tv Smerconish CNN April 8, 2023 6:00am-7:01am PDT
6:00 am
anaheim? big time. more guacamole? i'm on a roll-ay. how about you? i'm just visiting. u.s. bank. ranked #1 in customer satisfaction with retail banking in california by j.d. power. now that's 184494200. wellcare medicare. done well, cnn presents a max original heaven skate tomorrow at 10 on cnn. expelled guns, not legislators.
6:01 am
michael smerconish in philadelphia. it's hard not to jump to conclusions about the tennessee state house. the r word it needs to be reserved for clear and convincing cases of prejudice, discrimination or antagonism. against the person or people based on their membership in a racial or ethnic group. after all, there is an appropriate permanence to labeling conduct as racist. but from the outside looking in, this sure does seem to be such a case. three tennessee state legislators who engaged in roughly the same behavior were meted out disparate treatment. just days after 39 year olds and three adults were murdered in a mass shooting at the covenant school in nashville. these legislators led what was described as a disorderly gun reform chant that interrupted house proceedings. there seems to be no debate as to whether they broke the rules. justin jones of nashville, justin pearson of memphis and gloria johnson of knoxville the only difference between the behavior of the three is that jones and pearson used a bullhorn and
6:02 am
johnson did not. the men, freshmen legislators and black johnson, a white woman in her third term, the super majority of 75 republicans in the tennessee legislature initiated expulsion for all three on the grounds that they had broken the rules of decorum. those votes came on thursday, 10 days after the shooter emptied 152 rounds into the covenant school. 66 votes were required to expel the first vote. it pertained to representative jones, and the vote was 72 25 for expulsion. the second vote pertained to johnson, only 65 voted to expel her one vote shy then representative pearson. the vote was 69 26 for expulsion, three less than for jones, but three more than the 66 required so the two black men were expelled, not the white woman. you have to believe that the republicans first counted noses that within their caucus, they knew who
6:03 am
would vote which way they'd anticipated. i imagine that they fall short and expelling the white woman while expelling the black men. the resulting racist perception was therefore entirely predictable. but they did it anyway. also foreseeable was that the votes would turn jones and pearson into martyrs, national names, fundraising magnets and near certainties to be returned to office in a future election. indeed speaking with cnn's jake tapper on friday , gop representative brian ritchie, who only voted to expel jones said he did so. because jones wanted to be expelled. representative jones's office is right next door to mine. i had multiple conversations with him this week. let me know that i wasn't in favor and essentially , he told me that he wanted to be kicked out because his following was growing. he's getting all this national exposure and that the metro city council had already said that they were going to reappointing.
6:04 am
um back to the general assembly , so i was honoring his wishes and voting for him. i respect all three of them and their constituents that voted for them . i felt that they should stay. um, i honored representative jones, but it had nothing to do with race. and as for the other republicans who voted to expel their action will probably be welcomed by red district constituents who will see the votes as a necessary reprimand of bad behavior. as representative richie told jake that of two energetic youthful males who were animated and upholding of the rule of law, notwithstanding that they probably felt otherwise about the breach on the capital on january 6th. all involved pleased their respective constituencies, but energy that should have been directed towards resolving gun violence. maybe ensuring the tennessee pass is a red flag law. well now have been diverted into theatrics used for political self interest. it was all great theater. but nothing changes. i want to know what you think. go
6:05 am
to my website. it's work on it dot com answer this week's poll question who was more undemocratic in tennessee? lawmakers with a bullhorn. or those who voted to expel them here to discuss is jeff greenfield, the five time emmy winning network television analyst who's been at cnn, cbs abc news. he's also an author. he just published this piece for politico. the tennessee expulsion is a glimpse of the future, jeff, welcome back. you say the key to understand here is the power of a supermajority. please explain. we're seeing across the country, the state legislature, which there is a partisan supermajority. and what that has meant is that this one branch of the government with the super majority has been able to undercut the power of other branches of government. and wisconsin. in 2018, the voters elected a democratic governor and attorney general, the
6:06 am
outgoing lame duck republican governor and the legislature vastly decreased the power of the governor and attorney general. we've seen this kind of behavior happening and places like north carolina. when you have a governor of one party and a super legislative majority of another. it means that the normal checks and balances can be overridden. what we're seeing now, some talk of like, i can't believe it. that the newly elected justice in wisconsin, the liberal maybe threatened with impeachment by the republican state senate now has a supermajority if she votes in a way that they feels the wrong gerrymandering on abortion. so more than what happened in tennessee, which is interesting enough. this this, um, political event. growth of partisan super majorities. i think one of the most significant events of the last decade or so. there's a
6:07 am
there's a tendency that i see among those within the acela corridor. i'm certainly one of them to take a look at what just transpired in tennessee and say , well, surely there will be retribution for those republican lawmakers who voted to expel the two black members. not recognizing. i think that they'll probably be well received. those legislators who did cast those ballots when they go back to red districts. that's that's the key to this phenomenon. um, even if statewide. tennessee voters said this this was excessive. this this had real racial animus. these individual legislators are elected from districts that are so red or another cases so blue that they're only threat is on the primary. and so there is no political way to, um, for voters to say we didn't like what you did because of the voters that you're talking about in those districts where these legislators wrong. are probably
6:08 am
all for this. um and you know, in wisconsin. i keep coming back to that because it would meet all the headlines last week. you know, the voters statewide may choose democrats but district by district import. thanks to jerry mandarin, there's no way for democrats to get control of the state assembly, even if statewide, a majority of voters want that to happen, it's just not not the way the situation is laid out. jeff what are the national implications of this? i ask because vice president kamala harris has already made a visit to tennessee, it seems, and the white house has already spoken about what just transpired. it doesn't seem like there's a national republican response at least not yet. yeah. i don't think they're gonna very hard to imagine that mitch mcconnell said he wants to weigh in on this. but what i think you're seeing will make an analogy here. one of the things we learned from the 2022 midterms and from this vote in wisconsin. is that the abortion
6:09 am
issue did have and continues to have a motivating sector among voters. i think the fact that the president spoke to the ousted legislators and that kamala harris was down in tennessee. um means two things. they want to have the conversation about gun violence because after all this all started with this yet another horrific series of shootings and if they can say to their their black constituents all over the country. look what republicans have done. they have the denied. a voice to legislators who represent predominantly black districts. i think for democrats , they want to see this as a motivating factor as we move into the political season. jeff nice to have you back. wish you good things, right? thanks for having me. what are your thoughts hit me up on social media. i'll read some responses throughout the course of the program. what do we have? this comes from the world of twitter. i normally love your poll questions, but this one is just too obvious. of course, the
6:10 am
tennessee legislature was wrong . no issue to debate. you know, i have to confess. i'm kind of cribbing from the wall street journal today because i had three other proposed poll questions and when i saw the headline on the journal editorial on this who's undemocratic. in tennessee. the lawmakers with the bullhorn or those who voted to expel them. i said to myself because i was inclined to agree with you. maybe there is a legitimate debate here, and maybe a significant portion of the audience is going to say, you know, shame on what the youthful energetic men is that what that legislator told jake tapper, so go vote. that's don't be a buzzkill go vote at smerconish .com. this is the whole question of the week. you ready? put it up on the screen. right? who was more on democratic in tennessee lawmakers with a bullhorn or those who voted to expel them. up ahead. to doing decisions by federal judges in texas and washington state on friday set
6:11 am
up a likely supreme court showdown over access to an abortion pill. how might the conservative court over toned roe versus wade rule and in admiral william mcraven illustrious career as many titles included commander of special ops? and overseeing the operation that killed osama bin laden. there is a lesser known honorific that he's equally proud of. bullfrog. i'll ask him to explain. hi i'm stephen singer. yeah, that's right. . te i hate stephen singerr guy. why do my competitors hate me? i'm a nice guy. maybe it's because i've got the best gift for any occasion. picture it a real rose, preserved and deeply dipped in pure 24 karat gold, and it's guaranteed to last a lifetime. my famous 24 karat gold of roses are the perfect way to remember special moments across a lifetime. sounds expensive. nope they started just $59 for yourself and i hate stephen singer .com. stainless
6:12 am
steve maclean's your whole home . oh, yogot to do is pick up the phone. 's not just carpet anymor. it's tile, wood stone really any floor call 1 800 steamer now will clean your home and you'll say wow, i have moderate to severe crohn's disease. now there's sky rizzi. relief control of everything to me. significant symptom relief with sky rizzi, including less abdominal pain and fewer bowel movements at four weeks is the first and only i'll 23 inhibitor for crimes that can deliver both clinical remission and endoscopic improvement. the majority of people on scott tracy achieved long lasting remission at one year. serious allergic reactions and an increased risk of infections or lower ability to fight them may occur. tell your doctor if you have an infection or symptoms, had a vaccine or plan to problems may occur in chrome's
6:13 am
disease. ask your gastroenterologist how you can take control of your crones with sky racing. is everything. learn how abby could help you save. some choose only lost a month project. oh, last 12 weeks nearly three times longer, longer longer. only brevik toe protects from fleas and ticks nearly three times longer than the other choose. that's 12. weeks of protection used with caution and dogs with a history of seizures or neurological disorders, with nearly three times longer protection. why use anything shorter? bravo brevik toe bravo, moderate to severe eczema. it doesn't care if you have a date they off or a double shift. make your move and get out in front of eczema with steroid free. psa pinko, not an injection. pinko is a once daily
6:14 am
pill for those who didn't respond to pass treatments, and it's proven to help provide clearer skin and relieve its fast continuously treat texoma. whether you're flaring or not, can lower your ability to fight infections, including tb before and during treatment. your doctor should check for infections. and do blood tests. tell your doctor if you've had hepatitis b, or c have flu like symptoms or are prone to infections do not take with medicines that prevent blood clots. serious sometimes fatal infections, lymphoma, lung skin and other cancers. serious heart related events and blood clots can happen. people 50 and older with heart disease risk factors have an increased risk of serious heart related events or death with jak inhibitors. it's time to get out in front of eczema. ask your doctor about once daily stabbing co. subway keeps up in the game with the subway series on all star menu, a delicious subs like number four supreme meets black forest ham and jenna wa salami can't stop that much meat. you can only hope to contain it and freshly baked bread subways tasting menu upgrade yet brought
6:15 am
to you by audiobook network. others tell your story producing audio book with us to earn more profits and find a new audience for your published book. produce an audiobook. we handle narration, production and digital distribution 38559. two opposing rulings on abortion pills are pushing the issue back toward the supreme court after the overturn of roe versus wade. within less than an hour last night to judge in texas ruled that the fda approval of an abortion pill should be halted and another judge in washington state ordered the federal government to keep the same drug available in 17 democratic led states and the district of columbia, who had sued to keep access. both the doj and the fda has already appealed the ruling in texas. as the judge gave his seven day pause to his ruling so that the federal government could respond. these cases are destined for the supreme court. joining me now is joan biskupic , cnn senior supreme court analyst and author of the brand new book called nine robes
6:16 am
inside the supreme court's drive to the right and its historic consequences. joan thank you so much for being here. does the court want to have to wade back into abortion so soon after the overturning of roe versus wade? good morning, michael. it's nice to be with you, based on what the slim majority said back on june 24th when they struck down abortion rights. the answer is no. they do not want this still at their court. just consider what justice samuel alito, who wrote for the majority, said it's time to return this issue to the states to elected legislators. hardly it's still with judges, frankly and then brett kavanaugh the key fifth vote in this case. added. this is a moral issue is a policy issue. it should be with the states and one of the things that brett kavanaugh said back in june, when they struck down constitutional abortion rights nationwide was we are not outlawing abortion nationwide. he wanted to make sure that was
6:17 am
clear. but if that texas ruling becomes actually the law of the land effectively, much of abortion will be outlawed nationwide. i have golf. i have the masters on the brain this weekend. i take it therefore, that nobody wants a mulligan. nobody wants a do over. you think that if and when it gets to the supreme court, the lineup will pretty much be the same as it was in the habs case. in the dobbs case, michael? yeah no, it'll be pardon me. i think that it look, you know, you know what i used to say? i used to say they will never overturn roe v. wade and then you know once donald trump got his third appointee on the court, i had had to recalibrate on that. so it's a little difficult to make predictions. but i would say there were five justices who went all the way on roe v. wade with the idea that they were done with it. and that, as brett kavanaugh said, they weren't actually outline nationwide if they get if and when. and they
6:18 am
will michael, get this medication abortion case up there soon, the one from texas i think the votes might be slightly different because it's a different question. consider what's at issue here. it's the authority of the food and drug administration to use its expertise to decide what kind of drugs are on the market. it is not the kind of fundamental questions that they wrestled with last time and i do think there is a chance that you will see. ah, a slightly different rolling here that would allow these pills to still be available for medication. abortion we're within 15 hours of when the ruling came out last night, so i hate to say too much more, but i think the federal government has a much stronger case here where we're at today, michael. okay i'm intrigued. who might who might not line up in their usual spot? if that's the case, so well, this is actually this is easy to game out in some
6:19 am
ways, but, you know, i just want to say we are gaming it out very early. having not seen anything yet of what's going to happen at the first appellate stage, which would be at the fifth circuit, a regional, very conservative appellate court to see what it does, and then we'll get the filings at the supreme court. but that all said okay. i think that someone like brett kavanaugh, who provided the fifth vote to overturn constitutional right to abortion that had existed for nearly 50 years. could allow the federal government to approve this crucial medication abortion drug , which is an issue in the ruling out of texas last night, based on what he said i'm not. i'm not flying blind here. i'm basing it on what he said when he said outright we are not outlawing abortion nationwide. we are leaving into the states. this is this is an issue that should now be in the hands of others and i don't you know, even though justice samuel alito said things like that, also, you
6:20 am
didn't go as far but he said something like that. i would expect that samuel alito might frankly dig in a little bit more and not want to defer to the fda s expertise. but i think that someone like kavanaugh might shift over. just think of what would happen the consequences here two things about the consequences, i think would be important to these justices. they would effectively be ensuring that even states that allow abortion were state legislatures have said. we want the women in our state to be able to end in an unwanted pregnancy. they couldn't get it early stages they wouldn't be able to through a key part of medication abortion, but the other thing that's happened and this goes to the first segment you had on here. just think of what these justices have observed in terms of the fallout from their ruling. they certainly seen a legal fallout, but they've also seen a political fallout. and one of the reasons i used to predict that roe v. wade wouldn't be overturned is that i thought that some justices would be sensitive to what they were doing the way they were
6:21 am
shattering the political landscape as well as the legal landscape. now again, we're very early on but if this single judge in texas is able to be interesting that changes everything nationwide. i think we just have a different kind of rule of law in america. hey i never thought row would be overturned in my lifetime and i was wrong. i'm going to stop saying that, heller, my fingers are actually crossed for this one. i'm going to stop saying that heller won't be overturned because in the aftermath of our first conversation about what just went on in nashville. obviously it's something i'd like to see. joan, that was excellent. thank you so much. thank you, michael. make sure you're voting it smerconish .com and this week's poll question. let's let's prove wrong. that first tweet that said, why are you even asking? it's going to be so lopsided. who was more undemocratic in tennessee lawmakers with a bullhorn or those who voted to expel them still to come. we have learned that after former president
6:22 am
trump was subpoenaed for the documents at mar-a-lago, he allegedly looked through the boxes to choose what he wanted to keep. if special counsel jack smith recommends to indict over . this is his boss, merrick garland required to follow smith's guidance. with h the allegra. we live life our way. allergies don't hold us back starts working two times faster than claritin. and unlike zyrtec , it won't make us drowsy. allegra lasts all day, up to six times longer than benadryl. gives you the fastest 24 hour allergy relief so you can live your greatness. dr shaon klingman, a board certified ob the world's first whole bodymi, deodorant that you can use anywhere. you have odor, but
6:23 am
wish you didn't. it's outrageously affective. check us out and give lumia try today. team. i need a volunteer go promotional products i'm on it makes promotional products success easy for high quality items, go to four imprint .com print for certain. when i was young, my father said, always be excellent. no one may take down an excellent fringe meat. quite a remarkable man. antoinette queen of france point you, chevalier in your place. choice fight is yours. one day whole world. chevallier told true story 13. want to pay only $40 per month with sling tv to watch cnn hd tv msnbc in your other favorite channels from cnn this
6:24 am
morning to my lottery dream home , you can stream it all on sling and save over $800 a year news, true crime, reality tv and much more all with no long term contracts and no hidden fees. over just $40 per month. try sling today at sling .com/ watch now. when you're the leader, disaster cleanup and restoration. how do you make like a never even happened? surf pro like it never even happened. do you own a lot of bras, but not a single one. you really love introducing wireless bras from nick's ultimate comfort and support in sizes up to an h cup .com to find a wireless bra you'll love what brings people to mexico. the food culture. wow i've ever been this excited to eat anything. eva longoria
6:25 am
6:26 am
pizza. not everything can be as smart as little robots hate a little robot and goodbye to scooping the smart appliance that helps without asking. i'm lauren fox on capitol hill. and this is cnn. that's the conclusion of last tuesday's arraignment after former president trump was formally charged by the manhattan district attorney. the judge said he'd see the parties on december four. but that doesn't mean that things will now turn quiet for the former president's legal troubles. many signs suggests that special counsel jack smith is aggressively investigating former president trump for the handling of government documents at mar-a-lago and might be working toward recommending a federal charge for obstruction of justice. the washington post recently reported that the doj and fbi have amassed fresh
6:27 am
evidence pointing to possible obstruction by trump, noting quote in the classified documents case, federal investigators have gathered new and significant evidence that after the subpoena was delivered , trump looked through the contents of some of the boxes of documents in his home, apparently out of a desire to keep certain things in his possession, people familiar with the investigation said. smith's task seems rather binary. did trump break the law and cannot be proven, but in the end, it will be left to the man who appointed jack smith. that would be merrick garland to act upon any recommendation and garland will have at his disposal. prosecutorial discretion. when a g garland appointed jack smith, he said that smith would not be subject to the day to day supervision of any official at doj. but will merrick garland feel obligated to follow smith's recommendation? here's what the code of federal regulations says about the powers of a special counsel. the special counsel shall not be the subject to day
6:28 am
to day supervision of any department of the department. however the attorney general may request that the special counsel provide an explanation for any investigative or prosecutorial step, and may after review concluded that the action is so inappropriate. or unwarranted under established departmental practices that it should not be pursued. in conducting that review. the attorney general will give great weight to the views of the special counsel. well, what exactly does that mean? perhaps that the a g will go along with the special counsel unless he finds such a prosecutorial step to be so inappropriate. or unwarranted under established departmental practices. then again, it says, the a g will give great weight to the special counsel. it does not say the a g is obligated to follow the recommendation. so let's game this out. joining me now is anthony kohli, who formerly served as chief spokesman for the doj and merrick. garland anthony. welcome back. how do you read
6:29 am
that code of regulations? citation that i just referenced thank you, michael. for having me it's good to be with you again. the way i see it, merrick garland is not going to play judge or jury with either of smith's investigations. and don't just take my word for the attorney general himself back in november of last year, said that the special counsel shall exercise his own independent prosecutorial judgment to decide whether charges should be brought. and i think that's important. michael back in november of last year, like i said, i was at doj at the time. the attorney general cited both independence and accountability in making this appointment and i'm really glad that you read from the rags because i think what he was ultimately trying to do was to reassure the american people that both of these two politically sensitive investigations were being conducted free from political interference. you are absolutely right. that smith is not subject
6:30 am
to the day to day supervision of anyone. any political appointee or career pointing for that matter at doj that includes the heads of the criminal division, the national security division and even includes the deputy attorney general and the attorney general. so there's a lot there in those rags. but at the end of the day ah, based on the rags and based what the attorney general himself has said this special counsel will exercise his own independent discretion as to whether charges are brought. bottom line if jack smith recommends indictment of donald trump for obstruction of justice, you expect merrick garland to carry that out so long as his actions are consistent with the norms and practices of the department. i think the rags say that the attorney general would do that. doesn't merrick garland have to take into consideration that the presidential race of 2024 has begun the issue of president biden. similarly i get it. it's
6:31 am
not apples to apples but had classified information in his possession that he should not have. mike pence. former vice president a similar issue. not exact same issue. doesn't merrick garland have to take all that into consideration? so i spent two years at the justice department and what i saw prosecutors there do there was to examine the facts independently based on the facts and the law, so i don't and i think if we want to justice department that is guided by the rule of law, they should be guided by those two things and those two things alone, the facts and the law and in these other extraneous factors as important as they appear to be, i think we wanted justice department that follows two things. the facts in the law, and that's what we've got here based on my experience. what do you think your old colleagues at doj thought about the whole proceeding on tuesday. the arraignment the coverage all of the attention of the nation on the arrest of donald trump the arrangement of donald trump in
6:32 am
connection with the stormy daniels case. i think they've got their hands full. michael you just mentioned you just did an incredible segment on what's happening over across the country in texas with regard to this abortion medication, the attorney general last night, said that as you noted that they would appeal that decision. they've got a lot going on. so i don't know that they the they pay too much attention to what happened up in new york. i will say i would like to use this this one moment michael to make a final point, because i'm not a spokesman for the doj anymore. um and i think i think there is a misconception if you will about some of these special counsel regs, and i do think it would be appropriate for the attorney general to make his case. to explain in a little more detail his approach to the evenhanded administration of justice. he hasn't given a television interview in the last nine months. i think he's
6:33 am
overdue for that he hasn't sat with with cbs or cnn, and it's time for him to talk more directly to the american people about these two investigations, to the extent that he can i agree. hey yeah. you have my phone number. why don't you pass it on to him? i would welcome him here on a on a saturday morning of his choosing. thank you, anthony. i appreciate it. thanks, michael. it's good to be with you. what to remind everybody go answer the poll question. it's for con ish .com. i know too many of you. it's like it's a layup. what do you mean? there's an issue there, at least for some who was more undemocratic. in tennessee, the lawmakers with a bullhorn or those who voted to expel them still to come. jury selection scheduled to begin on thursday. yeah. thursday in the blockbuster defamation lawsuit alleging fox news knowingly lied about voter fraud in the 2020 presidential election, and some familiar fox faces are set to take the stand. will the case really go to trial? or is it
6:34 am
about to settle? f f r e oh, yeh . free get a a free eye e exam n you buy two pairs of glasses starting at just 79 95 booking exam today at america's best .com from tried a true to try somethinnew. so many ways to save life ready wallet happy that's 3 65 by whole foods market, everything from family friendly meals to fit and hold some too quick and easy options like this 25 minute black beans and pepper case idea when it's all said and done. hello fresh always has my back and helping me and my family. busy schedule dot com slash t v 60 for 60% off and free shipping to treat hiv. it's every other month injectable cabin uva for adults who are undetectable cabin. uva is the only complete long acting hiv treatment you can get every
6:35 am
other month helps keep me undetectable. it's who injections given by my health care provider every other month. one less thing to think about what traveling hiv pills aren't on my mind. a quick change of my plans is no big deal. don't receive cabin uva if you're allergic to its ingredients, or if you're taking certain medicines, which may interact with cabin uva serious side effects include allergic reactions, post injection reactions, problems and depression. if you have a rash and other allergic reaction, symptoms, stop cabin uva and get medical help right away. tell your doctor if you have liver problems or mental health concerns, and if you are pregnant breastfeeding or considering pregnancy, some of the most common side effects, including in sight reactions, fever and tiredness. if you switch to cabin uva attend all treatment appointments every other month, and i'm good to go. ask your doctor about every other month. cabin uva. i can't believe this is how you kids talk to your friends. this is talking. did you have a nice day ? look at the size of these butterfly shrimp, enormous
6:36 am
shrimp. what she's talking. this bakery needs new equipment fast to keep up with demand, so they're going to on deck, the online lender that makes it easy to choose your loan and if approved funds as soon as the same day your loan is on deck. ballet studio architecture firm and homemade barbecue sauce called small businesses. but to the people who build them, there's nothing small about them . that's why a t mobile for business you'll save more than 1000. bucks versus verizon and with price lot guarantee will never raise your rate plan so you can keep your focus on toe turn. and making sure the sauce is extra spicy. at t mobile. there are no small businesses. allergies don't have to be scary
6:37 am
. spraying flonase daily gives you long lasting, non drowsy relief loans. all good related. macular degeneration may lead to severe vision loss. and if you're taking a multivitamin alone, you may be missing a critical piece. preservation preservation contains the only clinically proven nutrient formula recommended by the national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced progression. preservation is backed by 20 years of clinical studies your doctor about adding preservation and fill in the missing piece of your plan, like i did with preservation. now with accuse or better absorbing nutrients out here. you're more than just a landowner. you're a gardener. landscape er hunter. because you didn't settle for ordinary same goes for your equipment. versatile powerful durable taboada equipment. more goes
6:38 am
into it, so you get more out of it. jury selection begins in third on thursday and dominion voting systems $1.6 billion defamation lawsuit against fox news will fox settled before it goes to trial on april 17. and either way will their viewers ever hear anything about the emails and texts revealed by those in charge of the network didn't believe what it was actually airing dominion is accusing the network of knowingly and repeatedly airing falsehoods. about its voting machines rigging the 2020 election in favor of joe biden. among those who are set to take the stand the network's most prominent hosts like sean hannity and tucker carlson, and high ranking executives, including 92 year old chairman rupert murdoch, himself. joining me now is lee levine. he's a veteran first amendment lawyer who in his long career represented both fox and cnn. he's argued before the supreme court. cnn still uses his former
6:39 am
firm, and he wants represented me years ago. lee nice to see you again. actual malice. that's an awfully high bar, knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, but this case seems to be capable of meeting it. you agree. absolutely said this from the very first. longer case of actual mallets than this one against the media and the date. a lot of the deposition testimony, the texts and the emails behind the scenes has come to light in media coverage of the pleadings. can that be imputed to the company at large ? can the company be held accountable for what tucker carlson may have said to a colleague. well, you know, that's the very interesting thing michael about the judge's decision last week, allowing the case to go to trial. the judge basically said that that's an issue for the jury, which means that dominion can put into evidence all of that stuff about
6:40 am
all of those people and will be up to the jury to decide. whether or not any of it is relevant to fox as an entity, state of mind with respect to knowledge of falsity, a reckless disregard of the truth. you know this as well as i do. that is a tremendous boon for dominion. can the defendant in this case fox news wrap themselves in opinion. can they sell? what? we were just this was an item of news interest and we were putting someone on air to express their opinion. we didn't necessarily buy into it. they cannot. the judge took that argument by fox off the table in his decision that was released last week, so the jury is going to be instructed that fox broadcast false statements of fact, about dominion that were defamatory, the only issue in this regard before the jury is whether or not fox published it with knowledge of falsity or
6:41 am
reckless disregard of the truth. and who at fox. whose state of mind with respect the truth or falsity as relevant. those are really the only issues other than damages that the jury is going to be asked to decide. if you were defending the case, what would you be leading with? that's really tough. i think that i would be leading with trying to blow holes in the connecting dots between the various people who said things about sidney powell being not sir rudy java. giuliani being crazy or not believing the truth and what the line producers and the hosts new at the time. but given the evidence, it's in the case. it's going to be hard to blow holes in that line. so if i were defense lawyer handling this case, i wouldn't i would be really worrying about what i could do by way of defense. it
6:42 am
sounds to me like you'd be recommending you'd be laying out the pluses and minuses but perhaps recommending that they settle yeah, i would. if i were asked for a recommendation. i would recommend settlement. i'm surprised that the case has not settled so far. i'm surprised it didn't settle before fox had to produce all of these emails and texts that have now become public. i'm surprised they didn't settle after the briefing went, all of this was played out to the public. my only thought now is that they're waiting for jury selection. to see what kind of jury they draw and whether they feel comfortable that there are at least person or two on that jury who might not be interested in ruling against fox . that's the only thing i can think of that process scheduled to begin on thursday. lee levine, thank you so much nice to see you. great to see you, too. michael, take care. checking in on social media reaction. what do we have? fox
6:43 am
should be required by the jury to admit to their viewers how fox deceived them. this requirement should preface the beginning of every tv segment that airs on fox hour by hour day. you raise citizen gen. you raise a very interesting question, which is, you know, if a tree falls in the forest is the fox view viewer even going to know about this case has gotten extensive publication in the media, but it doesn't get discussed at all. on fox news, even if the case is to resolve with a big check being written, which i anticipate, will their viewers be any the wiser and by the way in some far right media quarters, they have not even taking the lesson from the judge who used all caps and explaining that there is absolutely no basis for any of that, which was said about dominion. in other words, people are not learning the lesson at least yet from what has come out in this case still to come. speaking of lessons, what are the lessons in leadership that we can all learn from a retired navy seal bullfrog who also oversaw the
6:44 am
raid on osama bin laden? admiral william mcraven joins me to discuss his latest book. he's here next. invited women who wanted their damamaged hair trimmed. yes i need a trip. just want to be able to o cut the damage of instead. so stitill nd that trim. i'm actually shocked . i don't need a haircut. don't trim daily damage. stop it th dove known as a passionate artist known for loving the everyone together. no one wants to be known for cancer treatment can be keytruda is known to treat cancer. fda approved for 16 types of cancer, including certain early stage cancers. one of those cancers is triple negative breast cancer keytruda may be used with chemotherapy medicines, has treatment before surgery and then continued alone after surgery when you have early stage breast cancer and are at high risk of it, coming
6:45 am
back, can cause your immune system to attack healthy parts of your body during or after treatment. this may be severely to death your doctor right away if you have cough, shortness. breath chest pain, diarrhea, severe stomach pain, severe nausea, vomiting. headache light sensitivity problems, irregular heartbeat, extreme tiredness, constipation, dizziness or fainting changes in appetite, thirst or urine, confusion, memory problems, muscle pain or weakness, fever, rash, itching or flushing. there may be other side effects. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions, including immune system problems if you've had or planned to have an organ or stem cell transplant. received chest radiation or have a nervous system problems is an immunotherapy is also being studied in hundreds of clinical trials, exploring ways to treat even more types of cancer. it's true true from merck, see all the types of cancer keytruda is known for keytruda .com and ask your doctor. if keytruda could be right for you think you know ron desantis. think again. in congress, desantis voted three
6:46 am
separate times to cut social security. that's right three times over three years worse, desantis voted to cut medicare two times descendants even voted to raise the retirement age to 70. the more you learn about desantis, the more you see he doesn't share our values. he's just not ready to be president. make america great again. incas responsible for the content of this advertising. ego the number one rated brandon cordless outdoor power brings you the world's first power load string trimmer line. i q so smart. it loads the line automatically with line i. q there's no bumping so you can work faster exclusively at lowe's ace and ego. authorized dealers get refunds dot com powered by innovation, refunds can help your business get a payroll tax refund even if you got p p p it takes eight minutes to qualify. i went on their website uploaded everything, and i was blown away by what they could do. refunds dot com is help businesses get over a billion dollars and we
6:47 am
6:48 am
now that's 184494200. wellcare medicare. done well. natasha chen in los angeles and this is cnn. what separates a good leader from the rest of the pack my next guest, no stranger to the risks and challenges good leaders face every day. retired admiral william mcraven served nearly 40 years as a navy seal. he advised presidents george w. bush and barack obama and oversaw the most elite combat operations, including the rate of osama bin laden. he's also a new york times bestselling author. he's got a brand new book, it's called the wisdom of the bullfrog leadership made
6:49 am
simple but not easy. his book is already on the best seller listed amazon. admiral haven great to have you back on the program. bullfrog is not only the title of your book, but a title you once held. what is that? yeah. thanks michel. good to be with you. yes the bullfrog is the title given to the longest serving navy seal on active duty. remember, first and foremost as navy seals. we are navy frogman from our world war two frogman roots. so when you are the senior frogman, you are the bullfrog. do you get anything more than bragging rights? i imagine you never have to buy a beer for yourself. if everybody knows like you're the frogman. i think the hard part of it is when you're the bullfrog. you've got to buy all the beers. the book is broken down comprised of 18 different short chapters. they are models . they are creeds. they are parables, which one most guides your life. you know the very
6:50 am
first chapter is entitled death before dishonor, and it sounds a little course. maybe but this really goes back to the days of caesar. and of course, the united states marine corps has kind of informally adopted this , but the idea being that honor is important. integrity is important. duty is important. the things that we want out of our leaders are things that we should expect. we should expect them to be men and women of integrity. we should expect them to be honorable. we should expect them to be respectful. i don't think that's too much to ask from our leaders. and the fact of the matter is when you have leaders that don't display these qualities. they may build, you know, billion dollar industries, but sooner or later , that's going to be a house of cards, and it may tumble if you don't have leaders with great character and great integrity, so i think this is the single most important quality. you were the commander of the raid that
6:51 am
took out osama bin laden as i mentioned in your introduction that was may one of 2011. maybe that's why i was drawn to the chapter, which is titled who dares wins? tell me about chris farris. and please paint that picture. yes so my senior enlisted when i was the commander of this special operations unit was a command sergeant major, chris faris and chris had been in combat since he was about 18 years old as an army special operator, and so as we were preparing to go on the mission as the seals were preparing to go on the mission myself and sergeant major ferris went out to meet them right before they boarded the helicopter. so if you can imagine 24 seals kind of all up, ready to go there around the fire pit they've got their game face on, and it was time for me and sergeant major ferris to say a few words and i asked chris to speak first. and, of course, the seals around the fire pit had tremendous respect for chris because they knew his military heritage if you will. and he got
6:52 am
up there and he said, gentlemen, he said, you know, we're about to go on this incredibly important mission. remember the saying of our british counterparts who dares wins and the implication is, if you are going to dare greatly if you have an important mission, you're going to have to take great risks, and this was the time to take great risk. caveat that by saying. every time you have a have to take a great risk . you need to make sure it is a calculated risk that you are working all of the wrist out of it as much as possible, so the men or the women can do their job. but this saying who dares wins is important. i think for every commando and for frankly every person trying to achieve something great. i'm going to bring you from the pinnacle of your career to the beginning of your career and mcraven need you to build a frog float. what am i, referring to? yeah, when i was brand new in underwater demolition team 11. it was the first team i was at. i had i was
6:53 am
out on a training exercise and somebody comes and grabs me and says the commanding officer wants to speak with you. well, the commanding officer was the guy in charge. i'm the new guy at the team, and i'm excited. okay he obviously wants me to go on some special mission. maybe i'm going to save the world so go back over. i get into his office and he starts off by saying well, mr mcraven. i've been hearing good things about you. so i kind of swell with pride, you know, and he says, you know, the chief petty officers think you're a terrific incentive thinking great. here it comes, he says, so we've got an important operation for you to do, he says. the fourth of july is coming up and i need someone to build the frog float. and of course, i pause for a second. i didn't quite understand, and he said, you know, frog float, you know, float in the parade. and of course i said, yes, sir. and i left the commanding officer's office and i went back to the locker room. and, you know, i'm kind of feeling sorry for myself. i expected to go on some big mission and he wants me to build this frog float and there was an old master chief master chief petty officer nearby and
6:54 am
he kind of saw me sulking and he said, what's wrong? anderson said. well master chief, you know, the commanding officer wants me to build a frog flirt. and the mass chief said, well, let's and i've been in this business a long time. and let me tell you something. a lot of times you're going to be asked to do things that you think are important, but that are important for the unit. so you go out there and build the best frog float you can and it was a great lesson and we have a picture. we have the admiral, i'm sure i'm showing the picture of the frog float in coronado there, it's a hell of a frog flow. yeah it was. it was a big frog float, but the lesson was sometimes even as a leader. you've got to do things that you think are beneath your stature do, um and do them well. the book's great the wisdom of the bullfrog. nice to have you back. always good to be with you, michael. thank you. still to come more of your best and worst social media comments, and the final result of this week's poll question its work on it .com you've still got a chance to go vote. who was more undemocratic in tennessee lawmakers with a
6:55 am
bullhorn or those who voted to expel them. in two seconds. eric will realize they'rere going to need more space to sell the house, open houses or sell with confidence to open door. request a cash offer. open door .com. i wish you could get the feeling of a relaxing foot masge just by walkinground now you c with new sketches, massag bit footwear. the unique way of tenology is designed to gently massage your foot with every step and are machine washable. keep your feet happy all day long with new sketches. massage fit high. i'm stephen singer. yeah that's right. the i hate stephen singer guy. don't you hate giving a bad gift when you catch that look of disappointment in their eyes. roses are a nice gift, but they end up in the trash a week later. what if you could give her a real rose? that would last forever? my famous 24 karat gold dipped roses that last a lifetime. it's a real rose in real gold for your real love, starting at just 59 bucks what
6:56 am
are now with free shipping to receive in time for mother's day only, and i hate stephen singer dot com. moderate to severe eczema still disrupts my skin despite treatment disrupts my skin with it disrupts my skin rash. but now i can disrupt eczema with invoke invoke is not a steroid topical or injection. it's one pill once a day, many taking her invoke, saw clear, almost clear skin while some saw up to 100% clear skin and dramatic and fast relief, some as early as two days. that's revoke relief and lower your ability to fight infections, including tb, serious infections and blood clots, some fatal cancers, including lymphoma and skin, cancer, death, heart attack, stroke and tears in the stomach. her intestines occurred . people 50 and older with at least one heart disease. risk factor have higher risks don't take if allergic to invoke as serious reactions can occur. tell your doctor if you are or may become pregnant. disrupt the itch and rash eczema. talk to
6:57 am
your doctor about invoke learn how abby can help you save will live forever. no it's literally never crossed my mind. we live to like 100. that's 35 years of being retired. i don't want to outlive our money and i've been eating all these stupid chia seeds could totally live to be 100. i keep thinking good care of myself since we started working with empower were able to get all our financial questions answered. so we don't have to worry. so you never never join 17 million people and take control of your financial future to empower what's next start today to empower .com there's always a fresh deal on the subway app like this. 1 50% off that deals so good. we don't even need an eight time all started telling you about it. wait, what it before it's gone on the subway out. we need a small business loan fast. i got this loan falcon. there's a better way to get a fast small
6:58 am
business loan on deck .com. and if approved, get your funds as soon as the same day your loan is on deck. good morning, everyone we do begin with breaking news. joining us now are two lawmakers from different sides of the aisle also live in ukraine. i'm dr sanjay gupta and this is ready to go online! any questions? yeah, i got one: how about the best network imaginable? let's invent that! that's what we do here. quick survey. who wants their internet to work pretty much everywhere? and it needs to run smooth, like, super, super, super, super smooth. hey, should you be drinking that? it's decaf. 'cause we're busy women... we don't have time for lag or buffering, right? who doesn't want internet that helps ai do your homework even faster? come again? -sorry, what was that? uhhhhh... the next generation 10g network. only from xfinity. the future starts now.
6:59 am
fabrics. floyd sectional is designed for how you live today and in the future the all of our furniture at home dot com longoria searching for mexico tomorrow at nine on cnn. hey, there's the result of this week's poll question. it's my god 91 2 i get. i guess the first tweet that i responded to was right who was more undemocratic and tennessee nearly 40,000 votes. those who voted to expel as compared to lawmakers with a bullhorn, quick social media reaction. we don't have time for much. by the way, keep voting. i'll leave the question up all day. how is fighting to keep children alive in their classrooms? undemocratic without protest? i wouldn't be able to vote says overeducated af look. everybody
7:00 am
played a role is what i'm trying to say. i'm not equating the two don't misunderstand. i'm just framing the issue. i'm not equating the two, but i am acknowledging that everybody played a role here. i mean, representative richie said he voted to oust representative jones. he said this in his interview with jake tapper because representative jones wanted to be thrown out. recognizing the value politically speaking that would come from being expelled so each was serving their respective constituency. one more real quick. here it comes. this is such a lawless such a lawlessness in this country when our elected representatives think they can take over any proceeding just by being the loudest because they should be chastised and removed. okay, we're all hide. my god, you're part of the 9% there, there's someone speaking for those who wanted ouster. keep voting. subscribe to the newsletter. when you're there, i'll see you next week. happy easter.
158 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CNN (San Francisco)Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1414835202)