>> nationally cnn's poll of poll suggests vice president kamala harris and former president donald trump are running near even in the weight race for the white house. here's a slight edge at 40% to trump's 47%. and then you got the cnn poll of polls in the battleground states. it's all marching your territory. a tight race that could go either way. in three runs for the presidency trump has never been in this strong of a position , according to the polls. even though you wouldn't say he's leading. in 2016 the polls were predicting a hillary victory . 5:38 had her up by three nationally on this day, november 22nd, -- november 2nd, 2016. in 2025 38 had biden up by almost 8.5, 51.8 to trump's

43.4. once the final numbers came in hillary clinton did when the popular vote by 2%, but lost the election. biden did beat trump in the popular vote, yes, but it wasn't by 8.5 nationally, it was by 4.5. it's enough to raise this question, or trump's numbers underreported yet again? if they are he wins. or have pollsters adjusted , accounting for the so-called hidden trump voters? what about shy harris voters? could they tip the balance? justin brown writing in political said, it has taken pollsters eight years to pin down trump's voters . is 100 days really enough to accurately capture potential harris voters? these voters are not necessarily shy with their support for kamala harris. instead, the question is whether they are being overlooked by current polling methods. polling data expert nate silver shows a close race, accusing many pollsters of hurting to ensure their predictions are too far off from other predictions.

>> we didn't learn too much in this last week of pulling. i kind of trust pollsters less. oh, every day just a plus one. every state is a tie. no, you are cheating. your numbers aren't going to come out at one point leads when you survey 800 people over dozens of surveys. you are lying. you're putting her leap finger on the skill. >> silvers own electoral college probability has trump overtaking harris with a 53.8% likelihood , 45.8% for harris in order to return to the white house. the other nate, nate cohen, chief political analyst for the new york times cautions and says recent changes add up to a case of cautious optimism on better accuracy, but that is far from a guarantee. what other indicators do we have? the betting markets show trump with more than a 50% likelihood of beating harris. that fear

has about 63%, poly market -- giving him a 52% shop. is it because the pro vote is laying a lot of crypto on him? who knows. on the other hand, the stock market has been on a tear, of 10% since august. this would suggest a here is victory. the stock market has been a strong indicator of whether income a party's candidate will retain control of the white house , correctly forecasting all but four presidential races over the last 96 years. and then culturally speaking there's an odd push , a ted lasso world, optimistic and kind versus a yellowstone world where grit and machismo dominate. these cultural touchstones may signal the public's mind-set as much as any other survey. i'm continually asked when i just television viewers and radio listeners, but many friends and family you things going to win the election? my answer is, i don't know. ahead says trump my gut says harris. i just don't know. more important, of course, is that we all get out and vote. and remember this,

election date is a massive, massive undertaking . stuff happens. don't draw conclusions from any singular report of irregularity. president obama's former speech writer wrote these words, each location will experience nearly double the daily foot traffic of your average starbucks. not only that, but every one of these approximately 116,000 stores will be a pop-up remaining open for just one day and closing for good at night by the way, more than 900,000 votes , voters will be woefully underpaid . that is election day in america. okay? remember the way we structure our campaigns but once here this apparatus comes together and if there are irregularities it doesn't mean there is widespread fraud. i want to know what you think go go to my website and answer today's poll question. what will be wednesday's headline? harris ekes out a victory, harris wins decisively trump ekes out a victory, trump wins decisively?

race too close to call. join me now three men who knows what it takes to make or break a campaign. democratic strategist the ragin' cajuns, james carville. the man behind bill clinton's 1992 campaign victory, the focus of a new seen in film, carville. winning is everything, stupid. in theaters now. released on max on november 14th . cnn senior political commentator and former senior adviser to president obama, david axelrod is here. the x-files just hit its 600th episode by the way, i'm a guest in one of those. republican cumbersome and trump campaign surrogate byron donalds back with us as well. david, i want to begin with you. what a crazy final week . the comedian at madison square garden, the biden garbage comment, adding an apostrophe to change the intent on that comment. mark cuban on women around trump you had trump saying guns are trained on the face of liz cheney. what would

happen. so many more that i'm forgetting. did any of it make a difference? >> yeah. i kind of think it does. there are a lot of people out here living their lives not just focusing on the race. the question is how do you close the race? and in the main i think that harris has been more disciplined in her closing . i have said many times that the trump campaign itself, it's advertising and general locking and tackling has been very professional and very well conceived . the problem is there candidate, who takes them off message in his two hour stand-ups. so they never can punch through with the message they have. with byron donalds, he's a talking point machine. you can't blast him off his talking points with a bulldozer. this candidate needed a little more of that this week, because i think between the rally on sunday and

some of his other comments, certainly the liz cheney comment, he is taking the campaign off of the message they want to deliver. >> byron donalds, respond to that. >> first, i don't know whether to be happy or upset about what david said. trying to stay away from talking points. i speak the facts as i see them. i think at the end of this race all of the stuff that has been dusted up over the last week is really not going to matter much. i think the core issues in the country will remain the same. this has been an economy that for working families that have struggled because of high inflation. the year-over-year number might be down, but the cumulative effect over the last four years has been disastrous for them. immigration still a real issue all throughout the united states. and voters in mass do want the border security. they want some level of deportations to occur. but if you talk about last week, in terms of the comments that have been made, i think what people are also starting to see is some of the gross

mischaracterizations and in some respects the equivalency , depending if you're talking about president trump versus president biden or a comic versus mark cuban . this relativism on how to plate those comments to me doesn't really measure up. you can't compare -- >> my hunch is -- >> you simply cannot. >> james, my hunch is that it's all noise and that it all canceled each other out. this is what i most want to ask the ragin' cajuns. what happened to persuasion? when and how did we become all about motivation and nobody's trying to convince anybody to switch sides or win them over? >> on one hand we have an apostrophe. we don't know if it was there or not there. on the other hand, someone wants to use the military to arrest their political opponent. let's mull on, why would somebody cut the other hand off and do themselves a favor? if we are going to post here, and i don't see in the

constitution on the ballot. somebody needs to tell the public that. okay? it would be nice. we've got to talk about the apostrophe. and then we got to talk about jail and opponents. really, those are two equal things in modern american society. >> byron donalds, that's for you. and then i'm going to ask david axelrod a question. go ahead, byron. >> simple response would be, if you're going to talk about jailing opponents that something that has come out of the harris biden administration. last time i checked it was the department of justice by their special counsel's that have been trying to jail donald trump on a myriad of issues. when donald trump was president he didn't turn the department of justice on his political rivals. he did not do that. if you're going to talk about the comments about whether the national guard is deployed, remember the question in the context. it was if there's unrest in the country post election a post-inauguration if donald trump is to be victorious would

he use the national guard to protect citizens? his answer was yes he would. i think that this is where the narrative building has been grossly mistaken and misleading to the american public to bring emotions into our elections where the emotions simply don't need to exist . >> david acker rock -- axelrod, get in on this. >> first of all, if trump is president -- it wasn't for lack of trying, it was because there were people in the justice department and in his own counsel's office who intervened and prevented that. it certainly was his impulse to do that. he said throughout this campaign that he wants to do that. just getting back to the campaign itself , you know, i said that harris has been disciplined and trump has not been disciplined . the harris message, really is i am focused on the problems of people here are my ideas to help people ,

you know, who are looking for affordable housing, who want to start a small business, who are worried about caring for an elderly parent there are things we can do to help. and he is so busy with his enemies list and his vengeance that he will never get around to the problems of people, because at the end of the day donald trump is about donald trump. and the way he is behaving this week reinforces her message , which is why i think it's more than noise. i think it actually has strengthened her closing argument. >> james carville, who is hiding? are there hidden trump voters? you look at all the data, are they underestimating harris' poll? how do you read the data? >> i can't let something go unsaid. maybe i dreamed this. i'm getting old, so my memory is not good. i do think i remember trump saying he would tell his political opponents. and then his flunkies went out and said, no, that's not what

he really meant . and then he came back and said, yes, that's what i really mean. why his own director of national intelligence thinks that he has compromised, the kremlin has blackmail on him. for god sakes, let's talk about the apostrophe, because that's what's coming down today. i don't know if there are hidden trump voters or not. the constitution of the united states of america is on the ballot this coming tuesday . and i think it's time for people to start acting like it . that's my own personal opinion. >> i'm trying to keep it fair. my questions today are apparently meaningless. byron donalds, back to you. you got the opportunity now to respond to james. quickly though. >> a quick response is that, like i said before, donald trump was president and he didn't do any of these things go his it ministration did not do that. if you look at the harris campaign you can make the argument, yes, she is disciplined, but it's also overly scripted. she's trying to distract from her agenda and from her record as vice president serving with joe

biden. that's what voters are concerned about more than anything else. they are comparing the last two presidential administrations. it's without a doubt donald trump had a more successful presidency for the american people. if you're going to talk about the constitution it was a biden-harris administration that spied on the american people during covid-19 and suppressed free speech of the american people using the weight of the white house to do so. that has been documented by house investigations if we're going to talk about the constitution, let's really talk about it . it's also -- >> we are going to take a time-out. >> -- that has ignored the supreme court when it came to student loan bailouts. >> we are ready to come back with my special guest and talk about campaign strategy and potential paths to get to 270 electoral college votes. hit me up on social media and i will read responses throughout the program. this came in thus far, has or ever been an election with two candidates that were less qualified? and insurrectionist felon versus a never won a primary bait and

switch replacement? it's a 50-50 race. do you know what i'm wondering? i'm wondering if this might be my poll question tomorrow, things seem like they are so entrenched and so divided that i'm wondering if president biden were still the candidate with the numbers be exactly the same? my hunch is that they would. want to know we think. go to my website and answer today's poll question. what would be wednesday's headline? harris ekes out a victory, harris wins decisively, trump ekes out a victory, trump wins decisively? which one is the most wind and unexpected? we will talk about that.

back now with my all-star panel. james, duck sauce think is a very bright guy. you have president bill clinton in common. here's something you just wrote for the new york times. i'm going to ask you to react. the reason for such a dead even race is that the deep divisions in our country are all but impermeable to events surrounding the campaign, including the historic turmoil of 2024 . that is why biden was virtually tied with trump in many polls before their june debate, even though the president had an abysmal job approval rating in the 30s and 70% of americans thought the country was headed in the wrong direction. that is why trump's standing in the polls has not

changed, despite becoming a convicted felon and constantly making statements that are flat out lies that is why harris, who has raised over $1 billion and has heavily outspent trump and won virtually every news cycle and dominated the debate is running at best only even in national and swing state polling. i should also add that was all part of a piece that he published , saying in the end it's trump who has more paths to 270. james , reaction. >> first of all, i'm not sure it's going to be that close. by the way, my ears, i didn't dream this, donald trump actually did say he would tell his opponents. he said, yes, i really mean it. he also said his domestic lyrical opponents -- that is the level we are dealing with here. you tell me the path to this, the path to that, we are on the path to end

the constitution and the man is telling us right to the face , we have apologists out there trying to tell us we didn't see or hear exactly what we saw and heard. that's a fact. >> david axelrod, does donald trump have more paths to 270 then kamala harris? >> probably. probably. and james may be right, because all of these battleground states are so close that if they break together someone could end up with a big electoral victory. but i still believe , michael, you are sitting at ground zero they are in pennsylvania. and at the candidate who wins pennsylvania will win this election. one of the things that has become clearer, i think, as we close down this race is that what we thought in the beginning, you know, apropos to what selznick wrote, what we think in the beginning is going to be true in the end at the blue wall states are

going to tell the story . pennsylvania, michigan and wisconsin . and they are all very, very close. if she wins all three, if the vice president, david axelrod, wins all three, we have a graphic that displays this, if she takes the three blue wall states then she's right at 270. assuming everything else breaks the way that it is expected. >> yes. well, now, if she takes all three , including , and then wins the omaha district , she will be at 270. the omaha district that biden won. remember, there are two states in the country that elect electors by congressional district nebraska is one . republicans there try to change it. they couldn't get the votes in the legislature to do it before the election. and it's likely that she will win that seat in omaha . if she does , the question is will

there be an attempt after that to change the rules before the electors vote on december 14th? i wouldn't put that out of the question. i think trump is going to do everything possible to win this race. he's got more at stake than just the presidency. he's facing all of these legal problems. you know, i think that is something to watch. yes. i think that at the end of the day she will win the election, if she wins those three states . and she will win 270 electoral votes. not impossible that she could win some of the sun belt states. they are going to be close. but they were worked as haveli during the biden campaign, because he didn't see them as a path. the harris campaign has been playing catch-up there. >> congressman byron donalds, why has former president trump not asked nikki haley , governor haley, to come out and participate in the campaign where she seems willing to do

so? >> look, i think that when you're talking about that dynamic it's incumbent on people who want to come into the campaign and help him up for them to reach out to the president and his team first, not the other way around. that's just the way i see it there's a lot of republican surrogates who have been calling into the campaign. myself included. i called them . i don't wait for them to call me. they are busy and trying to make sure that the message is tied to their focus on the dated that they are getting the message out to voters and they are turning out to vote. to your broader question about the past, if kamala harris loses one of the blue wall states this thing is over. i actually tend to think , my gut is, it's tight . my head tells me that i think all these battleground states begin to break the same way, because your voting population that is undecided is dealing with the same question in front of them. it's basically do i believe the rhetoric around donald trump or the reality of the

failures of kamala harris and joe biden? >> to the issue of the nonuse of nikki haley, i'm going to put up on the screen something that displays the divide between men without a college education and women with a college degree. it's the largest demographic gap in all the polling that i've seen. 43 points. let me try to say it more clearly. the gap between men without a college degree and women with a college degree , 43 points. i don't know, gentlemen, who has return and who doesn't. trust me, that's what the data shows. james carville, respond to that . and to the way in which harris is doing so well with women with a college degree, but trump has got the edge of men who lack a college degree. >> what about men with a college degree? that's a pretty key demographic here. i'm sorry. not all people with a college degree are women. i think men with a college degree are going --

>> +7. >> -- simply because they tend to be more pro- choice than men without a college degree. they also have something to lose in this economy. i think we have that upside down. >> ask, do you have a response to that gender and educational divide? >> i think there are a few things. at the very basic level, if she wins among women by an equal or larger margin then trump wins among men, she will win the election. women vote in larger numbers. i think that's one of the questions here, are there republican women who are going to pull for her on the basis of abortion and some of the issues that james has raised? so, but there is no doubt, this has been a long-term trend . you know this. democrats in the last several cycles have done relatively poorly among noncollege men and noncollege white voters. noncollege white

men, noncollege white voters. this is nothing new. the truth is she's doing better among white voters, generally, because of the votes of college-educated voters. i just want to say one thing about what byron said. the question is, not whether people believe the rhetoric about donald trump. it's whether they believe donald trump's rhetoric. james is right. throughout this campaign he has talked about punishing his enemies . he has talked about his political enemies is the enemy within. he has talked about using the military against american citizens. and so, the question is, do you believe him? and is this what he's going to be spending his time on when his president? what does that portend for the country? that's one of the things holding him back in this election. the choice between the temperament and the values or lack of values or whatever you want to call them, of donald trump . and whatever questions people have about

biden and the biden administration . and whether they think she is going to bring change from it. i think that's the big debate going on here. >> congressman, fairness demands you get the final word. take 30 seconds. >> all i would say is that i think the reason my kamala harris is going to lose this election is because i think voters are going to give her an opportunity to say what she would do. like she famously said on the view, not much would change. nothing really comes to mind voters are scratching their head behind that. the word salad doesn't work. the empty phrases do not work. people want concrete answers to what is ailing them in this country. she has not provided that. donald trump has. that's why the change candidate is donald trump and that's why i believe he's going to win in three days. >> byron -- byron donalds, david axelrod, james carville, thanks to all three of you. let's see what some of the social media reaction is. we've

got this, election cycle go down in history is probably the wildest ever. netflix documentary coming soon. laugh out loud. i'm awaiting the publication of an editorial cartoon book. i know exactly what you're saying. it's an editorial cartoon book that retells the story. not selling any books. they are all sold out. i just thought you would find interesting. we are waiting until the final chapter before we can print it. the reason we are doing it to raise money for great charity. also, to just tell the story visually of the nuttiest, tumultuous, fill in the blank, election cycle of the modern era. i want remind you, go to my website and answer today's poll question. what will be wednesday's headline? i'm giving you four different scenarios. by the way, catherine, my producer, does not like that i give you four choices. she said, can you simplify it? not enough people will vote if you've got four choices. no, they're going to vote. don't let me down.'s here's going to eke out a victory , is here's going to win decisively? is trump going

to eke out a victory, is trump going to win decisively? or on wednesday will we be saying it's too close to call? still to come, you social media reaction to my commentary, plus what is the key factor keeping both candidates from sealing the deal with voters. we will dig into the main obstacle both campaigns face as a scramble to secure that critical last-minute support. a sun of the newsletter when your voting on today's poll question. steve granger this for us this week. two right cartoons, as a matter of fact.

everybody is at a fever pitch. a lot of social media this week. we will have guaranteed delays due to their inability to decipher mail-in ballots. kelly and referring to me, saying that i'm actually doing my radio program tuesday from what i regard as the most important town in the most important county and the most important state, happens to be where i was born and raised, doylestown, pennsylvania. it's true that the legislature hasn't to my satisfaction resolved some of the issues relative to mail-in ballots. that the whole issue of, and i voted this way, on the exterior of the envelope if you mistakingly list the date your ballot could be disqualified. notwithstanding that there's a bar code system . in fact, i got an email and it told me exactly when they received my

ballot. is it a perfect system? it is not a perfect system. and it could go on for a while, because also in pennsylvania we don't allow the pre-canvassing of ballots. they can't touch them and work on them until election morning. imperfect. imperfect, for sure. but not indicative of fraud or chicanery of any kind. which is why i made that point earlier in the program. stuff happens. it's the nature of the way that we run our elections. doesn't mean there's widespread fraud. so be ready for complaints that say that there is . that are not supported by the evidence. sorry, i got long-winded. one more. maybe even two. are any states up for grabs besides the swing states? i love that question. i am of the opinion, you are then going to say to me, which one? it's got to be a surprise out there. there's got to be a surprise out there. i can't believe that it's all going to be with this machinelike precision this is what the pollsters told us and is going to come down to these seven this is what the pollsters told us and is going to come down to these 7 and the

other 43 are all, you know, as anticipated. i wouldn't be surprised if there were a sleeper out there. maybe more than one. that would be a good thing. another , pardon me, social media response. what we have? kamala harris has the hidden voters. the trump supporters are so outspoken we just don't engage them or let our intentions be known, especially -- can i say something about that? so, i had a conversation yesterday on my radio program talking about yard signs. and are they suggestive of election outcome? had academic from high point university. he was terrific dr. lenore was his name. anyway. a caller calls my show. says i've been driving all over the eastern seaboard and i noticed a pattern that when there is that house, and we have all seen that house, that is totally festooned with trump paraphernalia and signs there aren't many harris signs around. otherwise, there are lots of signs. meaning, or people's intimidated by the one in the neighborhood that is

just over the top and it quite's the rest of the community? that's part of the theory that it's actually here is who is underrepresented in the polls. we are going to find out in three days. with the election conclusion, as i say, three days away we are going to discuss the closing strategy of each campaign with an expert in a moment. don't forget to vote on today's poll question. by the way, are you voting as a prognosticator, which is what i'm asking ? or are you voting what you are looking for ? i hope the former, not the latter. how's it going to end? i've got four different scenarios for you . and you can vote as you see fit.

the final stretch of this high-stakes election, neither campaign wants to be in the water, sugar, what a vortex. the harris campaign has their loser focused on defending democracy missed the mark. my next guest write about how this could cost the democrats the election. she argues voters are turning to issues that hit close to home, like the economy and this shapes perception and might explain why donald trump is neck and neck with vice president harris across the polls, despite his history of challenging democratic institutions. let's bring in dr. lauren wright, a research scholar and lecture in political science at princeton university and author of star

power, american democracy in the age of celebrity candidate. is that the argument, dr. wright, the maybe her focus should have been more on the economy in the final days of the campaign not so much on democracy, as my prior guest, david ask you, department, james carville, was making the pitch? >> absolutely. i would say that along with my coauthor, sean westward at dartmouth, that should have been the case since january. biden opened his campaign famously on the risk to democracy and the fact that the country itself was at risk. and democracy is simply something amorphous, it's open to interpretation . about 55% of republicans think harris is a threat to democracy , for instance. and they care so much more about other issues. the economy and inflation , especially. as your last guest, david axelrod said famously, people sitting around the table talking about democracy probably don't have to worry

about the food sitting on the table. that is the crux of this election. it's the top of every poll. and voters are very, very angry about the biden/harris economy. >> given the wrong track numbers that i know you're familiar with, and the fact that inflation at a certain point hit 9% on the watch of vice president harris, let's switch now. why hasn't trump been able to close the deal? >> well, his mistakes and scandals are very well known . more than half of the country deeply disliked trump . polls have shown that very consistently. they know about january 6th they hold him responsible go cnn has some of the best polling on that. that shows he even alienated a segment of republicans on january 6. we know he is twice impeached he lost the last election and tried to stay in power. these are all very controversial things. but honestly, i think even if you look at harris' record on

democratic values, untruthfulness, on transparency she has got some real problems there too. not least of which is the way she replaced biden at the top of the ticket without a single vote being cast in the last three months of the election. i think these are very fair questions to ask. and i think they need to be scrutinized for both candidates. >> right, but that's not a detraction from her, right? the way in which she got the gig biden imploded at the debate. we all watched it. >> i disagree. >> you disagree? how so? >> i disagree. she is a sitting vice president and she has campaigned this entire time on how she was the last decision-maker in the room. she likes to say from the situation room to the oval office, i was one of the trusted voices on policy. and she has simultaneously held the position that she was a key player in the administration, which i absolutely think she was. i have data that shows she has been the most active vice president ever, by some

measures. and that when she is asked about the biden administration's controversial policies he is not on the ticket, that doesn't matter, don't ask about that, i'm on the ticket. yes, you are the candidate and it's fair to ask about those issues. her answers have been really inconsistent. including -- >> you -- i misunderstood. your argument is, i think, she should have spoken up about what she saw . >> absolutely. >> that's what you are saying. >> she hasn't given a consistent answer. i think those questions are very fair to ask. she said biden, he has had a great record, but she avoids the cognitive decline questions, which i think are relevant. >> give me the cliff notes version of what you are about to publish in the wall street journal. you say for different reasons there are problems with each. let me hear it. >> yes. i think both candidates, an argument can be

made, are unfit for office. donald trump lost an election in 2020 and he tried to hang onto power. that's quintessentially anti-democratic . it's quintessentially anti-american. but here is on the same issue of democracy, which she has urged voters to evaluate the candidates by, has defended , essentially what might be a shadow government in the biden administration. she can't say with a straight face that he is fit for office, because he was removed from the top of the ticket, which is an extraordinary event and replaced three months before the election. americans saw with their own eyes that debate back in june. that's why he is no longer the candidate. i also think on the policies she has defended and shown an openness to expanding the supreme court. that's exactly what hugo chavez did to seize power in venezuela. it's antidemocratic. she has shown her willingness to censor on

popular -- >> you realize -- dr. wright , you realize i will be the one who will bear the brunt of the nasty emails from people who are going to say that you are establishing parity between the two. do you really mean to say that they are equal threats to democracy ? i'm out of time, so make it fast. >> yeah. i will. i don't think, you know, i think voters will make different decisions about that. but i don't think we should judge each other. i think there's a very strong argument to be made that on this question of democracy truthfulness and transparency , they have serious problems . and is not as easy as pundits have made it out to be. there is not one clear patriotic candidates and we should be open to each other's decisions and subjective and let stop calling each other fascists and enemies. >> i would imagine it's like something at princeton edu, right? if they want to reach out for you? i'm just joking.

i'm just joking. >> it is. i get emails all the time. thanks, michael. you still have time to vote on our poll today. make sure you are voting on this. what is the wednesday headline ? is somebody eking out a victory? is somebody winning decisively? or will the race be too close to call? go vote. sign up for the newsletter while you're there. the

clock . the yearly ritual dozens of states and some on our panel want to stop. the gang is here and ready to go, so sit back, relax and let's talk about it. up first with just three days to go until election day, kamala harris and donald trump are still locked at a dead heat, according to the latest cnn national poll. as they barnstorming this swing states

donald trump has been focusing on his mail, megabase. ramping up inflammatory rhetoric , which some supporters fear will turn off women voters. >> she is a radical war hawk. let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, okay? >> donald trump taking aim at former republican congresswoman liz cheney. >> let's see how she feels about it. you know or the great guns are trained on her face. >> chaining -- cheney saying women will not be silent. >> i'm going to do it whether the women like it or not. i'm going to protect them. >> as election day nears trump has been appearing with controversial figures popular with young men who often trash talk kamala harris. >> her and her temperature handlers will destroy our country. >> add to that elon musk's throat trump super pac, which aired and then pulled an ad that word here's a c word after facing backlash. some of trump's female supporters fear his courting the, quote, bro

vote could backfire.