those platforms are blocked here. we did reach out, by the way, for comment to several influencers. those who got back to us, they maintain they are not paid by china. which andanderson, in some case may be true. but they at times see the benefit of their work being amplified to a population of more than 1.4 billion people, anderson. >> david culver from beijing. thanks so much. appreciate it. the news continues. want to turn it over to don and "don lemon tonight." >> anderson, thank you very much. i appreciate it. this is "don lemon tonight." just imagine what they know. just imagine what they know. two more witnesses speaking to the january 6th committee just today. the leader of the oath keepers, who was in jail, by the way, in oklahoma ahead of his trial on charges of seditious conspiracy, appearing remotely for several hours. his attorney says that he is answering many questions and taking the fifth on others. and then there's trump doj official jeffrey clark, who pushed the justice department to pursue the former president's big lie of bogus voter fraud.

he's really stalled for hours. a move that comes straight out of the trump playbook. and was held in contempt, bieptbiey the way, for refusing to cooperate with the committee. before showing up today and leaving after less than two hours. i wonder how many times you can say "i plead fifth" in under two hours. the national archives preparing to turn over records from the former vice president mike pence. the first records to come from his office. that as top pence aides have been talking to investigators. so with all of this is it is no surprise that the disgraced former president is doubling down on the wild claims that he pardoned january 6th rioters, he would do that, even though he didn't do it while he was actually in office because his legal advisers talked him out of it. now he's feuding with lindsey graham. who called his pardon talk inappropriate. >> i don't want to send any signal that it was okay to defile the capitol. there are other groups with causes that may want to go down

the violent path if these people get pardoned. i think it's inappropriate. i don't want to reinforce that defiling the capitol was okay. i don't want to do anything that would make this more likely in the future. >> the disgraced former president lobbing what may be his favorite insult, rino. >> lindsey graham's wrong. i mean, lindsey's a nice guy, but he's a rino. these people are being treated horribly. i would absolutely -- because some of them are being treated very unfairly. yeah. i would absolutely give them a pardon -- >> the punishments -- >> what they've done to them compared to what they've done to the soo side. you know, you have to have equal justice. and this isn't equal. >> no. >> so i would absolutely be prepared. and lindsey graham doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. >> lindsey graham defending his comments, saying "all americans are entitled to have a speedy trial and their day in court. but those who actively engage in violence for whatever political cause may be held accountable and not be forgiven." it's all part of the same old

playbook, really. intimidating, threatening, dangling pardons. the star witness in the ukraine impeachment saga, the former first -- the former president's first impeachment, is suing trump allies including rudy giuliani and don jr., alleging that they conspired to intimidate and retaliate against him because he was willing to testify against the then president. remember this dramatic moment? this is from the impeachment hearing. when the now retired army lieutenant colonel alexander vindman said this. >> dad, i'm sitting here today in the u.s. capitol talking to our elected professionals, talking to our elected professionals is proof that you made the right decision 40 years ago to leave the soviet union and come here to the united states of america in search of a better life for our family. do not worry. i will be fine for telling the truth. >> that man told the truth. and the then president fired him from the national security council.

like i said, right out of the trump playbook. whether republicans like it or not, the former president still has a death grip on the party, if you want to call it a party. now there are other words, other terms you can call it. so what are they doing when they could be or should be calling hum him out? when they should be operating within a democracy. what are they doing? they're stoking culture wars. they're playing to the base with manufactured outrage over president joe biden's vow to nominate the first black woman to the supreme court. they can't hang their outrage on her education or her record or anything at all other than the within thing that they know. that she's black. they don't even know who she is yet. you've heard their cries. it's offensive. it's discrimination. it's affirmative action. that's what they say. all of that is pretty hard to square with the fact that there's never in the 233-year history of the court, there's never been one single black

female justice. think about that. wouldn't you think a black woman -- black women around this country would say hey, don't we deserve a shot? 233 years. you're going to call it affirmative action? i guess the facts don't really matter when you're trying to gin up outrage any way you can. there's senator john kennedy telling politico this, and i'm quoting here, "number one, i want a nominee who knows a law book from a j. crew catalog. number two, i want a nominee who's not going to try to rewrite the constitution every other thursday to try to advance a woke agenda." there's a whole lot there, especially the whole j. crew catalog thing. but i don't have all night and i just got off a redeye and i'm tired. senator kennedy, really? you're an ignoramus.

you are just that dumb. and i'm embarrassed because i'm from louisiana. you embarrassed louisiana, all louisianans. just when you think you've heard it all, even though the president of the united states has vowed that his nominee will have extraordinary qualifications, extraordinary character, extraordinary experience and integrity, the senator manages to insult her intelligence. now, i'll remind you, before he even knows who she is he insults her with a dumb quip about knowing the difference between a law book and a j. crew catalog. sounds a lot like he's already decided that she's going to have a so-called woke agenda. and we've got more tonight on the story everybody is talking about, and that is a former miami dolphins head coach, brian flores, suing the dolphins, the giants, the broncos and the nfl itself for racial discrimination, saying that the

league is managed like a plantation with owners who are not -- who are not black profiting from the labor of players, 70% of whom are black. brian flores will be here tonight. he's going to join me live. and we're going to have a whole lot -- a whole lot of players actually agree with him. everything that he says. watch this. >> this is bigger than football. many have come before. and done a lot to create change in this country. for people of color. and i just felt like in this instance it was my turn to step up and be an agent for change. and i'm proud to do that. >> brian is going to become the rosa parks of the nfl, and rightly so. it it took an inordinate amount of courage for him to file this lawsuit and to stand up against one of the largest corporations in the world and talk about the fact that there is less opportunity for people of color

than there are otherwise. >> this is not only happening in the nfl but it's happening in top corporations and organizations around the country. and so for brian flores to take this stand against one of the most profitable, biggest entities in the country, it's really saying something. >> we're seen as people who can't lead. and i'm speaking african americans. there's a notion of african american quarterbacks not being able to perform at the level of white quarterbacks. there's a notion of african american coaches not being able to perform at the level of black -- excuse me, of white coaches. and so on and so forth. and we still have that narrative in the nfl, and it starts with ownership. >> the fact that you have to have a rule to interview minority coaches is a problem. that's the problem. that's the seed and the foundation of it. but it's to save face. it's to create this whole utopia that everybody is equal in the nfl and everybody's getting an equal opportunity.

>> that is just the beginning, my friends. wait till you hear what brian flores has to say live on this program. breaking news tonight. newly revealed details of just how soon the fake electors plot started. and it was earlier than you think. ♪ my name is austin james. as a musician living with diabetes, fingersticks can be a real challenge. that's why i use the freestyle libre 2 system. with a painless, one-second scan i know my glucose numbers without fingersticks. now i'm managing my diabetes better and i've lowered my a1c from 8.2 to 6.7. take the mystery out of managing your diabetes and lower your a1c. now you know. try it for free at freestylelibre.us king c. gillette is a complete lineup of tools and facial hair care products. this is the style master. designed to style your stubble in one stroke,

a pivoting metal head that defines every edge, and three comb lengths for added versatility. one tool that helps you choose, change, and master your style. king c. gillette (swords clashing) -had enough? -no... arthritis. here. aspercreme arthritis. full prescription-strength? reduces inflammation? thank the gods. don't thank them too soon. kick pain in the aspercreme. one of my favorite supplements is qunol turmeric. turmeric helps with healthy joints and inflammation support. unlike regular turmeric supplements qunol's superior absorption helps me get the full benefits of turmeric. the brand i trust is qunol.

the former president and his allies reportedly hatched a scheme to use fake electors to overturn the results of the 2020 election right after election day. that is according to reporting tonight in the "new york times." let's discuss now with cnn's senior law enforcement analyst andrew mccabe and the former -- he is the former fbi deputy director and senior legal analyst elie hoenig, a former federal prosecutor. gentlemen, thanks for joining us this evening. andrew, "the new york times" reporting that just two weeks after the election lawyers for the trump campaign were laying the groundwork for the alternate electors scheme which ultimately became key to the strategy to overturn the election. what does this new information tell investigators? >> well, don, i think what this

new information shows us is how much more complex, how much more thought out and planned this activity was than some -- you know, we're clearly not dealing with just a riot on january 6th. this was an agreement. you could start to couch it in terms of conspiracy potentially that was undertaken by a number of people around the former president with the clear goal of overturning the results of the election. each one of these documents that we see sheds a little bit more light on exactly who was doing what and identifies new people that the committee certainly will want to talk to and probably folks that will come across the doj's radar now that we know they're looking into the same activity. >> i can hardly believe i'm speaking to you gentlemen about this every time we report on it. i mean, elie, federal prosecutors are reviewing the fake electoral college certificates submitted to the national archives. now we're starting to see how early this plan came into focus on january 6th, how early it was

hatched. will there be any recourse for laws broken here? >> you and i are very much on the same page on asking that question. when you look at these fake elector certificates, they're really different than a lot of the other planning, plotting discussion that we've learned about because if you want to point to a specific concrete federal crime, creating and submitting falsified documents to the federal government, to the national archives, that is a straightforward federal crime. and you and i continue to ask, and i will continue to ask, where is doj on this? all they've told us is they received a referral on this, they're aware of it. that's not enough. and the time frame that we're talking, we're a year out from january 6th and we've seen no concrete evidence that they're looking at anybody above the ground level. and if that doesn't change, bottom line is there's not going to be any meaningful consequences to anyone for this. >> but andrew, here's why it matters. this was a key part of the pressure campaign on pence to

step in and not certify the election. that's why it matters. and it's the same pressure campaign that led to that deadly violence by the trump supporters on january 6th. it's all part of the same strategy. >> that's absolutely right, don. this is -- i think most people started this thinking about it in terms of january 6th and the riot and the attack on the capitol. but every one of these elements was part of a complicated scheme to achieve the same result. this didn't start on january 6th. it started probably the day after the election. and now we have documents and these memos that actually take -- put a pin in the calendar, as it were, and show us at specific points in time what people were thinking, what they were trying to accomplish. you set up the states to pursue the fake electors. you send in that material. that puts you in a position to put more pressure on mike prence -- mike pence to refuse to certify the results. all of these things depend on

each other. it's a long process and one that was clearly thought out very carefully by the people involved. >> let me follow up, andrew, because as you know just this past weekend trump issued this statement saying he wanted mike pence to overturn the 2020 election. he's laying it all out there. do you think he knows all this information and more, that it's all coming and he's trying to inoculate himself from what is clearly just an un-american behavior here? >> you know, don, we've seen this from trump many times before. he comes right out with it. he throws it out into plain sight as a way of kind of taking the sting out of what he's doing, what he's saying. he throws it out there and pretends as if this is normal political activity, this is normal activity from a president. we know that it's not. we know that it's offensive. we know that it's anti-democratic. but he tries to kind of make things seem normal, to kind of scoop up public opinion to go with him. it's absolutely the same way we've seen him conduct himself all through his time in the presidency. we shouldn't be surprised to see

it here. >> elie, let's talk about jeffrey clark. he's a former justice department official. he met with the january 6th committee for nearly two hours, likely pleading the fifth. he pushed these unfounded voter fraud claims within the doj weeks after the 2020 election. he was in touch with trump reportedly. that's according to officials who interacted with him. what exactly was he up to? >> well, if jeffrey clark took the fifth amendment today, as we believe he did, a, that was the smart move for him legally. b, it's a sad statement that he had a good reason to because let's remember what jeffrey clark did at the justice department that andrew and i both once worked for. he committed a fraud inside the very department that is charged with prosecutie ing fraud. he drafted this letter to the state of georgia saying we've detected significant election fraud that may impact the results of your election and in other states. that's a lie. that is not true.

we know that's not true. and he tried to get the justice department to put their letterhead on that and send that letter out. imagine if they did what jeffrey clark wanted them to do. imagine if jefrry rosen, who was the acting a.g. at the time, went along with that. you would have had doj's official seal, which carries so much weight, behind this election fraud lie. so jeffrey clark is one of the worst actors in this whole thing, and if he took the fifth he's smart to do so. >> and now from jeffrey clark, andrew, to -- did you want to elaborate on that before i ask you a question? >> no. i think elie's exactly right. i think it's also a crafty move to avoid getting referred to doj to be indicted for failing to cooperate with the committee. he clearly did technically cooperate with the committee. he came in, he invoked his constitutional rights. the committee's not going to go after him. this doj certainly not going to go after him for lying -- you know, invoking his constitutional rights. i think he avoided any potential problems in that regard. >> stewart rhodes, he's a

former -- he's an oath keepers leader, and he testified to the committee from jail today. he and ten others were charged with seditious conspiracy, andrew, the most serious charge yet. he allegedly plotted to stop the transfer of power by force, bringing weapons to d.c. and organizing quick response teams to help insurrectionists. some of the oath keepers fought their way inside the capitol. are you surprised that he's cooperating? and is that valuable to them? >> i am surprised, don. i'm surprised that the committee asked him to speak at all, to be perfectly clear. i'm surprised that he agreed to do it it. it's unlikely that rhodes is going to come in and say anything except for self-serving statements designed to get himself out of trouble. we all know he's facing very serious charges under his current indictment. i'm also shocked that his lawyer allowed him to go in and talk to the committee, potentially under oath, and put himself in jeopardy of getting charged with additional offenses for making

false statements. he is -- he's not -- i mean, elie knows better than i do, but i find it hard to believe he was under any sort of a proffer agreement that would have given him protection to speak freely. so i find this whole thing to be really surprising. >> elie, he invoked your name. give me a quick response, please. what do you say to that? >> i'm as confused as andrew about what the strategy is here for stewart rhodes in speaking to the committee. maybe he's trying to earn brownie points when the day comes when he's sentenced he can tell the judge, well, i kind of cooperated. but i would be shocked if he gave the committee usable information on other wrongdoers around him. >> all right. elie, andrew, thank you both very much. i appreciate it. the former president calling an ally names because he disagreed with him. while the rnc is attempting to vote some of their own off the island. and ahead, and behind it all, i is should say, trump's attempt to overturn the election. stay with us.

we just moved. so there's millions of - dahlias in bloom. over nine acres. when we started, we grew a quarter of an acre. now i'm taking on new projects on the regular. we always dreamed of having this property, so - i want to make my yard look as beautiful as butters, here. butters. how are you doing over there? we do both vegetables and large mouth bass. yep. we've got tons of them, don't we, buddy?

there are millions of ways to make the most of your land. learn how to make the most of yours at deere.com at fidelity, your dedicated advisor will help you create a comprehensive wealth plan for your full financial picture. with the right balance of risk and reward. so you can enjoy more of...this. this is the planning effect. ♪ (mail recipient 1) thank you. that's open.

(mail recipient 2) all the mail is open. (mail recipient 4) so this one's open too. (delivery man) yeah, that one's open. (mail recipient 5) why are you delivering mail to me that's open? (delivery man) don't worry nobody read them. (mail recipient 6) and that's okay? (delivery man) oh that looks kind of serious. (mail recipient 6) you cannot just bring me mail that's already opened. as a professional bull-rider i'm used to taking chances. but when it comes to my insurance i don't. i use liberty mutual, they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wooo, yeaa, woooooo and, by switching you could even save 665 dollars. hey tex, can someone else get a turn? yeah, hang on, i'm about to break my own record. yeah. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. ♪

the former president making it loud and clear what he expects from the party he's got in a death grip. admitting the obvious. again, last night. he wanted the election overturned. and he wanted then vice president mike pence to do it even though, in case anyone needs a reminder, mike pence never had the power to change the election result. trump also doubling down this week on his pledge to pardon the rioters from january 6th if he is re-elected.

and yet most republicans still say that they'd support him if he is a candidate in 2024. so joining me now to discuss, the former defense secretary william cohen. thanks, secretary, for joining us. so listen, the former president is slamming lindsey graham, calling him a rino, you know, for saying that he would pardon and -- because he's upset that lindsey graham's saying they shouldn't get a pardon or whatever. what is going on here? >> well, this is what a dictatorship looks like. we have seen this white elephant sitting in our living room for the past five years. he has never tried to hide who he is or what he believes in, and that is total dictatorial power and reverence on the part of those in his party. so if you speak the truth, we will condemn you. if you take any action to reveal what he has said or done, he will -- he will try to put you in jail. isn't this what putin does in russia?

isn't this what every tyrant does, is to arrest his political opponents, either kill them in the case of russia or put them in jail in the case of the russian dissident. and so we're seeing it take place right in front of our eyes, that he wants to lock up hillary clinton, lock up anyone -- he wants to lock up joe biden, lock up his son. and so what he's saying is if i get back into power this is what i'm going to do, i'm going to lock up the people who insult me, disagree with me, don't pay reverence to me, and i'm going to pardon all those who have committed crimes. so he is foretelling us what he foretold us back in 2016 when he said putin -- russia, if you're listening, come on in. and so what he wants to do is to replicate in the united states what putin has in russia. and that's clear to everybody. >> look, anyone who really strikes back, anyone who sort of contradicts what he has to say,

especially republicans personally, right? anything that trump says personally. they say what he's doing is dangerous. they get these repercussions happening. representative liz cheney, adam kinzinger, i mean, they could be out of the republican conference soon. there is -- not be re-elected, right? there's a proposal making the rounds to remove them ahead of the rnc's winter meeting this week. what message is this sending? >> the message is you should fear me. what's it fdr who said the only thing we have to fear is fear itself? well, most of the republicans are fearful. they're fearful of losing his supporters helping them get re-elected. they're also fearful that he has set loose in this country that it's okay to use violence to either intimidate, harass, or inflict punishment upon my political opponent. so he's encouraging them to commit violence. he did it during january 6th.

he has done it last week. he will do it again. if you try and charge me with a crime and he's open to being charged in georgia, he may be open to being charged here in the district for what he did, it was a seditious act, it was treasonous. he's saying but if you charge me i want to turn all of my supporters loose in every major city to show you you can't. i am above the law. can't be charged while i was in office, and i can't be charged after i leave office. if you do, you will all pay a penalty. this is what happens when you slide from democracy. and i'd like to say we're one minute to midnight on the doomsday clock for democracy. we're that close to losing what we have fought so hard to have the past 240 years. and i think it's up to republicans -- i'm glad that lindsey graham spoke out. i would hope that everyone would speak out. any republican, democrat saying we condemn the use of violence to try to intimidate, harass, or hurt our political opponents or

those who disagree with our philosophy. it's really un-american. unpatriotic. >> i want to turn now to the escalating tension in ukraine. president biden announcing today that he's going to deploy 3,000 troops to eastern europe in response to putin building up forces. we have new satellite images. they show that the build-up tonight of what's happening there, russia moving troops and equipment to the front lines and building training areas in belarus, in crimea. would you call this an escalation? what would you call it? >> oh, absolutely. this is what president putin does. he's taken and moved his pieces on the chess board to put us in a position of having to react. look, president putin has issues that we have to deal with. he said what does -- every country acts out of its self-interest. what is putin's self-interest? he doesn't want to be surrounded by countries that he thinks would undermine his sovereignty. so that's a legitimate concern on his part. we're not denying that. he wants to be respected. he wants to be seen as having a

powerful country. all of that i would want if i were there. so i have an issue. we have issues over here. we don't want free countries to live under the roof of a prison, under a jailhouse of tyranny. so how do we accommodate? how do we find common ground saying i know what your interests are, i want you to know what ours are, let's see if we can work out some kind of a deal where our mutual interests are accommodated? frankly, i think we've carried this publicly too much. diplomacy needs to be carried out privately at some point. and now what we're getting into is tabloid news, tabloid diplomacy, where we're searching for headlines and the next day who can insult the other in a more poetic or demeaning way. and so i think we've got to take a step back and say this is really serious, we don't want to get into a war, a hot war with russia. nor do they with us. so understanding that, how do we

defuse the situation? i think president biden's done the right thing. he's saying we're going to send these troops temporarily to our allies, and if you do take action we are likely to send more and make them not temporary but permanent. you don't want that. we don't want to have to do that. but i'll tell you this, don. i think we're paying the wages of the sins of indecision in this country. we sent so many conflicting signals to our allies. it's like the song first you say you do and then you don't. then you say you will and then you won't. and what we're doing is telling the countries in nato saying he o', we're pivoting to asia. oh, by the way, we're getting out of afghanistan. we did get out of afghanistan. we did get out of syria. we're getting out of iraq. and by the way, we've insulted your chaellor, former chancellor, by not even paying her respect. we've sent all of these signals. and now if i'm putin i'm saying hey, i've got some opportunity here to drive a wedge between the united states and the nato allies, and i'm driving a wedge

back in the united states. i'm pitting americans against americans now. we have some americans saying hey, why aren't we supporting putin taking over this country, this free country? so his game plan is pretty clear. what we have to understand is what we do. we have to be consistent. we have to have a comprehensive strategy and stick with it. not for one presidential term but two and three and four. >> yeah. well, i hope someone is listening. thank you very much, secretary. i appreciate you joining us. >> russia, are you listening? >> thank you, secretary. so here we go. whoopi goldberg off your tv for the next two weeks over her holocaust comments. should she have been suspended? where's the line? when should someone be canceled or counseled? we're going to talk about that next. and at the top of the hour the fired nfl coach who is suing for racial discrimination is going to speak out live right here. ♪ pepto bismol coats and soothes your stomach for fast relief

and get the same fast relief in a delightful chew with pepto bismol chews. it's our ultimate sleep number event on the sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to relieve pressure points. and it's temperature balancing so you both sleep just right. and now, save 50% on the sleep number 360 limited edition smart bed. plus, 0% interest for 24 months. only for a limited time. >> woman: what's my safelite story? i see inspiration right through my glass. so when my windshield cracked, i chose safelite. they replaced the glass and recalibrated my safety system. that's service i can trust. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ are you one of the millions of americans who experience occasional bloating, gas or abdominal discomfort? taking align can help. align contains a quality probiotic to naturally help soothe digestive upsets 24/7. try align, the pros in digestive health. and join the align healthy gut team up and learn what millions of align users already know. how great a healthy gut can feel.

sign up at alignprobiotics.com also try align dualbiotics gummies to help support digestive health.

so here's a question. to cancel or counsel? right? that's a question. one day into the suspension of the view host whoopi goldberg she was suspended after offensive comments suggesting race had nothing to do with the holocaust. now, whoopi apologized on air yesterday and spoke about what s she said with adl ceo jonathan greenblatt who was on the show and said he accepted her apology. i want to talk to yasha monk, he's a political theorist at harvard and author of the upcoming book "the great experiment: why diverse democracies fall apart and how then endure." and civil rights leader professor cornel west. good to see both of you gentlemen, appreciate you joining. yas cha, i'm going to start with

you. do you think abc's suspension of whoopi goes too far after her on-air apology? >> yes, i think it does. i just don't see what it's supposed to accomplish. her comments about the holocaust certainly were offensive. it is historically inaccurate to suggest that the murder of 6 million people had nothing to do with race. unfortunately, the way that the nazis thought about race very much characterized jews as an inferior race, and this is a large part of what drove what they called the final solution, what drove the murder of 6 million jews. but whoopi goldberg made a mistake. we solved the problem in the best way we can, with lots of counter speech, with lots of people pointing out the mistake she made. she realized that she'd made a mistake. as you say, she apologized live on air. and that to me was a great teaching moment. viewers of "the view" may have learned something from it, may have come away with a better understanding of this tragic part of human history. and i don't see what is accomplished by telling her basically to go take a time out,

sit in a corner of the room and be ashamed of herself. this is just a way for network executives to demonstrate that they're taking this seriously. it doesn't really accomplish anything in the real world. >> professor west, let me play whoopi's original comments again and then we'll have our conversation. here it is. >> if you're going to do this, then let's be truthful about it. because the holocaust isn't about race. >> no. >> no. it's not about -- >> well, it is -- >> no, it's -- >> a different race -- >> it's not about race. it's not about race. >> what is it about? >> it's about man's inhumanity to man. that's what it's about. >> so the lesson here is that the holocaust was about race. maybe not in the definition that we think of in modern times but it's definitely about race. remember, they were trying to create a master race. jews were the inferior race. that's what jonathan greenblatt went on "the view" to say and said that on this show as well,

that it was about race. what did you think of this? >> well, in these neofascist times we've got to stress integrity, honesty, and courage. when people are wrong, they're wrong. our dear sister whoopi was wrong. brother yascha is right. there's no doubt that when you talk about not just the holocaust, you're talking about 2,000 years of jewish brothers and sisters being a hated people. and this is just the modern -- this is just the modern culmination of it with the shoah, with the holocaust. but whoopi's point about man's inhumanity to man is still a crucial one because the holocaust was distinctive. that 6 million jewish brothers and sisters -- you also had poles. you also had soviet folks. you also had gays. german socialists and communists. but it was primarily targeting jews. but if we can't come out of this teachablmoment with a deeper commitment to truth and

integrity and honesty and courage, then we're not going to be able to be consistent and learning what we need to, which is man's inhumanity to man, the fact that we human beings treat each other so viciously in a variety of different ways. and so we've got to be concerned about the way jewish folk are treated. the way honduran folks are reated. thank god for our brother brian flores and his great courage. the way brothers and sisters in brazil are treated. the way palestinians are treated. the way tibetans are treated. we have to be consistent. has the great message. and so i agree. i think the suspension is excessive. but it will come out more fortified in honesty and integrity. it's just another pr moment. another pr moment in corporate media. you know what i mean? >> it's interesting that you say that, yascha, because i've heard that from many people. but there are others who say she should have been suspended, she should have been fired or what have you. but what good, if someone -- what is the incentive to apologize and to learn if you're

still going to face the same consequences no matter what? do you understand what i'm saying? >> yeah. no, i agree with you entirely. i think there's a broader issue here. i think we're in a strange moment in which we've lost one of the fundamental things you have to believe to live in a democracy, which is that most of the time most of our fellow citizens are trying to do the right thing and can be decent people and are open to argument, are open to persuasion. and so you know, as a result they worry and say we have to make sure that that idea's not heard because it's going to influence people, it's going to lead to disasters. and i understand the faeshz. there's a lot of terrible ideas out there. there's a lot of terrible politicians running around. but if you believe in democracy as i do, you've got to believe that you're actually able to persuade people with the morally right and the factually right ideas. and the way to do that is not to make them scared, not to make them afraid, not to make them think if i somehow slip up and say something wrong, even if i'm as big a star as whoopi

goldberg, i'm just going to go and be banished and punished and so on. it is to actually have real discussions and point out forcefully why whoopi goldberg was wrong in her comment but also accept with grace when she says i've understood, i've made a mistake, and then also welcome her into the fold instead of this performative punishment which as cornel west was saying, serves ultimately the interests of the network more than ha of anybody else. >> the interesting thing is that we have this idea, what i said earlier, this sort of modern idea about what race is. what exactly is race? is it a social construct? many people see it as color. is it something that's visible? what exactly is it? let's have that conversation. we'll take a break, and we'll talk about it on the other side. we'll be right back.

my family's been devastated by covid-19. and we're not alone. we've all had to find new ways to keep going. and cue has made that easier. with cue, you get lab-quality covid-19 test results in just 20 minutes. speed and accuracy. it's just for the nba; it's for you too. cue health. the official covid-19 home test of the nba. go cue. go you.

if the klan is coming down the street and i'm standing with a jewish friend and kneeing oo -- neither one -- well, i'm going to run. but if my friend decides not to run, they'll get passed by most times because you can't tell who's jewish. it's not something that people say oh, that person is jewish or this person is jewish. so that's what i was trying to explain. >> that was whoopi, what she said when she went on colbert to clarify her holocaust comments. back with me now yascha mounk and professor cornel west. this whole thing is about having a conversation and getting people to learn, right? so professor, listen, quite honestly when i heard that i was actually getting dressed. i was in los angeles and i was

guessed dressed and i had it on in the background. and i kind of understood what she was saying. it was a little clumsy. she was talking about race as something you can see. and here in america especially as people of color we get that. but that is not always the case. not all jewish people present as white. like jonathan greenblatt said that on this very program last night. >> that's right. >> but the nazis said that jewish people were a race, the reason for the stars, they wanted to be able to identify them. they saw them as an inferior race. that's the lesson in it here. talk to me about that. you can understand why people can see where she's coming from with that part of it. but it was clumsy. >> no, that's true. we know the klan was founded against catholics, jews and then especially blacks. but it was actually all-inclusive in that sense. and it's also true that even during the holocaust, you know,

it was against slavic folk too. i mentioned the poles and the russians were viewed as inferior. they had black germans there. they were viewed as inferior. but jews were targeted by the gangster fascists in germany. in the united states you have an attempt of many jews to assimilate and too often become identified with the gentiles, with the goyim, as it were. and yet the deep anti-jmt ewish sensibilities in america make it very difficult for there to ever be full-fledged jewish assimilation within the white mainstream. but when it comes to caste-like treatment of black people the black predicament is very different from the white jewish predicament in america. so that's part of what she's trying to get at but she was clumsy about it. >> race is a social construct. do you guys agree with that or disagree

i agree with that. it is real and biological or it has no basis in reality at all. that's the wrong way to think about it. >> there is real world consequences for it. people died because of their race even though it is something that people constructed. >> there are ethnic differences. you can guess if somebody has ancestors in africa or asia or europe. the way in which we think about the difference in racism is constructed. that's what is relevant in this context. in the united states. traditionally the most important line is whether somebody is black or not black. that determines whether

somebody was a slave or somebody's life may have been violated in the most extreme way. there's different context in the world in which different thinkings about race is more salient. life against jews in german. >> do you want to continue with that, professor west? as our definition of racism changed? >> one it is institutionalized and legalized. it takes on a life of its own, you see. the white supremacy of the construct and acribed in the laws and acribed in the black beauty and black intelligence and indigenous people it gets institutionalized. then that lie become as lie. because you got institutions

that are reinforcing it. it is rooted and predatory expansion looking for resources and using black bodies and black people as labor to ensure that they gain access to big money and then made the law of the land. hundreds of years. it can't not but have consequences. >> yasha, how do we do this in the short time left? we will continue this conversation. but i want to know, i don't believe when people say cancel culture there is consequences and i think intent is important and there is not a dumb question because that is how you learn. when you ask a question and no matter how dumb people think it is. how do we navigate these conversations without fear? what do we do? >> we have to have more trust

with each other and people say something because they believe it and not bad actors or human beings and trying to express themselves and trying to understand the world. if you agree with them then the right solution is not to shut them up, it is to express disagreement and why you are offended by something and to express why so many je ws were hurt and she apologized. one of the consequences of living in a democracy in the end people have a secret vote. if we try to change the culture after country and try to change what people believe and how they feel for punishing them for expressing their ideas they will take it to the group and vote for people for the democratic institutions. it is better to allow them to speak and agree with them and

explain why they should have a different consequence. i have been saying all along in talking about even to you about this, professor, during the election as far back as 2016-2017, people need to realize who their allies are and sometimes allies say really stupid things, right? as a gay black man. sometimes our allies are saying insulting things, at the end of the day i understand that they are an alli and the chances of you getting through to them are greater than getting through to someone that is a bigot or not an alli and we need to realize who they are and not try to push them aside and not try to cancel them. that's all i've got to say. >> it has to be earned. >> right. >> you have to know who your allies are. >> in terms of execution following through. >> yasha. >> thank you, will you please come back. i want to continue the conversation.

>> professor, i know you will be back. thank you, sir. >> blessed to be with both of you. both of you brothers. >> on market events. that's decision tech. only from fidelity. ♪ my name is austin james. as a musician living with diabetes, fingersticks can be a real challenge. that's why i use the freestyle libre 2 system. with a painless, one-second scan i know my glucose numbers without fingersticks. now i'm managing my diabetes better and i've lowered my a1c from 8.2 to 6.7. take the mystery out of managing your diabetes and lower your a1c. now you know. try it for free at freestylelibre.us

♪ life can be a lot to handle. ♪ this magic moment ♪ but heinz knows there's plenty of magic in all that chaos. ♪ so different and so new ♪ ♪ was like any other... ♪ (vo) when you are shopping for a new vehicle, how do you know which brand you can trust? with subaru, you get kelley blue book's most trusted brand winner, seven years in a row. in fact, subaru has won most trusted brand for more consecutive years than any other brand. no wonder kelley blue book also picked subaru as their best overall brand. once again. it's easy to love a brand you can trust. it's easy to love a subaru.

as a professional bull-rider i'm used to taking chances. but when it comes to my insurance i don't. i use liberty mutual, they customize your car insurance, so you only pay for what you need. wooo, yeaa, woooooo and, by switching you could even save 665 dollars. hey tex, can someone else get a turn? yeah, hang on, i'm about to break my own record. yeah. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. ♪