account. this is donald trump. this is a man who millions upon millions, tens upon millions of people in the country adore, support, and think there is a conspiracy against him by a bunch of, you know, very smart, urban, liberal, lawyer types who are out to get him. right? so one of the things i am struck by is while the department of justice has every legal right to do what it's doing, perhaps even a legal obligation, it is probably playing to donald trump's benefit. it is turning him into a victim. it is turning his, mobilizing his supporters. there's probably huge amounts of fundraising going on honestly the right because of all of this. looking at the big, bad, deep state is out to get me again. i would hope merrick garland who is a very honorable man would take into account the political effects here, which is you can't

win the battle and lose the war. you know? there is a -- if you discredit or politicize the justice department in the eyes of 60 million americans, you haven't gained that much even if you've got these classified documents. so that is the balance that i think and i'm sure they're thinking about, which is very difficult. because with anybody else you would just say, look. you broke the law or you seem to have broken the law. we have to get these documents back. >> what strikes me when you say that is the idea of obviously it is a bit of a damned if you do damned if you don't philosophy in having to think about these things but the idea of the battle versus the war one could say something quite similar, fareed, the idea of, you know, vilifying law enforcement and vilifying the agencies whose job it is to help support the enforcement of the law in the long run by doing that if you are a supporter of trump, if you are trump himself, those who are members of congress who believe

that there should be a benefit that extended to him in perpetuity, you know, there is still that challenge on that side. so i guess how does one reconcile? this is of course the $50 million question that i'm posing to you right now on this friday evening. how does one go about enforcing the law, showing no favor to one or political preference, etcetera, and then essentially overlook something because there might be a political backlash? >> well, we are having a very deep, philosophical conversation on network television. you are absolutely right. because what trump has done is he has politicized everything. nothing is -- it's all about him. and so any time anything, anyone attacks him, he is happy to take the whole institution down. he is happy to accuse the fbi, the justice department, if some judge rules against him, he is going to vilify the judge. so you face this problem, which

is that he has already done what you're describing. he has massively politicized all of this. there are people who say, you know, let justice be done and may the heavens fall. 16th century english jurist's line that people take. you know, i tend to think let's be real. we all want to be politically shrewed and exercise good judgment. you know, one of the things that even in not in this current incarnation but the supreme court used to have that sort of political judgment, which is you don't just look at everything solely by the letter of the law. you operate within the political context in a country with millions of people. and so all i'm saying is, i think there has to be a balance. at the end of the day as i say garland is a very serious guy and a very ethical and honorable guy. but what i would like to do, what i would like him to do is make sure that the majority of

the country continues to see him that way and continues to see the department that way. and if that means taking a few extra steps, for example, maybe coming on tv and explaining the dilemma and having exactly this conversation we're having and saying, look. i understand that this places us in an awkward position and i understand there are people -- here are the things we were looking at. don't leave it to these very cold statements and, you know, most people don't understand. as you were saying, explaining about the espionage act. most people don't get it. you know? the simple thing that donald trump says, the fbi raided my house. they broke into my safe. everybody is out to get me. so there's got to be some simple, compelling story on the other side. and somebody needs to maybe talk about it. don't just leave it to bland statements. >> well, i am one for a little bit of flavor in one's conversation. i will say that.

but, also, having been part of the justice department there is a set up for quite the catch-22 because we've seen in recent times what happened when people run to a podium hoping that transparency will be well received. we've seen the fallout there as well. fareed, i am so excited to talk to you tonight and very interested in seeing your special episode coming up of "fareed zakaria gps, the fall of kabul one year later" on this coming sunday at 10:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m. please don't miss it. thank you so much. >> thank you so much. i want to bring in now cnn's sara murray national security analyst steve hall and former deputy assistant attorney general harry litman. look, i've had a deep conversation with fareed. you all are next. i'd love to have this conversation with you all as well. sarah, i begin with you. you've been going through this search warrant meticulously. i'm wondering what more are you learning about what the fbi took from mar-a-lago and perhaps more

importantly why? >> i think what is striking is this is all coming after more than a year of wrangling and even after all these discussions about the documents and a subpoena to get the documents what they walked away with, with this search warrant, were 11 sets of classified information, so that includes one top-secret -- among the highest levels of classifications, four sets of top-secret documents, three sets of secret documents, three sets of confidential documents and of course something about the french president. we don't know what that is and some kind of document related to the pardon of roger stone. donald trump's long-time political strategist. so quite an array there. obviously not a ton of detail on what the documents actually are. >> on that last part, the second to last part, the penultimate, reflect my shakespearian vocabulary. let me ask you. we think about the search warrant and the idea of what they identified t is not like

roger stone getting some form of clemency or pardon was not known. i mean, he was pardoned before trump left office and he avoided that three-year prison sentence and prison term. so do you have, when you heard that as one of the possible documents, help us understand. is there a bridge that you could foresee of why that would be connected under a warrant like this? >> the short answer is no. they might have taken many things that were just described by the warrant though when i heard about the prime minister of france i thought, hum. is trump looking to blackmail? i really want to address a couple things that fareed said. you know, one that i agree with and have agreed with is it won't be enough just to show the facts and the law. there will be at the end of the day a best interests of the day analysis. second, however, the notion that, well, there are different violations under this statute and some are relatively benign, no, no, no. we are talking about materials. imagine that these are pieces of

plutonium and even if you carelessly smuggled them out the u.s. comes and says we need that plutonium back and you say, what plutonium? we need that plutonium back. you try to destroy it. this is inherently, by actual definition, dangerous to the united states' interests and very serious. finally, the point about publication. i take his point but it is nuanced because there the doj is damned if you do and damned if you don't. things they are protecting on the other side, integrity of the investigation, identity of the confidential informant, they uniquely can't willy nilly ignore which is why by the way the warrant was released with the redacted names of the fbi then trump released it with their names and now they are under assault and need special protection. >> you forgot one important part of course here, harry, that part of the reason you don't have these things public and don't have the doj and fbi fronting

the information about the search is because of the constitutional protections for the person who is being searched. that there is a presumption of innocence. there are the guard rails that ought to be there because as you know with the jury let alone court of public opinion, courtroom of law, the idea of the fbi, if there wasn't something, you know there is that benefit extended but on the one point you raise the idea of the president of france, some sort of blackmail. we don't have that information. you're thinking about it more broadly of what might be possibilities. we don't have that reporting or the information. but i want to go to you, steve, because the trump ally john solomon was just on fox news and actually read a new statement from trump's office. check this out. >> this is from president trump's office. it just came in a few minutes ago. as we can all relate to everyone, as we can all relate to, everyone ends up having to bring home their work from time to time. american presidents are no different. president trump in order to prepare the work the next day

often took documents including classified documents to the residence. he had a standing order. there is the word i've been looking for. that documents removed from the oval office and taken to the residents were deemed to be de classified the moment he removed them. the power to classify and de classify documents rests solely with the president of the united states. the idea that some paper pushing bureaucrat with classification authority delegated by the president need to approve the de classification is absurd. >> well, steve, what is the absurd part to you in that statement? >> where to begin? you know, i will certainly leave the issue as to whether the former president or any president can waive the proverbial -- wave the proverbial magic wand and make something classified no longer classified i'll leave to folks who understand better about that but the most absurd thing really about this and it gets to the question of okay.

what about the french and all of that, is the damage this continues to do to our foreign intelligence relationships. it was bad enough when trump was president and doing things like inviting the russian foreign minister to the oval office to talk about sensitive israeli intelligence which the israelis turned out to be quite upset about later on. it wasn't even our intelligence he was compromising but apparently israeli intelligence. so the hope and i think the thought was okay. well, this particular president and by the way it doesn't matter whether this is a democrat president or republican president. the party doesn't matter. doing these types of things is the problem. i think our foreign partners thought okay. when president trump leaves office at least we won't perhaps have to worry about it that much. but the problem is this all now coming up again and i think it reminds these very important foreign intelligence

relationships about some of the weaknesses in the american system or highlights them. overall our system is extremely good at protecting classified information but when the most senior person in the government the one who does and can de classify things shows he is not responsible as the president has done several times this is just a reminder it is going to cause our foreign allies to back off again a little bit i'm afraid. even though that president is no longer in power. >> sarah, i want to come back to you on this as well but harry, i have to say, look, yes. as working people we've all brought work home from time to time. i don't know about you. but i don't bring home top-secret or sci classified things. the idea of those scrutinized notions don't make sense to me. but, also, the word that's missing here in this conversation, harry, is it is one thing if the current president brought work home with him to the oval office or the white house residence. this is a former president who

has retained documents for whatever reason no longer living or residing at the white house. shouldn't that have occurred to the lawyers before making that statement? this is a former president we're talking about? >> it must have occurred in fact and people who helped and there had to be are possibly in the soup as well. again, we're talking about someone who -- there are people out there to back up what steve said, wicked people in the world who would love, might know about this, want to come steal it. he's got plutonium there and it is dangerous and he knows it because he is told again and again. anyone who has ever been can be divided between anyone ever in government and anyone who hasn't. anyone who has knows this classification is completely radioactive. you cannot even look at documents except in a secret room. they know how serious it is. >> you know, you must have

plutonium on the brain. must have been a high school periodic tables chart of some kind. i know there was. i know tungsten was w. sorry. that's all i got. i do want to know what else you're hearing from team trump tonight. >> you know, it is sort of interesting to see the statement come out from them tonight and use this as their explanation because they had a different explanation when a former trump national security official was on television earlier today. listen to what cash patel did. >> the gsa has since come out and said they mistakenly packed some boxes and moved them to mar-a-lago. that is not on the president but the national archives to sort that material out. >> a lot of different explanations from trump allies about what may have happened here and the gsa did respond by the way and said the responsibility for making decisions about what materials are moved rests entirely with the outgoing president i.e. this

is not our fault. but i do think it gets to the idea there are two issues here. one, what is the classification of these documents? two, even if you may have declassified these documents or believed that you declassified these documents as president, that doesn't mean that you still get to take home reams and reams of documents with you when you leave the white house and not abide by any of the presidential records. >> steve, what do you make of the idea this is somebody else's doing, it was, just happened to be there? i just think that myself, that the process by which you have gotten the documents to mar-a-lago would have involved a number of hands, a number of movers, etcetera. so there was access points all along that particular point in time. let alone blaming it on the gchl sa or otherwise, the national archives. we also know that the top justice department counter intelligence official has been involved in this case. and, also, visited mar-a-lago in june. i am wondering what collectively does that person's role and

their presence as a part of the investigation tell you about this very investigation? >> well, i'm not going to go plutonium but i'll go with another equally strange concept which is counterintelligence. i'm glad you mentioned it. let's not forget not only is this not the walking distance between the oval office and the residence in the white house. this is mar-a-lago a very popular destination. lots of people around. lots of people to include two chinese nationals who not too long ago tried, during trump's presidency, tried to get in and trespass and get past the security to get into that location. i don't think that is a coincidence. i think that foreign governments that are interested in targeting the united states and trying to spy on us know this kind of thing happens at mar-a-lago whether conversations that are extremely sensitive held in nonsensitive places or that type of documents or those types of documents, top-secret stored in the basement.

that is certainly not lost on people. i do think if we step away from the weeds a second there is one important question. and it's why? where is the narrative of innocence here? i mean, sure there's lots of people in the trump camp saying, well. it was gsa perhaps or it wasn't his fault or stuff just showed up. who knows how? where is a real serious explanation, innocent explanation that makes all of us, you know, in this country whether republican or democrat say, oh, okay. that makes perfect sense. now i understand why he would have taken that stuff to mar-a-lago. failing that i just don't understand it. and given trump's mishandling of classified previously, and thinking of rules that apply to him it is difficult for me to see an innocent narrative here. >> that is the important point. you wonder where the moment is during the course of the conversations. we believe you have information. oh, well come down and get everything. take it all. what are you talking about? i don't have anything here that

is a problem. that would be in many ways the normal response to say if you think i have it come and look. take everything i want. i don't need it. it's not for me. we haven't seen that yet. because we talked about it a number of times, harry, plutonium is number 94. okay? there you go. >> thank you. >> there will now be a jeopardy category on that very thing everyone. plutonium is not a laughing matter for the sake of the conversation everyone. thank you so much. >> thanks. look. there has been as you know, just yesterday, an attack on an fbi office. there's been violent calls for assassinations. now federal law enforcement is investigating an unprecedented number of threats. there is a new warning tonight.

woman tc: my a1c stayed here, it needed to be here. doctor tc: ruby's a1c is down with rybelsus®. man tc: my a1c wasn't at goal, now i'm down with rybelsus®. son tc: mom's a1c is down with rybelsus®. song: a1c down with rybelsus® anncr vo: in a clinical study, once-daily rybelsus® significantly lowered a1c better than the leading branded pill.

anncr vo: rybelsus® isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. anncr vo: don't take rybelsus® if you or your family ever had medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if allergic to it. anncr vo: stop rybelsus® and get medical help right away if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or an allergic reaction. anncr vo: serious side effects may include pancreatitis. gallbladder problems may occur. tell your provider about vision problems or changes. anncr vo: taking rybelsus® with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases low blood sugar risk. anncr vo: side effects like nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea may lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. mom tc: need to get your a1c down? song: a1c down with rybelsus® anncr vo: ask your healthcare provider about rybelsus® today.

tonight sources are saying the fbi's warning its 38,000 employees nationwide. 38,000 employees nationwide to remain vigilant. why? because there is a heightened threat environment following the search of mar-a-lago. the bureau's investigating an unprecedented number of threats made against personnel and property in the wake of the

search. i want to bring in cnn national security analyst, a former official in the department of homeland, good to see you this evening but my goodness. first of all, this threat level directed at members of the fbi. donie o'sullivan is reporting that trump's social media platform sent a push alert this afternoon to an article with an unredacted version of the search warrant. why is that important? because it included the names of two fbi agents and now they are being villainized on pro trump social media and there might be extraordinary danger now. just how extraordinary and how dangerous could this be? >> very. we just need to call it that. this is not a joke. and so much of trump's circle and inner circle and the family itself view life as sort of this

expendable thing for purposes of their political gain. they just throw this stuff out there. they know exactly what they're doing. i think it is incumbent on everyone to call them on it. you simply can no longer talk about both sides or talk about mere violence. this is a form of targeted assassination against two named fbi agents who were doing their jobs, who cares what their politics are, in issuing a search warrant against the president, former president of the united states, approved by a judge. is the judge also under attack? he is the board member of a synagogue. that synagogue had to close their services this weekend because of the threat. the trump family and i mean the family because the sons are on air doing this stuff. the trumps know exactly what they're doing. they are inciting the kill. and i am not afraid to say that. it is exactly what their intention is and that is why

they allow these platforms to repeat this information. >> i mean, just the idea, so we're clear on this, the fact that the director of the fbi has said his potentially number one priority now is the safety of law enforcement agents, i mean, you and i both know that means in some respects the more that the law enforcement and the fbi are dealing with the number of threats against them, they cannot be dealing with the number of threats against other matters. if you care about human trafficking, if you care about drugs and communities, you care about arms dealers and guns and all things are happening and crime at a larger scale, do we really want the fbi to be concerned about what might happen to them or doing what we hope they will do? >> right. exactly right. and their family. i mean, if you look at the cess pool it is not just them. it is a wife or a spouse or children. it is a personal address, and

phone numbers. if i sound like someone who has been the target of these kinds of attacks? yeah. not like these guys but they find your cell phone. they print this stuff. you're always conscious of the safety and security issues. but in this environment in which trump sort of -- trump's sort of violent core and i'm very clear these are not all trump supporters and certainly not all trump voters but that violent core saw monday night as the beginning of what they self-describe as a civil war. now, a rational human being if we had one in the former president would say, i shouldn't do anything to give them fuel to find the people who issued the warrant or approved the warrant or came to mar-a-lago. instead he does the opposite. and i just think it is just, i mean, it's no longer incitement. this is just directed violence at this stage. it is something we've never seen

before obviously from a former president. but certainly from a party that because they're not addressing it or condemning it, every well meaning honestly or even trump supporter gop member, people on our network who try to wiggle out of what's going on, i think it is really important that that failure to condemn the violence is actually what breeds it because it's not being chained. it is being nurtured, supported on these online efforts. there is just like you can't even, you know, at this stage it is very difficult to separate the sort of make america great movement with the violence now. and that's what we're going to have to do by protecting ourselves and law enforcement agents and focusing on the important things that matter, which is the sort of rule of law again in this country. >> it is unbelievable we're

talking about it to level. again, this harkens back. we were having this conversation several weeks ago when the dhs put out the bulletin talking about the greatest threats essentially they were focusing on were those from within the borders of this country. >> right. >> and the idea and reaction to political grievance and some sort of license people think they have that if you're angry about something politically that violence is a viable vehicle to do things. that's sort of the antithesis of what needed to happen for republic to be kept. >> right. >> we have to talk again i'm sure. it is unfortunate we are here now. >> unfortunately. >> thinking about those families and all the law enforcement impacted. needless to say, everyone, it's been a dramatic week. very dramatic week. i mean, it began with the search of trump's mar-a-lago residence. then you had the series of wins for president biden. you wonder how it is all going to play out with the midterms right around the corner. we'll talk about it next.

this... is the planning effect. this is how it feels to knknw you have a wealth plan that covers everything that's important to you. this is what it's like to have a dedicated fidelity advisor looking at your full financial picture. making sure you have the right balance of risk and reward. and helping you plan for future generations. this is "the planning effect" from fidelity.

(vo) with every generation, the subaru forester has been a leader in crash safety. working to undo the impact a crash can have on your life. which has led the forester to even be able to detect danger and stop itself. the subaru forester has earned the i-i-h-s top safety pick plus, nine times. more than honda cr-v and toyota rav4, combined. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru.

as a business owner, your bottom line is always top of mind. so start saving by switching to the mobile service designed for small business: comcast business mobile. flexible data plans mean you can get unlimited data or pay by the gig. all on the most reliable 5g network with no line activation fees or term contracts... saving you up to $500 a year. and it's only available to comcast business internet customers. so boost your bottom line by switching today. comcast business. powering possibilities. millions have made the switch from the big three to xfinity mobile. that means millions are saving hundreds a year on their wireless bill. and all of those millions are on the nation's most reliable 5g network and most recommended wireless carrier. that's a whole lot of happy campers out there.

and it's never too late to join them. get $450 off any new purchase of an eligible samsung device with xfinity mobile. or add a line to your plan today at xfinitymobile.com it's been a week frankly like no other we've seen in american politics. only monday fbi agents searched mar-a-lago and revelations since then are sending quite the shock waves throughout the entire nation. meanwhile president biden is signing two crucial bills into law. just hours ago the house passing the historic inflation reduction act. the real question is, how all of this is going to shake out in the midterms. it is frankly far from clear what will actually happen. joining me now to discuss cnn

senior political analyst ron brownstein and mark mckinnon. former adviser to george w. bush and john mccain also executive producer of "the circus." glad to see you both here tonight. let me start with you, mark. you have the fancy hat on. ron, you don't have one on so you can't go first. >> mark always has the hats. >> let me ask you. this warrant, a lot of republicans immediately defended trump. right after the search. before we knew any more information. long before ag garland ever came out. it's been i won't say crickets since the warrant was unsealed but it's been far more quiet relatively speaking. what do you think is kbgoing on right now in the gop in those discussions about maybe what to do next? >> i think the trump loyalists are just exhausted from trying to defend him when the ground shifts every news cycle. i mean, tomorrow donald trump will be saying it was hill hill and colonel mustard in the library with a knife unsealing

the documents. or that stored the documents. it's really problematic for trump long term. i'd still say it is a strong environment for republicans but the dynamic has shifted a lot in the last week with both these huge news stories. trump has managed to claw his way to the bottom. has snatched victory from the jaws of defeat when they were on a roll. but president biden also had his news at the same time. i think the one guy who is probably popping champagne right now is ron desantis. >> well, this did happen in florida. there is no connection we know of of course on this notion. i am often wondering who is sort of in the wings watching this and figuring out what to do next. ron, look. we know this mantra. the idea that all, you know, there's been a lot of bad news for trump but he has this mantra

that even bad publicity might be good for him to mark's point. given we are coming off a series of the january 6th hearings where you and i have discussed the potential for having a political toll and taking a toll on donald trump maybe from the exhaustion standpoint alone, does this sort of reinvigorate him and strengthen him politically? >> look, i think that within the republican party this comes at a moment where we have seen trump consolidate his control over the gop this summer and really break the remaining opposition. you know, when georgia happened and brian kem of and raffensperger won it was a lot of hopeful commentary among conservative pundits saying this is not the trump party anymore. the republican party has moved beyond trump. that has gone this summer. we are seeing the trump loyalists, election deniers win primaries for governor in arizona and michigan and wisconsin. secretary of state nominations.

we are seeing the house republicans who voted for impeachment, two of them defeated on a single night. on tuesday we'll see liz cheney almost certainly be defeated. you are seeing the republican party double down on its commitment to trump even as the legal challenges mount on every front. i think that is one of the things that has changed the dynamic. obviously the biggest thing that changed the dynamic in the midterm is the decision overturning row v. wade. democrats still have a lot of head winds. i think they are, the prospect of a republican congress trying to grease the way for a return of trump who was clearly the leader of this party, is now front and center in the midterm election. >> mark, to that point we know as ron has been talking about, how you react to or how you protest the 2020 election and whether you, you know, repeat and become an echo chamber for the election related lies was a

bit of a defining litmus test for the gop. will now the future be how you speak about this search? is that the latest and maybe the next? >> oh, yes. exactly right. great point. that will probably be the new litmus test. i agree with everything ron said. trump has consolidated the party once again. and this may only ratchet that up as well. but the point is, ron knows better than anybody, that midterm elections, the most important thing is enthusiasm among the parties. and i will just say that i don't see anything that happened this week that is going to increase republican enthusiasm and i see a lot that happened this week and before including roe that is going to animate democrats more than they were a few months ago. >> ron, do you think that is the case? even with the legislative win? will that be motivating enough? >> right. well, look. historically that is the reason why the president's party has lost seats in almost every midterm since the civil war

which is that the party out of power normally is much more enthusiastic. there is still that disparity evident in polls. but it is clearly different than it was a few months ago. mostly it has been a negative. it has been the fear of republicans taking away abortion rights after the roe decision. the fear of as i said a republican congress greasing the way for a trump return. now they have something more positive to run on and particularly for younger voters. the historic investments in climate that passed today with the potential to reduce climate emissions 40% over the decade is really the first thing they've had to go to young voters who were so critical in 2018 and 2020 and say your vote mattered. it changed policy. in the longer run all of the investments in domestic manufacturing in the semiconductor bill and infrastructure bill i think is going to give biden a chance to do what obama did in 2012 which is go to the midwest as he did with the auto bail out and say we are seating a new generation of manufacturing jobs but in the

near term it is the combination of abortion, climate, january 6th/trump scandals that are allowing democrats to close the enthusiasm gap and give them a fighting chance certainly at the senate and the key governorships and maybe even holding down, certainly holding down their losses and in a long shot holding the house. >> we have less than three months now to see what will happen. if this week is any indication of how things can quickly change, we've got a long maybe three months ahead of us. thank you both. >> thank you. salman rushdie is on a ventilator late tonight after being stabbed multiple times just before giving a lecture. we'll have an update on his condition after this.

my mental health was much better. my mind was in a good place. but my body was telling a different story. i felt all people saw were my uncontrolled movements. some mental health meds can cause tardive dyskinesia, or td, and it's unlikely to improve without treatment. ingrezza is a prescription medicine to treat adults with td movements in the face and body. it's the only treatment for td that's one pill, once-daily, with or without food. ingrezza 80 mg is proven to reduce td movements in 7 out of 10 people. people taking ingrezza

can stay on their current dose of most mental health meds. don't take ingrezza if you're allergic to any of its ingredients. ingrezza may cause serious side effects including sleepiness. don't drive, operate heavy machinery, or do other dangerous activities until you know how ingrezza affects you. other serious side effects include potential heart rhythm problems and abnormal movements. it's nice people focus more on me. ask your doctor about ingrezza, #1 prescribed for td. learn how you could pay as little as zero dollars at ingrezza.com. i would say that to me an important aspect is too... meta portal with smart sound. helps reduce your background noise.

bring that sense of calm, really... so you come through, loud and clear. meta portal. the smart video calling device that makes work from home work for you.

author salman rushdie is on

a ventilator tonight. rushdie was stabbed at least once in the neck and once in the abdomen while on stage in western new york state. just moments before he was set to give a lecture. the attack comes after years of death threats. >> reporter: famed author salman rushdie was scheduled to speak at a lecture series when witnesses say a man jumped on to the stage just as the event was getting under way and began punching and stabbing rushdie. one witness tells cnn she counted roughly seven to ten stabbing motions before fleeing for her own safety. rushdie suffered stab wounds to the neck and abdomen according to new york state police. and was air lifted to an area hospital. >> a state police officer who stood up and saved his life, protected him.

[ applause ] as well as the moderator who was attacked. >> reporter: the suspect was quickly take ebb into custody. new york state police identified him as a 24-year-old man. >> a lot of screaming and crying and everything. people rushing from the audience up on the stage. >> reporter: the 75-year-old author was born in mumbai and later moved to the uk. rushdie is accustomed to living under threat. his controversial fourth novel "the satanic verses" published in 1988 sparked public demonstrations all over the world. some muslims considered the book sacrilegeous. in 1989 the late iranian leader issued a fatwah a religious decree on rushdie calling for his death. rushdie lived under british protection for nearly ten years before the iranian government announced it would no longer enforce the fatwah. rushdie wrote a memoir about that era of his life called

joseph anton the name he used while in hiding. he has been out spoken over the years about living through that time. >> the best way that i can, what i can do to fight this is to show that, you know, in the way the child shows a bully in the playground i ain't scared of you. and the best thing i can do is to go on being the best writer i can be and to lead as open a professional and personal life as i can. that is just a way of saying that there may be this danger and it is a terrible and ugly thing and we need to fight it and defeat it but we don't have to hide under the bed. >> his agent releasing a statement late tonight listing his injuries saying the news is not good. that he will likely lose an eye. he suffered a stab wound to the liver so there is liver damage. there's nerve damage in his arm. obviously there are several other injuries that have yet to be really determined as he is still sedated and on the

ventilator and can't speak. certainly just a brutal attack. brazen in how it happened. now for investigators obviously the big question is was this part of some bigger plot, some other thing going on here to try and assassinate him? >> thank you. unbelievable. thank you for your reporting. will republican congresswoman liz cheney, one of the fiercest critics of trump's election lie, be able to keep her job? voters in wyoming decide just days from now. stay with us.

research shows that people remember ads with young people having a good time. so to help you remember that liberty mutual customizes your home insurance, here's a pool party. look what i brought! liberty mutual! they customize your home insurance... so you only pay for what you need! ♪young people having a good time with insurance.♪ ♪young people.♪ ♪good times.♪ ♪insurance!♪ only pay for what you need. ♪liberty liberty. liberty. liberty.♪ it's time for the biggest sale of the year, on the sleep number 360 smart bed. why choose proven quality sleep from sleep number? because proven quality sleep is vital to our health and wellness, only the sleep number 360 smart bed keeps you cool, then senses and effortlessly adjusts for your best sleep. and tells you exactly how well you slept. your sleepiq score. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. so, you can be your best for yourself and those you care about most. don't miss our weekend special. all smart beds are on sale. save 50% on the sleep number 360 limited edition smart bed. ends monday.

and it's easier than ever to■ get your projects done right. inside, outside, big or small, angi helps you find the right so for whatever you need done. with angi, you can connect with and see ratings and reviews. just search or scroll to see upf on hundreds of projects. and when you book and pay throug you're covered by our happiness it's easy to make your home an a check out angi.com today. angi... and done. the fbi search at mar-a-lago rallying former defenders at the former president's like places in wyoming where next week voters could deliver trufr a very key victory deciding whether or not the outspoken

trump critic liz cheney will get to stay in congress. cnn jeff zeleny has more. >> i know wyoming. i love wyoming. i am wyoming. >> reporter: herriot proudly wears wyoming on her sleeve. and wields it like a hammer against liz cheney. >> i am going to reclaim wyoming's washington seat from that virginiaen who currently holds it. >> reporter: these days signs of trouble for cheney are easy to spot in wyoming as she works to bring cheney's time in congress to an abrupt end. it wasn't always that way. >> i'm proud to introduce my friend liz cheney. >> reporter: back when she showered cheney with praise. >> a proven courageous constitutional conservative, someone who has the education, the background and the experience to fight effectively for wyoming on a national

station. >> reporter: it's a telling book end of the republican party's evolution under donald trump who elected the same day cheney first won and now he is at the center of her political fall in a state where he won 70% of the vote. his widest margin anywhere. >> she's fighting against president trump. she betrayed us. >> there is never an individual that is a greater threat to the republic than donald trump. >> reporter: yet here in wyoming hagueman is seen more than a hand picked candidate. she gained prominence as an attorney fighting the federal government to protect the water, land and natural resources. >> absolutely critical that we protect the energy industry not just for wyoming but for the united states. >> reporter: that focus on wyoming issues resonated with many voters we met like scott who voted early for hagueman. >> the work she's done, it's been stellar and we appreciate what she did. >> reporter: was it more for her or vote for liz cheney?

>> for her. >> reporter: the leadership on the january 6th committee turned off many republicans. >> a lot of choices she's made lately are not ones wyomingens are behind. >> reporter: and sauought to capitalize on the anger. >> we're fed up with the january 6th commission and the people that think they can gaslight us. >> when we caught up, she declined to answer our questions. how has liz cheney betrayed wyoming voters if i can ask you -- before an aide stepped in last week she embraced a baseless election denial rhetoric at a campaign stop in casper. >> absolutely the election was rigged. it was rigged to make sure that president trump could not get reel reelected. >> reporter: what she doesn't tell her audiences is she once opposed trump and supported ted kro cruz in 2016 a sign of her own transformation from cheney ally to trump loyalest with sights

set on washington. >> i'll take the fight to d.c. just as soon as i defeat liz cheney. >> talking to republicans all week long you get the sense she's in a very commanding lead going into the find weekend of campaigning here. cheney supporters know her only chance if she has one at all is to get democrats and independent voters to vote as republicans on tuesday, which they can do here in wyoming. the question is will that even be enough to overcome the big republican surge in the red state here of wyoming? laura? >> jeff, thank you so much. and thank you-all for watching. our coverage continues. [sfx: ding] [message] hey babe, meet us at the bottom of the trail. oh, man. hey! open up! the redesigned chevy silverado. with a sophisticated, high-tech interior... open the door!

it's easy to forget it's a truck. ♪ - thanks. - nice truck! it was. find new style. find new roads. carvana's had a lot of firsts. 100 percent online car buying, car vendinding machines, and now putting you in control of your financing. at carvana, get personalized terms, browse for cars that fit your budget, then customize your downpayment and monthly payment. and these aren't made up numbers, it's what you'll really pay, right down to the penny. wheather you're shopping or just looking, it only takes a few seconds and it won't affect your credit score. finally, a totally different way to finance your ride only from carvana.

it's started. somewhere between a cuddle and a struggle, it's...the side hug. tween milestones like this may start at age 9. hpv vaccination - a type of cancer prevention against certain hpv-related cancers, can start then too. for most, hpv clears on its own. but for others, it can cause certain cancers later in life. you're welcome! now, as the "dad cab", it's my cue to help protect them. embrace this phase. help protect them in the next. ask their doctor about hpv vaccination today.

there is not muc