new tonight, a federal judge, naming a special master who will oversee the review of more than 100 classified documents seized from mar-a-lago, and august. the news comes after weeks of legal drama between trump's lawyers, on the doj, over who should get to review these classified documents. we discuss cnn political correspondent, sara murray, cnn legal analyst, and former assistant attorney, general rogers. cnn counterterror list analysis, philip mudd, and cnn national

analyst, julia cayenne. good evening. sarah, bad news for the doj tonight. the judge, rejecting their request to continue the premiere lobe into classified documents while the review plays out. what more do you know? >> that's right. the judge, basically, set, one, i won't take the government on face value that these documents are classified. she wants a special master to review them. to, she says, she doesn't think it will cause irreparable harm for the justice department to press pause on their ability to review these documents. she said, you can still go forward with parts of their investigation. if you want to talk to witnesses about how these documents were moved, or storage, you can do that. when it comes to reviewing the documents, forensic may be presenting them before a grand jury, which is a helpful thing to do when you're in the middle of a criminal investigation. you can't do anything like that. she does say, they can brief congress, so, we are waiting to see if that will come to fruition. she put a timeline on all the saying, the special master's until november 30th to complete his work.

>> sarah, the judge appointing district judge, raymond theory as a special master. what can you tell us about him? >> he is a senior judge in the eastern district of brooklyn. if you are a senior judge, you have more time on your calendar, which is good. this seems like it will be a time consuming task. he did a seven year stint on the fisa court, so he is someone who is used to dealing with sensitive issues, and sensitive materials. a purse was put forward by the trump team, and the only person the justice department, also agreed on. so, this is the only name that both sides were in agreement over being the special master in this. >> jennifer, in the judges order tonight, she is raising doubts about whether all of the documents are in classified, and you say the judges reasoning is indefensible. pamela had an earlier, calling it incoherent. do you think that she has a reason to suggest a rollercoaster for third?

>> that's what she said, but there's nothing behind it. she got one affidavit from the government, talking about the classified documents, another nation will be irreparably harmed if they can continue to utilize those. she didn't get evidence from the trump team, at all. she only has one piece of evidence, and that is all she has to rule on. in their brief, the trump folks didn't even say the documents were declassified. they said, maybe, there were. that is no basis at all that there is to find an issue as to classification. judges are supposed to decide based on the evidence and, the law, and they gave her nothing. they gave her no law, they gave her no facts. all she has is the undisputed facts, and the law provided by the justice department. there's no basis. >> what's going on with this judge? >> the last sentence, or maybe the second to last, with the last order tells you all you need to know. she says, listen, i need to go back to the fact that this is an extraordinary circumstance, and this really comes down to

the inherent, to exceptional nature, of where the plaintiffs. at the end of the day, it's trump, and she will see a special treatment that no one would get. contrary to the facts, contrary to the law, and that's what she's done. >> she said there's no precedence, omitted what i want. is that what we're getting at? >> there's plenty of law. the doj gave it to or why there is no privileges here, why these documents are classified, and there's a possible interest and it. she doesn't even do legal analysis. she says, i'm not buying what doj is selling, despite the facts, and the evidence, and admitted to it for trump. >> let me jump in here because the special master said -- sorry, can you talk about the judge's ruling? >> i find it, rarely, what i say, comical about national security stuff. i spent my life doing, it but this is comical. let me explain why. when you look at a classified document, you saw cover sheets in the famous photo in the search. take the cover sheet off, and

it exposes the real document. there are words on the top, we used to call headers on the business. the header on the top, and bottom of the document, as a classification. for example, top secret code word, talent keyhole. those are some of the words, and phrases, that you would see in the documents gathered at mar-a-lago. so, this question about whether the documents or classified or not, i learned to read in fifth grade, don. when it says top secret code word, let me give you a clue, that is a classified document. i'm just not sure how to take this one, don. >> julia, judge cannon is, also, questioning whether these documents actually put national security at risk. does she have a reasoning there? what is the reason? >> the opinion is something, and i wouldn't call it judging. we are going to be beholden to her reasoning, for now, and it was trying to figure out some reasonable behind it. it's futile, and we somehow

believe in the rule of law. this is an opinion that is going to harm american interests, more than she even recognizes. she thinks that she is protecting trump, and it is a issue of status. if i'm a defensive tierney, representing either a good actor, or presumably a bad actor, it was spying for the chinese, and the government has classified information with using against we to protect american interests. my first argument is to quote her opinion. to say, essentially, there is nothing we can trust about the governments classification system. that, is basically, what i would do if i were in defence attorney right now. finally, i do want to say it is what the case means for the outside world.

maybe the special magistrate is going with the information out. it wasn't a win for trump, it was a delay for trump, and he got it. he just needs to extend the runway longer, and longer, until he either decides to run, or there is some other scandal. that is what he wanted out of this. >> sarah, what do we expect more from the doj, and how far this legal battle go? >> they told the judge, when they put this many solution, essentially saying, why don't you just let us look at these 100 classified documents, move forward with criminal investigation, we're fine with the special master on the rest of it? they said, if you don't hear from you today, we will issue this, but we now heard from the judge. the judge is not giving the justice department what they are asking for, so now, we are waiting to see if they follow through with what they suggested to do, which is appeal this. as julia was just saying, it doesn't mean delays. the special master, taking through november 30th, and he

is going to do his work, regardless. it is just a question of, which pool of documents will he do it on. now, we wait, and see, and what kind of timeline will have a potential appeal. >> jennifer, the judge allowing the trump team to review these classified documents. does that pose any risks to the broader investigation here? >> probably all. he had them, who months, and months. he knows what they are, his lawyers know what they are, because he would've told them. i don't think they are concerned about that aspect of it. you may be concerned about the national security implications of trump and his team of lawyers seeing documents, or having them back again, but i think, as far as the investigation goes, they need to have them in order to have these documents against him. >> there's more people seeing these classified documents? >> they'll be clear, the lawyers will have to be clear to see them, so that's what will happen. >> there's a blow for the doj, but investigators have these documents for weeks before they had to pause. how much of the government learned in that time? >> a lot.

i think that they are presenting. we have some hints of what they're going with, and with the classified information, we can remind people, trump was giving multiple opportunities to fix the problems. just giving him the benefit of the doubt, oh, he made a mistake. they're costly saying, you can fix this, and he clearly didn't want to, and wanted to hold on to them. they have a sense of it, we have some hints of what they're going after, and including the obstruction of justice. it sounds like some people lied to the fbi about whether they were aware there was classified information, that those people may include lawyers, if not trump himself. so, it is a strong case. it is the surprise to this, and we have this notion, and lawyering with the political questioning. they defer to other branches, and their expertise. the executive branch, an expert in national security, defines the expertise within the

executive branch, and the policy. who see the judge just second guessing it, in a way, that does not defer to the expertise of the political branch. in some ways, we do not feel this is just bad legal reasoning, but really, just putting the judiciary front and center, and things that they are just not destroying. and they recognize that. >> the former president went on the radio today, and i just want to play what he said when he thought what would happen if he was indicted. here he is. >> i think that happened i think there will be problems on this country, the likes of which, we've never seen before. i don't think the united states will stand for it. >> what kind of problems, mister president? >> big problems. big problems. i don't think they stand for it. >> do you think that's an implied threat? what is he doing? >> i don't know if that's a

subtle enough answer, yes. let me be clear with this in, the world of extremism, which i follow for decades, that's what i'd refer to his validation. we have seen, on january 6th, there is a lot of people who watch leadership, whether it's lindsey graham, or other members of the white house, the president, lawyers, who watch leadership and determine whether that leadership is validating the citizens belief that they were robbed. you do not have to tell somebody to go out, and committed to active violence for them to say, well, if we were robbed, it is my constitutional right, and responsibility, to go to congress and storm it. that is the present to the mid states witnessing it and saying, let's have a redo, and the redo will happen if i'm indicted. to me, is an extremist follower, that's not a political statement, that is a statement to anyone who falls extremists can understand. that is validation, don. >> julia, what do you think of that answer? >> absolutely. it's not even hinting anymore. we used to use the word dog whistling, when we talked about trump.

this is directing. basically, don't just listen to trump's words, imagine what his supporters are hearing. they are hearing the call to action. this has been consistent. it is much stronger since he last the election, and they just need to call it what it is, which is, we have a former president who is inciting violence, as an extension of his political defeat. that's what it is now. >> thank you all very much, i appreciate it. we will be right back. the new 2023 gmc sierra at4x4x is equipped to conquer the e great outdoors... ...or the great indoors. welcome to the peak of premium off-roading. the new 2023 gmc sierra at4x. gmc. we are professional grade

we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds we'll come to you pay you on the spot then pick up your car that's it at carvana

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ "shake your thang" by salt n pepa she was supposed to be the one. i used to believe in the one. and then i realized, there's plenty of savings in the sea. what? amazon has daily deals, so every day is a chance to meet the deal that catches your eye,

that shakes your soul, that changes your destiny. i'm gonna go check on those tater tots. learn all the ways to save with amazon. yeah, i'm going to live here. only to realize... what if i can't sell my place? don't worry. sell it directly to opendoor and we'll help you buy your next one. aww. get your free offer at opendoor.com florida governor, ron desantis, taking credit for sending 50 migrants to martha's vineyard,

without any warning. >> we are not a sanctuary state, and it is better to go to a sanctuary jurisdiction, and yes, we will help facilitate that transport for you, to be able to go to greener pastures. >> these migrants came from texas, not from florida. the texas governor's office say, they were not involved in the initial plans, or the initial plans to martha's vineyard. abbott says, he is responsible for the arrival of two buses, of over 100 migrants from texas, the vice presidents residence, in d.c. this morning. let's bring out democratic congressman, colin allred, of texas. congressman, thank you for joining us, thank you so much. what is your reaction to the governor sending these buses, and migrants, with no heads up to places like martha's vineyard, or d.c.? do you think that they should have coordinate it? >> first, it seems like, they lied to the migrants, to try

and get them on this flight to martha's vineyard. of, course these are stunts. but it is also dehumanizing, don. when you dehumanize people, you can treat them however you want, because it doesn't matter. they are like you and me. they don't deserve to be treated with dignity or to have any kinds of rights. that's not who we are as americans, but it is a political step, intended to get these governors on fox news, in the hope, that they can become the next trump. certainly, i think doing things like this is not consistent with who we are as a country, and certainly, not with who we are as texans. >> there are resources. some of the places on the border do not have enough resources to, really, taken all of these people. do they have an overall point? my question is, should they have coordinated with these municipalities, or with martha's vineyard, or d.c., or whatever, if they had planned on doing this? >> listen, we can do more. we need to fix our immigration system. it is broken.

we are trying to address the root causes by why so many folks are leaving their home countries, and try to make sure that they can stay where they are from. but, doing it like this does not make sense, don. it's just intended to cause chaos, and to get these folks headlines. this is, exactly, what they want. for us to have this discussion, and talk about whether they should've coordinated something like that, when we do have a process for handling these things. this is not the process. certainly, up to governors. >> congressman, listen to my point, please. what i'm asking is, if these towns, or cities or, municipalities, or communities, if they do not have enough resources, then, what should they be doing? what can be done? i know that there are steps in place, but still, it takes a lot of man power to handle these people. so, what should they do? do you think it is fair for them to send to other places if they do not have resources, and perhaps, coordinate with those places to get help?

>> i think there is a scenario in which, if we work together as a country, we can find ways to spread the load, responsibly, on. that is, i think, what you are hinting at. >> exactly. >> that is something we can do. certainly, it is not what we are seeing here. especially sending migrants to the vice presidents residence, or dropping them off at airports where they don't know anything about where they are going, or why they are their, or lying about how to get them on the plane, or what you are offering them. certainly, that's not what we're talking about. it's not a responsible process. it's just intended to get the attention on fox news. >> thank you, that is a stunt, but you answered the overall thrust of my question, and i appreciate that about lightning the load. thank you so much, i appreciate it. governor abbott says, your state will continue sending migrants to sanctuary cities like d.c., until president biden, and vice president harris's, so that they do their jobs to secure the border. vice president harris says, she's confident the border is secure. is not the case? does the biden administration

need to do more? >> i do think we need to fix our immigration system. that includes doing work at the border. we are seeing a surge in migrants, and it is being caused by lots of conditions, that are leaving these folks to leave their homes, to risk their lives, on this very treacherous journey, to try to come to this country. some try to seek asylum, and that's a process that, we certainly, need to improve. our asylum process, incredibly broken. but this all needs a comprehensive approach to our immigration system. one that is geared towards our current economy, and the needs of that economy, but also, allows us to process folks in the humane way, and not treat them in this way, like they are pawns. that is not who we are, as americans, we don't treat people like this. if we saw another country doing this, in another part of the world, we would call it something else. we would say, it is based on bigotry, or trying to cause fear in those communities. that is not, i think, a responsible way to approach this. >> a conservative guest on this program would say, there is an

open border, and that democrats want to open borders. are either of those true? both? either? >> certainly, it is not true. the border is certainly not open. you talk about the number of apprehensions we are making, they're out, because we catch folks. they come through. we also talk about immigration reform, democrats and congress stand ready, right now to, work on immigration reform. so that we don't have colleagues on the other side of the aisle work with us, and try to find a common sense pathway forward. it is a political issue for them, because the leader of their party has used this, from the very first moment he announced this candidacy, as a way to drum up votes, by scaring people. >> congressman, we are also learning tonight, president biden will meet, in person, with the families of detained americans brittney griner, and paul whelan. a senior ministration official tells cnn, there has been movement, but not a breakthrough on the efforts to free them. this comes right after the former ambassador, bill richardson, got back from

moscow, where he was trying to get something done for these folks. where do you see this heading? are you optimistic about it? >> you know, first of all, i think president biden is somebody who has lost a wife, a daughter, an adult son, and he knows what it is like when your family is in crisis. he understands, these families are in crisis. i had a chance today, actually, to meet with families, and folks who are being detained, wrongfully, abroad. whether that's in russia, or a ron, and my heart goes out to them. i do actually think, in the case of brittney griner, and paul whelan and, that we are making progress, and we will have a resolution. the question will be, where do we land? what will the russians be willing to accept? it looks, because we're trying to bring back to americans, that they will ask for at least two russians to be released. in some cases, there are things that we cannot provide. just because you do not hear daily news about it, does not mean that it is being worked on. i know, for a fact, we are

still pursuing these leads, trying to get a deal with the russians. >> let me ask you about this. the u.s. has been funding ukraine's efforts to fight back against russia's invasion. the ukrainians have been making major gains on the battlefield. could this, ultimately, work against the u.s., and hostage negotiations? >> you know, obviously, the war in ukraine precipitated their invasion, and makes some more difficult negotiations. that does not mean that we should not support ukrainians in their efforts to protect their own country, and for their own freedom. they are using the tools that are extremely effective. as you said, they fight with incredible bravery, and i think the whole world can see, free people, that want to remain free. certainly, we want to do everything we can to bring our americans home. but, i don't think that we should consider the two and conflict. >> congressman, thank you so much, i appreciate your time, thank you for coming on. >> thank you. >> president biden, responding

today in florida governor, ron desantis, sending a plane full of undocumented immigrants to martha's vineyard. we will tell you what he said, that is next. (man 1) we're like yodelingng high. [yodeling] yo-de-le-he... (man 2) hey, no. (man 1) we should go even higher! (both) woah! (man 2) i'm good. (vo) adventure, elevated. (man 1) let's go lower. (vo) discover more in the subaru outback wilderness. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. subaru is the national park foundation's largest corporate donor.

this is the sound of better breathing. fasenra is an add-on treatment for asthma driven by eosinophils. it helps prevent asthma attacks, improve breathing, and lower use of oral steroids. fasenra is not a rescue medication or for other eosinophilic conditions. fasenra may cause allergic reactions. get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth and tongue, or trouble breathing. don't stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. headache and sore throat may occur. ask your doctor about fasenra.

lactaid is 100% real milk, just without the lactose. tastes great in our iced coffees too. which makes waking up at 5 a.m. to milk the cows a little easier. (moo) mabel says for you, it's more like 5:15. man: mom, really?

president biden, slamming republican governors for sending migrants to northern states, in protest of his administration's immigration policies. here's what he said, just tonight. >> instead of working with us on solutions, republicans are playing politics with human life, using them as props. what they are doing, simply, is wrong. it is not american, it is reckless. we have a process in place to manage migrants at the border,

where we will make sure, it is safe, orderly, and humane. republican officials should not interfere with that process by waging a political stunt. >> i want to bring in cnn chief political correspondent, dana bash, and senior political analyst, ron brownstein. good evening to both of you. thank you for joining. president biden, slamming republicans for their treatment of these migrants. this is going to be a hotly contested issue, straight through the midterms, and the political brinkmanship is, only, just starting. >> that's right. this is happening because of the midterms, because the texas governor is on the ballot. the florida governor, is on the ballot. this is, also, happening in large part because of what you were discussing with congressman allred of texas, which is that here, in washington, they haven't been able to get anything done, in decades. don, i cannot tell you how many hours of my life i will not get

back, standing in hallways, in the united states capitol, watching, and waiting, for members of congress who claim that they are working to a bipartisan deal on immigration reform, and i should not say claim. for the most part, they are working in good faith. but, they could never get it done. so, for the most part, president biden is right. there has been a lack of will on the gop side. a very big divide, on the gop side. but, i remember, maybe in the mid, to 2000s, some democrats, also, played some politics with the notion of doing this in a broad, comprehensive, bipartisan way. that is the reason why this is happening. we just don't have a national policy. it is so fraught with base politics that, do not take into account that these are human beings, that they just dumped off on the corner, in a residential neighborhood, here and, washington. >> a cnn spoke with migrants,

it is ahead of martha's vineyard. it was what dana said. do you think that it could backfire on republicans? >> i think the first question is whether it is legal. biden was commenting, tonight, a little bit, as if he was, almost, an outside observer. he is the leader of the executive branch, including the justice department. the department of homeland security. gavin newsom wrote an example to the attorney general today, questioning whether there was a legal basis to seek an injunction to stop this behavior. the conversation was to point. the question of whether this burden should be distributed more evenly across the country is a different one from whether governors have the unilateral authority to take people, some of whom are asylum seekers. once you are an asylum seeker,

you are legally present in the country. there is no authority, under federal immigration law, for governors to say, we can exclude these people from our city. i spoke to the former president of the american immigration lawyers association, david leopold, who said, there was, potentially, multiple avenues that the justice department can use to contest this in court. who knows if they will win, ultimately, in the supreme court, but i do think the question whether the biden administration can do more to condemn this? sort of the same issue we've had throughout his presidency, the only way to take onus from vaccines, to masks, to voting, coming back. can they do more to try to reassert federal privacy over red state governors, that are moving very aggressively for a whole series of policies, very much, to the right? >> round of santas, from florida, he flew to planes of migrants there, from texas. they didn't have anything to do with florida. how much of this is about raising his national profile, and have a potential

presidential run? >> i think ron desantis has, very much, concluded that the essence of trumpism, the fuel in it, is seen by the base, and it is enough liberal institutions. the fight, itself, more than the terrain in which you are fighting, is the essence of it. my colleague said the cruelty is the point. but, i think, this kind of fits in with his fight with disney, his fight trying to control not only schools, but private businesses. he wants to be seen as a culture warrior. the washington post got audio of him talking to republican donors, over the weekend, in which we previewed this. it is worth noting, very quickly, the history of what we're talking about. both in 2006, and 2013, the senate passed on a bipartisan filibuster proof majority, which included mitch mcconnell

the first time. a comprehensive immigration reform, including a pathway to legalization for people here, and, each time, six and 13, the republican-controlled house refused to take it out, despite, the first time, the treaties of george w. bush, the republican president. so, there's a history here where bipartisanship has been achieved on this issue, but in an early marker of the parties movement into what it has become. much more uniformly hostile to not only legal, but illegal immigration that the republican house refused to take it up anytime, when it could've been done, you know six, or oh 13. >> those are instances you mentioned earlier, dana. i want to speak with you, first, before we let you go. abortion, another major issue heading into november. there's a republican senator, lindsey graham, said to you. this is a state of the union, just last month. watch this. >> i have been consistent. i think states should decide the issue of marriage, and states should decide the issue

of abortion. i have respect for south carolina. south carolina voters, here, a trust to define marriage, and to deal with the issue of abortion. >> now, hughes posey -- proposing a national pregnancy ban after 15 weeks of presidency. you're talking about why they change their tune. what are they saying? >> let's just be clear, it is a black and white a change. he said is there, we want to be left of the states, and you're right. now he is saying, there should be a 15-week ban. the answer is not about policy, it is not about philosophy, it is about the midterms. it is about the fact that republicans might want to talk about immigration. they really want to talk about the economy, and high inflation. they do not want to talk about the issue of abortion. that is what all democrats are talking about. that is a huge voter issue, across the battleground states. the democrats have, really,

been able to define the republican opponents on this issue. i'm told that senator graham is seeing that. he did change his tacked, he did change his strategy, and, it is because he believes that republicans have their heads in the sand, it don't understand, the gop needs to come out with something that is not a total ban on abortion. that is something that, at least, allows abortion up to some form of viability. exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of a mother, because a lot of states are not doing that. it is hurting republican candidates in both states. i was in michigan, i was in ohio, and i heard not just from democratic voters, don, but traditionally republican voters. they are concerned about the issue of abortion. quite telling. >> i have to say dana, i said something wrong.

15 weeks of pregnancy, i'm not sure what i said, but, regardless. >> 15 weeks. it's been a long week. >> don, quickly, it is if a goal to dampen the issue is putting out fires of gasoline. it is a way that could make things tougher for republicans, and it was an expensive abortion laws, he would preempt. >> that was why mitch mcconnell hits this. >> okay, we can give it a stop. >> thank you, see you. the wisconsin senate race, in a dead heat, right now. the republican candidate, betting big money that he can take down the democrat on one quart issue. we will tell you what it is, next.

oh, wow. but we got to sell our houses. well, almost perfect. don't worry. just sell directly to opendoor. close in a matter of days. get your free offer at opendoor.com we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds we'll come to you pay you on the spot

then pick up your car that's it at carvana

the wisconsin senate race, one of the most competitive heading into november. they show the two term incumbent, senator ron johnson, and republican, neck and neck with democratic challenger, lieutenant governor, mandela barnes. now, with a less than two months until election day, johnson, and his gop allies, focus on crime, which is a growing problem in wisconsin. and, they are painting lawrence is soft on the issue.

but, he's fighting back. more tonight from omar jimenez. >> i will make sure our police have the resource, and trainings they need, to keep our community safe. >> they will reallocate money away from the police department. >> in the dead even wisconsin senate race, republican, ron johnson, and democratic lieutenant governor, mandela barnes, are engaged in a fierce debate over public safety. >> dangerously liberal on crime. >> our folks are completely motivated. >> brian is a conservative strategist, and wisconsin. >> there are people concerned about their personal safety. >> it is not just a core city problem. it is on a much larger scale, the awareness of it. >> wisconsin did see more than 70% jump in homicides from 2019, to 2021. like many states did. red, and blue. driven by a number of factors, including, the covid-19 pandemic. in august, republicans, nationwide, spent $11 million on ads about crime, but, 25

million on ads about inflation. then, in the first two weeks of september, 9 million on inflation, but also, now, 9 million on crime. in wisconsin, jumping on comments made by lieutenant governor barnes, weeks after the murder of george floyd, in 2020. >> we need to invest more neighborhood services, and programming. where that money come from? well, it can come from over loaded budgets and police departments. >> but, he is making clear, now, that is not what he is running on. >> their clinical want to defund the police, and apologized, but that's a lot. >> a statewide poll, is a top issue, it's still ranks behind with voter concerns. it also shows that johnson is supported by 97% of republicans who pulled, and barnes, by 96% of democrats. >> we are talking, less than 200,000 voters who, are genuinely, torn about what they are leading to. >> does that make it difficult to strategize? >> there's crime, and public

safety issues, which is a base motivator for republicans. but, i do not think that crime, or safety, is what determines where those 150, to 200,000 swing voters land. >> tom otto, one of those swing voters. voting trump, and ron johnson in 2016, barr, instead democratic oven or tony evers, in 2018, then, biden in 2020. >> i usually don't make my decision until i'm standing in line, getting ready to vote. >> while he mentioned crime is a concern, inflation came to mind first. >> people, i don't think, realize how bad it is. yeah, you come to a farmers market, it's wonderful, but how many people can afford it? >> democrats, in the swing county, hope for a pick up, and worry about the alternative. >> do you feel optimistic, heading into this election? >> no. fear. >> and, a deeply polarized state, like wisconsin, both parties count on their messaging to persuade voters in the middle, and motivate their

bases to turn out. >> one thing in wisconsin, ron johnson has shown, when he speaks directly to the people, in his television advertising, he wins them over. >> these crime attacks on farms? they may work on republicans, but they will be a game-changer to the middle part of the electorate. ultimately, this is what it will come down to. >> they announced today, a coalition of law enforcement officers who are endorsing him from across the state. another issue we heard from voters on, is social security. a majority of voters here, and wisconsin, are over 50 years old. senator ron johnson has floated changing programs, like social security, and medicare, from mandatory funding, to discretionary. to be decided on an annual basis. that's, elucidation, education, and more, will all be considered by these crucial swing voters as we get closer to november 8th. don? >> omar, thank you very much. back in london, the lies of the queen is now four miles long

with an 11-hour wait time. cnn's beshear is standing in line, and we're going to hear from her, next. so when her windshield got a crcrack... she scheduled with safelite in jusust a few clicks. we came to her house... ...replaced the windshield... and installed new wipers. that's service on her time. >> grandkid: here you go! >> tech: wow, thank you! >> customer and grandkids: bye! >> tech: bye! don't wait, schedule now. >> singers: ♪ safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ some days, it felt like asthma was holding me back. but asthma has taken enough. so i go triple... with trelegy. with 3 medicines in 1 inhaler,... it's the only once-daily treatment for adults that takes triple action against asthma symptoms. trelegy helps make breathing easier,... improves lung function,... and lasts for 24 hours. go triple...

go trelegy. because asthma has taken enough. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler... for sudden breathing problems. trelegy contains a medicine that increases risk of hospitalizations and death from asthma problems when used alone. when this medicine is used with an inhaled corticosteroid,... like in trelegy,... there is not a significant increased risk of these events. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase risk of thrush and infections. get emergency care for serious allergic reactions. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. don't let asthma take another breath. go triple. go trelegy. ask your doctor about trelegy today.

♪ it wasn't me by shaggy ♪ you're never responsible for unauthorized purchases on your discover card.

so prince william today talking outside of the castle outside about how difficult this week has been. listen. >> it has been challenging. >> so that is thousands of people lined up to pay their respects to the queen at westminster hall.

that line, four miles long, with an estimated 11-hour wait time. joining me now cnn reporter mitt beshear, in line with the crowds in london. nada, good morning to you there. i should say, my goodness, the queue, as they say there, is incredibly long. but that's not stopping people from paying their respects to the queen. what kind of stories are you hearing from people about what queen elizabeth meant to them? >> it is remarkable to see how many people are in this queue waiting for the opportunity to pay their respects to the queen. we are just across the river from westminster palace, and this is where people are waiting to go the. queen is lying in state in the hall of westminster. it is, quite cold tonight we. we're here at the same time last night, and it was a lot warmer. but he was, shorter about 2.9 miles long at this time last night. in fact, the wait time was only six hours. it's a little tougher tonight.

but we had this for the cute people so upbeat, many people say they have made their friends along the way. we have met these lovely people this morning. we've got martin, vicky, ali, and amy, who have been waiting. they have traveled around four hours to get here. they have been waiting about eight hours. >> it's been fine. when we've been moving. it's just when we had a stop for a while further back and it was just cold and it hits you hard. fine on the whole, really. and it's made all the better for bumping into people and just having a bit of a laugh along the way, really, keeping spirits up. so yeah, it's been okay. >> and you guys met in the queue. you have become friends over the way. how important is it for you to be part of this, to pay respects? >> it's really important, i think. we're not going to see anything like this in the future. being military as well, it's where my allegiance to the queen is important to me, and

it's great to see such a big turnout of people wanting to pay those respects to a magistrate. >> and for you guys this is a moment of history. how are you feeling? are you looking forward to? this is a a historic moment for you? >> definitely. there will never be anything like this again in my lifetime or there is really. never going to see another queen. so yeah. >> so you've been in the queue for a long time. how are you holding out? >> it's been cold, but it has been all right, yeah. >> that really is the message we have been hearing. it is a historic moment a, moment many people are sharing with their families, but also the message up and down the line that they have been making friends along the way. this is the moment they will be cherishing for years to come. don? >> smart, family wearing puffy jackets. you gotta get one now if you want to stay warm. we appreciate this. thanks so much. thanks for watching, everyone. our cocoverage continues.

yeah, i'm really excitited. alright, that sounds great. soso i'm making plans for right now. ♪ like going back to my roots and opening my own restaurant. ♪ start your plan today with a northwestern mutual financial advisor and spend your life living. ♪ we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculatesour car's value and gives you a real offer in second we'll come to you pay you on the spot en pick up your car that's it at carvana

when people come, they say they've tried lots of diets, nothing's worked or they've lost the same 10, 20, 50 pounds

over and over again. they need a real solution. i've always fought with 5-10 pounds all the time. eating all these different things and nothing's ever working. i've done the diets, all the diets. before golo, i was barely eating but the weight wasn't going anywhere. the secret to losing weight and keeping it off is managing insulin and glucose. golo takes a systematic approach to eating that focuses on optimizing insulin levels. we tackle the cause of weight gain, not just the symptom. when you have good metabolic health, weight loss is easy. i always thought it would be so difficult to lose weight, but with golo, it wasn't. the weight just fell off. i have people come up to me all the time and ask me, "does it really work?" and all i have to say is, "here i am. it works." my advice for everyone is to go with golo. it will release your fat and it will release you.

good evening. on martha's vineyard tonight, residents are providing food and shelter to migrants. human beings who, whatever you think of the move, have become political pawns in what is now an escalating series of actions. the effect, and likely the goal, it's the thrust immigration further into the spotlight, less than eight weeks before election day. i'm john berman in for anderson. and this is the scene on martha's vineyard today, after an estimated 50 migrants arrived on the massachusetts island. they were sent there in two planes chartered by the administration of republican florida governor, ron desantis. though we are getting some information that the migrant