and i guess he landed in my back yard. >> we had a military jet crash. i'm the pilot. we need to get rescue rolling. i'm not sure where the airplane is. >> so it would take more than a full day to find where that $100 million aircraft went down. the cause of the crash remains under investigation. and some good news for you tonight. a 2-year-old girl is back safe with her family after police said she walked barefoot three miles into the woods with two family dogs. michigan state police put out requests for drones, search and rescue and k9 teams. neighbors formed a search party. and she was found, sleeping off a wooded trail using one of the dogs as a pillow. police reportedly said the second dog, a rottweiler, was in, quote, guardian mode. and isn't she just so preciously cute? we are so happy that she's fine. and thank you so much for joining us. "cnn primetime" with abby

phillip starts now. tonight, a sitting united states senator is accused of using his official position to help a foreign power in exchange for sxrichz rewards. and while the allegations of cash, the gold bars, even the convertibles are getting all the attention, the other end of those alleged bribes is downright chilling. geeng. i'm abby phillip. the justice department indicting democratic senator bob menendez and his wife and his wife. that he sought and received sensitive information about u.s. diplomats in egypt. information that eventually made its way to people with ties to the government there. now, in addition prosecutors say that he gave non-public information about u.s. military aid. he's also accused of

ghost-writing a pitch to senators on behalf of a foreign government. now, that would ease restrictions on arms and ammunition to egypt. those restrictions were in place in part due to concerns about human rights and democracy. all of this as he is chairing the senate foreign relations xhirkts one of the most powerful positions in the entire government. these schemes allegedly ended with stacks of cash, more than a dozen gold bars, help on mortgage payments, a mercedes-benz convertible, and you're seeing right there pictures of the evidence. but the timeline is important and also stunning here. this alleged conduct started not long after menendez escaped conviction on previous bribery charges when a jury deadlocked, but also it allegedly began around the same time that he said this about then president donald trump. >> the american people deserve to know who they elected to be

their president. they deserve to know if he's in fact putting america's interests first. they deserve to know if donald trump is wittingly or unwittingly an agent for the russian federation. congress must carry out its constitutional duty to fully and thoroughly investigate where the facts lead. >> tonight, the pressure is mounting. the number of democrats calling on him to resign is growing. both from congress and his home state of new jersey. but menendez is maintaining his innocence. he says his ethnicity is to blame. "those who believe in justice believe in innocence until proven guilty. i intend to continue to fight for the people of new jersey with the same success i've had for the past five decades." this is the same record of success these very same leaders have lauded all along. it is not lost on me how quickly some are rushing to judge a latino and push him out of his seat. i am not going anywhere."

as for the man in charge of the united states senate, chuck schumer is praising menendez's work, says he is temporarily stepping down from the foreign relations committee, and he says menendez has a right to due process and a fair trial. that may be so, but many of his fellow democrats aren't as forgiving, including my next guest, joining me now, new jersey democrat steven full op. mayor of jersey city, also a candidate for new jersey governor in 2025. mayor, thanks for joining us. you are now a part of this growing chorus of democrats calling on senator menendez to resign. what did you find to be the most damning allegation in the indictment against him? >> i mean, i think your intro was pretty spot-on. if you read the indictment, i mean, it was 40 pages. it read like a movie script. it was really hard to kind of take in from dna on money and

gold bars and of course cars and then giving information to the egyptian government. it was kind of really kind of a salacious 40 pages. and you know, it makes it really hard to say that everything in there is not true. maybe bob menendez or senator menendez could defend some of it. it would be really tough to say every component of that is defensible, if any of it. >> tonight senator menendez is pushing back on calls to resign. he says, as we read, "it's not lost on me how quickly some are rushing to judge a latino and push him out of his seat." he also says he's not going anywhere. what do you make of that? that suggestion that he's making there that this is about his ethnicity, trying to push out the highest-ranking latino in the senate. >> i mean, i think any reasonable person knows it's not about his ethnicity. but if you also know bob menendez, he's a tough guy. he's not going to bow down to any amount of pressure.

that's unfortunate. the pressure's going to build. but it's not in his dna to resign. so absent the senate taking action, you know, i think he's going to dig in. and you know from a democrat standpoint it's really hard to be critical of indictments that surround former president trump or be critical of clarence thomas and then at the same time from a senate standpoint not take aggressive action against bob menendez with the same sort of allegations. >> all right. mayor steven fulop, thank you so much for joining us tonight. >> thank you. >> and let's continue this conversation here with former special assistant to the president, president biden, michael larosa. also with us republican strategist shermichael singleton, cnn political analyst laura barron lopez and former federal prosecutor joseph moreno. joseph, i want to start with you here. as the mayor just said, it really does read like a movie script. meeting a girlfriend, marrying

her quickly after, and she just happens to have contacts who are close to the egyptian government that then are seeking information from a sitting united states senator. how strong do you think this indictment is? >> gold bars, wads of cash, a mercedes convertible? tawdry, absolutely. but tawdry does not always equal illegal. and the supreme court has made it pretty difficult to bring these bribery cases against elected officials. you need not a just quid pro quo, you need an official act, an exercise of governmental power. a vote on something, approval of a policy. when i go through basically those four kinds of conspiracies that senator menendez is accused of, i see holes in at least two of them. >> but what about providing that information? according to the allegations, he received -- he sought information from the united states government that was nonpublic and provided it to these contacts who then passed it along to the government. >> unclassified but sensitive, absolutely. but he's not facing espionage

charges. maybe he should be, but they're not in there. again, it looks really bad, optics are horrible here. but as defense counsel, i can definitely poke some holes in this. >> michael? >> i think one of the things i noticed today, it was a very splashy presentation. sometimes i think -- i'm not a lawyer, but from a communications perspective, it seems as though when prosecutors make these kinds of large presentations before the media, sometimes it seems like their cases might be weaker than perhaps we think they are and are trying to argue their case in the public opinion instead and that's why they're doing the visual presentations. >> i mean -- go ahead. >> no, i was going to say, i don't think that the seat will be competitive from a political perspective. whether he should resign or not, you know, i think -- what's funny about my party is, we quickly fall apart, whereas the other party tends to fall in line pretty quickly. we have no problem throwing each

other under the bus, eating our young. it seems like republicans stick with each other. >> look, i hear what you guys are saying. but again, just a normal person reading this document, what it sounds like he's being accused of doing is taking money, almost $500,000 in cash, in exchange for providing information -- actually, even acting to facilitate the interests of a foreign government. >> there's no doubt it looks terrible. but should he be held to a different standard when it comes to running for office than santos or donald trump? >> well, actually, that's exactly the question. >> that's a fair critique, but i would say as someone who had a top-secret clearance, i've gone through that process, this has been a one-year investigation. this guy's the chair of the foreign relations committee. the second most prestigious, one of the most powerful senate committees that's over foreign relations for this entire country. and he's essentially acting as a foreign agent against the interests of the united states.

now, look, i agree george santos is a problem, and republicans should have expelled him from the house. but i expect democrats, including the president, to speak to this. because if this were a republican, i would argue that the expectation would be for republicans to speak out against that individual. >> how, if you are senator schumer, would you be able to say that george santos, for example, should leave the house and not say that the chairman of the senate foreign relations committee, who's under this kind of investigation, should not be in that post? >> that's exactly why i think you're seeing so many democrats, in particular new jersey democrats -- the governor of new jersey, but also a number of menendez's colleagues in the house that are saying he has to go, he has to resign. because -- even one of his former colleagues, tom malinowski, who used to serve in the state department, said, how can we as a party be calling for donald trump, say that donald trump is not fit for office, but then not call for the

resignation of menendez? it doesn't look as though it will be sustainable position from schumer to not speak out more aggressively on this matter. >> he's also now bringing in the fact that he's the highest-ranking latino in the senate. >> his state is 22% latino. he has a huge base of support. this is like a kennedy in massachusetts. >> abby, i would say that's like clarence thomas all of a sudden saying, but i'm the black guy on the supreme court. i'm not exactly sure how much room he has to maneuver by saying, i'm the senior latino in the united states senate. i think this puts democrats in a very precarious political predicament. they've gone after donald trump under the idea donald trump would somehow sell the secrets of the united states to any highest bidder. and here you have bob menendez, the chairman of the foreign relations xhicommittee, essentiy selling secrets to a foreign entity, at least acting in the interests of a foreign entity.

i think democrats have to address this. >> help me understand this. sounds like you're saying, generally speaking, unless he took a vote for the egyptian government, he can accept hundreds of thousands of dollars in gold bars, he can accept $500,000 in cash, in exchange for facilitating their interests informally? almost like a lobbyist would, from the halls of the united states senate. is that what you're saying? >> don't get me wrong, i'm horrified by this -- >> i'm just asking. i think that's kind of what it sounds like you're saying. >> if you're looking at it purely legalistic, it has to be an official act. throughout the indictment you'll see that term peppered all throughout. it doesn't mean they can prove that beyond a reasonable doubt. setting up meetings, making phone calls, right? establishing goodwill in terms of a relationship. those are not official acts. >> sharing staff details about a u.s. embassy in egypt? that's not -- >> it's wrong, but it's not part of his job as being a senator.

making votes, making nominations. maybe putting a hold on foreign aid. now that's a good one -- >> he's using his role as a senator to access that information. if he were just a regular joe, he would not have access to that. >> that's right, this is the loophole. this is the bob mcconnell from virginia or bob menendez several years ago. that's why they couldn't get him the last time. if they can drive through the same holes that prevented the doj from getting him the first time around. >> but even if that is the case, shouldn't we have standards about ethics in this country? whether it's a republican or democrat, i think the american people have the expectation that our elected officials serve our interests, not their own interests, let alone the interests of a foreign country. and that appears to be what mend ez -- >> do you think, laura, this is going to be on the issue for trump -- the central issue for democrats with trump is law and order. can they make that argument with this sitting right in front of them with bob menendez? >> i think given the speed of how many new jersey democrats

including the governor have come out to say that he should resign, that as soon as lawmakers come back next week, they'll be back by tuesday, the democrats are going to be peppered with questions in the senate about -- >> the president will too. >> the president will as well. and i think that we are going to see more and more democrats start to say he should resign. . >> these seats don't come up often in massachusetts, new jersey. the governor would probably love to run for that seat and spend his own money. millions of dollars rung for sflat the way he did for governor. several people who've been in congress for decades want that seat. >> i imagine they also want that seat becausemen dez has been indicted twice in the last decade and it seems -- >> but you know what, they spent $30 million against him after the last one and he still won by 12 points. now he's running in a presidential year. >> this may help him. >> who knows? stranger things have happened,

guys. interesting conversation. we'll continue to follow this story. thank you, everyone. coming up next for us tonight, we are now seven days away from a government shutdown. next i'll speak live with one of the republicans at war with house speaker kevin mccarthy about the path forward. congressman matt gaetz joins me live next. plus why the mayor of dallas is changing his party affiliation from democrat to republican and the chilling words now that we are hearing from the former trump aide cassidy hutchinson, who testified about what happened to her in washington after january 6th. >> i could not go back to my apartment. i ended up moving down to atlanta for several months. free & gentle. ide s it cleans better, and doesn't leave behind irritating residues. and it's gentle on her skin. tide free & gentle is epa safer choice certified. it's got to be tide.

hello 12 hours of relief. 12 hours!! not coughing? hashtag still not coughing?! mucinex dm gives you 12 hours of relief from chest congestion and any type of cough, day or night. mucinex dm. it's comeback season.

my brain. so i choose new neuriva ultra. unlike some others, it supports 7 brain health indicators, including mental alertness from one serving. to help keep me sharp. try new neuriva ultra. think bigger. every day, more dog people, and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. they're quitting the kibble. and kicking the cans. and feeding their dogs dog food that's actually well, food. developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door. it's smarter, healthier pet food.

get 50% off your first box at thefarmersdog.com/realfood you're looking at live pictures of capitol hill where the clock is really ticking on a potential government shutdown. it's just now seven days away and time is of the essence. except that most members are now nowhere in sight. they were sent home for the week without a clear plan after conservative hardliners once again scuttled kevin mccarthy's plans. one of those hardliners, congressman matt gaetz, joins me now. thanks for being here, congressman. >> absolutely, thanks for having me, abby. >> i should note you are still on the hill. so i'll take that as a sign that perhaps things are moving forward. but i have to ask you, because this is starting to come to a head here. if speaker mccarthy puts a

continuing resolution on the floor to keep the government open for 30 days, is that enough in your mind to force a vote to kick him out of his job? >> i gree with many of my colleagues who say if speaker mccarthy embraces a clean continuing resolution to continue the spending policies of nancy pelosi and joe biden that would most likely trigger a motion to vacate. remember, i gave a speech last week detailing multiple areas where kevin mckarcarthy has breached his agreement with house conservatives. there was a big thrust of that that was the spending commitments but also a vote on term limits, a vote on a balanced budget amendment, release of the january 6th tapes. these are things kevin mccarthy promised. he hasn't done these things. we need to hold him to account. there are meetings happened. i just left a meeting with congressman biggs about the finer points of our department of homeland security appropriations bill. we have a rule being drafted right now so that we can apass appropriations bills for our military, department of homeland security, for our agriculture

priorities and also the department of state and foreign ops. so those bills will have a good amalgamation of policy and spending cuts, and i think it will put our country on better fiscal footing. >> do you have enough support to actually take away mccarthy's gavel? >> well, that depends on the democrats. i saw in an interview this morning that democrat whip catherine clark said if democrats were to bail out speaker mccarthy they would require concessions. and that should trouble a lot of republicans because if we have a republican speaker who is working for the democrats because they're the ones who bailed him out then i doubt we'll be able to make much progress for the voters who elected us. >> but i'm asking actually -- what i'm really asking is what's the plan b? if not mccarthy then who? you? >> no. i don't want to be speaker. but i do know we have a very talented group of members. it's a little uncomfortable to discuss right now because our number two who would be naturally someone we would look to is right now getting

treatment for blood cancer and is not with us. we hope he has a full fast recovery and would be right back into our leadership structure. our number three is tom emmer. he's our whip. he's got a lot of credibility across different sections of the conference. but getting rid of mccarthy if he has failed us for eight months, if he has delayed the appropriations process, as even his allies conceded earlier this evening in the rules committee, then getting rid of him is sort of an end unto itself because it shows that we've got the ability to pivot, make a boaterbetter c and go forward and actually deliver. >> but how is getting rid of mccarthy an end unto himself. if you get rid of him but you can't elect a replacement who will do what you want them to do, that seems to kind of defeat the purpose. do you have the votes, do you think, to elect someone who in your view would be better than mccarthy? >> oh, sure. i think that if we were backing a speaker contest there are any number of people who would be able to assemble a coalition -- >> there weren't the last time

around. there weren't the last time around. >> right. but we've had eight months of experiences that inform how we think about these things. eight months ago kevin mccarthy hadn't broken the series of promises that he made at that time. eight months ago kevin mccarthy hadn't stalled the appropriations process. i mean, a democrat from colorado, joe neguse, made excellent points today haranging some of the republicans in the rules committee saying gosh, if the border's such a priority and if the appropriations committee had a border funding bill in the summer, why did more than 100 days pass before kevin mccarthy put that legislation on the floor? we don't really have good answers to those questions other than the fact that it's always the parlance in washington to just wait until the very end and then jam all these bills together and get one up or down vote on funding the entire government. that is the way we have run since the mid '90s. and i'm trying to break the fever and liberate us from those up or down votes and get to

single-subject spending bills. it's an idea even folks on the left support because it leads to more transparent, honest and open government. >> so congressman, a number of your republican colleagues say that they're at a loss for understanding your strategy. listen to what they had to say. >> what are you asking for? you know, we need to pass appropriations -- okay, we're trying to pass an appropriations bill. you won't let us do that. so stop voting with democrats. i think everybody's just confused because there's not rational explanations on the opposition. >> at the end of the day any final bill is going to be bipartisan. and if somebody doesn't realize that, they're truly clueless. >> i understand what you're saying, that you want to take this bill by bill. but the question is how will you do that in the next seven days in a bipartisan way that will end up with something that is the law of the land? >> there's no doubt that we are behind in the house of representatives because we are poorly led. but to my friend and colleague

dan crenshaw he probably should have watched your program ten days ago when i laid out exactly what we want. a vote on term limits. a vote on a balanced budget amendment. and then single-subject spending bills. now, we've been dilatory and delayed in that, and it was frustrating to me, abby, that yesterday 3:00 on a thursday kevin mccarthy sent everybody home as if we're operating in the french workweek. we should be starting at 7:00 in the morning, finishing at midnight and getting our work done. there are members from across the congress and across the republican conference who are here doing that. but we are doing that in spite of our poor leadership, certainly not because of it. and to my friends and colleagues i would say pretty simple. we want a vote individually on these appropriations bills and we will not tolerate them being lumped together. >> i think a lot of americans would agree they'd like to see folks working through the weekend to resolve this before there's a government shutdown. but i wonder, don't you think it is reasonable for members -- i

mean, you heard mike lawler there talking about a bipartisan fashion. don't you think it is reasonable for them to work on the other side of the aisle if it means avoiding a shutdown that can actually hurt americans including thousands of your constituents? >> no doubt. and mike lawler's right. the final solution in divided government always has to be bipartisan. but the question is what platform and what paradigm do we use to engage that negotiation? i believe that we should negotiate each agency of government and each appropriation bill separately so that we get to a programmatic level of analysis. what i disagree with is the notion that we should start with the premise that we just fund everything the way it's been going the prior year whether it's worked or not, whether it's exceed its expended -- expected distributions of funds or not. you see, that just leads to more of the same. it's actually precisely the reason that we are $33 trillion in debt facing $2 trillion

annual deficits. we cannot go on as a country that's spending $7 trillion and bringing in 5 trillion. so i hope we -- >> i understand -- >> -- we get bipartisan agreement to reduce spending. >> i understand what you're saying good the spending levels. but how do we get from point a to point b? from where we are right now which seems to be chaos to a point where there's a solution and the government's not shut down. in a week. this could have real impacts on a lot of federal workers. people who are working without pay. military service members who are actually in the line of fire right now. in harm's way right now. are you confident that this will not have -- a shutdown will not have a national security impact on this country in addition to the economic impact that it will have? >> well, we have endured shutdowns before, and while they're certainly not helpful and they do bring pain upon americans who've done nothing wrong to lead us to that moment, we're at a moment right now where we have to take the bold action to break the fever, to

stop governing by omnibus and continuing resolution. i am not certain that we are going to avoid a shutdown. but a shutdown of maybe, you know, 10 or 11 or 12 days certainly is different than a shutdown that would span multiple pay periods for federal employees -- >> what do you -- >> let me make this -- >> what is the longest you would go in a shutdown? >> well, i don't want to go at all. and i certainly think that the sooner we could get the government funded the better. but there's a reason why we put the defense appropriations bill and the homeland security appropriations bill first, because we want to be able to say as house republicans that we moved options for the senate and democrats to negotiate with us on the military spending bill so that our troops are paid and on the homeland security bill so that we pay our border patrol and i.c.e. so that there is a reason why we have prioritized some of our bravest and most valued fellow americans in what we're putting forward to fund. and if democrats and senators have ideas on those things, we'd like to negotiate them. we're just not going to negotiate through the context of

how washington has always worked with continuing resolutions and omnibus bills. >> i should note that you did vote against the defense appropriations bill this week that -- >> no, i didn't. >> the rule to -- >> abby, this is going to be a very embarrassing moment when the internet corrects you on this. i voted for the defense rule both times. >> well, i stand corrected. congressman, appreciate you joining us tonight. thank you so much. >> thank you. >> and coming up next, the mayor of dallas is leaving the democratic party to join republicans. i'll speak live with the head of the dallas democratic party, who will respond to that. plus, melinda french gates joins me on health care, on the strikes, and on criticisms of vice president kamala harris. >> i think it's ridiculous that when a woman reaches the position that she has reached that they're asked whether they have the skills or they're qualified.

[car traversing over uneven ground.] [silence in the vehicle.] [car traversing over rocky ground, babbling creek in the background.] [minimalist piano enters, plays throughout.] (dad) we got our subaru forester wilderness [heavy sound of water coming from waterfall.] [heavy sound of water stops abruptly.] to discover all of the places that make us feel something more. [heavy sound of water from waterfall re-enters.] (vo) subaru is the national park foundation's largest corporate donor, helping expand access for all. when you smell the amazing scent of gain flings... time stops.

(♪) your heart races. (♪) your eyes close. (♪) and you realize you're in love... steve? with a laundry detergent. gain flings. seriously good scent. and 50% more fresh. now that's love at first sniff. loving this pay bump on our allowance. wonder where mom and dad got the extra money? maybe they won the lottery? maybe they inherited a fortune? maybe buried treasure? maybe it fell off a truck? or maybe they switched to xfinity mobile - the fastest mobile service. save hundreds a year over t-mobile, at&t and verizon.

now i can buy that electric scooter. i'm starting a private equity fund that specializes in midcap. you do you. switch to xfinity mobile today. backlash and some pats on the back for the mayor of dallas, texas tonight. eric johnson announcing that he

is switching parties from democrat to republican in a "wall street journal" op-ed. he slammed the party which he was elected by saying, "the future of america's great urban centers depends on the willingness of the nation's mayors to champion law and order and practice fiscal conservatism. our cities desperately need the genuine commitment to these principles as opposed to the inconsistent poll-driven commitment of many democrats that has long been a defining characteristic of the gop." joining me now to respond to this is cordle coleman, party chair for the dallas county democrats. thanks for joining us here. eric johnson is blaming democratic policies for exacerbating in his words crime and homelessness. he says sxriem tax policies are the reasons he's breaking with your party. what's your response to that? >> absolutely untrue. we can see in democratic cities

throughout the country where crime is lower than even in republican states. so we cannot allow these false tactics, fake news, if you will, to be shoved down the throats of texans and the voters in texas. >> one of the things we should note here just for context, the city of dallas, he's been leading the city of dallas for some years now. the murders are down in the city for 15 -- over 15% over the last two years. rapes are down 40%. robberies down nearly 30%. aggravated assaults have declined 5%. it seems like his approach is working. but his approach actually has been characterized by kind of being at odds with democrats in the city. so how is he wrong to take a different approach from the party that he has been affiliated with? >> well, you know, things have been working in dallas. not only these numbers or these metrics. but we have to include community policing, conversations with our neighbors. we have been doing that type of work. so to take a pivot right now at

this time, we have to ask the critical question, why now? what is it that's on the other end of this that you're not being transparent about with voters? >> you're saying he's taking a pivot. i guess the point i'm making is he would say he's been governing from a centrist position. >> sure. >> right? and it's working. >> as far as the metrics? >> that's what he would say. >> i'm sure he would say that. >> and you don't think it's working? even though the data seems to show that it might be? >> i believe that the data seems to point to that fact. however, if it is working, why now switch teams? that's the question. >> he also earlier this year invited republican senators ted cruz and john cornyn to his inauguration. both senators spoke highly of him. is there anything wrong with having bipartisan relationships? or do you think that this was a deception to the voters who elected him basically as a progressive, as a democrat, although in dallas there's a technicality, they don't technically have party affiliation. >> sure.

>> but he was elected as a progressive. >> he was elected as a democrat, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with having bipartisan relationships, being able to get things done across the aisle. specifically in texas. we know in the texas house, which he served, democrats are in the minority. so there has to be a bipartisan effort and a way to get things done. however, we must be real and transparent about who we are as candidates, who we are as elected officials. >> do you think he was not transparent? >> i do. i do believe he was not transparent. he was just elected less than four months ago unopposed, actually. so he ran on democratic values. i believe the voters trusted him and thought he would uphold those democratic values. now we see a now mayor who's turning republican who has turned his back on the very voters who advanced his political career. >> kardal coleman, thank you so much for joining us tonight. >> thank you so much for having me. and coming up next, president biden makes a big announcement about the auto workers strike.

and melinda gates joins me on inequality in form. plus former trump aide cassidy hutchinson, she's speaking out tonight about her fear after testifying and what happened to her after that day. (energetic music plays) there he is! it's right there! ♪ oh, he's straight ahead. he's straight ahead. straight ahead. go go go. ♪ cover more ground in the kia sportage turbo-hybrid. kia. movement that inspires.

as someone living with type 2 diabetes, i want to keep it real and talk about some risks. with type 2 diabetes you have up to 4 times greater risk of stroke, heart attack, or death. even at your a1c goal, you're still at risk ...which if ignored could bring you here... ...may put you in one of those... ...or even worse. too much? that's the point. get real about your risks and do something about it. talk to your health care provider about ways to lower your risk of stroke, heart attack, or death. learn more at getrealaboutdiabetes.com hi, i'm jill and i've lost 56 pounds on golo. hi, i'm barry and i've lost 42 pounds. jill and i are a team. if she tells me to do something, i usually jump on board. golo was doable, it's realistic, and it's something we can do the rest of our lives.

nice footwork. man, you're lucky, watching live sports never used to be this easy. now you can stream all your games like it's nothing. yes! [ cheers ] yeah! woho! running up and down that field looks tough. it's a pitch. get way more into what you're into when you stream on the xfinity 10g network.

president biden announcing that he will join the auto worker picket line in detroit next week just a day before donald trump is set to appear there as well. this as the strike expands tonight into more plants. now, i sat down with melinda french gates to discuss this era of strikes in america, income inequality and also vice president kamala harris and her deeply personal mission to tackle what she calls the most urgent global issue today. >> there are so many issues that face the world that you could be tackling. this one, which is what happens

to women, their health, their ability to have children, it's literally the oldest problem that we as a human race have faced. why is it still a problem? >> because we don't invest enough in women's health. i mean, the fact that we still have, you know, 800 moms dying in childbirth every day just tells you right there, we know a lot of the right interventions to do. yes, there are new innovations coming and we can talk about that. but we don't invest enough in women's health to say this is a priority, this is important, let's not lose this mom. >> why do you think progress on this particular issue seems to have stalled? here in the united states we may even be going backwards. >> the fact you're ten times more likely to die in our system than in japan or israel or spain, that makes no sense. and the fact that a black or indigenous woman is three times

as likely to die as a white woman? it's because we have a system that is not set up to serve everybody well and to serve them equitably. and so we're not making the right investments in data to learn exactly why women are dying or investments in the system to take bias out of the system and to use all the right tools. it's just unnecessary. >> your daughter recently -- >> my oldest daughter, jen, recently gave birth. and again, there's a lot of time when you're in the delivery room, if it's going well, where you're waiting. and i could think about the other women who weren't being served well around the world. because i've been in delivery rooms, honestly, all over the world. thank god, i was so grateful she had a healthy birth for herself and for her child. >> from a policy perspective, especially here in the united states, what's stopping political leaders from actually addressing some of these issues? >> it's will. it's political will.

it's saying these lives matter. every mom matters. to not put women first in our policies, whether it's child care, whether it's paid family medical leave, whether it's maternal mortality, to say moms are important to us and we're going to make sure that our system changes for moms -- that's what's not happening. >> and perhaps not enough women making those decisions in the halls of power? >> i've become very passionate, and i'm actually putting money behind now trying to get far more women into state legislatures. there are 7,000 seats that are available. it's a great training ground to be up on the hill. when we get more women and people of color making our policies, our policies will change to support women and families. >> i have to ask you as we're having this conversation, we have a black woman as vice president of the united states. the first time that's ever

happened. a woman or a black woman. but at the same time, she gets questions all the time about whether she's qualified for the job. when you hear that and you compare it to the rest of the world stage that you operate in, what do you think? >> i think it's ridiculous that when a woman reaches the position that she has reached, that they're asked whether they have the skills or they're qualified. i mean, one of the things that to me is outrageous is that we have a senate in the united states that has no female black senators. not a single black female senator in our country. yet we have millions of black women. so how can we have a senate or a house that we say actually represents we the people? and so again, it's these bias in the system. it's the harassment. we're sending women and women of color into a broken system. and until we can get them to all these positions of power, we're not going to fix and change that system.

>> i want to ask you just more broadly, we are also sitting in a time where we're in the middle of all these strikes, right? auto workers, actors, directors, you name it. it seems like in this country there's a question about fairness in our economy. you've had the pleasure and luxury of being a fabulously wealthy person, deciding also to give a lot of that, most of it, away. but when you look at the broader society, especially here in the united states, what do you see? is it fair? >> it's not working for us. what we're hearing from workers is, these wages aren't working for us anymore to raise our families so that we become middle income or go from middle to high-income. that's the american dream. that's what my grandfather lived, my parents lived. and i have been fortunate enough in the situation i'm in. everybody should be able to live that dream. i think you're hearing people

rise up and say, let's fix this system. like capitalism works in certain ways, but there's certain societal things it's not addressing and we need to rebalance. >> you walk in so many of these spaces with people that have a lot of privilege, world leaders, et cetera. when you're in those rooms, are you thinking the wealthiest should pay even more than they're paying now in taxes? >> i do say that i think we should have stair-step taxes in our country. i do think it's more fair for the wealthy to pay more than somebody who's low-income. so i do believe in that. and i believe it's up to the wealthy to give back and give back substantially. if you have anything close to $10 million, you can give back half of it quite easily. so it's our duty to give it back and give it back well and show models to other people of wealth of how they can do it also. >> so melinda french gates. there's lorraine powell jobs.

mackenzie scott, formerly bezos. a lot of people would say powerful women, women who prioritize giving back. is there something there? why is it that women seem to be the ones really prioritizing this, putting a stake in the ground and saying, philanthropy is important once you reach a certain point of wealth? >> well, i think you see men and women giving back. but i think you see women doing it in a different way. we are the threads that make up the fabric of society. we are the ones who, in all three of our cases -- mackenzie, lorraine, and me -- we've all raised children. we have a different view on society. and what you're seeing all three women do is invest in communities and invest in other women. because we know, if you invest in a woman, she invests in everyone else. >> do you all know each other? >> we do all know each other, yeah. we all know each other.

we've worked on some projects together. everybody's also working on their own pieces. but these are both women i admire greatly. and when i need advice, they're both two women that i walk with and talk with and ask them, how are you looking at this? how do you think about this? >> have you found that you have wanted to change your approach or re-establish yourself now as melinda french gates on your own? >> i think i do both. i mean, i'm still a co-chair of the bill and melinda gates foundation. i completely believe and i'm still traveling on behalf of that. but yes, there's a mark i want to make on the world, and i have a little bit more degrees of freedom to do that. now standing on my own, i've gotten comfortable with it and i feel like i can just speak my mind freely. and i enjoy that. i enjoy just being myself. >> thank you so much, melinda. appreciate it. >> thanks for having me, abby. and we have some breaking news tonight. a hurricane watch is now being

issued for parts of the east coast as a tropical storm gets stronger. stand by. better. cough? congestion? all in one and done with new mucinex kickstart. aaaaah! ah! hated that. headache? better. ah! fever? body pain? better now. aaaaah! new mucinex kickstart gives all in one and done relief with a morning jolt of instant cooling sensation. it's not cold and flu season. it's comeback season.

every day, more dog people, and more vets are deciding it's time for a fresh approach to pet food. they're quitting the kibble. and kicking the cans. and feeding their dogs dog food that's actually well, food. developed with vets. made from real meat and veggies. portioned for your dog. and delivered right to your door. it's smarter, healthier pet food. get 50% off your first box at thefarmersdog.com/realfood

♪ if there's pain when you try to poo ♪ ♪ and going sometimes feels like you ♪ ♪ pushed through a pineapple or two ♪ ♪ colace is the brand you need ♪ ♪ to soften stools, we're all agreed ♪ ♪ #2 should be easy to do ♪ trust colace to soften stools with no stimulants for comfortable relief. what's considered normal for your cat is interesting. but if your cat isn't their quirky self lately, they may have pain from a common condition called osteoarthritis. now, there's solensia. solensia is a once-monthly injection

to control your cat's oa pain. veterinary professionals administering solensia who are pregnant, trying to conceive, or breast feeding should take extreme care to avoid self-injection. self-injection could cause allergic reactions like anaphylaxis. ask your vet about solensia and help get your cat back to their normal. may lead to severe vision loss and if you're taking a multi-vitamin alone, you may be missing a critical piece... preservision. preservision areds 2 contains the only clinically proven nutrient formula recommended by the

national eye institute to help reduce the risk of moderate to advanced amd progression. preservision is backed by 20 years of clinical studies. so ask your doctor about adding preservision and fill in a missing piece of your plan. like i did with preservision. now with ocusorb better absorbing nutrients. breaking news, a hurricane watch is being issued for portions of north carolina as tropical storm ophelia is strengthening. forecasts predict a storm surge of up to six feet, which is already threatening the coast. our own chad myers is standing by in the cnn weather center. chad? >> abby, the storm is less than 100 miles offshore, but it really is looking like it's getting still a little bit stronger right now. winds could be 75 or 80 miles per hour gusting on shore overnight. that is hurricane force, especially with the gusts now at

49 miles per hour at virginia beach already. the biggest threat is going to be the coastal erosion and surge of the water that runs up these estuaries across parts of the east coast. the winds are going to blow from the east for a very long time, pushing water along that coast and rising that water up to surge levels of up to six feet in some spots, so yes, it begins to slow down tomorrow as it makes shore -- makes landfall probably between 5:00 and 6:00 if the morning. but then by sunday it's all over with gusts only around 20 miles per hour. abby? >> all right, chad myers, thank you so much. we'll keep our eye on that. that is it for me tonight. cnn primetime is coming up next with laura coates. she hosts an entire hour on senator bob menendez's indictment. stick around for that. ♪

♪ the l'or barista coffee and espresso system. now brewing peet's coffee.

the day you get your clearchoice dental implants makes every day... a "let's dig in" day... mm. ...a "chow down" day... a "take a big bite" day... a "perfectly delicious" day... - mm. [ chuckles ] - ...a "love my new teeth" day. because your clearchoice day is the day everything is back on the menu. a clearchoice day changes every day. schedule a free consultation.