>> is that troops? >> i mean. >> it's a big. >> issue. >> i mean, it would surprise us all. >> i'll say that. >> so i. >> think. >> i don't. >> know. >> one gop lawmaker with a very clear opinion on the matter, rand paul, who posted this, quote, the pursuit of peace should be that of the israelis and the palestinians. i thought we voted for america first. we have no business contemplating yet another occupation to doom our treasure and spill our soldier's blood. it will be a very interesting day tomorrow, when trump and israel's benjamin netanyahu go over to capitol hill for a visit. thank you very much for watching news night. laura coates. liv starts right now. >> well. >> tonight the clock is ticking. >> for workers across. >> the federal

own political beliefs ahead of the trump administration and the trump team. walking back, the president's plan to take over gaza. and it begs the question who knew about it beforehand? this plan. tonight on laura coates live. all right. just about, what, 24 hours you got roughly 2 million federal workers having to face a very dramatic choice. either you accept donald trump and elon musk's so-called fork in the road, or you venture down the path unknown. they face a midnight deadline tomorrow to resign and accept a so-called buyout. i'll tell you why i say so-called in a moment. and if they don't? well, then they run the risk of getting caught up in

widespread layoffs. we know at least 40,000 workers have taken up the offer so far, but unions and state attorneys general, they're warning not to take the bait. they argue this likely isn't even legal. in just a moment, i'll talk with someone who has seen this movie crash and burn before. when she represented former twitter employees who were there when musk took over, making it x. this time, he's using the same playbook to reach deep into the federal government. already, doge has its paws in. usaid essentially dismantled the treasury department noaa, the centers for medicare and medicaid services. doge now has access to the agency's systems. and tonight, musk is claiming, quote, big money fraud is happening there. the labor department, even the transportation department. transportation secretary sean duffy says the doge team is

going to plug in to help upgrade the aviation system. and those are just the agencies we know about. musk's wrecking ball is swinging so quickly and so forcefully that democrats are frankly, struggling to respond. they've held rallies against him. they've attacked him on his own platform. and today they tried to slap a subpoena on him to force him to testify before congress. now, republicans. may budge. >> it feels as if y'all have just decided that y'all are going to castrate your constitutional duty and hand it over to someone who is unelected. >> donald trump and an unelected billionaire, elon musk, are illegally dismantling our government agency by agency and illegally stealing your data, your money, and your services. >> musk and his doge i like to call it dodgy because they seem to dodge any kind of authority and accountability. they are

intent on destroying our federal government and the essential services it provides. >> as for the response from the white house, trump's press secretary says democrats have no ground to stand on because americans knew exactly what they were getting. >> they don't even know what they're talking about because president trump was elected with a mandate from the american people to make this government more efficient. he campaigned across this country with elon musk, vowing that elon was going to head up the department of government efficiency, and the two of them with a great team around them, were going to look at the receipts of this federal government and ensure it's accountable to american taxpayers. >> well, my next guest is an employment lawyer representing 2000 former twitter employees suing the company over severance, as well as handling over a dozen class action lawsuits related to the company's treatment of workers. after elon musk acquired the social media platform. and now she's hearing from federal

workers facing so-called buyouts. shannon liss-riordan joins me now. shannon, tell me what you're hearing from federal employees tonight. >> i've been getting lots of questions from federal employees over the last week. they're in this very difficult situation of trying to decide what to do with their careers, how to respond to this so-called fork in the road email that they got last week. >> the so-called fork in the road on that point. i mean, federal unions have actually been warning employees that there are no guarantees here, calling it a bad deal. they're calling it a scam. is the offer legit, and is there any recourse if they don't end up getting paid? >> those are some very good questions. and i was asking i was being asked very similar questions by twitter employees back in november of 2022 when they got this mysterious email with the subject line fork in the road. and the answer is, is

that we don't really know. i understand that there is a lot of concern about whether the president and whether elon musk even have the authority to make this promise to the employees, and we don't really know. congress hasn't authorized funding through september. we've heard that there may be challenges to the government paying out employees for months when they're not doing work. so there are a lot of unknowns. but on the other hand, there are also unknowns on the other side, because the president and elon himself have issued not so veiled threats against so many workers at government agencies that layoffs are coming, that terminations are coming, that terminations for cause are coming. so it's a very difficult situation that employees are in, and they've got to make a really tough choice now by tomorrow. >> are there any lessons learned from what the twitter employees endured? >> i think there are a lot of lessons to be learned. we are

pursuing more than 2000 cases on behalf of twitter employees right now, and i do believe that there is still a law there. we have a legal system in this country, and there's recourse when representations are made to people and it's not carried through. it is trickier to sue the federal government than to sue a private company. that said, it is hard for me to believe that if the u.s. government, purportedly through opm, makes this promise to employees that they'll be paid through september, and then if that gets reneged on, i think there should be recourse for these employees. but but there are no guarantees. the twitter employees similarly had to make this decision. some of the employees decided to stay with the company, only to get terminated just weeks later. the night before thanksgiving, a bunch of employees who had said that they were committing to elon's vision of being hardcore, then got terminated a

couple of weeks later with no severance offered at all. so there are just no good answers here. >> obviously, people remember that and must be using it to guide their own decisions here. a former senior employee at twitter telling cnn what's happening now fits with how musk operates, saying that musk once told him directly if you're not adding things back in afterwards, then you weren't cutting hard enough to start with. that's one thing for a private entity. is it the right approach for a government to cut into the bone? >> yeah, yeah. no, absolutely it is. it's very scary. it's terrifying what's happening because not only are these employees being put in this very difficult, very difficult situation, i am worried about our federal government, which may be on the brink of losing so much experience and expertise. and it was one thing for elon musk to decide to buy twitter for $44 billion and then destroy it. it's another thing for him to take a wrecking ball to the

federal government, the u.s. government, upon which billions of people across the globe rely on. i really worry about what's going to happen for us, the employees who are calling and asking for advice. i'm telling people they have to make their own personal decisions here. but as a country, i really worry what we may be about to lose. i mean, there are plenty of employees who may think, hey, i want to get out of here. eight months severance sounds pretty good to me. but you know, the information that they're getting every day is changing. originally, they were told, if you decide to resign now, you'll get eight months of severance. and it was a little ambiguous. they said you may be asked to continue working. and so then the question was, well, what is it? they were even being offered? resign and you keep working. and then they clarified that another day or two later and they said, no, no, if you

resign, you won't have to do any work after march 1st. so and you can go get another job. but then a lot of employees are scratching their heads saying, well, how can i go get another job? federal employees have long been told we're not allowed to get other employment while being on the federal payroll. we're talking to lawyers who work for the government who are saying, aren't there ethical concerns about us working somewhere else? and one employee said that she was told, no, she won't have to work anymore. and then after she resigned, she was told, no, you need to keep working through may. so people are getting such conflicting information. >> in other words, clear as mud. but that might very well be the point. shannon liss-riordan, thank you so much. >> thank you for having me. >> let's continue our conversation with cnn political commentator shermichael singleton and former senior adviser to bernie sanders, 2016 and 2020 presidential campaigns, chuck rocha. i mean, let me first begin with this. the idea of the uncertainty here. why would anyone take him up on that

offer? >> i mean, look, i would think if your onus of your mission is to restructure government in such a way that it's leaner, you usually want to reduce overhead pretty immediately. so if you're elon musk, you're coming from the business sector. that's usually the first thing a business would do. you start reducing overhead. it's a good sign to your investors. it's usually an idea that you're trying to control costs. overall, he's attempting attempting to take that mindset to the government. obviously, it's far more complicated, but i think the premise of the aims aren't necessarily bad. however, i do think you got to streamline this process, laura, if people are expecting to take this eight month severance package, then that needs to be pretty clear. you can't say, well, take it, but then you can also work for 2 or 3 months. they got to figure that out. but but i think the premise is pretty is pretty good. >> but you know, the streamlining is one thing. they're going at lightning speed right now with a lot of the changes they're making. i know they say the mandate is one thing, but cnn's reporting that doge now has access to medicare, to medicaid payment systems. this is lightning speed. do either of you have concerns about the pacing of it? because

it could actually end up backfiring on republicans and democrats. >> if somebody stops getting a check on time that's relying on that, or if somebody's health saving care gets disrupted in some way, even a little bit, it's going to be a political football. none of them can handle going back to everybody getting fired. the big difference between twitter and these federal employees is they have a collective bargaining agreement. in the last 48 hours, over 6000 workers at the federal government have joined the afge local. that's 11,000 the total of last year, because they're scared and they're worried and they're not sure. collective bargaining is just one insurance that they would have of repercussions. you're a lawyer. you know how that works. that gives you a grievance process that you have to go through, which is part of an organization when you're a part of that. and so that's something that's different than the twitter thing. and the last piece of that is it's and i hate to get into the weeds on this, but it's governed by the nlrb, the national labor relations board. and this week, donald trump got rid of the fifth member of that fired them. he has the right to do that. but now they can't make quorum and file or take what do you call disciplinary actions on

that board because they can't have a quorum. so i think all of this is connected. >> so it sounds like really flooding the zone in terms of all the things that are happening. as a republican, do you have issues with the fact that the pace might be more than even republicans can look at? >> i'm not necessarily opposed to moving quick if it's orderly, so move quick. but in an ordered process. again, if the promise to the american people is that we've got to save more money. we're looking at inefficiencies, duplications within federal agencies. we're going to figure out how we can reduce size of inter-governmental departments and maybe merge them into others. that's going to save hundreds of millions, billions here. then collectively, you look at a couple of hundred billion saved over time. that makes sense from a structured perspective. i think mr. musk and the folks at doge have to figure out a way to get there, to articulate that to the american people. >> right now, what's being articulated, if you look at these live photos that are happening right now of the senate democrats, they are staging an all night marathon. this is senator adam schiff, obviously from california. there's an all night marathon

of speeches in protest of russell nomination to lead the office of management and budget. chuck, why him and not the others? >> i think it's like you said, everything is coming so quick. this was the most important one coming up right now. so they could do something right now. democrats have been under a lot of fire. like you're not doing anything. you're not standing up, you're cowering in the corner. >> is that fair criticism? >> it is because everybody was flat footed because they're like, what is this crazy man doing? and how is he doing it so fast? so now they're standing up and going, okay, we got to do something. we got to do something. now who's the next big name up? let's stand together and show that we're not going to take this. i think that's what you're seeing. >> but, laura, the democrats are in their right to to critique and criticize musk and trump. but why not offer what their contingency or alternative would be to reduce the ridiculous amounts of money we're spending at the federal level? every single american, every month has to balance their checkbook. they got to figure out how much money i have to. >> pay. should i mess with you. >> know, i don't i don't think i've ever even written a check. but the point is, the point is, laura, people have to balance how much money they're spending on a monthly basis. shouldn't

the federal government have to do the same? >> say that the most brilliant thing that the republicans are doing here is making democrats like me come on and defend usaid. that most folks don't even know. that's just 1% of the of the whole thing, right? we're supposed to be talking about gas and groceries and how we're different vision than donald trump. and i have to sit here and defend the irs. that's a bad position for a democrat to regular folks. >> sounds like that's exactly the way i. >> like you guys running on that, chuck. >> about that, we'll leave shermichael to go balance the checkbook. you need to. michael chuck rocha, thank you both so much. remember when pam bondi said we should investigate? the investigators? well, now she's the attorney general, and she's making good on that promise. ordering a new directive that's rattling not just the fbi, but even the state level and federal prosecutors and later did the mission to shrink the government, just turn into a counterintelligence disaster. why the cia is now on edge and worried that agents may have been compromised

knock, knock. >> number one broker here for the number one hit maker. >> thanks for swinging by, carl. >> no problem. so what are all those for? >> this let's me adjust the base, add more guitar, maybe some drums. >> wow, so many choices. >> yeah. like schwab, i can get full service wealth management advice, invest on my own and trade on thinkorswim. >> you know, carl is the only front man you need. >> oh i got to take this carl. >> schwab. schwab. >> have a choice in how you invest with schwab. >> i'm a howie mandel the newest ambassador of skechers. funny story how i became an ambassador i went to the store and i lied and said i was an ambassador. do i get a discount? the owner called me and said, would you like to be an ambassador for skechers? and i said, yes, try skechers. slip ins. >> want a next level clean swish with the whoa of listerine? it kills 99.9% of bad breath germs for five times more cleaning power than brushing and flossing alone. get a next level clean

with listerine. feel the wo. >> weight loss. >> for so long. >> i felt stuck, but set bound means change. set bound is for adults with obesity to help lose weight and keep it off. >> activating two naturally occurring hormone receptors in my body. it works differently. >> it's changing what i believe is possible when it comes to weight loss. it's changing how much weight i lose up to 48 pounds. >> and changing what happens. >> don't take if allergic to it, or if you or someone in your family had medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. type two. tell your doctor. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, stop, set bound and call your doctor. if you have severe stomach pain or a serious allergic reaction. severe side effects may include inflamed pancreas or gallbladder problems. tell your doctor if you are experiencing vision changes. taking a sulfonylurea

or insulin, having suicidal thoughts if you're nursing pregnant or plan to be, or taking birth control pills. side effects include nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can cause dehydration and worsen kidney problems. >> zep bound means change. >> and when it comes to weight loss. >> change is good. >> discover the weight loss you could be bound for. talk to your doctor about zep bound. >> this is what joint pain looks like when you keep moving with aleve. just want to leave 12 hours of uninterrupted joint pain relief. aleve strength to last 12 hours. >> ontario, canada stable and secure when the world around us isn't, you can rely on us for energy to power your growing economy and for critical yeah, it is weird that we still call these things phones. well, yeah. they're more like mini computers. precisely, next slide. xfinity mobile customers are connected to wifi 90% of the time. that's why our network has powerboost with wifi speeds up to a gig where you need it most. so, this whole meeting could have been remote? oh, that is my ex-husband who i don't speak to.

hey! no, i'm good to talk! xfinity internet customers, cut your mobile bill in half for your first year with xfinity mobile. plus, ask how to get the new samsung galaxy s25+ on us. counts ten and two boss. start your will at trust and will com and make it count. >> i'm donie o'sullivan in greenland and this is cnn all right. >> tonight there's a new attorney general in town and her

name is pam bondi. she now runs one of the most important departments to president trump. for weeks, people have wondered what would she do when she showed up at the doj? the one who vowed to go after investigators. >> in the department of justice. the prosecutors will be prosecuted. the bad ones. the investigators will be investigated because the deep state last term for president trump, they were hiding in the shadows, but now they have a spotlight on them and they can all be investigated and the house needs to be cleaned out. >> so with that pam bondi show up, or this one, the one who vowed to end politicization. >> if confirmed, i will fight every day to restore confidence and integrity to the department of justice and each of its components the partisanship, the weaponization will be gone.

>> well, the wait is over tonight. we may just have our answer because in a memo, bondi says she'll establish a quote, weaponization working group. its aim to review criminal cases brought against trump by, you guessed it, former special counsel jack smith. but also manhattan da alvin bragg and the civil lawsuit brought by the new york ag, letitia james. with me now, brendan belew is a former federal prosecutor who resigned in protest over trump's decision to pardon most january 6th defendants. brendan, thank you for joining. when you hear that ag bondi is creating a weaponization working group. what do you think is the intent? >> i think it's an intent to rewrite history. the basic problem that the new attorney general has is that her boss, the president, committed a bunch of crimes, and so did a lot of rioters who were acting in his name for his legitimacy and for hers. they need to rewrite the history of january 6th. and

that's what i think this working group is meant to do. >> you know, one of the prosecutors who was fired for working on january 6th cases questioned bondi's decision to even review the cases. listen. >> and i do think it's a bit of a double edged sword for this administration to keep attacking january 6th, because, well, quite frankly, it may not end well for them because of the strength of the evidence and the strength of these cases. and as i used to tell d.c. juries, um, you don't have to take my word for it. you can look at the video because this is the single most recorded crime in the history of this country. >> could this probe actually backfire? >> potentially. you know, the way that the memo was written, seems that they are anticipating bringing criminal charges against investigators at the fbi, against prosecutors, potentially even against judges. i think it's questionable how much an appetite the american public has for those sorts of

political prosecutions, given that, as you just heard, the evidence about what happened on january 6th is incredibly powerful, and it is overwhelming. >> you know, january 6th cases, as you well know, they are a small fraction of the overall bureau's work. i mean, you've got immigration, you've got drug offenses, you've got violent crime. those all account for far more than the 1500 or so cases from january 6th, even in spite of the severity and gravitas attached to it. what happens to all that work that really is apolitical, completely in nature? if agents are suddenly fired en masse? >> yeah, i'm so glad you asked that, because, you know, this administration has been eager to talk about this weaponization order. they've been less eager to talk about a lot of the other things that they've been doing in the last few days, the fact that they pushed out the career acting head of the antitrust division. the fact that they are apparently trying to push out the career acting head of the tax division. the fact that they have disbanded the klepto task

force in the national security division. these are moves that are going to have one effect, and that effect is that it's going to help a lot of rich people get even richer through committing crimes. >> now, you were actually a prosecutor when trump tried to ban people arriving from majority-muslim countries, and you called the public protests at that time enormously helpful. how so? >> i think people outside of government don't understand how powerful outside voices and protests can be. they can empower people at the bottom or in the middle of a bureaucracy to understand the stakes of a decision, to understand the legality or illegality of a decision, and to push back against policies that are discriminatory, corrupt or illegal. and so i hope that in the coming months, people don't underestimate their own power here. >> brendan bolu, thank you so much for joining us. i want to

talk more about this issue with cnn legal analyst elliot williams and staff writer for the atlantic and longtime national security journalist shane harris. elliot, the wait is, in fact, over. we now know what the first move was going to be in this overall chess game. um, investigate the investigators. what's the risk? >> there's a profound risk. and look, if prosecutors or anyone in government has broken the law or if there is a serious allegation that somebody has broken the law, then of course they ought to be investigated and prosecuted for it. but this notion that merely having worked in government or merely having served across administrations is itself evidence or indicative of disloyalty to the president or a crime, is just nonsense. having served in both democratic and republican administrations and quite frankly, laura, like i was a democratic political appointee at i.c.e. with an incredibly conservative workforce there. yet somehow the work still managed to get done because people manage to sort of work

with folks that they don't agree with. this idea that somehow the government is tainted by people who are there to undo it is simply false. >> and of course, i mean, there's always the risk when you try to go through someone else's trash, they might find your own dirt. and if you are trump and others, there's a risk for that as well. although it's unlikely the doj would pursue him in any way in this junction. but what do the agents believe life might be like under a.g. bondi? >> well, i think that the fbi right now is having this enormous scrutiny placed on them simply because they worked on cases that were assigned to them. and to your point, fbi agents work regardless of who the administration is. they do not pick their cases. they are assigned to go investigate possible violations of the law, which is what they did. i think they're looking at the acting leadership of the fbi right now. and attorney general bondi. and the message to them is anybody who might touch the president's sphere of influence or his interests, maybe you need to think twice about whether you're going to be working on that case. it's a profound chilling effect. it does not work this

way. this is not how apolitical law enforcement works in the united states. and i am confident that those agents right now understand that and are shocked the way we are now. >> it's also important to note that we're not just talking about searches at donald trump's house that personally affected him at mar-a-lago. we are talking about investigations of january 6th that in many regards have very little to do with donald trump, the defendant himself. what you have is documentary evidence, video evidence, testimony, live eyewitnesses and compelling evidence that went to grand juries and were blessed by judges. that led to people getting convicted. this idea that somehow now we need to reach into january 6th cases to protect the president of the united states is also nonsense. these are righteous cases that no one seems to have. credible evidence were brought with some tremendous bias against the former, the current president. >> so yeah, call me crazy, but i don't want a person investigating crimes to look over their shoulder towards the white house. i want them looking

down at the evidence itself. but, you know, maybe i'm crazy here, but the cia did send the white house an unclassified email listing of all employees hired by the agency over just the last two years to comply with the executive order that was issued. it included their first name. it included the last initial, which, of course, raises some fears that not everyone is going to be joe smith and have a non-identifiable name. does this put a risk on their lives? >> it certainly puts a risk on their cover status if they're working undercover and their ability to work in the intelligence community or overseas. these are people who've worked for two years or less. and importantly, that means they don't have the same civil service protections as other officers who've served longer. why might the white house want their names? you might suspect it might be because it would be easier to fire them one day. so the cia did send those names over. and because this was an unclassified setting. and by the way, these names are going over to the office of personnel management, which is currently run by elon musk and his friends. they are not going to identify in an

unclassified email the full names of people who might be working undercover. so the compromise the agency tried to reach was, we'll give you their first name and their last initial. this really just underscores how risky this whole transmission was. if the opm and elon musk really felt they needed these names, there are ways to get those names in a classified setting. that's not what happened here. >> how do our allies who have a working relationship with our cia, how must they be feeling? >> i talked to a lot of them, and they are deeply troubled. they have been so, frankly, since the election because they feared that this kind of outright politicization of apolitical intelligence and law enforcement was coming. they see it happening now, and they are very nervous. they're worried about the fbi and the cia being distracted and not being good partners with them, because they need information that we collect for their security. they're worried about what happens to the intelligence they share with us. can we keep it secret? will we abuse it? will we be looking for names of people who are working for them? this is a really critical situation right now, and allies are looking at the united states, who they've

worked with in some cases, had partnerships with these agencies for decades and are wondering whether these values are really still in play anymore. >> it's obviously our own vulnerability with such a level of attrition., that too. >> and, you know, when you start targeting people for what you believe, what the government starts targeting people for, what is believed to be their political or personal views, you start raising serious free speech and first amendment questions. these are government employees and the government is targeting them for what it believes their views to be. that is a serious breach of, frankly, centuries of precedent in the united states that people are allowed to hold the views they have. and we're not even talking about the views they have. it's just the views that the government thinks they have. so there's a whole host of things here. there's legal issues. there are lawsuits that these folks can bring, and it's just simply wrong as a moral matter in our government, and it's going to make us less safe as a country. >> laura profoundly stated, both of you, thank you so much. elliott williams shein harris, thank you both. look, if you were surprised by president trump's proposal to take

control of gaza, turns out you weren't alone. far from it, by the way. so how off guard was everyone at the white house? really, it is a proposal. even actually still a proposal. that's next. >> the boeing 747 has crashed in the lockerbie area., trying to find out the why of it became everything. >> nothing is what it seems in the lockerbie story. >> lockerbie. the bombing of pan am flight 103, february 16th on cnn. with fast signs. see the visual possibility in your business with signs and graphics, you can save anything. transforming your space begins at our place. fast signs. make your statement before the spotlight. >> we struggled to keep the lights on. i saw more for myself and sophie gives members the financial tools to see more for themselves. join the official bank of the nba. sophie, get

your money right. >> from recent grads. >> to rising stars to living legends. >> you got this. >> thank you. vanguard retirement solutions 50 years of helping investors be well on their way to their financial goals. >> i love that my daughter still needs me, but sometimes i can't help due to burning and stabbing pain in my hands. so i use nervive. >> nervive clinical dose of ala reduces nerve discomfort in as little as seven days. >> now i can help again. feel the difference with nervive. >> touches of black. they say a lot without having to say much. they stand for elegance, refinement and prestige, even a little can go a long way. and though they're darker than the darkest night, they make you see everything in a new light. the kia x-line nightfall collection. >> kia movement that inspires.

>> it's really been a gift having mom live with us. but as a nurse, my training told me she needed more help than i could provide. so i connected with a place for mom, my senior living advisor understood our unique situation. she quickly recommended communities and set up tours. a place for mom helped us get to a decision and now mom is so well cared for. >> talk to an expert senior living advisor today at no cost to your family. >> the itch and rash of moderate to severe eczema disrupts my skin night and day. despite treatment, it's still not under control. but now i have rinvoq. rinvoq is a once daily pill that reduces the itch and helps clear the rash of eczema fast. some taking rinvoq felt significant itch relief as early as two days, and some achieved dramatic skin clearance as early as two weeks. many saw clear or almost

clear skin. >> rinvoq can lower ability to fight infections before treatment. tests for tb and do blood work. serious infections, blood clots some fatal cancers including lymphoma and skin. serious allergic reactions, gi tears, death, heart attack and stroke occurred. cv event risk increases in age 50 plus with a heart disease risk factor. tell your doctor if you've had these events. infection hep b or c smoked are pregnant or planning. don't take if allergic or have an infection. >> disrupt the itch and rash of (wife) this is the place we chose for our honeymoon? (husband) well, the listing says it's a

“modern rustic haven in a quaint rural setting.” plus, we got it for a steal! (wife) maybe 'cause it's a barn? (burke) if it's important, it's not worth compromising. which is why with farmers, you don't have to compromise quality to get great savings on your insurance. i saw a nice hotel down the road. little less pungent. (wife) yeah. (burke) shall we? ♪ you'll get it. upgrade your wardrobe today and get 15% off at jack archer.com/tv. >> cleanup on aisle six, please. white house officials walking back. president trump's remarks about the united states taking over gaza. here's trump's secretary of state, marco rubio, today versus trump yesterday. >> the only thing president trump has done very generously, in my view, is offer the united

states willingness to step in and clear the debris, clean the place up from all the destruction that's on the ground, clean it up of all these unexploded munitions. seriously, it was not meant as a hostile move. it was meant as a, i think, a very generous move. >> given what you've said about gaza. did the u.s. send troops to help secure the security vacuum? >> we'll do what is necessary. if it's necessary, we'll do that. we're going to take over that piece that we're going to develop it. >> and there's more. white house press secretary karoline leavitt today versus trump yesterday the president has made it clear that they need to be temporarily relocated out of gaza for the rebuilding of this effort. >> i do see a long term ownership position, and i see it bringing great stability to that part of the middle east and maybe the entire middle east. and everybody i've spoken to. this was not a decision made lightly. >> as for the reporter trying to

get some clarification from leavitt, that was reuters white house correspondent jeff mason, who joins me now. so glad to have reuters. sorry to have you here, jeff. thank you. is is trump's administration on the same page as him when it comes to his plans on gaza? >> well. >> it. >> sounds like his. >> plans on. >> gaza were. >> written by hand by him on his note. cards last night when he was meeting there and holding this press conference with prime minister netanyahu. i was told by a white house official that he briefed his team ahead of time, so it wasn't a complete surprise to the people around him. but the fact that they're doing some cleanup, as you say today, is a reflection of the fact that this hasn't been a this hasn't been a policy that they've been working on in the situation room for weeks and weeks. he's only been in office, of course, for two and a half weeks. that said, he has laid the groundwork for it a little bit. he started well. he started speaking, i think, about ten days ago on air force one when he was taking questions from the pool about the need for

palestinians to relocate. so that germ of the idea, not the piece of the u.s. taking over gaza, but palestinians going somewhere else. he started talking about not almost two weeks ago. and and then it came to this yesterday when he said that gaza should be owned and operated essentially by this country. >> you know, on that point and this is not a statement to be taken lightly. when an american president makes a statement about relocating people and then owning a particular area, you actually had another question for the white house press secretary about who actually owns gaza. i remind you. >> yesterday he spoke about the u.s. owning gaza, who owns gaza now, and how would the u.s. acquire ownership? >> well, gaza is currently run by iranian backed terrorists in the middle east. hamas, who we all agree. i think everybody in the region agrees that can no longer stand.

>> that wasn't really an answer to the who would actually own it and how you would acquire the ownership of it, of course. and is that part of the problem with this very theoretical proposal at this point then? >> well, and that was the reason i wanted to ask. i mean, if the president used the language of ownership, he didn't use the language of saying, we want an international body to come in. we want to administer this through the united nations. he didn't give any sense of what authority he had or legal right he had. and so i was looking for that in an answer, and it didn't come. but i think that is something that will keep pressing on. if this idea continues to germinate, i would say, you know, at the beginning of this segment, you said walk away or excuse me, walk back. they did walk back a little bit, but they didn't walk away. both secretary rubio and karoline leavitt were still underscoring the fact that this was something that trump wants to do. >> well, i, i see your ten day mention ago on air force one, and i raised you about a year ago with what son in law jared

kushner had to say, proposing a similar idea about a year ago. listen. >> in gaza's waterfront property, it could be very valuable to if people would focus on kind of building up, you know, livelihoods. you think about all the money that's gone into this tunnel network and into all the munitions. if that would have gone into education or innovation, what could have been done? and so i think that it's a little bit of an unfortunate situation there. but i think from israel's perspective, i would do my best to move the people out and then clean it up. >> coincidence? >> you know, jared kushner, like his father in law, is a developer. they look at the world in this in this way, real estate. i don't know if it's a coincidence he's not in government now. he was in government during the first term, but he's not now. but either way, whether it's something that got germinated in president trump's head because he spoke to his son in law or heard that, or because it was just something that he, as a former or still kind of current real estate developer himself, just saw this nice piece of land

and thought, let's make this proposal. it's hard to say, and it really doesn't matter. at the end of the day, that doesn't answer the questions about the legality. it also doesn't fix the contradictions that have come out over the last 24 hours. i mean, he says the u.s. will own it. and yet karoline leavitt today said he's not going to spend any money on it. he says that the u.s. will will take over. and yet, she said today he has not committed to sending any troops there. so there's there's zero clarity about how this would work even if it were legal. >> those questions are shocking considering he said it next to the israeli prime minister, who seemed to revel in the idea as if it had been said for the first time to him. >> yeah, didn't object to it. >> he did not. jeff mason, thank you so much. up next, president trump signs an executive order called keeping men out of

women's sports. his allies, they are thrilled. his critics, they're pouncing. but how does your view on the transgender debate stack up with the rest of the american public? cnn's harry enten standing by with some revealing numbers for us next. >> it's apparent. >> nice going, lou. nothing like a little confidence boost to help ease you back into the dating scene. of course, that also includes having a smile. you feel good about. fortunately, aspen dental specializes in dentures and implants made just for you with affordable options and flexible ways to pay. and now they're $0 down plus zero interest if paid in full in 18 months. helping our patients put their best smile forward. it's one more way aspen dental is in your corner. >> liberty. liberty mutual is all she talks about. since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. liberty. >> hey, kid. >> it's pronounced liberty.

>> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> now she's mocking me. very mature. >> hey! that's enough, you two. >> hey, i'm not the one acting like a total baby. >> she's to. >> only pay for what you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty. >> liberty. >> hey, neighbor. >> you supposed to t-mobile. >> home internet yet? >> trim your hedge. >> it's 35 bucks a month with no price hikes. damn. it runs on t-mobile's wireless 5g network. so all you got to do is plug in one cord. >> t-mobile 5g home internet. just 35 bucks a month. and with price lock, we won't raise your rate on internet. i did it. >> i switched to. >> t-mobile home. >> internet and i am loving it. >> don't sneak up on me like that. tap into etsy for original and affordable home in style pieces like lighting under $150 to brighten your vibe for under $100, put your best look forward with vintage jackets or pick up

custom shelving for under 50 to make space without emptying your pockets and get cozy with linen robes for 75 or less. for affordable home and style finds to help you welcome whatever's next. etsy has it. >> and power. >> so handsome. >> oh. >> i can't buy this. >> whoa, whoa. your empower investment account has grown. you earned it. so get good at money so you can be a little bad. empower icy hot ice works fast. >> heat makes it last. feel the power of contrast therapy. so you can rise from pain. icy hot. taxes was feeling so stuck. now taxes is having a turbotax

expert who does your taxes from start to finish. >> flip it over. flip it. i've been overthinking. >> why are you checking? any time. >> till there's nothing left. >> and get the most money. back on your time. now this is taxes. >> when the temperature drops, you've got two choices. close your eyes and think warm thoughts. or open your eyes and get out here. there's only one vehicle lineup that embraces everything the cold has to offer. the official vehicles of winter jeep. there's only one during the jeep presidents day sales event. get $7,500. total bonus cash allowance on 2024 jeep grand cherokee, overland and summit models. see your local jeep brand dealer today. >> my eyes. >> they're dry. >> uncomfortable looking for extra. >> hydration. >> now there's blink nutri tears. it works differently than drops. blink nutri tears is a once daily supplement clinically

proven to hydrate from within, helping your eyes produce more of their own tears to promote lasting, continuous relief. you'll feel day after day. try blink neutral tears a different way to support dry eyes. >> blink tears. >> cnn this. >> morning with kasie hunt tomorrow at 5:00 eastern. >> with this executive order, the war on women's sports is over. >> president trump signing an executive order calling called keeping men out of women's sports. it's designed to stop trans women from playing women's sports. >> with my action this afternoon, we are putting every school receiving taxpayer dollars on notice that if you let men take over women's sports teams or invade your locker rooms, you will be investigated for violations of title nine and risk your federal

funding. there will be no federal funding. >> now he's centering this on title nine, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs or activities. it's a 180 from the biden administration. biden's white house said schools are in violation if they bar trans students from participating on sports teams. the trump white house, they say allowing trans women to play on women's teams, that takes away opportunities from biological women. so what does science say? well, the research is limited, but in october 2023, study found that gender affirming hormone therapy, quote, reduced if not erased, any physical attributes that could give an advantage to a trans woman. so what's public opinion say about the matter? joining me now, cnn's senior political data reporter, harry enten. harry, tell me, what are you seeing in these numbers? >> yeah, i.

>> think these numbers are really illuminating on this topic, because i just think there's such a clear trend among the american public. so transgender female athletes in women's sports, only 18% of the country says that they should be, in fact, allowed to participate in women's sports. compare this to the opposition. i mean, my goodness gracious, 79%. you rarely get 79% of the country to agree on anything, but they do in fact agree on the idea of opposing transgender female athletes in women's sports. but it's not just the here and now, laura. it's not just the here and now. what we're actually seeing is a trend on this particular issue, and it's going in the direction of opposition. so take a look here. okay. transgender female athletes and amongst those americans who oppose them in women's sports back in 2021, it was 62% a majority. but you know, not anywhere close to a ginormous majority, right? a clear majority, but not a ginormous majority. but then again, you look here in 2025, you see it at 79%. so it's not

just that the majority of americans are opposed to transgender female athletes in women's sports. it's that the opposition has become considerably larger in just the last four years. >> how does this break down across party lines? >> yeah. so, you know, when you get 79% of americans to agree on anything in this case, opposition to transgender female athletes in women's sports, you got to believe that it's the majority across all parties. and that's in fact what we see. so transgender female athletes again oppose in opposing them. in women's sports you get 67% of democrats. so two thirds there, you get 64% of independents. you get about two thirds there. and then look at this near uniformity among republicans, 94% of republicans in opposition, you rarely get 67% of democrats and 94% of republicans to agree on anything. but they do on this particular issue. but it's not just that republicans are in opposition. it's the strength of that opposition. okay, republicans who strongly want to

ban transgender, transgender female athletes from women's sports get this. it's 84% who strongly want to ban them. and that is actually larger than the amount of republicans who strongly want to deport all immigrants in america who are here illegally. so that just gives you an understanding of how strong the opposition is among republicans. it is really strong when it comes to banning transgender female athletes from women's sports. laura. >> it's very illuminating. harry enten, thank you so much. >> thank you. >> ahead, it was the kamala harris interview that sparked a $10 billion lawsuit from trump. now the fcc is releasing the transcripts from cbs that refute his election interference narrative. brian stelter is here to take us through it all. next. >> i've got good news, and i've got bad news. what do you want first? the bad. the news is newsy even more than ever. >> what's the good news? >> we're doing another season of have i got news for you.

>> have i got news for you returns. february 15th on cnn. >> what's up? you seem kind of sluggish today. >> things aren't. >> really moving. you could use some metamucil metamucil. >> psyllium fiber helps keep your digestive system moving so you can feel lighter and more energetic. metamucil keeps you moving and try the two week challenge at metamucil. com. >> how do you sleep at night. >> on a mattress from mattress firm? they have. >> the nicest beds and i wanted to upgrade. i sleep. >> all night long. >> get matched at mattress firm, sleep at night. >> an alternative to pills. voltaren is a clinically proven arthritis pain relief gel which penetrates deep to target the source of pain with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine directly at the source. voltaren the joy of movement at morgan. >> stanley old school hard work meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real.

>> it's halftime. >> time to. >> go to the bathroom. >> never slams the shower. >> and count how many full. >> baths. >> you have. >> it's a jack and jill. >> selling your home to open door is so easy. you can do it during half look out, cause here i come. >> have you always had trouble with your weight? same. >> discover the. >> power of wegovy with wegovy. i lost 35 pounds and some lost over 46 pounds. >> and i'm keeping the weight off. >> i'm reducing. >> my risk. >> wegovy is the only. >> weight management. >> medicine proven to reduce risk of major cardiovascular events such as death, heart attack or stroke in adults with known heart disease and obesity. >> don't use wegovy with. >> semaglutide or glp one medicines or in children under 12. don't take if you or your family had mtc men2 or if allergic to it. tell your provider if you plan to have surgery or a procedure, are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to be. stop taking and get

medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or any of these allergic reactions. serious side effects may include pancreas inflammation and gallbladder problems. call your prescriber if you have any of these symptoms. wegovy may cause low blood sugar in people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to treat diabetes. call your prescriber about vision changes. if you feel your heart racing while at rest, or if you have mental changes, depression or thoughts of suicide may occur. common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, flu or upset headache, feeling tired, dizzy or bloated, gas, and heartburn. some side effects lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. >> with wegovy. >> i'm losing weight. >> i' dave's been very excited about saving big with the comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. five years? -five years. and he's not alone. -high five. it's five years of reliable gig speed internet. five years of advanced securit. five years of a great rate that won't change. it's back. but only for a limited time.

high five. five years? -nope. comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. powering five years of savings. powering possibilities. comcast business. (♪♪) now for something you can both agree on a sleep number® smart bed is perfect for couples the climate360® smart bed is the only bed that cools and warms on each side and all our smart beds adjust the firmness for each of you let's agree to agree on better sleep. save 50% on the new sleep number® limited edition smart bed plus free home delivery when you add a base. plus 0% interest for 48 months. what makes all the difference. >> this is cnn. >> the world's news network. >> closed captioning brought to you by. >> book.com. >> if you or a loved one. have

mesothelioma, we'll send you a free book. >> to. >> answer questions you. >> may have. call now and we'll come to you. >> 808 two one 4000. >> conspiracy theory. now out in the open cbs news releasing the full transcript and video of their 60 minutes interview with then presidential candidate kamala harris. it's the interview that launched an investigation by the fcc and a $10 billion lawsuit against the network by donald trump after he alleged the network, quote, doctored the interview to make harris look better and help her win the presidential election. now, here is the exchange between harris and 60 minutes correspondent bill whitaker as it aired on the show. >> it seems that prime minister. >> netanyahu is not listening. >> we are not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for. >> the united. >> states. >> to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end. >> and here is harris answer.

without the edits as released today. >> well, bill, the work that we have done has resulted in a number of movements in that region by israel that were very much prompted by or a result of many things, including our advocacy for what needs to happen in the region. and we're not going to stop doing that. we're not going to stop pursuing what is necessary for the united states to be clear about where we stand on the need for this war to end. >> cbs also releasing a statement today saying, as the full transcript shows, we edited the interview to ensure that as much of the vice president's answer to 60 minutes, many questions were included in our original broadcast. while fairly representing those answers. here to discuss is cnn's chief media analyst, brian stelter. brian, good to see you. does the transcript prove cbs's point?

and and why didn't they just release the raw footage to begin with? >> yeah. >> number one, yes, i believe. >> it does. it shows. debatable, but normal editing practices. it does not prove any deliberate distortion. donald trump on the campaign trail last fall said that cbs committed election interference. he said they threw out one answer. they replaced it with another. this proves the opposite. this shows that cbs showed two different parts of the clip, but cbs did not distort what harris said, and it didn't seem that bad. what she said frankly, she was asked a tough question. she didn't have a great answer. cbs did air it. this should be a non-story, and so often we end up in trump's unreality, where he takes something small. he makes it very big. he makes it into a big scandal. he claims it's the end of the world. there are months of ramifications as a result. and that's exactly what's happened here. his choice of fcc chairman brendan carr has decided to make this a big deal. he knows trump is suing over this. and so it's become a big

scandal. and what are we talking about? we're talking about one clip from a cbs 60 minutes interview. this has been driving cbs crazy, but it's because cbs was not transparent that they ended up in this position. it's exactly what you just said. if they had released all of this raw material back in october, we wouldn't be here in february. >> is that a dangerous precedent to set, though? i mean, obviously, many viewers might not be aware that. >> journalists often produce. interviews are saying that brendan carr is weaponizing the fcc, including some of his colleagues at the fcc. the democratic commissioner, anna gomez, released a statement today saying this should be dismissed. this should be put to bed. but instead of saying, case closed today, the fcc chairman brendan carr, who is trump's appointee, he is saying he's going to open this up to public comment. he's going to let this go on for at least another six weeks. in other words, he's going to prolong the pain for pbs. i'm sorry for cbs by keeping this an ongoing issue. and this is not just a matter of cbs. brendan carr is probing.

pbs is looking into npr. he's investigating a radio station in california. he sent a letter to disney right before christmas. he is trying to advance trump's anti-media agenda on a number of different fronts. >> as i was mentioning, viewers might not know that outlets, both on television and in print, they oftentimes edit down interviews for clarity or length. is transparency, though the lesson here, obviously no one endeavors to, nor should distort a statement to benefit anyone. it should be simply the reliance of information, even if it is edited down for the length of it. is the new game in town essentially going to be that transparency? having that raw footage, has this changed fundamentally how outlets might deal? >> well, i think number one, cbs should have been transparent from the get go. but even transparency is not always the answer, because transparency can also be used against news outlets to create the the idea of a of a of a problem when there actually isn't one. look what's happening right now with

this government spending database. people are cherry picking data, misinterpreting what's out there in the public domain, pretending that there's scandals when there are not. >> brian stelter really important to keep following this story. thank you so much for doing so. i think it's going to have major repercussions. as you can imagine. >> yeah. >> hey, i want to thank all of you as well for watching this evening. anderson cooper 360. that's next tonight on 360. >> the president's takeover. >> plan for