a book that you're ready to share with the world? get published now, call for your free publisher kit today! this is "gps," the global public square. welcome to you around the world. i'm fareed zakaria. today on the show, a special report on fixing the covid crisis. president trump may say the pandemic is under control in america, but that is just not the reality. the country has per capita about 15 times as many deaths every day as the european union and 25 times as many as canada.

so, what went wrong and what can we do now to get the coronavirus under control? i will talk to bill gates about that, plus vaccines, treatments, the u.s. economy, tiktok and more. and school is back in session, or will be soon. for most kids that means bus rides, packed hallways and overcrowded classrooms. can that be safe in the midst of a pandemic? i will ask the former director of the cdc, tom friedman. also, beirut, the bustling and beautiful city by the sea was hit by an extraordinary explosion. as the political tragedy of lebanon finally reached its heart-rendering rock bottom? i will explore. but first, here's my take. this week the trump

administration explicitly announced its intention to work towards a new bipolar world of technology kafshed up between the united states and china. it announced a sweeping clean network initiative which seeks to ban virtually all chinese i.t. products, phone carriers, apps, cloud service, even under sea tables. then trump issued executive orders officially banning the chinese video app tiktok and the messaging app wechat from operating in the u.s. unless they are sold by mid-september. taken together these moves suggest a reversal of decades of american policy. instead of favoring a global internet of open systems, open architecture and open communications, the u.s. now envisions a restricted internet that is cordoned off by governments will political considerations dominating economic or technological ones. let's be clear. there are legitimate concerns about china's technology

strategy. the company has walled off its cyberspace like no other country. the government can force any chinese company to hand over data and it routinely engages in international espionage to steal intellectual property, technology and data from other countries. in 2018 bytedance, the chinese company that owns tiktok was forced to shutter a different app, the young tech savvy ceo zhang published a letter of self-criticism that read like a confession at a stalinist show trial. quote, i profoundly reflect on the fact that a deep-level cause of the recent problems in my company is a weak understanding and implementation of the four consciousnesses of xi jinping. all along, we have placed excessive emphasis on the role of technology and we have not acknowledged that technology must be led by the socialist core value system, unquote. yet fears about tiktok do seem

overblown. the user data on it, names, email addresses, phone numbers, location data, are easy to get through other mechanism. other apps collect the same information and sell it to anyone who's willing to pay. meanwhile, the fear that the chinese communist party could spread its values through tiktok videos is silly. does anyone believe soviet propaganda films from the 1950s and '60s brainwashed americans? and to the extent the app could be used by es pea nan by chinese. the russians, for example, have used foreign countries and apps as gateways to enter the networks of other countries, including the u.s. banning one chinese app won't meaningfully reduce that threat. the ban on wechat is a bit more complicated but again it remains unclear what the administration's concern is and whether a blanket ban is the best strategy. the trump administration's decisions on tiktok and wechat,

like so many of its decisions, look like arbitrary, impulsive ones made in the heat of the moment, prompted by the timing around the presidential election more than anything else. the clean network initiative does not even pretend to put forward neutral principles to determine which companies would be banned. it is an explicitly anti-chinese strategy, one that will be impossible to implement consistently. by its lajic, for example, american companies and embassies around the world would have to stop using local phone networks that rely on chinese equipment. since dozens of countries, many in africa and asia, use huawei. how are americans supposed to communicate without the phone system? carrier pigeons? the trump administration has recognized an important danger that emanates from china. the smart way to address it would be to set up rules that promote transparent, open systems and to mobilize a coalition of like-minded countries to pressure beijing

and other violators like moscow. eric schmidt who used to run google told me, america benefits enormously from having a large, open global economy, especially in the technology space. it means greater integration, faster transactions, more innovation. if all this starts eroding, we will face unknown and potentially huge consequences. already we can see that the united states' new approach has had an effect. countries around the world from britain to india, are now embracing the idea of internet sovereignty, local companies, of course, use this concept to try to maintain their dominance and squash competition. so, facebook raises alarms about tiktok, which has become a fierce competitor. expect more such petitions to washington in the future. the united states government is now comfortable slapping tariffs on foreign products using bogus national security justifications, selecting

companies for special favors often granted personally by the president and exercising intrusive control over the internet. instead of the chinese adopting the american model, america is adopting the chinese model. go to cnn.com/fareed for a link to my washington post column this week. and let's get started. there are almost 20 million confirmed cases of covid around the world and 5 million of those are in the united states. that means america, with about 5% of the world's population, has 25% of the cases. the question many are asking is, how did the u.s. do so badly? i wanted to talk about that and more with bill gates, who now dedicates most of his time to the bill and melinda gates foundation, which is in the forefront of fighting the pandemic. bill gates, pleasure to have you

on again, sir. >> great to be on. >> so, if somebody, a space alien, came down and said, mr. gates, you understand everything, how do you explain the fact that the richest country on earth, that spends per capita maybe two to three times as much on health care as all the other rich countries in the world, seems to be kind of at the bottom of the pile of the advanced countries in the world in being able to handle this pandemic, what would be your answer? >> well, it took a number of mistakes. and i wouldn't have predicted that we would do so poorly. you know, our center for disease control is the best group of epidemiologists in the world. in fact, everyone relies on them. you know, they're a part of our polio eradication work, very embedded at w.h.o. headquarters.

they're very good, but a variety of missteps by the u.s. and then the political atmosphere meant that we didn't get our testing going. you know, it's nonsense that any sort of travel ban we did was at all beneficial. that, you know, doesn't pass the common sense test in terms of the waves of people that u.s. citizens that were allowed to keep coming in. and now, you know, we executed our lockdowns less nationwide and with less fidelity than other countries. so, we're taking a pretty dramatic price, and not just in deaths. we also pay it in terms of the economic toll, which is up in the trillions. >> so, when you look at the charts -- the united states and europe suffered about the same kind of curve, you know, upward climb of infections and deaths. and then the europeans start to

go down and u.s. starts to go down. but then we start to climb up again. and around that time, i remember you coming on this program and saying, the lockdown has to be national. the only way this works is if it's a real national lockdown, otherwise with border travel among states it's not going to mean anything. was that the crucial mistake you had that much variation? and isn't the problem -- there were parts of the country that felt like they had no infection, they had no outbreak. >> what's intress ive is italy, fans, spain, who had a wave before us, managed as they fell off to keep even the parts of the country that hadn't had the intense epidemic from creating a second wave. and so it's pretty focal in all of those countries. and so they had fallen to the paradox we did, which is that

the regions that it had the least burden in the first wave were right for that second wave. in the case of the united states, they opened up their bars, they didn't do much in the way of wearing masks. and so those areas became this second wave. not a rebound out of new york/new jersey, but, instead, those regions. and so that's where europe and the u.s. are quite different. our testing, of course, to this day, it's mind-blowing that because you can't get the federal government to improve the testing because they just want to say how great it is, you know, i've said to them, look, have a cdc website that prioritizes who gets website. that's trivial to do. they won't pay attention to that. i've said, don't reimburse any tests so the result goes back

after three days. you're paying billion dollars in to get the worst test results of any country in the world. you've created this incentive for the commercial guys to have long lines because you do not -- you want to waste government money. you pay as much for the late result as the timely result. no other country has the testing insan sti because they won't talk about fixing it because they're -- you know, they think they need to just keep acting like they've done a competent job. >> so, this seems to me to be the critical systemic problem we have. you look at germany. they use the period of the lockdown to then put in place a good testing regime, which is rapid, which then has some tracing element. and we just have not been able to do this. can you explain to people very simply why a test result that comes back to you three days

later is almost worthless, because you're really just testing if somebody has covid that minute, that second, right? >> yeah. your period of infectiousness can start a couple days before you would feel the symptoms to seek out a test and extend to about four days after. that's almost all of your infectiousness. so, the fall of the test is that when you get that result that your positive, that then you quarantine yourself and you don't infect members of your household or other people that you know. is every day that goes by, that peak of infectiousness is going down, down, down. by even the third day, the value is, you know, maybe 20% of a timely result. now, you know, very wealthy people have access to these quick turn-around tests or they get ahead in line.

and they're getting more of those overall tests. so, the one breakthrough we did -- the foundation did get pushed through is that instead of a health provider having to jam a swab to the super back of your nose that you could just self-administer the tip of your nose. that's equally accurate and doesn't risk infecting the other person and it can speed up the activity. >> so, at this point, what could be done to really substantially change the trajectory in the united states? >> well, the trajectory over time will go down because we're learning there's some protection from earlier exposure to other coronaviruses, and that's helping drive the numbers down. there's natural infection, particularly the people who move around a lot. they're disproportionately infected. once they recover, they're taking out of that transmission pool. and then the vaccine will come along, you know, maybe towards

the end of the year, certainly within the first half of 2021. and if the first vaccines that get chosen are good at transmission-blocking, you'll very quickly get up where the multiplication rate, instead of being above one and growing exponentially, will be below one and you'll have a diving number of cases and just a few pockets left. so, because of the innovation, the therapeutics will get the death rate and the vaccine will dramatically, once we roll it out, it will cut the infection rate. so, you know, by the end of 2021, the u.s. in terms of its own epidemic, will largely be through it. but in the meantime, trillions of economic damage and hundreds of thousands of lives lost. >> what would be your message right now to the president, to

governors, what can they do now? as you say, there is a natural cycle, but how can you get to a point where you are -- it seems like you could differentiate risks in terms of the people, the population, the activities. right now nothing happens. people who i know were flown into the united states and they say it's like no other country in the world. nothing happens. you're told nothing. it's as if there is no covid. >> because we're one of the most infected countries in the world, people coming here on average will reduce our infection rate. so, it's not -- you know, now, the day will come when the u.s. has its act together and that's partly why, to avoid reinfections, i'm spending a lot of time trying to make sure money for buying the vaccine for the developing countries is included in this relief bill. you know, it would be about $8

billion for therapeutics and vaccines, so less than 1% of the total. but that's the money that more than any other would save lives, strengthen our strategic position with our allies versus china, and allow us to not have these constant reinfection events that people like australia or south korea who did a competent job, they still have americans and others when they come in starting new chains of infection. next on "gps," we'll talk about the countries that have weathered covid well. what did they do right? bill gates tells us when we come back. find pants that aren't sweats. find your friends. find your sense of wander. find the world is new, again. at chevy we'd like to take you there. now during the chevy open road sales event, get up to 15% of msrp cash back on select 2020 models.

that's over fifty-seven hundred dollars cash back on this equinox. it's time to find new roads, again. is a friendly neighbor. they're teachers, retirees, vets, people committed to doing right by getting the count right. if you haven't responded yet, they'll be stopping by to ask some simple questions that will inform how billions in federal funds are spent on local services every year for the next decade. so when they come knocking, say hi from a safe distance and do your part to support your community. time is running out. shape your future. start here at 2020census.gov. - i'm szasz. shape your future. [norm] and we live in columbia, missouri. we do consulting, but we also write. [szasz] we take care of ourselves constantly; it's important. we walk three to five times a week, a couple miles at a time. - we've both been taking prevagen for a little more than 11 years now. after about 30 days of taking it, we noticed clarity that we didn't notice before.

- it's still helping me. i still notice a difference. prevagen. healthier brain. better life. walk to end alzheimer's alzheis everywhere.tion on every sidewalk, track, and trail across this country.

all of us are raising funds for one goal: a world without alzheimer's and all other dementia. because this disease isn't waiting, neither are you. take the first step on your walk right now. go to alz dot org slash walk. another bundle in the books. got to hand it to you, jamie. your knowledge of victorian architecture really paid off this time. nah, just got lucky. so did the thompsons. that faulty wiring could've cost them a lot more than the mudroom. thankfully they bundled their motorcycle with their home and auto. they're protected 24/7. mm. what do you say? one more game of backgammon? [ chuckles ] not on your life. [ laughs ] ♪ when the lights go down

[ laughs ] ♪ apps except work.rywhere... why is that? is it because people love filling out forms? maybe they like checking with their supervisor to see how much vacation time they have. or sending corporate their expense reports. i'll let you in on a little secret. they don't. by empowering employees to manage their own tasks, paycom frees you to focus on the business of business. to learn more, visit paycom.com a book that you're ready to share with the world? get published now, call for your free publisher kit today! so, let's talk about the

rest of the world. when you look at covid from a global standpoint, what strikes you? because it still, to me, seems odd that you have such variation. you know, if you look at a place like sri lanka or pakistan, pakistan which has done almost nothing as far as i can tell, you know, infections are not going crazy, death rates are not going crazy, there may be some underreporting, of course. then you have the fact of places like vietnam or taiwan, where they have really a stunningly low death rate. and then you have, of course, northern italy, new york. what is all this telling you? are you drawing any conclusion about the nature of the virus? >> well, there's a view patterns. countries that had mers or sars episodes in the checklist if a respiratory disease came along, they needed to reach out to the commercial testing groups and get capacity and get

turn-around. because they caught it early with competent testing, which the u.s. did not, they had such low level of cases, then contact tracing works. south korea being a fantastic example of that. some, you know, people have very good health system it is like vietnam. we also believe now that the related coronavirus exposure, because there's so many bats in -- as you get into southeast asia there, that they probably, you know, within a few months will really understand this. they probably had this cross-protection that meant the spread of the disease was not as strong there. also having a young population, you know, was beneficial. pakistan had a pretty bad peak in karachi, but now they look like europe. those numbers come down. india is still, sadly, in a

growth phase as is lots of south america. africa, we know south africa is tough. the rest of africa we've been funding a lot of testing there because it's a bit opaque what goes on. and the lungs in africa, you're more exposed to indoor and outdoor p outdoor partic lar late so you can get a disease compared to a rich country. >> do you worry about just how bad it's going to get for these poor countries? not only do they face, of course, the health care issues with a weak health care system, but then they are inevitably going to be -- the loss of economic activity. i think they say india is going to have a 5% shrinking of its economy this year, then the debt they'll have to take. it seems like there's going to be a cascading set of crises here. >> yeah, it's crazy because you have so many of the developing countries having these setbacks.

not only do you have the direct death and sickness from this disease, but their health systems have no extra capacity. and the fragility of people's incomes, losing a bit of money there means you don't have enough money to eat, it increases malnutrition. these are governments whose very stability is right on the edge. so, these setbacks can lead to instability, complete breakdown in governments all together. and so, yes, the developing countries, even if their death tolls aren't gigantic, will pay a far greater price for the pandemic than the rich countries. >> you've talked about the vaccine. when we talked earlier, you talked about treatment and you were actually somewhat more optimistic there would be treatments before there were vaccines. where do we stand on that? >> there's a lot of good things in the pipeline. the two that are out are the

anti-viral from gilead remdesivir which we're trying to get lower cost, it's still hard to make and administer. there are two other anti-virals that are coming along that could be done by the end of the year. perhaps most promising are monoclonal antibodies and we still don't know how large the dose will be. but within a few months, eli lilly, as stra will get emergency authorization. those, if they work as well as we think, could bring the death rate down by 70% or even 80%. then finally we have immune modulators. we funded a trial in the uk that proved, one calleddetthmaxazone. so in combination therapeutics could cut the death rate a lot, even before the vaccine gets out, even though we'll still

want the vaccine to stop transmission. next on "gps," i will ask bill gates whether today's tech giants have gotten too big. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪when you have nausea, ♪upset stomach, diarrheaon,♪ pepto bismol coats and soothes your stomach for fast relief and now, get the same fast relief in a delightful chew with new pepto bismol chews.

latonight, silence it with newd byzzzquil night pain.

because pain should never get in the way of a restful night's sleep. new zzzquil night pain. silence pain, sleep soundly. simon pagenaud takes the lead at the indy 500!

coming to the green flag, racing at daytona. they're off... in the kentucky derby. rory mcllroy is a two time champion at east lake. he scores! stanley cup champions! touchdown! only mahomes. the big events are back and xfinity is your home for the return of live sports. back now with more of my interview with bill gates on his other field of expertise, technology. one of the things americans have been surprised, you know, amazed by, is in the midst of this economic paralysis, you know, with some metrics worse than the great depression, some companies have done unbelievably well. the major technology companies.

and they've been called before congress and there are concerns they've become too powerful, too dominant, monopolies. you know a little about that whole story. what was your reaction to the four companies that were called before congress. are they too big? do they have monopoly power that needs to be regulated? >> there are definitely legitimate issues. when you're super successful, the idea that congress is going to ask you tough questions from time to time, that comes with success. in my case, i was all alone, you know. they -- you know, there were four at a time. i don't know why they didn't take them one at a time. definitely diluted the coherence of what was going asked. the idea of these marketplaces, should they offer their own branded products, should they

unbundle the -- there are lots of structural issues, competition issues, to look at. my general view is that even though there may be some things there, you know, like not letting messages be encrypted so you can see conspiracy theories and child pornography or making sure these markets are fair and let competitors come in. perhaps rethink some of the acquisitions. overall, it's easy to underestimate how naturally competitive technology markets are. not on a day-to-day basis, but over time as new platforms, new approaches come along. congress has an important role to play there, but also the natural competitive dynamics should make sure that prices keep coming down and innovation moves at high speed. >> and do you think the united states government should be in the business of banning a

consumer technology product used to make dance videos? i know microsoft is going to possibly buy tiktok, but i'm asking you, in a sense, the broader question. is there a real vital national security threat to tiktok being owned by a chinese company? >> yeah, we need principles that are applied broadly and in a predictable way. you know, is a messaging service where you have private messages, you know, is that more invasive than, say, the video watching. so, some principles will have to be crafted. it's fair to say that for a variety of reasons the social networking companies in the u.s. never really had a chance of success in china. and so when people talk about reciprocal things, you could say that's unusual that that

opportunity was provided. i think with china -- we're in this for the long haul, so really figuring out where there's still win-wins and how to bhaf in a predictable fashion, that will be important. both parties want to think about how we connect with china over time and so they -- so there's opportunities to preserve what's good and, you know, act in a way that we are principled, a country would operate in an illegal basis. that will be interesting to watch because it's a very important relationship. >> bill gates, always a pleasure to have you on, sir. thank you. >> thank you. next on "gps," the devastating explosion in beirut. what caused it? the answer is tragic and illuminating.

behind every 2020 census taker's mask

is a friendly neighbor. they're teachers, retirees, vets, people committed to doing right by getting the count right. if you haven't responded yet, they'll be stopping by to ask some simple questions that will inform how billions in federal funds are spent on local services every year for the next decade. so when they come knocking, say hi from a safe distance and do your part to support your community. time is running out. shape your future. start here at 2020census.gov. the story of black america is the story of america. it's the story of a people who have pushed this country to live up to its stated ideals. but black people have always believed in the promise of a better america. so, at this moment we're in now- we must choose to fight for that better america. and just like our ancestors who stood up to the violent racists of a generation ago, we will stand up to this president - and say 'no more'.

because america is better than him. so we choose to be bigger, we choose to be bolder, we choose to bring back justice, respect and dignity to this country. we choose joe biden... to lead us towards that american promise, together. i'm joe biden and i approve this message. ♪

and now for our what in the world segment. on tuesday the world watched in horror as an explosion caused by nearly 3,000 tons of ammonium nitrate ripped through beirut. that is the same key ingredient used in the 1995 oklahoma city bombing, but 1,500 times more of it. the blast was so incredibly strong, it was felt 150 miles away on the island of cyprus. we won't know the true death toll for a long time, but thousands were injured and hundreds of thousands were displaced from their homes. the first question on everyone's mind, of course, was, is this a bomb? no. it turns out that that massive amount of explosive material had, for reasons that defy logical explanation, been stored at the port since 2014. and the central government has over the years ignored multiple

warnings and requests to move it. in a sense, it is a reminder of the tragedy of lebanon. incompetent, inefficient and deeply corrupt government. at the time of the blast, lebanon was already in a state of major crisis. a beirut native, now professor of international relations at the london school of economics says the political establishment has been plundering the country for decades. he estimated that more than 50% of lebanon lives in poverty today. the signs of collapse are everywhere. electricity is incredibly scarce, garbage collection barely takes place. late last year the streets erupted in discontent, as they did this weekend, pouring onto the rubble-filled avenues to voice the concerns of the incompetence of their leaders. to make matters worse, the port of the epicenter of the blast, thus destroyed, was the main artery for goods to come in and out of the country. some 60% of lebanon's imports came through beirut's harbor.

remember the country is surrounded by war on one side and enemy on the other. most of its land borders with syria, the rest with israel. where to start on rebuilding this nation that was already so deeply damaged? let's start with the price tag. estimates run into tens of billions of dollars to fix what the blast broke. over the course of the week, nations across the globe have pledged their support and president macron of france hosted a donor conference today. but he doubts the integrity of lebanon officials to distribute the aid without lining their own pockets. president macron apparently has similar concerns. when he visited the s shell-shocked city on thursday, he pledged his country's age to the former colony would not go into corrupt hands. professor of journalism at the american university in beirut tells "gps" he has a plan to make sure all aid money gets where it is supposed to go.

he proposes a competent of ngos, ak dims, professional, civics to oversee the government to fair distribution of the promised aid. he says it would not only rebuild beirut but build back confidence in lebanon's leaders. sometimes these kind of crises can have the effect of a wake-up call and jolt a country to a change and reform. lebanon desperately needs such a shock to the system. the country was once a model for the middle east. today it is becoming more like syria or iraq. mismanaged basket cases. in a different era, he says the united states would have played president macron's role, in organizing an international conference, gathering funds and pressing for reform and rebuilding. in a post-american middle east, this tragedy runs the risk of simply festering and becoming one more piece of ditritis in an

already embattled region. lebanon is one of the oldest settlements. people in desperate need of medical attention and supplies. please consider visiting cnn.com/impact to find out how you can help. next on "gps," the question on the minds of every parent, grandparent, uncle and aunt, perhaps more importantly, every teacher. how in the world do we send our kids back to school safely? the former cdc director tom friedman will lay it out for us. to give you the protein you need with less of the sugar you don't. [grunting noise] i'll take that. woohoo! 30 grams of protein and 1 gram of sugar. ensure max protein. with nutrients to support immune health.

(woman chattering) - [narrator] ordering dinner for the family? (family gasps) rewarded with a side of quiet. (baby murmuring) grubhub rewards you, (scooter horn honking) get a free delivery perk when you order. (doorbell rings) - [group] grubhub.

for spending a perfectly reasonable amount of time on the couch with tacos from grubhub? rewarded! get a free delivery perk when you order. - [group] grubhub. start remotely. >> on wednesday, chicago mayor lori lightfoot announced chicago schools would be all virtual for at least the first two months. on friday new york's governor cuomo gave the green light for all the state's school systems, including new york city's, to hold in-person classes.

and that seems to be the way it's going to be around the country, from preschool to college. some virtual schooling, some in-person. the question is, how do you have kids come to school and be taught en masse in the middle of a pandemic and do it safely for everybody? tom friedman is a former director of the cdc and a former health commissioner of new york city. welcome, tom. so, who got it right, chicago or new york? >> well, fareed, it's not either/or. there are two things every community has to do if it not wants to just open schools, but keep them open. the first is to control covid. if you try opening with lots of covid spread, you're going to have to close schools again. and the second is to take a number of steps to adapt schools to the new reality that we're living in with covid-19. >> so, a lot of schools are trying to do this thing where they will have only 50% of the

student body at any given time. either doing it in shifts or monday, tuesday and thursday, friday. is that the right approach, to kind of reduce the total number to begin with? >> any way we can reduce crowding, reduces the risk of explosive spread. there's still a lot we don't know about covid, but it's clear that children can get the infection. it's rare but some of them can get severely ill. and undoubtedly teenagers and, perhaps, younger kids can spread the infection as well. that means there are tough decisions that need to be made in every school district and in every household. are there vulnerable people at home? are there ways to separate a child who's going to school from those vulnerable people at home? if not, you have to think of what are the risks and benefits of in-person schooling? but we have to be very clear, schools are important. all of us want kids to learn. there is not only too much education being lost, too much

disruption in our economy, but also too much of an exacerbation of what has already been a really big educational gap with poorer kids, black and latinax kids not getting as good an education, not having as much access to distance learning and not having the same possibility to shield themselves from people who have to go to work for essential jobs and have to have contact with others. so, this is something we have to try to get right. we're going to have to learn as we go along. >> but you do believe we have to, in most places, open the schools, be very careful, experiment, there really is no other option? >> well, i wouldn't say it quite like that, fareed, because i think in much or even most of the u.s. right now, there's just too much covid for schools to be safely opened. certainly what governor cuomo has outlined in new york state is an excellent way of thinking about it. you have to be less than 5%

positivity and to have a systematic plan for what to do. that's exactly what's needed. but in places like that have 10%, 15% positivity rates, i would be very surprised if they're able to not only open but stay open because they're going to have outbreaks. >> you're explaining a potentially dangerous scenario because you know a number of those places that have infection rates, positivity rates over 5% are planning to reopen their schools, so you think this could add -- this could look bad because you will see flareups then? >> i think it's almost inevitable that in many if not most of those places you'll see the spread of covid and it's going to be very hard for those schools to reopen. look, you either close your bars or close your schools. but you can't keep them both open. that's very unlikely to be possible. >> can you say something about the cdc guidelines, because basically the cdc issue guidelines about school

reopening and then president trump seems to feel they were too stringent. they then issued new guidelines which were more lax. is the cdc being politically influenced in ways that worry you? >> well, the cdc has certainly been silenced in this pandemic. it's the first time in the nearly 75 years the cdc has existed it hasn't been front and center, making the decisions and explaining to the american people what's going on. and that's a problem. fortunately, there's still great people working at cdc, working hard, following the science, posting good information. they've had 1.6 billion clicks on their website. if you look at the school guidance, there are good, useful tools for schools to use, for parents to use. they give practical guidance for what to do. there was certainly at least one document that was written probably not by someone at cdc. it didn't have anything wrong in it, but it didn't have the full truth in it, which is if you open schools, you do have to be careful about what's going to happen to the teachers, to the

staff, to the community, to the families of kids who go there if there are infection spreads from the school. ignoring that is just going to backfire. >> tom, what have you learned about covid and what strategies are successful when you look around the world, because there is -- to me, its a bit of a puzzle. some countries have done very well where there's little mask wearing. in large parts of europe there's not much mask wearing. there are some places no matter what the rates just seem astonishingly low. taiwan, hong kong, places like that. what conclusions have you drawn? >> it's pretty clear. there's no one answer here. not travel bans, not testing, not contact tracing, not mask wearing, not even a vaccine. we need a comprehensive response. if there's one thing that unifies or a common denominator for all of the successful places, they have been guided by and have fully supported public health. and really you can think of it

as two phases. first, if it's spreading widely, you really do need to have people physically distanced. that means closing all indoor retail, dining, bars, churches, indoor spaces where you can get explosive spread. and second, once it gets down to a more manageable level, you have to do what we call the box-it-in strategy -- test, isolate, contact trace, quarantine. it's not that complicated but it is that hard. because it has to be done very well, very quickly. and i think in this country, we didn't stay shut long enough and we didn't ramp up the box-it-in capacity effectively enough. because of that, we're paying the price. in the past week, people in europe had one-eighth the risk of being killed by covid as people in the united states. and yet there are parts of the u.s., like much of the northeast, which look more like europe in terms of controlling the virus. >> tom friedman, pleasure to

have you on. >> fareed, thanks so much. >> thanks to tom friedman, bill gates and thanks to all of you are being part of this program. i'll see you next week. ♪

♪ we do things differently and aother money managers, don't understand why. because our way works great for us! but not for your clients. that's why we're a fiduciary, obligated to put clients first. so, what do you provide? cookie cutter portfolios? nope. we tailor portfolios to our client's needs. but you do sell investments that earn you high commissions, right? we don't have those. so, what's in it for you?

our fees are structured so we do better when our clients do better. at fisher investments we're clearly different. even if you're on a statin? are you still at risk for a heart attack or stroke? statins may lower some risks, but may not be enough. that's why science delivered vascepa. for people who have persistent cardiovascular risk factors and take a statin only vascepa is clinically proven to provide 25% lower risk from heart attack and stroke. don't take vascepa if you're allergic to icosapent ethyl or any inactive ingredient in vascepa. tell your doctor about any medicines you take, and if you are allergic to fish or shellfish. stop taking vascepa and seek medical help if you have symptoms of an allergic reaction. serious side effects may occur like heart rhythm problems and bleeding. heart rhythm problems may occur in more people with persistent cardiovascular risk or who have had heart rhythm problems. tell your doctor if you have symptoms such as irregular beat, lightheadedness, dizziness, shortness of breath, chest discomfort or fainting. possible side effects include muscle and joint pain. proven by science, fda approved.

vascepa can reduce your risk and add cardio protection. call your doctor about vascepa today. - [narrator] food delivery just got more rewarding, now that grubhub gives you rewards when you order. did you order tacos? again? boom, rewarded. (chewing) (dog barks) ordering dinner for the family? voila, rewarded, with a side of quiet. (baby mumbling) grubhub rewards you. get a free delivery perk when you order. - [group] grubhub. (upbeat music)

new york. we begin this hour with breaking news. the 5 million mark. there now have been at least 5 million cases of coronavirus confirmed in the united states. that total is the highest in the world. this is data compiled by johns hopkins university, data that cnn and other news outlets use to come up