with less than two weeks to go -- >> 13 days. >> i tell you it's 13 days,

people, till midterm elections, really two weeks from today we'll know a lot more. anyway i'll move on. the midterms are coming in 13 days and you've got mayors and law enforcement officials who are getting a new warning sadly about election intimidation. you've got extremists looking to disrupt midterms at the local level targeting voters, candidates, election workers according to axios. >> let's bring in our panel. cnn chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst john miller, new york democratic congressman jones and senior political analyst ron brownstein. when we think of extremism, i think we think in terms of january 6th , the insurrection, something on a national scale. locally there are all sorts of examples of people being intimidated and just awful things happening. here are a few examples coming from axios. in 50 out of 67 pennsylvania counties election chiefs have left because of threats, harassment and intimidation. in idaho protesters hung an

effigy at a republican candidate's home. a democratic candidate in eastern washington state was shot with a bb gun while putting up campaign signs. these are just a few examples. congressman, being in politics, i don't have to tell you is a real blood sport now and it's really scary what's happening before the midterms. >> it is. we see most of the political violence aimed by the right wing towards liberal or progressive members of congress and, of course, at the state and local level. this is not the first set of examples of this. we saw pramila jayapal nearly harmed by someone outside her home waving a gun around. we saw what happened january 6th and so many examples in between and this is something especially in the context of elections that is part of a strategy by the gop to

intimidate in particular democratic leaning voters against casting -- exercising their constitutional right. >> but there are examples of republicans also being intimidated and harassed. >> i would like to hear more about that. at this point i think there's only one major political party that's pro democracy and trying to have safe and secure elections. >> the impact of this is not a theoretical and esoteric debate. you hear about democracy in peril as an over arching theme. we're talking about election offices now having bulletproof glass. they are having active shooter training, recognition of this, people leaving saying look, this is not worth it. the idea of thinking about it's not worth it to man these election booths or election workers for those reasons. you even have chief ramsay who was adviser to the conference of mayors saying look, i suggest you prioritize your 911 calls to the election booths on these days knowing what crime is like right now. this is what we're after.

>> this is not the same country it was six years ago when donald trump -- seven years ago when donald trump came down the escalator. there are isolated examples of conservative politicians being targeted by liberal critics, but as a mass phenomenon we are talking about the manifestation of election denialism in the republican party being operationalized in a lot of different ways, laws making it tougher to vote and now we're seeing it in this systemic harassment that is developing. the images of those men in tactical gear with automatic weapons surveilling a drop box questioning voters as they exercise their constitutional rights is a symbol of where this is potentially going unless law enforcement and prosecutors at all levels can make a really strong statement. we are talking two-thirds to three-quarters of republican voters say they believe the 2020 election was stolen, joe

biden is an illegitimate president. that is tens of millions of people. 55% of republican voters consistently say in polls the traditional way of american life is disappearing so fast we may have to use force to save it. that is tens of millions of people. only a small fraction of them may act on those sentiments in an inappropriate way, but that is still a large number of people and unless the signals become more clear, the kinds of threats you're talking about will become more routine in our political life than we've seen in any point since probably reconstruction. >> john, the point is, though, law enforcement has a role to play, right? if there is a threat, if crime obviously is on the rise in many places, but if there is a real and clear and present danger on election day, what's being done to prepare for it? >> well, i think first you're seeing threat reporting. one of the things we did not see and we talked about that at this table one night not long ago before january 6th was a

threat assessment for january 6th for the certification of the vote despite all the intel that was coming in that there was going to be large crowds, armed crowds, militias, white supremacists. you'll see a threat assessment for election day, probably a joint cop from the fbi. we're already seeing a heightened threat reporting now. second thing is you'll see cooperation with law enforcement and police departments. this is not your father's election or even our election from not that long ago, you know. we used to have this system where we'd count the votes up overnight and you'd wake up in the morning and find out who won. the new system and in isn't a secret operation, this is where steve bannon went on his podcast with dan schultz and they laid this out. you have to separate a couple things here which is get jobs

as poll watchers. set up, videotape everything, collect and keep those tapes even if it doesn't look like something. if we don't like the result, we can pull out all the tapes and say we have tapes. get jobs better, not as poll watchers but poll workers because you have more power, more access, more things you can do to step in or interfere or move things. focusing on elections for things like district attorneys and secretaries of states. >> right. and they're doing. that it's all happening as you say. steve bannon laid out the playbook and there's nothing law enforcement can do about those things. it's certainly not poll watchers. >> how about congress? >> look at those places where they're sitting in states with open carry laws where the poll watchers are watching with weapons. that's intimidating. >> i turn to we have a member of congress here and the idea of what january 6th was intended to do, which is in part to look into what led up to and your point is well taken. the idea the potential to

repeat and maybe even go beyond some things we saw, is this just our local law enforcement to do something about this? >> no, it's not. there was a bill called the freedom to vote john r. lewis act, which i was proud to coauthor that passed the house, but because of kyrsten sinema and joe manchin and unanimous opposition from the gop did not pass. one of the provisions in that that's not talked about nearly as much as others is that it would criminalize the intimidation of poll workers and create a private right of action for those poll workers to then sue in court in addition to empowering the attorney general of the united states to combat the misinformation or disinformation that oftentimes motivates the intimidation that we are seeing. i want to add something to what john said earlier. this didn't just start because of an increase in voting by mail. if there had been only in- person voting in connection with the 2020 presidential election, my republican

colleagues and the standard bearer of the republican donald trump would still be pushing the big lie that has oftentimes led to the incidents you were talking about. >> if we start to think of january 6th as a dry run, it feels as though, congressman, as you've outlined, we haven't put in the guardrails to fix it for the midterms or for the next presidential race. that's what we could have spent the past two years doing, but it sounds like we've not done that. >> it's one of the things that people have been working on. there is an attempt to reform the electoral counting. >> yes. i keep hearing about the electoral count act, but that won't fix all this stuff. >> you mean short term versus long term? >> yeah. >> you can't address all behavior through legislation. that's why it's so important to have real leadership in congress and in other elected offices and on television and we are not seeing that from one side of the political spectrum. >> right. you could have had the provisions in hr1 the

congressman was talking about. jon ossoff worked on that about protecting election workers. you can have all sorts of safeguards in the electoral count act, but as long as you have a huge number of people who have been convinced that this election was stolen and when you don't have a clear statement from the leaders of that party that, a, the election wasn't stolen and, b, the use of violence to advance political goals is always wrong, i remember talking to elizabeth newman who was assistant secretary for these kind of threats at dhs under donald trump who said the most important thing in turning off this cycle of violence are clear messages from the political leaders of the movement saying it is unacceptable and when you have trump talking about the january 6th , the people in jail essentially as political prisoners or other republicans minimizing what happened that day, that is the opposite

message. law enforcement and even legislation is not going to be able to turn back this dial without a clear unequivocal message and we are just not getting that. >> have you guys heard about this constitutional sheriffs movement? it's a fringe group that believes local sheriffs have absolute power over elections and i put it under the category of election vigilantism like what we're seeing in places like mesa, arizona, and beyond. are you concerned because as ron's talking about, the idea of a leader being able to shut it off, for some people we might be beyond the idea of turning that switch, flipping that switch, particularly in vigilantism. what are the concerns you have about that? >> we are in the most brittle political time in america in a couple generations, but sheriffs are unique in law enforcement in america because they are elected which usually means they are a member of one party or another and sometimes county to county this sheriff will be republican and that one will be democrat, but they're also the chief law enforcement

officer of that county. the more rural you get, the more the sheriff is the police as opposed to small police departments with a county sheriff. so that's one concern. the sheriffs are already in politics to get their jobs and the expectation is that once you're elected sheriff, politics goes aside and you go by your oath to enforce the law. this is going to be uncomfortable with this constitutional sheriffs business and we'll have it to watch that closely. i'll tell you the other dirty little secret is cops hate election day because when people start fighting at the polls, you were too close, you broke the rules, you did this, no matter which way the officer who is on the scene goes they're either going to say well, you're secretly a trumpee or you're a tool of the government or you're -- so it's very uncomfortable for them, but i think in this election you'll see a lot of law

enforcement presence as a deterrent. >> thank you, gentlemen, frightening. >> it really is. and we're 13 days away. >> 13 days in october, as bobby kennedy once said. a wisconsin man was found guilty today of killing six people with an suv at a christmas parade last year. why is this somehow being used politically? there's an attack ad and a lot of it's being used to target mandela barnes who is running for senate from wisconsin and a larger issue about democrats on crime.

i'm jonathan lawson here to tell you about life insurance through the colonial penn program. if you're age 50 to 85, and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget, remember the three ps.

what are the three ps? the three ps of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, and a price that fits your budget. i'm 54, what's my price? you can get coverage for $9.95 a month. i'm 65 and take medications. what's my price? also $9.95 a month. i just turned 80, what's my price? $9.95 a month for you too. if you're age 50 to 85, call now about the #1 most popular whole life insurance plan available through the colonial penn program. it has an affordable rate starting at $9.95 a month. no medical exam, no health questions. your acceptance is guaranteed. and this plan has a guaranteed lifetime rate lock so your rate can never go up for any reason. so call now for free information

and you'll also get this free beneficiary planner. and it's yours free just for calling. so call now for free information. think again. this always ultra thin is our best yet. it wicks gushes 90% faster and absorbs even more. for up to 100% leak-free and odor-free comfort. this is triple protection from always. with a little help. and to support my family's immune health, i choose airborne. unlike some others, airborne gives you vitamin c and so much more. it's an 8 in 1 immune support formula. airborne. do more. why do nearly one million businesses choose stamps.com to mail and ship? stamps.com is convenient you get the services of the post office right on your computer stamps.com saves you money

with great rates from usps and ups mail letters ship packages anytime anywhere for less a lot less get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and get started today introducing the new sleep number climate360 smart bed. the only smart bed in the world that actively cools, warms and effortlessly responds to both of you. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. only from sleep number. the man who drove an suv

into the waukesha christmas parade was found guilty today of six counts of intentional homicide. 40-year-old darrell brooks now faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison, but the horrific waukesha attack has now also become a hammer for republicans trying to portray democratic senate nominee mandela barnes as weak on crime. >> when criminals are released because bail is set dangerously low. >> tragedy in waukesha, an suv plows through the city's christmas parade. >> six people were killed and dozens more injured. >> brooks was freed from jail on $1,000 bail. >> mandela barnes wants to end cash bail completely. he wrote the bill. barnes still wants to end cash bail today. mandela barnes, not just a democrat. >> every time i see the footage of that parade, i take my kids to the christmas parades all the times, unbelievable to see. the milwaukee d.a. said last year brooks was given low bail as a result of human

error. a 2021 cnn fact check has found bail reform is not clearly linked to a recent spike in crime. we're back now to discuss this with john miller, congressman mondare jones and ron brownstein. gentlemen, there is that saying there is the specific horror and tragedy of what happened at that parade. there's the larger issue as well regarding the way in this this notion of who is soft on crime plays around elections and has a very political, pointed perspective. i wonder for the voters, do they know who's right and how do you approach to try to bridge the gap between the talking point which feels very visceral and the facts? crickets? exactly. >> criminologists i think more than almost any branch of social science will say that it

is extremely difficult to explain the long term trends in why crime rises and falls and when you get down to specific cases like this, the causation and the scheme of events becomes more complex because you can make an argument i think that this case is, in fact, a good justification for moving away from cash bail. >> why? how does that work? >> because this person was -- under wisconsin law you are not allowed to consider the risk that a person poses to the community when setting bail. the only issue you're allowed to consider is whether they will show up. >> how does that make sense? >> it doesn't make sense. a d.a. set an obviously inappropriately low bail. >> $1,000. >> terrible. >> when the d.a. set the insanely low bail, $1,000, it was for assault, battery, resisting arrest and bail jumping. how do you set a low bail for a

person who just jumped bail? >> the reform that barnes proposed and which has been implemented in other places around the country would replace cash bail with a risk assessment system in which the risk to the community would explicitly be part of the decision before the judge on whether to let somebody out. there are voices on the left like the aclu that have opposed this change in some places because they think it will lead to more people remaining in jail if you move from a system that says we're going to keep you here unless you can afford to pay to one that says we are explicitly going to include the degree of risk that you pose in the decision whether to let you out. you can argue whether that's the right system or not, but it does -- in many ways its impact is the exact opposite of what the ad is suggesting. >> normally prosecutors consider that. we consider the idea of the risk to the community, flight

risk, all sorts of things. so it's interesting to think about the specifics of wisconsin being different on that notion. >> new york is barred from considering dangerousness. a judge in new york city has to consider what is the likelihood to return to court, but if you determine factually that the person is clearly a danger to the community, you are specifically prohibited by law. >> how does that make sense, congressman? >> it doesn't because it open pits something and that is under new york state law a judge, because of an amendment that kathy hochul presided over as governor, can now look at the seriousness of the harm of the crime for which the person was convicted. so that is a very important piece. a lot of folks don't understand the purpose of bail. you know as a former prosecutor the purpose of bail is not to prematurely adjudicate or determine someone's guilt or innocence before they have their day in court. the point of bail is to insure someone shows up again in court at the next court date.

>> right. but if somebody's a danger to the community, they shouldn't be out. >> i agree with that completely. >> i don't know how we got here. >> it's bail and bond conditions. these two things are corellaries. >> under new york state law and i don't purport to be an expert, but i do know a few things. one is the frequency of criminality is now taken into consideration as well as the seriousness for the harm for which a person has been convicted and that gets at the analysis you were talking about when you talk about sort of risk of doing public harm, but let's be clear. before cash bail reform in places like new york state and elsewhere, plenty of people guilty of crimes obtained freedom quite quickly because of their wealth. >> because they could pay. >> mostly white people. >> i'm sorry, could we get to

the dirty little secret here, the second one of tonight. number one, before criminal justice reform we had the lowest crime in recorded history in new york city, the lowest prison population in a generation and the fewest number of arrests. after criminal justice reform shootings doubled. murder went up by 38%. prison populations increased and here is the secret. >> can you be specific how you define reform just so the audience knows. >> it was so much more sweeping than just bail reform. it was a series of discovery law changes, bail reform, entire sets of charges that you were no longer allowed to arrest somebody. you could just give them a ticket. so this came in a package in the middle of the night stuck into a budget bill and passed, but here's the secret. prior to this when we had all that low crime and low prison populations, low jail populations both, 85% of people arrested by the new york city

police department went to arraignment and walked out of the courthouse either on a low bail they could afford or released on their own recognizance. so logic dictates that the judge looked at that 15% and said there's a reason this person needs to go in and everything was working and now they've removed any kind of judgment in that regard. >> meaning that 15% now is walking out you think. >> yeah. i mean to pick up on the congressman's point, if you look at places where they eliminated cash bail and things like that, they say 90% of the people return to court, which is true. that means 10% of them don't which means that's probably that same percentage that the judges were saying these guys are, a, probably not going to come back and, b, based on their records like our waukesha guy with his ten arrests and gun arrests and everything else, will probably be out committing crimes. >> i don't think it's fair to have just the pure cause and effect of criminal justice

reform means increase in crime. are. >> that's not what i'm saying. what i'm saying is criminal justice reform can't be just thrown together by a bunch of defense lawyers and civil rights advocates written into a bill and passed in the dark of night. criminal justice reform comes about when you say we're going to bring everybody to albany. i've got the judges, prosecutors, cops and the lawyers. we'll hash this out and come up with something that make sense. >> just because the prosecutors didn't agree with the final outcome didn't mean they weren't consulted. >> if that happened, i want to know where i was that day because that meeting never happened. >> they should have made sure to invite you. >> the fact as crime rates declined from the early '90s to 2014. they started going up in 2014 which was before almost any of these criminal justice reforms, 2014 is the pivot point. >> in new york city -- >> i'm talking about nationally

murder rates, violent crime rates, 2014 is the pivot point, started going up then. i don't think criminologists have an exact explanation why. in the most detailed study that came out recently done by seven criminologists, murder rates went up faster in the cities with hard line traditional prosecutors over the last five years than the rest of the prosecutors. that doesn't mean the regular prosecutors are reducing crime. there are so many factors that go into whether crime rises or falls that it is i think very difficult to pinpoint one and say, yes, this is the pivot driving things over. >> that would be the last place that i would go to however to deal with crime is a criminologist. they're fantastic at admiring the problem, but solutions never work. >> murders in manhattan had been down year to date 24%. shootings had been down in manhattan year to date 18% and that does not mean people don't

have a right to feel and to actually be safe in new york city. i think more of my progressive colleagues need to speak to and acknowledge that fear people feel. they feel it in my family and i know they feel it across the city and throughout this country, but i think it's a mistake to say that reforms that are meant to create a legal system that is more equitable and that reduces the racial disparities and discrimination and wealth disparities that we see when it comes to cash bail, in particular, is the cause or are the cause of the uptick in crime that we've seen throughout this country concentrated, frankly, in eight out of those ten states you just mentioned and states led by republican governors. >> couldn't agree more. reforms have to make sense. >> yeah. i think your argument is super compelling and i always appreciate when you make it because you've been on the front lines. so you saw it happen, but, of course, there's all sorts of factors as you guys point out.

thank you, gentlemen, very much. obviously we'll continue to have this conversation for the next 13 days. >> how long is it till the election? >> 13 days. now to something possibly a little lighter. >> which could be anything. >> if you're worried about your kids playing video games, a new study finds kids who play video games three or more hours a day may have better cognitive skills than kids who don't play them at all. the teens and tweens at home will be happy. go wake them up, tell them about this. we'll tell you about this study next. >> did your kids write this? >> sounds like it. >> first of all, i don't have to wake them up. they're up playing video games.

with new chapter multi-vitamin gummies, you get so much more than just... mmm. ... more nutrients. more research and more organic ingredients. you also get less sugar and that means less candy posing as vitamins. new chapter. that's wellness, well done.

for decades parents have worried about whether video games are rotting their kids' brains, but a new study finds gaming may actually help improve cognition and impulse control in kids. listen to this. it is the largest study of its kind. it looks at data from close to 2,000 kids age 9 and 10 and it found children who play games for more than three hours a day which i think is quite high had higher levels of activity in parts of the brain associated with attention and memory than those who did not play video games. here with us we have former obama white house senior director niara huff and former nfl receiver dante stallworth and rob brownstein is back with us. was this study commissioned by 12-year-old boys? >> conducted by 12-year-old boys. >> no. it was the national institutes of health and so i'm stunned

because i'm one of the parents who have been saying it rots your brain and stop it. i also think socially and for human interaction it's not good, but maybe it's better than i thought it was. >> i think games have changed over the years, too right? and it's important to separate the biology we know versus the cultural changes. we are all part of a generation where you have to work your thumbs, but the video games we grew up with were relatively violent and solo operations. in the pandemic we saw these younger boys having used the internet twitch land parties to be able to build these connections and maintain networks at a time when girls in junior high and high school were struggling because their social networks imploded. the challenge and i'm really curious about exactly what games were studied. is it something like minecraft that involves world building and deep thought and spacial organization or are these first person shooter games where boys are largely getting together

and often subjecting each other to racist and violent commentary along the way? >> very good point. >> i have a 9-year-old. i think he may have done the study. i gave him a 30 minute limit on his game. i really do. i'll tell you i wonder from the study whether this was self- selecting. the idea were people having higher cognitive responses that we were talking about in attention, memory and impulse control because they were already more prone to do so and were drawn to these games or was the game causing that? it goes back to cause and effect. by the way, i feel very validated as a mother today. >> because your son does play a lot. >> a lot of judgment from parents who say your kids watch television. yeah, because mommy's on it. you played video games. i played them all when i was a kid, not the violent ones. it's not the worst thing but competing studies between those who say no, it's hard, rots

your brain and now they're telling you go ahead. >> the more research we have, the more studies that come up. we'll find out more about what these do and especially long term in these kids. when we have all these different studies, i think it's really important to be open to these because you never know what types of cognitive skills these kids are learning at such a young age that can benefit them later down the road and in turn benefit society as well. >> here's where we as parents and my child is 6, so we're still being introduced to this idea. there's some violent action figures as well as daniel tiger. we're still in that universe. moving on and growing up as parents understanding, that is an entirely different universe. it is not the super nintendo plug it in, plug out. there is a life, a social existence, entire worlds they are building that as parents we do need to understand and have insight into. >> my kids are a little old ever, but when they were young, everybody was hopeful video games would make everyone a

fighter pilot, would have incredible hand/eye coordination and super quick reactions. so my reaction to this is more like video games are on one small slice of the inputs that shape the interests and aptitudes of kids. it is a significant part of their life. >> if they're playing it three hours a day, it is. >> i suspect it will neither be the salvation or the sinking of this generation any more than it was the last. >> about the only way you can be a top fighter pilot is to know where the movie comes from, the need for speed or top gun. i don't know what education the kids are having. i will say i had a parent/teacher conference and the statement was she was complaining about the math, the idea of new math. they use a lot of computer- based programs and they don't have instructions. it's the kids have to figure out for themselves what they're asked and what the next steps

are. i said how can that work? you have these programs. look at video games. kids are figuring those out with very little instructions. they're not like parents going through saying which is the controller? what's happening now? it is being repeated in a way as a second layer of how you understand even in these subject matters in school. >> as games become more about strategy and teamwork, we are actually finding there are more girl gamers than young boy gamers. we write that stereotype it's only young boys isn't proving true, but the challenges they face absolutely may reflect the challenges we face in society at large except they're facing them in a silo we aren't hearing and we don't have access to to help them process there at a younger age. >> i had forgotten it's not just a solitary experience anymore. as you said, during covid my son would be connecting with his cousin or friends and they'd be together playing

minecraft or whatever. >> large numbers of people watch other people playing video games. >> in a stadium play video games. >> some are getting college scholarships, by the way. some are getting a lot of money for these ideas. e-sports is a huge phenomenon. >> in 2020 there was a political organization that tried to advertise in some of the virtual spaces, in these kind of shared communities that young people were creating, and they tried to find ways to put in register to vote, go out to vote in there. >> the biden campaign was present in animal crossing. that was an active investment on their digital side. >> are you like why did i bother having to play football? why didn't i do this? >> yeah, seems like it. >> wouldn't have hurt as much. >> i was okay in madden. i think i did okay at the end. >> i know a lot about this because of ms. pacman and astroids. you guys have never even heard

of them, have you? >> you're my generation if you know how to end this, do, do, do, do, do, do. >> do. >> wow, that's impressive. >> i'm very touched. i'm a little emotional about that. it was wonderful. and election day is 13 days away. >> 13. >> don't forget to go to the polls. don't forget your shopping list. we'll talk all about election day comfort foods. >> it's a real thing. there's actually election day food. we'll tell you about it. and now get relief without a pill with tylenol dissolve packs. relief without the water. i'm jonathan lawson here to tell you about life insurance through the colonial penn program. if you're age 50 to 85, and looking to buy life insurance on a fixed budget,

remember the three ps. what are the three ps? the three ps of life insurance on a fixed budget are price, price, and price. a price you can afford, a price that can't increase, and a price that fits your budget. i'm 54, what's my price? you can get coverage for $9.95 a month. i'm 65 and take medications. what's my price? also $9.95 a month. i just turned 80, what's my price? $9.95 a month for you too. if you're age 50 to 85, call now about the #1 most popular whole life insurance plan available through the colonial penn program. it has an affordable rate starting at $9.95 a month. no medical exam, no health questions. your acceptance is guaranteed. and this plan has a guaranteed lifetime rate lock so your rate can never go up for any reason. so call now for free information

and you'll also get this free beneficiary planner. and it's yours free just for calling. so call now for free information.

for your most brilliant smile, crest has you covered. “nice smile, brad.” “nice!” “thanks?” crest 3d white. 100% more stain removal. crest. the #1 toothpaste brand in america.

we know our politics are very polarized in this country and it feels like election day is becoming another sport, kind of a super bowl, you will, of politics. so we're gathering with family and friends to watch the returns. we may need to have some special election day comfort foods. at least "the new york times" thinks so. they're out with a list featuring dozens of recipes, everything from french onion style mac and cheese and empanadas and talking about this as election day food recipes. >> is this basically super bowl meets fourth of july? is that what election day food is? >> i don't know. >> it's just like fatty comfort food is what we'll need on election day. >> apparently. >> let's bring back our panel.

ron, obviously you have some sort of election day ritual. >> i was looking at these recipes and i thought they kind of failed to incorporate the stress americans are already feeling on election day. >> that would be a big bottle of booze. >> this was like heart attack on a stick. you put them in an environment where people are already under a lot of stress? they probably needed the booze. i'm not so sure that would be great around midnight either the way elections are going. >> there are things like mexican hotdogs, butternut squash with parmesan, crispy treats, pumpkin blondies, southern mac and cheese. >> there was a georgia as in like the country, not the state, cheesy bread thing that looked really good. >> come on. there's one answer for this on any day it works, nachos. that is the answer. >> i think it made it in there. >> for comfort food, for the super bowl, for any day. what day aren't nachos right

for? >> dante is laughing that any of this is super bowl. >> no. i actually see the similarities. i think the midterms are essentially like the playoffs, the lead-up to the presidential election and the presidential election is like the super bowl. >> we can only hope america at large would pay attention and participate and come together around elections as a ritual. >> in 2020 there were approximately as many as who watch the super bowl. we should look it up here, somebody grab their phone. super bowl is like 160. we always used to say more people watch the super bowl than voted and i think it actually kind of converged. >> there was a comparison point. >> i remember saying that. >> when it came to the january 6th committee, how many people, but this also tells you they're eating for the super bowl, donte, it's like the idea

of the togetherness and this is also about anxiety, right? >> especially when you don't know the outcome. with we go into some elections and think my person is going to win. >> then it doesn't happen. >> and the comfort food is there to reel you back into reality. >> it used to be over 100 million. >> i love the idea of like this ritual in coming together, but i will say there's a deep lift to this. 1771, so even before everything came together as a country, election cake was a thing. >> what is it? >> it is a yeasty cake with spices and nuts to help preserve it and it was started in connecticut and shared with people who were coming to town for the vote count. food is a ritual thing. it's how we come together, but to ron's point --

>> girl, you lost me at yeasty cake. >> seem like a donuty kind of yeasty cake thing. to ron's point, it sounds like a great number to participate in an election, but for a developing world we rank 30 out of 35 for participation. the number of people who could be voting and participating, like 20%, are like oh, it just wasn't very important this time. >> again, i think nachos could only help. >> 110 to 115 usually is what they historically were and now it's like everything else on just being fractionated. >> we've learned a lot of fun facts here today. thank you all very much. time for you to sound off. we'll read your tweets next. e.. well, us... a fortune. no matter how much we paid it was always just... there. you know? so, i broke up with my bad student loan debt and refinanced with sofi. turns out we could save thousands. break up with bad student loan debt

and refi with sofi. you could save thousands and pay no fees. go to sofi.com to view your rate. sofi get your money right. ah, these bills are crazy. she has no idea she's sitting on a goldmine. well she doesn't know that if she owns a life insurance policy of $100,000 or more she can sell all or part of it to coventry for cash. even a term policy. even a term policy? even a term policy! find out if you're sitting on a goldmine. call coventry direct today at the number on your screen, or visit coventrydirect.com.

why do nearly one million businesses choose stamps.com to mail and ship? stamps.com is convenient you get the services of the post office right on your computer stamps.com saves you money with great rates from usps and ups mail letters ship packages anytime anywhere for less a lot less get our special tv offer a 4-week trial plus postage and a digital scale go to stamps.com/tv and get started today

it's time to sound off. here's what viewers are saying tonight. this says, "i voted today. i'm a proud democrat. i voted for democrats, independents and republicans alike. i vote on character and honesty, not one person or one party can fix the problems we have. it's going to take a collective people." okay. >> i appreciate that. look, everyone says tacos and cnn, there's no better combination. i agree. you like the nachos. >> no. i like that combination. that's delicious. here's one i think directed at me or champagne. why not champagne and nachos? >> depends on if maybe you're in a festive mood to celebrate the champagne. there's one, you know where to find this. there is one person who was laughing about that mario soundtrack got them. >> yes. i heard that. somebody was saying they loved that. hold on.

there's one more i want to read, too. "a great red wine, well-aged cheese, crackers and grapes. your election coverage is one of the best and i am canadian." >> one more, it's "i'm a jim crow baby. intimidation won't work with me. i will vote with pride, not fear." >> now you can good night us. >> good night, everyone. i'm going to get nachos. thanks for watching! >> our coverage continues. for a cleaner, healthier mouth. listerine. feel the whoa!

hey, i just got a text from my sister. you remember rick, her neighbor? sure, he's the 76-year-old guy who still runs marathons, right? sadly, not anymore. wow. so sudden. um, we're not about to have the "we need life insurance" conversation again, are we?

no, we're having the "we're getting coverage so we don't have to worry about it" conversation. so you're calling about the $9.95 a month plan -from colonial penn? -i am. we put it off long enough. we are getting that $9.95 plan, today. (jonathan) is it time for you to call about the $9.95 plan? i'm jonathan from colonial penn life insurance company. sometimes we just need a reminder not to take today for granted. if you're age 50 to 85, you can get guaranteed acceptance whole life insurance starting at just $9.95 a month. there are no health questions so you can't be turned down for any health reason. the $9.95 plan is colonial penn's number one most popular whole life plan. options start at just $9.95 a month. that's less than 35 cents a day. your rate can never go up. it's locked in for life. call today for free information. and you'll also get this free beneficiary planner, so call now. (soft music) ♪

hello, colonial penn?

hello and a warm welcome to our viewer