good evening. i'm wolf blitzer in washington sitting in for anderson. tonight two major new developments in the wake of cassidy hutchinson's bombshell testimony before the house january 6th select committee. one appears to bolster a disputed piece she told the panel. the other concerns potential witness tampering concerns raised by liz cheney in her closing remarks on tuesday. >> our committee commonly asks witnesses connected to mr. trump's administration or campaign whether they have been contacted by any of their former

colleagues or anyone else who attempted to influence or impact their testimony. without identifying any of the individuals involved, let me show you a couple of samples of answers we received to this question. this is a call received by one of our witnesses. quote, a person let me know you have your deposition tomorrow. he wants me to let you know he's thinking about you. he knows you're loyal, and you're going to do the right thing when you go in for your deposition. i think most americans know that attempting to influence witnesses to testify untruthfully presents very serious concerns. >> tonight, cnn has learned that this example and one other example that congresswoman cheney highlighted were both directed at cassidy hutchinson. cnn has also learned more about this, ms. hutchinson's testimony about what fellow white house

staffer anthony renato told her in the presence of secret service head of detail on january 6th. it was about the ride the former president wanted to take to the u.s. capitol and what happened when he was told no. >> the president had very strong, very angry response to that. tony described him as being irate. the president said something to the effect of, i'm the f'ing president, take me up to the capitol now. to which bobby responded, sir, we have to go back to the west wing. the president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel. mr. engle grabbed his arm and said, sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel. we're going back to the west wing. we're not going to the capitol. mr. trump then used his free hand to lung towards bobby

engel. and when mr. renato had recounted the story to me, he had motioned towards his clavicles. >> and was mr. engel in the room as mr. renato told you this story? >> he was. >> did mr. engel correct or disagree with any part of this story from mr. ornato? >> he did not. >> did they after that tell you what mr. ornato had just said was untrue? >> neither mr. ornato nor mr. engel ever told me it was untrue. >> so there's new reporting on that tonight as well as the apparent attempt to influence ms. hutchinson's testimony. cnn's ryan nobles is up on capitol hill for was more. what more are you learning about that alleged incident in the presidential suv back on january 6th? >> reporter: well, of course if

you know that this is in dispute because soon after hutchinson's testimony, officials from the secret service started coming out saying they were prepared to refute part of what she had to say and they also followed up by saying both tony and bobby, the two agents in question would will willing to testify under oath and dispute part of what she said, specifically, that the former president made an effort to grab ahold of the steering wheel and there was some sort of physical altercation with bobby engel. what we have learned talking to two individuals who worked in the secret service in the months after january 6th told noah that this was a story that was passed around for quite some time. within the agency, that many agents had heard this story about a president who was angry in the presidential suv on january 6th and demand to go to the capitol. one of those sources even said that the story did include parts that showed that the president was lunging towards the front

seat. there is some dispute about whether or not he got ahold of the steering wheel or contact with any of the agents, but the one thing that is definitively clear and that no one has disputed, wolf, that the president was angry and he wanted to go to the capitol. and that is what the january 6th select committee is most focused on. we should also point out one of the sources that talked to noah also talked to the driver of the presidential suv, so that is a firsthand account from someone who was in the limo when it happened. >> very significant new information indeed. ryan, you also i understand have new details about who may have tried to actually influence hutchinson's testimony. what can you tell us about that? >> yeah, that's right, wolf. this of course a big concern for the january 6th select committee because they want to make sure that they're getting accurate information, that it's not shaded in any way, shape or form by the former president or his allies. we have learned that those two examples liz cheney provided on the end of the january 6th

select committee hearing on tuesday were both directed at cassidy hutchinson, their star witness. and furthermore, we've learned that at least one of those examples was delivered through an intermediary of mark meadows. at least that's what the committee believes. now mark meadows through his spokesperson, ben williamson said to cnn they emphatically denied that meadows or anyone in his orbit made any attempt to influence hutchinson or her testimony, but this is something that the committee is keeping a close eye on. there's a report in the new york times this week that outlines how any of these witnesses, coming before the january 6th committee, their lawyers are being paid for by organizations with close ties to the former president. the committee has to work very hard to make sure there is no undue influence in this testimony. they view that to be a serious problem. and of course, keep in mind, wolf, if they find direct evidence that witnesses were targeted and intimidated with the express purpose of not telling the truth, well, that could lead to a crime. wolf? >> excellent new reporting, ryan

nobles, thank you very, very much. joining us now, the author of a book to end the presidency, the power of impeachment. there you see the cover. professor tribe, thank you so much for joining us. thanks for all your important work over the years. you heard that new reporting from ryan nobles, our correspondent up on capitol hill. what is this new avenue, potential witness tampering actually mean for the investigation both for the committee and potentially for the department of justice? >> well, it means that in addition to the very serious crimes of inciting and aiding and abetting insurrection and seditious conspiracy that appear to have been committed by the president's circle and perhaps the president himself in the leadup to the january 6th attack on the capitol, in addition to that, we now have essentially in real time, the very serious federal felony of witness

tampering and witness intimidation under 18 u.s. codes section 15-12 b, that is sentenced to something like 20 years, 30 years in prison. and it's serious, and it really puts a special light on the courageous testimony of this young woman. she is under threats. they're implicit. they're like, oh, what a nice little dog you have there. they are essentially god father four. i don't know which role marlin brando would play, whether he would be the president or whether he would be mark meadows, but this is serious stuff. she clearly has every incentive to tell the truth because instead of being rewarded for what she's saying, she's being threatened, and she's saying it anyway. she's also a loyal trump supporter. she's been with him all the time.

so what's her incentive to lie? and these guys well, it didn't happen exactly the way she says. they're not testifying under oath, and they really are part of the trump cult. so i think we see serious witness tampering that the department of justice absolutely has to investigate urgently and seriously. >> but professor, let me interrupt for a second. how difficult is it to make a legal case for witness tampering? what is needed for proof? >> essentially an overt act, a statement that a reasonable person would understand as a threat or as an offer to treat one more favorably if one gives favorable testimony. it's really not that difficult. it's not rocket science. witness tampering is part of the stock and trade of criminal prosecutors in mob cases and we

racketeering cases with great frequency. we almost never have such dramatic evidence of it. we haven't seen it all yet. i understand the committee has developed and is developing still further corroboration. and the people who know the truth and have something to gain by hiding it are hiding. they're taking the fifth or they're refusing to show up. this is extremely distressing, because, you know, we've never had a sitting president try to overthrow the government so that he could stay in power. and we've certainly never had one who when investigated for that basically wields power as though he were still president and as though he is accountable to no one. unless he is held accountable, our democracy is in grave danger because -- >> so what -- >> if he can get away -- >> let me just point out, based on what we know now, professor tribe, do you believe the u.s. justice department will try to

bring an indictment against the former president related to these events of january 6th? >> well, i wish i knew. but merrick garland is a friend and a former student of mine. he is an honest man. he's serious. he said he would go to the top if that's where the evidence points, and there's indication certainly from the searches and seizures of both john eastman and of others, strong evidence that the justice department is not stopping with the foot soldiers. it's going to be generals. and the biggest general of all of course is donald trump. i do think the odds are he will be indicted. >> so you think merrick garland, the attorney general of the united states will indict the former president of the united states? >> if i had to guess, that would be my guess. >> what are the main hurdles right now, professor tribe, to pursuing an actual indictment of trump? if you were making a case

against the former president, where would you be concerned? >> well, i would be concerned of course with the possibility of a hung jury, someone who basically believes with trump that he can do no wrong. but i would think it would be worth having an indictment any way. i certainly recognize that indicting a former president would generate lots of social heat, perhaps violence, but not indicting him would invite another violent insurrection. i would be weighing two terrible choices, but it's clear to me, if i were the attorney general, which is worse. it's worse to say the president of the united states can hold on to power, do whatever it takes in order to prevent the transition, the peaceful transition of power for the first time in our history and get away with it. because once that has happened, democracy is at an end. >> strong words indeed. if the former white house

counsel, before i let you go, professor tribe, if the former white house counsel pat cipollone does wind up sitting for a limited deposition with the january 6th select committee, what's the first question you would want him to be asked? >> i would ask him whether the accounts of the president's urgent desire to join a mob that he knew was armed and that he knew and said was not armed to get him, whether his desire to join them in the capitol as reported by many witnesses, whether that is what he observed himself. and there's no executive privilege that would prevent him from answering that question. >> well, we will see what happens. these are very dramatic moments indeed. professor tribe, thank you for joining us. i want to continue this conversation with you down the road. >> thank you. i'd like that. >> thank you. so from having perhaps the most powerful job inside the white house to being right at the center of a political and legal storm that now appears to be

growing, mark meadows who was trump's white house chief of staff has certainly come quite a distance over the last year and a half. with more on that and his journey leading up to it, here is "360" randi kaye. >> i stand for life, liberty, and lower taxes. as we look at that, i'm unapoll unapologetically pro-life. >> that was mark meadows long before he aligned himself with donald trump. a year later, meadows was elected to the house of representatives from north carolina's 11th congressional district. for meadows, it was a meteoric rise in congress. in 2013, just eight months into his freshman term, he became known as the architect of the government shutdown. he gained significant influence as chairman of the freedom caucus, a coalition that included dozens of conservative house republicans. >> i believe i'm representing the will of the people. >> in 2015, he used his influence to lead an effort to oust then speaker of the house

john boehner from his leadership role. >> rose through the ranks of the republican party by doing the difficult work and advocating for republican policies. >> years later, when donald trump was in the white house, meadows seemed to have his back, introducing a resolution to impeach deputy attorney general rob rosenstein. at the time rosenstein was supervising special counsel robert mueller's investigation into the interference in the 2016 election. eventually in march 2020, trump hand-picked meadows to be his fourth and final chief of staff. >> as is always the case of those who get too close to donald trump, he asks for too much. he demands too much loyalty. he expects these people to cross lines that should never be crossed, ethically or morally, in particular as it relates to january 6th. >> mark meadows has turned over more than 6,000 documents to the january 6th committee but has refused to cooperate beyond that.

>> the president has claimed executive privilege. i'm going to honor that. >> but the committee has questions, lots of them. there's the issue of meadows' lack of urgency on january 6th as described by his top aid, cassidy hutchinson. >> i was surprised he wasn't a little bit more alarmed and wasn't a little bit more aggressive in requesting for the former president to call off the protest at the capitol. >> meadows did share hundreds of text messages with the committee including some texts he exchanged with january 6th rally organizers and with others in trump's inner circle, calling on him to stop the january 6th attack. in one text message with a member of congress, meadows writes, "i love it" about a plan for schlechting a group of alternate trump selectors. he pushed a bunked conspiracy theory about the 2020 election being stolen. at one point, contacting national security officials with what he said was potential

evidence of china hijacking the u.s. election by using thermostats to change voting machine results. that's according to two sources with direct knowledge of the situation. >> i'm not surprised that he would go to these extreme lengths to please president trump. it does not surprise me, but it disappoints me because i thought he was better than that. >> and now meadows has gone silent. his lawyer declining our request for comment. >> clearly what's happened in recent weeks is i think not only done damage to the president, but those closest to him like mark meadows. now all that stink has splashed up on him, and you can't wash away the stink. >> randi kaye, cnn, palm beach county, florida. up next, liz cheney's uphill battle to keep her seat in the u.s. congress and what it says about today's political climate here in the united states. later, with brittney

griner's trial now underway in moscow after nearly five months in captivity, an exclusive conversation with her wife about how the wnba star is holding up. we'll be right back. when you have technology that's easier to control... that can scale across all your clouds... we got that right? yeah, we got that. it's easier to be an innovator. so you can do more incredible things. [whistling]

ugh-stipated... feeling weighed down by a backedup gut" miralax is different. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut. ...free your gut. and your mood will follow.

for a lawmaker who's both in the national spotlight for her role in widely viewed televised hearings and the owner of one of the most storied family names in politics, liz cheney is sure not benefitting from either. she is struggling right now just to keep her job. and the reasons why speak volumes about where the country and the republican party for that matter are right now. last night, she faced off against her primary opponents in a debate where disproven beliefs about the 2020 election lie ran very deep. >> i think that in woke woke we i think that in wyoming we have tremendously secure elections.

i also know that the truth matters. and the claims that mrs. hagaman is making about the 2020 elections are the same claims for which the president's lead lawyer rudy giuliani was disbarred. they're the same claims for which sidney powell has had her law license suspended. it is simply not true. it is not true that there was sufficient fraud to change the results of the 2020 election. now if mrs. hagman is standing up her claiming that the election was stolen or there is fraud sufficient to overrun the election, she ought to say it. otherwise, she needs to stop making claims that are not true and tell the people of woke woke the truth. >> the opponent she's referring harriet hagaman is endorsed by the former president. the other candidates also criticized the january 6th committee and cast doubt on the 2020 presidential election. some also raised unfounded positions about dr. anthony fauci and covid vaccines.

for that matter as well. another suggested that the united states pushed ukraine into, quote, being against the russian government despite the fact that it was russia of course that invaded ukraine. the answers say a lot about modern politics right now and liz cheney's estrangement from it. let's discuss with cnn political commentator s.e. cupp. thank you so much for joining us. what does it say right now about the state of the republican party that congresswoman cheney, someone who is very conservative, a lifeline republican may end up losing her seat in congress to a candidate who espouses those lies? >> well, in some ways it doesn't say much more than we already knew, right, which is that republicans who take on trump don't tend to be long for this world in the republican party. and they are marginalized and attacked by other republicans.

that looks to be what will happen in her home state of wyoming, which voted for trump percentage-wise more than any other state in the union, which says a lot. but listen. some time ago the republican party decided to jettison conservatism for trumpism. and this effort to sort of decapitate never trumpers or republicans who took on trump and then parade their severed heads around became much more interesting and satisfying even than taking on democrats. the opposition party. so there's been some giddiness in trying to primary and get rid of people like liz cheney. and by going into the jan 6 committee, i think she really put a huge target on her back. i think it's good that she did that, and she probably did that knowing that it would sacrifice her political career in congress.

but i think she did it because it was the right thing to do. >> if congresswoman cheney loses her seat in august, then what? could her clout on the committee or her moral high ground in general be impacted while she is in that lame duck period, or frankly, could she even be empowered to speak her own mind? could she be even more empowered, i should say. >> right. i've been talking to folks on the hill, both democrats and republicans. there is cynicism. there is this idea she must want something out of this. there must be some reason she is doing this, because why would anyone just do anything for the good of it. it's hard for me to find a got alternative motive for her. she's not dumb. i think she knows she'll probably lose in wyoming. and looking ahead to the future, 2024, i'm not sure what natural constituencies there are for liz cheney. i always have to remind people, as much you would celebrate her

rightly for taking on donald trump on the jan 6 committee, she is very conservative, far more conservative than many people probably know. so i think the folks that like her now for her courage are probably not her voters, and on the right she's become sort of traitorous. i don't think she's got a long game or a short game. i think her game isn't a game at all. she really wants to tell the truth. and if anything, provide a road map for other republicans to speak out and use this kind of messaging, right. she said that the truth matters. she's called donald trump a domestic threat. i think she wants to give permission to other republicans to talk that way, to talk that honestly about donald trump whatever happens to her after that. >> she's got a lot of courage. no doubt about that. it's already very rare, as you know, s.e., for a republican in office to call out trump's lies. if congresswoman cheney loses along with congressman adam

kinzinger, he chose not to even run again to seek reelection, will that short of pushback be almost nonexistent among members of the gop? >> they are two of the most public faces of the right-wing resistance in congress. over in the senate, you have mitt romney from time to time and he has a few more years before he has to run again, but certainly the numbers are dwindling which has made what liz cheney and what adam kinzinger have done all the more remarkable. as the january 6th committee hearings go on, maybe you'll find some more courage. you're certainly seeing some more pushback against trump from the right, even from among his own quote, unquote team. and over at fox news. so i guess you could see some more. but listen, losing a liz cheney, losing an adam kinzinger i think are going to be devastating for

the party. not if you ask the party, but for the health of this nation and our democracy. >> yeah, kinzinger and cheney, they both deserve an enormous amount of credit for doing what they are doing. s.e. cupp, thank you so much for coming in and joining us. after being detained for more than four months in russia, we now have new details in the trial for wnba star brittney griner. also, cnn spoke exclusively with her wife who's calling on the biden administration to bring her home. we'll be right back. where your dad waited for his dad to come home from the factory. is this where they gathered on their front steps with fats domino on the breeze? ancestry can guide you to family discoveries in the 1950 census. see what you can uncover at ancestry.

the unknown is not empty. it's a storm that crashes, and consumes, replacing thought with worry. but one thing can calm uncertainty. an answer. uncovered through exploration, teamwork, and innovation. an answer that leads to even more answers. mayo clinic. you know where to go.

my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... the burning, itching. the pain. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®, most people saw 90% clearer skin at 16 weeks. the majority of people saw 90% clearer skin even at 5 years. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®. ask your doctor about tremfya® today. to finally lose 80 pounds and keep it off with golo

is amazing. i've been maintaining. the weight is gone and it's never coming back. with golo, i've not only kept off the weight but i'm happier, i'm healthier, and i have a new lease on life. golo is the only thing that will let you lose weight and keep it off. who loses 138 pounds in nine months? i did! golo's a lifestyle change and you make the change and it stays off. (soft music) there's a reason comcast business powers more businesses than any other provider. actually, there's a few... comcast business offers the fastest, reliable network... the protection of securityedge™ and the most reliable 5g network. want me to keep going? i can... whether your small business is starting or growing, you need comcast business. technology solutions that put you ahead. get a great offer on internet and security, now with more speed and more bandwidth. plus find out how to get up to a $650 prepaid card with a qualifying bundle.

today, the world got a brief glimpse of brittney griner heading to a moscow courtroom. the wnba star has spent more than 130 days in prison after russian authorities say they found two cartridges of cannabis oil equalling less than one gram in her luggage at the airport. the offense in russia is punishable by up to ten years in prison. the u.s. believes she is being quote, wrongfully detained. the u.s. embassy says griner is in, quote, good spirits and is keeping up the faith right now. griner declined to share her thoughts on the charge, at least at this moment. in an exclusive interview, griner's wife expressed how hard it's been waiting for answers. >> it's really difficult. it's really, really difficult.

this is not a situation where the rhetoric is matching the action. it's been the hardest thing to balance because i can't let up because it's 100. it's over 130 days, and bg's still not back. >> joining us now cnn senior political correspondent, the anchor of "inside politics sunday", abbey phillips. a great interview you did with cherelle griner. tell us what she told you about this dire situation underway right now. >> yeah, wolf, the start of the trial today in russia is really the beginning of a process that cherelle griner knows is going to be a lengthy one, and one that she is clear-eyed is unlikely to end in a positive way for her wife. she repeated this figure to me, 99%. 99% of criminal trials in russia end in a conviction. so there's an awareness there that at the end of this process, it is very unlikely that

brittney griner is going to be acquitted. one thing to keep in mind about cherelle griner is she is actually a lawyer herself, and she's very clear eyed that this kind of legal process is not like what we are used to in the united states. so with that knowledge, she's advised her wife to approach it very differently. take a listen. >> i want people to try and put themselves in her shoes and just think about the fact that, you know, this is not our typical system. so bg is not walking into a situation where there is a balance of justice. she's walking into a situation where their judicial system has a 99% conviction rate. so in their system, there is no innocent. in their system, it's guilty. so she's having to make decisions that are -- that's

going to preserve her physical and mental health right now. so just, you know, be gracious in understanding that she's having to navigate something totally different than what an american would have to navigate in a judicial system -- in our judicial system here. to them, they're treating her like a princess, basically because they do things differently. i'm not trying to bash what they do, but i don't agree with it. i don't think they're treating her in a way that they could be considered harshly. i think they think they're treating her as best as their system allows, which should tell you a lot, because i think that's terrible still. >> what could the biden administration do today to demonstrate to you that they're really on it? >> well, again, you know, for me, we're at 130 days, and so

the only thing the biden administration can do for me is getting my wife back to be very honest and frank with you. >> she is talking to her wife pretty regularly. they have been writing letters to one another. she's been talking to brittney griner about what is coming up. one of the things that was kind of left unsaid there was how brittney griner is going to be pleading in this case in russia. one of the things that you don't hear cherelle griner talking too much about is trying to litigate the facts of the arrest, this accusation that she's being charged with. and one of the reasons for that is because she believes that at the end of the day, that is not what's going to get brittney griner out. she thinks what's going to get her wife out of russia is a deal that's brokered by the united states government and the

russian government, plaps a trade of one prisoner for another or one prisoner for two. remember, paul whelan, another american is still in russia as well. so that's what she is pushing for is a conversation with president biden and for the united states government to put a deal on the table with russia. because at the end of the day, they do not believe that at the end of this process there can be an acquittal of any kind in a justice system that she doesn't really, as you can hear there, have a whole lot of confidence in, wolf. >> bottom line, is cherelle griner -- and you did an excellent interview with her. very moving. is she disappointed in the biden administration's efforts so far to secure her wife's release? >> she said that she is. she says that they can do more to demonstrate that they actually are doing what they say they are doing. she's pretty disappointed. they were supposed to have a phone call about a week and a half ago for their anniversary. they weren't able to have that phone call. than phone call still has not

happened, wolf, and i think that's contributing to her sense that the administration can certainly do more. >> let's hope it happens. abby phillip, thank you so, so much. and i know you're going to be having a lot more coming up on your show, "inside politics" sunday on this important interview, 8:00 a.m. eastern sunday morning. we'll of course all by watching. up next, across the nation, more than a dozen states are now in the midst of a legal battle over abortion bans. and some states are actually closing down their clinics. others are preparing for an influx of patients from across state lines. we have details when we come back. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut. ...free your gut. and your mood will follow. my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... the burning, itching. the pain. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®, most people saw 90% clearer skin at 16 weeks. the majority of people saw 90% clearer skin even at 5 years.

serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®... ask your doctor about tremfya® today. meet ron. that man is always on. and he's on it with jardiance for type 2 diabetes. his underhand sky serve? on fire. his grilling game? on point. and his a1c? ron is on it.

with the once-daily pill, jardiance. jardiance not only lowers a1c... it goes beyond to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease. and jardiance may help you lose some weight. jardiance may cause serious side effects, including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration that can lead to sudden worsening of kidney function, and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection, ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction, and don't take it if you're on dialysis. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. a once-daily pill that goes beyond lowering a1c? on it with jardiance. ask your doctor about jardiance.

legal fights are now underway in more than a dozen states over abortion bans and limits. the latest in oklahoma are provider groups are asking the state supreme court to block a reroe abortion ban that's more than a century old. they're also asking for an end to a criminal abortion law enacted this year. earlier this week, west virginia providers also sued to end the enforcement of a pre-roe ban in that state.

all this comes after president biden today working with democratic governors working to protect access to reproductive health care. he called on congress to enact abortion rights. >> ultimately, congress is going to have to act to codify the roe into federal law. as i said yesterday, the filibuster should not stand in the way of us being able to do that. the choice is clear. we either elect federal senators and representatives who will codify roe or republicans who will elect the house and senate will try to ban abortions nationwide. >> but right now with more states increasing abortion restrictions, some women are forced to travel across state lines just to receive services. it's expected to put a strain on some clinics. cnn's adrienne broaddus has the story. >> reporter: they come by car and by plane to this bloomington, minnesota clinic, opened for its access to

transportation arteries connecting minnesota with states banning abortion. >> some patients may fly, some patients may prefer to drive. so being near the highways that we are and the airport in bloomington really gives patients the most options. >> now, whole women's health is one clinic bracing to treat more patients with i-35 connecting it to three of the states with the most restrictive abortion laws, including texas and south dakota right next door. planned parenthood ceo sarah states is also bracing for an influx. >> we expect to see a minimum of 10 to 25% more people coming, seeking abortion. >> can you guys handle the increase? >> i don't know if we're going to be able to handle the increase. there is already a health care worker shortage, and we have been struggling with that since the beginning of the pandemic. that hasn't gone away. >> and that worries liz van he'll.

>> i always actually thought i'd have two boys. >> who knows the challenge of seeking this type of health care even before the supreme court overturned roe v. wade. six years ago, van heel says she and her husband went in for an ultrasound and left devastated. >> it was friday the 13th that my doctor told me the news that this baby was incompatible with life. that's when i decided i wanted an abortion as soon as possible. >> van heel says her unborn baby had a neural tube defect, meaning her baby's brain didn't fully develop. >> and that diagnosis meant that i would either miscarry at any time or that moments after i gave birth, the baby would die. i knew that continuing to carry a baby that was not compatible with life was not good to be good for my mental or emotional health. >> reporter: the minneapolis mother, who later had a healthy child, is worried women like her will have an even tougher time getting an abortion. >> that is worrisome.

i would be honored to be a resource for anyone that needs it. >> planned parenthood says it's hearing from people like van heel, offering to be a resource for those who live far from airports or don't have cars. >> someone reached out to me who owns a plane who wants to organize a lot of her friends and others around the country who also have small planes and can land in rural parts of the country and can safely transport women to larger urban centers. >> but even for people with transportation, planned parenthood expects appointments will be in short supply. >> i do think we'll see more use of abortion pills by mail because appointments are going to be difficult to get. >> and planned parenthood told us that on monday, the first business day after the scotus decision, it received its highest volume of calls ever, up 50% with most of those callers from out of state.

additionally, the ceo you heard from the story, sarah states says she took about one thousand calls last saturday from people volunteering to help. wolf? >> adrienne broaddus, thank you so much for that report. coming up, tragedy in ukraine right now after yet another deadly russian missile attack struck a residential apartment complex. the latest on the war and the new military aid from the united states when "360" returns. when you have technology that's easier to control... that can scale across all your clouds... we got that right? yeah, we got that. it's easier to be an innovator. so you can do more incredible things. [whistling]

there's a monster problem and our hero needs solutions. so she starts a miro to brainstorm. “shoot it?” suggests the scientists. so they shoot it. hmm... back to the miro board. dave says “feed it?” and dave feeds it. just then our hero has a breakthrough. "shoot it, camera, shoot a movie!" and so our humble team saves the day by working together. on miro. (vo) red lobster's seafood summerfest is fire! turn up for our new! bbq bacon grilled shrimp with your choice of soup or salad and an individual starter all three courses for $18.99! hurry into red lobster. it's lit!

as the u.s. authorizes another $820 million in military aid for ukraine, officials there are reeling from yet another deadly missile attack by the russians. this time in the southern city of odesa. at least 21 are dead, 40 injured after the early morning attack that hit a residential apartment complex and a community center. one of the dead, a child. ukraine says one of the buildings actually struck in the attack was a rehabilitation center for children with health problems.

an employee there was killed. five were injured. the attack comes a day after russians withdrew from snake island, the site of one of the most memorable early clashes in this brutal war. >> cnn's scott mcclain is joining us from kyiv with the latest. once again the russians have struck mostly residential targets. what are ukrainian officials saying about the damage right now? >> reporter: well, this is why the ukrainians continue to refer to russia as a terror state because they continue to target these civilian areas. this was actually in the odesa region in a village right along the coastline. we're talking about sites that clearly have no military value, and the ukrainians say that there were no military sites around them either. as you mentioned, a nine-story apartment building, a children's rehabilitation facility, and a summer camp as well. the type of missile used here as well would have been fired from an airplane over the black sea.

it's the same type of missile, according to the president, that was used in that mall attack in kremenchuk. this is the type of missile that could sink a military ship, clearly not meant to be fired into these civilian areas at all. but that is what we are seeing here. what the intended target is -- because this type of missile is not quite as accurate as the more modern varieties. what the intended target is is not entirely clear. but one thing that stood out to me is the area these were fired in is only about five miles or so from a very critical bridge, the only rail link from the far southwest corner of ukraine and the rest of the country. this is a bridge the russians have hit over and over again over the course of this war. these missiles can strike anywhere in the country, wolf, as we're finding out, and the ukrainians have been asking for more and more air defense systems. and it seems like they're getting that from the united states, which has just been announced tonight.

as part of this deal, they are also getting more ammunition and radar systems as well. i should point out that the russians continue to insist that they don't hit civilian sites, reiterating what president putin said earlier this week that they don't need to. they say that they have the technology, they have the intelligence to know exactly what they're aiming at and to be able to hit it with precision. but clearly this is just one more example of the fact that that's not true. they continue to hit hospitals, schools, apartment buildings. the list goes on, wolf. >> yeah, they hit a shopping mall just the other day, killing a whole bunch of people as well. is there any indication these strikes could have been some form of retribution for the ukrainians recapturing what's called snake island? >> reporter: it is really unclear. it's really difficult to get inside vladimir putin's mind. but snake island makes it much

more difficult, wolf, to hit the odesa region. it's one less launch pad that the russians have to strike this region that really they have not been able to reach by land. there are plenty of land or natural barriers and also ukrainian resistance that have prevented the russians from getting anywhere close to odesa. and so instead they've resorted to lobbing missiles in that direction. the ukrainians hope there is at least less shelling going into odesa region now that snake island is back in their hands. >> thanks very much. stay safe over there. we'll be right back. enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative. my go to toothpaste is going to be pronamel repair. ugh-stipated... feeling weighed down by a backedup gut" miralax is different. it works naturally with the water in your body to unblock your gut. ...free your gut. and your mood will follow.

♪ ♪ is this where your grandparents cut a rug with a jitterbug? or return from war, dreaming of the possibilities ahead. where your dad waited for his dad to come home from the factory. is this where they gathered on their front steps with fats domino on the breeze? ancestry can guide you to family discoveries in the 1950 census. see what you can uncover at ancestry.

if you don't have plans for the fourth of july, cnn has you covered. starting at 7:00 p.m. eastern cnn will celebrate the 246th anniversary of our nation's independence with our special "the fourth in america" right here on cnn until 1:00 a.m. eastern. in the meantime, that's it for me. thanks for watching. the news continues. so let's hand it over to sara sidner and "cnn tonight." wolf, thank you. good to see you. i am sara sidner and this is "cnn tonight." we're tracking developments relating to testimony from a former trump white house aide. how impactful cassidy hutchinson testimony has been. proof, the ongoing campaign to discredit her by donald trump himself and his allies since she went under oath to describe what she saw and heard on and around january 6th. now, they've been taking aim at