tv Smerconish CNN January 7, 2023 6:00am-7:00am PST
6:00 am
6:01 am
that began way back on tuesday. along the way, we were treated to an important at times chaotic civics lesson including near fisticuffs live and on camera. friday the fourth day of voefting we saw 15 holdouts switch their allegiance during the 12th and 13th rounds of balloting, and then after an adjournment mccarthy thought he had the needed votes and at 11:00 came to a 14th vote yet one vote shy of a majority. for the first time all week he couldn't hide being visibly angry. lauren boebert and matt gaetz voted present while four other anti-mccarthy holdouts remained steadfast. it was dramatic and gripping to watch. a fistfight nearly broke out as mike rogers the chair of the house armed services committee, was physically restrained from matt gaetz who supporters rushed to his side. on enies were heard. mccarthy thought he'd whipped the votes necessary. when it seemed they were going
6:02 am
to be adjourning for the weekend there was more arm twisting. suddenly mccarthy was smiling again. they undertook a 15th vote. andy biggs changed his vote to another candidate to present, got a standing ovation. then representative elect eli crane changed his vote to present. the calendar turned over from the second anniversary of january 6th to now january 7th. in the end, mccarthy had 216 votes, hakeem jeffries maintained his party's 212, the last six holdouts all voted present. the uniqueness of this congressional proceeding is that it was the most protracted speaker election since 1859 and that we got to watch. and not just from the usual one camera trained on a lectern. cameras are controlled by the house recording studio. that footage is used by networks like cnn, news programs, and c-span. many times since cameras were
6:03 am
first allowed in 1979 c-span has asked to add its own cameras, and each time the house has denied the request. but c-span is allowed to bring in its own cameras during certain high-profile events, and this event not only qualified but it lasted all week. so if you were watching this all go down this week here on cnn, you were watching from a feed supplied by c-span. as a result, as "the washington post" pointed out, we got to see all the sausage being made or, as "the post" described, loud booing, animated conversations in the aisles of the house chamber, sleeping children, lawmakers scrolling on their phones. we looked on as kevin mccarthy huddled with jim jordan, whose own name had been put forward by some of mccarthy's detractors. and even when new york democrat alexandria ocasio-cortez chatted with gosar. he was censured in 2021 after sharing an animated video on
6:04 am
social media showing him killing aoc. and republican congressman george santos, who's already admitted to a series of lies and fabrications, possibly facing a house ethics investigation just days after being sworn in, there he was sitting all by himself. the members did not want to associate with him as he sat there in his suit and sweater all alone. and of course last night we saw matt gaetz and boebert huddling as people tried to sway them. these are all things you would never have seen except this week. so how did it happen? the house radio tv gallery told "the washington post" that c-span was given permission in advance of the voting for its cameras to visually roam across the chamber, something normally prohibited. unless the speaker permits, c-span's access will again be restricted. and i say that's not right. we should be able to see our representatives working for us at all times, not just when the speaker position is in limbo. and that goes for congress, it
6:05 am
goes for the courts, it goes for anywhere that a citizen has a right to watch their government in person. if you can walk in off the street, then so, too, should a camera be able to film. and i think that goes for the local township building, it goes for the city hall, the school board meeting, the state legislature, your county courtroom, the supreme court of the united states, and without any limitation as to camera angle. whatever the naked eye can see, so, too should cameras at public meetings. i get the downside. some are going to showboat. for those of us who remember, the 1995 o.j. simpson criminal trial became california's longest ever because both the judge and many lawyers seemed to relish playing for a national audience. one can argue that without cameras this week what took 15 ballots would have been resolved much sooner if fewer were able to watch. many representatives saw this as
6:06 am
an opportunity to become household names, fund-raising magnets. but in normal sessions, they often don't want us to see everything. i was reminded of this when i spoke to my sirius xm colleague steve scully last night. steve had a 30-year career at c-span. he turned me on to this gem from 1992 when legendary house speaker tip o'neill shared his concerns about cameras with brian lamb. >> by the way, you know, one of the things people often miss is they think we control those cameras. the house controls them. >> i never allowed you to control those cameras. don't ever change that. >> why? >> well, you know, some guy would be picking his nose and scratching his fanny on television. it goes on the negative. always trying to downcast. they're doing a good job, and the american people like that. i don't think that they should show full-scale debate with 30 members on the floor or some
6:07 am
fella taking a nap, which could happen on occasion. i just don't think that that is in the best interest of our congress, of our people. and i think that everything's going all right. leave it alone. >> there's the contrarian argument. tip's concerns notwithstanding, here's hoping what we just witnessed can continue. c-span's director of editorial operations told "the washington post" he hopes the network will be allowed to show more to the american people. "those visuals are really speaking to viewers. it's helping to tell the story of this speaker election." now imagine if we were able to do that when there's a major piece of legislation. i think it would be far more engaging for american people and voters would really be able to see who's talking to who. of course he's right. tell me if you agree -- this is today's poll question at smerconish.com. should the speaker allow c-span cameras full access to the house chamber for all proceedings?
6:08 am
go vote. joining me now with the latest on the speaker's battle, cnn's washington correspondent sunlen serfaty. good morning to you. tell me about that near brawl, because it took almost fisticuffs to resolve what happened last night. >> reporter: it certainly did, michael. such an unprecedented moment that you did a great job of highlighting, one of many on the house floor last night. certainly the only one that got nearly violent. and we saw this take place between the important 14th vote series and the 15th vote series. we saw kevin mccarthy go right to matt gaetz and start talking to him, and that's where we saw congressman mike rogers come over and he got in matt gaetz' face, essentially had to be restrained physically by another congressman to hold him back. and we saw kevin mccarthy kind of look at the tussle up there on the floor and return there. that was an important moment because that was when mccarthy did not have the votes, and then
6:09 am
the 15th vote of course is when he notched that win, getting 216 votes to become the next speaker. he got there because in the end matt gaetz did vote present along with five other holdouts, that key group of conservative house republicans that had been voting against kevin mccarthy all week, all of the previous votes. they ultimately voted present, which lowered that threshold for kevin mccarthy to score this major historic and at times very ugly victory. >> so, in the end, gaetz and company, what did they get for their opposition? >> reporter: they certainly got a lot and significant that matt gaetz even himself admitted that. someone asked him what changed between the 14th and 16th votes -- excuse me, 14th and 15th vote, and he said essentially i didn't have anything else to ask for here. kevin mccarthy in the end made major, major concessions. some of them very procedural but important to many of the house
6:10 am
conservatives, members of the house freedom caucus that were pushing kevin mccarthy to makec give them more power in the he lowered the threshold from five to one. only one vote now needed to oust the speaker. that is something that he previously said he would never do. and he negotiated and compromised in the end. 72 hours to review bills, for example, more house freedom caucus members on the important house rules committee. also he agreed that any efforts to raise the national debt ceiling would also be met with spending cuts. that's something that likely will cause a lot of chaos and conflict upcoming. senate democrats, that's a nonstarter for them. also gives the ability for more members to make amendments on the floor. essentially, it gives away a lot of the powers of the speakership. that's what we needed here, michael, to get him to victory. >> sunlen, all week long with every vote, the reporting was
6:11 am
all about the humiliation that was being sustained by kevin mccarthy. and yet when all was said and done, i'm going to the run a short clip and then ask you a question about it. here was the new house speaker. >> that was easy, huh? i never thought we'd get up here. thank you, minority leader jeffries. hakeem, i have to warn you, two years ago i got 100% of the vote from my conference. >> sunlen, here's the question. i know we're dug in along political lines. rs are for him, ds against him and so forth. but do you think there's some redeeming quality for mccarthy in standing there and taking it or sitting there and taking it and in the end gets off the canvas and wins the battle he set out? do you think there's an upside for him despite what he had to
6:12 am
give away? >> i. >> reporter: i think there could be most likely in potentially his confidence going forward. i mean, this has been a years-long quest for him. of course he dropped out of the speaker's race years ago as well. so certainly this is a big win for him, just emotionally. but although as you played there, he played up that this was not an easy battle to get there, but he played up in that speech last night shortly after 1:00 a.m. this morning the unity and, you know, what he will try to bring to the house going forward. but this is likely just a preview of what's to come. the fact that it took so long to get here really underscores not only, one, that he has a very, very narrow majority in the house, that's going to be hard for him, but that he has this raucous and chaotic side of the conference, the fact that he has this bloc of very conservative members that we've seen already really flex their muscles, this
6:13 am
is going to the continue to raise a problem for him going forward. so it's going to be a hard slog and that starts on monday when the house reconvenes. they have to pack the rules package. that potentially could not be easy. then it's on to legislating after that. >> if i get my wish, the cameras will be there and we will get to watch everything. sunlen, that was excellent. thank you very much. what are your thoughts? tweet me @smerconish. hit me up on social media. i'll read responses throughout the course of the program. what do we have? "i believe the members are the most concerned a roving camera shot will catch them dozing off," raw hide says. yeah. they don't want what i'm advocating. but who cares? we should want it and have a right to it. something else, this is congresswoman katie porter from orange county, california, reading a book. oh. check out the title of that book. all right. i'll give you another one.
6:14 am
here's marjorie taylor greene. check out her cell phone. can you zoom in on that, katherine? d.t. it's not e.t. it's d.t. you know who that is. d.t. phone home. it's the former president calling to try and strong arm someone to vote for kevin mccarthy in all of this. how can we not see this? all this great sausage being made? go to smerconish.com and answer this week's poll question, because this is what i'm asking. i'm asking in this week's poll question should the speaker allow c-span cameras full access to the house chambers for all proceedings? why should this week have to end? up ahead, despite obtaining a ph.d. in criminology, the idaho murder couldn't help but leetch clues behind, cell phone signals and his dna on a knife sheath in the victim's bed. i'm going to talk to dna crime
6:15 am
solver, one of america's leading experts on this case. joond a in prince harry's new memoir, he relates his fistfight with william, his drug use, his loss of virginity at 17, his father's coldness around diana's death. these and many more juicy details are begging the question has harry gone too far? who better to ask than princess diana's chief of staff. >> two princes -- a true story. william set down the water. then he called me another name. >> you're a wanker! >> then he came at me, we tussled, i landed on the floor, which cracked under my back, the pieces cutting into me. i got to my feet and told him to get out. then i made him face the music.
6:16 am
at adp, we use data-driven insights to design solutions to help u manage payroll, benefits, and hr today, so you can have more success tomorrow. ♪ one thing leads to another, yeah, yeah♪ dry skin is sensitive skin, too. and it's natural. treat it that way with aveeno® daily moisture. formulated with nourishing, prebiotic oat. it's clinically proven to moisturize dry skin for 24 hours. aveeno® aubree: i'm aubree. i went to st. jude because i had a cancerous tumor. casey: these kids, they don't deserve to have to go through this. my beautiful little redheaded girl has cancer. you don't know what's going to happen. narrator: please call or go online and become a st. jude partner in hope for only $19 a month.
6:17 am
6:18 am
choose stelara® from the start... and move toward relief after the first dose... with injections every two months. stelara® may increase your risk of infections, some serious, and cancer. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms, sores, new skin growths, have had cancer, or if you need a vaccine. pres, a rare, potentially fatal brain condition, may be possible. some serious allergic reactions and lung inflammation can occur. feel unstoppable. ask your doctor how lasting remission can start with stelara®. janssen can help you explore cost support options. (vo) sail through the heart of historic cities and unforgettable scenery with viking.
6:19 am
unpack once, and get closer to iconic landmarks, local life, and cultural treasures. because when you experience europe on a viking longship, you'll spend less time getting there and more time being there. viking. exploring the world in comfort. the dna will get you every time. it's how the suspect in the mid-november stabbing deaths of four idaho students was finally tracked down and arrested. that's what we learned when the affidavit of probable cause was
6:20 am
unsealed in idaho court this week. investigators had found a leather knife sheath on the bed of one of the victims. they found a dna sample on the button of the sheath. this and the cell phone records tracing his whereabouts capped the many weeks-long investigation that included narrowing down which white hyundai elantra had been captured on videos in the neighborhood of the house where the killings took place. a washington state university officer then located a 2015 white hyundai elantra in an apartment complex parking lot. the own ears driver's license information and photograph were consistent with the surviving roommate's description of the masked suspect's height and build and bushy eyebrows. additionally, five days after the murders, the suspect had obtained a new license plate for his car. the car was located at the suspect's family residence in pennsylvania. cnn has reported it was under surveillance, and he was seen cleaning his car inside and out using surgical gloves and depositing trash in the wee hours in a neighbor's garbage
6:21 am
can. on december 27th, pennsylvania law enforcement discovered that trash and sent it to the idaho state lab for dna testing. the very next day, the lab was able to match a dna profile obtained from the trash as all but assured as being from the biological father to a person whose dna was found on the knife sheath. as the document states, at least 99.9998% of the male population would be expected to be excluded from the possibility of being the suspect's biological father. joining me now is c.c. moore, held of genetic genealogy services for nanolabs law enforcement unit which has made more than 200 successful identifications of violent criminals. she's not worked the idaho case. she stars in the documentary series "the genetic detective" now streaming on abc, and she also has worked on all ten seasons of the pbs television
6:22 am
documentary series "finding your roots with henly louis gates jr." c.c., thank you for being here. what does this mean, single source of male dna, which i'm reading from the affidavit? >> it means there were no other dna detected on that, meaning sometimes you can have a mixture. you can have multiple people's dna. you want to have single-source dna if at all possible because that really just ties that one person to that item. now, it was likely that this was touch dna. certainly it's possible there was blood. they didn't tell us what type of dna but most likely it was touch dna. and that would typically be just a few skin cells. this might have been a very small amount of dna, but because of today's technology advances, we can detect even the tiniest bit of dna. >> how reliable is it if it is
6:23 am
skin cells say in comparison to blood? >> a great question. it is more transferable. so of course you would like to have blood. you would like to have semen or saliva. they might. they haven't shown all their cards. we don't know all that they have. but touch dna, now that we can use it because of the sensitivity of our equipment, it also means you have to be more cautious about using dna as your only evidence. so it's a really positive thing that they clearly have other evidence. this is just one piece of it. we have seen dna, touch dna transfer in other cases. of course it's fairly rare, but it is something that you have to be aware of and make sure that there are other aspects of the case also pointing at the same person. >> good news, i guess, it's hard to commit murder without leaving something behind. >> that's right. yeah. i've been saying this for weeks.
6:24 am
that type of violent intimate crime, it is virtually impossible not to leave something behind. even if you are a criminology ph.d. student. so i am not at all surprised they were able to find something, even if he tried hard not to leave something. you still would. and that is great news because what it means is that anyone who perpetrates this type of crime in the future should be aware that they will be identified, they will be caught. there really is no reason that we should see serial killers, serial rapists moving forward -- this guy potentially could have become a ted bundy or even a zodiac, not identify 50d years later. but because of the dna technology, the advances that we're seeing both in investigative genetic genealogy and the ability to use tiny amounts of dna, we can identify someone whether they are in the law enforcement database or not.
6:25 am
>> the cases that you have cracked for which you have become famous are the cases that necessitate you putting together in connection with a private lab, a very complicated family history, family tree, and tracing back cousins and generations. that doesn't seem to be what took place here. >> well, i don't think we can reach that conclusion yet. investigative jeagenetic geneal is simply a tip. it's lead generator. it should never be used as evidence against a suspect. and so it is proper that it would have been left out of the affidavit in my opinion because it should snot form the basis o an arrest warrant. so even though they didn't put it in there, i don't think we can rule it out. we don't know whether it wases what initially identified him as a person of interest and then they looked more closely about that tip about the car, or it could have gone the other way, where they identified him
6:26 am
through that tip about the car and at the same time they were working on the genetic genealogy and may have built his family tree to see if it was consistent with what they were seeing. i have done that in some cases. if there are persons of interest, you can very quickly rule them out or potentially not be able to exclude them, which is what would have happened in this case, meaning they could have connected him to one or more of those matches, maybe a second, third, fourth cousin, and said, look, you know, this is somebody who is a strong person of interest. so i think there's still a lot for us to learn on what happened here. i do think it was highly likely that an advanced private outside lab was used at least somehow in this case. you know, we've all been hearing whispers of this. there's been lots of leaks that investigative genetic genealogy was used. >> right. >> so i think they were trying to or in the process of doing
6:27 am
so. >> and you make a great point. they of course don't have to put in this affidavit of probable cause, they, the prosecutors, all that they have. cece moore, that was tremendous. i thank you as always. >> thanks for having me. let's see what you're saying via social media. katherine, what else do we have about the idaho murders? dna testing is still a relatively new technology and as such should be viewed with healthy skepticism. i don't know the exactitude, michael, with which they expressed the likelihood of how many others would have been ruled out is convincing to me. but read the affidavit of probable cause. it's the triangulation of those cell phone records. it is also of course the white ela elantra, and it's the dna. i have to say that cnn's gary tuchman has a great package that continues to run on the network where he takes you to the crime location but makes the observation that for this guy to have been in close proximity, i think the number is 12 times in the weeks leading up to the
6:28 am
murder, it's not an area where a lot of people are circulating. you have to go looking for this particular house. i hadn't appreciated that until i saw gary's reporting. make sure you're voting at smerconish.com on this week's poll question. the aftermath of the speaker battle. i'm asking should the house speaker, that's now kevin mccarthy, allow c-span cameras full access to the house chamber for all proceedings? mine is a yes vote. up ahead, with his explosive new memoir, has harry now ruined his relationship with his family? i'm going to ask prince diana's former chief of staff patrick jeffson. plus, the house leadership crisis pulled the media spotlight away from gop congressman george stan toes' fabrications about his biography, his resume, and so much more. but the santos story is still a troubling reminder of a much larger problem, a lack of local investigative journalism. and i want to say something about that. s, warms
6:29 am
anand effortlessly responds to both of you. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. only frorom sleep number. hi, i'm lauren, i lost 67 pounds in 12 months on golo. golo and the release has been phenomenal in my life. it's all natural. it's not sometng that gives you the jitters. it makes you go through your days with energy, and you're not tired anymo, and your anxiety, everything is gone. it's definitely worth trying. it is an amazing product. my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis... the burning, itching. the pain. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®, most people saw 90% clearer skin at 16 weeks. the majority of people saw 90% clearer skin even at 5 years. serious allergic reactions may occur. tremfya® may increase your risk of infections
6:30 am
and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®... ask your doctor about tremfya® today. ♪ ♪ a bunch of dead guys made up work, way back when. ♪ ♪ it's our turn now we'll make it up again. ♪ ♪ we'll build freelance teams with more agility. ♪ ♪ the old way of working is deader than me. ♪ ♪ we'll scale up, and we'll scale down ♪
6:31 am
6:33 am
has prince harry finally burned all of his bridges? i'm about to ask that of princess diana's former private secretary and chief of staff patrick jeffson, who will be here. this tuesday of course comes the publication of the duke of sussex's must anticipated memoir "spare," the title referring to the role as extra in case anything happens to his brother, the heir. but the juiciest parts have already started to leak. "the daily mail" got access to a copy when it went out early in spain. and the press went wild. this is just a sampling. prince harry brands william his arch nemesis, claims that his father didn't hug him when diana died because charles is not good at expressing his emotions, claims camila plotted to take the crown and marry charles, and
6:34 am
that he and william begged his father not to marry her, claims charles made a poor taste joke during rumors that he was the son of diana and her ex-lover, major james hewitt. they smoked, dranked, and partied through his 20s, cake taking cocaine at 17, did a stint in remab, claimed he was physically attacked by his brother, who called meghan rude and difficult, claims william and kate told him to wear the nazi uniform and howled with laughter when they saw him in it. he reveals he killed 25 enemies in afghanistan, reveals that william told kate she had a baby brain before she snapped back, get your finger out of my face, reveals he got frost bit on his penis during a trip to the north pole. insert your own joke. it's a lot from a couple that claims to be avoiding the spotlight and the paparazzi, but by airing all this dirty family
6:35 am
laundry, has harry finally gong a step too far? patrick jeffson will join me after the break. oh, we have him now? good. sorry about that, patrick. i wasn't sure if we had you. i'm thrilled that we do. so, princess diana went public. how do you think, although after being sold a bill of goods, i should add, by martin bashir, how do you think she would regard harry's revelations? >> well, i think she'd have very mixed feelings about all this. on one hand -- can't really deny they also gave into the temptation -- >> gang, let's -- hang on a second. i want to hear everything that he has to say but i'm not able to hear him and neither is the audience.
6:36 am
we will come back in just a moment and we'll get into this subject with patrick jeffson. don't go away. formulated with nourishing, prebiotic oat. it's clinically prproven to moisturize dry skin for 24 h hours. aveeno® if you used shipgo this whole thing wouldn't be a thing. yeah, dad! i don't want to deal with this. oh, you brought your luggage to the airport. that's adorable. with shipgo shipping your luggage before you fly you'll never have to wait around here again. like ever. that can't be comfortable though. shipgo.com the smart, fast, easy way to travel.
6:37 am
an all-star menu of delicious subs. there's the philly, the monster, the boss. if i hadn't seen it in person, i wouldn't have believed it. eating is believing steph. the subway series. try subway's tastiest menu upgrade yet. hi, my name's steve. i lost 138 pounds on golo and i kept it off. so with other diets, you just feel like you're muscling your way through it. the reason why i like golo is plain and simple, it was easy. i didn't have to grit my teeth and do a diet. golo's a lifestyle change and you make the change and it stays off. golo's changed my life in so many ways. i sleep better, i eat better. took my shirt off for the first time in 25 years. it's golo. it's all golo. it's smarter, it's better, it will change your life forever. ♪ ♪ ♪
6:38 am
6:39 am
tremfya® may increase your risk of infections and lower your ability to fight them. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms or if you had a vaccine or plan to. emerge tremfyant®. with tremfya®. ask your doctor about tremfya® today. age-related macular degeneration may lead to severe vision loss. and if you're taking a multivitamin alone, you may be missing a critical piece. preservision. preservision areds 2 contains the only clinically proven nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. "preservision is backed by 20 years of clinical studies" "and its from the eye experts at bausch and lomb" so, ask your doctor about adding preservision. and fill in a missing piece of your plan. like i did with preservision"
6:40 am
okay. i think we've re-established contact with patrick jeffson, who was princess diana's chief of staff. patrick, welcome back. tell me how diana would regard the release of this book. >> i think diana would have two thoughts about this, one, from her experience she knows that going public with your own public dirty laundry is a very dangerous game to play. king charles did this, too, with his tell-all book in 1994. so harry has an example from both his parents of how not to do this. i think diana would be sad that he had not learned from their mistakes. >> patrick, i watched the six-part netflix documentary, and harry and meghan make the case that there are parallels between the way that she,
6:41 am
meghan, has been treated, and the way that diana was treated. do you see those parallels, those similarities? >> there are a few. i think specifically in the area of briefing, media briefing. the palace denies they do any briefing but in reality the palace surrogates are up and busy, they're organized and orchestrated. i think what megan is referring to is the way in which diana also found her briefed against in a much more systemic and overt way, i might add. but it is the reality of what happens to people when they fall out with the royal establishment. the organization reacts to defend itself, which is understandable, i suppose, given that it does operate the head of state apparatus. >> with the powers respond to the release of this book? if not directly, will they work
6:42 am
mare media sources to make sure there is a response? >> i think what we'll see is a response on two levels. on the one hand, the palace will delight -- will take satisfaction from being above the fray. it will maintain a dignified silence, which traditionally is what the royal family does. it helps maintain respect for the institution. but under the radar, there will be a lot of activity by media advisers. this is after all at the very least an annoyance, possibly a threat, not an existential threat, but it's not good for the image of the organization. it does not look like king charles is keeping his house in order. therefore, they'll want to close this down as soon as they can. but they can't do it overtly. it has to be done -- >> they were both of course at the funeral, harry and meghan at the funeral for the queen. do you think they'll be at the coronation for the king in may?
6:43 am
and we lost him. okay. well, we did get some good information from him while it lasted. still to come, the fabrications of gop congressman george santos about his past so extensive that when he arrived at the capitol this week his own colleagues shunned him. why didn't we learn about this before election day? and it's natural. treat it that way with aveeno® daily moisture. formulated with nonourishing, prebiotic oat. it's clinically proven to moisturize e dry skin for 24 hours. avaveeno®
6:44 am
subject 1: i've always heard about it, listened to stories, and cried, and thanked god that it wasn't my child. and then it was my child. subject 2: nobody is thinking about, well, what if my kid gets diagnosed with cancer? it can happen. what if it does happen? what do we do? simone: in that moment, death was not an option. and if death is not an option, then i have to find the best place that will help her to live. and st. jude was that place. azalea: ok, mommy. simone: at two years old, she was formally diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma. and that is a solid tumor, cancerous solid tumor. azalea's cancer was in a peculiar position that was made it difficult to treat.
6:45 am
ricardo: the doctor, she was telling us that, ok, the first thing you need to know is that we can take care of this. and then i was told that i wouldn't have to pay for anything. interviewer: thanks to your help, families never receive a bill from st. jude for treatment, travel, housing, or food. so they can focus on helping their child live. join with your debit or credit card right now, and we'll send you this st. jude t-shirt that you can proudly wear to show your support. simone: when you donate and when you contribute, you are saving lives around the world, not just that one child that you see on tv, or that one child that you may know. ricardo: i would say this is one of the best donations you could possibly make. these kids deserve a fighting chance. simone: st. jude saved her life. and it saved us as a family. and for that, we'll be forever grateful.
6:46 am
6:47 am
6:48 am
santos. if kevin mccarthy had won on the first ballot, we'd be focusing more on how santos was visibly shunned by his fellow republicans because of his fabrication of his resume and unclear sources of his campaign financing. but something else about santos troubles me, and that is how did someone like him get elected in the first place? i see it as a systemic failure that is only getting worse. it was only after his election in november that questions about who he is became national news. on december 19th, "the new york times" published the result of an investigation which revealed that his resume is largely fiction. santos seems to have lied about every aspect of his background -- his education, his employment, his volunteerism with an animal rescue, his income, his property ownership, his mother's ethnicity and cause of death, his religion, even whether he'd employed people who died in a mass shooting. cnn then confirmed "the times'"
6:49 am
reporting and found even more evidence of false claims. but now he's been sworn in as a member of congress because he had not violated the constitution's only requirements -- age, citizenship, state residency. how long he can remain in office, well, that's an open question. he will now likely face ethics inquiry in congress and officials in brazil say they'll reinstate fraud charges against santos now that they've found out where he is. the federal election commission has flagged issues with contributions made to his campaign and the fact that dozens of expenses listed were just below the commission's threshold to keep receipts. santos' lawyer, joe murray, responded, quote, saying this -- "the suggestion that the santos campaign engaged in any unlawful spending of campaign funds is irresponsible at best." much of this you've already heard, but here's the question we need to address which transcends this one
6:50 am
mythomaniac -- how did he fly under the radar in a race run in a pretty sophisticated area, queens and northern long island, where more than a quarter million people voted? the answer is diminished presence of low lowe cal news. gone are the days when local news has the sources to cover the council, the school board, the county courthouse, and the area's congressional race. in its report on the state of local news 2022, northwestern's university's school of journalism found in the united states two newspapers are disappearing every week. and we've lost more than 2,500 papers in the last two decades. further mor, most about a fifth of the country's population, either living in an area with no local news organization or one at risk. about 7% of the nation's
6:51 am
counties or 211 now have no local newspaper. no amount of blogging, podcasts or websites are replacing their watchdog function. in this case, there was one local paper, a weekly, that was on to santos, but their coverage was the proverbial tree falling in the forest. nobody else heard it. the north shore leader is a seve seven /* seven decades old pub ligs. grant lalli is the publisher. his family has owned the north shore leader for the past 25 years. a lifelong republican, he ran for the same seat in 1994, '96 and 2014 during the 2000 presidential election he searched adds georgood-bye floo manager. here is what he told me this week on siriusxm. >> we are embedded in the local
6:52 am
community, so we hear things. >> in september, maureen daily, the managing editor wrote this. this is in september. controversial u.s. congressional candidate george santos has finally filed his personal financial disclosure report on september 6, 20 months late, and he is claiming an i inexplicable rise in his alleged net worth to 11 million. two years ago, in 2020, his personal disclosures claimed he had no assets over $5,000, no bank accounts, no stock accounts, no real property. a net worth barely above zero. then just before the election, the same newspaper wrote this in an editorial. quote, this newspaper would like to endorse a republican for u.s. congress in new york's 3rd district, but the gop nominee, george santos, is so bizarre, unprincipled and sketchy, that we cannot. we endorse democrat robert
6:53 am
zimmerman. bizarre, unprincipled, sketchy, tough stuff from the weekly but no other outlets with a larger reach amplified their work. the publisher told me that santos voted from generic voting, people supporting their own label regardless of a candidate's individual merit and the fact that the congressional district map had changed significantly in june. initially, it was a strong democratic district, but after a gerrymandered map was thrown out it shifted. by then, santos announced, but any would-be opponent had a little bit of time before the primary to put together a competitive campaign, so he won the nomination and ultimately the general election by a comfortable eight points. kb george santos is what you get when everyone with a laptop is a wannabe journalist but no one is left paid to run down tips. the next time you hear about the closure of a local newspaper or
6:54 am
the scaling back of a newsroom, think about george santos and how many more like him might be getting away with something. still to come, more of your best and worst tweets and youtube and facebook comments and the final results of this week's poll question. go to smerconish.com now, register for the newsletter and answer this week's question. should the house speaker allow c-span cameras full access to the house chamber for all proceedings? science proves quality sleep is vital to your mental, emotional, and physical health. and we know 80% of couples sleep too hot or tooold. introducing the new sleep number clima 360 smart bed. the only smart bed in the world that aively cools, warms,
6:55 am
and effortlessly responds to both of you. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. only from sleep number. are you feeling sluggish or weighed down? metamucil's new fiber plus collagen can help. when taken daily, it supports your health, starting with your digestive system. metamucil's plant-based fiber forms a gel to trap and remove the waste that weighs you down, helps lower cholesterol and promotes healthy blood sugar levels. while its collagen peptides
6:56 am
help support your joint structures so, start feeling lighter and more energetic by taking metamucil every day. feel less sluggish and weighed down after just 14 days. sign up for the 2-week challenge at metamucil.com. ♪ ♪ a bunch of dead guys made up work, way back when. ♪ ♪ it's our turn now we'll make it up again. ♪ ♪ we'll build freelance teams with more agility. ♪ ♪ the old way of working is deader than me. ♪ ♪ we'll scale up, and we'll scale down ♪
6:57 am
6:59 am
94-6 and 36,000 people voting. mr. speaker, kevin mccarthy, we want to keep watching. please, give c-span, give cnn, all the media the same access that we've all enjoyed this week watching the sausage be made. it could be your first item of business on monday. here is some of the social media reaction that came in during the program. totally agree. put cameras everywhere, especially in politics. let's see everything. to me it's quite logical, as citizen, have you ever sat in the gallery of the house? it's a wonderful thing to do. take your kids. wherever you can go as citizen, as i said earlier, county courthouse. here is another pet peeve of mine. supreme court of the united states. those audio recordings are not enough. we ought to be able to see. if i can go look around, a
7:00 am
camera out to be able to do the same in any governmental setting. what do we have? spare us the drama, harry. has harry finally -- i mean, look, when i watch the netflix documentary, i was more sympathetic to meghan than i have been heretofore. the way the media mob follow her is reminiscent of princess diana. remember that airport scene where she has the tennis racket? there is some of that going on. but if you want to escape the media, first of all, is california where you go? do you live up the road from oprah and sign a six-part netflix teal and a five-book deal with penguin random house? that doesn't seem like a couple seeking to evade the spotlight. harry has to sell a lot of books. i think he will. i think it's 1.7 million yunus to recoup what the publisher laid out. i'll see you next week. happening now in
204 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CNN (San Francisco) Television Archive Television Archive News Search Service The Chin Grimes TV News ArchiveUploaded by TV Archive on