with with judge cannon was, hey maybe they are not classified or maybe a declassified them. what people were saying at the time including me don was this is not like liberal versus conservative, this is just right versus wrong. there was a judge who showed up today, judge dearie and he said it's judging, there is a side it hasn't evidence and here's a side that has nine who wins? young he made it clear that they're not gonna be able to sort of speculate they're gonna have to come through with proof if they can. maybe they will be able to keep the documents up in the air for a while. i think it's pretty clear that the reason they haven't been advancing or actually saying in court that they are declassified, because he didn't really, and there are consequences in court for lying if he doesn't have when he talked to hugh hewitt. that's what the next few days will reveal.

>> so i asked nick akerman in the last hour have trump boxed himself in by making that claim, or least his representatives speaking on television. look you can't have your cake and eat it. that's how the special master responded to teen trump harry. his excuse for not handing over that evidence. this is candidate trump's lawyers, that's what they put forward, so how do you think that is sitting with the former president? >> you know, the former president has wanted to say this in the public sphere. he hasn't wanted to say it in court where you make a false statement, that's a separate crime. i think he is as always completely brazen and indifferent about saying any old thing when he's talking on the hustings, but not in court. look, the courts overall have done a pretty good job all the way through. it takes a while to get to them, they're not perfect but most of the time you really gotta come

with the goods or lose. and that's what happened today. a conservative reagan appointee but a solid judge just said, i'm a judge, one side has evidence, one side doesn't, there's nothing more i need to know. so you come up with evidence team trump or that's the end of these supposition's in court. thanks for standing by so patiently. i want you to check out what trump said on hugh hewitt show. here it is just watch this. >> did you take those papers down there after declassifying them intentionally or did you have any idea they were there? >> remember this, remember this. everything was declassified. >> if trump did declassify these documents as he is claiming. wouldn't there be evidence of that? >> thanks don. to understand declassification and why the trump team's been flat with judge dearie, he is

certainly seen enough classified material and it's time. you can look at the websites for previously declassified documents. there's examples of the cia report that saudi arabia was responsible for killing khashoggi. that was produced as an unclassified report. so it was sterilized if you will, or planets classified declassified in the agency before was released. these are documents that were classified. they go through a process even if the prompt president did want to declassify them, or you would see parts of it still blacked out and. he would certainly see the classifications blacked out. because the agencies it only information, they have an obligation to go through that and protect what they have and also know what they no longer need to protect. there's no evidence of that there. at least in the photographs that we saw that he had provided. >> so dog, can't the special master send these documents

back to whatever document they came from and ask if they are classified or not and how long do you think that could possibly take if he indeed would take that step? >> well there would certainly be a paper trail. there's a number and attached to every report. but i think the judges point is correct. the evidence is the documents themselves. there's no changes, no corrections, nothing done to redact any information to point out that they be declassified. but indeed, there would be a paper trail because all those reports would have to be recalled by whoever issued those reports. and they would be available to any american citizen, to anyone really, because they are now open information. and were they declassified, where their efforts that they still need to be protected, the declassification process as sort of an impact state. what do we need to do to make sure we can declassify this but not put someone in danger or endanger some some entity. >> so harry, if you were

trump's lawyers, aren't you -- well this is like checkmate? >> time to fold on this. >> okay because it seems like the evidence is not, there it would be checkmate now what? >> i think in short order and he hasn't been open about his order that is derek. but in short order or either through him or the 11th circuit which could be acting as soon as friday. we talked about this last week. those hundred classified documents and everybody agrees that they are classified, trump has no interest in the middle, they're gonna go back to doj. i think in fairly short order. >> 103 classified documents. they determined to keep them away from everyone, so that's the material you are talking about. finish your thought. go on. >> so that's what they wanted

the most. they're gonna be able to use them, because they were also worried that if they use them they could and up in trouble down the line based on a ruling she could make. their number one goal is going to be achieved and in short order. and we have these 11,000 other documents. we have the whole bramblebush executive privilege. it's not gone away yet and we'll see what they do in the 11th circuit. but the thing they wanted most, the thing that she didn't do in the second ruling which everyone including when we talk last week said was a complete abomination, that's going to get reversed effectively by him or the 11th circuit or both within a matter of less than a week. >> so doug, do you have a reaction? prosecutors are suggesting that they may go all the way to the supreme court if they lose. >> there are serious consequences of the former president has been acting with

declassified documents and sharing themselves or in conversations with us. there needs to be an ongoing damaged assessment which is counter intelligence review which has to go hand in hand with the investigation to see who in the presidents circle, former president, not the president himself has been talking about this information. you saw judge dearie quite clearly pointing out that even he doesn't think in clear instances he could see all the documents because there are different colors of classification. it's not just top secret and secret, there's also the very sensitive compartments to go into some of those privileged, unique and highly protected information. >> and this is a special master? >> this is a special master. so if he's saying i'm obligated to work with justice before i take a look at it, what does that say for the former president and his team of lawyers we really really don't know who they're talking to? >> so if you're his lawyer i was gonna ask harry, how are you advising him right now?

what are you telling trump? doug? >> i'm telling trump that you have to be careful to have an already purge of yourself. think as a judge pointed out, there is no evidence meaning the president pardons anybody, and he's signed somebody. without that, i think i'm. no lawyer, but i know the danger has already occurred, the consequences are already out there just based on his behavior and the lack of control over the information is of the greatest in security. >> our revising in if you are his attorney harry? >> his attorney. fold. checkmate just as you said. we are last in this point. trying to make other ones and try to keep delaying things, gum up the works. your attempt to eat your cake and eat it too that's finished. by the way, so on 100 classified documents, that judge dearie might even give

them back without even looking at in them. he's got proof from an affidavit that they are classified, he doesn't even want to see them if he can avoid it. this is quintessential stuff for the executive branch, not for judges to be mocking about in. >> okay, so listen. there is this thing with the states concerning the 11th circuit. 11 republican led states have now filed a brief in the 11th circuit in support of trump's bid to pause the doj investigation. does that send a message politically hiring? what does that mean here? does that have any legal weight? >> not really, the legal weight is whatever persuasive argument, and there aren't any. it's only a political document, it's polemical, it tries to say that the biden justice department is completely corrupt therefore you have to do special things. it really is just in objective terms a political document with

really no legal argument at all. i don't think it'll have any impact on the 11th circuit, notwithstanding. the 11th circuit, this is right or wrong, thing not a liberal conservative thing. >> this is part of them coming up the works? >> yeah. >> a okay. so doug, will the doj is dealing with these document, this court fight, this classified document, is there anything the intelligence committee can do to protect our assets, deal within nation security implications of this potential breach? >> well, that's gonna be part of the counterintelligence review, and that has to be ongoing regardless because of the nature the self-defense to protect ourselves, our secrets and our sources. clearly there has to be a determination based on looking at timelines from the time the former president left office to the time these documents were clearly recognized as being out of control, out of secure compartmented areas. had there been any inconsistencies, any anomalies

are gonna collection, has it been any change in the collection of our unit sources, as where there been any change in the process of our enemies, to determine if something went wrong and when it went wrong. as you suggested, we take the corrective course. it could mean exfiltrating ex agents, deep behind enemy territory, which comes at a great risk for shutting down programs because we're being fed bogus information by arrival who's already compromised a certain capability we had based on the loss of control of these documents. >> wow! also tonight harry, the january six committee officially announcing they're gonna hold another public hearing next week. member zoe lofgren saying they're getting a lot of information and following the money. where do you see all of this heading? do you have any idea? >> well look, time is ticking on them. they are gonna shortly after this in october to provisional report and a final one in december, and then cheney is, it kinzinger is out.

i think they're not certain themselves, and they're having discussion and debate from within. they do a whole new theme, follow the money, the pack or do they try to, i've got a whole new information about the secret service et cetera. i think they haven't figured out yet, so god knows i haven't. >> doug i want to get your reaction there is this new surveillance team by showing a county official in georgia and operatives working with the trump attorney. they spent hours inside a restrictive area of a local elections office on the day that voting systems were breached. there was so much to unpack here. have you got some concerns? >> i'm looking at targeting -- we've seen coming out of a lot of the investigations and reporting, the key objectives of arrivals and adversaries are simply to sow seeds of chaos, take away the trust we have in our institutions. they've got real opportunities

here to target people and they can facilitate people to do just that. people have common cause. their weakness -- but advancing particular personality, or particular personal agenda. so i am sure that as the investigations are going on, and they will all become public on individuals and people and contacts and who are operating, they certainly have the russians, the chinese, the iranians, go through a list of our adversaries, trying to identify potential recruits. people they could go to under a false flag, to approach them to get their cooperation to provide them the means to further cause the sort of instability to further the chaos and to further the division that's creating this toxic environment. >> thank you, harry thank you doug, i appreciated. enjoy the conversation. republicans have been saying

abortion is really about states rights. so as lindsey graham suddenly singing a different tune? a ♪ ♪ "shake your thang" by salt n pepa (vo) a thin painted line. the only thing between you and a life-changing accident. but are these lines engh? a subaru with eyesight... id vo) hey dad! (vo) ...watches the lines for any danger... and can automatically stop itself. (mom) is everyone ok? (kid) i'm ok. (vo) your family is safer in a three-row subaru ascent. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire

we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds we'll come to you pay you on the spot then pick up your car that's it at carvana

bother the bugs... gotcha. ...not your family. zevo is made with essential oils which attack bugs' biological systems. it gets rid of the bugs plus is safe for use around people and pets. zevo. people-friendly. bug-deadly.

so senator lindsey graham defending his controversial national abortion ban during an interview on fox today let's listen. >> this is not a states rights issue this is a human right issue. i'm not gonna sit on the sidelines in washington d.c. until the pro-life community washington is closed for business. for more and bring in cnn political commoner martin huber, kirsten powers, and cnn political commentator alice stewart. good evening one at all. alice, i'm gonna start with you. what graham is pushing goes far

against what dobbs and republicans have been saying is that abortion should be left up to the states. is he revealing about what republican lawmakers want to do? >> no doubt, he's revealing the truth about what he wants to do. he wants to put democrats on record as holding very extreme views on abortion. the problem is he's also putting republicans on defence in this issue. look, we have been fighting and advocating to overturn roe v. wade for decades, and now that we have done so, we have spiked the football and we can't move the goalposts. that's what exactly what he's trying to do. we have been fighting to take this abortion issue out of nine elected justices and put it in the hands of elected officials at the state level, which is where it should be, and where it should remain. and for lindsey graham to come now and say let's go back and federalize this goes against what we have been fighting for. look, there are consequences for this. we have seen already that some

states are putting abortion back in place and these are the consequences. what we have been fighting for is that this stays at the state level where it's best decided by the people. >> so graham sounded a lot different in june kyrsten. listening. this >> the rest of us in the conservative world have believed that there's nothing in the constitution giving the federal government the right to regulate abortion. >> so he made it clear then that this was all about states rights. so what changed? >> he made it clear in multiple other appearances where he said that it should be handled by the states. now he's coming out with this new rationale that he's decided this is a quote unquote where human rights issue and therefore i guess it's okay that he changes his position even though he didn't change his position according to him. i think what he's not realizing here is that women are humans, they are humans with human

rights and that's not a factor in his bill. he is completely ignoring the reality of pregnancy for women, the reality of the fact that after 15 weeks is when a women will find out whether the pregnancy is either viable, but other severe fetal abnormalities. the exceptions are difficult when. they put up roadblocks with a lot of bureaucratic hoops to jump through and put people at a very vulnerable point. and makes them even more vulnerable. >> what do you think? >> what this reveals and lindsey graham's changing position actually reveals the many schism's and factions in modern american conservative movement. lindsey graham as just said two things that are contradictory. they are contradictory from his

position, but they have represented different factors of long been part of the conservative movement. there's been part of the conservative movement the dean deeply conservative and from the beginning when roe v. wade was made into law, they wanted to overturn it because they believe that all unborn life should be protected at the federal level. that's a position that lindsey graham is supporting out, not what he supported before. then there are other conservatives like alice's position, she very articulately mentioned, which is what we believe in life, but we believe it should be a states rights issues, and we believe it was decided based on terrible reasoning and an invented light to privacy in the constitution. this is badgers prudence, for that reason we will overturn it and let federalism be the argument. so you are just seeing the schism in the conservative movement played out and one map. >> but then there is a political part of it where it could be detrimental to republicans in midterms. >> and there's a pragmatic

politician which you get from mitch mcconnell, which he says no no no we get back to federalism. and basically they have decided that the argument they would put forward the american public for the overturn of roe v. wade, is a federalism argument. because they can all agree on that as a messaging point, even though they had different reasons for arriving at that strategy. >> is it logical to say that yes this is a states right, we believe believe in the sanctity of life. kirsten you see wrangling with? >> i totally do. >> and let the states decide that it's okay then, whatever the states decide, it is okay -- >> it doesn't make sense and the conservative movement as never agreed. >> i don't think it makes sense and i don't think that if the republicans were in control of the government, in control of congress and the white house, that most of them would decide they would want to oppose this on the states that don't have these restrictive abortion laws

right now. what we are seeing in red states, we're seeing them coming up a very restrictive abortion law has not can be happening in the blue states. there's a tiny part of me thinks that republicans were in control of government, they would not come around and do exactly what lindsey graham is doing, and probably a lot worse. >> i think what's important for people to keep in mind that two things can be true at the same time. it can be one hunted percent pro-life and support the sanctity of life, and also be rational enough to realize that you have to modify your views someone if you want any type of pro-life language and laws implemented at the state level, if we are so dramatic and so far to the right on this issue whether are no exceptions a very early term bands and we're not gonna get anything done. i think the more people can hold true to their views and values on this but also recognize we need to have exceptions for rape, incest and life of the mother, that's a more pragmatic way to move

forward. >> but it still doesn't address the states rights as part of it. >> i'm talking about at the state level. i'm talking about state legislators making these types of laws at the state level. nothing at the federal level, i'm talking at the state level. >> listen, last month's gop congresswoman betsy mayes said that abortion would be an issue for republicans in november if they didn't moderate their stance, but then she said this today listen. >> roe v. wade is extreme. it is not where the rest of the country's, and in fact under obama's administration, the democrats had an opportunity to codify roe v. wade and decided not to. so this hysteria over roe v. wade is completely manufactured. >> we were just talking about kansas let's take a deeper in. kansas, voters rejected a measure that would've allowed lawmakers to ban abortions there. new york, democrat pat ryan

took abortion anger into a surprise win for a seat in congress. is that anger literally manufactured margaret? >> no it's not. here's the thing it's, not so clear than in red states they would necessarily be passing these restrictive and horrific abortion laws. certainly in sunday, our and his son there trying to, look at louisiana. but in another red state kansas, registered sweeping numbers of new voters overturned serious restrictions and codified roe's protections for arborescent. really a surprising outcome just weeks after the dobbs decision was handed down. this is, make no mistake a polarizing issue that is galvanized support of democrats and moderate republicans. there are some pro-choice republicans left and it would has blunted what would've been the historical winds that would've swept republicans into the house in the senate. what it has done is blunted the

inertia and momentum that republicans had in their side. i think it's a game-changer for the center. i don't think it'll change the house that's my prediction. >> but margaret, i think the point you just brought up was really important because you're talking about what the voters did right? i think that's the point i was trying to make. i think the leaders in the republican party, i think they are out of step even with a lot of their own voters. so when it was put to the voters, then we saw one reaction, but when it is been left to the people who are legislating, we have seen a completely different reaction, and i think we see this and a lot of places in the republican party frankly where they are out of step with what the voters believe. but i think particularly on abortion there seems to be a real disconnect and i could see if they were in control of the federal government i could see that going ahead and doing it just to appease a wing of the

party. >> you're absolutely right and it is evidence of the special interest group that has a chokehold on the base of the republican party. you see it not only in the issue of abortion that are many other issues kirsten to your point. i think that's really estates. >> listen arizona could soon join the states with the most restrictive bans. a judge just swirled whether a 1901 ban on all abortions could be enforced. arizona is a swing state that president biden won by fewer than 11,000 votes. is this -- if this ban happens, what do you think the political impact is alice? >> this will be very impactful based on what we have already seen as we just pointed out in kansas and new york. when abortion is front and center and the issue that people are talking about, it has shown to be a motivating factor for democrats, many women and moderate republicans. so at this is going to be a huge issue in arizona, this is

going to drive people to the polls that are not specifically voting for republicans, which is all the more reason why makes absolutely no sense that lindsey graham brought up this measure at this point because now everybody is talking about abortion, when republicans want and need to focus to be on the economy, inflation and crime. that's what we should be talking about. that is what is helpful for republicans and not talking about abortion. >> i gotta run. but margaret, are republicans going lindsey no! >> you bet you bet. ask mark hallie. he saying line lindsey, keep going. >> thanks al icreate. >> devastating puerto rico where majority the roughly 3.1 million residents have no power. the storm is expected to intensify to a category four hurricane tomorrow. we're gonna tell you where it's headed. that's next. and that your new car ought to comome with newfound happiness and zero surprises. and all of us will stop at nothing to drive you happy.

we'll drive you happy at carvana. ♪ hey, sorry i missed your game. it's okay. you see that? that's when i realized it's time to finally do the thing we've been talking about for years.

so we're making plans for right now. ♪ careful. ♪ you know, opera isn't so bad. do you like it? start your plan today with a northwestern mutual financial advisor and spend your life living. ♪ only on prime video. the steelers. the browns. our hopes and dreams out on this field right here. how does he do it time after time? an afc showdown. it's the steel city and the dawg pound. they gon' need the whole bench to tackle me! a rivalry renewed. thursday night football. only on prime video. in 2 seconds, a vacationer will say... yeah, i'm going to live here. only to realize... what if i can't sell my place? don't worry. sell it directly to opendoor and we'll help you buy your next one. aww. get your free offer at opendoor.com

hurricane fiona carving a path of devastation across the caribbean now intensifying to a category three hurricane, slamming into turks and caicos as it pushes north. it could reach category four strength. that is rain is still falling on an already battered puerto rico, or cnn's little santiago 1 million people still without power. >> hurricane fiona wiping a power to the majority of the roughly 3.1 million residents here, 60% of them without water, and about 1200 people housed in shelters. five years ago today puerto rico was ravaged by hurricane maria. now barely recovered from that catastrophic storm, the island

and its people are suffering again. officials say at least two have died on the island as a result of the storm. one man swept away by floating river behind his home. another man died while trying to fill his generator with gasoline setting on fire. and this morning we traveled with the national guard as a try to clear roads in the mountainous region of calle. their goal, access. and a start moving in much needed supplies to these isolated areas. >> in the islands interior like i, am very mountainous municipality this is the problem. the mud slides that blocked the road and block access to that power substation. >> hector rivera santiago was cracked-ing drinking water on the mountainside. >> so he came to the mountainside to get water because there's no water at his house. >> we know that we are going to face that and we can deal with that but our biggest concern is we got water we can't live without water. >> she lives behind a mudslide

that blocked access to the road. the national guard had to evacuate about 35 elderly stations before the mudslide demolished the building. >> we carry the hourly, the chairs and their beds, we just ran over and carried them over, so we could get them out before their house collapsed for the landslide. >> not without its own set of challenges. >> a hurricane and now the storm, the related storm has impacted the whole island, so we are still in the middle of this event. we are basically responding at this point. the next step will be recovery, we are not there yet. >> and also tonight in calle don, here at a gas station where there are lines forming. people coming down to get gas, get diesel, to power those generators they need in order to be able to turn on their lights in their home. in terms of when power can be expected to be restored, the governor says today that by

tomorrow night he expects a good chunk of the island should have power restored with one exception. the southern part which is the most impacted part of the island done. >> leyla santiago thank you very much. vladimir putin saying today his forces saying quote need weapons of destruction, but that could mean for the ongoing conflict in ukraine. that's next. she was supposed to be the one. i used to believe in the one. and then i realized, there's plenty of savings in the sea. what? amazon has daily deals, so every day is a chance

to meet the deal that catches your eye, that shakes your soul, that changes your destiny. i'm gonna go check on those tater tots. learn all the ways to save with amazon.

music: “walking on the moon” cover by ruelle ♪ ♪

kevin: i've fought wildfires for twenty years. here's the reality we face every day. this is a crisis. we need more firefighters, more equipment, better forest management to prevent wildfires and reduce toxic smoke. and we need to reduce the tailpipe emissions that are driving changes to our climate. that's why cal fire firefighters, the american lung association, and the california democratic party support prop 30. prevent fires. cut emissions. and cleaner air. yes on 30. new tonight we are learning

that russia is not expected to attend the un security council meeting on ukraine. that is some russian occupied parts of ukraine are pushing for local authorities to hold referenda on joining russia. meanwhile the russian government is challenging their laws, now making violation of military service such as desertion and evasion from service a crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison. and today vladimir putin is saying that his forces need quote weapons of destruction as soon as possible. this all as the world awaits possible address from putin. it's unclear what will be discussed. joining me now cnn nationally's national security analyst evil. thanks for joining us steve. russia taking a lot of drastic measures. putin appearing the rhetoric, and it's all coming in the middle of this fierce ukraine

counteroffensive. i want to listen to what the secretary state said today. >> we see's putin talking about mobilizing more people in his country. we see him putting forward these sham referenda in some of the regions of ukraine, a sham referendum that he thinks he's gonna conduct in three days. all of this is desperation by vladimir putin and he is on the ropes. it is of course increases our concern that he will use kinds of weapons of war that he should not. >> she said russia's on the. ropes is rush on the rope steve? >> you know don, i think to understand what prudence situation is and whether he's on the ropes, you have to understand worry things are with him right now. you start with the obvious, ukraine. to state the obvious, things are not going well in ukraine. we all remember in february, we

were saying how long the ukrainians gonna hang out? now we're saying is it not only possible that they can not only win the war but perhaps take back crimea. so ukraine's first and foremost. but also look at what's been happening to putin's friends outside of russia. when he left with chinese leader xi the other day, he had a talking to behind closed doors, much left behind closed us when he met with the indian leader modi who gave him a firm lag of the finger, and it looked like he was sitting in the principles office. the last thing i think we have to focus on in time trying to figure out and what potent could do know where he stands, this is a little strange, but in these frozen conflicts, a lot of people forgotten about them, the soviet union sent in troops at the end of the soviet era to places like armenia and azerbaijan. and he just went at it again in a local war. normally the russians would've stepped in to stop. but they are tied into ukraine right now, and people are

feeling the ropes. those frozen conflicts are starting to unfreeze. yeah, they are on the ropes and it's not looking good. >> one to ask you specifically about these referenda in donetsk and lugansk. you say it won't solve prudence problems why not? >> it won't solve his problems because at the end of the day is not really gonna change anything. so it's not as though the ukrainians are going to do, okay so in the donbas these people have decided that they want to have their own referendum they want to join russia and russia has agreed to annex another part of ukraine. so we're just gonna sit back and let that happen. no way as ukraine's gonna sit back and let that happen. they're gonna push in and try to exert military control. putin in the recent past and said well wait a second, that would be attacking russia. that's kind of moving the goalposts. it doesn't count if you annex a place in that call yours and say it's off limits. the ukrainians are gonna have none of that and they're gonna

probably have some significant success. >> putin is saying that russia needs quote weapons of destruction as soon as possible. would you think that means weapons of destruction. he didn't say weapons of mass destruction, he said weapons of destruction. when you think that means? >> he sings some very strange stuff that's one strange thing to say. another strange thing to do is to go to north korea and say, hey can you give us some ammo? that's from a blunted russian military and you've got to get your drones from iran. it doesn't look like a very blunted military. it's not just a military, it's all over russia that seems on the brink of fraying. i think you have to think of russia as a ship. putin is the captain of the ship but there are a lot of really other important people on the ship. people who run the place and who are close to putin and work under his auspices. but if the ship starts to take on water and it looks like it's going to, and it starts to sink, these people of the security services, the heads of police,

they're not gonna sit back and say boys too bad we have this guy's captain, and the ships gonna go down. they're gonna do something about it. they're gonna try to change the captain. i think that's what putin is facing right now on why he's saying some things. steve all >> steve all thanks very much. pushing teachers in california out of their homes. so where they go? i will tell you. up next.

your record label is taking off. but so is your sound engineer. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire psoriatic arthritis, made my joints stiff, swollen, painful. emerge tremfyant®. tremfya® is approved to help reduce joint symptoms in adults with active psoriatic arthritis. some patients even felt less fatigued. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge tremfyant® with tremfya®.

ask you doctor about tremfya® today. my mental health was much better. my mind was in a good place. but my body was telling a different story. i felt all people saw were my uncontrolled movements. some mental health meds can cause tardive dyskinesia, or td, and it's unlikely to improve without treatment. ingrezza is a prescription medicine to treat adults with td movements in the face and body. it's the only treatment for td that's one pill, once-daily, with or without food. ingrezza 80 mg is proven to reduce td movements in 7 out of 10 people. people taking ingrezza can stay on their current dose of most mental health meds. don't take ingrezza if you're allergic to any of its ingredients. ingrezza may cause serious side effects including sleepiness.

don't drive, operate heavy machinery, or do other dangerous activities until you know how ingrezza affects you. other serious side effects include potential heart rhythm problems and abnormal movements. it's nice people focus more on me. ask your doctor about ingrezza, #1 prescribed for td. learn how you could pay as little as zero dollars at ingrezza.com.

across the country teachers are in short supply or under pressure as they deal with soaring inflation and rents. many can't afford to live where they work. cnn's dana cole reports from los angeles why educators are being pushed to the brink. >> for scenic at whiton, this

is a struggle the pull starts before the sun is up. single mom living in los angeles battling debilitating ms. >> right here in the vip section. >> and yet still determined to get to work on time. she let us tag along. on the drive telling us about her journey. >> i would worry about a megaton afford rent this week month. >> she's worked 20 years in special education always for the l.a. school system but rising rents in a surging -- have forced her and many other school employees out. >> it's because of inflation and everything is going from paycheck to paycheck. >> it's a common burden felt by teachers and other school employees nationwide. on average, grandson early doubled in the past ten years. cost of living increasing at

nearly six times it was a decade ago. to retain teaching talent, school systems are doubling both as employers and landlords. for mountainous eagle valley in colorado to maui, school districts are finding affordable housing for staff. but construction is all often years off, leaving some school districts like milpitas and san jose to act urgently, asking parents in this message to step forward if they have a room for rent. some 66 people are already offering that rooms to educators. also in silicon valley, this former convent no longer for nuns, now used his teacher housing. national education association supports these type of measures. affordable housing and more pay for teachers. back at northward learning in l.a., where shannika lives, the need is now. the demand >> that demand for these apartments is soaring. this property has 29 units

altogether, nearly 600 people are on a waitlist hoping just one of them opens up. most of those individuals work for the school system. >> she unique is really great. that's what that. means >> sam chang manages the facility elizabeth here with his wife. a teacher and their kids. >> when you hand over the keys, what's the reaction? >> normally it's a very positive choice, momentous type of reaction. a lot of people, they almost feel in disbelief because not only the price that they're getting the unit for but the quality of the housing here. >> in a county weren't average rent for a three bedroom is $3,000 a month, shannika's paying less than half that and feels like one of the lucky ones. >> living where i, and paying what i pay, it's a blessing, it's a blessing. >> don, teachers here in los angeles talk with the salary around $56,000 a year. that puts them in this different difficult milligram. they earn too much to qualify

for california's affordable housing but not enough to cover comfortable, convenient housing. it has left school systems desperately trying to find creative ways to maintain a dwindling workforce. don? >> data thank you and thanks for watching. our coverage continueses. pupurchases on your discover card.

we're carvana we created a brand new way for you to sell your car go to carvana answer a few questions and our techno wizardry calculates your car's value and gives you a real offer in seconds we'll come to you pay you on the spot then pick up your car that's it at carvana

good evening tonight what happens now good evening, tonight what happens now that lawyers for the former president and senior wishes fulfilled to think it might be more than what they bargained for. they wanted a court appointed special master to scrutinize documents taken from mar-a-lago. they wanted so badly the opening line and their filing

before juggling can read and i quoting now, politics ought not be allowed to impact administration justice. well they got a special master and the proposed scene judge raymond dearie for the job in they got him. and they got a review well past the midterm elections. today haven't gotten what they wanted they were called on to do something that notably not done in any court filing or any proceeding so far, mainly back up what their client and their allies have been saying that these documents were declassified. in so many words, prove it. the government today they signaled a willingness to take this all the way to the supreme court. there's a lot to get to tonight. cnn's jessica starts it off. she's been following developments and starts it off. let's talk more about what the trump legal team told the special master. >> what's interesting is their