>> thank you so much for joining us tonight you can tell us not to talk. our coverage continues now was lovable, loyal. an awesome, adorable allison.

how do you like that? i did a little alliterations. our challenge myself i give each two adjectives. >> you are really upping the ante. aren't you ever insightful jake. >> that is the start of the day. >> a laboratory verna description, but that's fine. >> the al adjectives i confess i was a little hard pressed. >> i should've come in with some caution today. i appreciate it. >> it's halloween trick-or-treating with our kids tonight. >> i've been here all, they will be talking about? >> we've already done halloween. we are good at home with our kids. >> with a full-size snickers bars, i appreciate that. thank you so much. >> you went home and trick-or-treated? >> i did, i did. what rodgers wants a? you do everything it manages backwards and in heels.

you want something done, give it to a busy woman. >> interesting, have a good, show happy halloween! >> i'm alison toronto new york. i'm already crying for some reason, my humor making enough. this is cnn tonight. a fractured skull, it's one shocking detail after another. the suspect has multiple serious crimes, including attempted murder and kidnapping. he had zip ties, tape, rope and at least one hammer. >> that court filing shows how you get nancy pelosi -- breaker kneecaps. if you did not hire -- san francisco district attorney appears the attack was politically motivated. all this information, all the facts who witnessed a crime are

not enough right-wing tons breezy fear is to spread their own twisted baseless theories. of course, elon musk's -- let's bring in my panel which is john miller, cnn chief intelligence analyst. in the washington post max. let's go devolving here tonight. as someone for whom decades as all the evidence. it must be frustrating to you to do all this reporting and then ceo of east range, twisted theories cropped up online from people with millions of followers. so, let's debunk some of them tonight because i know you have the latest information. we know, paul pelosi and the attacker did not know each other. correct? >> they both agree on that. >> very good. >> was there a third person who

opened the door for the top? >> no, pelosi open the door for the cops we. they didn't get interview him really until sunday night. but they did interview the suspect and he said pelosi open the door. since then pelosi city open the door. >> here's what the da said today about the timeline. we we got more information, here's this one. >> at some point during that encounter, mr. pelosi attempted to access elevator in the home. it has a phone. the defendant blocked to that elevator. after mr. pelosi asked to go the bathroom, which is where he was able to call in one for his cell phone. the defendant realizing that mr. pelosi called 9-1-1.

-- >> it's scary stuff, john what more do we need to know? >> one of the developments that came out today which really hasn't been discussed is, there is a statement we when he is interviewed by the fbi, the capitol police and san francisco police and prosecutors at the same time. he is making a derogatory comment. that's what hillary clinton, hunter biden. we he says it is going to get nancy pelosi to lure one of them to the house. so, think about that for second ali. it's a plan where he is kidnapping and held hostage the speaker of the house. he's going to tie him up so that he's a suspect and taken appalachian answer to come home. he's very tired. on the nancy comes home, he's gonna interrogator and maybe baker kneecaps. and then we're dealing with the

political spectrum to kidnap the location. that is a lot. >> it's hard to see how this could be anything but political violence, given all of that that you just talked about. >> i think if you look at that stat you title 18, you asked code 115 when you read the statue of biden who assault, threatens, threatens to assault, kidnapped are held hostage federal fischel to intimidate them from doing their job. or a family member, it takes every part of the statue. we -- >> it's as isn't our time that conspiracy theories can't go to pervert. it's not 9/11, it's not sandy hook school shooting. it's not bad enough for them. they have to make it more twisted. the fact that elon musk peddled this along with the steve bannon's of the world and the roger stone's. it shows what horrible judgment

he has. >> it actually shows you how much deeper this goes in the random fringe conspiracy theorist as china makes is something it's not. we have the new owner of twitter, the richest man in the world and some of the largest twitter audience in the world retweeting a conspiracy theory that has no evidence and completely baseless in the wake of this awful attack. when you get the detail about the attack, it makes it clear that this was much worse than he was initially realized. we realized it was really bad, it was even worse than we realized. as a current political item. this is a metaphor that i love. climate change did not hurricanes, but it made the much worse. it's the same of political violence. it has always existed on all sides of the political spectrum. it's making it much worse and it's a right-wing problem right now. we cannot both sides this given what we had seen we.

>> you are piece but the washington post about this yesterday? it's about how it's not both sides actually. the lion's share of this is right-wing political violence. >> absolutely i mean you saw that threat against members of congress increase we in 2016, his followers still engage in a violent extremist rhetoric. remember that trump's been calling speaker pelosi crazy nancy for years. remember that this attack consensus goes asking where nancy is. it's pretty much the same thing with the mob is asking ordinary six maybe the capital. it's not divorce from the republican party. unfortunately if you see the reaction of the republican party, we're saying why we have the cycle of violence. republicans are not denouncing the extremists in their own way. you see a lot of republicans with really sick stuff. these officials are making fun

of it, they're poking fun with a pop pelosi who could've easily died in this horrifying salt. you see of course as you mentioned, all these things saying conspiracy theories -- as i put in republican influencers, and there's a real sickness on the line here. it's a combination of extremist rhetoric. we are very concerned they don't see republicans taking a step back and asking about their responsibility for creating this climate. we >> thank you for all these insights. laura, i handed to your panel. >> speaking to that notion, we it's a political analyst. and then kim, a law enforcement analyst. let's pick up where they left off. it's not just a moral equivalency. it's becoming a punchline already.

we hear was kari lake out of arizona. already trying to look at this issue from the perspective of keeping school safe. but using pelosi's a punchline. look at this. >> it is not impossible to protect your kids at school. they act like it. is nancy pelosi, she has protection. the house doesn't have a lot of protection. >> i mean this is a very serious matter. it's not like he's out of the woods yet. we know something about what happened we and it's the prospects of violence. you see this great deal. the law enforcement perspective and then also how this inter-specks. >> we know laura how this language resonates with the very most extreme segment of the population. we've seen it often, we've seen in many cases.

for donald trump, the traveled up to washington d.c.. there was a pizza restaurant following for qanon. we know conspiracy theories and heated rhetoric really resonates -- we talk about political leaders in the right right now. they know that that sort of language which resonates with their supporters. we there willing to say things, we heard it from kari lake and others. the short term personal political benefit is worse the rest unaired creating. but it's despicable. >> i think about why it resonates and the way of having an appealing to politics. we it's almost like, look what happens with those who live in glass houses shouldn't throw

stones. the idea politically speaking we think about this, why is it continued to resonate? terms of how strategist think about this. one reason why it's festering is that there are voices with an own party we -- this is wrong, this is an act of political violence. there are many republican leaders who had contacted this. it's reaching out to speaker pelosi. but i haven't heard many if at all republican voices saying, what carolina saying is wrong. we we someone the right, the conspiracies peers are spreading is wrong. when you don't have that it's allowed to spread and faster. and that is kind of what we are seeing right now. we in part he wanted to break the kneecaps unless you told

him the truth. it seems to be rooted in his vision of conspiracy theories and what to hold count to. we they were calling for nancy on january 6th as well. it should strike people, this is somebody who is in a direct line of succession for the presidency. we're not talking about anyone as a target of being problematic, with this consistently targets her with. there's no question that donald trump and many of his followers -- it was very purposeful in turning pelosi and demonizing right now. we it long predates donald trump -- with the most ardent in public life. let's be real about. that nancy pelosi was the first woman speaker when she was elected speaker before donald trump as president. republicans at that time major

international face of the campaign to reclaim control of the house. they demonized are at the time. what's different and very important, we it's in astonishing rise political threats of violence. that is what skyrocketed since donald trump was president. and of course to your point. what was it this attack or allegedly was saying about nancy pelosi in the truth? that relates very specifically to the lie about the election. that's very important. it's an agenda that has now become the republican party's agenda. i don't know about you but it's not just what carrie said, it's the laughter. we it's the laughter of what i found to be haunting. >> that's why you asked the question, why do the politicians do it? we because popular, they get a

laugh and of an 82-year-old man and icu fighting for his life. >> that's absolutely right. >> we think about, this -- >> we can talk about that demonization of nancy pelosi. you see that in we are nancy's quote the leader of the pack of the democratic party. that's the mindset he brings into this attack. that's going after nancy pelosi in the home. he takes it instead. >> we think about where we are and what could've happened. there's a conversation of course of the idea of security forces. i can't help but think back to congressional game. good secret service, as we're present because of a line of succession. >> all true. i think with the panelist talking about, it's not just disagreeing with someone.

it is dehumanizing the other sides that you can laugh at them. you can call them names. they are leader to fill in the blank. we that is leading the violence. we do see the direct line. so tell us what you think about why so many people can't deal with facts false for conspiracy theories. what can be done? anything else you want to say to warn me, you can tweet us and hashtag cnn sound off.

new projects means new project managers. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. when you sponsor a job, you immediately get your shortlist of quality candidates, whose resumes on indeed match your job criteria. visit indeed.com/hire and get started today. (vo) a thin painted line.

the only thing between you and a life-changing accident. but are these lines enough? a subaru with eyesight... (kid vo) hey dad! (vo) ...watches the lines for any danger... and can automatically stop itself. (mom) is everyone ok? (kid) i'm ok. (vo) your family is safer in a three-row subaru ascent. love. it's what makes subaru, subaru. president biden signed the inflation reduction act into law this afternoon. ok, so what exactly does it mean for you? out of pocket costs for drugs will be capped. for seniors, insulin will be just $35. families will save $2,400 on health care premiums. energy costs, down an average of $1,800 a year for families. and it's paid for by making the biggest corporations pay what they owe. president biden's bill doesn't fix everything, but it will save your family money.

>> for now swing state polls show just how close the races on the final days before midterms. in nevada, the race for senate is in a dead heat between catherine -- and republican adam laxalt. in georgia, senator raphael -- is ahead of herschel walker but still within the margin of error. and mark kelly holds a narrow lead over blake masters in arizona, in pennsylvania john fetterman has a slim lead over doctor minett oz. and yet the democrats best hope for a pick up seat. i want to bring in our panel we have cnn political commentator charlie dent, charles -- and political analyst --

. let's start with you and look at where the big names are who are hitting the trail this week. so, donald trump will be in iowa, pennsylvania, florida and ohio. president biden will be in new mexico, florida tomorrow, maryland, pennsylvania this weekend. and then obama tomorrow and nevada, once arizona, pennsylvania this weekend. what does that tell us? what does that not tell us? >> i think it shows us what we know are going to be the races. this is going to really come down to, specifically that race in nevada, arizona. when you look at georgia, pennsylvania. this is going to be where the senators lost. but in the democrats best hope here, they were hoping to have a little bit more off -- they are really playing defense and hoping to keep that 50/50 split going. they're calling in the big guns. president biden does have an agenda. he can point to this even though the job approval rating has a big getting him called. and they're calling president obama who remains the most popular person for them in the

party. and bringing it in terms of endorsement, it's not driving the base energy in the same way that they need. they are coming in on a downward slope and not an upward slope. no matter which democrats you talk to right now. >> let's talk about whether or not former president obama driving the energy. so, he is in wisconsin this weekend. he was there for the democrat barnes who was running against senator ron johnson. and basically he was joking about what is an endgame. so, here's this moment. >> >> i know these ads are running this way. but just because mandela's name mandela -- just because he's a democrat funny name, he must not be like you. he must not cherry valley you've seen this, it sounds pretty familiar doesn't it? so, get ready to dig up that

press certificate. they're ready. >> so obviously president obama's very popular. maybe doesn't speier somehow. but i know you don't think this will make a bit of difference. >> i don't. >> why. >> the midterm dynamic is really set in stone. in fact president obama didn't advocate to record himself in 2010. the democrats were wept on the house. and then in 2014 the senate lost in addition to somehow seats. this is a consolation prize. i remember when bill clinton came in against me twice. joe biden and then obama once. i was running off the polls and i said, what is this all about? where they were shut me down here for. it's just a consolation prize. >> that's a, right let them come up. i don't think it's gonna make any difference. things are moving towards a republican side on the issues they're gonna try to fight history but it don't think they're gonna be good outcome

in the house for sure. and maybe not the senate. >> after a charlie, i think the question is what moves the needle at this point? you have seven races that are pretty much all within the margin of error. well it excites people and is a political superstar, you won't forget until you see men's element. the question is what moves the needle? one of the closing arguments? he tried to make the argument of this election is really about a check on the supreme court the people often make sure their rights are protected in the state level but is not enough to move people and move swing voters? people are tying inflation to the president. that argument doesn't help. they blame the current administration for what happened in the economy. the question is, what gets people to the polls. we are 20 million people who already voted. it doesn't matter, they already cast their valid. what is happening right now makes no difference to them. all of us can be exciting and useful organizing to one obama

get people out to get out there, get names to make sure people are registered. but i don't see it changing anything in these races. >> obama talked about that -- it's not to be mosby, so here's that. >> i'm here to tell you that tuning out is not an option. moping is not an option. we don't have time to mop. don't get bamboozled, don't fall for the okey dokey who says nothing. you go out and what? vote. >> a pep talk. >> absolutely, it's what we're gonna hear more democrats giving. when you talk democratic strategist, they will talk about political nihilism among their base. the idea that their base feels so checked, out so disconnected from the system. it's so pessimistic about the future that they're not receiving any political

messages. i think that's with the former president is trying to speak to right there. the problem for democrats is that there's good reason for folks to feel like that. there is a real broken system that hasn't delivered for democrats and their biggest issues. they keep running into a filibuster. they keep running into gerrymandering. they keep having to deliver those excuses for their base to say why they didn't follow through on those core campaign promises. so, it's a self fulfilling prophecy for the party. but since they're not feeling that, they're having trouble getting the basic side again. >> charles you have talked to think quite an unvarnished way about how he is performing since his stroke. you say they are quite pronounced, he felt during the debate. so, don lemon sat down with john fetterman. you will see more of a tomorrow morning with a new morning show launches here on cnn. but here is a piece of that.

>> let me start with the aftermath of a violent attack on the house speakers has been at their home. what does the attack and the subsequent conspiracy theory state both the politics right now? >> yeah, of course it was appalled by that. it's a kind of picture that was out there. this conversation i won american idol astonishing. it is unconscionable. >> elon musk pushing with his attack on him. what is your message as he takes over this giant megaphone that is twitter? >> no, i just am really about saying i just wanna make sure that we use your enormous power to -- we don't the platform reports

those kinds of theories. >> any thoughts? >> i feel sad for him. they chatted about that debate. >> i'm sympathetic to people that had strokes. i lost my grandfather to a stroke. it killed mediately. i lost my aunt three days after one. my other and 15 years no chair. i very sympathetic. but at the same time, they just have not been transparent about this. they shouldn't have replaced him back on the ballot in the summertime. they understated the problem, they were forced into that debate. they shouldn't have done it. >> you could argue that during that debate was ultimate transparency. >> i have a dish release the medical records. what is so hard about that? just trust us, everything is gonna be okay. and very good friends with senator kirk. he had a massive stroke on here. he was very transparent about anything.

he's been paralyzed, it took me a year to get back to this. >> i don't think the medical records tell you exactly where day you're gonna be better from a stroke and when you're not gonna have work difficulties. we did release a letter from his doctor, i guess my point is i don't know if that would've been satisfied. but either way, it is possible also that our one-on-one interview with is an easier one to process. we will see one on don's show, on the morning show. they have the full interview. >> i think the problem is it raised too many questions. there's a tremendous amount of compassion for his recovery in the process. i think the debate in some of the interviews that we have seen since, he's out there trying to do little damage control. they continue to raise questions on whether or not he has recovered enough to perform the duties required of him. and whether not the campaign has been -- >> yes, absolutely thank you very much.

laura, everyone should tune in tomorrow morning 69. we will see the full interview as well as the interaction. >> almost taken aback alison. i was looking at the substance of what he said. one of the constant refrains i hear from people is the emphasis they believe the media is unfairly putting on john based on his stroke. basically putting form over substance in how people view the content of his message. as the attack on mr. pelosi. but you see widespread conversations about how and what he's doing to communicate. i was wondering if the voters of pennsylvania have that same focus. we transparency or not, i'm wondering that live eight days to go until we actually see what that will look like. but i'll be curious to see what happens. >> yet he's lieutenant governor so they know him. they probably have opinions on his record and on him prior to the stroke.

but, yes, we shall see. >> we know what we won't see anytime soon as the supreme court's ruling on an important case today because they could be poised to change the role of rays deciding who gets into college, and the question everyone's asking, especially today was should raise even be a factor? i'll make the case, next arades? so, we use rakuten to get cha-ching. while we're gaming? go. ♪ ♪ wewe get cash back at over 3,500 stores. cha-ching! health and beauty, clothes, electronics... no, no. office supplies? uh huh! shoes, home and garden... travel! on all of that and more. [buzzer] so, even when we're losing game night, we're winning. gulliver's travels. so close.

opportunities are all about timing. it's time to take advantage of a plan that gives you more for your medicare dollar. a medicare advantage plan from unitedhealthcare. so, give unitedhealthcare a call today. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

>> two schools, one is harvard, the oldest private institution, the other university north carolina, the oldest public institution in the country. but because both accept federal money for programs, they have

to answer the same question, can you consider race in admissions without violating people protection? now one said, absolutely you can. you should be able to consider race as long as it's not the only or sold decisive factor. it's probably part of a holistic evaluation that considers other criteria like extracurricular activities, or, sports or musical talent, or writing, your grades. for some, whether your parents are alums. and because raise permeates every facet of our lives and is a root cause of many of the inequalities that presently exists in our educational system, we cannot be color blind. and this holistic approach to college admission is used by a huge variety of colleges, large or small, including by the way the u.s. military academies. >> petitioners seek a sweeping ruling that would harm students as schools and colleges throughout the nation, a blanket ban on race conscious

admissions would cause racial diversity supplements that many of our nations leading educational institutions. >> then there's the other side, that answers the question by saying, no, you should not be able to consider race at all and university of not to even discover the race of the student or question it. because they argue your race should not decide where you go to school or where you cannot. after all, they say, isn't that why we fought for integrated schools? because race shouldn't matter? this argument holds that test scores and grades ought to be the primary consideration because they believe that these criteria, and they're truly objective. and because the admissions should not be able to consider race, even just referenced as part of an essay or through their membership to any organization should be considered, well, it has no or little value in how you choose a candidate. in fact the courts in u.s. justice question this very notion today. >> is there a risk of treating

people differently by not allowing some applicants to talk about that aspect of their identity? i hear a process in which there is a form that says tell us about yourself and people can put all sorts of things, i am catholic, i am from los angeles, i'm a latina, whatever. but now we're entertaining a rule in which some people can say the things they want about who they are and have that valued in the system, but other people are not going to be able to. >> and why? because even knowing the race, perhaps, may factor into the admissions process they believe. so who is right on this answer, whether you can use race as one of the factors or at all? nine justices, including three senior justices, chief justice roberts, clarence thomas, samuel alito, who've all by the

way previously decided when they had cases around whether to uphold them affirmative action, if arguments are any guide tonight, six justices seem to say that race of to be on the cutting room floor. but the why they say that is perhaps the most intriguing. it comes down to, well, timing, shall we say. >> i don't see how you could say the program will ever. and your position is that race matters because it is necessary for diversity which is necessary for this sort of education you want. it's not going to stop mattering at some particular point, you're always gonna have to look at race because you say race matters to give us the necessary diversity. >> so i guess it comes down to just how long things like affirmative action have to exist before we have reached equity in education. i mean wasn't the conceptual 25 more years reference to the 2003 decision, in greer versus mullin? sure it was one of the lesson

instances where the supreme court had to grapple with this issue unfold. president definitely as the justice seems to fear today? or maybe it's simply as long as it takes for race not to be a factor in accessing wealth or accessing resources, or housing inequality, or economic inequality. or an opportunity in general. or for race not to be a part of the effects of historical inequality, and waiting for that to resolve. maybe it takes that long? and maybe the day after that, race will be irrelevant. joining us now is the legal analyst we will go out-less, and -- some and ken is back with, us and ashley allison is also with us now. when you think about what this is an issue about the deadline, we've heard this argument in part before about the idea of america being more race neutral because of the election of a black president for example. ideas surrounding us being

color blind in the courts have really been teeing this up for quite some time, especially the chief justice right. >> that's right. it was the chief who in the voting rights case said, things have changed in the south, we no longer need certain remedies of the voting rights act in 1965. and he was incredibly animated today in this five hour hearing, very tense, but verify space too. and the chief who's also operating in a bit of a traffic cop along -- his colleagues, was really dominating including that clip you just played, laura. but also this is an area where you really he has control. a lot of people remember from june when he lost control of the decision that fully overturned roe v. wade and there are a lot of stories saying, he's lost control of the court. no, i boys felt that he lost control in a very defining case

involving roe. yes, definitely. but when it comes to race in so many more issues, john roberts is driving this cart -- this court very hard into the right. and his -- idea >> the destination is to end affirmative action? >> yes, yes, yes. think of what has already happened on the voting rights act, think of what he did in 2007 on school integration plans that was in seattle, and the louisville cases where not only was he with the majority to say that these integration plans to counteract segregated housing patterns, delivering affective segregation that those housing plans -- the school integration plans could be taking into effect. that's when you said the way to start discrimination on the basis of racist just stop discriminating them on the basis of race. and he's referred to this business of divvying as virus. he sees it only as a negative. >> he's been very reductive in that notion. the idea, here's how you stop.

just talk talking about race. is that realistic? >> no, and i think your point around the shelby case where he started to lay the foundation of making race an issue, 2013, the shelby court case -- the >> shelby county versus -- >> was decided. look at where we are on voting rights right? now look at what's going on in arizona round ballot boxes? when you make decisions like that in eliminate race, section five, section two of the voting rights act, and discrimination -- you say is not playing an integral part in our system, you're having an erosion of protecting people's rights but you we are seeing in. voting same will happen and discuss. look, i was in college when greer was argued. it was how i cut my organizing. tim it was my first protest that organizes person. we went to the sixth circuit. i knew that i was a college student at ohio state, that affirmative action was appropriate, it was benefiting why women that it was as much as benefiting students of color. as i knew that the reason why we had and segregation was because of.

raise the concept that, we don't need it because we ended segregation because of race, we still need it at because we know racism, and prejudice, and this commission exists in our country. >> i wonder how it's gonna play politically, because they weren't talking about the current events in their argument saying the same respect, but the idea of being anti woke, the idea of wanting to ensure that the government stays out of our schools, the idea of thinking about this is no longer necessary, this does play politically. i wonder how these arguments are ultimately decisions to overturn it. my play on the campaign trail. >> it hasn't -- i mean, this specific issue hasn't been the hot topic. it has been legally. what it says to me also is how we saw the overturning of the roe v. wade decision as kind of the systematic working by the conservative movement by conservative politicians, by conservative lawyers, as this big decades long project to

overturn roe v. wade. and in a similar way with affirmative action to, it's an issue that animates the right, the cultural issues animates this conservative legal world as well. and to take down a decision that has been in place since 1978, i think it would be another major victory for the legal movement and a validation of what they have done in the courts and in the senate to put these conservative legal experts in place. >> of course the question comes down to whether or not it will undermine the credibility further of the court. there's more to say about these issues and allison, when we think about where we are, just think of the conversations that are happening across this. nation tonight is what the day before earlier decision for many students across this country, it's gonna impact those students but the idea of college admissions top of mind, year in, and here out, in perpetuity. >> we know it will, in my house. we are in the throes of it right now. there is no one getting in my sleep in my house for. now i appreciated how you

spelled it out, laura. it was supposed to level the playing field and there was a hope that it would level the playing field in 20 or 25 years. but that seems to have been a very optimistic hope. but it's complicated, and i really appreciated how your panel discussed it. meanwhile, ever wonder how much your coworkers make? well, new york city is about to let you know. we will tell you what's changing, next. help comfort your loved ones. for chest, neck, and back. it goes on clear. no mess. jujust soothing comfort. try vicks vapostick.

( ♪ ) (snorting) (clattering) (frustrated grunt) i need some sleep. (groaning)

(growling) (silence) (sigh, chuckle) if you struggle with cpap, you should check out inspire. inspire. sleep apnea innovation. learn more and view important safety information at inspiresleep.com.

>> so,, laura you and i have talked before about this delicate topic. how much the people around us are paid. and of course it's a hot question and a lot of workplaces. should you know your coworkers salaries? >> well, you, know now new york city as you know is up being at the -- most employers and new york are required by law to give salary ranges to people that are

applying for jobs and i know that you think the transparency is key you have to be able to have it and i think it bodes well with most people. but i wonder from causes marked tension in the place more than anything else. >> both. it's super helpful if you're negotiating a salary or asking for race and it can also people off. >> i think the latter is probably infinitely true. >> yes. >> so it's probably both. but you know what? while we put that for a little bit, put a pin on, that we're not gonna skip halloween, right? we're gonna -- it might coincide with group reports the salaries. >> we will find a time. >> there we go.

in one second, sara yes! will get a job offer somewhere sunnier. relocating in weeks. weeks? yeah, weeks. gotta sell the house. don't worry, sell to opendoor, and move on your sedule. yes! request a ca offer at opendoor.com don't miss your shot... to get more for your medicare dollar. it's annual enrollment time, and with an aarp medicare advantage plan from unitedhealthcare, you can get $0 copays on primary care visits, more dental coverage than ever before, and $0 copays and deductibles on hundreds of prescription drugs. all for a low or $0 monthly premium. call unitedhealthcare today to talk to a medicare plan expert. ♪ ♪ we all have heroes in our lives. someone who cares about other people and gives of themselves. to help others, who can't always help themselves.

those are true heroes. and for a kid like me, who's had 13 operations, and can now walk, you might think that i'd say my hero is my doctor, or nurse, or even my physical therapist, and they are. but there's someone else who's a hero to me, and 1.5 million other kids and counting. it's someone who gives up themselves so that others will get the help they need. who is it? well, you may be surprised, but my hero is you. you. you. you. it's people just like you, who give every month to shriners hospitals for children, that make this specialized care so many kids need, possible. when you call the special number with your monthly gift, you're making a difference in the lives of thousands of kids every day. that sounds like a here to me. and because of heroes like you, i can do things now that were impossible before. i can ride my bike.

i can play basketball. yeah! and i can walk. all of this is made possible because of heroes like you who go online to loveshriners.org right now and say yes, with your monthly support. when you do, we'll send you this adorable love to the rescue blanket as a thank you. and a reminder of all the kids whose hero you are each and every month. thank you, your support has changed our lives. thank you. thank you. gracias. thank you for being my hero. please call now. if operators are busy, please call again, or go to loveshriners.org right away. the world could use some more heroes and your call will make a difference. thank you for being our hero.

your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire >> happy halloween everyone.

you have a few hours left and americans are putting on their customs and leaving out candy, and getting into the halloween spirit. and while we are here, sadly not in costume, i will add, alison -- >> were dressed as anchors. >> i guess we're just as people on tv, it's wonderful. i wanted to tell you about which states are reporting -- get this, the most haunting. >> right, there are haunted states. and thanks to our friends at axios and the shadow lens website, we know the most haunted states. it turns out wyoming's number one. the most haunted state meaning it has the most, quote, unexplained noises and screens. okay? who's doing all the screaming and wyoming? vermont is number two, and south dakota's number three. >> you know, that shocks may because you think of maybe open spaces, there's an echo chamber happening? but where i'm from, by the, way minnesota, we ranked number 36. >> so here's something

interesting -- >> not bragging. >> new york, where i'm from, we're far down. number 43, which is weird because i hear a lot of unexplained screens around here. >> i do too coming from our building, coming from other places. actually in d.c., i think we might hear more greens. but for whatever reason, any days -- one where or another. >> that's a little different. tell us what you think -- have you ever witnessed a haunting? what's the spookiest place you've ever been? and you can tweet us at allison or lower codes and we will tell you what everyone is saying.