♪ who? that is the question many are stuck on tonight. unconventional pilotage and -- politicians do make some. he was in on your bingo card. you are actually not alone tonight. one telling cnn, quote, everyone is simply shocked. if you recognize him, it may be from fox news. he's been there for eight years and cohost a show on the weekend. there he is. he is a veteran who served in afghanistan and also iraq. he is been an informal adviser to trump for several years. one source says trump thinks he has, the look. it will require more than the look for tv personality with no government experience to run the most powerful military in the entire world. it is also curious when you factor in what trump told joe rogan. >> is very dangerous to pick

somebody outside of a politician. a politician has been basically vetted for years. you pick a business guy, and they've never been vetted at all. they are now the head of a big company or something, but they've never been vetted. you know nothing about his personal life, where he's been. it's a little bit dangerous. all of a sudden, they get checked out. you hear things and you say, wow. this is not going to work out. so it's dangerous. very dangerous. you know what else is very dangerous? the global hotspot thatwill he be dealing with the world. in ukraine, excuse me. the war, the aggression in the middle east, a more hostile china. needless to say, a lot on his plate. will he be up to the task? we will see about that. make no mistake, the stakes are incredibly high. but first, getting through the senate process. two people who won't need the confirmation of the senate, elon musk and vivek

ramaswamy. they have been picked for the new department of government efficiency. yep. i'm not joking. they are going to pronounce it -- it will mean -- as the department logo. i mean seriously, for real. it is kind of basically a task force tasked with giving advice and guidance. now if anyone ends up listening to that advice, the consequences could be very significant. especially considering what ramaswamy has already pledged to do. >> shut down the fbi, shut down the fcf, shut down the u.s. department of education, fire 75% of the federal bureaucrats in washington, d.c. and send them home packing, because they never should've had that job

in the first place. resend every unconstitutional federal regulation that congress never passed. fcc to fda to tsa. i call that 1000 standing around, by the way. god knows what. shut it down. >> what could possibly go wrong? muscat -- musk wants to find to cut from the federal budget. it could have catastrophic fallout. i'm talking about events and social security. even musk has acknowledged those risks. a quote, severe reaction and a market tumble in the near-term. he wrote this. sounds about right. time will tell how this will be carried out. and how musk will sort out all of his conflicts of interest. aside from those pics, trump has also

announced john radcliffe as his cia director. he has been a key loyalist working as director of national intelligence in terms first term. kristi noem got the nod to head the department of security. also, trump's borders are. they are also not senate confirmed. we will see what pics we will learn tomorrow. we've still got what? 56 whole minutes left of today. joining us now, former democratic congressman and undersecretary of the army, patrick murphy. former trump campaign official, brian. and national political correspondent, mark caputo. glad to have you all here. on this very point, patrick, the department of defense is enormous. we've got a budget of what? nearly 800 -- 850 barry lynn -- billion. of

course, does pete hegseth have the experience and maybe even the report to be able to lead? >> you know two things. one, the longest secretary of defense in american history was under president john f. kennedy. one of my favorite presidents of all time. as a fellow world war ii veteran, his name was robert -- age 44. pete hegseth, you might disagree with his politics, but he went to princeton. he went to harvard. he went to iraq, afghanistan, guantanamo bay. he's been a leading voice in my generation. i may disagree with him on policy. but let me tell you something, i do not question his overall country, overall troops. he takes an oath, his want to defend the constitution. loyalty to the president, he abides by that. keeps your family safe. the president. this is one of the reasons why elections have consequences. he can pick who he wants. make it does belong to trump. you've named one

from the jfk association. people like lloyd alston, a 41 year military career. commander of u.s. central command, a four-star general. if that mark, a 21 year military official. also, -- for three years. you are thinking about how they compare to this new pick. but don't take anything away from him, as you pointed out. he is a two time bronze star recipient. the accolades of government experience. john referred to his pick as a field the -- choice. do you have any concerns about how this will play out? not only in the confirmation, but also leaving the military as we know it? >> i don't think so. i've been involved in the confirmation process in 2016 as a communications director. we handled the media strategy. i think pete is going to go through the same scrutiny as everyone else. he will go through the same training. we will set up mock confirmations.

his record sounds really good to me. two ivy league degrees. we had a previous candidate. it is good that we are celebrating today. i think his service, his commitment to this country and commitment to president trump. he chose somebody he is comfortable with. he chose somebody who over the years, he has leaned on for advice. we will see whether he can manage the big bureaucracy. we know one thing, he loves this country. he's fought and defended this constitution. and we know he will give maximum effort to the people of the dod and give the best advice to the president. that's the best we can ask for. also with this 41 year experience, believe in afghanistan, all of those years of a experience led to this. you can have the experienced crew will have all of these things. it's good to get somebody outside, disruptive. you know, there was a book

about him where they referred to him and the whiz kids. i think he's very much in that line. >> and he's told him, i have no government experience except for serving in combat. but to the point, listen, i always want to be gracious in victory and defeat. i'm a proud democrat, but elections have consequences, right? he gets to pick who he wants. the republicans, they have the house, the senate. white house, supreme court. and then they are going to have to -- >> yeah, they've got all the marbles in that respect. reported tonight that his name was actually not on the political shortlist. they thought it could actually be real. not saying it was an onion headline, but just not real. what does this say about his decision process? >> the says donald trump will decide what he wants to decide when he decides it. right

before this one out i was told, hey, heads up. something is coming down the pike. we are just going to be seeing more of this out of the trump administration. this is the trump playbook. kind of big, splashy news that gets everyone chattering on twitter. i imagine this is probably the first in a long line of things we will see over the next four years. >> the actions of this, does this show that he is isolated? may be unilaterally decided who he wants as opposed to seeking the counsel of many people around him? mar-a-lago seems to be full of people leaning for influence. >> yes and no. it's one of those places where two things can be true at the same time. ultimately, he is the decider. very often, he seeks out different people. their arriving to the decision he wants to arrive at. in this pick, he's not. some guesses,

he will choose the guy he wants. others, he will leave it up to a counsel. but trump really despises what he calls this. i'm not saying it exists. but he is having a big problem with the generals, with the pentagon, the national security bureaucracy. this is the first in many disruptions you will see. i think the shot, the all, the surprise, the outside of the box pick is one of these things that is indicative of the way he will govern. >> speaking of departments they can be different, he is trumping elon musk and vivek ramaswamy to lead the new department of government efficiency, a.k.a. doge. i can make that up. doge. it sounds like their outside consultant has no real power. but they can't be right. >> listen, it's also important to understand the way government works. he has the envoy to climate change. so

that's the way if we are looking at that model, it exists already. you know, barack obama had them where they really didn't have a role of advisory. i think the difference, they are sort of man of actions. they will not come to the table of justice. it's like, this is what we viewed. and the best part, they will be reporting to residential, who is an executor. they will say, we've analyzed these things. we are just going to move forward. the typical bureaucratic process, you do interagency conversations and ultimately, nothing happens. he feels fully empowered to bring out the sharpie and clear the line. >> you see, president-elect trump is acting decisively. you know, it took a month for some of these positions. 40 years ago, i think he was picking people to help advise him. and

now he is telling people, this is what i need you to execute for me. and whether you like it or not, that is why you are seeing pics like marco rubio. so we will see this battle for folks want to shrink the pentagon. it will be an interesting four years. >> the power of -- it's going to spend. it will cost some money. and also trying to shave off the number of things. looking at the list that vivek ramaswamy listed off. it can cost more in the long run as well. if you don't have agencies, or even bureaucracies made up in this way. will congress go away with that? >> i think it makes sense. the security bounced budget --

balanced budgets. billions of dollars in taxpayer payments. the government could be more efficient. we know that. right? but will you ask folks to get after it? or is he going to say, i'm going to fire the folks in afg, union members that work at the va. that would be different. shave 2 trillion off a $5 trillion budget. we will see. this met we will see what is going on, as well. rick scott in his bid tomorrow for senate leader. he's holding an endorsement. why? >> well, the big thing for donald trump, can you win? can rick win? and the answer so far that have come back to him, probably not. so even though -- one of the things he doesn't really want to do, trump, he's busy doing the things that are causing us to talk about his

very wild and in some cases, out of the box. he doesn't want to get bogged down in the senate battle. in the end, he has sort of already won. by getting all of these guys -- rick scott was already there. but getting them to agree to allow him to have recess appointments, which would essentially bypass the entire appointment and nomination process in the senate. he's essentially gotten them proactively to give up power. that's something that didn't happen before. in the past in the senate, this would be considered a human rights violation. so trump kind of wins either way. and in the end, rick scott was sort of the focal him in which he leveraged these two other guys. >> thank you, everyone. up next, much more on donald trump's new pick to lead the

pentagon. including what he said about so-called woke generals. donald trump might have a plan to purge the military with just the stroke of a pen. and later, inside the daniel penny subway trial in new york. the initial story, telling the jury a new version of what he saw.

♪ ♪ with so much great entertainment out there... wouldn't it be easier if you could find what you want, all in one place? my favorites. get xfinity streamsaver with netflix, apple tv+, and peacock included, for only $15 a month.

it is one thing to have the ei inside of your university, but it's a whole another thing to have a society 101st airborne. you can move to a different state if you want to go to a different school. we only have one military. if the military goes woke, then this is less equipped. >> that is donald trump's pick for defense secretary. the now former hose, pete hegseth. a warrior against what he calls the, quote, military. hegseth says he knows the military will. he is also a graduate of princeton and -- director of an advocacy group for veterans. the washington post reports

that the group is backed by the koch brothers. hegseth also raised brows when he privately encouraged donald trump to pardon some servicemembers accused of war crimes. but he has no government experience. talk about this with congressman seth moulton, a democrat from massachusetts. welcome. let's get your reaction to this choice of hegseth . >> i think everyone is surprised. he wasn't on the list. he's not someone who has much experience. he served in the national guard. people are wondering what is he going to do? what is his agenda? all i know is that his agenda is clearly to politicize things. that's what he's known for. and he specifically focuses on politicizing the military. as someone who believes in the core american values, including making sure we have a military that is not politicized, that is not behaving like trump once. trump wants the hitler's

general model where they just do what they want, irrespective of morals or -- guidance. that's why he's picking hegseth. that's what we've got to be careful of. that's what those of us on the arms service community in congress are asking a lot of questions right now. >> i will see what is revealed. one question many are asking is about this purge list. hegseth was not on the list. generals who might be on it, wall street journal's reporting that trump is making a consecutive order to form a panel that was fast tracked efforts to remove certain generals and admirals. this is about purging maybe politically opposite viewpoints of people? >> let's just take a moment to step back and recognize how truly unprecedented even this idea is. it's about as un-american as you can get. this is what xi is doing right

now in china. he's finding those who don't agree with the ideology. not just the ideas, but the ideology of the chinese communist party and he is getting rid of them. he's purging them. that's the model. it is fundamentally un-american, against our values and against our constitution. if he follows through with this it will be very dangerous not just for national security, but for the military. >> we assume morale that will be unapologetically following the command of the commander-in-chief. this can't do well for the morale of the military in the armed services whom i look at this and say if i don't agree with them, you might pick away our leadership? >> this is going to cost a lot of junior officers for example, young 23-year-old lieutenants to be asking serious questions about when they had to disobey orders. that is a rare moment.

george w. bush, i didn't agree with the iraq war. it was not exactly the most loved secretary of defense. but i didn't think he was there just to politicize the military. i might not have agreed with his strategy, or the decision to go into iraq. but i didn't think he was trying to pursue some ideological agenda. that is what they are actually saying. so look, let's give them the benefit of the doubt for a moment here. and give them a chance to prove themselves. he has no experience, so let's see what he actually wants to do. but the warning signs are there. and i think those of us in congress, certainly democrats, but i think they're going to be some responsible veteran republicans, as well. we will keep a very careful eye on whether he is living to and upholding the values fundamental to our country of what this is all about.

>> it is an unbelievably important position. marco rubio, someone who senator john penniman -- fetterman. what do you think his selection says about trump's foreign policy initiatives? >> well, on the one hand, i think there are democrats who believe that they can work with rubio, that he is a reasonable person and that is obviously a good sign. on the other hand, this is a guy who ran against trump, he tried to do the name-calling stunt as a way to attack trump in the primary. he's kind of all over the map. does he oppose trump? does he like trump? what exactly are his values. i think that's the question we are asking. when you're the secretary of state especially, you are representing american values. you are our face of the world. when it comes to diplomacy, when it comes to negotiations. when it comes to saying what is

america all about? what is important to us? i think there are a lot of americans who don't understand what is important to marco rubio. that is what i will be wondering. >> they are thinking what they will be looking to him for guidance will be. there has been a lot of backlash since the election. you have made comments in particular to the new york times. i want to address them and read them in full. this is part of your comment. you said, i have two little girls. i don't want them getting run over on a playing field by a male or formally male athlete. and as a democrat, i'm supposed to be afraid to say that. i have to wonder, given some of the backlash that has come from it in the postmortem of what happened to democrats in this election, do you feel like cancel culture is swirling around it? >> yes. and it's okay. i will be fine. but unfortunately, the backlash proves my point. we can even have discussions about these issues. and we need to.

we need to impart because when democrats refused to even discuss these contentious issues, whether they be -- why are we not trusted on the economy? on immigration, core issues in this? if we can't listen to american voters and say by the way that we may not agree with you, but we value your opinion. we want to listen and understand your perspective. we are never going to connect with the majority of americans who are not going to have a chance of winning these debates, winning elections, and preventing a radical, hateful trump agenda from just selling through congress. so this is actually very important to some of the communities that are at risk here. and we as democrats need to stand up for and protect. >> you are back in congress this week. you have your work cut out for you. thanks for stopping by. >> thank you. up next, marine veteran

daniel penny on trial for the death of a homeless man in a new york city subway. and now the jury is hearing from a critical witness. a man who was not only there, but who helped him hold the victim down. could his testimony actually help or hurt the case against the defendant? inside the blockbuster trial next.

he was right there helping to hold jordan neely there. today, he testified under oath that he told daniel penny, quote, let him go. important testimony centered around a fatal chokehold. this key witness also admitting that he initially lied to investigators. let me take you back if you don't remember this case. this is where daniel penny, a 26-year-old marine vet fatally pinned down jordan neely, a homeless 30-year-old

man with a history of mental illness on a new york city subway. penny is now facing second degree manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide charges. he's played not guilty, claiming he acted out of the fence for the passengers on the subway car. the government in the argument there is that he was making passengers on the subway feel unsafe. and the prosecution alleges penny had good intentions, but went too far in trying to subdue neely. i have to warn you, what you are about to see is disturbing. >> i want to bring in gloria -- she is a correspondent who was in the courtroom today. also, elliot williams. an analyst and

former prosecutor. how is the prosecution feeling about their case this far? >> they had a good day in court today. the burden is on them to prove that daniel penny acted recklessly. he's been charged with manslaughter and criminally negligent homicide. what they are trying to prove is that daniel penny ignored the risk involved in the maneuver that he used against jordan neely, placing him in that joke . today's testimony by eric gonzales was important because he talked about how he saw him struggling on the subway floor and he jumped in to help. while he did this, he signaled and said to mr. penny, i'm going to hold his arms down so you can let him go. what we know from video evidence and from testimony is that mr. penny did not let go. in fact, he held jordan neely in that chokehold for nearly six minutes. now as you said,

the defense has said that he was doing this in an attempt to protect the other passengers on the subway. many of whom have testified about feeling afraid and fearing for their lives when they saw jordan neely get on the train and start yelling about being hungry, being thirsty, and about being afraid of going to jail. >> elliott, can you give me your assessment of how the case is going? how effective are the argument about good intentions and going too far? how does that play? >> it's important to remember this is a manslaughter case. it's not murder. what does the word recklessly mean? consciously disregarding a risk to that person in a way that is unreasonable. those are all vague terms. he had good intentions. there is no question there was a threat that was presented. one woman

said i was scared -- one person said he terrified everybody in the train car. fine. right? the question is, was it sufficient to neutralize that threat? i think for the purposes of manslaughter in new york, you probably get there because you have that video with the amount of time. i think one person said, hey man, you've got a really good chokehold. make sure he doesn't defecate on himself. those kind of things are being said in the moment. that's not going to play well in front of a jury. even in light of the good intentions that started the whole thing off. >> just hearing that. the atmosphere in the courtroom must have been very difficult. neely's father has been there most days. how has that been? with him there and of course, daniel penny a few feet away? >> he has been there since day one. one thing i had to say,

laura, the video. different angles of this video, different close-ups of this video has been played in court for these jurors and everyone in the courtroom over and over multiple times as they question witnesses. and have watched as his father often watches the video, he holds his hand -- head in his hands. and i watched him cry as the video plays. mr. penny is just a few feet away on the other side of the courtroom. every day he comes in, he says good morning. he does not appear to show any emotion. he also has a pretty big monitor directly in front of him, so he is seeing that video as well being played over and over. it is definitely a heavy environment and an emotional environment in the courtroom. showing this video of a man dying multiple times. we are seeing all of these reactions that they are having, as well as the family of mr. neely and those who have been in the courtroom to support

him. >> to many he was a stranger. but his own father watching this play-by-play. i can only imagine what he is feeling seeing his son. elliott, this case has echoes of the 1984 bernie -- case. it was a subway shooting. you and i talked about this. what are the parallels you see? >> okay, number one. rough city. people are scared. the threat of crime was present, however real it was. number one, white assailant, or accused assailant, and black victim. and responding to a threat. he was trained in the train car when these four men came up to him. daniel penny was frightened in the car. what is the threat and who is empowered to use force? and how are they allowed to get away with it? he was only convicted of a gun charge, but it was polarizing. even in 1984, you

have polarized media that sort of whipped up a frenzy about this case. do all of these issues that we are dealing with, safety and the city today. >> it was written by you, elliot williams. gloria, elliot, thank you so much for being here. both of you. well, it's going to be a moment to behold. president-elect donald trump returning to the oval office to meet president joe biden. if that's not awkward enough, there is already some drama brewing. imagine that? that's next.

tomorrow, a meeting will take washington back to the future. president biden welcomes donald trump back to the white house. the last time the president and president-elect sat down in the oval office after an election is back in 2016 when barack

obama and donald trump met just two days after trump won. it lasted 90 minutes. it is a tradition that dates back to 1841. it happens every time the presidency has changed hands until 2020. back then, biden did not receive an invite from trump because trump did not concede the election. i want to bring in chris, the author of "the fight of his life inside joe biden's white house". it was supposed to happen four years ago, but never did. how is biden going to approach tomorrow? >> it is an honored tradition for the outgoing president to welcome the incoming president. it is a tradition that trump did not honor. the operating board here is awkward. these guys hate each other. you know, donald trump uses a word for joe biden that i can't say on

the air. it starts with an r and has two syllables. joe biden calls trump that sick blank. we know they don't like each other. it's no surprise that joe biden would invite trump. that's who he is. he respects tradition, protocol, and does the right thing. the only surprise to me is that trump is showing up. he's acknowledging biden's legitimacy as president. i don't know what he thinks he could possibly have to gain from this except attention. could you imagine a really constructive conversation? i can't. >> i also see martinis with enemies sort of moment. you know who will not be there? the first lady melania trump. do

you think that is what's going on? i don't think so. it's no surprise to me that she won't be there. this is a toxic contentious relationship between these two couples. between these two families. it has been for a long time. and you know, obviously, it's to be applauded that the biden's invited them. it's not a surprise to me that she didn't accept. the surprise is that trump is going, i think. >> why do you think trump is going? is it equal parts gloating and attention? or something else? >> that could well be it. when it comes to donald trump, sometimes the simple answer is the right one. i don't think he's playing three dimensional chess that we are somehow not

detecting here. it may just be that he wants to go and gloat in biden's presence. >> i think democrats are finding in this postmortem. it's been a week now since harris lost. frankly republicans across the board when it comes to the house and senate. do you have an idea of what the biden team believes is the reason harris lost? >> there is plenty of finger-pointing going on right now between the biden camp in the harris camp. i think that the harris camp may well feel that it was mission impossible. biden put them into a hole that they just couldn't come back from. i think david mentioned that in his first post after

the election. biden's true believers within the campaign. there is an attitude that okay, well all you geniuses said that anybody except biden could be trump, and you got exactly what you asked for. look at the result. so i don't think that applies to joe biden and kamala harris. i have not heard anything to suggest that joe biden has been blaming her, are suggesting that she didn't run a good campaign. i think there is a respect between the two of them. >> what do you think his legacy seems to be? nancy pelosi thinks that he step down sooner, -- what is his legacy going to be now? >> i think there is a two part to that. the legacy is that he has been a consequential president. this is a guy who

rescued, pulled an economy out of a freefall. alleviated a once in a century pandemic, created 16 million jobs, stood up nato to face putin's invasion of ukraine. without a doubt, that is a very strong legacy. on the political side, it is a different story i think. the very first sentence or the second sentence of joe biden's political obituary will be that he stepped away from the ticket at the 11th hour, and that his successor lost to donald trump. there will be people who blame joe biden for -- and there have been as we know. they blame joe biden for not stepping away sooner and having an open primary process. i personally feel the jury is out on that. i think it's almost impossible to know whether an earlier primary would have given us a

different result. >> well, we will see. history books will be written. chris, thank you. >> the to be with you. >> up next, it's change lives and frankly entire industries. is ozempic the miracle drug everyone is making it out to be? dr. -- joins me next on his year-long investigation. plus, the bittersweet announcement from hollywood icon denzel washington. ♪ ♪

your business needs a network it can count on... even during the unexpected. power's out! -power's out! comcast business has you covered, with wifi backup to help keep you up and running. wifi's up. let's power on! let's power on! -let's power on! it's from the company with 99.9% network reliability. let's power on!

power on with the leader in connectivity. stay connected with comcast business internet and wifi back-up or get started for $49.99 a month. plus ask how to get up to a $500 prepaid card. call today! they are referred to as some as mere drugs people are using to lose weight. you may have thought you heard of all of them. ozempic, wegovy. what exactly do these treatments do in your body? and are they safe? his new documentary explores exactly those questions and more. here's a

clip. >> what it did help me with, those cravingsend quote away. >> experts call it food chatter. they were silent. that is part of the magic of some of these new medications. it seems to act in a way that no other hormone can. here's how it seems to work. every time you eat, all sorts of hormones are released like glp-1. they are called post-nutrient hormones. they travel here to the brain to tell you you are full or associated. they also travel here to the pancreas to kick out more insulin to help absorb the energy you just consumed. also here to your gut to slow down the emptying, allowing you to better digest your food. and

in so many ways, it seems like the perfect hormone to help you stop eating as much. it seemed perfect for rasheeda. in the first year, she lost 100 pounds. it changed her life. >> dr. sanjay gupta reports. is it right for you? it airs sunday at 8:00 p.m. eastern time. you say obesity is more of a brain disease. right? >> yeah. that's right. we sort of known this for some time. these medications i think in some ways have really put a fine point on this, laura. one of the things that sort of struck me, when you look at how these medications work, as you just saw there, it is doing a lot in terms of what is happening in the brain. what it has taught us, i think for some people, not all people. for some people who have obesity, they never stop talking about food. and they never feel full.

it is kind of incredible spending time with people who have this constant food chatter even as they are eating their mill. they are already thinking of their next one. if their cheery -- their pantry doesn't have enough food in it, they get anxiety. people used to think depression. just pull yourself up by your bootstraps. now i think it's pretty widely accepted that it's a brain disease. i think we are at those days with regard to obesity, as well. it is becoming increasingly accepted. in addition to all of the other impacts it has on the body. >> it was so interesting to see the way that you actually charted what it does to the body. what do we know about the long-term effects of the disease? >> i think whenever you have drugs that are relatively new, it's going to take time to collect some of that data. we know most of the side effects that people have do occur within the first few months. so people who get through those first two months, they might have gastrointestinal side

effects. sometimes, people just lose the joy for food as it was described. they have no interest in food. as a result, they become less social. things like that. those are side effects. in addition to losing fat, you lose muscle. you are losing lean muscle mass. for people who are older, that can be a problem. as much as we just heard about these drugs in the last two years, they've actually been around for a couple of decades now. they just didn't have a lot of fanfare about it back in 2003 when they were released. the point being that you have some 20 years worth of data, long-term data on a small group of people who have been taking these medications for quite some time now. i'm certainly going to tune in and watch this. everyone has been talking about these drugs. i would love to learn more and through the eyes of someone we respect. dr. sanjay gupta, thank you so much . be sure to catch dr. sanjay gupta reports "is ozempic right

for you?" it reports sunday night only on cnn. in case you missed it, or are about to miss it. breaking news, everyone. john krasinski is people magazine 2024 sexiest man alive. that's right, jim from the office is now the sexiest man alive. maybe it's for his turn on jack ryan? or maybe for his brain. he's the man behind the hit a quiet place. congratulations, john krasinski. or maybe i should say congrats to his wife. emily blunt. along the topic of sexiest man alive, 1996' winter denzel washington is saying he is getting ready to retire. wait, before you/your television, there is some good news. check out what washington said in an interview while promoting gladiator 2. >> i want to do things i

haven't done. i played a fellow at 22. i'm about to play a fellow at 70. after that, i am playing hannibal. after that, i've been talking with mcqueen about a film. after that, running apart for me in the next black panther. after that, i'm going to do king leader. after that, i'm going to retire. >> could i be cast as -- sorry. all right. we are going to get a lot more of denzil before he retires. and finally before we go tonight, in case you missed it, the viral wheel of fortune mistake i couldn't let you end your day without seeing. >> i would like to buy you! >> you are going to get three u's >> i would like to solve the puzzle. treat yourself around of sausage! >> i'm sorry, that's not it.