, especially those in retirement, i think it's worth talking about! so, aag is introducing a new jumbo reverse mortgage loan so you can now access as much as $4 million dollars in cash,

tax free, from your home's equity. aag's new jumbo reverse mortgage loan can give you more tax-free cash than ever before. if you've had your home for a while, it's probably worth a lot more today. so why not use that appreciation for anything you need maybe it's some home repairs, or updates to make it more comfortable so you can stay in the place you love. it's a viable effective way to support your other investments long into the future, and another way aag is working to make your retireme... better. don't wait. get your info kit now! before the break you heard a frankly chilling warning tonight from the former commander of the u.s. operations.

let's get some perspective from "new york times" contributing editor and cnn political commentator rick santorum and kerry porderro. senator santorum, shouldn't the president be concerned that russia's meddling in the 2020 elections like they did in 2016 and calling it a democratic hoax? >> well, you know, i think he should be concerned and i believe he is concerned. i think he's concerned that this information is being fed out there and that it leads to exactly what your previous guests had talked about. dissension and conflict between democrats an republicans. and i think the president unfortunately played into that. i think you've seen democrats react the same way. i'm pleased the ones running for president the same way, sort of trying to sew dissension which accomplishes exactly what the

russians hope to do, which is to sew doubt about the validity of our elections. >> the president called this idea disinformation essentially. he said this is misinformation and the information he is -- >> the specific thing is it's helping his campaign. i don't think he's saying the russians are involved in trying to affect the election as disinformation. i think everyone accepts that as the truth. >> does the president? >> trump doesn't accept it. >> he told vladimir putin he doesn't understand why they would be involved. >> remember when he stood next to putin like an impotent lap dog. he threw his own -- >> that's not what we're complaining about. >> he's been complaining about them talking about the -- >> let me bring the receipts. bring the receipts and let's debate it out, all right? the reason why trump is a russian asset is because trump behaves like a russian asset.

trump has said that his own intelligence agencies are part of the deep state. he throws them under the bus. he doesn't agree that they have concluded in the 2016 election. he believes vladimir putin. he promotes all talking points. he is sending attorney general william barr on taxpayer dollars to gather evidence to promote a russian conspiracy theory that ukraine, not russia was involved. instead of doing something as a commander in chief, he fires dni maguire by simply presenting him information. if putin's goal is to weaken democracy and hurt institutions, trump is putin's asset. >> the reality is that that donald trump has been tougher on russia than any president in recent history. look at what he's done with respect to ukraine and supporting them in the process as well as a whole host of other

things. >> and blagojevich is a political prisoner. >> anderson -- >> all of this objecting is russia wants him to win, that's the objection. >> kerry, go ahead. >> we've outlined what the problem is, which the problem is that congress needs to be able to obtain and the public needs to understand exactly what the russian activities are with respect to threatening and conducting activities to interfere in the 2020 election, and we have a president who is hostile to the intelligence community and doesn't accept or even want to be discussed with congress that intelligence information. the way that we need to fix that problem is the intelligence committees need to schedule the worldwide threat briefing and instead of conducting these hearings even though normally intelligence committee hearings would be conducted behind closed

doors. it needs to be conducted like it is every year, in public. they need to call the intelligence chiefs, including whoever happens to be the acting director of intelligence on that day along with the other chiefs of the other intelligence elements who have information about the 2020 election threat and they need to testify in open session. what that will do is drive two things just quickly. one, it will produce a written statement that the white house will see ahead of time. so there won't be a surprise about what's in the written statement. the second piece is that then members of congress in open session can ask these officials under oath what the actual intelligence is. the risk is that the president might not like what is said in open session and he might even fire people, but if that's what happens, that will be information and a data point that the public will have to understand why he doesn't want this information out. >> senator santorum, does it

concern you that the president fired joe maguire, i mean, for it seems like doing what was his job, which is reporting to congress. no? >> again, i mean, you know, i've got -- there's been lots of reporting about what was actually said in that hearing and the amount of evidence that actually supported the idea, or intelligence that supported the idea, but president trump's campaign was specifically being helped. i think that was the real concern. of course, you know, look, let's just be honest. the intelligence committee is where the impeachment and adam schiff is where the impeachment came from. that's obviously a very sensitive point on the part of the president that this what seems to be shaky information, that they did not get a heads up on, was briefed to the committee that started the impeachment against him. >> where else are you going to go? they're the intelligence committee. >> i guess there's protocols. if you're going to brief this to a committee that just impeached

the president, you might want to let the president know and give him the backup as to why they're going to say those things. >> i can sort of understand why the president wasn't happy with the way things went down. >> it's hard to imagine that the president wasn't given the same information and informed whatever congress was informed of that it would have caught them by surprise. >> the president was impeached for trying to abuse his power to force ukraine to interfere in our elections. he said he is open towards interference. he asked russia in 2016, russia, if you're listening. the question i have for republicans and donald trump is why are you not protecting u.s. elections from foreign interference? why are you spending money for space force? why are you spending money to bail out farmers? why don't you spend money to help our elections. if donald trump is watching, you criticized the movie "parasite."

one tweet to criticize vladimir putin. i dare you to criticize him once. give me one tweet to prove you're against him. >> more breaking news straight ahead involving democratic candidate michael bloomberg and nondisclosure agreements with several witnesses. cologuard: colon cancer screening

for people 45 plus at average risk. i took your advice and asked my doctor to order cologuard, that noninvasive colon cancer screening test. the delivery guy just dropped it off. our doctor says it uses advanced science. it's actually stool dna technology that finds 92 percent of colon cancers. no prep, and private. colon cancer screening that's as easy as get, go, gone. false positive and negative results may occur. ask your healthcare provider if cologuard is right for you.

ask your healthcare provider you look more like a heather.a. do you ever get that? it's nice to finally meet you in person. you're pete nocchio? oh, the pic? that was actually a professional headshot. i'm sure that's it, yeah. i, uh, i think i've lost a few pounds recently too. i'm actually doing a juice cleanse. wait! you don't... (glass breaking) (gasp) ah! oh...! with geico, the savings keep on going. just like this sequel. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on car insurance.

more breaking news tonight. this time from the michael bloomberg campaign. he says he will release three women who made complaints involving him from non-disclosure agreements. this after fellow democrat elizabeth warren first raised the issue wednesday night in the first televised debate. >> the mayor has to stand on his record, and what we need to know is exactly what's lurking out there. he has gotten some number of women, dozens, who knows, to sign non-disclosure agreements, both for sexual harassment and

for gender discrimination in the workplace. so, mr. mayor, are you willing to release all of those women from those non-disclosure agreements so we can hear their side of the story? just last night in the town hall, senator warren offered this. >> so i used to teach contract law and i thought i would make this easy. i wrote up a release and covenant not to sue and all that mayor bloomberg has to do is download it, i'll text it, sign it. >> in a tweet late today bloomberg said his company identified three ndas signed over the past 30 years and women who contact the company, he says, will be released from those three. speaking with reporters tonight, senator warren says the release is just not good enough.

bloomberg needs to do a blanket release. joining us now is bloomberg adviser tim o'brien. what changed? 24 hours ago mayor bloomberg said he was sticking with the nondisclosure agreements, that the women wanted it that way and all the parties wanted it that way. >> senator warren is an insightful, courageous and admirable public servant. i think it's wise for us to pay attention to anything that she shy ligh highlights. that's what mike is trying to do. i'm disappointed in how senator warren chose to put this on the stage. she quoted things that mike allegedly said that he didn't. i think she knew that. i think she's highlighting this issue to distract from the fact that michael bloomberg has a very admirable record in total around women in workplace, women

with philanthropy, our campaign platform is all about empowering women in all of those spheres but obviously we can do better. i think a lot of the spin around this issue with sexual harassment, there are headlines that 40 or so women sued michael for sharexual harassment. i think it was to focus that michael bloomberg had been involved in dozens of cases -- >> so you're saying there's been only three? >> three cases over 30 years that mike was involved in directly, and he's willing to lift the nda on those because he's one of the parties involved. his hesitation in the other cases is that other people were involved. >> and you're saying the other cases at bloomberg were related to bloomberg as a company, not to michael bloomberg specifically? >> correct. and a lot of these headlines --

look, i think this is an important issue for us to focus on in the me-too era. men have had their foot on women's necks for quite a long time and i'm grateful to senator warren for flagging it, but i also think it's done an incredible disservice to what is true about mike's record with women over dozens of years. i think the women who worked for him by and large, the vast majority of women who work for him know what he's done in terms of his respect for them in the workplace, his respect for them on this campaign and his respect for empowering him at a time when donald trump is obviously on the other end of the spectrum. >> can you guarantee those three are the only ndas involving michael bloomberg? just to be clear, are there are

any ndas involving the mayor and matters aside language he alleged live us allegedly used? >> our lawyers looked at this extensively and these are the only three that involved mike directly. >> senator warren said it isn't good enough, that the mayor should sign a blanket release, don't put the onus on the other party to seek relief from the company. why have you set it up if those three women contact the company, then that's the process? >> well, you know, senator warren's a lawyer. she represented a lot of companies that sign ndas. i think she understands that in many corporate cases there are standard way of trying to resolve litigation outside the court system and it protects all the parties involved not to release all of them en masse. i do think, however, that there's a concern that these have been used to silence women in the workplace and i think

that's a valid and important concern. and, in fact, what bloomberg lp hasty sided itt itt itty -- ha use ndas in harassment claims that come up in the company. we're grateful to senator warren for highlighting that. i think she's done a disservice to presenting an accurate portrayal of who mike is over his life with women and women's issues, but we'll go forward on this. >> tim o'brien, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thank you, anderson. >> coming up, new details on john bolton's book when we come back. ♪ ♪

everything your trip needs for everyone you love. expedia. can it help keep me asleep? sleep number event on the sleep number 360 smart bed. absolutely, it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. it's the final days to save 50% on the sleep number 360 limited edition smart bed. plus 0% interest for 24 months. ends sunday. my body is truly powerful. i have the power to lower my blood sugar and a1c. because i can still make my own insulin. and trulicity activates my body to release it like it's supposed to. trulicity is for people with type 2 diabetes. it's not insulin. i take it once a week. it starts acting in my body from the first dose. trulicity isn't for people with type 1 diabetes

or diabetic ketoacidosis. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, or severe stomach pain. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, belly pain, and decreased appetite, which lead to dehydration and may worsen kidney problems. i have it within me to lower my a1c. ask your doctor about trulicity. at bayer, we're helping to adto repair heart tissue.es so bill can scream his heart out. without putting his heart in danger. at bayer, this is why we science. how we worship, or who we love.

and the 2020 census is how that great promise is kept. because this is the count that informs where hundreds of billions in funding will go each year for things like education, healthcare, and programs that touch us all. shape your future. start here. learn more at 2020census.gov infallible up to 24hr demand morfresh wear.wear. by l'oreal paris. excellent coverage with no weigh down. a lightweight, breathable formula for fresh skin hour after hour. defies transfer, no excess. longwear with no compromise. infallible up to 24hr fresh wear. now in 40 shades. by l'oreal paris. i'm worth it. build a clear plan for retirement. one that covers health care costs, taxes, and any other uncertainties. because when you're with fidelity,

a partner who makes sure every step is clear, there's nothing to stop you from moving forward. it's been a very busy night. more breaking news, "the washington post" reporting that the president has, quote, directly weighed in, unquote, on the security review of john bolton's upcoming book. the president is telling staffer that hebolton as a traitor and he will try to block the publishing of the book. >> the news continues.

a lot more ahead. i want to hand it over to chris for "cuomo primetime." big news, russia is interfering. now, the next hurdle in the election, nevada. and we have pete buttigieg tonight. he needs a big finish and he needs more than that. he needs big money. but first, we have to look at what the president did today. it's supposed to be a job, the first job is keep us safe but what did he just do with this intel overhaul? what did he do when he found out that congress was being cold about the interference? you won't believe it. let's go after it. the white house said that the president has been briefed