Skip to main content

tv   Anderson Cooper 360  CNN  January 24, 2025 9:00pm-10:00pm PST

9:00 pm
>> ben thinks he's playing a game, but he has no idea it's all a prank on him. >> boy. >> do i hope we're all friends after this. >> the joe schmo show all new tuesdays at nine on tbs. set your dvr now. >> closed captioning. >> is brought to you by uqora. help maintain a healthy urinary tract with uqora. >> i've been. >> having utis for ten years. >> at uqora, we. >> make uti. >> relief products. we also make. >> proactive urinary tract health products. >> and helping one about
9:01 pm
election law, the other about water and keeping them honest. also, the vote for pete hegseth to become defense secretary is coming up tonight, and there's new uncertainty among republicans. if he has the votes he needs. and later, what one of the january 6th ringleaders, enrique tarrio, told cnn's laura coates about retribution after he was freed by the president from a 22 year-old, 22 year sentence for seditious conspiracy. good evening. thanks for joining us. president trump is in the los angeles area tonight witnessing firsthand the fire damage, enormous destruction and dislocation from the worst wildfires in generations. he arrived a little less than two hours ago, took a tour of one of the fire zones, and is being briefed by officials. he and the first lady were greeted on arrival by the governor of california, gavin newsom, whom he promised to work with, in his words, to get it done. >> we want to get it fixed. we want to get the problem fixed, and there will be some ways, but it's like you got hit by a bomb, right? what do you think of it? i mean, nothing like this has happened. and we're going to get it fixed, so we'll get it permanently fixed so it can't
9:02 pm
happen again and again. >> now that's the sort of thing presidents say to governors after a natural disaster hits. what makes this time different is everything this president has said leading up to it, most recently earlier today when he laid out his conditions for federal disaster relief. >> i want the water to come down and come down to los angeles and also go out to all the farmland that's barren and dry. i want voter i.d. for the people of california, and they all want it right now. you have no, you don't have voter i.d. people want to have voter identification. you want to have proof of citizenship. ideally, you have one day voting. but i just want voter i.d. as a start. and i want the water to be released and they're going to get a lot of help from the u.s. >> now, a lot of help, he says. if those two conditions are met, changing election law, which has been a focus of trump's back to 2020 election but would seem to have little to do with disaster relief and water management choices, which he has repeatedly
9:03 pm
claimed were responsible for the scope of the disaster. >> we're going to then go to los angeles and take a look at a fire that could have been put out if they let the water. flow. >> he's also at times claimed that if this were done letting the water flow, in his words, the fires would not have happened at all. now, much of l.a .'s water comes from the sacramento-san joaquin river delta, which is pumped south through central valley farm country, through a mountain range, and into southern california. reservoirs. the president, as you've heard, has been saying over and over again that not enough water was being pumped and that california governor was refusing to allow it to be pumped because he wanted instead to protect a small fish which swims in the delta called the delta smelt. >> think of a sink, but multiply it times many thousands of times the size of it. it's massive and you turn it back toward los angeles. why aren't they doing it? they either have a death wish, they're stupid, or there's something else going on that we don't understand.
9:04 pm
>> that was trump on tuesday. here's what he posted nearly two weeks ago before on social media at the height of the fires when altadena and the palisades were on fire, governor newsom, excuse me, governor gavin newsom, he said, refused to sign the water restoration declaration put before him that would have allowed millions of gallons of water from excess rain and snow melt from the north to flow daily into many parts of california, including the areas that are currently burning in a virtually apocalyptic way. he went on to say he wanted to protect an essentially worthless fish called a smelt by giving it less water. it didn't work, but didn't care about the people of california. now, keeping them honest in order. governor newsom did not sign a water restoration declaration because there was no such document for him to sign. a trump transition official told cbs news that the president is actually referring to a 2019 proposed plan, which was actually started under the obama administration from the federal bureau of reclamation. now, second and most relevant, according to california officials, pumping more water would not have helped because
9:05 pm
l.a. area reservoirs were already full. the issue among several was getting enough water from reservoirs to city hydrants, through a system that was not built to fight these kind of fires. with these kind of wind speeds, which one u.s. forestry service official called a, quote, 99.99 ninth percentile event a reservoir serving pacific palisades that had been drained for repairs to its cover. as you probably know, for almost a year. not clear why repairs on the cover should have taken so long, given the weather conditions. the lack of rain and everybody knew this was an incredibly dry season that should certainly be looked into. governor newsom, on the day the city was on fire on wednesday, seemed to indicate on the eighth, seem to indicate he thought it was a local official problem, and that it was the local officials who needed to answer for the hydrants losing pressure. but days later, he then ordered an independent investigation over that empty reservoir, saying, quote, we need answers to how that happened. so there's that. there are also questions surrounding budget cuts to the l.a. fire department. we've been
9:06 pm
reporting on questions surrounding the lack of evacuation warnings to some people that some people say they experienced, but more water from the north doesn't seem to be top of the list, at least for california officials who have every reason to want the problem fixed. by the same token, it's hard to see what voter i.d. has to do with the disaster relief needs of southern californians, except for how it factors into the president's longtime focus on the 2020 election and perhaps how the president's long standing antipathy toward california's governor and the state plays in the mix. these are pictures of the 2018 fires there last fall, two former senior trump aides told politico that then-president trump refused to give california disaster aid until he was told how many people there voted for him. again, the president is in the pacific palisades at a firehouse there, will monitor what he's saying and bring you any news that he makes. more. now, on all of this from cnn chief white house correspondent and anchor of the source, kaitlan collins, also in los angeles, cnn's nick watt. so, caitlin, was the president's suggestion of conditioning disaster aid to california,
9:07 pm
adopting a voter i.d. law, as well as what he calls the release of water or letting the water flow. was that planned by the white house? was that a kind of off the cuff comment? >> it may not be like a planned policy announcement. anderson, in the terms of he came out and said it at a microphone in front of a lectern and had it prepared on paper. but certainly this is something trump has been talking about for days now. he's been going after local officials in california. he's been going after the governor for their policies, blaming them primarily for for what happened here and just how devastating and widespread these fires were. of course, we've seen local officials push back on that and say, yes, the management could have been better, but a lot of this was just unprecedented and something that they had never seen before. and what i thought was so fascinating during this was the white house did not know that governor newsom was going to come and greet president trump when he got off air force one and descended those stairs. newsom was not listed on a sheet that the white house sent out before. typically, they do this on a presidential trip. you'll know who's going to greet him. and instead, we saw trump and
9:08 pm
newsom handshaking. as you can see here. clearly, newsom delivering some kind of message to trump. and then just a few moments later, they came over and spoke to reporters. trump said nice things about governor newsom, someone that he has been referring to as new scum in recent days and someone who has been in return, criticizing his executive order that he signed regarding the 14th amendment. and then just now in this briefing, they were having. governor newsom, i should note, is not there. but trump said very positive things about them and said that they had a good conversation. so it is a remarkable side by side of what we hear from trump when he is in the white house on truth social, and what he says when he is side by side with governor newsom, who the white house did not know until they were flying to l.a. that he was going to be there waiting on the tarmac to greet him. >> it is. that is a fascinating detail, nick, what more can you tell us about president trump's tour of the devastated areas? >> you know, anderson, if you looked at this tour in isolation, you would think it was a very standard presidential
9:09 pm
tour of a disaster zone. but then, of course. secretary was again calling the governor new scum and saying that, you know, he'd done great harm to the people of his state. and, you know, governor newsom, aides have been telling us over the past few days that they feel like they've been fighting two wars, you know, one against the fire and one against the deluge of bs they say that's coming from the president and many other people. what is clear from president trump's demeanor is he is clearly moved by having actually seen what you and i saw here as the fires happened and the aftermath, you know, he mentioned some of the chimneys are even down. melania trump, the first lady, of course, is with him. they had a walk and talk with people in the palisades. one of those people was heard to say, you know, we feel let down by local leadership. and, you know, in this meeting now, you know, the president is sitting in front of a banner that says, you know,
9:10 pm
we're in this together. he's surrounded by bipartisan lawmakers. i saw him shake the hand of chief crowley, the l.a. fire chief, who's come under some criticism. and it seemed to me that the president said to her, good job. so it's all very convivial, all very supportive. he's talking about commiserating now and coming back to celebrate. but then, of course, the president went into his idea of, as you just laid out, that, you know, the water from up north should be coming down. and president trump said he's going to sign an executive order to make sure that happens. so right now, they're having a bipartisan meeting. brad sherman, who's a local congressman. one of the first things he asked was, you know, mr. president, you're you like a tariff. how about dropping tariffs on building materials? there was also talk about trying to shorten the permit period. so it all seems like all these levels of government are cooperating. but then we know what's been going on in the background, particularly between the president and the governor. so it's difficult to sort of square.
9:11 pm
>> nick, nick, let me ask you about this 2019 proposal, which is what the president keeps talking about, letting the water flow. my understanding is that was a proposal to kind of get water from the north to farmers in south of of california, not necessarily feeding los angeles county itself. is that right? >> correct. so the central valley, which is sort of breadbasket of california, that's where there was a lot of push to get the water to go. it all. tell me this smelt water from the north issue and the absolute problem that they had with the hydrants here in the palisades, that those two issues are entirely separate, that the issue here in the palisades was not that they didn't have enough water. you know, coming from the north, it was that the municipal water system here, like pretty much everywhere else on earth, was just not equipped to deal with an inferno like we saw here. and, you know, it's
9:12 pm
interesting, anderson, this house behind me, the lady who used to live in this house, stopped by and we chatted for a good half hour, and she said to me, stop making this political. stop making this about, you know, newsom versus trump. but unfortunately, over the past few days, it has been made political by the president and to a degree also by governor newsom. you know, this lady was saying there are people in need, you know, why can't we just get on with it? and that's the feeling, i think, of a lot of people in california stop making this political, for goodness sake. there are people in need. let's just work together, as we should, to make sure that people get all the help that they deserve. well. >> caitlin, it will also be interesting to see, given the sort of convivial nature of his side by side with governor newsom there, whether that actually and what he saw, whether that actually impacts, you know, his talk about conditioning this on, you know, this water from the north, which again, is supposed to largely go for farmers and voter i.d. law. >> but you know, what's fascinating, anderson, is that is what president trump said
9:13 pm
when he left the white house, that he was telling betsy klein at joint base andrews as he was about to get on the plane to go to north carolina and then go to l.a., that. yes, that he could see conditioning that aid on having voter i.d. and changing the water and whatnot. he's at this bipartisan briefing, and i was going to be watching this very closely, because there's a lot of democrats in the room who have been pretty critical of trump at times. brad sherman represents the 32nd district in california. he's a democrat, and he just president trump, to his credit, said anyone who wants to talk or give a statement can can please speak up. congressman brad sherman spoke up and was essentially making the case that he doesn't like what louisiana's abortion policy is. he doesn't agree with it. he thinks it's too restrictive. but he would never say to someone in louisiana who experienced a disaster that they could not get federal aid because of that. i think the phrase he was was, i'm not going to tell someone they have to sleep on their cousin's couch because i don't like their view on a woman's right to choose. and he was essentially making that argument to trump that just because you don't like a state's policies,
9:14 pm
that the people who live in that state should not be punished, and certainly not when it comes to something like this. it was a very fascinating back and forth between the two of them to watch that play out, as that was the argument trump made going there. and i will say nick watt mentioned an executive order that president trump plans to sign. i saw as we were waiting all the officials to for the officials to come into this room. the staff secretary at the white house, will schaff, previously a personal attorney to trump's, was in the room. that is the person who brings the documents and handles all of those executive orders. so it is notable that he is traveling with the president today. >> all right, caitlin, thank you. we'll see you at the top at nine on the source nick watt. thank you as always. joining us now is california democratic senator alex padilla. senator, what do you make of president trump's talk of conditioning disaster aid on california, adopting a voter i.d. law? and, as he says, letting the water flow? >> yeah, i mean, it's offensive. it's insulting. it's never been done before in the history of our country, as i think prior speakers have said. can you imagine if president biden told
9:15 pm
the people of florida, i'm not going to give you disaster relief unless you change your gun laws or louisiana with your abortion laws. it's unconscionable from the point of view as a southern california, because that's home for me. i know that we have been there for every other region in america in their time of crisis hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, whatever it is. and it happens to be our time of crisis. and we expect the federal government and our country to be there for us without conditions, without strings attached. so to suggest that is unconscionable. >> this this thing that he keeps saying about letting the water flow, getting more water from the north. originally my understanding again, when this was sort of being brought up back in 2019 that it was largely an issue to try to get farmers more water, which is a real concern. would it have would that water be also going to l.a. county, and would that be available for would that have made a difference? >> yeah. look, anderson, here's
9:16 pm
a truth that everybody needs to understand. the level of water flowing to southern california from the north today is the exact same as it was during the first trump administration. what he's talking about is exactly that not getting more water from the north to the south, but redirecting water in california is complicated. you have different users. agriculture, municipalities, environmental protection, et cetera. and even within that number of water districts. so you can take away from one water district to try to please another. no. what we have in place right now through federal and state partnerships is a great balance, and we need to keep that balance, not undermine it because of, you know, some political support that the president is trying to please or placate. >> if the president decided, i mean, he has slim majorities in both the house and the senate, if he wanted to condition the aid to california on voter i.d. or anything else, do you other democrats have much of any leverage to
9:17 pm
oppose it? >> look, here's why i'm hopeful. first of all, when we first went to president biden, who was quick to lend significant federal support, what a contrast here. the pitch and the thank you letter was. bipartisan. even california house republicans knew that this the disaster declaration and the immediate relief was necessary and should not be conditioned. i'm hopeful that despite the president's political rhetoric and attacks, that people like senator rick scott, former governor of florida, who knows what it is to deal with the disaster. senator thom tillis from north carolina, whose state recently has been ravaged by hurricanes. they've come out in support of this notion that we should not condition aid. so those republicans that know better need to stay strong. they need to stand up to trump. >> i talked to you on that wednesday the eighth on the streets in altadena street that was burning and had just burned down around us. um, is
9:18 pm
there i mean, does somebody local state authorities need to be held accountable? i mean, is there an investigation that needs to be done, should be done about, you know, hydrant concerns, talk about delayed evacuation orders. the reservoir that was empty for repairs because of a cover, the concern over bird droppings, criticisms around brush clearing. i mean, does this do answers need to be to be had? >> yeah. i mean, after every big disaster, there's always a look back. what what happened? what was the cause? the cause of these multiple fires are all underway. what went right? what went wrong? what could have gone better so that we're better prepared for the next time? so that's natural. of course, we should try to learn from this. but to again suggest that this water from the north. that's not what happened here. the analogy i've shared often is when you're in the shower, at least in a in a modest home and somebody flushes the toilet, you're going to feel it. maybe the temperature drops, but at least temporarily, there's a
9:19 pm
slight loss in pressure. the fire hydrant system in any major city in america is made to address a fire here, a fire there, not thousands and thousands of homes being burnt at the same time, with countless firefighters plugging into all these hydrants. of course, the pressure is going to be impacted. of course you're going to go through the water a little bit more quickly. that's what we're dealing with here, not whether water is flowing from one part of california to another. so the president needs to get his facts straight. >> senator padilla, i appreciate your time. thank you. >> thank you. anderson. >> coming up next, the vote that he and his senate colleagues are getting ready to take tonight on defense secretary nominee pete hegseth. we've got new reporting on fresh doubts among some republicans about hegseth chances. also tonight, our ed lavandera on a new wave of deportations specifically involving u.s. military aircraft. >> for generations, this ally to the north has been by your side. ontario, canada, a partner
9:20 pm
connected by shared history, shared values, and a shared vision for what we can achieve together a stable and secure when the world around us isn't. you can rely on ontario for energy to power your growing economy and for the critical minerals crucial to new technologies. ontario is your third largest trading partner, and the number one export destination for 17 states. our long standing economic partnership keeps millions of americans working in a changing world. it's time to bring jobs back home and build together more workers, more trade, more prosperity, more security. for generations, this ally to the north has been here and for generations more. we'll still be here, right by your side. >> covid 19. i'm not waiting. if it's covid. paxlovid. >> paxlovid is an oral treatment for adults with mild to moderate covid 19 and a high risk factor
9:21 pm
for becoming severe. it does not prevent covid 19. >> my symptoms were mild now, but i'm not risking it if it's covid. paxlovid. >> paxlovid must be taken within the first five days of symptoms and help stop the virus from multiplying in your body. >> taking paxlovid with certain medicines can lead to serious or life threatening side effects, or affect how it or other medicines work, including hormonal birth control. tell your doctor about all medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements you take as certain tests or dosage changes of your other medicines may be needed. tell them if you have kidney or liver problems. hiv one r or plan to be pregnant or breastfeed. don't take paxlovid if allergic to its ingredients. stop taking and call your doctor right away. if you have allergic reaction symptoms. serious side effects can include allergic reactions, some severe, like anaphylaxis and liver problems. these are not all the possible side effects, so talk to your doctor. >> if it's covid. paxlovid. >> ask your doctor today. >> it are you ready for this? are you ready for this? are you ready for this. >> new alka-seltzer plus cold or
9:22 pm
flu? >> fizzy chews? shou chew fizz. feel better fast. no water needed. new alka-seltzer plus fizzy juice. >> saving for retirement was tough enough. >> and navigating markets can be challenging at times. >> i understand that's why at fisher investments we keep a disciplined approach with your portfolio, helping you through the market's ups and downs. >> what about communication? >> we check in regularly to keep you informed. >> which means. >> you'll help us stay on track. >> yes, as a fiduciary, we always put your interests first because we do better when dave's been very excited about saving big with the comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. five years? -five years. and he's not alone. -high five. it's five years of reliable gig speed internet. five years of advanced securit. five years of a great rate that won't change. it's back. but only for a limited time. high five. five years? -nope. comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. powering five years of savings. powering possibilities. comcast business.
9:23 pm
of glp one through row connect with a provider today at roku 20. >> the thing about emergency medicine. >> we are. >> you never know what you're going to get you don't see that every day. >> a tier one trauma. now. >> even though you do everything right, you don't always get what you hope for. >> i need help here if you need me, i'll be saving lives.
9:24 pm
>> the pit. streaming exclusively on max. >> take a look at the capitol tonight. where? just minutes away. now, defense secretary nominee pete hegseth will get his senate votes. we'll start around just right before 9:00, i think. until recently, it seemed a foregone conclusion. now, perhaps somewhat less so. cnn's manu raju is at the capitol with the latest for us. so how does gop leadership think the vote is going to go tonight? >> there's high anxiety in the capital, anderson, no doubt about it. because already this was a close vote. 5149 was the vote yesterday to advance this nomination. but there are two republican senators who are uncertain how they would vote if they vote no. that would be enough to tank this nomination. those two republican senators, the former senate republican leader, colonel, kentucky senator mitch mcconnell, has not said how he would vote. and senator thom tillis, someone who has not said also how he'll ultimately come down and is someone who we're watching very, very closely. we do know that the senate majority leader, john thune, has spoken to him
9:25 pm
several times over the course of the day, anderson. and we also are expecting the possibility of republicans needing jd vance to come in and break a tie, which would only be the second time in history a vice president was needed to do so for a cabinet nominee. but if he does go down, anderson would be the first time since 1989 that the senate has rejected a cabinet nominee. that for john tower, for secretary of defense, who also faced similar allegations as hegseth has faced over womanizing and excessive drinking. of course, hegseth has denied those allegations. anderson. >> and manu, is there any sense of what, if anything, changed in the past 24 hours? i mean, when you spoke to senator tillis yesterday, he appeared to be on track to vote for for hegseth. >> yeah, he has not said. in fact, they have been radio silent about where he is on this critical nomination. when i asked him yesterday about his view, senator tillis indicated that he was reviewing all of these past allegations and was trying to see if anything could corroborate them.
9:26 pm
>> i have tried to and. >> continue to track down before his confirmation vote, any sort of lead with people that would speak to me, and they all had one thing in common up to this point, and none of them could provide me with firsthand corroborated testimony that i could, that i could point to. so now i have to go through, and now i'm going through this last allegation. but unless i can point to specific firsthand corroborated testimony, i'm not going to cave to pressure. i'm going to vote for his confirmation. if information comes out. that's material we should know over the next 24 hours. >> and he said we should know within the next 24 hours. so the question is, is there any new information that has come out? the only real key piece of information over the past day has been the revelation that pete hegseth paid $50,000 to an accuser of sexual assault, that during that 2017 incident that hegseth has denied assaulting that woman. but we have learned
9:27 pm
that dollar amount of this nondisclosure agreement that he signed with this accuser. it's unclear, anderson, if that is weighing in on this or what else tillis is considering, but he is also anderson up for reelection in 2026. and undoubtedly, if he votes against this nominee, he'll draw donald trump's ire ahead of a potential primary. >> all right, manu raju, thank you. we also have breaking news now from cnn's josh campbell. he reports that homeland security deportation efforts could target more than two dozen cities, according to a source familiar with the plans. that news comes just hours after federal law enforcement began using military aircraft for deportation flights. and while deportations are not new, the use of c-17 and c-130 transports is. cnn's ed lavandera has more. he joins us from el paso, texas. so what more are you learning about this military action at the border well, four of these military planes have been sent to two in san diego, two in el paso. >> we know one of those flights was took a group of about 75 to
9:28 pm
80 guatemalan citizens who had recently crossed the border here in the el paso area and were repatriated back to guatemala earlier today. but as you point out, there's important context here. over the last few days, the trump administration has been touting the numbers of people that have been deported since they took office this week. it's important to point out that so far, those numbers are not much different than what we've seen in recent months. and in the last year or so, immigrant advocates have been saying that so far, not much has changed. in those flights. we should also point out, for context that even though its new military flights or aircraft are being used to carry out these deportations, there have been deportation flights that have gone on for years all across the u.s. southern border. anderson. >> well, first of all, i'm curious about how much of this is to just have the visuals of military aircraft being used, which sends a message to people in countries in latin america and south america about the seriousness of
9:29 pm
this administration. what's the latest you're hearing about possible ice raids nationwide? >> yeah, i think you know a lot of that. and pardon the train that is blowing right past us here as we stand near the border wall, is and there's a lot of that happening right now with. >> i hope you're not on the tracks there. >> i'm not sure if you can hear me. >> it sounds like you are pretty close. >> apologies. anderson. begin hear me. >> all right. we'll check. on the timing. we'll check back in. >> and we'll check back in with you. i want to talk more about about that and the hegseth vote. joining us now is former minnesota republican governor tim pawlenty, who hopefully is not near a railroad track. no, he's not also democratic strategist alicia johnson and journalist and lift our voices co-founder gretchen carlson. gretchen, are you surprised by this sort of 11th hour uncertainty? hard to tell how real it may be. we heard thom tillis there saying he's looking for evidence but hasn't really found anything. >> yeah, we thought it was a done deal. after the procedural vote yesterday, with only two republicans saying no. but, you know, it started percolating earlier this morning that there
9:30 pm
was maybe some consternation amongst republican senators, others who are voting yes. and it's just sort of been building throughout the day. i mean, there's sort of this feeling now that it may not happen. and exactly what manu is saying is that thom tillis and mcconnell are the two that might actually end up voting no. you know, listening to thom tillis and how he was saying how he's looking at all the evidence and he wants to talk to first party people. you see, this is what i think all senators should have been doing from the beginning, like to just come out and say, i'm automatically supporting this person with all these allegations. that is not true. conviction. and actually, you have a senator like thom tillis who's taking the time to actually say, no, i'm going to look into all of this. that's what the people vote their elected officials to do. >> governor pawlenty, i mean, do you what do you make of this apparent uncertainty among gop? i mean, do you think it's really uncertainty? do you think mcconnell, tillis would join senators murkowski and collins?
9:31 pm
>> well, listening carefully to senator tillis words that we all just heard, he said if he doesn't find firsthand corroboration of these allegations, he's going to vote for hegseth. and that was statements made late today. and i doubt he's going to find that corroboration tonight. and if they go forward with the vote, my prediction to you is he's going to vote for hegseth. and by the way, i think this situation is partly a referendum on hegseth, but it's partly a referendum on donald trump. and the republican party has been taken over by trump. and he's calling the question and he, tillis is up for reelection next year in north carolina. and that is no easy path for him. if he's got donald trump trying to take him out. >> valencia how much political capital does president trump have on the line with this nomination? >> listen, it's interesting because i actually will agree with the governor and what he said and that a lot of this is about donald trump's politics and the party that has been taken over by donald trump. and so, as much as we would think that he has a lot of political capital on the line and that
9:32 pm
there's a risk with this nomination, we're not talking about any other president. we're talking about donald trump, who will, as the governor said, thom tillis is up for reelection. donald trump will make him a target. and we know how large and vast donald trump's base is. and so it actually makes this an unfortunate situation for the republicans, who actually do want to stand up to him and not set this precedent that you just rammed through any nomination of someone who has a background like hegseth. >> gretchen, the images from the border, i mean, nobody should be surprised, really, by them, given this is what president trump campaigned on. this is what many people wanted to see. and now they're seeing it, even though, you know, crossings are lower compared to what they had been at the height of the biden administration. but the images are the images. >> right? but, you know, the majority of americans, as we were leading up to the election, remember, the majority said they wanted mass deportations. and then one of the biggest
9:33 pm
messaging errors for democrats after the loss with kamala harris was on immigration. and you now have 12 battleground states where the senators there are now trying to reach out to the republicans to say, hey, can we have a bipartisan deal on immigration again? and now the republicans are saying, nope, we're not going to do it this time. so, look, i think that the majority of americans don't have a problem with what they're seeing happen at the border right now. trump said he was going to do it. and so far, he has the american, the majority of the american public behind him. >> governor, what do you think of military involvement in immigration and border security? what impact do you think it's going to have? obviously, we've seen national guard presence there a lot over the years. >> well, one of the main reasons that donald trump won this election is because the democrats, dramatically and belatedly underestimated the potency of the illegal immigration issue, and donald trump promised to deal with it aggressively and boldly. and he is. and he's declared an emergency, including security dimensions to that
9:34 pm
emergency, which empowers him to deploy the military. as you're seeing on these images. and i think, as gretchen just said, the bulk of all the people who voted for him and many more are actually going to be not only comfortable with, i think, applauding these efforts because they are very, very frustrated with runaway, out of control illegal immigration. >> valencia i mean, there was this new york times recent poll from the new york times. we'll put it up on the screen. a majority of americans approve of some of president trump's actions on immigration, with 63% supporting deporting undocumented migrants who entered the u.s. in the past four years, 55% supporting deportation of all immigrants living in the u.s. illegally. do you think support stays that strong? if people see deportations going into practice across the country? you know, in mass scale. >> listen, i think when the imagery continues to be this inhumane, you might see that shift. and i want to be very clear, i think the other two guests have said that democrats were not taking immigration seriously. but remember, there
9:35 pm
was a bipartisan piece of legislation up for people to vote on. and donald trump, while he was a candidate, tanked it. and so both sides of the aisle understand that this is a serious issue. but i also think the majority of americans, as well as democrats, want to make sure that the conversation around immigration and what we are doing about it is humane and using these military airplanes to do this and showing this imagery is a little scary. and i. >> don't think, but let's just be people. >> let's be frank. yes, there was a push for a bipartisan border deal and that that didn't happen. and there was a push later on there was a deal and it was killed by by then candidate trump. but biden acted on the border just weeks before the first presidential debate by executive order. and it had actually a very, you know, strong impact. that was something he could have done early on that they didn't do anything about. and it was done
9:36 pm
just before the debate. >> well, i hear you on the timing. i think that was clearly a time when when president biden realized, i'm not going to get this through congress and let me figure out other ways to ensure that i'm addressing the issue of immigration. and so i don't think it's fair to actually say that democrats have been ignoring it or using it for political gain or anything like that. but the hard part is doing this on their own. and it's been a very partisan way to find a solution, and that's not going to work. i think, for the american people. >> we'll see. governor pawlenty, thank you, alysia johnson, gretchen carlson as well. coming up, what? convicted january 6th, ringleader enrique tarrio told cnn's laura coates about wanting retribution after president trump freed him from a 22 year sentence for seditious conspiracy. she joins us next. also, why a judge barred another ringleader, stewart rhodes, from washington. >> he said, you know, hey, trump. >> with cascade platinum plus, i have upped my game.
9:37 pm
>> in that dishwasher. >> watch me. platinum plus gives you the highest standard of clean, even in your machine. >> clean enough for you? >> yeah. >> scrape. bloat. done. cascade. platinum plus. >> at harbor freight, we design and test our own tools and sell them directly to you. no middlemen, just quality tools you can trust at prices you'll love. whatever you do, do it for less. at harbor freight. >> look out, cause here i come. have you always had trouble with your weight? same. >> discover the power of wegovy. >> with wegovy. i lost 35 pounds and some lost over 46 pounds. >> and i'm keeping the weight off. >> i'm reducing my risk. >> wegovy is the only weight management medicine proven to reduce risk of major cardiovascular events such as death, heart attack or stroke in adults with known heart disease and obesity. >> don't use. >> wegovy with semaglutide. >> or glp one medicines or in children under 12. don't take if you or your family had mtc
9:38 pm
men2 or if allergic to it. tell your provider if you plan to have surgery or a procedure, are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to be. stop taking and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or any of these allergic reactions. serious side effects may include pancreas inflammation and gallbladder problems. call your prescriber if you have any of these symptoms. wegovy may cause low blood sugar in people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to treat diabetes. call your prescriber about vision changes. if you feel your heart racing while at rest, or if you have mental changes, depression or thoughts of suicide may occur. common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, flu or upset headache, feeling tired, dizzy, or bloated gas and heartburn. some side effects lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. >> with wegovy. >> i'm losing weight. >> i'm keeping it. >> off and i'm lowering my cv risk. wegovy. >> ask your prescriber about wegovy. >> rinse it out. >> every now and then i get a
9:39 pm
little bit tired of the things that just will never come out. >> in the in stargate. >> every now and then i rinse it. out. >> soda in. >> just one wash. >> the average dog only lives to be ten at the farmer's dog. we don't think that's long enough. that's why our food comes in personalized portions. because a dog at a healthy weight can live a longer, happier life. >> greatness hurts, but sometimes you gotta put on your game face. that's why tylenol d
9:40 pm
call one ( 800) 217-1487 now or visit us at fund.com. >> closed captioning is brought to you by uqora. help maintain a healthy urinary tract with uqora. >> i've been having utis for ten years. at uqora, we make uti relief products. we also make proactive urinary tract health products. uqora is a lifesaver. try it today at uqora. com. >> in a new interview with cnn's laura coates, january 6th ringleader enrique tarrio talked
9:41 pm
about his demand for, quote, retribution. tarrio, leader of the far right so-called proud boys, was serving 22 years for seditious conspiracy when the president pardoned him shortly after taking office. laura coates joins me now. so talk more about your conversation with tarrio. what do you say? >> it's really interesting. when i was wondering about his viewpoints on whether he was remorseful, whether he viewed the pardons given by trump as something that were warranted or otherwise, and how he saw himself in the general swath of people who were indeed given that form of clemency. listen to what he had to say about how he specifically is defining retribution, anderson so let's talk about what i what retribution is, because i did in most interviews, i did clear up what i meant by retribution. >> i meant investigations. so they need to be investigated. and if if they did everything correct and they did everything by the book, there shouldn't be anything for them to worry about. who's the they
9:42 pm
there shouldn't be. and here i want to be unequivocally clear that by no means am i asking for violent retribution to anybody. i don't i don't condone any violence towards any elected official. actually, i don't condone violence to any human being. but i do think that that it needs to be the process needs to be investigated. >> and so who would you be investigating? the the prosecutors, the attorney general? what does that look like? >> i mean, i'm not in the legal field, but i think we should start from the top to the bottom. i think we should start with merrick garland, move our way down to matthew graves and specifically in, in in most of these j6 cases, some of the lead prosecutors in this case. >> of course, this is exactly why many were wondering about the type of preemptive pardons that might be handed down by biden. and, of course, his statement clarifying whether he intended violence to escape retribution was top of mind given, of course, the events of january 6th and what he had been
9:43 pm
accused and convicted of having done. >> and what exactly is he accusing? merrick garland and others of doing? like he prosecutors actually just like doing their jobs and prosecuting crimes? >> we made that exact point with him, anderson. and he believes a huge miscarriage of justice took place precisely because of the fact that they did not change the venue outside of washington, d.c. he pointed to the voting practices and behavior of who he believed was on the jury, as an indication that he would not have gotten a fair trial. but he also tried to make a distinction between why he felt trump actually issued the pardons. it wasn't for innocence. it was because of that so-called miscarriage of justice and that people were entitled to have their trials elsewhere. of course, there wasn't much daylight in between. the pardons, given almost in a blanket style for those who committed violent acts and otherwise. but he saw that as the primary cause as to why people should look upon these pardons differently. >> all right, laura, thanks very much. you can see the whole interview tonight. laura coates live at 11 p.m. eastern. up
9:44 pm
next, a federal judge rules the founder of the so-called oath keepers is now barred from entering the u.s. capitol or even d.c. and what we could learn more from newly declassified files on the assassination of jfk. harry enten joins us for that. >> it. are you ready for this? are you ready for this. >> new alka-seltzer plus cold or flu fizzy chews? shou chew fizz. feel better fast. no water needed. new alka-seltzer plus fizzy juice. >> patients who have sensitive. >> teeth but also. >> want whiter teeth. they have to make a choice one versus the other. sensodyne clinical white provides two shades whiter teeth, as well as providing 24 over seven sensitivity protection. patients are going to love to see sensodyne on the shelf. >> in our family, there was a passion for glass making that's passed down through the generations. >> we stood. >> on some pretty. >> broad shoulders to get to where we're at today. >> on ancestry, i was able to
9:45 pm
actually put together our family tree. each person is a glass worker. >> that's why we do what we do. we can't help it. the glass blowing, that's a part of our dna. >> it's in my blood. it's in my history. it's my job to make sure that this shop makes it to the next generation. >> we move. we move. >> and, doug. >> you'll be back. emus can't help people customize and save hundreds on car insurance with liberty mutual, you're just a flightless bird. no. he's a dreamer, frank. >> james ho came up and doug. >> well, i'll be. that bird really did it. >> only pay for what you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. >> did i read this? did i get eggs? where are my keys? >> don't wait. while memory and thinking issues pile up. these issues may seem like normal aging, but could be due to a
9:46 pm
buildup of amyloid plaques in the brain. amyloid can build up over time. the sooner you talk to your doctor, the more options you may have. visit amyloid.com for additional information. >> i had the worst dream. >> last night. you were in a car crash, and the kids and i were on our own. >> that's awful. >> hon. my brother was saying he got life insurance from ethos, and he got $2 million in coverage, all online. >> life insurance made. >> easy. check your price today at ethos comm can a personal loan unlock. >> your ambitions? >> oh, yeah. consolidate bad debt and save money for your next goal. sofi. personal loans low fixed rates. borrow up to 100 k. no fees required for the times when. >> cooking just isn't in the cards. try brand new ready made meals from hellofresh. >> no prepping. >> no cooking. just heat up and dig in to delicious
9:47 pm
new from hellofresh. >> nice car. >> still for sale? >> how about i pay you half now, half later. >> there you go, jake. >> thank you. >> did you just. >> sell your. >> car to carvana? >> yes i did. >> well, that. >> puts this location into context. >> i tried to tell. >> you. >> sell your car to carvana. >> today with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. my skin was no longer mine. >> my active. >> psoriatic arthritis. >> joint symptoms held me back. >> don't let. >> symptoms define you emerge as you with clearer skin with tremfya. most people saw 100% clear skin that stayed clear even at five years. tremfya is proven to significantly reduce joint pain, stiffness and swelling. >> serious allergic reactions and increased risk of infections may occur. before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tb. tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms or if you need a vaccine. >> emerge as you with clear skin. ask your doctor about tremfya.
9:48 pm
>> i'm howie mandel. the newest ambassador of skechers. >> funny story. >> how i became an ambassador. i went to the store and i lied and said i was an ambassador. do i get a discount? the owner called me and said, would you like to be an ambassador for skechers? and i said, yes, try skechers slip ins. >> the same day as the so-called proud boys leader is on a publicity tour, we learned that his fellow seditious conspiracy convict, stewart rhodes is now barred from the nation's capitol unless he has court authorization. rhodes appeared at the capitol complex earlier this week, not long after president trump commuted his 18 year sentence. the decision by a federal judge also applied to seven others from rhodes so-called oath keeper group, joined now by former federal judge shira scheindlin. so are you surprised by by this order from the judge? >> i was a little surprised, but i understood it. i think that the judges in d.c. are frustrated. they're angry. they put a lot of time and effort into this. and then it was all wiped out. so i think they thought, or at least judge mehta thought about it and said, do i have any jurisdiction left? and
9:49 pm
it seems to me it's an open question. i try to look at that. >> and what is the i mean, you can bar somebody from visiting someplace. >> oh, yes. as a condition of supervised release. you can do a lot of things. and that's one of the things you can do. but the question is, does the court still have jurisdiction to change the conditions of supervised release? is there still supervised release? so when a judge issues a sentence, let's say me so you give 18 years and then you say to be followed by three years of supervised release, and you set conditions for that release. so the question is when the sentence was commuted, does it just end the jail term, or does it also mean the supervised release is over? >> because the interim u.s. attorney for d.c. also released a statement saying, if a judge decided that jim biden, general mark milley or another individual were forbidden to visit america's capital even after receiving a last minute preemptive pardon for the former president, i believe most americans would object. the individuals referenced in our motion have had their sentences commuted. period. end of sentence.
9:50 pm
>> well, first of all, there was no sentence on jim biden and there is no sentence on mark general milley. yeah. so it's very, very different. they're not sentenced people here. there was a sentence in place and it was commuted. usually that would mean the sentence was commuted from prison to time served. so the issue that remains is does the court have any jurisdiction left? and as i understand it, there's a split in the circuit courts on that very issue on the appellate courts. >> and if rhodes was to violate the judge's order, what would happen? >> well, the judge could issue an order why he should not be held in civil contempt. the judge can't do criminal contempt because that would take a prosecutor. and the d.c. prosecutor is never going to do it. if it's a trump appointee. doubtful. so he could at most, he could do civil contempt, and then there'd be a little trial and he could decide whether the guy is in civil contempt. and the punishment for civil contempt can include jail and fines. so i don't know if it would come to that. but the real question first is, is the acting u.s. attorney, right, that the
9:51 pm
court has no further jurisdiction? and as i said, there seems to be a circuit split. >> what do you make of of the pardons? >> oh, well, the pardons were too broad. he first said he would try to separate violent and not violent, but he did. everybody, people who attacked police officers. i was surprised by that because he wants the support of law enforcement and claims to be a supporter of law enforcement. >> pardons are also usually for people who have demonstrated, once incarcerated, a willingness to, you know, they have regret, willingness to serve others to to. there's clearly none of that. >> none of that. >> in that. >> no, but not all pardons require the person to say, i'm sorry for what i did, but you're right. typically that would be part of it. but here it was just everybody, despite what they did, despite who they hurt, despite their actions, despite their violence. so i was i was quite surprised at the overbreadth of it. >> the jefferson thank you so much. appreciate it. up next, what we might find out now that
9:52 pm
the president has okayed the release of the remaining classified government documents about the assassination of president john f kennedy. we'll be right back. >> ontario, canada, stable and secure when the world around us isn't. you can rely on us for energy to power your growing economy. and for critical minerals crucial to new technologies. we're here right by your side. >> tap into etsy for original and affordable home and style pieces like lighting under $150 to brighten your vibe for under $100, put your best look forward with vintage jackets or pick up custom shelving for under 50 to make space without emptying your pockets and get cozy with linen robes for 75 or less. for affordable home and style finds to help you welcome whatever's next, etsy has it. >> let's lay one down, bob. >> a complete unknown is now nominated for eight academy
9:53 pm
awards, including best actor, best supporting actor, best supporting actress, best director and best picture of the year. >> how does it feel? >> a complete unknown. >> for covid 19? i'm not waiting. if it's covid, paxlovid. >> paxlovid is an oral treatment for adults with mild to moderate covid 19 and a high risk factor for becoming severe. it does not prevent covid 19. >> my symptoms are mild now, but i'm not risking it if it's covid. paxlovid. >> paxlovid must be taken within the first five days of symptoms and helps stop the virus from multiplying in your body. >> taking paxlovid with certain medicines can lead to serious or life threatening side effects, or affect how it or other medicines work, including hormonal birth control. tell your doctor about all medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements you take as certain tests or dosage changes of your other medicines may be needed. tell them if you have kidney or liver problems hiv one are or plan to be pregnant or breastfeed. don't take paxlovid if allergic to its ingredients. stop taking and call your doctor right away. if you have allergic reaction symptoms. serious side effects can include allergic reactions, some severe, like anaphylaxis
9:54 pm
and liver problems. these are not all the possible side effects, so talk to your doctor. >> if it's covid. >> paxlovid. >> ask your doctor today. >> ever feel like a spectator in your own life with chronic migraine? 15 or more headache days a month, each lasting four hours or more? botox prevents headaches in adults with chronic migraine. in a survey, 91% of users wish they'd started sooner, so why wait? talk to your doctor. >> botox effects may spread. >> hours to. >> weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. >> alert your doctor. >> right away as trouble swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life threatening condition. those with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. side effects may include allergic reactions like rash, breathing problems, dizziness, neck and injection site pain and headache. don't receive botox if there's a skin infection. tell your doctor your medical history. muscle or nerve conditions like als, myasthenia gravis or lambert-eaton syndrome, and medicines like botulinum toxins, which may increase the risk of serious
9:55 pm
side effects. >> chronic migraine may still >> chronic migraine may still keep you from being there. ask (humming) behold! a glorious round table pepperoni pizz... huh? ah. huh. well, behold the pepperoni and grilled chicken...? what the? (clears throat) behold, the pepperoni, grilled chicken and bacon pizza from round table! three magnificent toppings grilled chicken, pepperoni, and sizzling bacon. try it at round table pizza!
9:56 pm
her money. you're worthy of more. get started at worthy comm. >> super man. the christopher reeve story. february 2nd on cnn. >> looking there at the senate floor, the confirmation vote for defense secretary nominee pete hegseth is expected to start at the top of the hour. hegseth is there in a room nearby, along with his family. vice president vance is reportedly on hand in case he's needed to break a tie. two republican senators have said they will vote no. unclear about two others. now, president trump's fulfillment of a campaign promise, signing an executive order, one of many for the declassification of all files relating to the assassinations of president john f kennedy, senator robert f. kennedy and the reverend doctor martin luther king jr.. and afterwards he had an aide give the pen he used to rfk jr., rfk kennedy jr., son of the late rfk and nephew of the murdered president, who's the president's pick to run health and human services. take a look
9:57 pm
that's a big one, huh? >> a lot of people are waiting for this for a long for years, for decades. and everything will be revealed. >> okay. >> give that. to rfk jr.. >> yes, sir okay well, we want to focus now on the jfk files. >> the national intelligence director and attorney general must have a plan within 15 days to release the files on his assassination, but it's unclear when they'll be made public. the tragic event in dallas in 1963 shocked the nation. obviously, it fueled a lot of conspiracy theories, including whether president kennedy was killed by a single gunman acting alone in the texas school book depository. joining us with more senior cnn senior data reporter harry enten. so, i mean, i there was a whole bunch of documents released already. how many documents are yet to
9:58 pm
be unsealed? only about 3000, give or take. you ask different research experts, but you're right. there have already been millions, millions upon millions of documents that have already been released by the government with concern to the jfk assassination. and i really do have to ask, like, what are folks really expecting from these files? yes, we believe a lot of them are from the cia. and we'll see exactly what they hold. but i really feel like this is like geraldo rivera going to al capone's basement. i was going to make an al capone's vault. >> right. i beat you to it. i beat you to it. >> two new yorkers, i beat you to it. >> and, you. >> know, of course, nothing was actually found there. i just feel like folks are letting themselves get blown, you know, sort of make their minds go sort of crazy, and they're just going to be let down at the end of the day. what do most americans think? i mean, are there polls on on the jfk assassination? you know, there are there are. >> there are polls on everything. we've been through this. over and over and. >> over again. and what's so fascinating.
9:59 pm
>> to me. >> is that most americans actually believe, you know, that it wasn't just lee harvey oswald acting alone. and we've seen this over and. over and over again in the polls. you see it right there, 65% say two or more people in a 2023 poll. that's actually up from 2013. and more than that, that number. i've looked at it throughout the entire history in every single poll taken by gallup, a plurality of americans have always said it was two or more people. and so i think this type of release by donald trump is trying to get at those folks. there are a lot of folks who have been waiting and waiting and waiting and waiting for it. but ultimately, at the end of the day, i do think that a lot of these. >> folks are. >> going to be let down. i mean, on the martin luther king jr. documents, i mean, what's interesting about that is there was weaponization of the fbi against doctor king. i mean, and j. edgar hoover obviously was legendary in, you know, using the fbi for his own, his own ends. so that would be interesting to see sort of more documents on that. but if not oswald on the kennedy assassination, who do people
10:00 pm
believe was behind this? >> yeah, this is where it. >> sort of gets nutter butter to me. you know, if you look at who the conspiracy theorists believe that might have been involved, get this, a rising percentage of them say that they believe the united states government was involved. maybe it was the cia, maybe it was lyndon baines johnson. that number has climbed to nearly 40% of the conspiracy theorists, believing that the united states government may, in fact, been involved in that assassination. i find the entire thing to be sort of nutter butter, because i just think that the, you know, we've had 60 plus years of this going down and nobody has proved anything beyond what the warren commission actually found. all right. harry enten, i know you'll be poring through whatever documents are. >> oh, you know me. i'll be going. >> through it like nobody's business. the hegseth confirmation vote now underway. two republicans, lisa murkowski, susan collins, expected to vote no. we don't yet know about senators mitch mcconnell and thom tillis. thom tillis did speak to manu raju earlier today and indicated if he found something new that might have impact his vote, but it sounded like he