tell it early, tell it all,

tell it yourself. i'm michael smerconish. the crisis manager wrote a whole book called "truth to tell on how to handle a public crisis." davis' advice the exact opposite of the approach of the biden white house to date around the discovery of the classified documents in its possession. they didn't tell it early. they waited nearly two months. they didn't tell it all, in fact, a statement released on monday, and the president's words on tuesday, were almost dishonest by omission. and as for tell it yourself, instead of the president telling the full story it has fallen to karine jean-pierre. saying he takes it seriously doesn't make it so. it seems like a series of unforced errors turning what might be a benign situation into something that will surely be the focus of the subpoena power

republicans now possess after winning the house. here is how we got here. on november 2, biden lawyers discovered classified documents in an office the former vice president used in washington, d.c., associated with the university of pennsylvania. the national archives were notified. the justice department alerted. but the public was none the wiser. the midterm elections were on november 8. on december 20 another discovery was made, this time at biden's home in wilmington, again, the justice department was told but not the public. monday cbs broke the story of the documents found on november 2, the white house released a statement acknowledging that discovery but not the fact that more documents were found on december 20. on tuesday the president said he was surprised to learn of the discovery at the penn office making no mention of what was found in wilmington. as howard baker famously asked about nixon and watergate, what did the president know and when did he know it?

it would be curious if he was told about november 2's discovery but not the one on december 20. and if he did know, then why didn't he say so on tuesday or a lot sooner? so far we know that among the documents were a memo from biden to president barack obama as well as two briefing memos preparing the then vice president for phone calls, one with the british prime minister, the other with the president of the european council. it's unclear how much of this material remains sensitive. friday judiciary committee member jim jordan announced an investigation into biden's handling of classified documents, house oversight committee chair james comer is asking the white house for more documents for his committee's probe. comer pointed out that the address of president biden's home where the additional documents were found was the same one listed on hunter biden's driver's license in 2018, the same year he was conducting business deals with foreign countries. look, there's no evidence suggesting that biden's conduct rises to the recklessness

exhibited by trump at mar-a-lago, the volume of material, the return, the response to the national archives and the justice department. they're significantly different. but biden is not helping himself. maybe he's following bad legal advice. best for him and for the country is that he get out in front of this immediately, put down those lawyer notes and explain to the nation what the documents are, why he had them, what led to their discovery, and why two months elapsed before there was public disclosure. this is what i know for sure. we're going to learn all those things, but best for the president is that it comes from his lips and not the drip, drip, drip of news leaks. mr. president, tell it early. tell it all. and tell it yourself. joining me now is harvey eisenberg, a former federal

prosecutor. he worked with robert hur who was appointed to the special counsel looking into documents by merrick garland. they prosecuted harold martin, a private nsa contractor found guilty the largest theft of mishandled information in u.s. history in the late '90s through 2016. martin was convicted in 2019, sentenced to nine years in federal prison. counselor, thank you for being here. big picture question, how does the discovery of the biden documents impact any charging decision that will be made about trump? >> well, they shouldn't impact one or the other. the two cases will rest on their own facts and the decisions will rest on the facts that are uncovered by robert hur and by jack smith and their teams. >> okay, but hur and smith will make determinations whether the

law was broken and whether it can be proven. doesn't garland have to consider whether we will put the country through this process? >> i would imagine that any attorney general would have to do that in the public interest. these are unprecedented situations, obviously. and the turmoil that the prosecution of either of these two cases, should they proceed, if they, in fact, charge the former president and the current president, are something that must be considered as a matter of public policy. >> i mean, i'm asking you this question because my poll question today at smerconish.com just gave trump a get out of jail free card. if merrick garland's analysis needs to include, and we'll put the country through this, the fact now you'll have half the country say, well, first it was hillary. she didn't get prosecuted.

now it's biden. he didn't get prosecuted. but trump, trump they're going to prosecute? >> those are obviously public policy and political considerations neither of which should influence robert hur. i'm sure they will not influence robert hur or jack smith or the investigators assigned to them and other prosecutors in how they make a decision, how they find out what the evidence actually is, what the facts are, and weigh out the pluses and minuses of every defense as every prosecutor does in every case, national security cases as well. >> in general terms, in cases like this, what do you need to show for a successful prosecution? >> well, as to the assignment to my former boss, robert hur, that goes to the unlawful removal and retention of national defense information. that's often lost in the give

and take of the discussion. it does not have to mean that classified information was implicated. just as the term is defined national defense information is implicated. often, if not almost always, national defense information is also classified but doesn't have to be. that also implicates the so-called trump investigation. >> if there's simple negligence on the part of the actor, is that enough? >> no, it's not. you have to show willful intent. >> okay. how about if donald trump says, well, i thought i had a right to possess this information? is that enough if he believed it? >> the reasonable man test would apply. it then becomes a jury question if it was reasonable for him to think that.

one thing i should add, michael, if i might, we keep talking about these cases as if it's just the principals involved, former president trump and president biden. they may not be implicated at all. they have staff. somebody else could have committed the crimes if, in fact, crimes were committed, and i'm sure the investigators and the prosecutors will be looking at just that. this may wind up in indictments of other people, not the president or former president. and, of course, the current president applying the current standard cannot be prosecuted anyway while he sits as president of the united states. >> and mr. eisenberg, i point out the guy you prosecuted who is now midway through his nine years had the equivalent of 500 million pages in his possession. i point that out because i'm reading a lot and hearing a lot of folks say, well, they lock people up for this stuff, but your case was a pretty extreme case. just take 30 seconds and tell me about that.

>> well, it was the largest theft and unlawful retention of classified information ever in the country's history. hard to imagine that anyone could amass more than mr. martin did and that which he pled guilty to. he had it over 20 years, as you stated in your opening. he had it for an extended period of time. the most highly classified information available to anyone with a clearance stored in his home for all that time. it's hard -- you cannot compare that case since it is, as i said, unprecedented in scope, compared to anyone else nor anyone else's sentence they may or may not have received. >> well, thank you for explaining that and thank you for being here. we appreciate your expertise. >> thank you for having me. >> i just previewed with my guest today's poll question at smerconish.com. now i think you understand the context in which i'm asking it.

answer this question today, in fact, right now. did biden just give trump a get out of jail free card? by his actions, has he created a situation where it makes it impossible for merrick garland to prosecute trump? i can't wait to see the results. from social media, this just came in. hit me with your social media during the course of the program. why is everything about trump? can't we talk about possible wrongdoing of biden without asking about trump? no, we really can't because there's such a natural comparison here. i got the memo. i understand and i believe that there are significant differences between these cases. but in the end, you've got two american presidents, each the subject of special counsel investigation for their handling of classified material. how do you not say that as well? make sure you're voting at smerconish.com on today's poll question and we'll give you the result at the end of the hour. up ahead, congressman matt

gaetz was often center stage during the must-see live broadcast of the 15-round speaker of the house battle. c-span's independent cameras that we've so enjoyed, well, they've been removed again. so the network and gaetz are lobbying to get them back and matt gaetz is here to discuss. plus, the world is going wild experimenting with the latest artificial intelligence toy known as chatgpt. you can ask it to do anything, research, write a poem, research a legal case. how hard is it to detect? we'll find out. or “i'll have all the bacon.” we're talking about... rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity i'm going to get the rootyty tooty fresh 'n fruity the rooty tooty frfresh 'n fruity i think i'm going to have the rooty tooty fresh h 'n fruity yep, it's back. for a limited time. the six dollar rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity combo. 2 eggs, 2 bacon strips, and 2 fruit topped pancakes. only from ihop.

download the app and earn free food with every order. oh, will you pause it real quick? (mumbles) justold the car to carvana. k, hit play please. what? when did you do that? i just did it the other da all i had to do was enter the n or license plate, answer a couple queions, and got a real offer in seconds. then, they just picked up the car and paid me right on the spot. i can finally quit my job and become an actor. nah, you're right. sell your car at carvana dot com today. introducing the new sleep number climate360 smart bed. only smart bed in the world that actively cools, warms and effortlessly responds to both of you. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. only from sleep number. that performance was legendary. they just piled it on. roast beef, ham, oven roasted turkey. all on the subway club. three peat - that's great. three meat - that's epic. the subway series. the greatest menu of all time.

♪ ♪ ♪ voltaren. the joy of movement. ♪ oh, what's this? the sofia vergara collection at america's best? wow, amazing styles and unbelievable prices? now that's quite the duo. get two pairs of sofia vergara frames plus a free exam for $89.95 for a limited time at america's best.

for people who are a little intense about hydration. neutrogena® hydro boost lightweight. clinically proven. 48-hour hydration. for that healthy skin glow. neutrogena®. for people with skin. tv ratings were huge for the four-day battle for house

speaker that resulted in kevin mccarthy's election. part of the attraction was the unfettered access given to c-span cameras to televise the proceedings and provide its feed to outlets including cnn. last week i argued here the american people deserve continued unfiltered access to the house chamber, but as soon as kevin mccarthy actually took the gavel, back went the camera to its standard fixed position aimed at the lectern. those rules are set by the party that controls the house except for special events like the election of the house speaker. well, tuesday the co-ceo of c-span sent a letter to mccarthy seeking permission to operate its own independent cameras in the chamber citing the positive public reaction and the transparency themes in mccarthy's own rules package. among the congressmen who have voiced their agreement my next guest matt gaetz. gaetz was caught having private conversations with a frustrated

mccarthy, chatting with democrats including ocasio-cortez. we even saw as he was almost physically attacked by fellow congressman mike rogers, who later apologized. so much lies ahead for the 118th congress, i want these cameras to show it all, be it the looming debt limit standoff, the debates over investigations with the fbi and hunter biden, the battles over chin and the origins of covid-19. florida congressman matt gaetz joins me now. thank you for coming back. without c-span it occurs to me without c-span cameras we would not have seen you nearly attacked by mike rogers. do you think that incident is an example why some of your colleagues don't want full camera access? >> no, i think the reason people have opposed our effort to democratize the house floor in many debates no one is present and they want to maintain thn t legislatn

the floor or in committee, the camera always catches those moments, but there are also moments of great interpersonal warmth and collaboration and the forming of alliances that you might not normally see, whether it's myself talking about war powers or perfejayapal discussi with floor aoc. i think the american people would be able to humanize congress more if they saw our human interactions and not just the theater that's on display during much of the debate. >> with regard to rogers and the incident, which i'm showing now in slo-mo, what went on from your perspective? how of much did you see of him coming at you? >> mike rogers and i have worked together for six years on some of the most tense national security issues on the armed services committee, so it's not the first time we've been frustrated with one another or worked together. as a matter of fact, it wasn't a

remarkably unique incident. there are times the pressure cooker is on when we do yell and get heated and that's okay among colleagues. what was different about this it was caught on camera. so mike and i are fine. we've worked together before. we will again in the future. but if we had more dynamic camera angles, then i think you'd see these flare-ups and then the backslapping afterwards and the agreement and the american people could see alliances form and dissolve in real time rather than just getting a more curated rendition of what happens. >> as much as i want those cameras, the camera work was a little shoddy because it followed kevin mccarthy back into the well of the house and we never saw you. did you get on your feet? did you get ready for blows? how close did it come? >> oh, no, i think it was overblown. mike was expressing his frustration with mo and

different people had different perspectives in the moment. the argument against the cameras was made on your network by paul ryan. we already have enough performance in congress. we don't want people playing to the cameras. being able to see the human interactions in frustration, in warmth and all of those things far outweighs the risk people will play to the cameras. we have that during debate one way or the other. i think some of the old guard in congress opposes this because they want to continue to maintain the fiction that when four or five people are on the floor spending millions of dollars, that that is the action of the whole legislative body when the reality is far different. if we had cameras on the floor my suspicion is we would have far better attendance during debates that impact the lives of our fellow americans. >> every saturday i have a poll question, as i think you know, during the course of the program. last saturday we set a record, more than 46,000 people voted on

this issue and it could not have been more decisive. put up the result of that. i think it was 90% of people who said, yeah, 93.91% want the camera access. today, congressman, "the washington post" lead editorial is on this issue and agrees with your perspective. quick final question on this. what's the likelihood that you can sway kevin mccarthy? >> well, i'm encouraged there's actually a lot of bipartisan support for this measure. some democrats have put forth their own proposal, and so i hope if we got 218 people to agree whether they were republicans or democrats that speaker mccarthy would be very persuaded by that. and so we're working now to build that bipartisan coalition to go to the speaker. and it is in line with a lot of the goals the speaker laid out in the rules committee to have more transparency, to have more open votes, to have more open rules. let's have an open chamber for all the american people to observe.

>> on another matter that pertains to video, you apparently were able to earn a concession from him that all of the security video from capitol hill on january 6 is going to enter the public domain. first of all, correct me if i'm wrong, i believe that was something you were able to get him to agree to. secondly, what is it you want to see? what do you expect to see in that video? >> i think you likely will see a lot of exculpatory evidence where people may have been in some sort of technical violation of federal criminal law but never intended to harm anyone and never intended to breach any type of security barrier. a lot of those barriers may have been taken down. i'm a believer tra hat transpary answers question. if there's higher criminal a acuity for some. whistle-blower interviews we've done there were federal assets and agents that were on the ground that day to be able to observe their conduct, their potential coordination with one another would be of great interest to many of us on the

judiciary committee and many people throughout the country. >> so prosecutors have said, and i'm thinking in the context of the case of eric torrence from tennessee, it shouldn't be released because it's going to jeopardize security, that too much will enter the public domain about the nooks and crannies. my words, not theirs, of the capitol. are you worried you're going to jeopardize the security of yourself and your colleagues if all of this video comes into the public space? >> no. almost every inch of the capitol is subject to video surveillance. if you don't believe that, go into any casino in america and you see the extent to which the zooms and pans and tilts inform on how people see these things. so if the security of members of congress is dependent on shielding the perspectives of these cameras, it's not a good regime. i think that's a red herring and an argument made by the department of justice because they don't want to expose the extent to which there might have been federal assets or agents enhancing criminal acuity.

we don't know that. that's why we want to see the footage. i think we'll be safe and sound even following the release of that information. >> treasury secretary janet yellen said that on, i think thursday, we're going to hit the debt ceiling limit of $31 trillion. are we headed for a standoff where you and your colleagues are demanding of cuts including social security, m medicare/medicaid? >> we did include in our negotiations a reversion to 2022 spending levels that would require changing levels in the mandatory spending which is driven by medicare/medicaid, social security. i think work requirements are something we could get a lot of bipartisan agreement on particularly in states that had medicaid expansion under obamacare. remember, just as i teamed up with democrats for the floor action last week, you also may see some republicans in the middle team up with democrats to discharge a clean debt limit. there's something called a discharge petition where you get 218 signatures on something, it comes right to the floor, so

some of my conservative colleagues and i may be disappointed if you see moderate republicans working with democrats to get a clean vote on the debt limit, we would probably like to use that as an opportunity to analyze some of the mandatory spending that's given us a $32 trillion debt. >> you know that economists say if we get close to default, then what's going to happen? interest rates are going to rise. people will feel it in their mortgages. in their auto loans, in their credit card bills. >> that's why we need to start now. we should not engage in brinksmanship. we're already having the discussions with jodi arrington, the new chairman of the budget committee, how to create a budget resolution to inform on policy choices. we have an obligation as the republicans in the majority to sell to the american people work requirements or other spending reductions to get buy-in on that. i don't believe we should push this to the very end. i think we need to be laying out a plan now to get our fiscal house in order. as you know, michael, with interest rates rising, that changes the debt service

obligations of the country and it's one of the major drivers of our spending now, servicing that debt. so we have to be able to get it under control. and the math is undeniable that as more baby boomers continue to utilize the programs to drive mandatory spending, we are going to have that take a greater and greater share of the federal budget. >> i share your concern about the level of spending. by the way, that debt went up 40% on donald trump's watch. that needs to be called out as well. it's just at what stage of the process should we attack this issue? probably before the money has been committed. i have to get to one other thing with you. representative santos. you were playing the role of talk show host this week, i guess, in lieu of bannon. you asked him about the $700,000 he gave his campaign or donated or loaned his campaign. he didn't give you an answer. should he be able to get away with that level of nondisclosure? what is his future? >> george santos represents over 700,000 people in new york, and

whether people like that or not, those people deserve to have members of congress collaborating with the person who serves them, whether that's on financial issues or on public safety issues. so george santos will have to go through the congressional ethics process. i don't want to prejudge the process, but i think he deserves the chance to at least make his case. there are requirements members of congress have to meet when it comes to the money that they donate to their own campaigns. i had to publicly disclose the real property i sold to contribute to my own campaign when i was first elected in 2016, and we'll see how that process bears out. but until then, i don't think george santos should be subject to shunning because the americans he serves deserve representing and they have real challenges, and we ought to work together to solve their challenges and meet their needs. >> i watched -- i listened and i watched and i get your point there's embellishment by those who run for office, particularly the congress, but in this guy's case, more on that bio, more on

that cv was unfounded than was founded and those voters went to the polls because the media didn't shine an appropriate spotlight on it nor did his opponent without knowing for whom they were voting. isn't that a fair statement? >> you know what's crazy to me that happened in new york of all places. this wasn't rural mississippi. it was the center of the media, and i think there actually were some local outlets that reported on the concerns about santos as a candidate. >> one week late. >> that was in the public sphere. it's up to the political process to resolve those things. he is a congressman. he was seated. and so i'm going to treat him as a colleague and he's going to have to endure the process that goes through managing the conduct of members. >> my hunch is that if your margin in the house were not so thin that you and/or kevin mccarthy would have a different opinion on that issue. you know i'm going to do social media. stick around for this because to the extent it's the why is matt

gaetz on this program, i'll let you respond to it instead of me. katherine, put up on the screen what we have from the world of social media. how does it help the american people to have congress people performing for the cameras? they're already accomplish nothing and this will only get worse as they mug for publicity. what do you want to say to david who submitted that? >> we mug for publicity plenty. don't you think the american people ought to see when the actual sausage is being made? the conversations we have on the floor result in votes and bills and co-sponsorships. and i think more transparency is better. oftentimes on the floor you're lobbying for the legislation or the appropriations that you care about, and people then will be able to latch what they observe with the outcomes and make better judgments on the people there to represent them. nothing wrong with that. >> any more that i have time for or do i have to move on? tell me quickly. okay.

congressman, thanks for coming back. i do appreciate it. >> thank you, michael. coming up -- well, i'm just going to tell you what's coming up because i don't have a teleprompter. i want to get into chatgpt, and i also want to talk about a lawsuit that was filed by the seattle public schools. this is really an interesting story where they're trying to hold accountable big tech for the mental health crisis playing itself out among american youth. both of those social media, more of your voting at smerconish.com. did biden give trump a get out of jail free card when we come back. nsitive skin, too. and it's natural. treat it that way with aveeno® daily moisture. formulated with nourishing, prebiotitic oat. it's clininically proven to moisturize dry skin for 24 hours. aveeno®

♪ ♪ ♪ voltaren. the joy of movement. ♪ just look around.

this digital age we're living in, it's pretty unbelievable. problem is, not everyone's fully living in it. nobody should have to take a class or fill out a medical form on public wifi with a screen the size of your hand. home internet shouldn't be a luxury. everyone should have it and now a lot more people can. so let's go. the digital age is waiting.

because of the overwhelming popularity of a new ai program called chatgpt, educators are now wrestling with how to respond to students with new ways to harness artificial intelligence in doing their work. there are three reasons why the use of this technology should be permitted in a school setting. number one, personalized instruction. ai can help to personalize the learning experience for students. ai-powered systems can analyze student performance data and provide tailored instruction and feedback that can help students learn more effectively and achieve better outcomes. the second reason, accessibility. ai can help to improve the accessibility of education for students with disabilities. assistive technology such as

text to speech and speech recognition can help students can visual or auditory impairments to better access, engage with education materials. and a third reason, job readiness. as ai becomes increasingly important in today's job market, learning about ai can help students to develop skills that will be in high demand in the future. for example, learning to code and work with ai systems, that can help students to develop problem solving skills, data analysis, and critical thinking skills which are valuable in so many different fields. okay. time-out. what you just heard may sound like one of my commentaries. but i didn't write it, nor did any other human. it was written by the latest version of artificial intelligence, this chat bot called chatgpt. i simply typed into my laptop give me three paragraphs on why

students should be permitted to use artificial intelligence in school and you heard the outcome. there it is. i typed it last night. it's computer technology designed to stimulate conversation the gpt was released on november 30th by the artificial intelligence lab known as open ai and within a week the company estimated it already had more than a million users. it's free for now but in the future there will be a version that costs money. the way it works is by integrating massive amounts of data, immense computing power, and novel processing techniques. you ask it to do a function and it performs lightning fast answering a question, playing a game, writing a computer program, composing a poem, a speech, a song or a commentary for cnn. and unlike most chat bots while you're using it, it remembers your conversation. well, you can imagine all sorts

of uses for it including, of course, cheating in school. los angeles, seattle, baltimore, new york city schools have already restricted access to chatgpt. a columnist for bloomberg "businessweek" where he wrote the piece, what are they good for? nothing. the author of the book "the contrarian." it's pretty stunning, isn't it, max, that i can make that cogent argument, maybe a little more stilted, i hope, than i would normally be on cnn, but if i hadn't told the audience, i don't think the audience would have recognized it. >> it's pretty convincing. i do think if we spent time going back through it we would see little problems with that argument and i think just broadly speaking the school districts that are responding to this with skepticism are making a reasonable decision. i mean, this, as i wrote in my

piece, this is not good for a lot of sort of business cases. it is incredibly good if you want to, say, cheat on your schoolwork or if you're a scammer or, say, a russian disinformation farm or whatever. it's good for people trying to generate huge amounts of text that doesn't have to be especially convincing very quickly. >> right. as someone said whom you cited, superb bs-ing. that's what it allows to you do. >> yeah, and the other thing about this, and really the reason why people are banning it, why people are treating it skeptically not just in schools but we're seeing these kind of knowledge communities as well as academic groups because it makes stuff up. ai experts call this hallucination, a funny term, but essentially the ai will just invent things, names, places, points in history, and just state it with supreme conviction which can be really funny. it can get math problems wrong. and because it's so convincing

and because it moves so quickly, it can be pretty hard for people to separate the truth from the falsehood. >> max, as you said, i want to put on the screen a quote from scott rosenberg who wrote this at axios to a point you made. the applications of this extend far beyond just schools. education, it says, is where chatgpts disruptions will land first but any discipline or business built on foundations of text is in the blast radius. think law, think entertainment, think science, history, media. what other application, max, do you think this could impact? >> well, so the main investor in open ai is microsoft. i should say this is like the hottest company in silicon valley right now and the company behind this is microsoft. and i think what they want to do is put it in microsoft word essentially. this isn't how 3,000, this isn't going to take over the world. it might be a feature that could go in your word processor, you have to write a thank you letter, and it could write some

place holder text that you could then punch up later or even imagine taking that cnn monologue that you did which wasn't very good but using that kind of as a starting point perhaps. but i think that's what this is going to be, a starting point, a better word processor. >> max, thank you for that. i appreciate your expertise. still to come, the seattle public schools are suing social media for damaging the mental health of its students by purposefully exploiting, quote, the vulnerable brains of youth. while the work on these very issues is cited in the suit joins me next. and remember to vote on the poll question at smerconish.com. in the context of the discovery of the classified documents i am asking this. did biden just give trump a get out of jail free card? go vote at smerconish.com.

introducing ththe new sleep number climate360 smart bed. only smart bed in the world that actively cools, warms and effortlessly responds to bothf you. our smart sleepers get 28inutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. onl. if you used shipgo this whole thing wouldn't be a thing. yeah, dad! i don't want to deal with this. oh, you brought your luggage to the airport. that's adorable. with shipgo shipping your luggage before you fly you'll never have to wait around here again. like ever. that can't be comfortable though. shipgo.com the smart, fast, easy way to travel. dry skin is sensitive skin, too. and it's natural. treat it that way with aveeno® daily moisture. formulated with nourishing, prebiotic oat. it's clinically proven to moisturize dry skin

for 24 hours. aveeno® back when i had a working circulatory system, you had to give your right arm to find great talent. but with upwork, there's highly skilled talent from all over the globe right at your fingertips. it's where businesses meet great remote talent and remote talent meets great opportunity. ♪

♪ this is how we work now ♪ my name is wendy, i'm 51 years old, and i'm a hospital administrator. when i talk to patients you can just see from here up when you're wearing a mask. and i have noticed those lines beginning to really become not so much moderate but more severe. i'm still wendy and i got botox® cosmetic. and i'm really happy with the results because they're very subtle, and i feel like i look like myself, but just less lines. botox® cosmetic is fda approved, to temporarily make frown lines, crow's feet and forehead lines look better. the effects of botox® cosmetic may spread hours to weeks after injection causing serious symptoms. alert your doctor right away, as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness maybe a sign of a life threatening condition. do not receive botox® cosmetic if you have a skin infection. side effects may include allergic reactions, injection site pain, headache, eyebrow, eyelid drooping and eyelid swelling. tell your doctor about your medical history. muscle or nerve conditions, and medications including botulinum toxins. as these may increase the risk of serious side effects.

see for yourself at botoxcosmetic.com there's always a fresh deal on the subway app. like this one! 50% off?! that deal's so good we don't even need an eight-time all-star to tell you about it. wait what? get it before it's gone on the subway app! is big tech to blame for america's youth mental health crisis? the seattle public school district filed a 92-page lawsuit against the parent companies of tiktok, instagram, facebook, youtube and snapchat. the suit alleges the social media giants, quote, intentionally contributed to the youth mental health crisis in the united states and has impeded the ability of its schools to, quote, fulfill their educational mission. the school district is the largest in the state of washington.

they have nearly 50,000 students. they're seeking unspecified monetary damages. and the lawsuit cites a lot of data. from 2009 to 2019 the rate of high school students who reported persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness increased by 40% to one out of every three kids. kids seriously attempted suicide increased by 36%. the share creating a suicide plan increased by 44%. from 2007 to 2019, suicide rates among youth aged 10 to 24 in the united states increased by 57%. by 2018 suicide, the second leading cause of death for youth ages 10 to 24 from 2007 to 2016, emergency room visits rose 117% for anxiety disorders, 44% for mood disorders, 40% for

attention disorders. several citations in this lawsuit are of data analysis by my next guest, jean twangy, author of the influential book "i-gen." the global head of safety for meta which owns facebook and instagram released this statement, quote, we want teens to be safe online. we automatically set teens' accounts to private when they join instagram and send notifications encouraging them to take regular breaks. we don't allow content that promotes suicide, self-harm or eating disorders. a spokesperson for goggle which owns youtube responded as follows. we've invested heavily in creating safe experiences for children. we provide parents with the ability to set reminders, limit screen time and block specific types of content on unsupervised devices. joining me now is a professor of psychology at san diego state university, the author of the book that i mentioned.

her latest book will come out in april and it will be called "generations." doctor, this is really important. the data that i cited that comes from the lawsuit speaks of this period from the mid-2000s to about 2020 as a comparison. why is that time line so significant? >> well, you know, there is a lot attention to this adolescent mental health crisis, but so much of it focuses, oh, it's because of the pandemic. this did not start with the pandemic. it started more than ten years ago around 2011 or 2012 which happens to be right at the time snapchat was founded, facebook bought instagram, and social media moved from being fairly optional among teens to virtually mandatory and extremely popular. >> so there can be no dispute as to the fact that the data says we've got this mental health

crisis, that it happened at a time of the explosion of the uses of this technology. when your book first came out, you would often speak to me about correlation and not causation. where are you today? >> we have a lot more experimental evidence now suggesting it's not just correlation, that it is causation. so my colleague john hyde and i have a google doc with all of the evidence in this area, and it includes studies that can show causation, and the majority of those studies show that, say, cutting back on social media can lead to better mental health, and there's other studies showing that you increase your use of social media, then depression often follows. >> so what should the tech giants who are on the receiving end of this litigation from the

seattle public schools, what is it they ought to be doing? >> oh, there are so many other things that they could be doing. as just one, they could enforce their own age minimums. you're supposed to be 13 to have a social media account. that's not enforced. you don't have to show an i.d. you don't even need parental permission. you can just check a box or lie about your birthday and, boom, you have an instagram or tiktok account. so that's a place to start because we have 8, 9, 10-year-old kids on these platforms that were not designed for children. they weren't even designed for teens. they were designed for adults. and because of brain development and anybody who has kids knows this, there's a reason why we don't let 8-year-olds drive. there's a reason why you have to be 18 or 21 to buy cigarettes. yet social media is almost completely unregulated. so parental permission would be

another great step. not being able to use social media during the nighttime hours would be another. we also have an epidemic of sleep deprivation among teens which very well might be one of the reasons why we have a mental health crisis because not sleeping enough is very strongly linked to depression, suicidal thoughts, self-harm, all of these issues we're seeing. >> can i say that i think that 92-page complaint, albeit very dense, publicly available. you can pull the pdf. i'll put it if my social media, as a matter of fact, again, is worthy of every parent's attention. dr. twenge, i look forward to the release of your next book in best and worst social media reooks to today's program and the final result. poll question. in the context of the discovery of the biden documents, did the

current president just give the former president a get out of jail free card? go to smerconish.com and cast a ballot. it not only cleans, it hydrates my skikin. as a dermatologist, i want what's's best for our skin. with 1/4 moisturizing cream, dove is the #1 bar dermatologiststs use at home.

and it's easier than ever to■ get your projects done right. inside, outside, big or small, angi helps you find the right so for whatever you need done. with angi, you can connect with and see ratings and reviews. just search or scroll to see upf on hundreds of projects. and when you book and pay throug you're covered by our happiness it's easy to make your home an a check out angi.com today. angi... and done. when you stay at a vrbo you always get the whole home not part of it but the whole upstairs the whole downstairs the whole fridge and the whole secret nap room because is it really a vacation home if you have to share a house with a host? ♪

only with vrbo if you have this... consider adding this. an aarp medicare supplement insurance plan from unitedhealthcare. medicare supplement plans help by paying some of what medicare doesn't... and let you see any doctor. any specialist. anywhere in the u.s. who accepts medicare patients. so if you have this... consider adding this. call unitedhealthcare today for your free decision guide. ♪

♪ every search you make ♪ ♪ every click you take ♪ ♪ i'll be watching you ♪ - [narrator] the internet doesn't have to be so creepy, the duckduckgo app, lets you search and browse pria blocking most trackers all forf your search history is never tracked, so it can't be shared. and when you leave search, duckduckgo helps keep companies from watching you as you brows. join tens of millions of people making the easy switch by downloading the app today.

duckduckgo, privacy simplified. there it is. the result of this week's poll question at smerconish.com. i get suspicious with round numbers, but okay. let's say 30,000 voted. 60/40 say no, biden did not give trump a get out of jail free card. social media, what came in today? there is this. i see nothing. i bet we won't get any of these tweets on air today, ha ha, gaetz is a terrible person and should resign. you did get it on air. he was the most influential for better or worse person in washington all last week and i am happy he was willing to come here and speak. one more if i have time for it.

what do we have? more social media. smerconish, quit attacking potus for not telling the press everything. the doj was notified at that point no matter who you are, just keep your mouth shut. well, anthony, i think you are on to something. i wonder if the biden white house thought that by quick revelation to the archives and then justice department surrendering the material at the biden center, if that would be the end of it. but when it wasn't the end of it, and when there was another discovery in and the president addressed it he had an obligation to tell us everything. see you next w week. i love my rings but i'll cherish that lunch... forever. the subway series. the grgreatest menu of all tim. for people who are a little intense about hydration. neutrogena® hydro boost lightweigh clinically proven. 48-hr hydration. for that healthy skin glow.

neutrogena®. for people with skin.

get ready to say those five little words. no, not “let me get the pancakes.” or “i'll have all the bacon.” we're talking about... rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity i'm going to get the rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity the rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity i think i'm going to have the rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity yep, it's back. for a limited time. the six dollar rooty tooty fresh 'n fruity combo. 2 eggs, 2 bacon strips, and 2 fruit topped pancakes. only from ihop. download the app and earn free food with every order. introducing the new sleep number climate360 smart bed. only smart bed in the world that actively cools, warms and effortlessly responds to both of you. our smart sleepers get 28 minutes more restful sleep per night. proven quality sleep. only from sleep number.

just look around. this digital age we're living in, it's pretty unbelievable. problem is, not everyone's fully living in it. nobody should have to take a class or fill out a medical form on public wifi

with a screen the size of your hand. home internet shouldn't be a luxury. everyone should have it and now a lot more people can. so let's go. the digital age is waiting.