good health. >> same to you. have a great day. >> tonight, that controversial policy is no longer in place. the academy changed course after the florida department of education said the quarantine rule was being investigated and it would cut its scholarship funding if it was determined to be in violation of the law, florida law. the chief operating officer moved back to the d.o.e., saying that the school, quote, will continue to be compliant with all of the applicable laws. as gary reported, the school asked parents to keep their children home for 30 days if the child receives a covid dose, fighting claims about the impact of the vaccine shot. that's it for us. the news continues. let's hand it over to chris for "cuomo prime time." i am chris cuomo. and welcome to "prime time." the production of "rust" is shut down indefinitely.

but it has ramped up after actacted actor alec baldwin killed someone. how did a live round end up in a prop gun? there is no such thing as a prop g gun? they only use real guns and just change the ammunition. if they get it right. are we going to hear that no real guns will be used in movies anymore? it seems clear now. misschepped led to the accidental killing of hutchins, the cinematographer. someone was in charge of the gun that baldwin pulled the trigger on. someone handed it to him and told him it was cold, meaning no live ammo. you can ask, why were they using a real gun in a rehearsal? why wasn't it a fake?

why wasn't it a rubber thing? tonight, we're learning more about what is known at this point, those two crew members. she has doubts and expressed them openly on a podcast last month, talking about the movie she worked on before this one. listen to hanna gutierrez. >> i was nervous about it at first. i almost didn't take the job because i wasn't sure if i was ready. but doing it, it went really smoothly. that has taught me everything. but a lot of things, i kind of just caught on by myself. >> observation? >> yeah, observation, watching him do things. and i think loading blanks is the scariest thing to me. i don't know anything about it.

>> the last part is especially haunting. on two basis, right? how can loading blanks be scary? and, two, how do you hire someone who doesn't really no what they're doing by their own admission? and then there's the assist didn't director who handed baldwin the weapon and gave him the go ahead that it was safe to use, allegedly shouting "cold gun." his name is dave hall. we're learning hall was fired from a previous movie he was working on over another gun incident that injured a crew member. the production company, rocket soul studios, said hall was serving as an a.d., on "freedom path" in 2018, when an 1800-style muzzle-loading rifle unexpectedly discharged on the set, causing a sound crew member

to get medical treatment and halted production. this wasn't his first gun incident on a job. and the head armorer wasn't 100% confident in what she was doing, specifically loading blanks into a gun. although again, if it isn't blank, the loading part isn't the problem. it's that they have live ammo on set. why would you have that in a make-believe situation? now, we are hearing multiple reports that there were at least two accidental prop gun -- again, i keep using that word. never use it. it's completely immaterial. there is no such thing as a prop gun in this instance. okay? they're using real guns and not real ammo. you hope. i pause because they probably used real ammo here. that's why someone's dead and someone else injured. the real weapon discharged twice

on-set in the days to the deadly shooting. joe souza is the director of the film. he is okay and talking to investigators in santa fe. they are waiting for a report from the coroner's office, of the type of projectile that killed hutchins. theoretically it could be that there weren't bullets in the gun. like this was a deflective blank or something like that. we don't know. for sure. in all likelihood, something did a catastrophic injury to this young woman, and had enough power to go through her and hit somebody else. we learned enough to bring in a better mind to make sense of how risky this was. you remember bill davis, a firearm trainer for film and television for many years. good to have you back. >> thanks for having me, chris.

>> let's deal with the last thing first. we're waiting on the forensics. what else could have come out of this gun and blown a big hole in somebody and killed them and hit somebody else? except some type of ammunition? >> that's it right there in a nutshell. it had to be a live round with a led projectile, in order to penetrate one body and partially penetrate another. you can't do that with a plblan. >> right. you heard that the armorer said one of the scariest things in doing the job the first time, the job right before this one, she said loading blanks was tricky. why? >> well, it's not tricky. it is to be uninitiated or the inexperienced. she is 24 years old. by law in the united states, you have to be at least 21 years old to handle firearms. and why would somebody hire somebody like this and make them

a quote/unquote armorer when it takes years to be an armorer. you can be a gun handler. but that's wasn't what she was doing. she wasn't focused and didn't know the weapon. >> this isn't how she loaded blanks. it's that they had live ammo on set, right? >> yeah. that's my understanding. i still am -- because we're no longer dealing with a movie set, we're dealing with a crime scene, i think they're investigating for negligent homicide as soon as they can lay that off, which there seems to be an abundance of people involved in this, there's just no way that the first a.d. should have had any access to the gun at all. should not be touching the gun. it goes from the armorer to the actor and back to the armorer. >> let's call it the chain of custody, for no other -- i know it's a movie. it goes from the armorer, who is supposed to check it and know

what she or he put in the weapon. and then, it's supposed to go right to the actor. and the actor should check also, no? >> oh, of course. normally, at least what i do, and i've learned from other armorers over the years, how i got to be long lasting in this industry, you have to learn from those that know. it's like anything else. you get into a field of endeavor and you have to pay attention, have to focus, have to learn the business. well, live ammo has absolutely -- and i say this -- i'm deadly serious. live ammo has no place on a motion picture or television studio set. it has no place on a set anywhere at any time. >> the only reason it would be there, the last time we spoke, you said it's possible that if they ran out of dummy bullets for a close-up in showing

someone loading a gun, so that you wouldn't notice there was no slug on the top of the casing, because it's a blank, maybe you would try to substitute the dummy bullets, which are casing with no gun powder and a slug on top, with real ammo. i know you would never do that. but that's the only possibility, right? >> i suppose that's one of the possibilities. when you're dealing with ammunition, a blank round of ammunition right here, for the cowboy -- that's why it fits into the 1873 single-action army, the one i was using. you have a blank round, it's crimped on the front. if you were to load a live round, this is a live round of ammunition, and .45 long colt.

you notice the long projectile at the end. then, you're dealing with another dummy round. looks like the real deal. shiny, brand-new. and it has that silver circle that has a big dent in it, which indicates it's used, spent primer. if it had powder in it, it wouldn't go off. there's no ignition source. >> let me ask you something quick before i let you go, bill. thank you for taking time to come on with us. >> no problem. >> what do you think of the suggestion that you shouldn't be using real guns in a make believer endeavor in a motion picture? you have the technology now. and just the safety issues alone, it's time for a change. >> if i thought for a moment, it would make the movie look better to use nonguns or use plastic

guns or rubber guns and use computer cgi for the flash, i would be standing in line and say, sign me up. i want to run these guns. i want to learn about them. but sadly enough, they don't look real. not only do they not appear real, like this one is a real one. the patina of it, the action of the hammer and the cylinder turning, you can't get that in a rubber or plastic gun. you can get replicas. this is a replica. it boils down to experience, neglect, and failure to perform your function as an armorer. and there's no excuse for that. if you're going to call yourself an armorer, you better know the job. and you can't call yourself an armorer or a prop master after just two movies. >> i hear you. >> it's not right. it doesn't happen. >> bill davis, thank you very much for talking to us about the

ins and outs. thank you. be well. >> my pleasure. good night. > >> bill raises another question we're going to take on. this was an accident on one part. and it was a failure to do your job in the main part. what does that mean? what does that mean legally? you heard bill say the investigators may be trying to do criminally negligent homicide. that's a very specific crime with a specific mental intent and a burden of proof. is there criminal exposure? is there civil liability? that's a yes. would this be about alec baldwin? we have a legal mind that's been put to these types of questions. next.

it's grown. it's earned and tested. ♪ we all have the strength to see what's possible. it's up to us to unlock it. tonal. be your strongest. ♪ limu emu & doug ♪ got a couple of bogeys on your six, limu. they need customized car insurance from liberty mutual so they only pay for what they need. what do you say we see what this bird can do? woooooooooooooo... we are not getting you a helicopter. looks like we're walking, kid. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ when did you see the signs? when i needed to create a better visitor experience. improve our workflow. attract new customers. that's when fastsigns recommended fleet graphics.

yeah, and now business is rolling in. get started at fastsigns.com.

for all the intrigue

surrounding the alec baldwin shooting on the "rust" set is what happens now? what is the exposure? is there going to be criminal exposure on this? halyna hutchins is dead. she was a mom. she was a professional. she was a wife. she's gone. is there criminal exposure? baldwin was told he had a cold gun in his hand. did the person check? is there exposure for that? there was live ammo on-set. was the exposure for that? a lot of it to me sounds like it will be about civil. it will be about money and liability. but could it be more? attorney stuart franklin knows the law in this area, even in new mexico. he represented a stunt woman who was injured in one of hollywood's "resident evil" movies. he understands the analysis here on both sides of the table.

thank you very much, counsel. i didn't hear you. let me see if it's me or if i can hear you. let me see if i can hear you. >> i hear you loud and clear, chris. can you hear me now? >> you want to give me a heart attack? now you have criminal exposure. when you look at the fact pattern, help us understand what is the universal possibility as you understand the community? >> first off, we have to say our heartfelt condolences to that family and mr. souza and hope he heals fast and heals well. moving to the second part of your question, what is the exposure here? we're lookingal two things. criminal exposure and civil exposures. you want to start the criminal first? >> yeah, please. >> first off, we have a situation where the district attorney in the state of new mexico is going to investigate this potential

crime. they're going to collect all the facts and determine whether or not they want to charge any or all of the people involved, you know, mr. baldwin, m ms. gutierrez, mr. hall, with involuntary manslaughter. when you're dealing with involuntary manslaughter, you have to prove there was an intentional killing and it happened in a reckless manner. you have to prove that there's criminal negligence. there has to be a little more than i made a mistake. does that make sense? >> it does. we're not talking about, i made a mistake. we're not talking about -- this would all be civil. you had a duty to do this job the right way. you didn't do it the right way. and it cause d an injury. now, you have to pay. that has civil liability all over it. but on the criminal side, negligence isn't ordinary negligence. you have to approximate a higher standard to trigger a statue, no

pun intended, even in new mexico. what does that look like in terms of a factual representation? >> sure, let me give you an example. for example, i'm standing in my backyard and it's fourth of july. i take my gun out. i'm so excited. i shoot my pistol in the air. i don't want it to hurt anyone. i am not intending to kill anybody. but the round travels through the air and drops down and hit someone and kills someone. i could be charged with involuntary manslaughter. i had the intent to pull the trigger, knowing that a round would be discharged and it is foreseeable that someone would be injured and/or killed as a result of my actions. that is enough. here, you know, we said before. a lot of it we don't know. was any or all these people's conduct reckless? did they know it was a live round? we don't know what live round means here. we're talking about was it a projectile in the cartridge? we don't know. it could have been a blank and

that blank can kill people. we don't know that. >> i don't know. listen, you're right. you're asking the questions the right way. in terms of the strongest suggestion here, it would be shocking if the forensic examine comes back and says this is a blank. this was a catastrophic injury that resulted in her death. and the way, you know, what it takes to do -- that's no blank. especially that distance. i hear what you're saying, though. we have to wait for the forensic. alec baldwin -- how does alec baldwin. he was handed what was called a cold gun. and he was rehearsing a scene. isn't this really about the guy who said it was a cold gun when, obviously, they didn't check or know what they were checking for? and the armorer who may have had live ammo on the set? >> not necessarily. when i was in the marine corps, i was taught when handling a weapon. if you need to point it at someone, you need to intend to

kill them. if someone hands you a weapon and tell you that it's cold, is trust by verify. you need to verify that gun is safe. if you look at basic gun safety, you treat a gun as if it's loaded. you never point it at someone and you don't put your finger on the trigger unless you intend to pull it. right here, we know alec baldwin, from what we know, didn't verify there was no rounds. why were there rounds in there? it's simple to open the gun up. you can see it. there never should have been rounds in there. for this -- trying to figure out what the line of sight is going to be, et cetera. he has the duty and responsibility. it's a lot of shared responsibility and a lot of bad actors. >> stuart, thank you very much. >> thank you very much. have a great night. >> when you go to negligence and understanding and not doing the right thing, forget about the movie set. think about social media and the big proprietiers.

facebook is in the crosshairs. they're not in here. we have a reason to believe that facebook didn't do enough to stop the lies that fueled the violent insurrection on january 6th. i'm not saying it. facebook said it, in internal documents. look at this. i can barely lift it. thousands and thousands of pages of leaked documents referred to as the facebook papers. it reveals a lot. you know what this means other than a tv prop? that's a lot of discussion about something you want to pretend you never really focused on and don't have any control over. let's bring in a true pro, knows the company, knows the business model, knows the behavior and knows the reality. roger mcnamee. he wrote the book on facebook, literally. let's talk to him about what the solution is, next. [suitcase closing] [gusts of wind] [ding]

you could fret about that email you just sent. ...with a typo. aaaand most of the info is totally outdated. orrrr... you could use slack. and edit your message after it's sent. [sigh of relief.] slack.

where the future works.

ever wonder how san francisco became the greenest big city in america? just ask the employee owners of recology. we built the recycling system from the ground up, helping san francisco become the first city in the country to have a universal recycling and composting program for residents and businesses. but it all starts with you. let's keep making a differene together.

the saga of social media, or as i see it, anti-social media. i'm just -- you can't get past it. of course, facebook plays for profits. of course, it doesn't always do what it tells us it's going to do. that's business. we both know it. the problem is, facebook and the other major players in social media are too important to be allowed to do what other big businesses do.

no other businesses played a role in the shaping of what political behavior, let alone the january 6th domestic terror attack on the u.s. capitol. cnn has this big, fat stack of documents, explosive in their implications, including how, quote, almost all of the fastest growing facebook groups were stopped. and how, quote, the harm existed at the network level. it normalized deliggettization and hate, in a way of offline hate and the norms of underpinning democracy. this is from them. not from me. there are example after example of facebook employees raising concerns, demanding the company behave better. but it has been allowed to play around like many big companies do. so, everyone was acting surprised at this.

hasn't been paying attention. look at almost any of the nearly 600 indictments of people charged with attacking our capitol. facebook's role on them being all over the damn board. you know who else facebook played a role in organizing the events of january 6th, the organizers of so-called stop the steal events. listen. >> you guys hear about this event today? >> through facebook. >> facebook, instagram. >> yes. i created a facebook event for yesterday's event. and i posted after the fact that we were again coming today. i will be, again, making another event in regards to tomorrow. >> look, we all know the problem. what is the fix? how do we balance rights and responsibilities. zuckerberg focuses on the first one, rights. it's the easy one.

>> i do agree that we should work to get people the fullest free expression that is possible. i'm committed to making sure facebook is a platform for all ideas. when i talk about giving people a voice, that's what i care about. >> he has to care about what they do with that voice, as well. and how to monitor it. they admitted they can. we're chatting about something on facebook or e-mail, you start getting ads about what you're talking about. in the days after the terror attack, sheryl sandberg, the company's chief operating officer, claimed that other platforms, quote, don't have our abilities to stop hate. they have the tools. we know it. but this also shows why self-regulation won't cut it. a company that prides itself on mining every piece of data it can get its hands on, rejected its own advisory board's recommendation, to study how its

policies contribute to the violence. few know the scope of the challenge better than roger mcnamee. the book is "zucked." glad to have you. i held up a big stack of papers like a "b" actor, we know this. they say it in the senate hearings, even zuckerberg himself. you have to regulate us. we're open to regulation. what is the fix? we're past the point of can they? it's should they? and now, i believe we think it's, yes. what does that look like? >> chris, there's three problems you have to solve in any regulatory scheme. companies like facebook, this would apply to google and amazon and others, they operate at facebook scale. facebook has put 3 billion people on a network with no borders, no boundaries, no limits.

so, anything can happen. the second thing they did, which is again, common not just to facebook but also google and spreading through the economy, they have the ability to target each of us individually. they have a little model, which is everything we've ever done in the real world that's turned judicial. you leave footprints on your phone, when you travel, when you make a financial payment, anything like that. anytime you use an app or prowse the weapon. they know us and have the ability to target us. and they can manipulate us. and the third part of the problem, this is where it all comes together, is that when you match that business model to that giant network of 3 billion people, it essentially, you want those people active. and so, you promote the most emotional ideas out there. and what happens is, that things that are normally at the fringe, like white supremacy, or anti-vax, suddenly, you have that into the extreme. and facebook and other companies

promote that stuff because it's more profitable than news. more profitable than kitten photos. as a consequence, the whole thing becomes this huge nexus for scams at heart. you want to solve it, you have to solve all three. safety, privacy and competition are the three problems. we need fda to protect. we need to have rules that say i'm sorry but you can't use that d data, like all locations in any kind of -- and you need to have new rules to pretrvent companie from getting so big. >> she has a bill that's out there. it's directed towards looking at from an antitrust perspective. break the companies up. they're too big. is that the key? >> i think it's a key. but the way i look at competition, actually, chris, is the big issue today is it's

impossible for start-ups to compete. and if you broke facebook up into pieces, it would be impossible to compete with the mothership or instagram or whatsapp. they're so market dominant in the spaces you can't compete. what you really need to do is to prevent companies like facebook, from operating ad marketplaces at the same time they operate networks. you have to separate the components as well as the divisions from each other. that's only a piece of it. without the safety rules that have to aemploy to all of technology, and the privacy rules, it won't help just to regulate them from competition. they're doing too much harm. >> we know this can be bad. and i honestly believe -- i don't need to be a cynic. having you in my life has improved my disposition on this. i believe the problem works better for all of the power players than the solutions. even in government. >> yeah. >> going after facebook, it's

the only thing that unites the right and left. they're both attacking facebook. you have the people on the right saying, don't sensor us. they get the most traction on facebook and the sites. and you have the left saying you have to control more. it's like immigration. the problem works better than the solution. roger mcnamee, thanks for helping us understand this. to be continued. we're going to keep talking solutions. like i said, we have senator amy klobuchar. understands the law and policy at the state and national level. she has a bill for regulation. she has not been sleeping about this. she just can't get by them. what does she make of what mcnamee says? what is the future for her bill or any kind of regulation? next. they drove to safelite for a same-day repair. and with their insurance, it was no cost to them. >> woman: really? >> tech: that's service the way you need it. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ we have to be able to repair the enamel on a daily basis. with pronamel repair toothpaste,

we can help actively repair enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative. my go to toothpaste is going to be pronamel repair.

wealth is breaking ground on your biggest project yet. worth is giving the people who build it a solid foundation. wealth is shutting down the office for mike's retirement party. worth is giving the employee who spent half his life with you, the party of a lifetime. wealth is watching your business grow. worth is watching your employees grow with it. principal. for all it's worth. ♪ darling, i, i can't get enough of your love babe♪ ♪girl, i don't know, i don't know,♪ ♪i don't know why i can't get♪ applebee's. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. discover card i just got my cashback match is this for real? yup! we match all the cash back new card members

earn at the end of their first year automatically woo! i got my mo-ney! it's hard to contain yourself isn't it? uh- huh! well let it go! woooo! get a dollar for dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover.

the head of facebook, mark

zuckerberg is not happy. he does not like the headlines. his take on today's earnings call -- no irony there on the earnings call, talking about this -- is all an effort to make the company look bad. listen. >> good faith criticism is okay. but my view is what we are seeing is that a coordinated effort is to release these documents to paint a false picture of our company. we have an open culture where we encourage discussion and research, about our work so we can make progress on many competitions that are not specific to just us. >> i would love him to come on the show and have a frank conversation about this. my suspicion is, it's been obvious to facebook than the rest of us, because they understand the capabilities in a way that our government never did. why hasn't he fixed this? is it what makes you money and

the provocative things are what works for you? you want to talk frank? you want to be upset? do it. is the fix anywhere close in our economy? senate judiciary committee member senator amy klobuchar. she has done the homework and the law and the policy and has understood the need for change here for a long time. >> that's what i was thinking as i heard him speak at the earnings meeting. i've been taking this on long before there were any documents out there. and that's because any parent, anyone that's interested in our democracy, no matter what party they're part of, you start to see the harm. you start to see the injury. you start to see the fact that they are putting profit and that is based on polarized and a algorithms that have angry speech, they put that in the safety of this nation. that's a fact.

i would suggest reading the book "the ugly truth" by two "new york times" reporters. it sums it all up. >> we know the problem. do you believe there is the will in government these days, to fix it? >> yes. it's not going to be easy. there's lobbyists around every corner. the tech industry has hired over 300 lobbyists. and i noted that at the whistleblower hearing. my colleagues have to get through this. they're going to hear from lobbyists. they have to look at the facts and listen to their constituents, like i listen to seven moms and dads who talk about desperately trying to keep their kids in a safe place so they can grow up without being exposed to accounts like how to be perfect or how to be thin or some of the things they get exposed to when they ask -- or someone who asked about doing a school report on vaping. and then started getting ads for vaping equipment. that's a fact.

and this shouldn't be happening to young kids. that's part of it. the other part of it is what was just revealed today, in "the new york times" and elsewhere, and a lot of reporting from "the wall street journal," cnn, what this did to our democracy. the fact that mark zuckerberg claimed before congress, that 94% of this content was down when people within his own company's researchers are saying it's 5%. to see what will happen, a woman from north carolina was simply saying, she's a fan of melania trump, okay. she starts getting qanon content. we know this. anybody who uses facebook or the like knows this. it's hurting people and hurting our democracy. >> the conceptual pushback is free speech. and your brothers and sisters on the right, say you want to censor them more. that's what it is for the left.

what is the balance for you between right and responsibility? >> very good point. and you want to have free speech, right? there's a difference between someone, in a crowded movie theater yelling fire. that's not free speech, right? that's not protected speech. but guess what? this is the trick of the algorithms. it would be like a multiplex theater put speakers and broadcast it. they would be liable for that. you have algorithms. we need transparency and we need to make sure researchers can access them. and we have to look at the liability provisions for that. second big bucket of things, privacy laws. we don't have a federal privacy la hindered us. it's one of the reasons that facebook and platforms make so much money off of americans compared to other countries because there's no rules of the road for privacy. and finally, what was -- i know has been the subject before of some discussions with you, me and others, competition policy and trying to allow the

marketplace to develop alternatives with new bells and whistles. we're never going to know what the bells and whistles are. in the words of mark zuckerberg in an e-mail, he would rather buy than compete. you don't develop a competitive products that might protect kids or may do something about vaccine misinformation if they buy everything in sight and our government allows them to do that. the end must come to that. and that means making our laws more sophisticated and investing in our agencies and putting, as joe biden is doing, people in charge are going to take this on in a serious way. >> the big challenge would be any kind of collective political will, obviously. you have to figure out how to enforce it. i remember you. you and i. i'm much older than you, senator. we remember when the conversation was about stocks and securities and how can we really regulate trading? it's so complicated. that was stone age compared to

what these people are doing. you're fighting a good fight. you're doing the work of the people. we'll stay on it, senator. >> i notice that my bill has 11 different senators on it. and it includes people like chuck grassley, dick durbin, lindsey graham and cory booker and mark warner. we have half democrats, half republicans, there's starting to be bipartisan work in this area and that's important to get this done. >> good luck. >> thank you. >> take care, senator. one of the biggest tests of joe biden's presidency is coming. and it's not about washington infighting. are we headed into a new cold war with china? in fact, i would suggest, the better question, are we there already? let's bring in someone who helps us understand what biden is facing when he faces the world at the g20 coming up this week. what is the challenge? next. help people find their way.

fastsigns designed new directional signage. and got them back on track. get started at fastsigns.com. i always protect my voice. it's how i make my living. and you and i make a country with our voices. your vote is your voice. but more than ever, our freedom to vote is under attack. so please: call congress. tell them to pass the freedom to vote act. to protect our ability to have our say on the issues that matter most. so, let's pass the freedom to vote act and protect all our voices. i strip on public transit. i strip with the guys. i strip all by myself. breathe right strips open your nose for relief you can feel right away, helping you take in air more easily, day or night. [ joe ] my teeth were a mess. i had a lot of pain. as far as my physical health, my body was telling me you got to do something. and so i came to clearchoice.

your mouth is the gateway to your body. joe's treatment plan was replacing the teeth with dental implants from clearchoice. [ joe ] clearchoice has changed my life for the better. it's given me my health back. there's an amazing life out there if you do something for your health now. i'm not getting through the pandemic just to end up with the flu. i asked for fluzone high-dose quadrivalent. it's the #1-used flu vaccine for people 65 and older. fluzone high-dose quadrivalent is the only vaccine approved by the fda for superior flu protection in adults 65+. i'm not letting my guard down. fluzone high-dose quadrivalent isn't for people who've had a severe allergic reaction to any flu vaccine or vaccine component, including eggs or egg products. tell your health care professional if you've ever experienced severe muscle weakness after receiving a flu shot. people with weakened immune systems, including those receiving therapies that suppress the immune system, may experience lower immune responses.

vaccination may not protect everyone. side effects include pain, redness, and/or swelling where you got the shot, muscle ache, headache, and general discomfort. other side effects may occur. all flu shots are not the same. i raised my game with fluzone high-dose quadrivalent. ask your doctor or pharmacist for fluzone high-dose quadrivalent.

as someone who resembles someone else, i appreciate that liberty mutual knows everyone's unique. that's why they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. [ ferry horn honks ] i mean just cause you look like someone else doesn't mean you eat off the floor, [ chuckles ] or yell at the vacuum, or need flea medication. oh, yeah. that's the spot. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ♪ ♪ [doorbell] ♪ ♪ [doorbell] ♪ ♪ [doorbell] all the delivery. no delivery fees. dashpass.

is president biden joins world leaders in the world, a climate summit in glasgow, scotland later this week, a noticeable there will be absent but looming large, china, tensions with the superpower have only been building after joe biden took office, and china's actions, evidence of a new cold war, like what, a country launching a nuclear capable hypersonic missile, launched three more astronauts to the space station, ratcheted up the intrusions on taiwan's airspace and manage the release of a top executive for two canadians and 2 americans with what looked like a prisoner swap. what should we make of all this, the spring in the global politics expert, ian brehmer, first, is there an urgency? >> there is an importance, by far the most powerful country

in the world except for the united states and we agree on very little, there's virtually no trust, i wouldn't say there is urgency in the sense that there is no impending crisis is imminent, but clearly if you're talking about were foreign- policy parties are for the united states around the world, china is clearly number 1 right now. >> cold war, media hype was at a functional reality or future prospect? >> right now it is media hype, it could be a future prospect, but we are not close to it, it's important to recognize these two countries need each other immensely, and the amount of economic interdependence, between united states and china, goes both ways, is overwhelming, and the banks and corporations, they are most of them, not only planning to stay in china, but a majority in china are planning on expanding, investments in china, these minority say china

is by far the most important future market that they have around the world, is a country that's likely to be the largest economy in the world by 2030, it is not -- think of it this way, rather than a cold war, it's more relationship between a husband and a wife where you hit each other, there's no trust, you are living with the kids, and you both love the kids, and as a consequence, there is a deep psychological challenge about how you're going to persist in this household, we're not to do damage. >> what does it mean for president biden, when he faces friends and not so friends at the g 20?>> you mentioned that she's impeding is not coming, xi xinping has not left china since january 2020, because they have zero tolerance around covid and the vaccines don't work well, in the same way that

the americans are overwhelmingly prioritizing turning a couple of trillion dollars through in trying to improve joe biden's performance before the midterm elections of the don't lose both the houses, he's the same thing, please talk about bolton road, the chinese were doing the marshall plan around the world and everyone's going to align with beijing, the last five years the external investments are down almost 80%, through belton road, they have really big challenges for a financial crisis, this real estate thing that split upon them, big energy shortages, having to do rationing and causing our prices to go up on goods, because they are able to get the supply chain working the weight should, the problems and -- internally are easily as distracting as ours are you might not like this as an answer, to the extent were not heading towards a cold war, it is largely because things are so messed up at home for both countries, we beat on each other because we want to burnish the bona fides but not up for a fight.>> that's for

sure, how do you think president biden has handled china as opposed to his predecessor? bigger it's interesting, he's made a lot of mistakes on foreign policy but china is not one of them, america and europe, allies mistress joe biden because of the way he handled afghanistan and not allowing them to travel through the u.s. to covid, because of covid, the allies feel like the united states can be counted on, think about the quad for example, the new diplomatic engagement with the indians and the australians the japanese, all countries that want to see more united states in their backyard, because they are working about china, the relationship is going very well, the announcement of this new august deal, really antagonizing the french and the chinese even more, but the australians really wanted it, because the chinese launched a trade war against australia, so when you're talking about the asian allies, and this pivot

towards the region, because people are concerned that china is getting too strong and not aligning with the rules of engagement that the americans and our allies are of been living with for decades now, hardly speaking the asian allies are pretty happy with the biden administration now pick >> a good test for the president to see how he can operate in this setting and control outcomes in terms of change of disposition towards him in the united states, i will be there and we will be watching, ian bremmer, thank you very much, we will take a quick break and we will come back with the handoff. you could email an urgent question to lisa in marketing. and a follow up. and a “did you see my email?” text. orrrr... you could see her status in slack. and give lisa a break while you find someone online who can help. slack. where the future works.

tv: mount everest, the tallest mountain on the face of the earth. keep dreaming. [coins clinking in jar] ♪ you can get it if you really want it, by jimmy cliff ♪ ♪ [suitcase closing] [gusts of wind] [gusts of wind] [ding]

in business, setbacks change everything. so get comcast business internet and add securityedge. it helps keep your network safe by scanning for threats every 10 minutes. and unlike some cybersecurity options, this helps protect every connected device. yours, your employees' and even your customers'. so you can stay ahead. get started with a great offer and ask how you can add comcast business securityedge. plus for a limited time, ask how to get a $500 prepaid card when you upgrade. call today.

all right, listen, don't take things the wrong way okay, when it comes to social media, we want free expression and a marketplace of ideas, but there has to be a balance of rights and responsibilities, this is not a legal question, you know that you can, it's about how you do it. we can do better. enough on the problem, what is the fix, thank you for watching, don lemon tonight with the big star, don lemon right now pick >> the fix is