tips. and then it also gives people tip fatigue. they don't want to tip at all. and people deserve to be tipped. >> i think we need an executive order on this one. oh gosh. >> gosh. >> you could be responsible for the white board. you could be responsible for the next 8020 trump issue. >> that's true. >> all right. this will debut old man scott tonight. i did not like the bright headlights on modern cars. i drive down the road. i look at these headlights. i am completely blinded by them. i don't understand the technology or why it's happening. i just know that i cannot see. can we please have headlights like what we had when i got my driver's license, and which enabled me to both see the car and the road and not drive off into the side of a ditch. bad. bright headlights. >> you know, i think you're right about that. those types of headlights, they're designed for you as the driver to be able to see, but nobody else can see on the. >> road. insane. it's even worse. >> glare. terrible, guys. >> great job. i would vote for every single one of

>> breaking news tonight. president trump's doj looks to bail out new york city mayor eric adams with a stunning order to drop his corruption case. former mayor bill de blasio is standing by to react. plus, the constitution may be bending, but will it break? the new fears that trump will simply ignore the courts that are putting him in check. and what happens when two billionaires fight over the future of openai? well, we might be able to find out soon. tonight on laura coates live. day 22 of donald trump's second term is raising this major question. is his administration messing with those scales of justice? well, tonight trump's doj is moving to drop the federal corruption case against

new york mayor eric adams. the democrat was facing five charges for bribery and corruption. he had to go on trial this very spring right before his reelection campaign kicks into high gear. but a doj memo is telling manhattan prosecutors to put an end to all of it. you might be wondering. wondering why? and actually, the memo lays out the very reasons they're telling them to. first, it says the case has been tainted by publicity and could impact witnesses for a jury pool. and the jury as well. and here is the second quote. the pending prosecution has unduly restricted mayor adams ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime that escalated under the policies of the prior administration, unquote. and last time i checked, a prosecution getting in the way of your job does not mean that criminal charges get to disappear. a lot of people in

court actually have jobs as well. it also goes without saying that immigration is at the very top of trump's agenda. not surprisingly, of course. it's especially curious, though, when the doj says it made this decision without even looking at the strength of the case. mayor adams has denied doing anything wrong ever since he was charged back in september. now, he claims it's all politically motivated for his critique of biden's immigration policies, even though there's no evidence that we see right now of that and his initial reaction tonight, he says he needed to find out more from his lawyer. >> i think that i would like to speak with him first and get a better understanding of exactly what's taking place now, because right now i don't have any information. as i'm sitting here, calls are coming through, but we're looking to find out what's going on. >> we know cnn spoke with his lawyer and he says the mayor would have been acquitted in 45 minutes. now, when you see what

mayor adams has been up against these last several weeks and what he's been up to in the last several weeks, that may not come as all that surprising. i mean, he was at trump's inauguration before that, he went down to mar a lago in october. before the election, trump compared the mayor's problems to his own. >> i know what it's like to be persecuted by the doj for speaking out against open borders. we were persecuted, eric. i was persecuted, and so are you. eric. >> i want to bring in cnn chief law enforcement and intelligence analyst john miller, who is deputy commissioner of the nypd. he also served under mayor eric adams, also here, cnn legal analyst jennifer rodgers, formerly of the s.d.n.y. i'll begin with you here, jennifer. what a lucky break for this mayor compared to what he has been charged with. huh? >> yeah, it's a dark day, laura. for those of us who worked at doj, and especially

s.d.n.y, because this is a corrupt deal, since watergate, you have had these independent processes in place so that the white house doesn't actually use politics or personal preference to influence criminal cases. so this is what we're seeing today. the reasons for this is that this is a quid pro quo arrangement between adams and president trump. adams gets his case dismissed. and in exchange, trump gets to have the mayor of new york city under his thumb for as long as he can hold on to city hall for his immigration priorities and whatever else he wants. so that's what this is about. and it's just a shame that after all of these years, even through the first four years of trump's presidency, s.d.n.y. managed to hold on to its independence. and it's gone now. and, you know, as you mentioned, the memo even admits it's not about the substance of the case. it's not about what adams did. it's about the president and what the president wants. so i think

it's it's a real shame. and, you know, the reasons given in the memo are laughably ridiculous, to be honest. so i just think it's a very good day. >> now, of course, we don't have any proof or evidence that there is a quid pro quo that he agreed i will do x. in fact, one of the reasons that mayor adams has said in the past, um, why he feels he was persecuted, john, is because he had gone against and bucked the system under biden, aligning himself with the views of trump. but jennifer's point is not is not missed on anyone that the idea of the s.d.n.y, which used to be called and known as the sovereign district of new york. tongue in cheek, is very different these days. now, if they're able to say, get rid of it. the memo goes on to point out, and i mention this to you, john, the pending prosecution has unduly restricted mayor adams ability to devote full attention and resources to the illegal immigration and violent crime that escalated under the policies of the prior administration. so i do wonder, have these charges. have they

really derailed his mayoral duties? >> well, it's certainly and nobody would disagree with this. a tremendous distraction for a chief executive, especially of a city, to be under the kind of pressure that comes with being under indictment on federal charges, having to prepare a defense that would be a distraction for anyone. but i think the memo from deputy acting deputy attorney general emil bove is dripping with political implications in every line because it talks about the weaponization of government, that this only happened to adams after he criticized the biden administration. it talks about the migrant problem in new york and that, you know, he's needed to be focused and fighting on that. so it joins a lot of trump issues together. but taking the wider aperture here. um, eric adams, in some way, with this case being thrown out at the request of the department of justice, becomes a validator for

the narrative of the weaponized government that went after critics. so in that way, it helps donald trump with his story line as well as, as jennifer pointed out, the mayor is going to be owing to the president and the administration that made this happen. and remember, it was dismissed without prejudice, subject to review by president trump's u.s. attorney appointee after the election. so what it says is, if eric adams suddenly goes south politically on the white house, they can bring the case back. >> mhm. that's the hook, jennifer. and the idea of that sort of damocles hanging over his head. and in fact the prosecutor tapped to lead the fdny for now at least, danielle sassoon seems to be stuck between a rock and a hard place. and so how do you think the fdny prosecutors should actually and will react? should she actually dismiss the case? would she lose face? would the morale be affected? would this be a

chilling effect on any cases that even arose during the biden administration? >> well, i don't think she has a choice, laura. i mean, the s.d.n.y. is not an independent office, right? it's part of doj. and so when the attorney general or someone acting as the attorney general tells you to dismiss a case, you really have to do it. so i think danielle's job was to fight for the case, to push back, to tell them that they wanted to keep their independence, that the case was a righteous case and a strong case. and once they say no, we're going to make you dismiss it. i don't think she has a choice. i think it does affect the morale of the office. i think if you're at sdny today and frankly, anywhere at doj, you have to be thinking about what you're going to be asked or forced to do over the next four years and whether that comports with your own sense of integrity and character, whether it's the job you signed up to do. but, you know, that is kind of more of a general thing. i don't know that danielle saying i refuse to walk the piece of

paper over to the courthouse is really going to do anything at this point. >> i have to wonder what the defense bar thinks about all this in terms of who's getting cases dismissed and who's not, and how this bodes in front of the judges as well, who will obviously hear more cases from this very office. john miller. >> also, john, you also have to remember there's a long history of similar bribery cases, whether it's congressman stevens or the mcdonough case or sheldon silver from the new york state assembly. you know that there is there is a narrative that it's a weak case because the quid pro quo and the bribery count isn't really there, and a lot of those got reversed on appeal, even though the memo says we're not making any judgment on the case. >> a really important point and a good segue to our next guest, john jeffries. jennifer, thank you for both joining me. i want to continue now with mayor of new york, former mayor of new york, bill de blasio. mayor, thank you so much for joining us. what's your reaction to

this, given some of the commentary that this case presented as week initially, did you share that view? >> oh, absolutely, laura. i mean, i felt instantly it was week. and when i read the whole indictment, i was shocked that it ever got to the point. it did. look, i want to emphasize that clip you showed to donald trump. i was at that dinner, the al smith dinner, and he said what he said about eric adams. and then he went on to rather strongly attack me. and so i am no apologist for donald trump, to say the least. but i also think it's fair to say we should objectively look at the facts when a prosecution brings a case. if the charges are weak, um, we should not defer instantly to the voice of prosecutors any more than we should any other part of the government or the private sector or anything. i looked at that case and i said something. something doesn't add up here. i don't necessarily assume it was because of anything that was going on in washington or anything political. uh, southern district is a place that's known to be a home for people of great ambitions. i experienced some of that myself in dealing with the

southern district. in 2017. john miller was working for me at the time, but. >> the but they didn't. they didn't actually look at the strength of the case, though. i mean, that's that's the thing. i mean, i can hear where you're going with this, but they didn't actually look at the assessment of the case. they consider something very different. and in fact, emil bove, who, you know, was counsel for donald trump at one point said the justice department has reached its conclusion without assessing the strength of the evidence or the legal theories on which the case is based. wouldn't it just been stronger if they had even endeavored to do that, or even said they had to demonstrate your point 100%? >> i don't know. >> why. >> they didn't. they actually, laura, i think it's i can't speak for them. i'm telling you, as i'm not a lawyer also. but but looking at an indictment that had no evidence attached to the person who was indicted, everything was about what other people around him did, or about things that were not criminal, like taking, you know, upgrades on flights. and look, i don't agree with mayor adams on a lot of things, but i also want to say that it's not fair for

someone to have these charges brought against them in a kind of flimsy way that really did distract him from his work. i don't think it was fair to begin with. so if it was going to be reassessed, i agree with you. i think it should have been done on the merits. but there is a second point they made, which has been traditionally recognized that proximity to an election, we the primary election for mayor in this city is, you know, four months away, four and a half months away. so if something like this hangs over, it does affect the democratic process. i think in the end here now, eric adams has a chance to go out and say, you know, let's talk about the record. let's talk about the issues and make his case to the people. i think before this, that was really difficult. and so, you know, ideally yes. thank you mayor. >> excuse me i know i want to i don't want to cut you off, but i do i am curious particularly you're in a very unique position here as a guest of this show, in the sense of having been a mayor of new york city. he emil bove maamau suggests that it is such a distraction

and it takes away from your ability to actually govern as mayor, having this over one's head understandable. however, if someone were engaged in behavior that was either unethical or criminal, should the office itself shield you from being prosecuted because it might be a distraction? >> no. very fair point. laura, i want to emphasize we've got we've got multiple pieces here. if this was let's say it was an incredibly strong case that was brought last year, i think we'd be having a very different discussion. uh, in fact, a very weak case, in my opinion, was brought a strangely weak case. so from my point of view, it's right for the justice department to say there's not enough here to go on. and there's an election in four and a half months, and they need to step back. and they have stepped back in the past in close proximity to the election. i agree with you. i think they should have done that more on the merits. but the original sin here, if you will, is why was such a weak case brought many times we heard there be superseding charges that went on for months and months and months. where were

they? they never showed up. so in the end, i actually think the people of new york city now get a chance to judge eric adams on the work he did or didn't do, like they can they can decide that, but it shouldn't have been because a single prosecutor brought a case that proved to actually have a lot of holes in it. >> well, i do wonder how that is different than what most prosecutors do when they bring a case. they have a probable cause finding. they have to try the case to prove beyond a reasonable doubt and, um, i certainly understand your views on the strength of the matter. it was also detailing straw men and being and using campaign related contributions in ways that were distinct from what was actually stated. but this case is likely to be dropped, and not a lot can be done to change that, even though there is that without prejudice emotion of it. before i let you go, i am curious about the decisions today. trump also pardoning rod blagojevich. now both of these cases show democratic lawmakers facing corruption charges of some kind, albeit for very different reasons. does this

suggest anything to you about trump's motivations or priorities? >> look, i think it's convenient to trump's narrative. and again, i have absolute disrespect for the way trump is going about subverting the constitution right now. so i want to be very clear. i'm looking at this particular matter in new york on its own particularities, sure, but no writ large, writ large. do i think there is a certain glee in trump world that being able to play out their ideology with democrats, of course, i think it's convenient to their narrative. i don't know enough about the specifics in the illinois case, but i think we can look, what is that famous saying? maturity is the ability to keep two contradictory thoughts in mind at the same time. i think we can look at the specifics of a case while simultaneously saying, what's happening in washington right now. the politicization of the justice department, taking away the standards that we all learned from watergate. no one is above the law. those are all

endangered right now, and we have to fight. but at the same time, if an individual is not being treated fairly or our local democratic process isn't being treated fairly, we have to look at that as well. >> i prefer to walk and chew gum at the same time, but you're starting a much fancier, more highbrow mayor bill de blasio, thanks for joining us tonight. up next, another day, another round of court rulings against president trump and elon musk. but tonight, there's some serious fear that they may be preparing to ignore it. what happened then? one of our favorite constitutional legal minds, kim whaley, is standing by to unpack it all. and later, as if elon musk isn't busy enough. wait till you hear about the major a.i. offer that he is now making believe me, when it comes to investing, you'll love carl's way. >> take a left here, please. but there's a way is the best way. >> is it at schwab? how i choose

to invest is up to me. >> exactly. >> i can invest and trade on my own. >> yes, and i let them manage some investments for me too. >> let's move on, shall we? >> no can do. >> i'll get out here. >> where are you going? >> schwab. >> schwab. >> schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. >> we're standing up for our right to be lazy. >> by sitting down. >> and reclining back. >> we work full time, and we parent full time. >> we will be reclined until further notice. >> it's our right to let the dishes soak overnight. >> and to mow the lawn tomorrow. >> wish we proudly declare that yes, we are still watching that. >> and no, we won't be cooking tonight. >> we, the lazy, are taking back lazy. >> by getting comfy on our la-z-boy furniture. >> la-z-boy. long live the lazy. >> we've always loved taking care of our home, but last year grandpa here broke his arm. we realized some home maintenance jobs aren't worth the risk.

>> that's what we call leaf filter to protect our gutters. >> leaf filters. patented filter technology keeps debris out of your gutters for good. >> they gave us a free inspection, and we had the system installed that week. >> my only regret is not calling him sooner. >> now we can focus on what we really enjoy. >> enjoying millions of satisfied homeowners. call 833. leaf filter today or visit leaf filter.com. >> remove any. >> and doug. >> you'll be back. emus can't help people customize and save hundreds on car insurance with liberty mutual. you're just a flightless bird. >> no, he's a dreamer, frank. >> and doug. >> well, i'll be. that bird really did it. >> only pay for what you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty. >> rising costs. selective coverage for countless americans. the complex specialty care they need is always felt

just out of reach at evernorth, we give members unrivaled access to the most complex therapies at the best prices, while providing enhanced support like in-home nursing at no additional cost. that's wonder made possible evernorth health services. >> when i started walton goggins goggle glasses, i had no idea what i was doing, but godaddy arrow does using a.i. to build a logo, website, and social content so i can let

800 two 677 54. call 802 677 54. >> lockerbie sunday at nine on cnn setback after setback after setback after setback after setback for president trump in the courts. >> just today. judges assailing trump for allegedly violating temporary orders blocking his freeze on federal funding, and his decision to fire most usaid

employees. judges also stepping in to block his orders that fired the head of the whistleblower agency, the office of special counsel, cut funding for public health research and forced employees to take part in a buyout program. tonight, trump lashing out at those rulings. >> judges should be ruling. they shouldn't be dictating what you're supposed to be doing. >> that's also ruling. but i digress. his vice president going a step further, suggesting trump should circumvent the court's orders. it's not a constitutional crisis yet, i suppose, but even some republicans may, and they have said vance suggestion might be a bridge too far. >> should the administration abide by that court order? >> i mean, that sort of system under the constitution. >> we have three co-equal branches of government, and the judiciary plays a critically important role.

>> with me now, constitutional law expert kim whaley, a professor at the university of baltimore school of law, a former federal prosecutor and also a prolific author. kim, glad you're here with us. you called the federal courts, quote the last bulwark against trump's assaults on the rule of law and constitutional order. so are the courts working as this co-equal branch, despite trump's seeming dismissal of them? >> well. >> in his distortion, really of them? yeah. i mean, this is the this is the separation of powers. no more kings, right? a king, an unlimited monarch. power comes from god. the king is the boss. no accountability. and our government flips that. and the people are at the top on an inverted pyramid. and the power trickles down. and the way you hold presidents accountable is congress either enforces its muscle, which it's not doing, or the courts decide that the

president is not complying with the law. and where does the law come from? the constitution or from federal statutes? and these judges are finding that donald trump, time and again, are violating both of those pillars of the rule of law under the american constitution? >> well, the vice president says that trump can defy these sorts of decisions. and as you've articulated all the different ways in which the courts are supposed to work. many are wondering if in the end, it's just a big. yeah. you and what army could enforce it? and this is the commander in chief we're talking about. what happens now? can they do anything to enforce it? >> well, i've said now for years, often with you, it's not so much. what does the constitution or the law say? it's what are the consequences for violating it if there's no consequences for violating it? it doesn't matter what the law says. it's like a speed limit if you won't get the ticket, people will speed. when you get it in the mail, you'll slow down and the courts don't have their own law enforcement. they have a u.s. marshals service,

but that's actually under the control of pam bondi, the attorney general. so it's controlled by donald trump. you know, the big question in this moment is if congress isn't going to push back, if the courts don't have a mechanism to enforce its orders, and we have a private citizen, elon musk, who's completely unaccountable under the constitution, i would go so far as to say we're not on the cusp of a constitutional crisis. laura. we're in a constitutional crisis. this is a power grab from all the other branches and outside the government. that is elon musk. he's he's not impeachable. he's not even firable in theory by donald trump. he's not on the federal payroll. he's not subject to the freedom of information act. all these checks and balances. so where is he? is he. >> findable? is he somebody you can actually find? i mean, obviously he's not the president as you articulated. he's a special government employee. he's not beholden to the same standards, whether you like that or not. but can the courts use finding for the most the

wealthiest man in the world? >> well, so if a court order has to bind him, first of all, and he's a private citizen. so all these lawsuits against trump aren't going to to bind him. there are there's a civil lawsuit, but taxpayers that are affected, for example, by his use or invasion of the treasury department information, your private information, if that comes back to hurt you because he has access to your bank account, if you ever got a, you know, a tax return by direct deposit, he has that information. there are ways you can sue. and to your point, you know, a billionaire can say, i don't care what you find me, i don't i'm going to do what i want or just let it sit there and hope and wait for the u.s. marshals to come and hold me in contempt. and his buddy donald trump can call call them off. uh, so, you know, the constitution is only so good as it's enforceable and enforced. and right now, donald trump kind of has his finger on the pulse of all the mechanisms to actually uphold the rule of law,

with the exception, really, of the states. >> of course, time and delay worked to his advantage in these cases when he was not president. and now this idea of discrediting the judiciary or discrediting what the prosecutors might think might come back to support him in the end. but i always say, and you talked about this with me, kim, be careful what you wish for at some point. rule of law. if it evaporates and educate. >> yourself, you know, you got to learn how the constitution functions if you're going to uphold it. >> well, there you go. read one of your books for this. kim whaley, i tell you, she's prolific. thank you for joining tonight. >> always a pleasure. >> up next, democrats are beginning to ponder a critical question. should they be willing to shut down the government in order to push back against donald trump and elon musk? my panel will be here tte that next. plus, president trump's revealing answer when asked who might wear the maga

crown once he leaves. >> do you view. >> vice president jd vance as your successor? the republican nominee in 2028? >> have i got news for you is back. >> for. >> another season. >> roy wood jr., amber ruffin and michael ian black are finding the funny in the week's biggest stories. >> to give you all four years of something to talk about. >> if we alive. >> have i got news for you saturday at nine on cnn. >> and i can't fight this feeling anymore. >> whenever heartburn strikes, get fast relief with tums, it's time to love food back. also try tums gummy bites. >> the itch and rash of moderate to severe eczema disrupts my skin night and day. despite treatment, it's still not under control. but now i have rinvoq. rinvoq is a once daily pill that reduces the itch and helps clear the rash of eczema fast. some taking rinvoq felt significant itch relief as early as two days, and some achieved dramatic

skin clearances early as two weeks. many saw clear or almost clear skin. >> rinvoq can lower ability to fight infections before treatment, tests for tb and do blood work. serious infections, blood clots, some fatal cancers including lymphoma and skin. serious allergic reactions, gi tears, death, heart attack and stroke occurred. cv event risk increases in age 50 plus with a heart disease risk factor. tell your doctor if you've had these events infection, hep b or c smoked are pregnant or planning. don't take if allergic or have an infection. >> disrupt the itch and rash of eczema. talk to your dermatologist about rinvoq. >> learn how abbvie can help you save. >> living with your. albuterol asthma rescue inhaler it's a bit of a dinosaur. albuterol only treats your symptoms, not inflammation. a cause of asthma attacks, treating symptoms and inflammation with rescue is supported by asthma experts. finally, there's a modern way to treat symptoms and asthma attacks. air supra is the first

and only dual action asthma rescue inhaler fda approved to treat symptoms and help prevent asthma attacks. air supra should not be used as a maintenance treatment for asthma. get medical help right away if your breathing doesn't improve or worsens, or for serious allergic reactions like rash, mouth or tongue swelling, trouble breathing or swallowing, or chest pain, using air supra more than prescribed could be life threatening. serious side effects include increased risk of thrush or infections, or heart problems like faster heart rate and higher blood pressure. welcome to the modern age of dual action asthma rescue. ask your doctor if air supra is right for you. >> aga khan. cheri mossburg. >> jon fraenkel. >> to all. >> those who never give a second thought to being the first ones

in. thank you. servpro, proud supporter of our nation's first responders. >> with verizon, anyone can trade in any phone, in any condition and get the new samsung galaxy s20 five plusthr

sugar. the future of soda is now. poppy soda is back. i'm valeria leone in mexico city, and this is cnn. >> president trump riding high. three weeks into his term, his approval rating is above 50%, according to a poll from cbs news. but and there's a big but here. there are weighty battles ahead, and one of them involves the looming deadline to fund the government. lawmakers have only until march 14th to pass a bill to keep the federal doors open, and some democrats are urging the party to play hardball as trump takes a wrecking ball to federal spending.

>> we should be very clear with the american people that the house is governed by a republican majority. the senate is governed by a republican majority, and the white house has a republican president. and if they want to pass their agenda, republicans need to conjure up the votes for them to pass their own bills. >> with me now, shermichael singleton, a cnn political commentator and republican strategist, and michael larosa, former special assistant to president biden and press secretary to first lady jill biden. glad to have you both here. which, michael, i'll start with you. michael, for a moment here. so democrats, they have let's just say they've struggled to come up with a game plan. and i wonder if this is the right approach you feel to force republicans to go at it alone. >> the government spending bill. yeah. that's where they have leverage. the. look, democrats are out of power in order to use power, you have to win elections. so democrats need to

instead of focusing on the argument, need to focus on just winning elections. right. the only leverage that democrats have is over congress. that's the turf we can play on. we can't play at the federal agency level. this is the same. these are the same laws. he he broke in 2019 that got him impeached in the first place. except we don't have subpoena power this time. we can't haul in people or whistleblowers. we have no oversight authority on the federal agencies. >> so what should. >> they do? we have to focus on we have to move the battlefield. the battlefield is not at the agencies. all of these things he's doing? yes. is he flooding the zone? is he doing a lot? of course he is. it's all toothless, though. it can all be overturned by the next democratic president. but the democrats can fight because what aoc said is correct. they cannot keep the government open without democratic votes. they need us. we can extract concessions from them over there on the budget

field. >> so you're smirking. why? >> i mean, he's partially right. i mean, you're going to lose some republicans. that's just the reality of this. every time we have these conversations, we have a very difficult time keeping all of our members. we have a very slim majority this time around. this is probably the best opportunity democrats have in terms of leverage to answer your question. but i do think republicans have an opportunity to make an argument to the american people every night, every month, every single person in this country has to balance their personal budgets, paying their mortgage, their rent, car, note electricity, gas, activities for their children. we don't have unlimited credit cards in our personal homes. why in the world should the federal government have an unlimited slush fund of money, and then put that on us back on democrats? so republicans need to argue, yes, we're going to pay bills that we've already accumulated debt for. right. but going forward, whatever continuing resolution we pass, there needs to be cost savings attached to that future spending. if democrats don't want to pass that, put that on us again, back on them. >> well, i wonder how democrats

would feel about owning that particular burden of there. would it be a feather in their cap or an albatross around their neck to be the ones to say, shut down the government? >> we can't. we won't be, because, look, they're in charge of all three branches. they're in charge of the courts. they're in charge of the house, the senate and the executive branch. they will own a shutdown. it doesn't matter. they will own it. and so that is why we need to get away from dying on the hill of federal agency spending, which is not popular with middle america or any of the part of the coalition we need as democrats to bring those voters back. we are they have positioned themselves to be the watchdog of people's wallets. they have set us up to be the defenders of die in serbia and trans and trans operas in colombia. if you thought the the transgender ad of 2024 that that rolled on a loop in swing states was bad.

this will make it look like child's play. >> well, you know, one person who has been an ardent supporter, shall we say, of donald trump and his policies has been his own vice president. and yet, when he was asked about whether vance was in fact his successor. i want to play for you what he had to say. >> do you view vice president jd vance as your successor, the republican nominee in 2028? >> no, but he's very capable. i mean, i don't think that it you know, i think you have a lot of very capable people so far. i think he's doing a fantastic job. it's too early. we're just starting that's not very comforting for vance to hear. >> i think it's okay. laura. >> do you really think it's okay? >> it is too early. he's only been in office for, what, two and a half weeks now, and people are asking, what is jd? jd vance going to be your successor? who knows what's going to happen over the next 2 or 3 years? i think the president needs to sort of get in office, deliver on some of those promises. he's doing well on immigration. he appears to be willing to tackle some of the debt stuff that he promised. i think the third

trifecta of all of this, if you will, is bringing down cost of living. if he can accomplish all of those things, then let's have conversations about who his successor will be. >> well, yes, but the elephant in the room and it's a big one has been his suggestions about maybe even trying to have a third term. i mean, there is a technicality that you cannot be elected to the presidency. again, there are thoughts you could either try to ignore that amendment 22nd, i believe it is. or you could just say, try to remove me. or he could try to become a vice president and be elevated immediately. that's all the backdrop for him. >> look, yeah, i'm sure there's endless conspiracy theories about what he wants to do, but what he what he definitely does want is to control the attention economy. and he can't lose that control by saying, oh, yeah, this guy is going to be the next interesting. the next guy. and because, you know, then the press wants to travel with vance. they don't want to travel with a lame duck. he wants to be able to make that decision. he wants to be able to be kingmaker and and use that power of leader of the party. >> and every president wants

that, right? every president. i mean, look at your former boss. >> well, i don't think he had a choice. >> well, that sounded like shade. >> it was. >> not i mean, not not from you, from this one. well, yeah. my friend. okay. >> there wasn't much of a choice there. >> really, really quick, though. you mentioned the idea of all the other things, prices, the economy and beyond. why is he not prioritizing those? i mean, he's putting pennies literally before things like that. >> yeah. look, i think we need to get through march and figure out if we can pass a cr with the debt ceiling with republicans. then i think you begin to shift to figure out how do you bring down costs across the board, whether it's cost of living eggs, milk, gas, et cetera.? i do think you need to incentivize some of those corporations and businesses to figure out ways that they can leverage, maybe tax incentives to bring down that cost. so there are some tools in the executive's toolbox, i would argue, to incentivize that, thus bringing down costs for the average american. >> everything he's doing is old news. republicans have played with foreign aid and federal workers for decades. this is not

a new playbook. he is. >> $36 trillion in debt. mike. >> everybody anybody who has worked in government knows if you're ever going to actually he's going for low hanging fruit usaid. it's less than 0.47%. >> but democrats. >> are doing a budget. hold on, hold on, hold on. the point is where he won't go is where all the waste, fraud and abuse is. it's in entitlements. he won't. and look, we would love to see him try. we would we dare him to try to touch medicare and medicaid and social security. he won't do it for the same reason. we know he won't because he's too scared to do it. he's gone a. >> lot further than democrats. >> who have done absolutely. >> nothing to tackle. >> gentlemen, i would ask i would ask for more of your $0.02, but the president says that pennies are no longer applicable. shermichael singleton michael larosa. thank you so much, both of you. still ahead, she made history as the first black woman to serve on the nation's labor watchdog group, only to be fired by president trump. so what's she going to do now? when wilcox, standing by to share her story

and her response, plus the major salvo in the war over a.i., this time it's elon musk firing the shot with a multi-billion dollar offer to take over the maker of chatgpt. and tonight, openai's sam altman has a response. next. >> hi, susan, honey. yeah, i respect that, but that cough looks pretty bad. try this. robitussin. honey. >> the real honey you love. plus the powerful cough relief you. >> need. mind if i root through your trash? >> robitussin. the only brand with true source certified honey. >> this. >> delectable gnaw ramen noodle recipe will put an end to your drive-thru dinner rituals. throw that knorr bouillon in that tasty combo and delightful carrots in the rich touch of bok choy. make your own nord taste combo. it's not fast food, but it's so good. >> when you're the official vehicles. >> of winter, you can embrace everything the cold has to offer. leave fresh tracks with the safe and secure jeep grand cherokee melt limitations. with our most capable jeep wrangler ever, or battle the elements and

win in the jeep gladiator hurry into the jeep president's day sales event before these incredible offers slip away. during the jeep president's day sales event, get $7,500 total bonus cash allowance on 2024 jeep grand cherokee, overland, and summit models. see your local jeep brand dealer today. >> struggling with the highs and lows of bipolar one? ask about vraylar because you are greater than your bipolar one, and you can help take control of your symptoms with vraylar. some medicines only treat the lows or highs vraylar treats depressive, acute, manic and mixed episodes of bipolar one in adults. proven full spectrum relief for all bipolar one symptoms vraylar is not approved for elderly patients with dementia related psychosis due to increased risk of death or stroke. report changes in behavior or suicidal thoughts to your doctor. antidepressants can increase these in children and young adults report fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may be life threatening or uncontrolled muscle movements, which may be permanent. high

blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death. weight gain and high cholesterol may occur. difficulty moving tremors. slower, uncontrolled body movements, restlessness, and feeling like you need to move. sleepiness, nausea, vomiting, and indigestion are common. side effects may not appear for several weeks. visit vraylar. com to see additional side effects, ask about vraylar. abbvie could help you save. >> can your pet. >> absorb everything and stay fresh? >> always. >> flex foam can. it's the only pad made with the flexible foam core that locks in blood and sweat while the top stays dry, keeping you up to 100% leak and odor free. see what foam can do for you. >> i got this wow skin from olay body wash. it's new. super serum sinks into my skin with five powerful ingredients, five benefits in one. look at this olay difference. so luminous olay super serum body wash. >> my moderate to severe plaque psoriasis held me back, but now with skyrizi, i'm all in thanks to skyrizi, i saw dramatically clearer skin and many even

achieved 100% clear skin. don't use if allergic serious allergic reactions, increased infections, or lower ability to fight them may occur before treatment. get checked for infections and tb. tell your doctor about any flu like symptoms or vaccines with skyrizi. nothing on my skin means everything. ask your dermatologist about skyrizi today. >> i'm getting vaccinated. >> pfizer's pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. >> so am i because i'm at risk for pneumococcal pneumonia? >> i'm getting prevnar 20 because pneumococcal pneumonia could put me in the hospital, and my risk is six times greater because i'm over 50. >> the cdc. just expanded. >> its recommendation for those. >> 50 or older to get vaccinated. you're also. at risk if you're 19 or. older with certain chronic conditions. prevnar 20 is proven to help protect against both pneumococcal pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in just one dose. don't get prevnar 20 if you have a severe allergy to its ingredients, a weakened immune system may lower your response. common side

effects include injection site pain and swelling, fatigue, headache, muscle and joint pain. millions have chosen prevnar vaccines, which have helped protect adults for over a decade and have an established safety profile. >> that's why i chose prevnar 20. >> i want to be able to keep my plans. >> ask your doctor or pharmacist about prevnar 20. >> welcome back. >> have i got news for you? saturday at nine on cnn. >> elon musk today putting forward a nearly $100 billion unsolicited offer to buy back openai. that's the parent company of chatgpt. it's musk's latest attempt to regain control of the company he co-founded in 2015, before leaving it in 2018. ever since, he's been increasingly critical of openai's efforts to make a profit. to that end, the lawyer for the musk led group making the offer wrote it's time for openai to return to the open source, safety focused force for

good. it once was. we will make sure that happens. openai ceo sam altman. altman. excuse me. wasted no time firing back on ex. of all places saying, quote, no thank you, but we will buy twitter for 9.74 billion. if you want. musk shot back with a one word reply directed at his former colleague, swindler, billionaires and a war of words over a.i. what could be more 2025 than that? joining me now, new york times technology correspondent mike isaac. mike, good to have you on. i mean, you're reporting that there are some serious folks involved in musk's deal. one being a big time hollywood ceo, ari emanuel. but musk, he must have known that sam altman would have rejected this deal. so why even offer it? >> no. >> you're. >> totally right. and this is honestly the latest sort of salvo in this ongoing war between musk and altman. years ago, they founded openai together as a nonprofit entity.

and, you know, as this thing grew in power and stature, elon musk walked away. he's very much convinced that this is an a.i. could be very dangerous for the world. whereas sam altman thinks it's going to be transformative in a positive way. and so as elon broke off, this is his kind of way of trying to get back in. and potentially, if not take over the company, which will probably almost certainly be rejected of an offer, at least make it more complicated for altman to to to take it, make it a for profit entity. >> is there any chance that altman and openai may actually be forced to consider any of this? >> so this is the the interesting thing here. you know, they can reject the bid. it's a it's a private company. it's not like a hostile takeover in a public company. so they could reject the bid. the problem is they're trying to turn this company into a for profit company from its non profit status. and if they reject this nearly $100 billion

bid, they have to sort of tell charity regulators in delaware, hey this this company actually should be worth more than the 40 billion we were valuing it before. so they could reject it. but it actually complicates some of their financial maneuverings if they're trying to take it to to a for profit company. it's really a lot of like arcane math that that gives sam altman a big headache. >> i don't want to do math tonight. don't don't do that, mike. please move on to politics for a second and said, because the politics around this are remarkable when you consider that one of president trump's first acts, when he actually got back into the white house, was to bring in sam altman to announce a big deal, which musk then trashed. so could trump have to pick a side here, or is this going to get ugly? >> no, this is the other sort of shady, shadowy maneuvering around this whole thing. as you noted, sam altman, very quickly, uh, you know, they had this project called stargate in the works for months before

president trump took office, but specifically negotiated it with president trump to make it look like, you know, essentially let him take credit for it in the first few days. it's $100 billion deal that creates data centers across the country, partnering with softbank, the japanese mega conglomerate, and oracle, the big data powerbroker. and so, um, it gave trump an early win and it gave altman a real in to the presidency there. but i think elon is the other complicating factor here. and he might have to choose who he wants to help. as this continues. >> the complicating factor might be elon musk's middle name. we'll see. mike isaac, thank you so much. >> thank you for having me. >> up next, she was the nation's top labor board watchdog. that is until president trump suddenly fired her. now she's speaking out about what it's like being the tip of the spear in the fight against trump's federal purge. gwynne wilcox joins me next the

boeing 747 has crashed in the lockerbie area. >> trying to find out the why of it became everything. >> nothing is what it seems in the lockerbie story. >> lockerbie. >> the bombing of pan am flight 103. sunday at nine on cnn. >> ontario, canada. >> stable and secure. >> when the world around us isn't. you can rely on us for energy to power your growing economy. and for critical minerals crucial to new technologies. we're here right by your side. >> dupixent helps people with asthma breathe better in as little as two weeks. so this is better that two dupixent is an add on treatment for specific types of moderate to severe asthma. it works with your asthma medicine to help improve lung function. dupixent is not for sudden breathing problems and doesn't replace a rescue inhaler. it's proven to help prevent asthma attacks. severe allergic reactions can occur. get help right away for face, mouth, tongue, or throat swelling, wheezing or trouble

breathing. tell your doctor right away if signs of inflamed blood vessels like rash, chest pain, worsening shortness of breath, tingling, or numbness in limbs. tell your doctor if new or worsening joint aches and pain or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop steroid, asthma or other treatments without talking to your doctor. when you can get more out of your lungs, you can do more with less asthma. and isn't that better? ask your doctor about dupixent, the most prescribed biologic in asthma and now approved as an add on treatment for adults with copd that is not well controlled and with a specific marker of inflammation. >> my eyes, they're dry, uncomfortable, looking for extra hydration. now there's blink nutri tears. it works differently than drops. blink nutri tears is a once daily supplement clinically proven to hydrate from within, helping your eyes produce more of their own tears. to promote lasting, continuous relief. you'll feel day after day. try blink nutri tears a different way to support

dry eyes. >> blink tears. >> we're standing up for our right to be lazy. >> not literally, of course. >> we work hard. we deserve to scroll hard. >> it's the la-z-boy. >> presidents day. >> sale. >> find the lazy spot. >> you've been. >> missing. >> plus 0% interest for 48 months. >> we've earned. >> our lazy time. >> what she said. >> hurry in presidents day sale. >> going on. >> now. >> la-z-boy. >> long live the. >> lazy. >> how are folks. >> 60 and older having. fun these days? >> family cookouts playing games. >> dancing in the park.

dave's been very excited about saving big with the comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. five years? -five years. and he's not alone. -high five. it's five years of reliable gig speed internet. five years of advanced securit. five years of a great rate that won't change. it's back. but only for a limited time. high five. five years? -nope. comcast business 5-year price lock guarantee. powering five years of savings. powering possibilities. comcast business. .com was already taken. get 20% off and free shipping on your

first order at nuts. com. >> this is cnn, the world's news network. >> closed captioning brought to you by book.com. >> if you or a loved one have mesothelioma, we'll send you a free book to answer questions you may have. call now and we'll come to you. >> 808 two one 4000. >> well, trump's federal purge continues in one of its many targets, the national labor relations board. the white house removing two of its leaders in the late night email, effectively paralyzing the agency. why should you care? well, this the nation's top labor watchdog. it was created by congress in the mid 1930s, and the independent federal agency is tasked with enforcing the country's labor laws, safeguarding the rights of workers, even if they, by the way, are not part of a union. all in an effort to improve working conditions and also improve pay. investigating unfair labor practices and

overseeing union elections. my next guest is suing the administration after being removed from her post, a firing that she deems illegal. and gwynne wilcox joins me now. she is also the first sitting member of the board to be removed in its 90 year history. gwynne, thank you so much for joining. i'm sorry for the circumstances, but i would like to understand how did you find out about your firing and were you given a rationale for why? >> so thank you for your question, and it's really a pleasure to be here with you, even under these circumstances. and so i was at home on january 27th and around 11 p.m. i received an email from a white house staffer saying, speaking on behalf of the president, stating that i was being removed immediately, effective

immediately. and the best i can gather from the letter was that i was not. he wanted people who were more who were loyal to him and would issue decisions more consistent with his views, and that is actually in violation of the national labor relations act, which is an independent agency that is to be free of the influence, both presidential and other political influence. and i was and i was, you know, and my term ends in 2028. so i'm the first person ever in these 90 years to be removed from their position. >> what does that feel like to you? gwen, when you saw that and you read that and got some semblance of a rationale, how did you feel in that moment? >> i was very stunned and i you know, i also think back that i

was really surprised and shocked. it was just a lot of feelings going through me at that moment. and, you know, at 11:00, you know, close to 11:00 at night. there's i could not, you know, reach out to my agency at that point. and so it was not it was a restless night, let's say that. >> and the idea that you would not be or thought not to be in line with his interests, do you have any indication as to why he believed that to be the case? was there an instance, a situation you can even point to to make that clear? >> i really don't know of any specific issues. i don't i don't make decisions on my own. it has to be a majority decision, whether it's regardless of who the president is, who nominated a board member. we often come to consensus, and 80% of our cases. so i'm not certain, other than the fact that we've issued a lot

of important decisions in employees workers rights. and that's what our job is to do. >> in fact, recently the board took actions to protect the rights of workers at a variety of agencies and multiple companies, including elon musk's space x. do you think that musk had anything to do with your removal? >> i have no idea. i the letter was on behalf of the president, but as i stated earlier, that it's important to recognize that no one is to have impact on influence. the decisions of a board member and you. >> yeah, you said the administration is is testing the agency's independence, and you may have heard vice president jd vance now questioning judicial independence, saying, quote, if a judge tried to tell a general how to conduct a military operation, that would be illegal if a judge tried to command the attorney general and how to use her discretion as a prosecutor,

that's also illegal. judges aren't allowed to control the executive's legitimate power. when you hear that, what is your response? >> you know, i think that i don't know that i can really speak to the issue of judges, but certainly our system has been working for many, many, many years. and these challenges to the authority of the courts and also the legislatures, billy had been challenged during this just during these first couple of days or two weeks of this administration. >> very quickly. will you take this all the way to the supreme court if necessary? >> well, you know, we just filed this case last week. there is today we, my lawyers, filed a request for a declaration that my removal was unlawful. and so i'm hoping that this will be

expedited to so that myself and the nlrb can get back to work as soon as possible. so we'll have to evaluate these this case, as it goes along. >> still focused on the mission? >> yes. >> tony wilcox, thank you so much. thank you. >> and hey, thank you for watching. anderson cooper 360 is next. >> tonight on 360. >> a federal. >> judge rules that members of the trump administration are defying his court order. as the as the president and vice president raised concerns that he might make a practice of it. we're keeping them honest. also tonight, breaking news, the justice department telling federal prosecutors to drop the bribery case against new york mayor eric adams and later the president talking about acquiring >> thing like they're getting