♪dance! by christian a medice & elisha noll♪ ♪are you ready?♪ ♪ ♪let's go♪ ♪ ♪ahh yeah♪ ♪ ♪step to rhythm like♪ ♪you're going out tonight♪ ♪dance get with the groove and♪ ♪dance get up and move let's♪ ♪dance kick off your shoes and♪ ♪show me how you♪ ♪dance♪ ♪ ♪dance♪ ♪ ♪dance♪ get a free storage upgrade and case with s pen when you pre-order at at&t. ♪ (customer) save yourself?! money with farmers.

(burke) that's not wrong. when you bundle your home and auto policies with farmers, you save yourself up to twenty percent. (customer) that's something. (burke) get a whole lot of something with farmers. kinda creepy. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ our top story tonight, the mar-a-lago search warrant has been unsealed. investigators removing 11 sets of classified documents at trump's home, including one marked "top secret slrks sci", one of the nation's highest levels of classification. the warrant identifies three federal crimes the doj is looking into as part of the investigation including possible violations of the espionage act, obstruction of justice and criminal handling of government records. i want to bring in fareed zakaria host of cnn's fareed zakaria gps.

fareed, it's nice to see you right now. i would love it if you can try to help us put this into perspective here. you've got an fbi warrant with all these different sets of secret documents including the highest level of classified material not recovered in some secure location but in the president of the united states', former president's own home. there are potential violations of the espionage act which might be a bit of a misnomer in that that it is not synonymous with spying, of course. how do you put this into perspective? >> it is a very difficult challenge that the biden administration, although really the department of justice and the professionals in the department of justice are facing. because, clearly, there are potential violations of the law. some of these are minor. let's be clear. many officials, many government officials do mishandle classified documents.

and the department of justice takes it all very seriously as they should, but, you know, there is no allegation that these people have, you know, committed some intentionally done something to harm the national security of the united states. often they are just being careless in a way that they shouldn't be with highly sensitive material. but here is the challenge, which is even if all these things are true, you are dealing here with the political reality that you cannot avoid taking into account. this is donald trump. this is a man who millions upon millions, tens upon millions of people in the country adore, support, and think there is a conspiracy against him by a bunch of, you know, very smart, urban, liberal, lawyer types who are out to get him. right? so one of the things i am struck by is while the department of justice has every legal right to do what it's doing, perhaps even

a legal obligation, it is probably playing to donald trump's benefit. it is turning him into a victim. it is turning his -- mobilizing his supporters. there's probably huge amounts of fundraising going on honestly the right because of all of this. looking at the big, bad, deep state is out to get me again. i would hope merrick garland who is a very honorable man would take into account the political effects here, which is you can't win the battle and lose the war. you know? there is a -- if you discredit or the you politicize the justice department in the eyes of 60 million americans, you haven't duaned that much, even if you've got these classified documents. so that is the balance that i think and i'm sure they're thinking about, which is very difficult. because with anybody else you would just say, look. you broke the law or you seem to have broken the law. we have to get these documents back.

>> what strikes me when you say that is the idea of obviously it is a bit of a damned if you do damned if you don't philosophy in having to think about these things. but the idea of the battle versus the war, one could say something quite similar, fareed, to the idea of, you know, vilifying law enforcement and vilifying the agencies whose job it is to help support the enforcement of the law in the long run by doing that, if you are a supporter of trump, if you are trump himself, if you are those who are members of congress who believe that there should be a benefit that extended to him in perpetuity, there is still that challenge on that side. so i guess how does one reconcile? this is of course the $50 million question that i'm posing to you right now on this friday evening. how does one go about enforcing the law, showing no favor to one or political preference, et cetera, and then essentially overlook something because there

might be a political backlash? >> well, we are having a very deep, philosophical conversation on network television. you are absolutely right. because what trump has done is he has politicized everything. nothing is -- it's all about him. and so any time anything, anyone attacks him, he is happy to take the whole institution down. he is happy to accuse the fbi, the justice department, if some judge rules against him, he is going to vilify the judge. so you face this problem, which is that he has already done what you're describing. he has massively politicized all of this. there are people who say, you know, let justice be done and may the heavens fall. this was 16th century english jurist's line that people take. you know, i tend to think let's be real. we all want to be politically shrewd and exercise good judgment.

you know, one of the things that even in not in this current incarnation but the supreme court used to have that sort of political judgment, which is you don't just look at everything solely by the letter of the law. you operate within the political context in a country with millions of people. and so all i'm saying is, i think there has to be a balance. at the end of the day as i say garland is a very serious guy and a very ethical and honorable guy. but what i would like to do, what i would like him to do is make sure that the majority of the country continues to see him that way and continues to see the department that way. and if that means taking a few extra steps, for example, maybe coming on tv and explaining the dilemma and having exactly this conversation we're having and saying, look. i understand that this places us in an awkward position and i understand there are people -- who are devoted to him. but here are the things we were looking at. don't leave it to these very cold statements and, you know,

most people don't understand. as you were saying, explaining about the espionage act. most people don't get it. you know? the simple thing that donald trump says, the fbi raided my house. they broke into my safe. everybody is out to get me. so there's got to be some simple, compelling story on the other side. and somebody needs to maybe talk about it. don't just leave it to bland statements. >> well, i am one for a little bit of flavor in one's conversation. i will say that. but, also, having been part of the justice department there is a setup for quite the catch 22 because we've seen in recent times what happens when people run to a podium, hoping that transparency will be well received. we've seen the fallout there as well. fareed, i am so excited to talk to you tonight and very interested in seeing your special episode coming up of "fareed zakaria gps, the fall of kabul one year later" on this coming sunday at 10:00 a.m. and

1:00 p.m. please don't miss it. fareed, thank you so much. >> thank you so much. i want to bring in now cnn's sara murray, national security analyst, steve hall, and former deputy assistant attorney general harry litman. look, i've had a deep conversation with fareed. you all are next. i'd love to have this conversation with you all as well. sara, i begin with you because look, you've been going through this search warrant meticulously. i'm wondering what more are you learning about what the fbi took from mar-a-lago and perhaps more importantly why? >> i think what is striking is this is all coming after more than a year of wrangling and even after that, even after all these discussions about the documents and a subpoena to get the documents what they walked away with, with this search warrant, were 11 sets of classified information, so that includes one top secret/sci doc. those are among the highest levels of classifications, four

sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret document, and three sets of confidential documents, and of course something about the french president, we don't know what that is, and some kind of document related to the pardon of roger stone, donald trump's long-time political strategist. so quite an array there. obviously not a ton of detail on what the documents actually are. >> on that last part, the second to last part, the penultimate, flex my shakespearean vocabulary for a second, harry. i'm asking you this. we think about the search warrant and the idea of what they identified. it's not like roger stone getting some form of a clemency or a pardon was not known. i mean, he was pardoned before trump left office and he avoided that three-year prison sentence and prison term. so do you have, when you heard that as one of the possible documents, help us understand. is there a bridge that you could foresee of why that would be connected under a warrant like this? >> the short answer is no. they might have taken many things that were just described by the warrant though when i

heard about the prime minister of france i thought, hum. is trump looking to blackmail? i really want to address a couple things that fareed said. you know, one that i agree with and have agreed with is it won't be enough just to show the facts and the law. there will be at the end of the day a best interests of the day analysis. second, however, the notion that, well, there are different violations under this statute and some are relatively benign, no, no, no. we are talking about materials. imagine that these aren't pieces of paper, but these are pieces of plutonium. and even if you carelessly smuggled them out, the u.s. comes and says we need that plutonium back, and you say what plutonium? we need that plutonium back. you try to destroy it. this is inherently, by actual definition, dangerous to the united states' interests and very serious. finally, the point about publication. i take his point but it is nuanced because there the doj is damned if you do and damned if

you don't. things they are protecting on the other side, integrity of the investigation, identity of the confidential informant, they uniquely can't willy nilly ignore which is why by the way the warrant was released with the redacted names of the fbi then trump released it with their names and now they are under assault and need special protection. >> you forgot one important part of course here, harry, that part of the reason you don't have these things public and don't have the doj and fbi fronting the information about the search is because of the constitutional protections for the person who is being searched. that there is a presumption of innocence. there are the guard rails that ought to be there because as you know with the jury let alone court of public opinion, courtroom of law, the idea of the fbi, if there wasn't something, you know there is that benefit extended but on the one point you raise the idea of the president of france, some sort of blackmail. we don't have that information. you're thinking about it more broadly of what might be possibilities.

we don't have that reporting or the information. but steve, i want to go here to you. he was actually on news and read a new statement from trump's office. check this out. >> this is from president trump's office. it just came in a few minutes ago. as we can all relate to everyone, as we can all relate to, everyone ends up having to bring home their work from time to time. american presidents are no different. president trump in order to prepare the work the next day often took documents including classified documents to the residence. he had a standing order. there is the word i've been looking for. that documents removed from the oval office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them. the power to classify and declassify documents rests solely with the president of the united states. the idea that some paper pushing bureaucrat with classification authority delegated by the

president needs to approve the declassification is absurd. >> well, steve, what is the absurd part to you in that statement? >> where to begin? you know, i will certainly leave the issue as to whether the former president or any president can waive the proverbial -- wave the proverbial magic wand and make something classified no longer i'll leave that to folks who understand better about that. but the most absurd thing really about this, and this gets a little bit to the question, okay, what about the french and all of that, is the damage that this continues to do to our foreign intelligence relationships. so it was bad enough when trump was president and was doing things like inviting the russian foreign minister to the oval office to talk about sensitive israeli intelligence which the israelis turned out to be quite upset about later on. it wasn't even our intelligence hi was compromising. that was apparently israeli intelligence.

so the hope and i think the thuz thought was, okay, well, this particular president -- and by the way, it doesn't matter whether this was a democratic president or republican president, the party doesn't matter. doing these types of things is the problem. i think our foreign partners thought okay. when president trump leaves office at least we won't perhaps have to worry about it that much. but the problem is this all now coming up again and i think it reminds these very important foreign intelligence relationships about some of the weaknesses in the american system or highlights them. overall our system is extremely good at protecting classified information but when the most senior person in the government the one who does and can de classify things shows he is not responsible as the president has done several times this is just a reminder it is going to cause our foreign allies to back off again a little bit i'm afraid. even though that president is no longer in power. >> sara, i want to come back to

you on this point as well, but harry, i have to say look, yes, as working people, we've all brought work home from time to time. i don't know about you. but i don't bring home top secret or sci classified things. the idea of those scrutinized notions don't make sense to me. but, also, the word that's missing here in this conversation, harry, is it is one thing if the current president brought work home with him to the oval office or the white house residence. this is a former president who has retained documents for whatever reason no longer living or residing at the white house. shouldn't that have occurred to the lawyers before making that statement? this is a former president we're talking about? >> it must have occurred in fact and people who helped and there had to be are possibly in the soup as well. again, we're talking about someone who -- there are people

out there to back up what steve said, wicked people in the world who would love, might know about this, want to come steal it. he's got plutonium there and it is dangerous and he knows it because he is told again and again. anyone who has ever been can be divided between anyone ever in government and anyone who hasn't. anyone whoever has been notes this classification is completely radioactive. you cannot even look at documents except in a secret room. they know how serious it is. >> you know, you must have plutonium on the brain. must have been a high school periodic tables chart of some kind. i know there was. i remember tungsten was w. that's all i got. sorry, high school. sara, back to you. i'm not going ask you about the periodic tables here, but i do want to know what else you're hearing from team trump tonight. >> you know, it is sort of interesting to see the statement come out from them tonight and use this as their explanation because they had a different explanation when a former trump

national security official was on television earlier today. listen to what cash patel did. >> the gsa has since come out the government service administration say they mistakenly packed some boxes and moved them to mar-a-lago. that is not on the president but the national archives to sort that material out. >> a lot of different explanations from trump allies about what may have happened here and the gsa did respond by the way and said the responsibility for making decisions about what materials are moved rests entirely with the outgoing president i.e. this is not our fault. but i do think it gets to the idea there are two issues here. one, what is the classification of these documents? two, even if you may have declassified these documents or believed that you declassified these documents as president, that doesn't mean that you still get to take home reams and reams of documents with you when you leave the white house and not abide by any of the presidential records. >> steve, what do you make of

the idea this is somebody else's doing, it was, just happened to be there? i just think that myself, that the process by which you have gotten the documents to mar-a-lago would have involved a number of hands, a number of movers, etcetera. so there was access points all along that particular point in time. let alone blaming it on the gsa or otherwise, the national archives. we also know that the top justice department counter intelligence official has been involved in this case. and, also, visited mar-a-lago in june. i am wondering what collectively does that person's role and their presence as a part of the investigation tell you about this very investigation? >> well, i'm not going to go plutonium but i'll go with another equally strange concept which is counterintelligence. i'm glad you mentioned it. let's not forget not only is this not the walking distance between the oval office and the residence in the white house. this is mar-a-lago a very popular destination. lots of people around. lots of people to include two

chinese nationals who not too long ago tried, during trump's presidency, tried to get in and trespass and get past the security to get into that location. i don't think that is a coincidence. i think that foreign governments that are interested in targeting the united states and trying to spy on us know this kind of thing happens at mar-a-lago whether conversations that are extremely sensitive held in nonsensitive places or that type of documents or those types of documents, top-secret stored in the basement. that is certainly not lost on people. i do think if we step away from the weeds a second there is one important question. and it's why? where is the narrative of innocence here? i mean, sure there's lots of people in the trump camp saying, well. it was gsa perhaps or it wasn't his fault or stuff just showed up. who knows how? where is a real serious explanation, innocent explanation that makes all of us, you know, in this country whether republican or democrat say, oh, okay.

that makes perfect sense. now i understand why he would have taken that stuff to mar-a-lago. failing that i just don't understand it. and given trump's mishandling of classified previously, and thinking of rules that apply to him it is difficult for me to see an innocent narrative here. >> well, that's an important point. you wonder where the moment is during the course of the conversations. we believe you have information. oh, well come down and get everything. take it all. what are you talking about? i don't have anything here that is a problem. that would be in many ways the normal response to say if you think i have it come and look. take everything you want. i don't need it. it's not for me. we haven't seen that yet. because we talked about it a number of times, harry, plutonium is number 94. okay? there you go. >> thank you. >> there will now be a jeopardy category on that very thing everyone. plutonium is not a laughing matter for the sake of the conversation everyone. thank you so much. >> thanks. look. there has been as you know, just

yesterday, an attack on an fbi office. there's been violent calls for assassinations. now federal law enforcement is investigating an unprecedented number of threats. there is a new warning tonight.

your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire hybrid work is here. it's there. it's everywhere. but for someone to be able to work from here, there has to be someone here making sure everything is safe. secure. consistent. so log in from here. or here. assured that someone is here ready to fix anything. anytime. anywhere. even here. that's because nobody... and i mean nobody... makes hybrid work, work better.

tonight sources are saying the fbi's warning its 38,000

employees nationwide. 38,000 employees nationwide to remain vigilant. why? because there is a heightened threat environment following the search of mar-a-lago. the bureau's investigating an unprecedented number of threats made against personnel and property in the wake of the search. i want to bring in cnn national security analyst juliette kayyem, a former official in the department of homeland. juliette, it's good to see you this evening, but my goodness. first of all, this threat level directed at members of the fbi. donie o'sullivan is reporting that trump's social media platform sent a push alert this afternoon to an article with an unredacted version of the search warrant. why is that important? because it included the names of two fbi agents and now they are being villainized on pro trump social media and there might be extraordinary danger now. just how extraordinary and how dangerous could this be? >> very.

we just need to call it that. this is not a joke. and so much of trump's circle and inner circle and the family itself view life as sort of this expendable thing for purposes of their political gain. they just throw this stuff out there. they know exactly what they're doing. i think it is incumbent on everyone to call them on it. you simply can no longer talk about both sides or talk about mere violence. this is a form of targeted assassination against two named fbi agents who were doing their jobs, who cares what their politics are, in issuing a search warrant against the president, former president of the united states, approved by a judge. is the judge also under attack? he is the board member of a synagogue. that synagogue had to close their services this weekend because of the threat.

the trump family and i mean the family because the sons are on air doing this stuff. the trumps know exactly what they're doing. they are inciting the kill. and i am not afraid to say that. it is exactly what their intention is and that is why they allow these platforms to repeat this information. >> i mean, just the idea, so >> i mean, just so year clear on this, juliette, the fact that the director of the fbi has said his potentially number one priority now is the safety of law enforcement agents. i mean, you and i both know that means in some respects the more that the law enforcement and the fbi are dealing with the number of threats against them, they cannot be dealing with a number of threats against other matters. if you care about human trafficking, if you care about drugs and communities, you care about arms dealers and guns and all things are happening and crime at a larger scale, do we really want the fbi to be concerned about what might happen to them or doing what we

hope they will do? >> right. exactly right. and their family. >> and their families. >> right. i mean, if you look at the cess pool it is not just them. it is a wife or a spouse or children. it is a personal address, and phone numbers. if i sound like someone who has been the target of these kinds of attacks? yeah. not like these guys but they find your cell phone. they print this stuff. you're always conscious of the safety and security issues. but in this environment in which trump sort of -- trump's sort of violent core and i'm very clear these are not all trump supporters and certainly not all trump voters but that violent core saw monday night as the beginning of what they self-describe as a civil war. now, a rational human being if we had one in the former president would say, i shouldn't

do anything to give them fuel to find the people who issued the warrant or approved the warrant or came to mar-a-lago. instead he does the opposite. and i just think it is just, i mean, it's no longer incitement. this is just directed violence at this stage. it is something we've never seen before obviously from a former president. but certainly from a party that because they're not addressing it or condemning it, every well meaning honestly or even trump supporter gop member, people on our network who try to wiggle out of what's going on, i think it is really important that that failure to condemn the violence is actually what breeds it because it's not being chained. it is being nurtured, supported on these online efforts. there is just like you can't even, you know, at this stage it is very difficult to separate the sort of make america great movement with the violence now.

and that's what we're going to have to do by protecting ourselves and by protecting law enforcement agents and focusing on the important things that matter, which is sort of the rule of law again in this country. >> it is unbelievable we're talking about it to level. again, this harkens back. we were having this conversation several weeks ago when the dhs put out the bulletin talking about the greatest threats essentially they were focusing on were those from within the borders of this country. >> right. >> and the idea and reaction to political grievance and some sort of license people think they have that if you're angry about something politically that violence is a viable vehicle to do things. that's sort of the antithesis of what needed to happen for republic to be kept. >> right. >> juliette, we're going to have to talk again. it is unfortunate we are here now. >> unfortunately. >> thinking about those families and all the law enforcement impacted. needless to say, everyone, it's been a dramatic week.

very dramatic week. i mean, it began with the search of trump's mar-a-lago residence. then you had the series of wins for president biden. you wonder how it is all going to play out with the midterms right around the corner. we'll talk about it next.

it's time for the biggest sale of the year, on the sleep number 360 smart bed. it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to keep you both comfortable. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. all smart beds are on sale. save 50% on the sleep number 360 limited edition smart bed. ends monday

i mean, it's been a week, frankly, like no other we've ever seen in american politics. only monday fbi agents searched mar-a-lago and revelations since then are sending quite the shock waves throughout the entire nation. meanwhile president biden is signing two crucial bills into law. and just hours ago, the house passing the historic inflation reduction act. the real question is how all of this is going to shake out in the midterms. frankly, it's far from clear how all of this will happen. joining me now to discuss cnn senior political analyst ron brownstein and mark mckinnon. former adviser to george w. bush and john mccain also executive producer of "the circus." i'm glad to see both of you here tonight. let me start with you, mark. you have the fancy hat on. ron, you don't have one on so you can't go first. mark, let me ask you about this very thing. this warrant, a lot of republicans immediately defended trump.

i mean, right after the search, before we knew any information, long before ag garland ever came out. it's been i won't say crickets since the warrant was unsealed but it's been far more quiet relatively speaking. what do you think is going on right now in the gop in those discussions about maybe what to do next? >> i think the trump loyalists are just exhausted from trying to defend him when the ground shifts every news cycle. i mean, tomorrow donald trump willie saying it was hillary hillary and colonel mustard in the library with a knife unsealing the documents or that stored the documents. it's really problematic for trump long term. i'd still say it is a strong environment for republicans but the dynamic has shifted a lot in the last week with both these huge news stories. trump has managed to claw his way to the bottom. has snatched victory from the jaws of defeat when they were on

a roll. but president biden also had his news at the same time. i think the one guy who is probably popping champagne right now is ron desantis. >> well, this did happen in florida. there is no connection we know of of course on this notion. i am often wondering who is sort of in the wings watching this and figuring out what to do next. ron, look. we know this mantra. the idea that all, you know, there's been a lot of bad news for trump but he has this mantra that even bad publicity might be good for him to mark's point. given we are coming off a series of the january 6th hearings where you and i have discussed the potential for having a political toll and taking a toll on donald trump maybe from the exhaustion standpoint alone, does this sort of reinvigorate him and strengthen him politically? >> look, i think that within the republican party this comes at a

moment where we have seen trump consolidate his control over the gop this summer and really break the remaining opposition. you know, when georgia happened and brian kemp and raffensperger won, it was a lot of hopeful commentary among conservative pundits saying this is not the trump party anymore. the republican party has moved beyond trump. that has gone this summer. we are seeing the trump loyalists, election deniers win primaries for governor in arizona and michigan and wisconsin. secretary of state nominations. we are seeing the house republicans who voted for impeachment, two of them defeated on a single night. on tuesday we'll see liz cheney almost certainly be defeated. you are seeing the republican party double down on its commitment to trump even as the legal challenges mount on every front. i think that is one of the things that has changed the dynamic. obviously the biggest thing that changed the dynamic in the midterm is the decision

overturning row v. wade. roe v. wade. democrats still have a lot of head winds. i think they are, the prospect of a republican congress trying to grease the way for a return of trump who was clearly the leader of this party, is now front and center in the midterm election. >> mark, to that point we know as ron has been talking about, how you react to or how you protest the 2020 election and whether you, you know, repeat and become an echo chamber for the election related lies was a bit of a defining litmus test for the gop. will now the future be how you speak about this search? is that the latest and maybe the next? >> oh, yes. exactly right. great point. that will probably be the new litmus test. listen, i agree with everything that ron said, that trump has consolidated the party once again. and this may only ratchet that up as well. but the point is, ron knows better than anybody, that

midterm elections, the most important thing is enthusiasm among the parties. and i will just say that i don't see anything that happened this week that is going to increase republican enthusiasm and i see a lot that happened this week and before including roe that is going to animate democrats more than they were a few months ago. >> ron, do you think that is the case? even with the legislative win? will that be motivating enough? >> right. well, look. historically that is the reason why the president's party has lost seats in almost every midterm since the civil war which is that the party out of power normally is much more enthusiastic. there is still that disparity evident in polls. but it is clearly different than it was a few months ago. mostly it has been a negative. it has been the fear of republicans taking away abortion rights after the roe decision. the fear of, as i said, a republican congress greasing the way for a trump return. now they have something more

positive to run on, laura, and particularly for younger voters. the historic investments in climate that passed today with the potential to reduce climate emissions 40% over the decade is really the first thing they've had to go to young voters who were so critical in 2018 and 2020 and say your vote mattered. it changed policy. in the longer run all of the investments in domestic manufacturing in the semiconductor bill and infrastructure bill i think is going to give biden a chance to do what obama did in 2012 which is go to the midwest as he did with the auto bailout and say we are seeding a new generation of manufacturing jobs but in the near term it is the combination of abortion, climate, january 6th/trump scandals that are allowing democrats to close the enthusiasm gap and give them a fighting chance certainly at the senate and the key governorships and maybe even holding down, certainly holding down their losses and in a long shot holding the house. >> well, look, we've got less than three months now to see what will happen. if this week is any indication of how things can quickly change, we've got a long maybe three months ahead of us.

thank you both. >> thank you. salman rushdie is on a ventilator late tonight after being stabbed multiple times just before giving a lecture. we'll have an update on his condition after this. welcome to allstate where anyone who bundles their home

and auto insurance saves. isn't that right phil? sorry, i'm a little busy. what in the world are you doing? i'm in the metaverse, bundling my home and auto insurance. why don't you just do that in the real world? um, because now i can bundle in space. watch this. save up to 25% when you bundle home and auto. call a local agent or 1-888-allstate for a quote today.

author salman rushdie is on

a ventilator tonight. that's what his agent is telling the "new york times." rushdie was stabbed at least once in the neck and once in the abdomen while on stage in western new york state. just moments before he was set to give a lecture. as cnn's shimon prokupecz reports, the attack comings after years of death threats. >> reporter: famed author salman rushdie was scheduled to speak at a lecture series when at the chautauqua institution when witnesses say a man jumped on to the stage just as the event was getting under way and began punching and stabbing rushdie. one witness tells cnn she counted roughly seven to ten stabbing motions before fleeing for her own safety. rushdie suffered stab wounds to the neck and abdomen according to new york state police. and was air lifted to an area hospital. >> a state police officer who stood up and saved his life, protected him. [ applause ]

as well as the moderator who was attacked as well. >> reporter: the suspect was quickly taken into custody. new york state police identified him as 24-year-old hadi matar. >> there was a lot of screaming and crying and everything. people rushing from the audience up on the stage. >> reporter: the 75-year-old author was born in mumbai and later moved to the uk. rushdie is accustomed to living under threat. his controversial fourth novel "the satanic verses" published in 1988 sparked public demonstrations all over the world. some muslims considered the book sacrilegious. in 1989 the late iranian leader ayatollah row ruhollah khomeini issued a decree on rushdie, calling for his death. rushdie lived under british protection for nearly ten years before the iranian government

announced it would no longer enforce the fatwah. rushdie wrote a memoir about that era of his life called "joseph anton," the name he used while in hiding. he has been out spoken over the years about living through that time. >> the best way that i can, what i can do to fight this is to show that, you know, in the way the child shows a bully in the playground i ain't scared of you. and the best thing i can do is to go on being the best writer i can be and to lead as open a professional and personal life as i can. that is just a way of saying that there may be this danger and it's a terrible thing, and it's an ugly thing, and we need to fight it and we need to defeat it, but we don't have to hide under the bed. >> and laura, his agent, rushdie's agent releasing a statement tonight listing his injuries, saying the news is not good. that he will likely lose an eye. he suffered a stab wound to the liver so there is liver damage. there's nerve damage in his arm. obviously there are several other injuries that have yet to be really determined as he is

still sedated and on the ventilator and can't speak. certainly just a brutal attack. brazen in how it happened. now for investigators obviously the big question is was this part of some bigger plot, some other thing going on here to try and assassinate him. >> shimon, thank you. unbelievable. thank you for your reporting. will republican congresswoman liz cheney, one of the fiercest critics of trump's election lie, be able to keep her job? voters in wyoming decide just days from now. stay with us. at bath fitter, evy bath starts with quality people. our consultants help you choose from hundreds of bath options so we fit your style. our installers complete your work in as little as a day so we fit your schedule. our manufacturing team custom crafts your bath so we fit your standards, and it's guaranteed for life. when you can trust the people who create your new bath, it just fits. bath fitter.

visit bathfitter.com to book your free consultation.

new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. when you sponsor a job, you immediately get your shortlist of quality candidates, whose resumes on indeed match your job criteria. visit indeed.com/hire and get started today. why hide your skin if dupixent has your moderate-to-severe eczema, or atopic dermatitis under control? hide my skin? not me. because dupixent targets a root cause of eczema, it helps heal your skin from within, keeping you one step ahead of it. hide my skin? not me. and for kids ages 6 months and up that means clearer skin, and noticeably less itch. with dupixent, you can change how their skin looks and feels. and that's the kind of change you notice. hide my skin? not me. serious allergic reactions can occur that can be severe. tell your doctor about new or worsening eye problems such as eye pain or vision changes,

including blurred vision, joint aches and pain, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma medicines without talking to your doctor. when you help heal your skin from within, you can show more with less eczema. talk to your child's eczema specialist about dupixent, a breakthrough eczema treatment. the fbi searching mar-a-lago rallying republicans to the former president's side and putting a renewed focus over the influence over the party this primary season like places like

wyoming where next week voters could deliver trump a very key victory, deciding whether or not the outspoken trump critic liz cheney will get to stay in congress. cnn's jeff zeleny has more. >> i know wyoming. i love wyoming. i am wyoming. >> reporter: proudly wears wyoming on her sleeve and wields it like a hammer against liz cheney. >> i am going to re-claim wyoming's congressional seat from the virginian who currently holds it. >> reporter: these days signs of trouble for cheney are easy to spot here in wyoming as she works to bring cheney's time in congress to an abrupt end. it wasn't always that way. >> i am proud to introduce my friend liz cheney. >> reporter: back when she showered cheney with praise in her bid for congress back in 2016. >> courageous, conservative, someone who has the education, the background and the experience to fight effectively

for wyoming on a national stage. >> reporter: it's a telling book end of the republican party's evolution under donald trump who was elected the same day cheney first won, and now he's at the center of her political fall. >> she's fighting against president trump. she betrayed us. >> there's never been an individual who was a greater threat to our republic than donald trump. >> reporter: yet here in wyoming before her fight with cheney she gained prominence as an attorney, fighting the federal government to protect the state's water, land, and natural resources. >> it's absolutely critical we protect the energy industry not just for wyoming but the united states. >> reporter: that focus resonated with many we met like scott who voted early for hage rgman. >> was it more for her or more

against liz cheney? >> no, it was for her. >> reporter: cheney's fixation with trump and her leadership on the january 6th committee has also turned off a ought of republicans. >> a lot of choices she's made lately are not ones wyoming is behind. >> reporter: and hagerman has sought to capitalize on that anger with trump loyalists. >> reporter: when we caught up with her after a speech to the rock springs chamber of commerce she declined to answer our questions. before an aide stepped in. just last week she embraced the former president's baseless election denial rhetoric at a campaign stop in casper. >> absolutely the election was rigged. it was rigged to make sure that president trump could not get re-elected. >> reporter: what hageman doesn't tell her audiences she once opposed trump. it's a sign of her own

transformation with her sights set on washington. >> i'll be taking that fight to d.c. just as soon as i defeat liz cheney. >> reporter: talking to republicans here all week long you get the sense hageman is a in a very commanding league going into the final weekend of campaigning here. cheney supporters know her only chance, if she has one at all, is to get democrats and independent voters to vote as republicans on tuesday, which they can do here in wyoming. the question is will that even be enough to overturn the big republican surge in the red state here of wyoming? laura? >> jeff, thank you so much. and thank you all for watching. our coverage continues.

new astepro allergy. no allergy spray is faster. with the speed of astepro, almost nothing can slow you down. because astepro starts working in 30 minutes, while other allergy sprays take hours. and astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free allergy spray. now without a prescription. astepro and go.

hello and welcome coming to you live. i'm michael holmes, appreciate your company. coming up here on "cnn newsroom," new details about the top secret material seized by the fbi at donald trump's mar-a-lago home and what the former u.s. president is being investigated for. and brazen attack on celebrated author, what we know about his condition. and as schools reopen here in the u.s., many covid-19 restrictions are easing up. is that a good idea?