today he doubled down on the idea that he may defy the law. that he may allow or maybe even cause disorder and indeed invite carnage if this election is not to his liking. >> we want to make sure the election is honest and i'm not sure that it can be. i don't know that it can be with this whole situation, unsolicited ballots. they're unsolicited. >> he says the word honest. but i do not think he knows what that word means not just from his own behavior but what he is talking about with voting. we have no reason for suspicion that mail-in ballots are any less safe than any other kind of voting. now, the republican controlled senate in the face of this statement by him, this incendiary, toxic statement by a president of their party, what do they do?

they unanimously passed a resolution today to state the obvious. that the republican senate is committed to the orderly and peaceful transition of power called for by the constitution. you know, that's your job. your job is also to correct the corrosive crap coming out of trump's mouth. that's your job. that's your oath. republican senators, republican members of congress, this is a moment that will be remembered for a long time. you know your districts. you know your states. you know they offer mail-in ballots routinely. you know you have protections and procedures that make fraud statistically irrelevant. that make it better again, often better than in-person voting. literally, nine ballots that we'll talk about more with our first guest came up, seven for

trump. they were flagged. maybe they were mishandled. this he had to be corrected. and now this scandal? how can these republicans say nothing to defend our democracy? you refuse to come on the show. other shows. you pretend you didn't hear the president. you allow the doj, the department of justice, to be a run away, partisan apparatus, trump's private investigator. know this. you are trump's, too. what you ignore, you empower. and nothing that is happening will be forgotten. you will never erase what you said and did during this time and what you failed to say and do. no one can miss it. you are complicit. thankfully, trump's own fbi director said today, there is no

evidence of a national voter fraud effort by mail. remember, trump put together a commission to explore his 2016 win. those voter fraud theories that he had. that commission had to be disbanded because they found nothing. do you know how rarely that happens? now he knows he could lose and that's why he is concocting nonsense to sow fear about this vote. why is he scared? scenes like today. that's the real public. no maga manipulated rally. no safe space of adoring fans willing to risk their health to pack themselves in to make you feel good. that didn't feel good i'm sure. he was visiting the casket of rbg and i'm sure that made him

most mournful. but know this. this president is trying to set us up for trouble. not just lying about our process, a process he did almost nothing to secure from the russians and other interference. but now he wants you to think he's concerned about its safety and security. he's concerned about nothing other than his own fate. now, here are the unanswered questions. is the trump campaign making moves on state legislators to steal electors and flat out ignore or bypass the popular vote if he doesn't like it? there is toxic talk and it is a warning. >> let them send it in and let them go vote. it is going to be the greatest fraud ever. the democrats are trying to rig this election. i think it is going to be a rigged election.

>> he is using campaign apparatus. the question is what is it doing? is it really reaching into all these aspects of the election we're going to talk about tonight, exhibit a in texas, trump's allies created one set of rules for older voters more likely to back the president while making it tougher for everyone else. in florida, the voters said they wanted ex-felons to have the right to vote. people voted that's what they wanted. republicans in the state legislature said no. trump has made it harder for americans who are overseas including the military to vote. now all of this is before you get to the fact that going to a poll on election day, let's be honest, depending where you live and more and more places in this country it could mean putting yourself at risk. so the necessity for a safe way to vote makes a way we already have even more attractive and important -- voting by mail. so trump has been after these

ballots. why? because the less turn out the better for him. he doesn't want that scene at rbg's memorial to become a reflection of the population of this country. the majority of this country. not a silent majority but a majority he is very interested in silencing. he has no proof that mail-in ballots are a problem, and yet he had his hand picked post master general starting manipulation of the one government service that's in the constitution, the u.s. post office, so much so that federal judges on both coasts had to force the post office to do more to allow for better voting. even just requesting an application from a trump campaign office in some places means it comes wrapped in the president's campaign propaganda. you know what? i'm okay with that. i'm worried about the other

things. if you can get a ballot at all, that's the real problem. trump and his allies are done purging voter rolls. once that happens, now let's see. who's been thrown off wrongfully? all the appeals will never be done in time for any election. how many requests are being rejected for a technicality? and there is the question of who's on your ballot? we've seen republicans trying to help everybody from the green party to kanye west get on ballots in the hopes that votes will be siphoned off from joe biden. once you make your choice, there is the question of getting it mailed back in time, whether it's ohio republicans rejecting a request to use money they already have to prepay return postage on absentee ballots, and like i said, you have judges ordering the usps to prioritize ballots and prepay over time. prepare for this. the trump campaign has fought

against giving you other options as well, like more secure drop boxes. why would you want fewer places for people to exercise the franchise of their vote? why would potus claim that speed is more important than accuracy? >> i also don't want to wait three months and then find out the ballots are all missing and the election doesn't mean anything. >> where does that hypothetical come from? wait three months? when has that ever happened? then find out the ballots are all missing? when did that ever happen? why is his campaign fighting to keep states from getting a jump on counting? if you want it to be done, in a reasonable amount of time, as soon as possible, we all do, why are you fighting against that? at the same time, trying to make sure that any vote post marked by election day but shows up late, you know, if the usps doesn't get it right what you do

when you're damnedest to make sure it is more likely than not those have to be tossed out. the need for an accurate count is going to matter more than ever this year. already three key primary states -- wisconsin, pennsylvania, michigan -- the number of ballots rejected in this year's primary process is almost the same as trump's margin of victory in 2016. i wonder why. it's a big part of why many of you don't want to risk it, right? god forbid you go through the trouble of getting a ballot and in an election where everybody is so passionate out there and then they don't count it. we know from states that are already doing early voting many of you say i still got to vote in person. i have to make sure it counts. on what day? trump has already tried and failed to delay the actual election day. remember that? maybe we should wait. why wouldn't we do it sooner?

he didn't like that idea. he wanted to buy time. that is why he advocated for open voter intimidation in the form of armed guards stationed at the polls. no chilling effect there. all of this is before you get to the millions of dollars his campaign has spent on stand by or has money on stand by to fuel an army of lawyers and on stand by to contest the results in any state they think will help them. or his flat out acknowledgment that this is why he's racing to lock in his conservative, super majority on the supreme court. listen to him. >> it's a scam, a hoax. everybody knows that. so you'll need nine justices up there. i think it is going to be very important. >> he is now allowing his people closer to the russians than he did in 2016. remember, then the russians were reaching out to the nobodies.

coffee boy. george p that sounded massive warning in our government. now we got this guy whose trump's own treasury department calls a russian intelligence officer feeding not just trumpers but maybe his own lawyer rudy guiliani propaganda. the same propaganda that shows up in the president's own twitter feed. the scariest part is he seems to have convinced rudy guiliani he's legit. >> you know our government sees andre derkosh as a guy who should not be respected or trusted. they think he is an operative for the rugs. >> that's okay. they can see him that way. he is not. >> so our intelligence apparatus is wrong and rudy is right. no big deal. because the trump campaign doesn't care how it wins.

they don't care that they're recycling stuff from somebody known to be a russian propagandaist and it happens to be the same kind of propaganda they're putting out through their troll farms and other ways to smear bind. no coincidence. why? because they want to get to the same place. why didn't they care about russia in 2016? why don't they care about foreign interference? why did he tell you he would take dirt on an opponent from anybody? because that is his reality. rules are for fools. the motto of his life. not only is the president getting help from the russians he is actively helping them hurt us. personally spreading their propaganda and saying stuff like this. >> you won't know the election result for weeks, months, maybe years after. maybe you'll never know the election result. >> his own fbi just yesterday warned he shouldn't say things

like that because that's what our enemies want us to think about our own democracy. wrap your head around that. the fbi warning the president. mr. president, you are saying what our enemies are trying to plant in people's heads. welcome to today. a nation that has depended on the leaders at the top to keep us safe. now must those same leaders the most. it is once again left to us. we the people. a free media to safeguard our rights. and to be vigilant. to speak truth to power. that is the oebl only way we will form a more perfect union. that notion is no longer quaint. it has never mattered more than it does right now. i want to show you something. a reminder of who we really are and what this country is supposed to be about.

we are not an autocracy. the flag you are waving should not be a trump flag. it should be an american flag. this is not a bind flag or trump flag. this is not going to be their country. it is our country. what we want no matter who wins is a peaceful transfer of power if one needs to come to pass. example of what we're supposed to be. george h.w. bush loses to clinton. ugly race. okay? a lot of you may not remember it the way the older of us do, but what did he do in '92? he didn't throw a tantrum. he didn't question the legitimacy of the results. i guarantee they weren't perfect. he didn't refuse to leave. bush left a beautiful letter for his successor on the day of the power transfer that said in part, you will be our president when you read this note. he underlined our. it goes on, i wish you well. i wish your family well. your success is now our country's success. i am rooting hard for you. good luck.

george. am i lionizing george bush? no. that is the way a leader is supposed to act because what leaders say matters. there is actual cause for concern when it comes to some ballots and one of the most critical battlegrounds. this isn't about hiding from reality. we want to expose reality, expose the problems. they just have to be real. here is what i want to start with tonight. the issue is so-called naked ballots. what is but they send you one. the state's attorney general for pennsylvania josh shapiro joins me now. mr. a.g., thank you. >> good to be with you. >> so the context of the concern is not that it was just a handful of ballots, nine ballots, seven of them for trump, so not that widespread. i don't want to exaggerate the context. i want to exaggerate the concern if anything, which is your primary, you had 37,000 rejected

mail-in ballots. the trump margin of victory in 2016 was about 44,000 votes. so every vote in your state counts. you had so many kicked out in 2020 why should it make the voters there and the people watching all over the country concerned that your process is too easy to screw up? >> yeah. well, chris, first off i think it is important that people take a deep breath and examine the facts here. you kind of conflate two different situations. let's talk about both for a second. in the primary, which was really the first time pennsylvania was doing vote by mail, many other states had done it earlier, there were certainly some issues with counties having to learn the process and figure out exactly how the ballot issue and the mailing issue is to work. let me demonstrate. it is actually pretty simple the way it works. >> go ahead. >> it is not controversial at all. here is a ballot. this is what someone at home is going to get in order to vote in

the general election. you choose your candidates. you fold it up. you stick it in the secrecy envelope. that's the second ballot or the second envelope. and the final envelope is the envelope you use to mail it back. you sign the back of it and you send it to your local county election officer. why does the secrecy ballot matter? because our votes are secret. we want to make sure the voter that votes from home whether from covid or whatever reason has their ballot be secret when it goes back. this is really just a matter of educating our voters in pennsylvania about how to do this process. now, you raised another issue about what happened with those seven or eight or nine ballots in northeastern pennsylvania. first and foremost again. let's take a deep breath and look at this. this is a matter about ballots from the primary not from this

general. i for one am comforted and i think the people of pennsylvania and across this country should be comforted in knowing law enforcement is looking into it. that we're doing our jobs together. federal, state, and local partners trying to examine what the issue is. i think you'll hear more from the united states attorney as to what really was going on there. there is a big difference between clerical issues and criminal matters. the problem we have right now and you alluded to this at the outset is that we're at this fever pitch because the leader of our country is trying to create chaos and sow doubt right here in pennsylvania. chris, there is a strategic reason for the president doing this. he is trying to make people feel powerless. >> absolutely. that's why we got to jump on the situation, mr. a.g. you said clerical is not the same as criminal. 100% right. these ballots are about hold overs from the primary. hundred percent right. i did not mean to suggest they are about the general election. thank you for the clarification.

so which was it? was this a nefarious problem or a paperwork problem you're looking at with these ballots? >> i think ul a he hear more from the u.s. attorney on that. i'm not going to get ahead of him. what i am going to say is this is what law enforcement is supposed to do is carefully look at a situation and ultimately provide facts to people that they can rely on and trust. the problem we have right now is a president that's creating this chaos and making it hard for people to trust. again, as i was saying a moment ago the chaos he's creating is designed to make you feel powerless yet in this country, chris, when it comes to election time the people have the power not the president. the people are the ones who get to go to the polls, vote by mail, and determine the future direction of our democracy. i think what's important is that we try to drown out the noise. >> i'm with you. that's why i have you on. >> and focus on doing our jobs. >> that's why i have you on mr.

a.g. if i just wanted the speculation game i wouldn't need you. i want to be clear about what you're looking at in your state. >> yeah. >> when the d.o.j. says it is investigating potential issues with mail-in ballots being in pennsylvania and that they revealed several were marked for trump, nine ballots, seven for trump, are they looking at ballots from the primary or the general? >> the issue of the handful of ballots in lucerne county are ballots from the primary according to the u.s. attorney. has nothing to do with the general election. >> why are they looking at them now? >> you know, i think that is a question that needs to be directed to the u.s. attorney or doj. >> what do you think it is seeing how i got you here. take a deep breath and tell me why you think that is. >> look, i'm not going to speculate on what the u.s. attorney will find. here is what i will say more broadly about the doj and the president. it is highly reckless i believe

to inject speculation and inject fear in people's minds on any investigation. i certainly know this as the attorney general. but particularly when it comes time to voting. a personal and special and, you know, unique experience that every american has that they want to be able to know that they can trust this process and doj has to be a part of helping alleviate those concerns as i believe the u.s. attorney is trying to do. get to the bottom of these issues and focus on the power that the people have to choose the direction of this country by choosing its leaders. >> i'm with you. obviously why does it matter? pennsylvania matters. it matters everywhere but 538 projects a 31% chance yours will be the state that serves as the tipping point of this election. so extra attention. i appreciate you coming on to discuss this as the top law

enforcement official in your state during this important time. mr. a.g., thank you very much. >> good to be with you. >> all right. be well. all right. so what did we learn there? look, you got to press. you got to ask the questions. take a deep breath before you do it. it is not about panic. it's about poise and persistance. they're looking at ballots from the primary? why is it being fed to us as if they're having problems with the general election vote? isn't that the way it came across? he says no. squares with what the actual facts are. got to stay on top of this stuff, and we will. with trump and co forging ahead with the supreme court election 40 days before the election democrats are raising hell but trump says they should take blame for changing the rules in the senate years ago. you will rue the day. go ahead. >> who is harry reid who made this all possible. thank you very much, harry. i hope you're enjoying your evening. >> what does harry reid think

about that description of the nuclear option? did that pave the way for this? let's ask him about where we are, why we're here, and the concerns of the last senate majority leader next. (vo) businesses are always making choices. here's a choice you don't have to make: the largest 5g network... award-winning customer satisfaction... or insanely great value. now, with t-mobile for business, there's no compromise. network. support. value. choose. all. three. t-mobile for business. ready when you are. we'll look back and remember the moment that things, for one strange time in our lives, got very quiet.

some lost work and invented new ways to get by. others were busier than ever, and found strength they never knew they had. we sheltered with the people who matter most, sometimes finding how far apart we'd drifted. we worried over loved ones, over money, over our planet. and over take-out. and we found a voice one the noise out there had kept quiet. when the world starts spinning again, let's remember this time where none of us felt secure, and fight for a future where everyone can. because when the world seems like it's standing still... that's the perfect time for us to change it. i'm a delivery operations manager in san diego, california. we've had a ton of obstacles in finding ways to be more sustainable for a big company.

we were one of the first stations to pilot a fleet of zero emissions electric vehicles. the amazon vans have a decal that says, "shipment zero." we're striving to deliver a package with zero emissions in to the air. i feel really proud of the impact that has on the environment. but we're always striving to be better. i love being outdoors, running in nature. we have two daughters. i want to do everything i can to protect the environment to make sure they see the same beauty i've seen in nature. my goal is to lead projects that affect the world. i know that to be great requires hard work. ...this one's for you. you inspired us to make your humira experience even better... with humira citrate-free. it has the same effectiveness you know and trust,

but we removed the citrate buffers, there's less liquid, and a thinner needle... with less pain immediately following injection. ask your doctor about humira citrate-free. and you can use your co-pay card to pay as little as $5 a month. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections,... ...including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened,... ...as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems,... ...serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common... and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections,... or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ask your doctor about humira citrate-free. the same humira you trust with less pain immediately following injection. if you can't afford your medicine, abbvie may be able to help.

obama, biden, schumer, pelosi, all the democratic leaders were used to hearing the president attack. well, tonight trump redirected his aim banking another democrat, former senate majority leader senator harry reid for making his life easier. listen to this. >> but they want to pack the court. you know what that means? they want to put on a lot of justices. these are things that are just horrible. i guess we could do that, too, right? we could do that, too. but remember, it was harry reid that made this all possible.

you know, they're angry at us. listen, chuck, crying chuck. you know what crying chuck is? chuck. every time you complain, remember it was harry reid, your person in charge. he had your job before. it was harry reid who made this all possible. thank you very much, harry. i hope you're enjoying your evening. >> now, of course, he is not going to get it exactly right but for context of history in 2013 reid and other democrats voted to change eliminati 60 vo threshold for executive branch and judiciary appointments. then when mitch mcconnell became senate leader he followed suit with the nuclear option for supreme court nominations. okay? so harry reid didn't create what we have today. the issue is did he open the door to it? mcconnell certainly thought so then and now. he warned harry reid at the

time, you will regret this. this was his follow through in 2016. here to respond to the president's comments and weigh in on much more of importance frankly is former senator harry reid. mr. leader, welcome to "primetime." good to see you. >> good to see you. i enjoyed the first part of your show but what i want to say is this. mail-in ballots go back to the revolutionary war, the civil war, war of 1812. we've been voting by mail back to the days of the revolution, so that's nothing that's new. and i would be happy to respond to any inquiry about changing rules. >> let's deal with where we are first, harry, then we'll go back to how we got here. >> okay. >> we had the president today say again, listen. i don't know about any peaceful transfer of power. let me see how it works out. because the unsolicited ballots, these mail-in ballots, this is a disaster, should never happen. so i got to see what happens first before i know whether or not the democrats steal this. what do you think of that

message? what kind of peril does it impose on us? >> donald trump knows he is going to lose the election fairly. he is behind every poll. this could be a change election. he is going to lose big time. biden will be elected. the margin in the house. we'll take the senate. he knows that. so he is flailing. when in doubt wave your arms, scream, and shout. that is what he is doing. he has no chance whatsoever to be president unless he figures some way to cheat. >> let's take a look backwards. i care about this too much. i know how we got here. i know what your role was and wasn't. if i were more concerned about it i would be jumping on it but what happens here though, harry? think about it. we've never dealt with anything like this before. november 3rd as you know very well, we don't know dispositively who wins on election day, have you to have the counting of the absentees.

if it is a yawning margin in certain states we make a prediction based on the probabilities. but what happens this november 3rd if it's tight and we don't know anything? what happens in the ensuing days maybe weeks? >> i'm not here to boast about mitch mcconnell but i thought his statement today was terrific where he said there is going to be a smooth transition come first of the year. i thought that was commendable for mitch to do that. >> hold on a second. the guy who in 2016 made an impassioned plea that as a matter of principle and duty we cannot seat a supreme court justice because we must not impose on the democratic principles of the people's will, you are now banking on him to do the right thing if the election is a little off? >> i said i appreciate his statement today and i do. what they've done with the supreme court is done everything but tie their arms.

they have, he and the chairman of the judicial committee, it's just terrible what they've done. i can't believe that they are such hypocrites. they both said, lindsey graham and mitch mcconnell, we are not going to have a president choose -- we're not going to have a president who is not in power choose the next supreme court justice. they want to wait till the new election. well, they're still trying to do that even though they're tied up as i said. they don't know what they're talking about. >> you were there. you know, you know the history better than i. mitch mcconnell told you at the time when you removed it for the executive judiciary and judiciary appointments you're going to regret this sooner than you think. in 2016 when that happened did you regret the move you had made earlier? >> absolutely not. let me explain just very

briefly. obama had been elected president. and they set out to do two things. number one he would not be re-elected and anything obama tried to do they would oppose. for example, the first time in history of this country they filibustered the secretary of defense who by the way was a republican chuck hagel. they filibustered everything. we had the d.c. circuit, second most important court in the country, seven vacancies. they wouldn't allow us to fill them. the national labor relations board. they made it so you couldn't even have a meeting there. so obama was in a position where he was trapped and as a result of what we did, what i did, we changed the rules to say that this isn't going to happen anymore. as a result of that we were able to get all of his cabinet offices filled, sub cabinet offices filled, d.c. circuit, we

got that taken care of, and in the process we got the affordable care act passed and the most substantial change in wall street in the history of the country the dodd/frank bill. that's why we did it and i have no regret. it was the right thing to do. by the way, it is not the first time the rules have been changed. they've been changed lots of times but it was time to do it again. >> but what do you make of the allegation that you set the stage for this? and the proof is mcconnell told you without saying it that this is the way it was going to hit if you did it then and now here we are. he needs a simple majority to put people on the court forever. >> what if we hadn't done this? and for anyone that thinks mcconnell wouldn't do what he's doing right now anyway, we got that london bridge not far from las vegas. we'll sell it to you again. >> you think he was going to do it anyway even if you hadn't changed the 60 vote rule. >> of course.

of course. and keep in mind what we got done by changing the rule. obama's presidency is something that will be written about for decades to come as a result of the good things he was able to do and we did it as a result midwife changing the rules. >> do you think if the democrats get into power in the senate they should change the rules again and expand the court or do other things to undo or create advantage? >> well, senator schumer has been very smart in saying everything is on the table. i think everything should be on the table. trump's going to no longer be president. and i think as i've indicated earlier we'll have really a strong margin in the house. we'll have a democratic senate. i think senator biden is going to -- should say president biden will have to make a decision what he wants to do because it would be up to him frankly. >> have you ever felt worse about the way things can go than right now? i'm not talking about

democrat/republican. i'm talking about the nature of where we are as a people. >> chris, i have to tell you i am -- having spent 34 years in congress and even was back there when i was going to law school being a capitol copy can't imagine in my worst dreams or nightmares having anyone like donald trump doing anything he can to denigrate the country. that's what he is doing by his ballot situation, that's what he's doing by denigrating john mccain. you know, john mccain, he is a legend of course. but one thing we always remember about his legislative career, the difference between obama care being knocked out by trump and not being knocked out by trump is john mccain coming to the floor and said, no thanks. they want to get rid of obama

care. why? why? pre-existing conditions. millions of people would have no insurance. what in the world are they thinking? >> what do you say to your former colleague mitch mcconnell? they watch the show a lot. what is your advice for him right now or what is your hope for him? >> my advice to him, he comes from a state that is famous for a lot of great legislators. and his career is not going to be based, shouldn't be based on being a lap dog for donald trump. which i'm sorry to say he has been. and the republican senators, i'm very disappointed. they should stand up to this man. but none of them do. they're afraid of him. and they should not be afraid. i can't, you know, john chaffees of the world, these are republicans who would stand up for the country. the legislative branch of government is equal to the executive branch of government. republican senators should realize that. >> senator harry reid, mr.

leader, thank you for coming on the show. it's good to have you. >> watch every night, chris. thanks. >> you're part of a very exclusive group. harry reid, thank you. we'll be right back. i can't wiae at&t's big 5g news... (shouting through the glass) at&t has nationwide 5g? yup! and that's faster? faster, yea! but is it reliable? ah huh and secure! you should consider making a big deal about it! bigger? i said bigger! oh, big-bigger deal bigger than what i'm doing? it's not complicated. a 5g network needs a 5g device. now everyone including existing customers can get a free samsung galaxy note20 after trade-in. isn't just about being bein the same place.ty it's about having common interests and common goals and a common bond wherever you are. in this time when we need to stay apart to stand together, custom ink has new tools that make it easy to design custom gear and individually ship it to your group members so you can stay connected to the people

and the causes you put your life's work into. together we can overcome any challenge and soon we'll stand together, together again. visit customink.com to get started today. c) - hello world do you see me? though hidden, i am here waiting for the rest of my life to unfold. soon i will arrive. (music) or will i? it's really not up to me. be my campion in the fight for my life. (heart beat)

in the fight for my life. i'm happy to give you the tour, i lohey jay. it. jay? charlotte! oh hi. he helped me set up my watch lists. oh, he's terrific. excellent tennis player. bye-bye. i recognize that voice. annie? yeah! she helped me find the right bonds for my income strategy. you're very popular around here. there's a birthday going on. karl! he took care of my 401k rollover. wow, you call a lot. yeah, well it's my money we're talking about here. joining us for karaoke later? ah, i'd love to, but people get really emotional when i sing. help from a team that will exceed your expectations. ♪

why does the president want the judge? legacy but also leverage. he believes if he gets another conservative on the court it will help him stay in power. listen. >> it's a scam. it's a hoax. everybody knows that. so air going to need nine justices up there. i think this will end up in the supreme court and i think it's very important that we have nine justices. >> ben ginsburg knows about deciding elections in the courts specifically the supreme court. he was a key lawyer for republicans in bush v. gore back

in 2000. counselor, thank you for joining us again. >> thanks for having me, chris. >> let's start with the basic assertion and then go to the poison process. the basic assertion. unsolicited ballots, naked ballots, mail-in ballots, disaster, rife with fraud, can't do it right, democrat hoax and fix. you know that you're a republican. true? >> well, not so true. there is a body of evidence but it's a really small body of evidence that's been collected on fraudulent ballots over the years. and it is far too thin, just isolating cases the gation the assertion that our elections are fraudulent or rigged. >> would you vote by mail-in ballot? >> yes. >> would you recommend others -- >> as does he. as does the president. >> as does the president. and as he is asking people to do so in florida. so help me understand the legal construction here of argument. he says it's, you know, a crap

show right? you can't do it. unless in florida and north carolina, he says, well, those are good governors. the republicans. do you believe that this is a partisan interest? >> no. i've spent a lot of time over the years with state and local election officials and even if the person at the top is somehow elected as a partisan which happens in some states, nonetheless they all take very seriously the duty they have of free and fair election. >> do you think there is bona fide a good faith basis for the president's conjecture or do you think this is as naked a political malice move as it smells? >> it depends on the conjecture. part of what he is saying about universal ballots, which nevada and new jersey just put into play this year as soon as their legislature turned democratic, i think he's got a case about how that is sort of a naked power play. nevada is the state he cares

about. >> right. >> when it comes to talking about the results overall, being fraudulent or rigged, that seems to me to be a political theory that he is trying to unveil but it still isn't clear what the end game is. how that actually ends up working. >> look, in pennsylvania there is all the hub bub about the feds investigating the ballots. they're primary ballots not general election ballots. we just had the a.g. on the show. that is a little bit of a misdirection play. the end game seems to be what he just said. let's take him at his word. just for argument's sake, that he wants to get his own judge on there so if it goes to the supreme court there is a better chance he wins. do you like that kind of suggestion about the supreme court? >> no, and i think a couple things. first of all it puts republican senators who today repudiated the notion that you shouldn't have a peaceful transfer of power into a position of then voting for the ninth justice. the president also said today

was an integral part of whatever his plan is going to be for the election. so i think that that turns out bad. >> i think if it is going to have an implication isn't there a concern that without rbg on the court that you will have different outcomes in voter suppression cases? >> well, i'm not sure that's true. remember, it is still now a 5-3 republican majority. i understand the president is upset with the chief justice for some votes he made on nonelection cases but it is still a republican majority, 5-3. the other thing is, before the president thinks that just by appointing his justice and additional justices to the republican majority, remember that he went in asking for absolute immunity against a

subpoena from the new york city da and lost that case 9-0. i'm not sure that the justices whether republican or democrat aren't going to call balls and strikes on any case. >> hum. that was a real meatball though in terms of balls and strikes analogy. ben ginsburg thank you very much for putting your mind to what matters. appreciate you. the best to you and your family. >> thank you, chris. you too. >> okay. we'll be right back. your bank can be virtually any place. so, when you get a check... you can deposit it from here. and you can see your transactions and check your balance from here. you can save for an emergency from here. or pay bills from here. so when someone asks you, "where's your bank?" you can tell them: here's my bank. or here's my bank. or, here's my bank. because if you download and use the chase mobile app, your bank is virtually any place. visit chase.com/mobile.

"could have been me" hey mercedes? ♪ - hello world do you see me? though hidden, i am here

waiting for the rest of my life to unfold. soon i will arrive. (music) or will i? it's really not up to me. be my campion in the fight for my life. (heart beat)

. . . to put on me about having hiv isn't gonna fit. that's for sure. my name is zach and i'm on biktarvy. biktarvy is a complete, one-pill, once-a-day treatment . . . . . . used for hiv in certain adults. it's not a cure but with one small . . . . . . pill, biktarvy fights hiv . . . . . . to help you get to and stay undetectable. that's when the amount of virus is so low it cannot be measured by a lab test. serious side effects can occur, including kidney problems and kidney failure. rare, life-threatening side effects include a build-up of lactic acid and liver problems. do not take biktarvy if you take dofetilide or rifampin. tell your doctor about all the medicines and supplements you take, if you are pregnant or breastfeeding . . . . . . or if you have kidney or liver problems, including hepatitis. if you have hepatitis b, do not stop taking biktarvy without talking to your doctor. common side effects were diarrhea, nausea, and headache.

if you're living with hiv . . . . . . keep loving who you are. and ask your doctor if biktarvy is right for you. did you hear what the president said about the fda's push for tougher vaccine standards? listen. >> well, i'll tell you what, we're looking at that. that has to be approved by the white house. we may or may not approve it. that sounds like a political move. i think that was a political move, more than anything else. >> first of all, how do you feel about him having say over whether or not things are tested safely or not by the fda? putting that to the side, what he's talking about in no small irony is the fda considering more safety guidelines because, remember, put it through the processer of what's good for me, what's good for me, what's good for me.

he doesn't want more because more means more time. a source says that the guidelines would likely require companies to wait two months after giving test subjects the second dose of the vaccine that you need to do to test it before they can apply for the emergency use approval. remember, emergency use approval is already a shortcut. that would, of course, dash trump's hope for a potential pre-election vaccine, which would be fugazi anyway. because it's not like we're going to have it in time for all of us before the election. it's not gonna happen. so what does he do? he claims he can override the fda, claims they're playing politics. what does the fda chief say about it? this. >> our experts who know about vaccines will make this determination, and it will be only based on the science and the data, not politics. that's my pledge. >> let's bring in top public health expert dr. leana wen. good to see you, doc. >> good to see you, too, chris. >> is the fda right or can the president say, speed it up,

jack? and he'll say, yes, boss. >> you know, actually, the president and hhs, they do have authority over the fda. so it could be done. it would be unprecedented, but it's possible. then we have to think about the consequence of what would happen. what if the fda says, we're not ready to give emergency use authorization, but the president says let's do it anyway. who is going to take this vaccine? you know, i'm in the group that would be eligible to get this under the emergency use authorization as a front line provider. but i don't know other doctors and nurses who would say, sure, the fda said no, the president said yes, but i'm going to stick out my arm and get this vaccine. and i'm certainly not going to be recommending the vaccine to my patients unless it's gone through the rigorous process, a process of approval for safety and efficacy. speed should not be the driving factor here and certainly not political expediency. >> all right. so let's talk about two reasons why. the first one matters most because what we're talking about

that can come at the cost of all deliberate speed. unintended consequences, side effects, whatever you want to call it. what can go wrong with a vaccine that even if it's just, you know, a 1 in 100 side effect, it's not one you want out there? >> yeah, so there are some rare but potentially very dangerous side effects. we've seen seen this in the astrazeneca trial where there is this reported reaction of inflammation of the spinal cord. there are some other possible reactions, including potentially if you get covid, you could have a vaccine that can make that -- the disease that you get from coronavirus even worse. now, these are extremely rare, and i don't want to frighten people about it, but this is just to say that's why we need to do the safety tests. if there is a rare reaction, 1 in 1,000, it might sound, well, who cares if it's 1 in 1,000, but if you're giving this to 300 million people then we're talking about 300,000 individuals who were previously healthy who could get that reaction. >> now, there's anotherly

overlay, doc. people's trust. perfect. thank you for the segue. you're one group who can take it, front line clinician. but the people you need to take this are the minority populations because they're getting hit hardest by the disease and they hear that it's being rushed up and now they want to use them as a bunch of guinea position. wh pigs. what could that do to the trust? >> yeah, that's exactly right. these are populations that have already faced many issues before, with discrimination, being experimented on, ethically, legally, i want to be able to tell my patients this has gone through the strict, most scientific approval processes. if that's not done, we're essentially subjecting patients all across the country in an uncontrolled experiment. the single most important thing the fda can do right now is to vow to the american people that they will make all the data and all the science completely transparent and that way scientists who are external to the fda can also review those

data. and i know that i, myself, i want to look at those data before i take the vaccine or recommend it to anyone to take it, too. >> he's thinking me. we've got to think we. dr. lea wena wen, best to the family. thank you very much. >> thank you, chris. >> we'll be right back.

it's open! hey. think you're managing your moderate to severe ulcerative colitis... ...or crohn's disease? - are you ok? - i did. i was there. but i never knew when my symptoms... ...would keep us apart. so, i talked to my doctor and learned...

...humira is for people who still have... ...uc or crohn's symptoms... ...after trying other medications. and humira helps... ...people achieve remission that can last. so you can experience few... ...or no symptoms. humira can lower your ability... ...to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections,... ...including tuberculosis, and cancers,... ...including lymphoma, have happened,... ...as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems,... ...serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to... ...areas where certain... ...fungal infections are common... ...and if you've had tb, hepatitis b,... ...are prone to infections,... ...or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. be there for you, and them. ask your doctor about humira. with humira, remission is possible. if you can't afford your medicine, abbvie may be able to help.

thank you for watching. "cnn tonight" with d. lemon, major star, right now. >> i was listening to your conversation with the doctor and i had andy slavitt on two nights ago and he told me, he said the president can override the fda if he wants to. that's the consequences of an election. he can do it. >> yep. executive branch. it's his agency. >> yeah, but the trust. where would the trust factor be? >> especially in the black and brown communities. >> mm-hmm. >> they're four times more likely to get sick. twice as likely to get hospitalized or die. and you need them to have faith in the vaccine. and why wouldn't they feel like a bunch of guinea pigs if it's all being raced through and all of a sudden they're being asked to take it? it's not good. we have to have trust of our leaders in this society, and he