without the commission fees so you can start investing today, wherever you are - even hanging with your dog. so, what are you waiting for? download now and get your first stock on us. robinhood.

now, the conservative editorial board of the "wall street journal" to those now making the case for the impeachment of donald trump. tonight they published this editorial. in it they lay out the case for trump's ouster. writing about yesterday's events, they say, quote, this was an assault on the constitutional process of transferring power after an election. it was also an assault on the legislature from an executive sworn to uphold the laws of the united states. this goes beyond merely refusing to concede defeat. in our view it crosses a constitutional line mr. trump hasn't previously crossed.

it is impeachable. later they wrote, if mr. trump wants to avoid a second impeachment, his best path would be to take personal responsibility and then resign that. from the conservative "wall street journal." that the editorial that has just come out today, suggesting the president should resign lest he be impeached, saying that there is a case for impeachment. that is something obviously a lot of democrats are looking at. there are reports that nancy pelosi had been trying to reach vice president pence, that he was not returning her call, knowing that it would be about the 25th amendment. so we continue to follow it tomorrow to see whether or not impeachment is something that the democrats are going to be pursuing. obviously that would be something that would have to be done extraordinarily quickly. there's 13 days in the administration left. unclear exactly how the president is going to behave

over these next 13 days. the video that was released a short time ago obviously a very different tone from this president than we have heard. of course it was written by somebody else. it was spoken from a teleprompter and is certainly not reflective of what the president has been saying up until now. we'll continue to see what tone he takes and what other words he speaks tomorrow. the news continues now. i want to hand it over to chris for "cuomo prime time." chris. >> thanks for buying me some time. i appreciate it, anderson. i am chris cuomo. welcome to "prime time." everything is kind of happening in the moment, right? even me and my tie. why? because everything's changing every second, and we have to focus on where we are and where we need to be. here's where things stand. that trump mob that attacked the citadel of our democracy, our capitol, they're being rounded up and charged. it's happening. we're learning more about who they are. they're not getting a pass, at least not yet.

as for who started it, the feds say they're looking into trump himself. now, as a matter of fact, this is obvious. trump whipped up these special people that he loves with lie after lie about the election being stolen and that they must resist. they must show strength and that he would lead them to the capitol to stop them. he incited riot. you see this. it was started with bad intentions, and then a group of them -- not all of them but enough -- went out and did exactly what trump laid out for them to do. and afterwards, in a moment where he had a chance to condemn everything he says he opposes, everything they say they oppose, he told them he loved them, and

he gave them a pass. the people who desecrated our sacred space. nobody has ever done anything like this. have bad things come out of good intentions before, legitimate protests? yes, and that's when they become crimes and riots. but anybody trying to excuse this as just more of the same is as bad as the people in that capitol. and many people fall into that category. trump didn't do this alone. he put the message out there, but he didn't start this fire. he blew on it, and too many retrumplicans, who are still in office, who will remain, have to answer for that. they listened. they looked on, and they did nothing. what you ignore, you empower.

and then there's the echo chamber. people who pose as media, but they're not. they're operatives. they're retrumplicans. they're toxic partisans. they're fringe actors magnified on social media and, in fact, inflated by lazy mainstream media, made relevant. they wanted this. now they're trying to excuse it. they're trying to attack the people who do the job legitimately as if we're the problem after they attacked the capitol. so now, now is a critical point. why? because now trump has people threatening to resign. congress thinking about impeachment. so what happens? not for you. not for the common good. but to obviously save his own skin, he goes bad on the people he says he loved, right? and now says the obvious thing. punishment for lawlessness, the need to unite, respect the new

administration. never mentions biden by name. never congratulates him. never wishes him well. and puts it all together in a new video. i'm not showing it to you. you can see it online. he's reading what someone else wrote for him. and by the way, people will say, oh, you see, he said the right thing. damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. no. no. he's damned for what he did. and the statement he just put out would have been fine a month ago, after the litigation was over in december. you can have due process. but now you're going to get your due because what you have done to us has taken us to a low point. and frankly i don't know how we get out of it. it's easy to break. it's hard to fix. democracy's fragile. we slept on that reality. we're all too complacent. too many people stood by and said, he's just noise. tell that to the people who are hiding for their lives in that

capitol, republican and democrat by the way. belly down. scared out of their wits. one of the lowest moments of my lifetime. and yet on the same day, we saw our potential. those people got up right and left and decided to do something really reasonable. hold it there. and went back into that building and did their job. i don't even know that that was safe. but maybe it was worth the risk because if it had been stalled the way they wanted it to, if they had won, if they had gotten what they wanted, what trump wanted, what trump asked for -- remember this. he wasn't the one in the capitoldy stroiicapitol destroying it, but that was what he wanted done. he asked for it. what else do you need? how do you stand by someone like that? and if you are one of the people who went in there and think you did it for him, he just threw you under the bus too, just like

mike pence. why? because it's about him, and he has forsaken the rest of us. but those people in the ugliest moment, they showed america at our best. now, look, it didn't hold. they went back in there and you had retrumplicans literally after an insurrection, people coming for their ass, continue to lie about a fraud just for gain. it's not perfect. nothing is. but here is the real deal. he was pushing people for the moment that was made yesterday for weeks. and it was obvious, and it was obviously ignored by retrumplicans. but it was clear to the man who will take over, the president-elect. listen. >> i wish we could say we couldn't see it coming, but that isn't true. we could see it coming. the past four years, we've had a president who has made his

contempt for our democracy, our constitution, the rule of law clear in everything he has done. he unleashed an all-out assault on our institutions of our democracy from the outset. and yesterday was but the culmination of that unrelenting attack. >> the president-elect is right, and hopefully there's a lesson in this even for him to understand the power of words maybe better than he did before and also for him to understand how big the task is that he has in front of him. this is going to be hard. saying unite doesn't make people unite. this is going to be tricky because so many people have been lied to and convinced to invest in an anger that's not going to be easy to quell. so let's try to just not focus on just trump, trump, trump and what's going to happen to trump. i don't think anything's going to happen to trump, all right? we'll discuss it tonight. but i think it's about what remains. now you see people around him.

some are resigning, saying it's because of this. cnn just learned that betsy devos, the education secretary, is resigning. i don't know about you, but my feeling is so what? it's not just too little, too late. but you don't get to look good after you've stood by for so much bad, especially devos. you went in there and tried to make educating kids harder, not easier. why? you're going to have to ask her. i can tell you what's obvious from the outside. trump has been about us and them and dividing people in his own country along the wrong lines. so she's out. other ones are going to resign. so what? i actually think it's the wrong thing to do. i think you should stay. why? because at least you'd have the decency to try to give the new administration the best running start it can have. this has been delayed too long

as it is. it's going to be hard to come into these agencies. you know, the head leaves, devos leaves, i'm sure a lot of her staff are going to go too. so who's going to help people figure out how things work in that agency when they're new? why don't you have the decency to stay? the statement means nothing. you have no high ground. why don't you just stay and help the next people? that's really the best gesture you could do. but you make up your mind on that for yourself. but here's what i will say. devos can leave. the other ones, they can leave. that doesn't mean they should disappear. this matters beyond trump. he didn't do this alone, and he shouldn't be under fire alone. our democracy almost collapsed yesterday. that's not hyperbole. what if they had gone in there with weapons, god forbid? god forbid. we should not leave it up to grace to get ourselves out of situations of our own making.

lawmakers. i don't want to say it, but you have to say it. we could have lost people. a female rioter is dead, a veteran. three others. the threat remains. the bad feelings, the bad practices don't go away because trump will soon be gone. these crazy fringe groups remain rabid, and so do the retrumplicans who torched old glory and pledged allegiance to the maga flag. remember, even after the insurrection, yes, they went back into the building, but they lied again. and you must know who they are, and you must not let them try to pretend to be anything else, ever. ted cruz, josh hawley, astute legal minds trying to think that you are stupid enough to believe that something happened that they can't show any proof of. that's where we need to be focused. not on trump. he's gone. and now i'm going to bring in

senator amy klobuchar. she was there in minnesota. she was involved in a really powerful moment early in the morning that we got to see, and you may have missed because it was really early in the morning. but we watched it. but, senator, i appreciate what you did last night. i really -- i don't like what happened once you guys got back in there, but the decision to go back into the capitol when i don't even know that we had any reasonable assurances that it was safe -- i mean we were finding out about explosive devices when you guys had already decided to go back in. why did it matter so much to you guys to go back in last night after what had happened? >> because we could not let the domestic terrorists win. we could not let an angry, violent mob run our government, walk in there and think they could just stop everything in its tracks. and i know especially senator schumer felt so strongly about

this. that's the incoming majority leader of the united states senate as really did all the leaders. and it was a unified belief that we must go back in there. so we pushed -- really pushed the envelope so we could get back in there, so the american public could see despite the horrific day we'd been through, that we were in there doing our jobs. and it's really two things. it's one that you go back in there and take your rightful place. but secondly, we had to finish the job of declaring to the country that, in fact, joe biden and kamala harris won that election. and there were people, as you point out, i was the one that took on ted cruz right before the capitol security had been breached. and he was actually boasting about the fact in his argument that 30%, 40% of the public actually didn't trust the election. and i took it directly on and said, why do you think they don't trust the election? it was the exact chris cuomo argument, the argument you've been making for months, that you haven't been putting your head down and ignoring this and saying nothing can happen.

we saw what happened, and it's because of the rhetoric, and they know better. and those were my words right before this started, including it's a republic if we can keep it, quoting some words that were at one point attributed to benjamin franklin. and it turned out to be a very good indicator of what was going to happen later in the night. >> yeah. monarchy or a republic. a republic if you can keep it. dr. franklin said. so you were at opposite ends of the spectrum last night. at the end, do we have the moment with the senator and the vice president? okay. so, senator, obviously you know it because you lived it. but at the end of the proceedings, i want people to see what transpired between you and the vice president, mike pence. [ applause ] there's senator klobuchar. there's mike pence. they're talking right now. and now klobuchar tries to punch

him in the face and misses and winds up hitting in the fist. no. you fist-bumped vice president mike pence. why, and what did that mean to you? >> look, what i was saying, i disagree with so many things he'd done, including as you were saying standing with this president. but the point is at this moment, he was willing to read the results and declare joe biden and kamala harris were the president and vice president of the united states starting january 20th. i thought that was significant because as you know, we have a huge party of the country, thanks to donald trump and his enablers, who don't actually believe that this has happened, they don't believe that they won the election. so i thought the fact that pence stood up, as well as my republican colleagues who voted with us, 93 senators rejected these scurrilous claims and baseless objections together and spent the whole day together, including by the way the moment when joe biden gave remarks, and this hasn't been widely reported. and we were all shoved together

in a room, and the minute joe biden came on, silence came over the room. the entire senate watched his speech with respect and clapped at the end. that happened, chris. so to me, these were moments that i will never forget, including at 3:30 in the morning when the only senators left were senator blunt and myself as the head of the rules committee and then the vice president, and we walked over with those remaining ballot boxes after josh hawley's ridiculous objection in pennsylvania had been outvoted, and we walked over to the house and were greeted by speaker pelosi, and we then finished the reading of the roll call, did our job, and declared the winner of the 2020 election. so as horrible as the day was, that moment was the moment you cherish for our democracy. democracy prevailed. >> look, you took an amazing risk, and i think the reward is there because if you had not done it, if had been deemed not

safe or whatever, it would have really been an incentive to the wrong kinds of people. one other thing, and then i'm going to let you go, senator. again, you have my thanks as a citizen, all of you for going back into that room. i don't know that i would have had the bravery to do it after something like that, so i thank you. >> but, chris, could i just also mention there was staff that had the presence to save the ballot boxes. they would have destroyed the boxes that contained the actual ballots the electors from each state would have been destroyed by those criminals that came in. the staff saved them and the line police officers, despite all the investigation we're going to have to undertake on the lack of preparation, everything went wrong. there were police officers -- that was the only reason we were able to go back there is because of people putting their lives at risk and some of them severely injured as you know. >> fair point. and everything that happened yesterday, you can't put everybody in the same bucket in any regard. but just one more thing. trump is gone. he leaves. and now it looks like he was scared enough into submission. good. but it's what remains. hawley and cruz, after the

insurrecti insurrection, stuck by an indefensible position that was done out of pure animus and self-interest, and it's dangerous, and they know it. and you have over 130 people just like them in the house. this isn't civil disagreement. this isn't a policy disagreement. these are people who willingly stood up and lied on the record after an insurrection. how do you work with people like that? >> there's going to be a reckoning, and i will tell you that there are a whole lot of republicans that cannot stand what these guys did, including conservative republicans. they know that what they did here, they did it for their own she short-term destiny is what i called it last night. i talked about the fact people aren't going to remember who we were 100 years from now. they're not going to remember who we were maybe 50 years from now, but they're going to remember what we did last night. and our job as u.s. senators is to not put our own short-term

destiny out front. it's to put democracy's destiny out front. and basically people answered the call made by many leaders in congress, and they literally rebuked them in front of the country. no matter how many fists josh hawley put up in the air to those insurrectionists, that will not be forgotten now because the nation has seen what happens when you not just enable donald trump, but you decide to use it for your own personal gain. i think they're going to have to have a major problem. they will have major problems in or own party and they're also going to have issues in their own states. >> i will never forget, and i hope the country learns a lesson from it and things are insisted upon to change. but senator klobuchar, you have my thanks for what you and all the others and the staff and the people who kept you safe, thank you for putting us first. >> thanks, chris. >> god bless and be well. so what is this reckoning?

what is the accountability? trump incited a riot. he applauded it afterwards. he told the people who performed in it that he loved them. does he get charged for insurrection that he inspired? is it seditious conspiracy? the feds aren't ruling it out. let's walk through the possibilities on the legal side but also a flavor of the political practicality. former deputy fbi director andrew mccabe knows the law cold, and he understands the dynamic as well, next. did you know you can go to libertymutual.com

to customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need? really? i didn't-- aah! ok. i'm on vibrate. aaah! only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪

you work hard for your money. stretched days for it. juggled life for it. took charge for it. so care for it. look after it. invest with the expertise of j.p. morgan, either with an advisor or online, through chase. after all, it's yours. chase. make more of what's yours.

we have a lot of information under the category of what happens next. inside the white house, the dam has finally broken. trump apparently has finally gone too far. they're running for the exits in the white house tonight. we told you a moment ago that cnn has learned that education secretary betsy devos just quit, supposedly over trump's response to the attempted coup at the capitol. just moments ago, cnn confirmed that the assistant secretary for health and human services just resigned. her name is eleanor mccance-katz. she says that she had planned to stay, but now she says, quote, i cannot support language that results in incitement of

violence and risks our very existence. so now we're at two cabinet members gone along with several white house staffers, including stephanie graham. now -- sorry. stephanie grisham. now, there is no question that these matter. they show the level of disrepair around trump. they show what he has wrought. they show why he may be remembered as the worst. why do i say may and not must or will? because it's up to you. it's up to history. it's up to those who make up a reckoning about it. but there's absolutely evidence of that. my point is there's also a "so what" factor to this. i do not believe that these people receive a grace for what they're doing now. i don't think it's high ground. i really believe the more responsible thing, with everything you stayed for, everything you stayed for, this was too much because it was too dangerous. really? but the kids in cages, no?

no? the demonizing people because they're different, no? no? the mocking the integirity of al our institutions? the unmitigated law to lie about everything? that wasn't enough. then you had some sense of higher duty. then it was mitigated. then it was about the media. but now it's too much. with weeks to go and your absence will actually create a vacuum of responsibility that will actually hinder the new administration. i do not think these people should be applauded. i do think that it is a reflection of the destruction that trump creates. he is an inverse midas. everything he touches turns to something far less valuable than gold. will there be legal consequences for him once again and maybe more severely than ever? andrew mccabe is with us. thank you, brother. thank you for the patience.

but these are days where we must be on record about why things matter and why they don't because it will be remembered. we have never been here before. and a question that you have never been asked before. inciting riot, seditious conspiracy as opposed to sedition because it gets complicated legally, what is the exposure for this president for what he absolutely encouraged and helped direct yesterday? >> well, chris, we're going to find out the answer to that question. so first, of course, we need a full-scope, intensive, well-resourced investigation into this president's conduct. now, i said that four years ago. i made the decision to go forward with that. we all know what happened with that one. this needs to happen again. i am not the prognosticator. i am the investigator. and i can tell you it's time to start investigating.

once that takes place -- and i'm talking about sitting down with -- dragging every single person in the white house who heard what he said yesterday, who observed his reactions to what he saw as he watched it from the comfort of the oval office all day long. pull every one of those people into the grand jury and force them to provide testimony and evidence against the president of the united states. collect the record of all of his tweets and his comments on social media exhorting people to come to d.c. for this purpose. then of course his speech in front of that crowd before they left, promising them that he would go with them to the capitol. >> mm-hmm. >> you put that package all together and you deliver it to an attorney general, not just any attorney general, a smart, fair, politically independent attorney general, which we have not had lately but we will have in the new administration with merrick garland. and you let the attorney general decide it. if there's a case there to be

brought, that attorney general should bring that case. >> but there's another step, and we've heard president-elect joe biden say, i don't think that trump should be investigated after this. why? well, the obvious political exigency is get him gone. and it's not easy to get a sitting president for anything. we saw that. you saw it all too well. and this is no easy case either. as obvious as it is, the context matters. and bringing a prosecution does have a discretionary element as well. what about that pushback, that is it worth it? you may not get him, and, you know, if it comes to a vote in congress, it's not going to happen. so what is the value? >> you know, we've had a really vigorous debate about that up until this point. i've had it with you right here on this show and preet and other people. it's been interesting, right? there is that argument that says you let the professional prosecutors decide, and if there's a case that needs to be brought, you let them bring it. and on the other hand, the

political reality of what the new president will face is you say, well, maybe president-elect biden wants to turn the page on this period, wants to put it all behind us and bring the country back together. those are both compelling arguments. that was before yesterday. now we have a sitting president who very likely may have participated in a conspiracy, a seditious conspiracy, exhorted and directed an attack on our government, an attack on the capitol in which lives were lost and the capitol was ransacked. i think that changes the terms of this debate considerably. i think it has to be investigated. and if there is a case to be brought and the attorney general makes that decision, it should go forward. >> does the tape that he put out today saying there should be punishment, if you broke the law, you don't represent the country, does that mitigate his exposure? >> no. no. it's such an obviously self-serving and false statement on his behalf. he makes all kinds of claims in

there about things that didn't actually happen, about his immediate deployment of the national guard, which we know didn't happen. so i don't think that helps him at all. it certainly doesn't undo all of the other statements, the social media posts, the speech to the crowd that morning. you can't unring that bell. >> andrew mccabe, thank you very much. appreciate it. so how do you look at exposure? now, before you start tearing me up about not seeing the obvious exposure for the president, it's about the interest of justice. and what about the people's interest in more exposure to trump toxifying our culture in the middle of a pandemic any longer than necessary? that's got to be part of the discretion here also for prosecutors if it even comes to that. we'll watch it. i promise you that. now, who else? trump lieutenants hawley and cruz, don't they have blood on their hands for this insurrection? certainly senator hawley's hometown paper thought so, said

so in an editorial. and what does it mean for that party, the grand old party? what does it do with trump now? we're going to take it to a capitol hill veteran, warning his party to stand up or be destroyed by trump. former senator jeff flake, next. these folks, they don't have time to go to the post office they have businesses to grow customers to care for lives to get home to they use stamps.com print discounted postage for any letter any package any time right from your computer all the services of the post office plus ups only cheaper get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and never go to the post office again.

trump inspired the siege on our capitol, period. but he did not cause this trouble alone.

147 retrumplicans still went on to object to biden's electoral vote on no good-faith basis. they chose to lie and do exactly what fomented the attack that preceded their decision to do that. so where was the courage when it counted? former republican senator jeff flake joins me now. welcome back to "prime time." good to see you, senator. >> good to see you. >> so what is the message to your party about what remains? trump will be gone. he seems to have been scared into submission. but hawley, flake, legal experting -- not flake. cruz. you're like, what did i do? >> thank you. >> cruz and hawley standing up and making an argument they know has no substance to it right after people broke into the capitol, fomented by exactly that kind of talk. what happens to them? what do you say to them? >> well, part of being a leader, part of being an elected

representative is to -- obviously you have to follow your constituents in order to be elected, to be where they are. but being a leader is to when your constituents are wrong, to tell them they're wrong and to amplify and to forward what the president's misinformation about widespread voter fraud, for example, and then claim that they had to introduce these measures on capitol hill because the voters believed that something was wrong, fulfilling their own prophecy. that's just wrong, and i don't think it will be -- i don't think it will hold up well, particularly after what happened yesterday. whatever good the president may have done on taxes or regulation, i think will be forgotten a lot sooner than what happened yesterday. >> how do you think trump should be remembered? >> well, as one who i think aspired to be an authoritarian frankly. when you look at the last month, if nothing else, you know,

frankly for me, it started long before that with helsinki and agreeing with putin over his own intelligence agencies. but, boy, this last month, basically saying that he would not accept an election that he did not win, that's not the language of a small "d" democrat. and so i think that he won't be remembered well, and i think yesterday was an awful coda on this entire administration and this last four years. >> isn't yesterday what it's all about? wasn't that inevitable? and in fairness to you, you were out front on this and paid a price for it politically and personally. wasn't it inevitable that if you ignore and empower someone who's constantly stoking animus, eventually it blows up? >> yeah. well, obviously did not have to happen. but the president, when he brings the mob together and basically says to march on the

capitol and identifies, you know, the vice president as the enemy basically here, and then to feign surprise later when the capitol is sacked, that just doesn't wash. so i think that, you know, none of this is inevitable. but, boy, the president sure stoked the fire, and he can't escape blame now. >> what is more in the interest of the country? investigating and perhaps trying to prosecute the president politically or legally, or is it more in the interest of the country to just have him fade away? >> i'd rather see him fade away. as for the next 13 days, i'm with -- frankly with president-elect biden and colin powell, mitt romney and others who have said they hope that it just goes quietly. i would rather see the congress -- the senate has the role here -- to hold hearings on the president-elect's nominees for his cabinet so that they can

tee them up so that this new administration can hit the ground running. that would be more valuable and i think more appropriate than trying to go in and invoke the 25th amendment or impeachment. i think sufficient guardrails are around the president. i don't believe anyone is going to accept an unlawful order from the president, and gratefully a few individuals, i think, are staying around to ensure that he doesn't do anything more untoward. >> former senator jeff flake, your perspective is going to be invaluable in the weeks and months to come as we try to understand the path forward not just for your party but for us as a people. welcome and thank you. >> thank you, andrew. >> all right. it's unbelievable -- everybody calls me andrew. don't worry about it. my mother says the same thing. it is unbelievable that some retrumplicans and people on state tv are trying to pin blame for the insurrection on leftist fringe groups. you saw it with your own eyes. it's not about the facts.

it's about how you should feel about the people who are lying to you about it. let's talk proof, okay? and then we'll talk penalties. we're going to show you exactly who some of these terrorists -- may have started as a protester, demonstrator, then turned into a rioter, then turned into a terrorist, because the fbi needs your help identifying some of the others and you may be able to do just that, next. new projects means new project managers.

you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. the moment you sponsor a job on indeed you get a short list of quality candidates from our resume database. claim your seventy five dollar credit, when you post your first job at indeed.com/home.

(combative yelling) he used to have bad breath. now, he uses a capful of therabreath fresh breath oral rinse to keep his breath smelling great, all day long. (combative yelling) therabreath, it's a better mouthwash. at walmart, target and other fine stores.

now, here's the fact. we can talk about them again, okay, because we don't have someone at the top of the food chain actively trying to lie about what is real and what is fake. what we witnessed at the capitol was exactly what it looked like. the same retrumplicans who hid as the monster they created, the frankenstein ran wild, now straight-up lie to your face. >> they were masquerading as trump supporters, and in fact were members of the violent terrorist group antifa. >> there is some indication that fascist antifa elements were involved. >> once again, we only know what you show. i know it's great to demonize the brown people, but show proof or shut up. we know and are learning more about exactly who these people are. take a look.

derek evans, just elected to the west virginia house of delegates. yeah, that's him. the rest don't deserve their names to be recognized, but their allegiance is clear. the guy you've seen sitting behind nancy pelosi's desk, he leads a pro gun rights group in arkansas. he was so sure he wouldn't get in trouble, he did an interview the shirtless fool in the horns isn't some antifa operative. he is a dude, from arizona, who is basically a groupie at trump's maga rallies. we're told, charges are coming for the rest. the fbi is putting names to faces, and luckily, they were brazen enough, they feel entitled enough, to put themselves on social media. this is not a surprise. these people traveled to d.c., and told the world they were going to do this. and more importantly, the world was told that they should. what does the treatment of the pro-trump, mostly white mob, tell us about where we really are about systemic, entrenched

inequality, in america? we'll take it up with van jones, next.

start the year smiling at aspen dental

where new starts happen, every day. get exceptional care every step, unparalleled safety at evervisit, and flexible payment options for every budget. now, during the everyday smiles event

new patients get a full exam & set of x-rays with no obligation. no insurance? no worries, it's free. plus, now all patients can get 20% off their treatment plan. find every reason to smile. every day at aspen dental. call 1-800-aspendental or book today at aspendental.com of salads or soups or chicken fried steak, or...send good tidings with a slice of cake. gift food for any occasion. new on doordash. trump, tonight, in what kind of looked like a hostage video,

said the things that you're supposed to say. if you're decent. he told the rioters, whom yesterday, he told he loved after they broke into the capitol. that those, who broke the law, will pay. so, why the aboutface? well, it could be that people are fleeing, high posts, all around him, in disgust. or, that the feds are looking at potentially charging him. or maybe, it's cause for impeachment, again. or the 25th amendment, with less than two weeks to go. regardless, nothing can undo his original expression of love, his inciting of this animus, directed at the capitol by his own instruction. okay? let's discuss with van jones. what is your takeaway from what happened yesterday? >> well, first, i just think we need to acknowledge there are a lot of people who are just really traumatized, across the

country. i don't just mean the people who are inside the capitol, who were, you know, i'm so glad that, you know, most people were able to get out. we didn't have any mass-shooting event. but you just have regular folk trying to go to work, their heads are cloudy. they just don't know what's going on. this hurt a lot of people to see the nation's capitol attacked. and especially, people from other countries who came here trying to get away from this stuff. to then see, you know, an armed group try to, essentially, take power. prevent a joint session of congress from bringing, into power, the next president. to see that happen shook a lot of people. and i just think people are -- are walking around here, hurt, more than anything else. i mean, will work itself out but people are hurt. >> now, trump didn't do it alone. the retrumplicans, the people in office who ignore and power and what you ignore, you do empower and you own. also, fringe sites, but they're just operatives. and i wasn't surprised they

didn't miss a beat in saying this is no different than what blm does. what was surprising to me was how many people of color came out to me and said, imagine if this were brown people. imagine if these were black people. how they would have been treated. and we know what the answer is, in all likelihood, no disrespect to law enforcement but just based on what we've seen. there would have been a degree of harshness that is frightening to think about. or am i wrong? >> no, you're, 100%, right. and -- and -- and you've now taught a whole generation of vea very, very tough lesson because you have young people, especially young people of color, but most people now, we got the most diverse generation in the history of the world coming up behind us, now. and they have seen african-americans, literally, murdered, killed, shot down on their cell phones over and over, again, because they were told to

do this order, and then got killed. and then, to see, you know, i don't know, 10,000, mostly white people, pushing past cops. some of these cops seem to be happy, taking selfies with people. and none of them followed anybody's rules or instructions and nobody got shot. so apparently, police can deescalate. apparently, police can figure out ways to deal with situations, without shooting people. and yet, it wasn't -- it's not done, on a normal basis, for people. so, it is, in fact, the case that when black lives matter came, this summer, to d.c., they had, you know, military out there. it looked like, you know, you know, ninja squads and all kind of stuff for a peaceful protest. and then, nobody for this? there needs to be an investigation. and there is a concern, that i have. were there white-nationalist elements in law enforcement, and in that crowd cooperating? why are people saying that some of the protestors, rioters,

insurrectionists, were flashing police badges and then being allowed in? so, there's got to be a real investigation here. there is a double standard. but there, also, could be some double dealing going on, in terms of a much bigger conspiracy. and we need answers. >> absolutely. those are the right questions. they should be answered. van jones, thank you very much. we'll be right back. when we started carvana, they told us

that selling cars 100% online wouldn't work. but we went to work. building an experience that lets you shop over 17,000 cars from home. creating a coast to coast network to deliver your car as soon as tomorrow. recruiting an army of customer advocates to make your experience incredible. and putting you in control of the whole thing with powerful technology. that's why we've become the nation's fastest growing retailer. because our customers love it. see for yourself, at carvana.com.