we begin with breaking news from the uk. buckingham palace revealing king charles has cancer. let's get straight to max foster who is in london. you have been reporting on this since the moment the news broke. what have you learned? >> reporter: the details are he went in for this enlarged prostate procedure. a couple weeks ago. they did some tests and they found a separate cancer during those tests. this is not prostate cancer according to my sources. he has returned from -- his country house to london. he is being treated as an outpatient at home. he is still carrying on the most senior constitutional

duties. so he is doing all that work with just signing laws receiving documents from government and potentially appointing prime ministers. the central parts to the investment only he can carry out. if he does not carry them out the whole system grinds to a halt. i'm told he has that appointed counselors of state. these are members of the family who can step in for him if he becomes incapacitated. for example having to go through an operation and put under anesthetics. that gives you a sense of the seriousness of this. but they are being very careful the palace not to give precise details. they are saying he does have the right to privacy ultimately. the public also has a right to know that their head of state is being treated for something potentially quite serious. so some level of alarm about what has happened and how little we actually know. at the same time the palace trying to temper concerns to whiteley. max given the reporting

you've done on the fact that he is not picking counselors of state that he is going to continue most of his duties. does it lead you to believe this isn't a dire situation? >> reporter: well you always have to read between the words with these palace statements and the briefings you get. people close to the king. this is only a handful of people that have access to that very private medical information. i think right now it means they are quite confident and he is already talking about getting back to work. but of course with medical situations you don't know which way they will turn. you're not going to give us a running commentary but they need to tell us if he degrades suddenly or if he has to have an operation or indeed if he gets a lot better as well. one element that has concerned some people is that i know he

expects his siblings and informed them. prince harry is now going to fly over to the uk to see him. much higher than it is for the average father and son relationship because prince harry has been estranged and he has not been over often. there is a lot of tension particularly with prince william. some tension with the king charles as well. although they have been working towards a level of reconciliation i think. they've been in touch a bit. for him to come over that has raised concerns. all the wording we are getting from the palace is that this is in check. emphasizing the fact he is at home rather than in the hospital is one element of that. >> as is so often the case scary medical diagnoses bringing families back together and another reminder that this is at the end of the day a family as well. i wanted to stay with us. i want to bring in doctor -- given what we know from buckingham palace that this is

a cancer that was discovered while the king was being treated for a benign prostate enlargement. you heard max foster they are saying that according to his sources that this is not prostate cancer. but when you look at what has been said, what do you think that this could be? >> reporter: when we do in the procedures for the prostate and we are assuming in this case he had to prostate -- from inside his urine channel. when we look in there sometimes we may find things incidentally. either in the bladder there may be hotspots or red areas. or when we have shaped the prostate and we have a pathologist look at the pathology under a microscope. most of the time it is benign and that is what the report says. sometimes there could be other types of cancers within the prostate either something spread from somewhere else or other cancers that can form in the prostate that are not the standard prostate carcinoma. there are a lot of unknowns.

all we know is it was found the procedure was done. all we can assume it has something to do with the urologic track. >> what would it imply to you if he didn't different form of cancer was discovered during that prostate examination and his prostate? >> i would give kudos to the healthcare professional that took care of him. that they actually saw it when he was in there and they took a sampling of it. if it was something that was found on the pathology kudos to the individual that looked at the stuff under the microscope. prostate cancer is a very common cancer that is found in men. some of the other rare cancers that are found within the prostate don't have the best research done on them because they are very rare. they may not have the best prognosis. i don't want to alarm anyone. we are making a lot of assumptions here. i know in my own patients oftentimes i will go in for the prostate and end up finding something in the bladder. it may be a low-grade bladder

cancer. all cancers of the urologic track we know have really good treatments. so if this is something that was found early and incidentally then hopefully the treatments he is initiating this week will lead him to have a normal life and a good quality of life as well. >> we heard max foster saying the palace will not be giving a running commentary and number of updates. but there are major questions what kind of cancer this is. think the palace is keenly aware of the questions are out there. doctor stay with us. i want to bring in sally smith. sally we have the statement from buckingham palace. they say that they revealed that this diagnosis in order to prevent speculation. but in stopping short of saying what kind of cancer this is, it would seem that it would fuel more questions that for the moment at least they are not willing to answer. yes i'm afraid that is what is happening. i was struck that when kate had

her abdominal surgery there was really no speculation about what it might be. they were totally tightlipped. now we know there is a specific diagnosis of cancer. but we don't know what kind. and i think just for those very reasons, that you just mentioned , i think they probably need to go further. and say specifically what it is. we heard the oncologist say maybe it is in the bladder. maybe it is a sort of more rare form of prostate cancer. but i think they've only gone halfway. and by revealing that he has cancer, by revealing he is having treatment they've already so-called invaded his privacy. he is the head of state. and i think given the way things are in the 21st century,

they can't afford to be opaque about it. they were opaque about what was wrong with the queen. we never really knew. there were assertions that she had a form of cancer. but the palace neither confirmed nor denied it. but it was mentioned by somebody who knew her well. if you go all the way back 70 years ago, charles is grandfather king george vi had very severe lung cancer. he had his left lung removed. the doctors never revealed to the family, to the george vi much less the rest of his family much less the world that he had a malignancy and it was also and it had spread. so, times have really changed

since then. but i think we are going to i think there will be some pressure to reveal what it is. charles was applauded for being candid about his prostate. what i think we've moved to a different level now. >> sally, to appoint alex made about this kind of difficult event reminding us that this is ultimately a family. we've learned prince harry is going to be traveling to see his father in the coming days. that is despite some of the difficult moments they have had recent years. it is reported sort of estrangement within the family. >> right. i think it is an actual estrangement. i saw something saying he was already on his way. i don't know if that is true.

there does seem to be a sense of urgency. although it just may be -- as the doctor pointed out, he is beginning treatment right away. does not necessarily indicate anything about severity. but they're obviously not wasting any time. but we don't know. there are stage numbers. we don't know what stage it is. we don't know how early it was caught. so i think these are all things that probably should be mentioned just so we all know what is going on. >> soul they are certainly willing or desirous to be transparent on some level. but not completely. we will expect to see members of the royal family taking his place out in the public events. but we are told by buckingham palace i'm looking at the statement that the doctor the

doctors have told the king to postpone public facing duties while he will continue to work -- while receiving outpatient care. at home. sally smith max foster doctor jamie -- thank you for your thoughts today. still to, on news essential republicans behind the new portability may have one more chance to convince the republican colleagues to support it. an important closed-door meeting set to start very soon. the was launching more retaliatory strikes following that deadly drone attack in jordan. we will tell you exactly where. those stories and much more coming up.

some historic downpours

have dumped months worth of rain onto parts of southern california in just a matter of days. it has led to life-threatening flash floods and landslides. school closures flight cancellations and over half 1 million power outages. and the storm is not over yet. the city of los angeles has notched is rainy as a two day stretch in nearly two years. that rain is expected to continue through tomorrow. let's take you with nick watt and hard-hit la county. that river behind you nick looks nasty. couple >> reporter: morris we are in marina del rey. there is not a sign of the sun today. there is just so much water. i have never seen rain quite this relentless in la. started raining sunday morning and it has not stopped. i was on my roof all night my flat roof. we are not used to this weather here. moving tarps around. the mayor said angelenos are not used to this and she is

right. she said we might have to get used to this due to climate change. what is happening here all of this water comes from the pacific. the pacific is warmer than usual because of climate change. the moisture rises in the air and becomes an atmospheric river. el niño right now that direct that atmospheric river as southern california. this storm has basically just stalled over la. 14 million people at risk of this extreme high rainfall. we've seen up in the hills we've had quite a lot of rain the past couple weeks. the ground is already saturated. the rest of the city asphalt concrete. this rain is falling has nowhere else to go but to slide off the surface. that is why we see some hazards washed off their foundations. up in the hollywood hills. this is going to continue. it depends on where it will go. should go down to san diego. you stick around here for a little while longer. we will see records broken

today. i hope you got those tarps on your roof in place on time. stay safe out there my friend. not really. stomach appreciate the attempt. david is in the la neighborhood of hollywood hills. when we checked in earlier you showed us a home that slid into a street. it was in tatters. >> reporter: this is the street that leads up to that. it is basically become several currents of almost many rivers along the size of these roads. they've come down to one lane at this point. this is across the hollywood hills. up here is where you have the homes coming off places like their foundation. i'm going to show you this is the direction where it was. you see we have crews working on a tree that has fallen into

a house. further up you have four different homes. we can take you closer and video. we've been asked to move back because of exposure of the gas lines. the video shows you this one house that went off of its foundation. a massive mudslide almost like a ski slope of mud that came down crashing pushing it into four other homes causing damage. wiping six cars out of their parking spots. and covering several of them in several feet of mud right now. the fortunate part of all of this is that one home that was most severely destroyed was on unoccupied. the other ones had families inside. it was about 2:00 in the morning and pitch black. they saw a home in the middle of the street and the car started to come together to figure out what do we do now. how do we assess to make sure everybody is okay? here with light up there able to start doing the cleanup. we drove into the area that has been the big concern. some of these exposed gas pipes. the reality that you've been mentioning the saturated soil. this could continue. the threat is still existing for many hours if not days from now. that gas one of many

dangerous situations like this. it's a few days for southern california. thank you so much. under three hours republican senate leaders are set to meet about the landmark bipartisan border bill that is dividing their party would lead to dramatic changes to immigration law for the first time in decades. among its mandates the sprawling $118 billion package would require shutting down the border if average daily migraine crossings exceed 5000 in a week. it would also provide billions in foreign aid. most of that going to ukraine along with humanitarian assistance to gaza and other crises. in a rare joint statement house republican leadership today declared the bill dead on arrival. following the lead of the republican presidential front- runner donald trump. let's get to cnn melanie on capitol hill with the latest. what is going to happen in the senate meeting that is scheduled for later today?

>> reporter: this is going to be a critical meeting. we could see some fireworks given how high the tensions are inside the gop right now. delete negotiators of the package are planning to brief senator slater on the contents of the proposal. specifically planning to highlight some of the conservative policy wins when it comes to the border security portion of this package. they also want to combat what they say has been misinformation about what these provisions would actually do. but alex the window of potential yes votes inside the gop is rapidly closing. this bill is not even 24 hours old and already based on our count we've done with our hill team they are already over 20 senators who are opposed to this package. remember they need 60 votes in the senate in order for this bill to survive a procedural vote. even if it does this bill is dead on arrival in the house.

speaker mike johnson has been saying for weeks this is a nonstarter for him and his conference. just little bit ago he explained to reporters why he is opposed to the package. border patrol agents officers longtime veterans of the agency and they said you have to fix -- you have to end the catch and release. the mass release of immigrants around the country. illegals around the country. you have to restore you also need elegance of the wall being built. i don't believe the senate bill as i have explained meets the criteria necessary to solve the problem. >> >> reporter: the speaker did not mention donald trump. but the former presidents opposition to this bill no doubt has had an impact on the number of republicans were now saying they are opposed to the package. at this point just very hard to imagine how this bill becomes law. it is hard to imagine months of work that may not actually pay all. thank you very much. rosa florez who is at the border in eagle pass texas. that has been ground zero in the recent surge of border crossings. what are people there saying

about this border bill? >> reporter: what they are saying is it is personal for them. i just talked to an individual here who says he grew up on the rio grande. he grew up canoeing in the rio grande that you see behind me. all of a sudden this razor wire went up a lot of the area along the river was bulldozed. and so it is personal. people here are hurting. what jesse flynn has told me the individual i talked to, he says that he supports the bill not that he supports everything that is in the bill. but that he supports it because it is something. it is republicans and democrats coming together and agreeing on something. and because he hopes that if this border bill does indeed pass through congress, then all of this razor wire that you see here in eagle pass will be lifted. i asked him what about

president donald trump former president donald trump who has been lobbying against the bill. here's what he said. former president trump is lobbying against this border bill. if it does not go through, do you blame president trump? >> of course. without any hesitation. because this is a gold mine for them. this is what he wants to run on. but what would happen if it gets results? what is he going to complain about? >> reporter: now alex jesse flint said that he really hopes that if this border bill goes forward if something happens that all this wire is removed. back to you. so many people's lives so many communities are impacted by these decisions made in washington. thank you so much for that reporting. next the white house

refuses to publicly rule out future strikes within iran. as it retaliates for that deadly drone attack in jordan. an update on our breaking news. buckingham palace revealing king charles cancer diagnosis. stay with us.

an update on our breaking news. the revelation from buckingham

palace king charles iii has cancer. they declined to say what kind it is. max foster is in london. you've been talking to sources since the news broke a short time ago. the king has already begun treatment. do we know how he is feeling? >> reporter: well i'm told he's in good spirits. he is pretty frustrated because he is basically confined to his home where he is receiving outpatient care. he could possibly be in the hospital but they don't expect that to happen. he has a specialist team he is working with. he is carrying out his official duties as usual in terms of the top level constitutional stuff. i'm told the prime minister it will still be having his weekly audiences with the king. he will still be doing the paperwork which is when we see him in public. the medical team advised him against that. that is it because he feels physically unable to do it.

it is because they are concerned being out and about can make him more vulnerable considering he's had this treatment for his enlarged prostate combined with a separate diagnosis of cancer. not prostate cancer i'm told. something separate they discovered off the back of the procedure on his prostate. i think what they are looking at is between carrying on with her official public duties. supporting the king when he was in hospital last she was in there every day seeing helen. she will be spending time with him. prince william also carrying out the duties as well. just to show the public that the monarchy is ticking along. the constitution still holds together. of course without the king's ability to sign off on key government moments the whole system grinds to a halt. that isn't a concern. i will say i consult the counselors of state members of the family he would step in for him if he became incapacitated. they have not been appointed. we would be told if that were the case. that is where it would get

serious. it may just indicate he is going under anesthetic for a procedure that might not be too much of a worry. they would have to tell the public. do we know when and how we make it updates on the king's condition? >> reporter: so no running commentary is the word i keep being told. i think they will tell us when there is something significant happens. if he gets much better or if he gets much worse. the public has a right to know that. they are not going to drill down into exactly which type of cancer he's got her which type of treatment he's got. he's got the best possible expertise on hand. very interesting to see how they handle this with this revelation by not providing the details. max foster at buckingham palace thank you for all of your reporting. we are getting new details about a blistering u.s. military campaign and the middle east.

u.s. central command says that forces struck iran rebels on sunday. they destroyed some anti-ship and land detect cruise missiles. those attacks took place a day after a joint u.s. uk operation bombed 36 targets across yemen. and two days after the u.s. launched a punishing assault on iranian backed militia groups in iraq. and syria. retaliatory strikes over the depths of those three u.s. soldiers that were killed in jordan in the previous month. the state department said moments ago or rather the state department said moments ago iraq was not given events notice before those attacks were carried out. today u.s. secretary of state is making his way around the middle east trying to ease tensions in the region. while the un security council is set to meet in the next hour about the escalating situation. let's discuss with former defense secretary under president trump mark esper. he is the author of the book a

sacred oath memoirs of a secretary of defense during extraordinary times. secretary thank you for being with us. do you think that this response from what you've seen so far achieves the u.s. objective to deter and prevent a wider and conflict? >> reporter: good afternoon boris it is good to be with you. i think the straightforward answer is no. i was hopeful on friday night i was on cnn and we were talking about this. i was encouraged by the fact 85 targets were struck. central command mentioned attacking iranian forces. my expectations were high. we now found out three or four days later that no iranians were killed. we don't really have heard much bda with regards to the iranian sites. on top of that we've had three attacks by shia militias since then. clearly deterrence is not worked. you hear from senior administration officials anonymously saying we have degraded their capability.

my recollection was that was the purpose going into the strikes. the purpose was to deter iran and its proxies. at this point in time i don't think they've achieved the success they set out to. about a week ago. you mentioned the response that we've seen from some proxy groups. the defense secretary said the strikes are the start of our response. what are your thoughts on what we might see come next?>> i think you have to go attack things iran values. what they value are their own people and leaders. they value iranian sites outside of iran. if you want to increase the intensity of attacks you could attack iranian vessels or oil platforms. they are not going to be deterred if you attack the proxy groups. this is their strategy. it has been their strategy for 40+ years. it is why we are having to deal with hamas and gaza attacking israel. hezbollah attacking israel from southern lebanon.

the houthis. this is 40 years. they don't care about the proxy groups. they are only an extension of the acts of resistance. if you want to deter iranian behavior and the behavior of proxy groups you have to start attacking things that iran values. one of those things will be iranian things. i am curious to get your perspective on this bit of reporting that according to the state department the u.s. government did not give the government of iraq a heads up this attack was coming. this contradicts what we initially heard from national security council spokesman john kirby about this. do you think this is a miscommunication or perhaps a sign that there is tension between parts of the iraq he government in the united states that has led to a level of distrust? >> definitely. i had to deal with this as well. the strikes we made in late december 2019 early 2020 i caught the iraq he president

minutes before we were making our attacks to give him a heads up. clearly he was not happy it wasn't done sooner. we also knew that the iraq he government's compromise. iranians were in there at least iraq he was sympathetic to the iranian cause. so we knew whatever we told the iraq he government will be passed along to the iranians. i don't know whose telling the truth. clearly the iraq he government has been compromised. i'm curious secretary when you say that the u.s. should strike iranian things to deter iran. are you calling for a direct strike on iran? >> i've said repeatedly i would not begin by striking targets in iran. i would begin by a striking targets outside iran that they value. i go back to iranian leaders -- of the i rgc islamic revolutionary guard corps. iranian sites outside of iran

and iraq and syria. i would work my way up that escalation letter until iran stopped endorsing supporting and siding the proxy behavior. or until they message privately that they were done. they did not want to go further. that would be my view. otherwise we should accept these attacks will continue. we are at 168 now over the last four months. we've responded less than sometimes. otherwise you've got to accept that will continue. we will be at this whack a mole game for the next several months. former defense secretary mark expert. thanks. coming up a verdict to set a new precedent for who can be held responsible in a mass shooting. we will head to michigan were jury is deliberating the fate of jennifer connelly the mother of the oxford high school shooter. jennifer crumley.

happening now six men and six women are deliberating the fate of jennifer crumbley. she is the michigan mom whose son shot and killed four of his high school classmates at oxford high classmates back in suwanee 21. that is when the shooting happened. she's the first parent to be tried for a deadly school shooting carried out by their child. the jury sent to nose to the judge with questions about witnesses and evidence. whether or not there are different ways to convict

jennifer crumbley. she faces four counts of involuntary manslaughter. prosecutors painted her is an unfit mother with ignored signs of her son's mental distress. but saw no problem giving him a gun. jean is waiting the verdict outside the county courthouse. two questions thus far from the jury. what does that tell you particularly the one asking about other ways to convict? >> reporter: they are in depth questions. they go to the heart of the matter. this jury has been deliberating almost 6 hours. here's the first question. the prosecution is proceeding on to theories of involuntary manslaughter. and a juror can select either one. beyond a reasonable doubt. they have to believe it. they don't have to be unanimous in what theory they are looking at. so one is that jennifer acted with gross negligence. and causing the deaths of the four students at oxford high

school. in other words she saw there was a risk that her son could commit bodily harm against others. she did not do anything. she allowed it to happen and that is gross negligence. the other one is that legal duty. that under the state laws of michigan you as a parent have a legal duty that you must prevent your child from causing harm to others. and that jennifer crumbley was aware of an issue with her son. she did nothing. she could've used ordinary care to stop something from happening and she did not. and that caused the mass shooting at oxford high school. so the judge really said here are the jury instructions. to theories. go back and deliberate. then another question. this one is interesting. the jury asked can we infer some things of evidence that did not come into the trial about how the shooter that would be ethan crumbley, got the gun ? meaning got the gun to commit the mass shooting.

here are the facts that we know. we know that jennifer crumbley left for work that day. she was gone. ethan and his father were at the house. ethan's father took him to school that day. the video of the father dropping him off. but we do not know how he got that gun and put it in his backpack. conceivably there is only one person who knows that and it is ethan crumbley. and he did not testify because he asserted along with his attorneys the fifth amendment right against self- incrimination. so much for this jury to debate in michigan. thank you for all of your reporting throughout. quiet luxury is out something called loud budgeting is in. we will tell you about this new viral trend that apparently started as a joke. stay with us.

two leading candidates for senate. two very different visions for california. steve garvey, the leading republican, is too conservative for california. he voted for trump twice and supported republicans for years, including far right conservatives. adam schiff, the leading democrat, defended democracy against trump and the insurrectionists. he helped build affordable housing, lower drug costs, and bring good jobs back home. the choice is clear. i'm adam schiff, and i approve this message. this ad? typical. politicians... "he's bad. i'm good." blah, blah. let's shake things up. with katie porter. porter refuses corporate pac money. and leads the fight to ban congressional stock trading. katie porter. taking on big banks to make housing more affordable. and drug company ceos to stop their price gouging. most politicians just fight each other. while katie porter fights for you. for senate - democrat katie porter. i'm katie porter and i approve this message.

being on a budget isn't exactly the height of cool. it might depend on how you say it. it is part of a new trend on social media called loud budgeting. vanessa explains. >> reporter: in an online world where opulence is king. this was a joke. swimming loud budgeting is a new concepts i'm introducing for 224. it is the opposite of quiet luxury. if your friend takes you i want to hang out you say i don't want to spend gas money. i'm coming to you to hear about you talk about your ex for 3 hours. >> reporter: inadvertently started a new financial trend. what is loud budgeting?

>> loud budgeting is new terminology for people to use when they don't want to spend money. i think it is a time people can use that does not make talking about money awkward. >> reporter: the joke took off with more than 600,000 tick- tock followers financial influencers and even himself. were you surprised by how many people have related to it? >> yes. only because and i would love to say i'm a genius economist. but this is a concept that has been around. i think the loud part in front of it is what people are drawn to. >> reporter: jin z millennials especially feel the burden of inflation expensive housing and student loan payments. budgeting has been around since the beginning of time. but in just the four weeks since battle came out with loud budgeting more and more people are feeling they now have permission to talk about it.>> what you think about being transparent the fact you are on a budget?

>> i think more so it should be normalized. about budgeting and saving. >> reporter: what you think so many are resonating with it? >> because for so long we have been shamed into silence. loud budgeting is amazing because instead of having to hide and be ashamed about the fact you have debt or need a budget or want to say for certain things in your life you can proudly say them and share them with your friends. >> reporter: generation z millennials social media's most active users were either entering the job market for working with the pandemic hit. despite having the lowest financial literacy of any generation, recent economic uncertainty has made them the hungriest for information.>> with the social media vacation of society, keeping up with the joneses is no longer the joneses. we are keeping up with the kardashians.

we are starting to get visualizations of wealth that most rectal people will never see in their lives. if i'm a young person and i'm in an environment where i feel it will be challenging for me to succeed i want to arm myself with as much information as i possibly can to give myself a leg up. >> reporter: that makes it cool to talk about money. not just on social media. >> i decided -- and economists. which means i'm going to have to push -- janet yellin out of office. >> reporter: loud budgeting actually fits into a larger trend that we see on tick-tock. something called -- this is essentially a community of millions actually billions of people who are looking for financial advice on tick-tock. and people who are getting financial advice. it is everyone from your really great budgeting's stay at home mom to a financial advisor. the key here is to make sure

that you cross-reference any financial advice you find on the internet with a news source a study or research or talking to a certified professional. >> take my word for it you can't believe everything you read on the internet. i have some accounts i have to start following. thank you. we are back in just moments.

will will will will will will

in san francisco, two people a day are dying from fentanyl. this is a national crisis that demands new strategies. prop f requires single adults receiving cash assistance to enroll in treatment if they use drugs. i know what it's like to lose family to drug addiction. it's too late for some families. but our city needs to do what's necessary to save lives. please vote yes on prop f. xfinity rewards presents: '1st and 10gs.'

xfinity is giving away ten grand what' to a new lucky winnerves. for every first and ten during the big game. enter daily through february 9th for a chance to win 10gs. with the ultimate speed, power, and reliability the xfinity 10g network is made for streaming live sports. because it's only live once. join xfinity rewards on the xfinity app or go to xfinity1stand10gs.com for your chance to win. retired new york firefighter bob beckwith who stood with president bush in the rubble after the 9/11 terror attacks. he has passed away. this was an iconic image. he was retired at the time to talk his way through several checkpoints to search for survivors and carry out debris. he was 91 years old. the lead with jake tapper