>> lockerbie. sunday at nine on cnn. closed captioning brought to you by mae sot. com. >> if you or a loved one have mesothelioma, we'll send you a free book to answer questions you may have. call now and we'll come to you. >> 808 two one 4000. >> tonight on. >> 360. >> breaking news. a federal >> make peace, but does not say

ukraine will be an equal partner in deciding its own fate. and later, new research on ozempic how the drug that takes off pounds may also help with too many ounces of alcohol. good evening. thanks for joining us. we begin tonight with breaking news. a federal judge today handed the trump administration a major win. district judge george o'toole in boston said he is allowing the administration to move forward with its so-called worker buyout program for the moment. cnn's evan perez joins us now with more details. so talk more about this ruling. >> well, anderson, this is the first really big win for the trump administration. dozens of lawsuits have been filed over a number of executive actions that the president has taken in his first couple of weeks in office. and here the judge said that that that the unions who had sued the administration did not have standing essentially, they did not have anything to lose in bringing this in, challenging this program. now, this is a program called the deferred resignation plan, and it was offered to about 2 million federal employees. what it does is it promises them that if they

resign. the deadline was in the last few days, and actually the extended deadline was tonight at 7 p.m., that they would get pay and benefits through september 30th if they had signed up for this. now, the unions, which included the american federation of government employees, had sued, saying that congress has not even funded this program. and so there was a lot of uncertainty as to whether employees could even get any of the benefits that the trump administration was promising. and so what the judge here said, judge o'toole said, you know, first, he said the unions lacked standing to challenge this directive. and he also said that the plaintiffs are not really directly impacted by the directive. so the the issue here, then anderson becomes who can challenge this, this program and where this goes from here. obviously now the trump administration is hoping that they can use this program and others to try to reduce the federal workforce. about 65,000 people we know of that had

actually signed up for it so far. we don't know how many in all will take it. >> and any reaction from the white house? >> yeah, they're celebrating. as you pointed out, anderson, they've been criticizing the judges that have been ruling against the administration in the last few days. karoline leavitt said in a statement that this was the first of many big wins that they anticipate to have. we also have a reaction from the american federation of government employees, and they say that they're disappointed, but they say importantly, this decision does not address the underlying unlawfulness of the program. so they're going to continue trying to fight this, anderson. and what the judge laid out in his ruling today was simply that they have administrative ways for employees to challenge this if they want to, not through his court. >> all right. evan perez, thanks very much. now, the future of ukraine and who decides it, which seems to be in question this afternoon. the president said he spoke at length today with russia's vladimir putin about ending the war, which was

begun, you'll remember, with an act of russian aggression, he said. the two will have several summits, with the first likely to be in saudi arabia, and on social media said that both countries plan to, quote, have our respective teams start negotiations immediately, adding, quote, we will begin by calling president zelenskyy of ukraine to inform him of the conversation. what he did not say, either in that posting or later on camera, is just how ukraine would factor into these talks, which again, are about its fate and future. here he is in the oval office being asked directly about it. >> do you view ukraine as an equal member of this peace process? >> um, it's an interesting question. i think they have to make peace. their people are being killed and i think they have to make peace. >> it didn't really answer the question. the president also would not commit to restoring ukraine's pre-invasion borders, suggesting instead that kyiv would have to give up territory. >> would you support zelenskyy ceding territory or exchanging territory in any agreement to

end the war? >> well, he's going to have to do what he has to do. but you know, his poll numbers aren't particularly great, to put it mildly. >> when asked whether zelenskyy would be frozen out of the peace process, the president said, quote, i don't think so as long as he's there. but, you know, at some point you're going to have to have an election to. he did not say anything similar about vladimir putin. and if there didn't seem to be many comforting words for ukraine from the president, there was little either earlier today, from his defense secretary meeting with nato allies in brussels. >> we want, like you, a sovereign and prosperous ukraine, but we must start by recognizing that returning to ukraine's pre 2014 borders is an unrealistic objective. the united states does not believe that nato membership for ukraine is a realistic outcome of a negotiated settlement. >> now, those are very clear positions. the administration is taking. one question tonight is why take so many bargaining

chips off the negotiating table before talks with russia even get started? cnn's kaitlan collins asked the white house specifically about that today. she joins us now. what is the administration saying? >> well, we spoke to karoline leavitt about this. and then president trump himself was also asked later about this notion of whether there was anything that they would like to see happen before trump would agree to sit down with putin. we've seen that in other situations with world leaders. it was certainly a question that president biden faced time and time again about whether or not he'd sit down with president putin. and this is what karoline leavitt, the white house press secretary, said today. >> are there any preconditions that president trump has that president putin must do before he goes and meets with him, withdrawing some forces, withdrawing all forces, anything like that? >> not that i'm aware of. that doesn't mean they don't exist. but i was just talking with the president in our national security team. i wasn't made aware of any conditions, but if they exist, i'm happy to provide those. >> and on the president himself, you know, he styles himself as this master negotiator. he is now deploying these

negotiations, saying that they start immediately. we did hear from the defense secretary, pete hegseth, though, today saying that nato membership is not realistic for ukraine and neither is returning to pre 2014 borders. aren't they giving away bargaining chips before these negotiations have even started? >> again, i haven't talked to the president about ukraine's nato membership and he appointed several individuals to negotiate on his behalf. he's directly involved in these negotiations as well. and i'm sure if you ask him that question in the near future, when you're able to, he'll give you an answer. i just don't want to get ahead of him on it. >> now. of course, anderson, this is key because those are two things that vladimir putin really wants to to not have ukraine join nato and to also not have to return to the borders before 2014, before he illegally went into crimea. that was before even 2022, when he invaded ukraine. and so those are real questions when it comes to what this dynamic looks like going forward and what concessions president zelenskyy might be expected to make in terms of how they're talking about this negotiated settlement and how this war could end. and

so you saw president trump, obviously speaking very optimistically about his sit down with president putin happening. he said it likely will be in saudi arabia, though it's not set yet. but the questions are also what that looks like at the table. and who is at that table, including whether or not if president zelenskyy is there. >> yeah. it's also interesting saying that he had this conversation with putin and then was going to call zelenskyy. unclear if there was some sort of prior conversation with zelenskyy about this call with putin. what more do we know about the calls with both putin and zelenskyy? >> and he did call zelenskyy shortly after this. we know the call with putin was about 90 minutes. the kremlin told us that obviously there's translation typically part of that. that's why sometimes they're a little bit longer. and the call, according to the ukrainians with zelenskyy, i believe, was clocked in right about an hour. so still a pretty lengthy call between the two of them. and it's kind of a fascinating to watch this dynamic play out between these leaders, because obviously trump has a long history with president putin. we watched it closely in his first term, and with president zelenskyy. he is

someone that trump has always been skeptical of and never really has had this warm relationship with him like we've seen with some other world leaders. and so hearing him citing his poll numbers in the oval office tonight, when people were asking about president zelenskyy or an election being held in ukraine, those are signs that ukrainians definitely do not want to see here in terms of what their future is going to look like. and so it's a real question of how they handle this and how they navigate this. zelenskyy did have that meeting a few months ago with president trump, where they came out and spoke in front of the cameras. but it's a major question mark of what this looks like going forward and what the negotiations are as far as what zelenskyy can, can hold on to and how the united states plays a big role in that. but obviously, this has long been something trump has wanted to do. as soon as he took office, he promised to end this war on day one when he took office. and so we'll see how quickly they move here. >> yeah. kaitlan collins, thanks very much. we'll see you at the top of the hour of the source. joining us now is massachusetts democratic congressman seth

moulton, a marine corps veteran and member of the house armed services committee. he also traveled to ukraine during the war. so, congressman, president trump said that ukraine is unlikely to get all its land back and not going to be allowed membership in in nato. both of these are things that the kremlin would have wanted out of any negotiation. is it clear to you whether the u.s. or ukraine got anything from russia in return? >> it's pretty clear that they did not. i mean, trump and hegseth literally appeared to be negotiating on behalf of putin. they're trying to sell us on the things the kremlin wants. and it is everything wrong with running a good negotiation. i mean, it violates every principle of negotiation you can imagine. i mean, first of all, he's saying he's desperate for a deal. putin knows that trump is desperate for a deal. he promised the end of the war on day one, and he's already broken that promise. so now he's scrambling to get a peace deal, and he's selling the house before he or he's giving away the house, i should say, before he even puts it on the market. i mean, it's just crazy

negotiating tactics, unless you understand that trump is literally trying to sell us on what putin wants. >> is it possible he didn't know that his own defense secretary was going to be saying today about nato membership? >> i mean, there's a lot of chaos in this administration. i would agree with that. but this is one of the most important things that trump is going to do, because negotiating over the future of ukraine is not just about ending this war. it's about telling dictators all around the globe, especially xi jinping in china. whether or not democracies are going to stand up to authoritarian regimes that try to take over foreign countries. and we all know that if china decides to take over taiwan, it could literally start world war iii. you could see tens of thousands of american troops die in that kind of conflict. so there's a lot at stake with what's going on here. this negotiation really matters. we can't come out of this negotiation with putin thinking

that he has a win, and trump is already literally handing him victories before the negotiation has even really started. >> it was interesting because secretary hegseth laid out this vision of a security infrastructure in europe, of europe, taking the lion's share of responsibility for ukraine's security. do you think europe is actually capable of deterring russia from future aggression? do they have enough forces that would be needed to stay on the ground, on the front lines in ukraine? >> look, europe has stepped up big time to support ukraine. they've increased their spending on defense. and i'm all for that. i do want the the europeans to do more, but the whole foundation of nato, the whole principle behind nato is that america has the europeans backs. that's the way it's worked for 75 years. that's the way that we've deterred conflict in europe for 75 years. so if you suddenly take that off the table and say, oh, yeah, no, america's checked out. now, let's not let's not forget that trump has said this before, too.

trump has literally said, we will not support certain nato countries where he's trying to take away territory from some of our nato allies trying to take greenland away from. and this is just this is just totally nuts. and the problem is that it's very dangerous for the future stability of europe. and because we do have nato commitments, because that has been a bedrock of how nato works, the next time putin decides to start a war, because he said, hey, i got to win out of ukraine, let's go to poland next, let's go to latvia. next, american troops are going to be on the line. >> i want to play something that president trump said to reporters today and get your reaction. >> i have a secretary of treasury right now who's actually quite brave. he's over in ukraine on a train. and there's a lot of things happening around that train that aren't so good. and he's going there to get a document done where we're going to be assured that we're going to, in some form, get this money back, because we're putting up far

more money than europe, and europe is in far more danger than we are. >> how do you see that arrangement working out in the future? >> i mean, it's really unclear what he's trying to trying to ask for. i mean, i was i was actually just as a marine veteran, thinking about the fact that a commander in chief is telling the enemy where one of his top deputies is like, literally, he's on a train. you want to you want to kill a top official in the united states. you know what train he's on? i mean, this is a reminder that donald trump dodged the draft to get out of serving in vietnam. this commander in chief knows nothing about what it is to go to war. >> congressman moulton, i appreciate your time. thank you. i want to get perspective now from someone who, for whom defending europe was part of the job description. cnn military analyst, retired army general and former nato supreme allied commander wesley clark. also andrea kendall taylor, senior fellow at the center for new american security. general clark, how do you think these negotiations are going to impact america's nato allies with regards to their own security?

does nato have enough troops that they can police this actually, if you take away american troops, the answer is no. >> they don't have enough troops. they do need to spend more on defense. i'm glad president trump said move it up to 5%. that's great. they should have done that a long time ago. and actually we need to spend more on defense. but part of that is because we have a huge stake in the stability of europe. and if we don't support ukraine, we're going to lose that stability. just what congressman moulton was saying. and so this negotiation is going to end up asking for europeans to put troops on the ground. the question is, does the american military provide the backbone? are we going to provide the support, the air support, the intelligence support, the logistics support, the fire support to back these troops up or not? and if so, we're engaged. uh, it might then stabilize. but if it's the way it's being portrayed, it's up to

you europeans. uh, you know, we're really interested in china. um, look, this is the fourth time in a little over 100 years that we've seen instability arising in europe. we stayed out. world war one happened. we had to go in. we didn't learn our lesson. world war two. we learned our lesson after world war two. and now, apparently, we've forgotten the lesson again. we have another aggressor. he wants europe. he's not limited to being happy with half of ukraine. he says he wants to get at the root causes. well, the root cause is he wants more of europe and he doesn't believe ukraine should exist as an independent nation. so, um, we're not off on a good start on this. >> andrew. andrea, in december of 2021, russia presented nato countries with a series of security demands that one of them was nato. deploy no forces or weapons in countries that joined the alliance after 97, a commitment to no further enlargement of the alliance. do you expect putin to demand similar concessions to end this

war? >> yeah, i mean, i think it's clear that where putin stands is just leagues away from where president trump is. i mean, i think president trump is grossly misreading where the russians are, as the general was saying, at least in terms of ukraine. he is talking about getting at these quote, unquote, root causes of the conflict. and so for the russians, that means he wants leadership change in kyiv. he wants no nato membership, and he actually wants the ukrainians to amend their constitution to enshrine that in their constitution. and he wants to severely diminish the size and the capability of the ukrainian military that it can't. so it can't defend itself anymore. those are really serious concessions that he's asking for. and i think your point, anderson, is spot on that this for putin is about ukraine, but it's also about much more than ukraine. and you can be assured that president putin will be pushing the envelope to see how much he can get from a united

states, especially when president trump is making concessions before the negotiations have even started. >> general clark, i mean, ukraine is asking for security guarantees to, to to ensure peace. the defense secretary hegseth has ruled out boots on the on the ground. you talk about the united states providing kind of the back the backbone. what would that actually look like? >> you're going to have air power. you'd have air defense. you'd have logistics. you'd have intelligence. and there's a lot more to talk about on this, anderson, because something like this, you have to have confidence building measures so that if the russians do reinforce, it looks like an attack is coming, then what are you going to do? and besides, we haven't yet talked about reparations. we haven't talked about the 250,000 ukrainian children who've been abducted. we haven't talked about the war crimes. we haven't talked about the torture and the murder that the russians have committed in ukraine. it's as though this negotiation has started. it's like two little boys on the

schoolyard. you all are swinging at each other. let's us separate and let's be nice to each other. this country, russia, started a major war in europe. it is bent on aggression. it is the aggressor. it needs to suffer the consequences. and there's nothing in these negotiations that's been laid out thus far that's going to have russia pay any price. and that's a real bad signal for the rest of the world going forward. >> andrey, what do you make of the release of marc fogel? was that vladimir putin trying to curry favor with the new administration? >> absolutely. i mean, i think that, you know, trump is being manipulated by president putin. putin, from the time that trump entered office, has had nothing but compliments and nice things to say about the president. and now the release of this political prisoner was absolutely trying to shape the context in which these negotiations would move forward. but you be assured that he is manipulating him because, you

know, moments after the announcement was made of this phone call, an air raid sirens were continuing to to go off in kyiv and there were threats of a ballistic missile attack. and by the way, that's not the first time that president putin has escalated. after talking to the president, they had a phone call in the earliest days after trump was entered office or after he was elected, where trump asked him not to escalate. and what did president putin do? he used a brand new missile. the missile, which was a clear signal of escalation so consistently we see president trump being manipulated by putin. so that that is that is all part of this process. >> andrew kendall taylor, general clark, i appreciate your time. thank you. next, more on that court victory for the white house. but also complaints about judges from the white house and elon musk. do they have a point

or is this legal hardball playing out in public? also ahead, more breaking news. president trump now is the chair of the john f kennedy center for the performing arts. he said it was a unanimous decision by the board there, but there's new reporting on that from cnn's jake tapper ahead lockerbie sunday at nine on cnn maya knows how quality care can bring out a smile, but it's been a few dog years since she was able to enjoy a smile of her own. >> good thing aspen dental offers affordable, complete care all in one place. and new patients without insurance get $29 exams and x rays, plus 20% off treatment plans for everyone. loving our patients unconditionally. it's one more way. aspen dental is in your corner. >> come and get your love. >> tap into etsy for original and affordable home and style pieces like lighting under $150

to brighten your vibe for under $100, put your best look forward with vintage jackets or pick up custom shelving for under 50 to make space without emptying your pockets, and get cozy with linen robes for 75 or less. for affordable home and style finds to help you welcome whatever's next. etsy has it. >> let the conclave begin. >> why do i feel like a cow being priced by the farmer? >> the new york times raves it's every cardinal for himself in hands down, the best picture of the year. afi hails rare as the film that endlessly entertains and is a stunning cinematic achievement. >> i understand the trick is to offend no one. >> and now conclave is nominated for eight academy awards, including best picture of the year. >> let god's will be done. >> this year. have faith conclave, rated pg. >> believe me when it comes to investing, you'll love carl's way. take a left here, please. but there's a causeway is the

best way. >> is it at schwab? how i choose to invest is up to me. >> exactly. >> i can invest and trade on my own. >> yes, and i let them manage some investments for me too. >> let's move on, shall we? >> no can do. >> i'll get out. >> here where are you going? >> schwab. >> schwab. >> schwab. a modern approach to wealth management. >> the average dog only lives to be ten. that's ten birthdays, ten first summer swims, ten annual camping trips at the farmer's dog. we don't think that's long enough. that's why our freshly made food comes pre-portioned just for your dog. because a dog at a healthy weight can live a longer, happier life. >> boy. >> every day is true every day. >> ontario, canada. stable and secure. when the world around us isn't. you can rely on us for energy to power your growing

economy and for critical for all those making it big out there... ...shouldn't your mobile service be able to keep up with you? get wifi speeds up to a gig at home and on the go. introducing powerboost, only from xfinity mobile. now that's big. xfinity internet customers, cut your mobile bill in half vs. t-mobile, verizon, and at&t for your first year. plus, ask how to get the new samsung galaxy s25+ on us.

mesothelioma, call 1-800-217-1487 now or visit us at mae sot. fund.com. >> the she believes cup, stacked with challengers. >> bring the energy. >> let me tell you a little bit about baby girl. her whole life. she wanted to impress the world. >> this is really powerful to see your goals right in front of you getting to the top. we give 100%. we're all about winning. >> that one big dream that she knew she would have. and that's the win. the best of the best. the cream of the crop spectacular. >> in order to dream big, you have to have clear vision and continue to believe in yourself. >> the win i'll be eating all day. >> more on our breaking news tonight. a federal judge has lifted the hold on the administration's federal worker buyout program. that, and the larger backdrop to it now, the ruling from a boston judge who was appointed, by the way, by bill clinton, coming as it did shortly after the white house press secretary railed against just such district court judges many outlets in this room have been fear mongering the american

people into believing there is a constitutional crisis taking place here at the white house. >> i've been hearing those words a lot lately, but in fact, the real constitutional crisis is taking place within our judicial branch, where district court judges and liberal districts across the country are abusing their power to unilaterally block president trump's basic executive authority. we believe these judges are acting as judicial activists rather than honest arbiters of the law. this is part of a larger, concerted effort by democrat activists, and nothing more than the continuation of the weaponization of justice against president trump. >> now, along those lines, elon musk posted a kind of a weighted poll question of sorts online today. the proposition reads. federal judges who repeatedly abused their authority to obstruct the will of the people via their elected representatives should be impeached. yes or no. joining us now, former federal prosecutor jeffrey toobin, bestselling author and supreme court biographer whose newest book, the pardon, has just hit the

stores. also with us, former federal judge shira scheindlin. um, judge jeff, i mean, how big of a of a of a victory is this ruling? >> oh, it's definitely it's definitely a win for the trump administration. but what's worth remembering about all these cases, including the many so far that the challengers have won, is that these are all preliminary rulings. all of them could could be overturned in the district court, where the judges will now take fuller consideration, and then they will start working their way through the appeals process. so yes, this is a victory for the trump administration. and yes, the opponents of the trump administration have won a number of cases along the way. but all these cases have a long way to go before they are fully resolved. >> judge, what do you make of what the press secretary is saying there that the real constitutional crisis taking place is, is these these activist judges abusing their power? >> well, i couldn't disagree with that more. they're not activist judges. they're judges

doing their job and following the law. because in 1803, chief justice marshall said on marbury versus madison, the judge decides what the law means. so the judge is doing his or her job. a case is brought in, the judge doesn't bring the case. somebody brings the case to the judge. judge listens to both sides. judge makes judge makes a decision, follows the law as he or she sees it. so in no way do do i think they're causing a constitutional crisis or acting like a masquerading as a judge. >> you know, in fairness, i do. >> think it's fully appropriate to criticize federal judges. i mean, the press secretary, like everyone else, has a first amendment right. the claim of judicial activism is something that is raised all the time against judges, against judges on both sides. so i don't think we should, you know, be too fastidious about saying, you know, the press secretary is challenging the the independence of the judiciary. not that you said that. you didn't. >> say that. i have no problem with that. but the question i was asked, are they causing a constitutional crisis? no, i

don't think judges are causing a constitutional crisis. >> this judge wasn't ruling really on the merits. it was more that whether or not there was standing, standing. the people who brought the. >> which was the union and what what the judge said the union didn't have standing. they're not affected by this. it's the workers that are affected. so actually it's a it's a win, but it's a really small win. it looks good. so the trump administration can claim a win, but it's a very small win because they can bring it back with the right plaintiff and try again. >> the ridiculous elon musk question on x is a little closer to an outright threat. i mean, obviously no one's going to be impeached because of a question on a question on x, but, you know, when you start talking as vice president, vance did in a in a tweet on x about not not following the orders of the of judges. he didn't quite say that, but he certainly implied it. that's that's more

troubling. criticism is fine. and and one thing that was good that happened yesterday is president trump said clearly that he was going to follow court orders. that hasn't been a consistent message. >> he also said something about kind of looking at the judges, right. >> which again, is is is is a kind of threat. but, you know, first amendment rights. go to the president. >> by the way, jd vance said that three years ago when he was vice president, he was running for vice president. so he said what he said to get the job. but would he say now, today, we don't intend to obey orders? i don't think so. because as the president said, oh, i always obey court orders and i intend to do so. so i'd like to believe him this time, that he means what he says. >> the concern about federal judges being impeached is that is that real? >> no, it's absolutely not real. now, the term impeachment means theoretically, it could get voted. i don't believe that could possibly happen. this isn't bribery. this isn't treason. this isn't a high crime or misdemeanor. this is disagreeing with somebody's opinion. so i don't see an

impeachment. and even if there were to be articles of impeachment, there'd never be a conviction. >> i should point out the attorney general, the new attorney general, pam bondi, she declined to support musk's call for for impeachment. >> right. and you know that that shows she is part of the legal system in a more in a more conventional way. but, you know, musk has a lot of support, so it is worth keeping an eye on on how intense the criticism gets. >> yeah. jeff toobin, judge scheindlin, thank you so much. appreciate it. as always. up next, president trump, now in charge of one of the most iconic performing arts organizations in the country. he says it was a unanimous decision, but a source says that's not the case. we'll discuss this new front in the culture war with our jake tapper. also tonight, a lot of attention paid to elon musk's adorable son, who he's been seen with a lot lately, less well known musk concern about low birth rates in some places, which he considers a risk to the future of the human race. details on that ahead.

>> have i got news for you is back for another season. roy wood jr., amber ruffin and michael ian black are finding the funny in the week's biggest stories. >> to give you all four years of something to talk about. >> if we alive. >> have i got news for you saturday at nine on cnn. >> patients who have sensitive teeth but also want whiter teeth. they have to make a choice one versus the other. sensodyne clinical white provides two shades whiter teeth, as well as providing 24 over seven sensitivity protection. patients are going to love to see sensodyne on the shelf. >> got one more antwan. >> with usps ground advantage. just like you're with us every step of the way cool right on time. stay in the know from your dock to their door.

>> if you have heart failure or chronic kidney disease, pozega can help you keep living life because there are places you'd like to be serious. side effects include increased ketones in blood or you're in and bacterial infection between the and genitals, both which may be fatal. severe allergic reactions, dehydration, urinary tract or genital yeast infections, and low blood sugar. stop taking and tell your doctor right away if you have nausea, vomiting, stomach pain, tiredness, rash, swelling, trouble breathing or swallowing. tell your doctor about lightheadedness, weakness, fever, pain, tenderness, redness or swelling between the and genitals. ask your doctor about vasica today. >> an msc cruise. >> isn't just a vacation, it's a holiday. >> full of european style. >> and all the things americans love to come on bloom. >> there are a ton of football matches. >> games, football games. are you ready for some adrenaline? >> i was born ready. how high is

that? >> so high. >> privacy. >> privacy. >> gelato. >> froyo. >> architecture. >> architecture. >> that is a big hat. >> it's american. of course it's big. >> what a vacation. >> don't you mean holiday? >> my bad. >> we should stop now. >> yeah. >> when caroline has a cough, she takes robitussin so she can have those one on ones again. >> hey, jim, can we talk about casual fridays? oh, sure. what's up? >> get fast. powerful cough relief with robitussin and find your voice doesn't. >> before the spotlight, we struggled to keep the lights on. i saw more for myself. and sophie gives members the financial tools to see more for

casino slots for free and get 100 million coin bonus. goldfish casino slots. go for the gold.

>> closed captioning brought to you by mae sot book.com. >> if you or a loved one have mesothelioma, we'll send you a free book to answer questions you may have. call now and we'll come to you. >> 808 two one 4000. >> there's more breaking news tonight. today, president trump announced that in addition to being president of the united states, he is now chairman of washington's kennedy center for the performing arts. he was elected by a board that he recently shook up, replacing appointees by democratic presidents with trump loyalists. he claimed the election was unanimous, but a source familiar with that vote tells us it was not that there were both abstentions and no votes. as for the board, it now includes attorney general pam bondi, second lady usha vance chief of staff susie wiles deputy chief of staff dan scavino allison lutnick, who is the commerce secretary's wife. cnn's jake tapper obtained audio tonight of president of the president. and now chairman trump talking by phone with the new board. >> it's a very exciting development. it's going to be great. i think we're going to

do something very special. it got very wonky and some people were not happy with it. and some people refused to go. and we're not going to have that. we're going to have something that will be very, very exciting and we'll do things both physically and in every other way to make the building look even better. i think we're going to make it hot. and we made the presidency hot, so this should be easy. and it's just really it's great to have. i've just gone through all the names. it's great to have all of you with us. we're going to add a few more to get up to the whatever the number is that we're supposed to be up to, but it's going to be really exciting, really fun. i think you're going to enjoy yourselves and you're going to have a lot of good nights. also, nights and days watching performances of great artists. so thank you all very much for your time and for being willing to do it. but i think it's, uh, again, it's something a lot of people want, and i think it's something you're going to enjoy for a long time to come. and thank you all very much. >> well, joining us now is

cnn's jake tapper. so what more do you know about that vote? jake? >> well. >> the vote. >> to make. >> donald trump, president trump, the chairman of the kennedy., senator. kennedy center, was. >> not unanimous as he said was. >> there were. >> some votes. >> that were abstentions. >> there were some votes. >> against. >> um. >> but i mean, he has. >> packed it with loyalists. >> so so it. >> was. >> an overwhelming vote in favor. >> of him. >> and then there were two. votes after. >> that. >> um. >> president trump called in in the middle of the call. the first was to get rid of. >> the. >> current director, deborah rutter, who by all accounts, has done a really good job as director of the kennedy center. she was set to retire in august. anyway, um, but basically to fire her and then to replace her with ric grenell. and the president called in in the middle in the midst of the voting on that and spoke for about four or 4.5 minutes, and you showed a little you played a little. >> excerpt of that.

>> so for people who aren't in washington, i mean, the kennedy center is obviously it's probably best known for the kennedy center honors, as the program is broadcast around christmas time, usually honors big hollywood actors and musicians. well, president trump then and the new board now choose which artists are to be honored at the program. >> i mean, there is a there is a board of directors and they will supervise and they will be in charge of it. and, you know, a lot of the people that the president has appointed to the board are political appointees, such as his new chief of staff, susie wiles, his aide, dan scavino, um, the second lady, usha vance. et cetera. they will be replacing a lot of um, democratic appointees. uh, you know, president biden appointed his top aide, mike donilon. karine jean-pierre, et cetera.. um, hopefully the kennedy center will continue the tradition of letting the people at the kennedy center make the decisions about which artists

perform. you know, the kennedy center. we don't have a broadway like you fancy folks up in new york do, uh. >> i work. >> nights. >> so i don't get to go see these things. >> i know, i know, it's a tough life. the the we you know, we have some theaters, warner theater and and others, but but generally speaking, the kennedy center is where it's, you know, it's where i took my daughter to see hamilton. um, so there is just a lot of other business that goes on. um, but you heard mr. trump, president trump there talking about how it got to wokie. um, and i think that probably was a reference to the fact that there was a i believe i don't know enough about it, but there was some sort of a show involving transgendered or drag queen individuals. um, and so that that was what he was talking about. again, i don't know enough about that, but yeah, i mean, it is pretty remarkable for him to come in like he is and declare himself the chairman of the kennedy center. >> and the conventional wisdom was that in his first term that, you know, i guess the, the arts

and crowd crowd in washington wasn't all that welcoming to him. has that changed, do you think for the second term? >> i don't know that that's even true, that the arts crowd wasn't welcoming to him? i mean, first of all, the kennedy center does make an effort to not when they do their honors. um, you know, it's not just stuff that would appeal to blue states. there's usually there's a country music artist that's honored as well. i mean, they do make an effort to have a diverse slice of americana. um, and, you know, i can't speak to his, um, perspective, president trump, but i, you know, i don't think that the the kennedy center was hostile to president trump. i mean, the kennedy center does its job, and certainly people can take issue with this programing decision or that programing decision. but as a general note, it's it's there to be, um. there for for everybody, whether you're a house republican. i mean, i've seen when i've gone to kennedy

center events, there's always tons of democrats and tons of republicans. it just tends to be a nonpartisan affair. >> jake tapper appreciate it. thanks very much. thanks for calling in. >> thanks. >> coming up next, what elon musk is doing, including personally to increase the population of what he fights, what he sees as a threat to the existence of human beings in the future. >> the boeing 747 has crashed in the lockerbie area. >> trying to find out the why of it became everything. >> nothing is what it seems in the lockerbie story. >> lockerbie. >> the bombing. >> of pan am flight 103. sunday at nine on cnn. >> with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. my skin was no longer mine. >> my active psoriatic arthritis joint symptoms held me back. don't let symptoms define you. emerge as you with clearer skin with tremfya. most people saw 100% clear skin that stayed clear even at five years.

tremfya is proven to significantly reduce joint pain, stiffness and swelling. >> serious allergic reactions and increased. >> risk of infections may occur. before treatment, your doctor should check you for infections and tb. tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms or if you need a vaccine. >> emerge as you with clear skin. ask your doctor about tremfya. >> doctor u-box. there were many failed attempts to fix my teeth. i retouched all my wedding photos and it was even affecting my health. i trusted you because you specialize in dental implants. you created a permanent solution and customized my teeth. so it still felt like me. my new teeth have improved my life and changed my future. thank you. >> you're so welcome. >> get the smile you want from the number one provider of fixed, full arch dental implants in the u.s. schedule a free consultation.

>> keir starmer frank hilliker sergio gor. >> to all those. >> who. >> never give a second thought. to being the first ones in. >> thank you. >> servpro. >> a. >> proud supporter of our nation's first responders. >> type two diabetes. discover the ozempic tri zone. >> 000 ozempic. >> i got the power of three. i lowered my a-1c cv risk and lost some weight. >> in studies, the majority of people reached an a1c under seven and maintained it. >> i'm under seven. >> ozempic lowers the risk of major cardiovascular events such as stroke, heart attack or death in adults. also with known heart disease. >> i'm lowering my risk. >> and adults lost up to 14 pounds. >> i lost some weight. >> ozempic isn't for type one diabetes or children. don't share needles or pens or reuse needles. don't take. if you or your family had mtc me in two or

if allergic to it, stop taking and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or any of these allergic reactions. tell your provider if you plan to have surgery or a procedure, are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to be. serious side effects may include inflammation of pancreas, gallbladder problems, or changes in vision. call your prescriber if you have any of these symptoms. taking with the sulfonylurea or insulin may increase low blood sugar risk. common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, stomach pain, constipation. some side effects lead to dehydration, which may worsen kidney problems. living with type two diabetes. >> ask about the power of three with ozempic. >> ontario, canada your third largest trading partner and number one export destination for 17 states. our economic partnership keeps millions of americans working. we're here right by your side. >> from recent grads to rising stars to living legends.

>> you got this. >> thank you. vanguard retirement solutions 50 years of helping investors be well on their way to their financial goals liberty. >> liberty mutual is all she talks about. since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. >> hey, kid. >> it's pronounced. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> now she's mocking me. >> very mature. >> hey! that's enough, you two. >> hey, i'm not the one acting like a total baby. >> she's to. >> only pay for what you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty! >> i'm hanako montgomery in tokyo, and this is cnn. >> one of the lasting images from that oval office appearance yesterday by elon musk was the sight of his four year old son, known as x. he's the oldest of three kids that musk shares with canadian singer and songwriter grimes. x has been seen at other events with musk and the trumps,

including election night, which you see here. but one of the many issues that musk is interested in that hasn't gotten a lot of attention is declining fertility rates in some parts of the world. randi kaye tonight has a look at what he said. >> the team america. >> what keeps elon musk up at night? >> i do think about the birth rates plummeting as being a civilizational risk. >> in his eyes, declining. >> birth rates. >> in some parts of the world put us at risk for extinction. >> if people don't have more children, civilization is going to crumble. mark my words. >> is this why you have so many children? >> i'm trying to set a good example. yeah. you know, got to practice what i preach. >> practice what he preaches. indeed. musk has had 12 children with three different women. one of his sons, named x, is often in tow, just like he was at the white house this week. >> elon musk does see himself as this kind of global hero. this person who can save humanity, who has intelligence and capabilities above the regular person. it's not surprising that if he sees population decline as

a core issue for the future of humanity, that he himself would play a crucial role in trying to fix it. >> musk, who has been described as a proponent of in vitro fertilization, has denied a report in the new york times that he offered to donate his sperm to friends and acquaintances. >> he is quite preoccupied with global humanity level extinction problems. this is part of the why he's obsessed with getting us to mars. he's looking at a very long time scale and saying, like, the earth is inevitably going to have an extinction level event, and when that happens, we need to be ready. >> musk tweeted in 2022 that population collapse due to low birth rates is a much bigger risk to civilization than global warming. >> if the current compounding effect continues, you would see really many countries. become 5% of their current size or less within three generations. >> musk is right about declining birthrates in some places, japan's fertility rate, for

example, is at a record low and deaths outnumber births. in the u.s., fertility rates are also considered below replacement level. in march of last year, the lancet posted a link to its article declaring dramatic declines in global fertility rates set to transform global population patterns by 2100. still, demographer joseph shamai, who has studied populations for decades, told me musk has it wrong. >> those predictions are total nonsense. he's got so many things that he said that are wrong. the population of the world has quadrupled in the last. hundred years. his remarks about collapse of population is simply not consistent with the. >> facts. shami says musk is generalizing. >> there will be individual cases of countries that will face population decline because of low fertility, but world population is right now expected to go to about 10.5 billion by

around 2085. i do not think that anyone that's looked at the data will say that humanity is going to be extinct very soon. >> in a biography published in 2015, musk encouraged smart people to procreate. i'm not saying like only smart people should have kids. i'm just saying that smart people should have kids as well. i noticed that a lot of really smart women have 0 or 1 kid. you're like, wow, that's probably not good. >> we have to take immediate steps, i think, to increase the birth rate or there just weren't, you know, no, no, no new humans means no humanity. >> and randy joins me now. elon musk has actually donated money to research the population issue. >> yeah. anderson, the new york times is reporting that in 2021, elon musk's foundation donated $10 million to the university of texas to study fertility and population trends. so he's clearly concerned about the future of humanity. but the population expert who we spoke with today said that without immigration coming into this country, the u.s. would see

population declines within the next 5 to 10 years. but he also said that overall, the global population is increasing, adding another 2 billion people, likely by the end of this century. he also said that there are some projections that it would plateau eventually, and possibly even drop gradually after that. but anderson, i also mentioned that lancet article in our story. that article notes that by 2050, it projects that at least three quarters of the countries will see a drop in fertility rates, meaning that they won't be high enough to sustain the population in at least three quarters of the countries. anderson. >> and you mentioned japan. what other countries are facing population declines? >> well, certainly the u.s., without the immigration coming in, we will see a decline. but also china is seeing a big decline. the population expert we spoke with, demographer said that south korea is really one of the one of the biggest cases, seeing low fertility rates in a population decline. and in

italy, anderson, the pope, it's become such an issue there that the pope is encouraging married couples to have children. so we are seeing this around the globe. >> randi kaye appreciate it. thanks very much. coming up next, how weight loss drugs like ozempic may possibly help millions of americans trying to control their drinking. new study says that we'll take a look at it. >> have i got news for you is back for another season. that's right. more games. >> oh, i know. >> this final answer. >> points. >> more guests. >> how do you know everything? >> i'm smarter than. >> you. >> more mayhem. >> she goes to diddy party. >> roy wood jr, amber ruffin and michael ian black are finding the funny in the week's biggest stories. >> to give you all four years of something to talk about. >> if we alive. >> have i got news for you returns saturday at nine on cnn and stream next day on max. >> hey, neighbor. >> you switched to t-mobile. home internet yet? >> trim your hedge. >> it's 35. >> bucks a month with no price

hikes. >> bam! >> it runs on. >> t-mobile's wireless 5g network, so all you got to do is plug in one cord. >> t-mobile 5g home internet just 35 bucks a month. and with price lock, we won't raise your rate on. >> internet i did it. >> whoa! >> i switched to t-mobile home. >> internet and i. >> am loving it. >> don't sneak up on me like that what's up? >> carl nation? it's your number one broker with the best full service wealth management skills in the biz. >> actually. >> i'm seeing something from schwab. >> uh oh. >> yeah. >> schwab lets you invest and trade on your own. >> and if you want, they can even manage it for you. >> not to mention, schwab has a team of specialists for taxes, insurance and estate planning, all with low fees. >> we're experiencing technical difficulties. >> uh, carl. >> schwab. >> schwab. a modern approach to. >> wealth management. >> let the conclave begin. >> you are steering this conclave exactly where? i do not know. but that firm hand of yours has its admirers.

>> afi. hales, where's the film that endlessly entertains and is a stunning cinematic achievement? >> your ambition has. >> not gone unnoticed. >> conclave is nominated for eight academy awards, including best picture of the year. >> i have a responsibility to ensure that the decisions we make are the right ones. >> this year. have faith conclave rated pg. >> sheldon, we hear a wonderful pistachios. take your concerns about our no shells ads very seriously. >> uh huh. >> the what's. >> that? >> don't look away. >> is that how. >> people eat those? >> you two get in here. >> i'm going. >> in alone. >> we're standing up for our right to be lazy. >> by sitting. >> down and reclining back. >> because we work hard and want to relax harder. we, the lazy, are taking back lazy. >> on our la-z-boy furniture. >> la-z-boy. >> long live. >> the lazy. >> this is what joint pain looks like when you keep moving with a leave. just want to leave 12

hours of uninterrupted joint pain relief. aleve strength to last 12 hours. >> i wonder if this golf cart has hands free driving. >> whoa. >> whoa. >> it didn't. but my sketches slip into a completely hands free. i just step in and they're on. >> ontario, canada. stable and secure. when the world around us isn't. you can rely on us for energy to power your growing economy. and for critical minerals crucial to new technologies. we're here right by your side whoa! >> yes. >> how do you sleep at night. >> on a mattress. >> for a mattress firm? >> i sleep. >> i sleep. >> at the presidents. did y grocery outlet app gives you the opportunity to win groceries for life? imagine never paying for groceries again. well, what if i can't decide? avocados or tomatoes? why choose? at grocery outlet, you can afford both. and not just the basics. with grocery outlet,

you'll find all your favorite brands included. including gluten free pasta and my favorite cookies? um, huh, everything's included. so burgers and steaks for life?! you gotta win first. still worth it. now that's bargain bliss. ♪ grocery outlet bargain market just 4.99 a month. >> call one( 800) 355-8999 or visit homeserve. com. >> lockerbie premieres sunday at nine on cnn. >> looking there at the senate floor, members right now

debating robert f kennedy jr.. s nomination for hhs secretary. senator catherine cortez masto, democrat of nevada. speaking there earlier today, republicans managed to break a democratic filibuster on the pick. that vote this morning paves the way for a final vote tomorrow morning, which is expected to go kennedy's way. several key republicans who once were skeptical, most notably susan collins and bill cassidy, now say they will vote yes. turning now to news in what's already a blockbuster drug, according to a new study, the weight loss injection ozempic won't just help you lose extra pounds, it may also help curb cravings for alcohol and reduce drinking. researchers say the findings could possibly one day help millions of americans battling alcohol abuse. dr. sanjay gupta has more. so you worked on a documentary late last year about ozempic. at the time, were doctors curious about what else these medications could do? >> yeah. i mean, what was interesting is there was already. >> a lot of anecdotal. >> evidence coming out. >> they were seeing people obviously. initially controlling their blood sugars, diabetics, and obviously then losing a lot of weight, for which these drugs

really became known. but the idea that it could also curb other things, drinking, for example, that was anecdotal evidence. and it was interesting because they were already proposing mechanisms by how this might happen. you know, the idea that these drugs would be working on the brain to some extent, and actually an area of the brain there that's responsible for your feelings of reward, that you would do something and eat, for example, and not feel the same reward from the food. maybe that would curb your appetite, or at least be part of the reason that would curb your appetite. could the same thing be happening with drinking? so with that anecdotal evidence, this small study of just 48 people, they decided to put it to the test and and basically they had men and women in the study, and these were women who drank at least seven drinks, men who were drinking at least 14 drinks. they they had moderate alcohol use disorder called. and they basically gave half of that group a low dose of these semaglutide medications,

the ozempic like medications. and half the group got a placebo, and they basically followed them nine weeks later to see what would happen. and again, small study, but it was a pretty significant finding. you know, 40% sort of decrease in overall drinking. and you also had fewer drinks per day overall, fewer heavy drinking days. and and reduced alcohol cravings. and that may go back to this this reward mechanism. i think this reward mechanism is where a lot of the attention is going now. we know the drugs can have an impact on your gut. it can have an impact on your pancreas. but what these medications seem to do to the brain, i think, is where a lot of the research is headed. anderson. >> how big of a problem is alcohol abuse disorder in the u.s.? >> it's a big problem. you know, you have about 30 million people. this is ages 12 and up who have alcohol use disorder. and what is interesting, you have medications that do exist to treat alcohol use disorder, what used to be called

alcoholism. only about 2% of that. nearly 30 million people will actually use those those medications. so i think, you know, even though some medications exist, the idea that new therapies are necessary, i think, is also what's part of what's driving this research. >> and what about, i mean, is there more data to come from this study, like on smoking or. >> yeah. so they found and again, anecdotally they're observing all these things. they're seeing people curb their their interest and their appetites obviously. but then the drinking and also smoking of that group of 48 people, 13 of them were smokers. and again, this wasn't part of the study, but they actually were looking at were those habits being curbed as well. and they seem to be they seem to be. again, i want to emphasize these are small studies. they're going to need to be replicated. no one is saying that these are going to be medications that you're taking solely for alcohol use disorder, or solely for smoking, but again, there's a lot of enthusiasm around this.