that's why he had the cannabis with him. but the russian court still rejected his appeal, leaving his 14-year prison sentence intact. kate. >> kylie, thank you so much for that. thank you all so much for joining us. i'm kate bolduan. "a.c. 360" starts now. good friday evening to you. jim sciutto here sitting in for anderson. tonight making sense of the unprecedented look we've just gotten into what until now was almost unimaginable, the criminal investigation of a former president. it follows the equally unprecedented court-approved search of a former president's home. today under orders from the same federal judge who approved that search warrant, the justice department released the affidavit backing the warrant. the document laying out the government's case that a search could yield evidence of a crime or even multiple crimes.

it is heavily redacted to protect sources, potential witnesses, as well as the ongoing investigation of not just the president but also, quoting the document now, all potential criminal confederates. that said, there is much it does reveal, starting with what investigators believe they would find beyond the 15 boxes that were returned to the government in january. quoting again, there is probable cause to believe that additional documents that contain classified ndi or that are presidential records subject to record retention requirements currently remain at the premises. we should note ndi stands for national defense information. the affidavit goes on to provide a preliminary assessment of what was in the january material. quoting again, 184 unique documents bearing classification markings, including 67 documents marked as confidential, 92 documents marked as secret, 25

documents marked as top secret. 25 top secret documents. just to put that in perspective, i want to read you a passage from the u.s. code which anyone receiving such documents should be familiar with. quote, the test for assigning top secret classification is whether it's authorized, unauthorized disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security. exceptionally grave damage. the affidavit, though, does go on to specify far worse. apologies in advance for the jarr jargon. quoting now, fbi agents observed markings reflecting the following compartments dissemination controls. hcs, fisa, orcon, noforn and si. based on my training and experience, i know that documents classified at these levels typically contain ndi. that's quoting again from the

document. again, ndi is national defense information which is alarming enough. fisa is court-ordered surveillance collecting foreign intelligence. orcon means so sensitive the agency which collected that intelligence must approve any request to share it, even within this country. noforn is intelligence too sensitive to share with any foreign entities, including close allies. and si or special intelligence is from signals intercept such as the nsa. the affidavit then defines something far graver in the list of intelligence terms and that is hcs, human control system is an sci control system designed to protect intelligence information derived that clandestine, secret, human sources overseas commonly referred to as human intelligence. in other words, information which if disclosed could get

secret foreign intelligence agents captured or even killed. just to underscore, this is not what agents recently took from mar-a-lago, it is from the 15 boxes recovered back in january. the doj is concerned that more classified information remained behind before that search a couple of weeks ago. in addition, the affidavit refers to the other potential crimes cited in the search warrant, quoting again. there is also probable cause to believe that evidence of obstruction will be found at the premises. evidence of obstruction. much of the rest of the information is redacted, signaling how sensitive this information could be. remember, the justice department did not want to release any of this at all and ordinarily such things are never made public during an ongoing investigation, especially of an elected official, candidate or potential candidate. in part, that is to protect the individuals themselves. however, this particular individual, the former

president, wanted it out there, all of it, unredacted. today he complained about those redactions, which is only the latest in a series of complaints, excuses, shifting explanations from him, and some of his allies. >> my father has worked so collaboratively with them for months. in fact the lawyer that's been working on this was totally shocked. >> the way our federal government has gone, it's what we thought about the gestapo and people like that. >> do i know that the boxes of material they took from mar-a-lago, that they won't put things in those boxes to entrap him? how do we know that they're going to be honest with us about what's actually in the boxes? >> he had a standing order, there's the word i've been looking for, that documents removed from the oval office and taken to the residence were deemed to be declassified the moment he removed them. >> donald trump tweeted that president barack hussein obama, this is his tweet, kept 33 million pages of documents, much of them classified. >> if you look at the espionage act, it's not really about taking the documents, it's about

destroying them. or hiding them. or giving them to the enmoo e. >> right. >> it's not about taking them and putting them in a place that's roughly as safe as they were in in the first place. >> as we can all relate to, everyone ends up having to bring home their work from time to time. >> to go into a former president's home, there better be a dead body in there or a smoking gun or something. >> that was the former president's acting chief of staff a few days ago, seemingly preparing to move the goal posts. today in a tweet he seemed to, quoting him now, it appears this raid was in fact just about documents as even some of the left have opined that is simply outrageous. also weighing in, saying more than he ever has on the subject, president biden mocking one of those excuses you just heard. >> i just want to know, i've declassified everything in the world. i'm president, i can do it. come on, declassify the world. i'm not going to comment. i don't know the detail. i don't even want to know.

i'll let the justice department take care of it. >> let's get to the facts on all three fronts, legal, political and national security. cnn's jessica schneider starts us off. jessica, let's look at this affidavit. what more does it say about exactly how those classified documents right up to top secret were handled from the time the former president left office until the time of that search at mar-a-lago? >> well, jim, there was great concern here because they said the documents were handled very haphazardly with seemingly little regard for the very highly sensitive nature of the contents there. we've seen this affidavit. you know, when the archives referred this matter to the doj back in february, they referenced how they had done this preliminary review of those 15 boxes that they took before the fbi took the boxes over. and how those boxes contained not only this classified material but also things like news articles, photos, notes, printouts. the archives said that they were significantly concerned because of how those classified records, as they put it, intermixed with

other records and really just improperly stored and identified. so that was really when alarm bells first went off for the archives, telling the doj, and then we know the fbi took over the investigation in may, jim. >> it seems no special care taken for the sensitivity of that information. did the affidavit shed light on who exactly investigators had been talking to, of course without revealing their identity, which it is very sensitive not to. >> no specific identities, that's all redacted. but in this legal memo that accompanied the affidavit that was also released today, doj is describing how they have been talking to, as they put it, a significant number of witnesses. and the major reason that prosecutors gave to keep really what was more than half of this affidavit redacted was in fact to protect those witnesses. the doj put it really bluntly in their memo. they said a lot of the information in this affidavit, it could not only be used to identify these numerous

witnesses, but if the witnesses were exposed, doj said this, they could face retaliation, intimidation, harassment, even threats to their physical safety. so in part because of those concerns, that's why the judge allowed a significant portion of this affidavit to be kept out of public view for the safety of the witnesses. >> and we've seen very public attacks on witnesses who appeared in other investigations. one unredacted portion of the affidavit cited a communication from a trump attorney, evan corcoran. tell us what we know about that. >> yeah, so this is a three-page letter sent from evan corcoran may 25th. no redactions. and it's where evan corcoran pushed back against doj's investigation. in fact he wrote out a list of several bullet points as to why he said trump could not be implicated in the criminal probe. so among them are the claims that trump had in his words absolute authority to declassify documents. you know, jim, of course our reporting team just a few days ago debunked that claim by

talking to more than a dozen former trump officials who said that the idea that trump declassified all these documents in a standing order was just ridiculous. but on top of that, corcoran's letter also tried to claim that a former president is totally immune from criminal liability because of separation of powers issues. also a faulty legal argument here. and overall, jim, corcoran's letter tries to claim and warn that the doj is being just purely political about this investigation. of course that's a refrain we've heard repeatedly over the past several weeks from trump and his allies. >> no question. and normally a process of declassification involves consultation with intelligence agencies, relabeling and so on, none of which appears to have happened here. perspective now from carrie cordero, former counsel at doj to the assistant attorney general for national security and also james clapper. elie honig, former federal

prosecutor. if i could begin with you, director clapper, as you know in this redacted affidavit we learned these classified materials recovered included material beyond really the level of top secret, very highly classified categories within that level of classification, including clandestine human sources, overseas intelligence gathering. given your decades in intelligence as well as serving as dni, tell us what potential damage could be caused by keeping these in an unsecure environment. >> well, first caveat statement i want to make when we're discussing this is we still do not know the content of any of these documents. what we do know, though, are the ascriptions that characterize them from a classification standpoint. you gave a very good explanation at the top, jim, about what

these caveats mean. a point i would add is they are not mutually exclusive. so i would suspect that some of these documents at least, which is typical, particularly with hcs, human intelligence control system, could also be orcon and noforn which emphasizes the sensitivity and potential profound damage that could accrue if these are not protected, which they weren't, and if they are exposed. of course in the case of human control system, that is designed to protect assets that we have recruited overseas who are risking their very lives to provide u.s. government information. not only does that have a current impact, the content of what they're reporting, but it has a future impact in that it would serve to chill other potential assets from being recruited.

>> it's a good point. the overlap as you mentioned there, you can imagine circumstances where a clandestine foreign source is so sensitive that it would also be restricted from sharing with foreign allies and also require the approval of the agency, say the cia who collected it. these details matter. carrie, from a legal standpoint as we mentioned, the affidavit said that a search would likely find, quote, evidence of obstruction. obviously as with intelligence, there's a lot we don't know from the redactions. but what stood out to you about that? what potential evidence of obstruction? >> well, part of the information that presumably was in the affidavit but is still redacted has to do with the back and forth that went between the justice department or archives officials and the former president or his advisers and lawyers. and so there has been an extensive back and forth over the course of a year and a half where the government was trying

to recover materials that it believed were inappropriately stored at the former president's residence. and so that information over time, i think what it seems to me happened, is that they engaged -- the government engaged with the former president's team, tried to have materials returned. at some point they started to believe that that information was not being forth coming, that they were not being told the truth, that there was more information that was still stored there. so i think part of what was in the obstruction part potentially part of the affidavit is that back and forth and the information indicating conflicting accounts basically. information that the investigation was revealing indicating documents that should not have been there were still there, in contrast to what the trump team was communicating to the government. >> that's a great point. the conflicting accounts of how this was handled. elie, let's talk about the law here for a moment because as always with events like this, we

have different descriptions and reactions from different ends of the political perspective. but when you look at this affidavit, what does the law say about holding information that is of national security sensitivity in an unsecure facility as a former president when it has not been substantively declassified? >> well, jim, first of all, the first thing on the law. when there's a question about was this search justified, was it warranted. legally speaking all that prosecutors have to do is show probable cause that at least one crime was committed and that they'll find evidence of that crime at the location. we've now seen the affidavit. we've seen the doj over 37 pages lays out that evidence to the satisfaction of a judge. now, with respect to those underlying crimes, just simply having documents off site in a nonsecure facility, even if they're classified or sensitive, is not in itself enough to charge any individual criminally. you have to show an individual's

knowledge and consent. and i think some of the evidence that we saw in the affidavit today could go directly to that. for example, as carrie just pointed out, the fact that some of these documents were returned but others were not. some people were making decisions there. the fact that these highly sensitive documents were founding, to use the term from the affidavit, unfoldered and mixed in with other documents in places where they wouldn't ordinarily be stored and kept, that tells us that somebody dealt with those documents, somebody moved them around, somebody hence had to be aware of their contents. and if you can pin down who that person was and the person was generally aware what they were doing was wrong, you don't have to show they knew every nuance of the statute but generally knew their conduct was wrong or illegal, that's what you need to prove a crime. >> understood, and that's important because they have to prove it. i do want to read a portion of the affidavit from a letter the doj counsel sent to the former president's counsel on june 8th, two months before the search.

we ask that the room at mar-a-lago where the documents have been stored be secured and that all of the boxes that were moved from the white house to mar-a-lago, along with any other items in that room, be preserved in that room in their current condition until further notice. end of quote. if that room was not in fact secure and there was a lot of talk prior that maybe they just wanted a new lock to be put on there, but it seems more clear they wanted a genuinely secure facility there, what would that mean legally for the former president? >> well, what it means is that he had knowledge and it was communicated to him from the government that these documents needed to be secured. so there's a piece of this where all of -- this search could have never occurred had the documents simply been returned. and instead what was happening is the government had to routinely go back and keep asking, well, if you're not going to return them now, now we at least need to secure you,

because there's the criminal prosecution of this, but there's the national security equities that are at stake. and the national security equities are first and foremost that the information be protected. so even while the government was engaging in an investigation about obstruction and about mishandling of classified information, really from a national security equity perspective, the most important thing is to get those documents stored securely. so that's what that letter is about. >> understood. listen, so much to digest here. it was quite a day from this country. thank you all for walking us all through it. coming up next, we'll have more on the political reaction tonight, especially from the former president's inner circle. later, the theft of the diary of president biden's daughter, ashleigh. the two who pleaded guilty to it and the back story of how it got into their hands. that and much more ahead on "a.c. 360." now i'm taking on new projects on the regular.

we always dreamed of having this property, so - i want to make my yard look as beautiful as butters, here. butters. how are you doing over there? we do both vegetables and large mouth bass. yep. we've got tons of them, don't we, buddy? there are millions of ways to make the most of your land. learn how to make the most of yours at deere.com new astepro allergy. no allergy spray is faster. with the speed of astepro, almost nothing can slow you down. because astepro starts working in 30 minutes, while other allergy sprays take hours. and astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free allergy spray.

now without a prescription. astepro and go. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ this is the moment. for a treatment for moderate-to-severe eczema. cibinqo — fda approved. 100% steroid free. not an injection, cibinqo is a once-daily pill for adults who didn't respond to previous treatments. and cibinqo helps provide clearer skin and less itch.

cibinqo can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb. before and during treatment, your doctor should check for infections and do blood tests. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b or c, have flu-like symptoms, or are prone to infections. do not take with medicines that prevent blood clots. serious, sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma, lung, skin and other cancers, serious heart-related events, and blood clots can happen. people 50 and older with heart disease risk factors have an increased risk of serious heart-related events or death with jak inhibitors. this is the moment. but we've only just begun. speak with your doctor about cibinqo today. an innovation from pfizer. psst psst. [sfx: monster roaring and people screaming] allergies don't have to be scary. flonase sensimist stops your body from overreacting to allergens with a non-drowsy, ultra-lightweight mist. psst psst...flonase. all good! ["only wanna be with you" by hootie & the blowfish] discover is accepted at 99% of places in the u.s.

["only wanna be with you" by hootie & the blowfish] the unknown is not empty. it's a storm that crashes, and consumes, replacing thought with worry. but one thing can calm uncertainty. an answer. uncovered through exploration, teamwork, and innovation. an answer that leads to even more answers. mayo clinic. you know where to go.

we gave you a taste at the top of the reaction from the former president and former acting chief of staff mick mulvaney. his complaint that all the fbi found were, quote, just documents. try telling that to klaus fuque or more recently david petraeus. the former president's spokesman weighed in saying today's release of the redacted affidavit proves the biden administration is up to no good. as for republicans who are not buying the excuses, listen to gop strategist karl rove. >> my sense is they were asking for a year and a half, and why -- why he was holding on to these materials when he had no legal authority to do so under the presidential records act is beyond me. >> he could turn out to be an exception. tonight let's get perspective from cnn senior political commentator and former obama advisor david axelrod and alyssa

farrah-griffin. good to have you both on tonight. alyssa, i understand the questions coming from the right on this, the president's supporters, about how unusual itself for the fbi to go into a former president's home. that said, you don't have to look back far to remember the reaction from some of those very same people to hillary clinton's handling of classified information on her private email server here. i wonder, what's your reaction when you hear that -- it's not -- it's not monolithic, but nearly monolithic support for the president and criticism of this raid? >> well, certain things should obviously be above partisan politics and our national security is one of those things that should be. i was working on capitol hill with the oversight committee when we were looking into potential mishandling of former secretary of state hillary clinton's emails that may have contained classified information. now, what we saw established today were three really

important points. the former president had top secret classified information. he had multiple times and opportunities to give it back or to secure it properly in a scif until he properly returned it, and the department of justice seemed to be genuinely afraid that putting more information out there could put fbi agents at risk or witnesses cooperating. these are damning facts. so the quick sort of reactive response from my fellow republicans to say this is no big deal, mick mulvaney is a friend but he is wrong on this one, i'm just going to be wrong. i held a ts/sci security clearance when i was in government. the information marked as ts if it gets into the wrong hands could pose grave threat to national security. this is potential american lives, ally lives, sources and methods that we use. this is an extremely serious, serious thing that we're facing. >> no question. david axelrod, i just want to ask you by comparison, how did you, how did your colleagues in the obama administration treat

such top secret, particularly top secret and the categories we're speaking about in those documents removed from the former president's home, how did you treat them? did you take them into special secure facilities when you were using them? did you take any of them home? >> yeah, i mean there's a prescribed procedure for dealing with these materials, jim. whether you served in a democratic administration or previous republican administrations, i'm sure that you behaved -- i'm not surprised to hear karl rove react the way he did. i was in scifs. i was in the situation room, you know, when sensitive matters were being discussed, when materials were being examined, and there is a very, very specific procedure for -- this is so alien to me and i think to most people who worked in the white house. the idea that anyone, a president or anyone else, could walk out of the white house with hundreds of documents, some of them some of the most sensitive

documents relating to national security and hang on to them for months and months and months and resist returning them, you know, i don't know how this is going to shake out legally, but it's appalling from a national security standpoint. it underscores the problem with the former president, which is he has absolutely no regard for rules or laws or norms or institutions. and in this case, his disregard for them had real potential ramifications for the safety of people who are essential to america's security. >> during my brief service in government i had a top secret sci clearance as well. i remember the great concern that folks involved at a much lower or even high level took when handling those documents. alyssa, the redacted affidavit makes reference to some of these highly classified documents containing, quote, handwritten notes by the former president. was that something he would do a lot in your experience? and what kind of notes might he

make? >> yeah, that was very common. something as simple as if he was happy with a news article that you helped shape, he would write a note and sign it and hand it back to you. i have things and i handed to the staff secretary to archive. presidential records belong to the american public, they don't belong to the individual president. the narrative i've seen from trump supporters on the right is basically it's not illegal because these are his presidential records and it's not illegal when the president does it and he had unilateral authority to declassify. well, honestly, to president biden's point, that's an absurd point that he could just say anything, no matter how sensitive, nuclear codes on down, he can just declassify it and not go through any of the mechanisms of consulting other intelligence agencies, the defense department, and just do this at a whim. it's kind of absurd. and i think that they're falling -- they really don't

have a good argument here. you can see that they're test running some in the media. i think he's going to have to come up with something much legally more sound. >> listen, especially knowing what we know now, why declassify, for instance, information relating to a secret foreign intelligence source, right? that's a person's life that could be in danger. sorry, david. >> jim, i mean there's another why, which is why in the world would you have those documents? why would a former president need those documents? what was his -- did he think it was cool to have them? did he have an intent to do something with them? we don't know the answers to these questions yet, and that's why this investigation is important. but even if it -- even if it was just because he thought it would be cool, you know, this is clearly, clearly unacceptable. you can't operate a government like this and has dangerous implications. >> as my mom used to say, needs versus wants. david, alyssa, thanks to both of

you tonight. >> thank you. well, the clock is ticking for the former president to provide a federal judge a better explanation for why he wants what's known as a special master to oversee the review of documents retrieved from mar-a-lago. we'll have the latest on that request coming up. ♪ from boston. ♪ it means, “ok-to-beer-fest”. another sam octoberfest? nein. make it t ten! i like this guy. (cheers) ever get a sign the universe is trying to tell you something? the clues are all around us... not that one... that's the one. at university of phoenix, you could earn your master's degree in less than a year for under $11k. learn more at phoenix.edu

technically when enamel is gone, you cannot get it back. but there are ways you can repair it. i'm excited about pronamel repair because it penetrates deep into the tooth to help actively repair acid-weakened enamel. i recommend pronamel repair to my patients. i'm a performing artist. so a healthy diet is one of the most important things. i also feel the same way about my dog. we were feeding her dry, triangle shaped ingredients long as the yellow brick road. we didn't know how bad it was for her until we actually got the good food. we got her the farmer's dog sent in the mail. it was all fresh, when she started eating healthier, she started being more active and smiling more, running more, playing more. i want my dog to have a healthy and long life. the farmer's dog really helps that out. see the benefits of fresh food at betterforthem.com we're carvana the company who invented car vending machines and buying a car 100 percent online

now we've created a brand new way for you to sell your car whether it's a year old, or a few years old we want to buy your car so go to carvana enter your license plate answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds when you're ready we'll come to you pay you on the spot and pick up your car that's it so ditch the old way of selling your car and say hello to the new way at carvana this is xfinity rewards. our way of showing our appreciation. with rewards of all shapes and sizes. [ cheers ] are we actually going? yes!! and once in a lifetime moments.

two tickets to nascar! yes! find rewards like these and so many more in the xfinity app. pst. girl. you can do better. at least with your big-name wireless carrier. with xfinity mobile you can get unlimited for $30 per month on the nation's most reliable 5g network. they can even save you hundreds a year on your wireless bill over t-mobile, at&t, and verizon. wow. i can do better! yes you can! i can do better, too! now you really can do better! switch to the fastest mobile service - xfinity mobile. now with the best price on two lines of unlimited. just $30 a line. the former president has just a few hours left to clarify

his demand for what is known as a special master to oversee the review of evidence in the mar-a-lago search. the judge gave his legal team until midnight tonight to clarify some basic legal points including why the court should intervene. this comes two weeks after his team waited after the search to file that lawsuit. joining me now is cnn newsroom anchor pamela brown. pam, i understand that you do have some new reporting tonight. is the trump legal team moving forward? >> i am told from a source familiar with the matter close to trump's legal team that, yes, that the team trump will be filing a response to the judge's questions in response to the initial request for a special master. so the source tells me that is something that the team is working on and it intends to file before that midnight deadline. of course what it will say and if it provides any more clarity like this judge was asking for,

that remains to be seen here, jim. but it is notable that team trump does plan to respond to this request by the midnight deadline. >> in her order, can you clarify exactly what the judge was asking the trump team to clarify? >> well, several things. it was clear this judge was perplexed by this initial request. this is supposed to be routine paperwork asking for a special master, which would be an arbiter that would come in and look at the documents to filter through whether there was any privileged information. that's a whole separate issue of whether there actually would be privileged information. so the judge said, look, you need to come back and tell me what exactly you're asking for here, whether i even have the jurisdiction to do this. you need to lay out and clarify your argument about what this means. if you say, as the team contended in its argument, that this is a violation, this search of mar-a-lago was a violation of the fourth amendment and

reasonable search and seizure, what exactly are you asking for then beyond that? and so it will be interesting to see how the trump legal team responds to those questions. i do want to point out that there is already, and we learned more about this today in the affidavit, there was already a privilege review team from doj going through these documents taken from mar-a-lago. and so i was just talking to carrie cordero who is a legal analyst at cnn and she said there's really no reason for this request. in her words, she views this request as garbage. more like a political pr stunt more than anything here. jim. >> pamela brown, thanks so much. so let's get some perspective on do they have a case from former -- from harvard law school senior lecturer and former federal judge nancy gertner. thanks for taking the time. >> good to be on. >> granted, you, we, have not seen exactly how trump's team articulates their case, but from

a legal perspective based on what you know, do they have a case? >> no. i'm sure you want me to say more than that, but the short answer is no. they don't have a case in two respects. first of all, the person that this motion should have gone to is not a judge in another city who happened to have been appointed by former president trump, but it would go to the magistrate judge who's in charge of the case. the case is the search of mar-a-lago. and any issues with respect to that case goes to that judge. if they don't like that magistrate judge's ruling, then it goes to the duty judge who's another judge that is simply on duty in this month. and they can't just pick a judge out of the hat so that's the first thing. the judge asked what's her jurisdiction and that seems like a fair question. it seems like none. and then the other issue here is that in the search of a lawyer's office like michael cohen on the

one hand or giuliani on the other hand, you know that there will be documents that in fact the government doesn't have any business looking at with respect to other clients. so oftentimes a special master is appointed right away, an outsider to look at the documents. these documents presumably belong to the united states, and so the notion, all of them belong to the united states to the extent that they are presidential records. so he bears the burden of suggesting why anyone -- anything should be taken out of the box and anything should be looked at differently. and then the final issue is the fourth amendment issue. if there's an illegal search here, there will be time to litigate that. this is not the time. >> so let me ask you this, because as pamela noted, there is what's known as a filter team that's already going through this on behalf of the doj to look for any potentially privileged information here. can trump make the argument that they don't have his best interests at heart sufficiently,

right? in other words, that you need an outside special master or equivalent filter team to do so? >> sure. he could make that argument. it is, of course, an argument he should have made two weeks ago. so that's one issue. and then, you know, we don't presume the bad faith of the doj. the doj has a privilege team arguably separate from the investigation. you don't usually presume that that's not enough in the ordinary circumstance. so he actually could have tried to make the argument that when you're talking about a president, something special should have been done that we don't do in the odor nrdinary c. but it's a little late in the day to make that argument. that's something he should have made two weeks ago. >> that's why we have a judge on. judge nancy gertner, thanks for joining us this friday night. >> thank you. still coming up, new reports that the former president has been huddling with his legal advisers about his mounting legal woes, but who exactly is

in that circle these days? a look at who's who when it comes to giving trump his legal advice. and the bill payer, baker, and nightlight maker? that's a lot. so, adding “and student” mimight feel daunting. bubut what if a school could be there for all of you? career, and family and finances and mental health. happy birthday. well, it can. national university, supporting the whole you. when our daughter and her kids moved in with us... our bargain detergent couldn't keep up. turns out it's mostly water. so, we switched back to tide. one wash, stains are gone. [daughter] slurping don't pay for water. pay for clean. it's got to be tide. ♪ ustomer) save yourself?!

money with farmers. (burke) that's not wrong. whenou bundle your home and auto policies with farmers, you save yourself up to twenty percent. (customer) that's something. (burke) get a whole lot of something with farmers. kinda creepy. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪ ♪don't stop me♪ ♪'cause i'm having a good time♪ ♪having a good time♪ ♪i'm a shooting star leaping through the sky like a tiger♪ ♪defying the laws of gravity♪ ♪don't stop me now♪ ♪'cause i'm having a good time♪ ♪i don't wanna stop at all♪ ♪ ♪ah, da, da, da, da♪ ♪ my relationship with my credit cards wasn't good. i got into debt in college and, no matter how much i paid, it followed me everywhere. between the high interest, the fees... i felt trapped. debt, debt, debt. so i broke up with my credit card debt and consolidated it

into a low-rate personal loan from sofi. i finally feel like a grown-up. break up with bad credit card debt. get a personal loan with no fees, low fixed rates, and borrow up to $100k. go to sofi.com to view your rate. sofi. get your money right. ♪ for decades, i've worked at the intersection of domestic violence and homelessness. so when prop 27 promised solutions to homelessness, i took a good, hard look. it's not a solution. 90% of the money goes to the out-of-state corporations who wrote it. very little is left for the homeless. don't let corporations exploit homelessness to pad their profits. vote no on 27.

with the deadline quickly approaching for the former president to explain his request for a special master, his legal woes have become more apparent. in recent days he's been seen

huddled with his legal team. he is struggling in his hunt for a high profile florida attorney. the president's current and former legal advisers have come under fire for their false, sometimes outrageous statements. 360's randi kaye has the details on the attorneys who have had trump's ear lately. >> reporter: when you want to do something shady, you get your shady friends to help you. that's christina bobb, the former host of the right-wing one america news network talking about the search at mar-a-lago. she also worked for then president trump in homeland security but is now one of the faces of trump's legal team in the aftermath of the mar-a-lago search. >> i'm a little befuddled as to why they would do such a drastic thing so disrespecting and dishonoring other than the fact that it's a political tool. >> reporter: throughout his presidency and after, trump has used the ever-changing cast of characters on his legal team to operate as his own personal pr machine. and the outlandish claims have

known no bounds. listen to lawyer sidney powell who for years has been pushing the false narrative of massive fraud in the 2020 presidential election. >> it's been organized and conducted with the help of silicon valley people, the big tech companies, the social media companies and even the media companies. and i'm going to release the kracken. >> reporter: powell was part of the elite strike force, a team of lawyers who claimed to be rooting out election fraud. they falsely accused dominion voting system and smartmatic of helping orchestrate the alleged fraud by using an algorithm in their machines to flip votes from then president trump to joe biden. powell was pressed to provide proof during this tense interview with the australian broadcast corporation. >> what do you have in your case? you have a bunch of dodgy affidavits that don't add up. you have a group of people with

dubious credentials. >> that's your characterization. that's all your characterization. >> so far you've provided no evidence -- >> you might as well be working for dominion and smartmatic. >> reporter: dominion is now suing powell and trump's former personal lawyer, rudy giuliani. giuliani made so many false claims about voting in arizona, georgia and pennsylvania. >> dead people voted. over 300,000 ballots were counted in secret. >> reporter: that a new york court suspended his law license. >> if we're wrong, we will be made fools of. but if we're right, a lot of them will go to jail. so let's have trial by combat. >> reporter: another attorney, jenna ellis, had also signed on as part of the so-called elite strike force. listen to how she danced around the fact there was no evidence of massive voter fraud in the 2020 election. >> i think it depends on your definition of massive.

so even if there is any instance of fraud, you know, it doesn't have to be millions and millions of ballots, it only has to be enough to tip the scales. >> reporter: but there wasn't enough to tip the scales, not even close. so it's no surprise the competency of trump's legal team has come into question, along with advice they have given him over the years. take, for example, the advice of trump lawyer alina habba has recently suggested the former president wants the doj to release the names of the witnesses who helped secure the search warrant for mar-a-lago. that raises all kinds of serious security concerns. >> what i would advise him is to ask them to uncover everything so that we can see what is going on. i understand the witness protection issue. >> reporter: legal advice seemingly for an audience of one. randi kaye, cnn. just ahead, a twisted tale involving president biden's daughter and her stolen personal journal. details ahead.

new astepro allergy. now available without a prescription.

astepro is the first and only 24-hour steroid free spray. while other allergy sprays take hours astepro starts working in 30 minutes. so you can... astepro and go. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ "shake your thang" by salt n pepa

in order for small businesses to thrive,

they need to be smart. efficient. agile. and that's never been more important than it is right now. so for a limited time, comcast business is introducing small business savings. call now to get powerful internet for just 39 dollars a month. with no contract. and a money back guarantee. all on the largest, fastest reliable network. from the company that powers more businesses than anyone else. call and start saving today. comcast business. powering possibilities.

this week a different saga that stretches back to the 2020 election is at an end, at least it appears so for the two individuals who pleaded guilty thursday to stealing and selling a personal journal and other items belonging to the president's daughter, ashley biden. that is the headline. the backstory is detailed and tha dark. cnn's athena jones has the details. >> i grew up in wilmington, delaware, and had a fairly normal childhood. >> reporter: ashley biden's tax records, cell phone abnd a handwritten journal containing highly personal entries, two florida residents admitted to stealing and selling to project veritas. pleading guilty in federal court in new york to conspiracy of

interstate personal property. the latest revelation in a sore did tale that stretches back to the final weeks of the 2020 election. in june 2020 court documents say amy harris was the guest in the same room in delray beach, florida, where biden's daughter had been staying with a friend. ashley biden had departed a few days earlier but was temporarily storing her journal and other items, including a digital camera and digital storage card containing private family photographs at her friend's house, court documents say. harris stole biden's property and later enlisted robert kurlander to help her sell it to the highest bidder. first they targeted the trump campaign, attending a september 6, 2020, fund-raiser to drum up interest. according to the filing, the trump team rebuffed the pair. campaign can't use it. they want it to go to the fbi. it has to be done in a different way. kurlander reached out to project

veritas, whose founder, james o'keefe, said in a november 2021 video -- >> late last year we were approached by tipsters claiming they had a copy of ashley biden's diary. we had never met or heard of the tip tipsters. it had been abandoned in a room in which ms. biden stayed at the time. >> reporter: after the pair used an encrypted messaging app to share photos of biden's stolen property, the organization paid them to bring the property to new york city in september 2020. in new york, a project veritas executive agreed to pay harris $10,000 for the material and asked for more of biden's personal items to help authenticate the journal, promising to pay the pair for the additional material, the filing alleges. but the pair returned to florida. kurlander texting harris, i'm expecting that they're going to pay up to $100,000 each, maybe more. harris soon retrieved the additional biden material and a project veritas employee flew to florida to pick it up. the organization paid harris and

kurlander $20,000 each. o'keefe saying the fbi had searched his employees' residences. >> i awoke to the news the apartments and homes of project veritas journalists or former journalists had been raided by fbi agents. >> reporter: neither the organization or any of its employees have been charged in the case. in a statement, project veritas insisted they did nothing wrong. athena jones, cnn, new york. coming up, at a time when anti-semitic incidents are on the rise, we're going to give you a tour of the u.s. holocaust memorial museum with cnn's wolf blitzer, the son of holocaust survivors. any year. any condition. really? even if my old phone looks like this? *gagasps* dude why? *gasps* how could you? it's okay people. i've trained for this. it's not complicated. new and existing customers get a free galaxy z flip4 with a galaxy trade-in. any year. any condition.

welcome to thursday night football, only on prime video. playor the guy beside you! ay for this stadium! let's g! thursday night is now the prime ght of football. deep downfield! got it! touchdown! legendary players, amazing matchups, a new era begins. let's go! the prime night of football. only on prime video. the abcs of ckd a is for awareness, because knowing that your chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes could progress to dialysis is important. b is for belief that there may be more you can do. just remember that k is for kidneys and kerendia. for adults living with ckd in type 2 diabetes, kerendia is proven to reduce the risk of kidney failure, which can lead to dialysis. kerendia is a once-daily tablet that treats ckd differently than type 2 diabetes medications

to help slow the progression of kidney damage and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks. do not take kerendia if you have problems with your adrenal glands or take certain medications called cyp3a4 inhibitors. kerendia can cause hyperkalemia, which is high potassium levels in your blood. ask your doctor before taking products containing potassium. kerendia can also cause low blood pressure and low sodium levels. so now that you know your abcs, remember, k is for kidneys, and if you need help slowing kidney damage, ask your doctor about kerendia.

heyyy! (steins breaking) your cousin. ♪ from boston. ♪ it means, “ok-to-beer-fest”. another sam octoberfest? nein. make it ten! i like this guy. (cheers) ever get a sign the universe is trying to tell you something? the clues are all around us... not that one... that's the one. at university of phoenix, you could earn your master's degree in less than a year for under $11k.

learn more at phoenix.edu last week we told you about a new cnn documentary that explained how anti-semitic ideas once on the fringe have been moving to the mainstream. tonight at 11:00 p.m. eastern cnn is airing a new special report "never again, the united states holocaust memorial museum," a tour with our very own wolf blitzer. wolf is the child of holocaust survivors. he lost all four grandparents to the holocaust and he joins me now. wolf, i've always been moved by the stories you tell about the holocaust, how it changed you and your life, how you carry it with you. explain why this documentary is so important to share with people right now. >> it's so timely right now, jim, because of what's going on as you correctly point out. there is an increase in

anti-semitism here in the united states, indeed around the world, and there's also an increase in holocaust denial that these crazy people out there say it just was made up, there really was no holocaust. 6 million jews were not murdered by the nazis. that has sadly intensified in recent years. we thought it was really important to take a tour of the u.s. holocaust memorial museum here in washington which was created, what, 30 plus years ago by the u.s. government to remember what happened during the holocaust, because if we don't remember, god forbid, it could be repeated. so i took a tour with sarah bloomfield, the long-time museum director, who's an amazing woman. indeed all of the people who work at the museum are really amazing. hard working, dedicated, devoted. all those who were involved in founding and creating the museum deserve a lot of our credit. millions of people have toured the holocaust museum in washington, it's so important. so i wanted to take ou