and just to. police are contradicting vivek

ramaswamy and his campaign after an incident involving protesters at his car. in iowa today, ramaswamy claimed the protesters ramped into his car at an event. but police now say that the driver accidentally backed into his car in a parking lot. that driver was not there to protest. and that's all for me. thanks for watching laura coates is back in her hour starts right now. that was a quick turnaround i was just here, is a déjà vu. >> it's like you never left. >> look at this our airings match. >> okay that's called alignment. a smooth handover is what we are doing right now. >> it's like air traffic control. thank you very much abby philips everyone i'm laura coates good evening everyone. we talk about the news for a second. the former president donald trump's expected to endorse ohio congressman jim jordan to be the next speaker of the house. i want you to think about that for a second. it is an extremely important

point and an extremely important position. think about the role of the speaker of the house. the speaker is the second in line to the presidency right after the vice president of the united states. and the duties, while a included ministry oath of office to members, giving members permission to even speak on the house floor. counting and declaring all votes. appointing members to committees, sending bills to committees, signing bills and resolutions that passed in the house. that's a whole lot of responsibility. today jim jordan has been prioritizing investigating what he believed to be a weaponized government. now will that change in light of the other responsibilities? you know, i don't want to get ahead of myself because there are obviously other republicans who are vying for that gavel and even with the expected endorsement by a man who is called the head of the republican party, there is actually no guarantee that

jordan will get the job. it's not entirely clear that he will get the required 218 votes. or if really anyone on the bench can for the republicans can get that number. a source tells us that the gop conference is not even going to be meeting until six pm on monday, ahead of the candidates forum on tuesday. and then the election on wednesday. now that's a pretty quick turnaround from that conference meeting to a vote and if you don't count the vote that it will have been a week between ousting mccarthy and that new vote. so what happens then? the cane can gets kicked down the road a little bit further? remember it's not just the duties of the speaker the house, remember all the things that house itself is not doing right now. there's aid for ukraine, there's funding the u.s. government, the immigration crisis at our borders being talked a lot about today with the wall. the epidemic of gun violence is

killing thousands and thousands of us every single year. the climate crisis is fueling wildfires and floods and monsoons. that's as former president trump is facing for criminal trials. and there is the report that today that the former president allegedly discussed potentially sensitive information about the united states nuclear submarines with who? a member of his mar-a-lago club. that's according to abc's reporting. did i mention that the government is running out of money in about 40 days? you think this is uncharted territory? well you ain't seen nothing yet. just wait until the court dates in the campaign events are filling up the calendar and you are going to have to squint really hard just to between the court of law in the court of public opinion. now people will tell you this is just politics as usual kid, but doesn't this just feel different? is normal in the rearview

mirror officially? and this republic. how do we keep it? want to dig into all of this with michael eric dyson. he's a distinguished professor of african american studies at vanderbilt university. he's also the coauthor of an equal, a story of america. michael i am so glad you are here tonight, when we think about this step back and what all this means. and the news tonight that trump is now expected to endorse jim jordan as speaker. now he has been in congress in the public eye for nearly 20 years, but what would that do to the country in your mind? >> all, it's great to see you laura, from being a grand marshal at your alma mater to seeing you here at cnn. i think it represents the extension of a neo-fascist uprising in american culture where if you are dissatisfied with the speaker of the house and you are matt gaetz facing yourself in the past elise was

serious allegations of harm, you are able to pull down this man with all of a power the egan muster and send the culture into chaos. i think that jim jordan is an extension of that same trajectory. that same kind of right-wing politics that is not good for the country. there are many conservatives that would do well in this nation because they love the country. jim jordan doesn't appear to be cut from that cloth. >> there are many who find him very polarizing, others who might perhaps support. and let's break down these issues one of the time. because as you mentioned a handful of republican rebels brought the people's work on the capitol hill to a shuddering halt. some say they had a non data reason, others are saying this might be the tyranny of the minority. how do you see it? >> yeah, it's definitely a vanda driven by the tyranny of minority. when you allow emotionally driven politics to determine the future of america, we are

in bad shape as you already illuminated and reiterated, democracy is best when it has a healthy discord, a kind of dialogue that is based on serious intellectual and political differences. not the kind of personal hatreds that have so clouded the american mainstream that bigotry seems to be normal and deliberation seems to be out the door. >> you know, it's interesting because it's not the first time in history we have had divisive rhetoric or politics or very personal attacks, but our system itself was designed from the start to make change slowly so we could not make rash decisions to change the entire structure of government. but i wonder if in these times that we are in, is it too slow to keep pace? >> yeah, well depending on what side you are on, the thing is too much, too little, too fast, too quick or too slow. look, that's why moderation has

been of the ringing endorsement of a greek derived sense of democracy. that if we go too fast, we will get there but we will be in the ditch. and if we go to slow, we'll wait for the revolution to keep going and will miss it. the question is, are we able to summons the best angels of our nature to moderate either extreme and find ourselves in a position where we reflect not only the will of the people but the best thing for the nation and its healthy democracy? >> someone says, why can't you get the best person for the job as a politician, because the best person doesn't want that particular job. maybe the reasons you're talking about who knows? but this week trump is using increasingly violent rhetoric. he's been calling for executing shoplifters, saying that migrants poison our country. listen. >> we will immediately stop all of the pillaging and theft. very simply, if you drop a store, you can fully expect to be shot as you are leaving that

store. [applause] shot! we will stand up to crazy nancy pelosi who ruined san francisco. hauser has been doing by the way anybody? no >> nobody has ever seen anything like we were witnessing now. it is very sad thing for our country. poisoning the blood of our country. it is so bad and people are coming in with disease, people are coming in with every possible thing that you could imagine. >> this is a disgrace and you're gonna go after this attorney general. >> now we use the word executed, he's using the word shot. not sure what he means there are not. but when you think of a former president saying these things, will be at the very top of every news broadcast. he would be everywhere. but they are not. is it because we have become numb to this? >> we have become numb and desensitized. is the former president willing to subject himself to the same penalty should he be found

guilty of some of the pillaging and plundering in thievery about which he has been accused? whether from his former university or lying about his money so he can hide them and so on? he has committed allegedly egregious crimes. is he willing to be subjected to the same measure? of course not. this is about the politics of purity in terms of ideology and the hateful stand that trump has unleashed in america and unfortunately and tragically too many people have tried to follow suit. >> it's interesting whether he would in fact believe his own rhetoric. but you often hear this phrase, we are better than this, or this isn't how it supposed to work in america. this is not us, this is not america. but americans elected these leaders, he is the presumptive head of the republican party. obviously major party in the two party system. is this who we are becoming? >> i mean, if we look back at frederick douglass or abraham

lincoln or gunner myrtle, any other observer of america, yes. who america's is a choice. when we say this is not america, or this is america, that's because we make a choice to be one or the other. this is an american experiment, a grand experiment in democracy. it is not yet settled, it will never be. it is an ongoing evolution of great possibility and dangerous demonizing instincts. the choices before us, and if we choose people who perpetuate a legacy of hatefulness and bigotry, this is indeed who we are as a nation. >> democracy says america the choice of to be ours. michael eric dyson, such a pleasure to talk to you tonight. >> always great to talk to you. >> well, they say that seeing is believing. but what about cameras in the courtroom for donald trump's election subversion trial in d.c.? well it further divide us. have or have people already made up their minds? minnesota tourney general keith

ellison is here to discuss. next.

tonight more than a dozen major media organizations are asking the judge that oversees president trump's selection subversion case to broadcast the trial. now in order to argue the historic nature of this case and it is historic, warns to a very special rule that prohibits cameras in the courtrooms. cnn is actually one of the media let's asking judge tanya chutkan permission to record and also telecast the march 24th trial. want to talk about all of this with minnesota attorney general keith ellison, author of break the wheel, and in the cycle of police violence. he is argued against cameras in the past the minnesota police officer derek chauvin's trial for the murder of george floyd, but his since changed his mind. and you know of course that trial was of course televised. attorney general ellison, thank

you so much for being here tonight. i'm so glad to have a chance to speak with you about this tonight. people may have not realize having seen that actual trial televise, you initially didn't want to do that. why? >> that's true laura, i did not want to have the case televised because i feared that vulnerable witnesses might not be forthcoming if they knew that they were going to be having their image broadcast around the world. i was concerned about that the folks that happen to be on that fateful corner on may 25th, 2020, they didn't volunteer to be in the media limelight. but they just happened to be on that corner. and i was nervous that they would not come forward. but i learned that it was overwhelmingly positive. i learned that judge cahill's right to order that the case be televised. he did it because of covid,

because we really didn't have a gallery. that was because of covid spacing restrictions, but it ended up being the right thing. >> and you mention also one of the people who was so important to this case to people that actually captured on the cell phone was really a young girl, a young woman at the time. people were concerned about that as well, a minor. so it was evolution, but some people might look at this and say the reason not to have it is because the person is actually the defendant in this case. trump's trial is about the derek chauvin trial. the nature of the defense is extraordinarily different, and you are well aware of the potential for his antics. how do you look at the fact that the former president of the united states, if donald trump specifically did that factor into whether you think there ought to be cameras in that courtroom? >> he has, i think because of those facts that you mentioned, those facts work in favor of

cameras in the courtroom and telecasting that trial. because look, there are literally millions of people that might believe he is innocent and there are some who think he is guilty. let's look at the evidence. let's let everybody see the evidence so we can squash rumor and suspicion and the far out interpretation. let's just have it all put out for the world to see and if trump wants to testify he can do that. but i think that the country will accept the verdict whatever it is if this trial is televised and the world can see. people think that things are doing being done unfairly, they will see it. if they think the trial is being conducted in a fair, professional matter they will see that to. >> that's a fair point because i have been thinking about that. there's all this polling out there in, fact there's a gallup poll that shows the public confidence in institutions is

low. 45% of americans who are very middle or low confidence in the criminal justice service system. 50% free television is for the trust. and the idea of the combination of these two things in particular would be very impactful, but you also have to wonder that the fact you have donald trump former president speaking about this to tiered justice system in the weaponization of the government and the so-called witch hunts and all the different states and sees making. having people seeing it in realtime could really give that opportunity to see it for themselves. doesn't really say things inside the courtroom the what about the fact that it would be broadcast during a campaign season as well. does the politics at play here make an impression to you? >> well, you can't take the politics out of american life. it's just there. i think it's an inescapable thing. i think the only thing you can do is have some sunshine. have some sunshine on all the

facts so people can really know for themselves what happened, so they can make their own mind up about what the evidence means and how they can weigh it. whether donald trump is being treated fairly or not. the campaign nature of this is something you simply cannot avoid unless you delay the trial beyond the point where all the electoral matters are dispensed with. but then you've got the problem of stale evidence, of justice delayed is justice denied, and the fact that there are a lot of things a can go wrong if you put this off. so i would say do it now, deal with the politics, and you should not be able to use and election to sort of avoid justice. and i think a public trial is part of the justice process. >> that's fascinating especially given today because trump submitted a motion to have the entire case we're talking about right now dismissed. part of the reason he's doing so is because of the politics.

i don't mean election related aspects of it, but he's cited presidential immunity, he cited his acquittal in the senate impeachment trial, obviously a political mechanism, but the alleged crimes that are centered on in this case of things he did after he left office in part. so what is this all about? is it a way trying to hope that the public doesn't understand the nuance or the distinction or just throwing something against the wall and hoping it sticks? >> well, i think it's the latter. but let me tell you, presidential immunity is a thing, but it exists because when a president is discharging official actions that there needs to be some protection so that the president doesn't have to second guess every single thing he does and worry about litigation. what could possibly be official about committing a criminal act? in fact the definition of a criminal act is that it is exceeds your official duties. it is outside and in contrary

and against your official duties. so i think that this simply doesn't work. you cannot commit a crime in the courts of your official duties in the turn around and say protect me because i was on the job doing official duties. a crime is a crime, nobody is above the law, everybody has to face the law. >> attorney general keith ellison thank you so much. well, there's a new report saying that former president trump allegedly discussed sensitive nuclear submarine information with a mar-a-lago member. the possible national security and legal implications are next.

the power goes out and we still have wifi

to do our homework. and that's a good thing? great in my book! who are you? no power? no problem. introducing storm-ready wifi. now you can stay reliably connected through power outages with unlimited cellular data and up to 4 hours of battery back-up to keep you online. only from xfinity. home of the xfinity 10g network. here's why you should switch from chrome to duckduckgo. duckduckgo is a browser you download to your mobile and desktop devices. unlike chrome, the duckduckgo browser has privacy built-in. it comes with a private alternative to google search, which doesn■t spy on your searches, and it blocks cookies and creepy ads. and there's no catch. it's free. we make money from ads, but they don't follow you around. join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on mobile and desktop today. well there are some new and

report alarming report about with the former president did with sensitive information. abc and the new york times reporting tonight that months after leaving office, trump allegedly discuss details about u.s. nuclear submarines with a member of his mar-a-lago club. an australian billionaire who allegedly went on to share that information with dozens of others, including foreign officials and also journalists. now according to abc, this information was recorded to special counsel jack smith and this is not part of the indictment. trump spokesman said the former president did nothing wrong and blasted what they said is illegal leaks. i have talked with norm eisen, and josue mincey one, national security analyst and former adviser to the u.s. state

department. joe religious phi don't get your name perfect you go first. so here's the rule. this information we are talking about the significance of it you actually posted on x why this is so concerning. i want to read for the audience a bit about this, you said you held topsey security clearance in the past, you never saw this inform, and that trump giving this to a foreign national even an ally is a major breach. is this what they call actionable intelligence and what does that mean? >> it is actionable intelligences. some of the higher most highly classified information we have. i had i was covering nuclear secret weapons, i never knew what exactly the payload was for nuclear arms summaries. i don't know how close we can get to an enemies sub before detection. and the reason is you want the enemy to have maximum uncertainty. you don't want them to know exactly what your capabilities

are. it's the essence of our deterrence theory. you want the enemy to be deterred from acting, because they fear the uncertainty of what you might do if i had done is i've been joe. if norma done this, or be fbi agents breaking out his door. he'd be in handcuffs we might not seem for a very long time. there should be one rule for all. you cannot give away even at a party to a billionaire pow the most closely held secrets of the united states. >> and i would imagine this information is quite evergreen in the sense it is not going to change month a month week to week. so the fact that he's sharing it anytime a, could still be accurate. >> it could still be accurate actually. for example, if we have to summaries in the pacific theater right now, they could be carrying between 80 warheads or 320 warheads. you don't want china to know exactly how many. you don't want them to be able

to plot their moves based on what they think the united states is capable of doing. >> to be clear, we don't know if the information that was actually described or shot allegedly is accurate, whether trump relayed the truth of what you knew or whether he knew anything at all. there's a lot of speculation in that. but legally speaking, if what he is shared at all the fact that he shared, are the legal implications. >> there are profound legal implications, and the reason is it is -- if it's true that he had these conversation, and there seems to be a lot of corroboration. is the lot of reporting, abc news, the time, cnn has its own reporting on this now. it shows that the risk profile of these documents that donald trump the many documents containing national security

documents for the government innocent until proven guilty, what other information did he share? if he would be so cavalier with something that could upset america's nuclear deterrence. who knows those dozens of alleged people who were told by mr. trump, who knows who they pass it on to? what else happened? it shows the danger of him possessing these documents. now -- >> he's not charged -- >> he's not charged with it but it is possible that the government will bring it in at trial. we know there is reporting that the prosecutors have inquired, that they have accumulated information even asked questions a lot of different ways so they can come in a trial. it really speaks to why these are such serious crimes, because this information can be dangerous and deadly to all americans and our allies. >> so coming in as not indicted

the kind of a prior bad act or ammo that somebody is using or pattern of some way is one way to get it in. but that is the court of law. about the court of diplomacy if you will? because as these reports come out, the revelations to or not, if we are reading about, if we are hearing about, our allies are certainly hearing something about it. perhaps our geo political enemies are hearing about it. does this disrupt our diplomatic efforts, just a revelation of a possibility? >> absolutely. this is something that donald trump would tell an acquaintance for no monetary gain it appears, just sort of throw it out at a party at mar-a-lago, what else is he doing with some of the other information? as he actually trying to monetize some of it? what is he telling saudi arabia, what is he telling israel, what is he telling the russians about this? that's the danger of all this. once you open up this can, there's really no end of it. >> as a former ambassador, i

dealt every day with representatives of foreign governments. and right now this story is circling around the globe and people are saying hey, this guy is the leading candidate of one of the two major political parties. he's in national polls in very close proximity to his opponent. is this kind of a person who would tamper or risk the security of the united states, its citizens, and our allies? can he be trusted? what does it mean for the u.s. allies, and that's why this court case proceeding on time is so important to have the rule of law say hey, there are consequences when you do this, even if you're a former president. >> don't forget, we call it the president, but it's also the commander in chief, and so the implications are rays for service members really important as well. joe cirincione, norm eisen

thank you so much for being here. >> thank you. >> well, viola fletcher survived the tulsa race massacre 102 years ago, and she is still fighting to this day for reparations. the question is, will the oldest living survivor see the justice that she wants with the case now before the oklahoma supreme court? her lawyer joins me next.

109 year old miss viola fletcher was just seven when she witnessed one of the most significant acts of racial violence in american history. it was 1921 and a white mob

rampaged through tulsa's greenwood district, the lovely black community also known as black wall street. now all of this over false accusations of a 19 year old black teen assaulting a white 16 year old girl. and the rampage would later be known as the tulsa race massacre. explosives were tossed from airplanes, black people were being shot dead in the street and more than 1000 black homes and businesses were reduced to ashes. reports at the time stated there were a least 36 people killed, but many historians today believe that numbers up to at least 300 people who may have been murdered in the brutal attacks. for decades, viola fletcher never publicly spoke about what she had witnessed to anyone, fearful that she might be attacked for speaking out. then in may of 2020, she was tracked down by damario solomon-simmons who convinced her to join a civil lawsuit demanding reparations for her

and the last two known remaining survivors of the massacre. now the century-long fight is with the oklahoma supreme court. joining me now to discuss is damario solomon-simmons, a national civil rights attorney. damario, thank you so much for being here with me. we've spoken about what has happened before and i'm glad you here for turned because she is being waiting nearly her entire life for justice. does she believe that you will actually see it in her lifetime? >> yeah laura, thank you for having me on, it's so good to see. yes, she believes it and in fact today laura we were at oklahoma state capital when, we were there having an interim study with some state lawmakers talking about this very issue. we have the case in oklahoma supreme court. we are fighting on all fronts and we went to the to the state capital today. she was there, viola fletcher at 109 years old was there for

four hours as we talk to state lawmakers and we talked about the need for reparations to move forward. 22 years ago, the oklahoma state legislator published a report about what they call the tulsa race riots at the time, it is specifically says in the recommendations there should be reparations, cash payments made to viola fletcher. so she showing up and saying i'm one of the three living survivors, about or nine years old, and fighting in the courts, and fighting in legislative all 's, why don't you do the right thing and give us our reparations, give it to our community? she believes with all her heart. >> 109 years old, none of us have the excuse as to why we cannot speak through too and about power if, she still is fighting. but it's an interesting topic. because reparations can be very polarizing as you know. most of the time talked about in the context of slavery. people say is to tenuous a connection between descendants of slaves and those who are here now of course even far

removed. but she is a survivor and a witness to what happened. it's a much more direct line. does that make a difference? >> it makes a huge difference and that's why i have been saying for the last 20 years i've been in this fight, tulsa is the linchpin for reparations made to american people, because in tulsa you have hundreds of pictures, you have video, you showed some of that coming into the segment. hundreds of insurance claims, for over 1550 businesses and homes destroyed. and we have living survivors who can tell you what happened. viola fletcher was seven years old, another one was six years old at the time of the massacre. it makes a huge difference. and i always say, if we can win into also, then we can win anywhere, but we must win in tulsa so we can win anywhere. and what we start with laura, is it owed, is the destruction, is it owed over $200 million in property damage is it no. it talking but historians now saying 300 people dead.

what we do know that 3000 people disappeared because of the massacre. on may 30th, 1921, they were in tulsa accounted for and on june 1st, 1921 we never heard from them again. were they killed, were they murdered, were they thrown in a mass grave, with a thrown in the arkansas river? we will never know that maybe to this day but we do know that something is owed. we do know that tulsa is the linchpin for all the reparations throughout this country for black people. reparations is not a revolutionary concept. we do it every day in our civil justice system. your hip from hainan a carney break a leg and you're off work for, monthly pay for that. we pay for lost wages, that's reparation. we pay for your pain and suffering, that's reparations, and we pay for your medical bills, that's reparations. because we understand we need to make the personal, they can be better, they can be get back to be a productive member of society. >> and yet even know that, the concept of making some of all, the context of reparations,

maybe the phrasing of how it's been described or misunderstood is not very popular. a washington post poll shows that 70% of americans believe the government should not pay black americans whose ancestors were slave and, 20% don't think that black americans should be paid at all. but there is the idea of slavery as one of the reasons, but now there is this notion that this is an issue of a living witness and victim to a crime. that might be the gestation here. does the legislative branch in oklahoma city it that way? >> we hope so. we had a very positive meeting, it's been 22 years since that report came out, that said they need to pay reparations to the survivors. their descendants deserve a scholarship, in a proper memorial. they haven't done any of those things, but provided a few scholarship, they haven't done any of the things. we think in this moment post george floyd and that's what happened two years ago, we have pele like you laura the bring us on to talk about this, and

we hope their state legislators will do the right thing. we hope that oklahoma state court will give us the opportunity to move our state case forward in trial, and we hope that the people around this country will stand with this just for justice for greenwood, justice for viola fletcher and push everyone to make sure they get the reparations they deserve. >> damario thank you so much. as you know i've actually taken my children to the tulsa greenwood district to see for my own eyes. if you ever get a chance, it will see the different blocks of where businesses wants to state. they are on the ground, it gives you such clarity as to the overwhelming tragedy that took place. there's the greenwood rising center people should see as well. thank you so much for joining us tonight. >> thank you so much laura it is good to see you. >> me to thank you. up next, remembering and nfl legend. tributes are pouring in for the late pick but gush, one of the most postured actors in the

history.

well we have some sad news tonight. chicago bears hall of fame linebacker but kisses died at the age of 80. not peacefully in his sleep is california home according to his family. he was considered one of the best defensive players in nfl history. tornado's region nichols head of headliners, with rachel nichols on showtime. rachel, i'm glad you are here. you are the perfect person to help us on back's legacy. people sometimes know him later in his career as a commentator, maybe some of the commercials about him. but his legacy was really significant. >> absolutely. he was an iconic football

player. he played with the ferocity that is not even allowed with that level of violence anymore. he was referred to as the monsters of the midway. sports illustrated put him on the cover and, cities the most revered man in football. it a teammate that says when he hits you, he doesn't want to put you in the hospital he wants to put in the cemetery. but the thing that struck me was that he represented so much more to the people of chicago. he was born there, he grew up there, he went to the university and illinois. so for the bears stands in fans in the stands, he epitomized them. who they wanted to be. he was strong, it was tough, and frankly was something special for chicago to time in the 60s and 70s when the mad men new york in the flower children of california were taken over california culture. >> he went in the first round, his whole career played with chicago bears. he remained so iconic, that even after he retired he was still commenting as a retired person as well. but one thing that's really problematic to me.

i admit that i'm beginning a bit of a curmudgeon on this issue. but as much of his legacy is intact, tonight when you are watching football he might be mentioned fewer times than taylor swift. while i am a taylor swift fan, i have really been holman owning in this focus. this fixation. a part of it feels condescending to me. a lot of them talking about, now women will start to love football. you gotta be kidding me? >> nfl already has plenty of female and f alpha football fans. last week they had a rise of 2 million female viewers. but still, i have to say for people who are upset about the balance of things, the nfl has brought this on themselves. and it just leaned into the taylor swift phenomenon, dave dive in and bought scuba coleman. finally we have the social media accounts what they were earlier in the week, but they were referring, there you go.. this is the nfl account for all 32 teams. it's not kansas city chiefs account. you have travis kelce jerseys

going up 400%. today new york post came out with a more serious story saying that the nfl, look this is the nfl -- that's at. of course taylor swift, they are doing it to themselves. they are saying that if the post came up with a story today reporting that the nfl as pressured tv network to give up commercial time for free during games to promote taylor swift's concert movie. there's a lot going on here. >> but why? when you think that? is >> because it is so lucrative. let me give you an example. the nfl has 28 million instagram followers. that's a lot, 28 million. taylor swift as 273 million followers on instagram. 273 to 28. so they want to suck up as much of that as they can and unfortunately in this case, it's overshadowing the passage of a legend. >> there's so many people who are gonna be looking at this and looking at those numbers and how comes down to that. we've talked in the past about

the nfl and how sometimes the commercial game has overshadowed some of the significant issues that players can focus on. a >> hundred percent. travis kelce's himself said that the nfl has been overdoing it. we will have to see if whether the sunday things get tonya. if she is in the stands again. i many times we see here. the last time they cut two or a dozen times, we can not count and see if they do it again. it's overshadowing everything in the game right now. there's been a serious backlash among football fans. and you're right, for women who love football near planted them, i'm one of them. nobody needs to be mansplained about what a football is. and even four people are coming to the game for taylor swift it is insulting. >> thank you. i'm so glad you came on. everyone knows i've been like really. really? and i think she's going to minnesota which is my hometown this weekend. >> we have opposing players that have come out and say we don't want her to come.

we don't want her there. >> maybe that's a bridge too far. rachel nichols, thank you so much as always for being here. thank you all everyo for watching tonight. our coverage continues.

from chrome to duckduckgo. duckduckgo is a browser you download to your mobile and desktop devices. unlike chrome, the duckduckgo browser has privacy built-in. it comes with a private alternative to google search, which doesn■t spy on your searches, and it blocks cookies and creepy ads. and there's no catch. it's free.

we make money from ads, but they don't follow you around. join the millions of people taking back their privacy by downloading duckduckgo on mobile and desktop today. >> tonight on three 60. new reporting that donald trump essentially disclose sensitive information about american nuclear subs at. mar-a-lago, to a fellow billionaire, who reportedly told dozens more. also tonight, jim jordan says he would take the job to. later, and one of the deadliest attacks in ukraine that we have ever see