he's not the enemy of corruption. he's the agent of corruption. very quickly, in the minute we have left this hour, our democrats, congressman, doing enough to challenge the trump administration on these various issues right now. no, nobody's doing enough. i mean, i'm working seven days a week now. uh, you know, i don't, uh, i don't know how much your working, uh, working now, but all of us can be doing at least a little bit more. uh, but we are involved in all of the cases that affect article one legislative power. we're defending the powers of congress. we're defending the civil service rights of our excellent public workers, like air traffic controllers and drug and food safety inspectors at fda and research and health scientists at nih who are keeping the public, health secure. we're out there in all of these cases, and we're speaking out very strongly against this attack on our form

of government. congressman jamie raskin, as usual, thanks very much for joining us. i'm wolf blitzer in the situation room. erin burnett outfront starts right now. >> outfront next, breaking news. the justice. >> department in turmoil tonight. now, six resignations of. >> top prosecutors, including the top. >> prosecutor in new york, resigning over the. doj decision. >> to drop the case against the. >> new. >> york city. >> mayor, eric adams. we're going to read this scathing letter. it's really incredible. hear the stunning allegations that are being made tonight. plus, musk meets modi, the richest man in the world, taking a sledgehammer to the federal government was their meeting with the leader of india about his businesses. and mitch mcconnell votes against rfk jr. for hhs secretary. that is his third vote against a trump nominee. trump is furious tonight and on the attack. let's go out front. >> and outfront. >> tonight, the breaking news upheaval in the justice department at this hour. there are six resignations that we are

aware of, of top prosecutors over trump ally and acting deputy attorney general emil bove order to drop the federal corruption case against the new york city mayor, eric adams. this includes the acting u.s. attorney for the southern district of new york, danielle sassoon just just sworn in, refused to drop the case, saying in her scathing eight page resignation letter. and it is scathing. but let me just quote these these operative lines. i cannot agree to seek a dismissal driven by improper considerations. i remain baffled by the rushed and superficial process by which this decision was reached. in seeming collaboration with adams counsel, and without my direct input. this is a prosecutor who had clerked for antonin scalia. a member of conservative judicial societies. this is the letter, and there are five other prosecutors that have also resigned from the doj because of this order to dismiss the adams case. sassoon, in her letter, accuses the trump justice department and mayor adams legal team of taking part in a quid

pro quo. and here's what she says happened. she says i attended a meeting on january 31st, 2025 with mr. beauvais adams, counsel and members of my office. adams attorneys repeatedly urged what amounted to a quid pro quo, indicating that adams would be in a position to assist with the department's enforcement priorities only if the indictment were dismissed. mr. beauvais admonished a member of my team who took notes during the meeting and directed the collection of the notes at the meeting's conclusion. i mean, that's pretty right there. and you're telling lawyers they can't take notes. that's what they do. and then taking them, seizing them soon doesn't stop there. when she's telling what happened, she reveals a stunning new allegation against mayor adams, writing, quote, we have a proposed superseding indictment, meaning one that's even bigger with more charges than the one already out there. that would add an obstruction conspiracy count based on evidence that adams destroyed and instructed others to destroy evidence and provide false information to the fbi, and that would add further

factual allegations regarding his participation in a fraudulent straw donor scheme. so then the acting attorney general, emil bove, responded to susan with sharp words of his own. i mean, and this is this is nasty. first, your resignation is accepted. you lost sight of the oath that you took when you started the department of justice. and goes on from emil bove. it's incredibly aggressive response there as well from him in this letter, his letter coming out at about eight pages as well. and then continuing as this goes back and forth, i want to emphasize that sassoon is a conservative prosecutor. she is known as that she was named by president trump to be the acting head of the s.d.n.y. last month. right. she was just sworn in. named by trump. she is a member of the conservative federalist society. she once clerked for the supreme court justice. as i mentioned, antonin scalia. this is not some diehard liberal trying to masquerade as an activist, as some in the trump administration may like to say. evan perez is

out front. so, evan, you know, this is a stunning letter and a stunning response by the doj to see things like this and these allegations that are laid out. what exactly stands out most here in this back and forth? >> yeah, this is an extraordinary set of letters. and really, it's a spiraling crisis. as you pointed out, erin, we now know of at least six people who have resigned their positions, and we're told of additional pending resignations that are possible because emil bove now wants to find someone, someone to put their name on a document to dismiss this case before a judge. and then that's, of course, assuming that a judge will even accept this motion at this point, given the fact of what has now transpired. one of the things that does stand out to me in all of this is that the argument from emil bove is centers around a couple of things, right? one of them is that eric adams is busy. he's the mayor of new york city. and

so how dare you bring a prosecution against the mayor of new york city? because, you know, he's a busy guy. and and that's really extraordinary because we've never heard that before. this is an argument, of course, beauvais made as part of the trump legal team, because president of the united states is a busy person, right? he's a person who runs the country. and so there is some constitutional protection, but we've never heard it applied by the justice department with regard to a mayor of new york city. and so one of the things in her response, sassoon says, adams has argued in substance, and mr. beauvais appears to concede that adams should receive leniency for the federal crimes solely because he occupies an important public position. it essentially means that you cannot pursue public corruption against a mayor or anybody else because they have an important job. that's an incredible thing to have the justice department decide. and, you know, in addition to, uh, to the sassoon resignation, we also know that

beauvais went to the justice department headquarters at the public integrity division and wanted them to sign it, and they refused. so kevin driscoll, who is the top career lawyer in the criminal division overseeing this issue, he resigned. and then john keller also tendered his resignation because he runs the public integrity section. so, erin, at this hour, we don't know who is going to end up signing this letter. by the way, one of the interesting things about this is that beauvais, from our understanding, is perfectly capable to sign this dismissal himself and submit it to the court. and, you know, then we'll see where it goes from there. >> wow. all right, evan, thank you very much. and everyone's here with me now. people who work in the southern district of new york know this. ryan, can we just take a step back? and, i mean, have you ever seen anything like this? these dueling letters, this, you know, excruciating detail from from danielle sassoon with incredible, you know, a conservative resume saying, no way. i'm not doing it.

>> nothing like it. except for the midnight massacre with nixon, in which he had to go through multiple people to try to fire the special counsel. >> so there's some echoes. >> of the worst chapter in american. history in recent american history., with respect to the. justice department. and it's incredible. it's here in writing, and i'm sure. >> that federal. judges across. >> the country are reading these letters and are. >> deeply disturbed. >> about what's happening at the highest levels of the justice department, because it seems so corrupt. >> i mean, it seems that way. harry, i want to get into the details of what is being said here. right. so you're basically she's saying i have a black and white case. i stand by it. yeah. you emil bove and the doj have not told me that there's anything wrong with my case. you're not disputing any of the facts. you're saying you want me to get rid of it? i'm not going to do that because it's the wrong thing to do. and that i mean that. and saying the notes getting taken away. >> yeah. >> it's a. >> it's a it's. >> an amazing. >> letter and. >> it's a letter that actually. >> in. my mind., summons. >> back to. >> the first part of. >> being an. >> assistant u.s.

>> attorney is interviewing for the job. >> and in that interview. >> process. >> you are asked. >> specific ethical, hypothetical. questions about. >> something that the u.s. attorney talked. >> about. >> the. >> duty of candor, being. honest with the court. >> and she. >> said. >> i can't go. >> into the court. >> and tell judge ho, excuse. >> me, tell. judge ho. >> the things. >> that you would like me to tell him. that would. >> be unethical. >> it would. >> be inconsistent. >> with my obligations. >> as a prosecutor. >> and so. >> that is your first test. even before you start work, to. pass that test. >> of being. >> an. >> ethical prosecutor who. >> will not lie to the court. and she's going. >> back and invoking that. obligation in this letter. >> it's i. >> think., her the. u.s. attorney's. >> office staff, although they must be in a state. >> of shock. >> i think they all applaud. >> the integrity. >> and courage that she showed. >> to stand behind. >> this case and. not fall for what. >> was being pushed. >> on her. >> lulu, this is not how emil bove doj trump. anyone expected this to go, right? they expected that this would be dismissed.

maybe. maybe there would be a little bit of kerfuffle, but it would be dismissed. and and then, you know, i mean, brad homan, who is running border, obviously met with eric adams today and said, i want more enforcement. all those other parts of it were playing out today, and now this whole thing has it is unexpected for them. >> it's unexpected. >> i mean, obviously. they had put her in that position and. >> she. >> is a conservative, as you mentioned, a staunch conservative. and so they thought they had someone who was going to fulfill what they wanted. but the wider context here is why is this happening? what is the purpose of this? and what we have seen is a department of justice that is being weaponized to reward people that will do what donald trump wants, in this case, enforcement in new york city, and to punish people that don't do what donald trump wants. and that is incredibly dangerous, because, of course, that is not the way the system has worked in this country. the way the system works in this country is that if you commit a crime, there is a legal process or you are

suspected of committing a crime, there is a legal process that unfolds. and so what these what is being stood for here is really the the rule of law in the united states. >> so, ryan, what happens here? and it's important, as harry was saying, you know, as evan was reporting. i'm sorry, um, beauvais could sign the letter himself and give it to the judge, and maybe he'll do that. i mean, how does this play out? do you think somebody is going to actually sign this at this point that that will, you know, be the person in the nixon who signs it? or does beauvais do it himself? and then does the judge take it? i mean, could this escalate? >> i think it can easily escalate. and the person who walks in signing it maybe risks their bar license because it's that unethical. what's happening here and in in her letter, in fact forecasts what's going to happen next. she says there are instances in which courts have rejected the dismissal of. >> the. >> case, and she gives examples of bribery as one of the examples. she's kind of saying this is bribery. she also says it's a quid pro quo. it's a definite quid pro quo between as far as she's saying it, between

adams and beauvais, that he, adams will go in the direction they want him to go in immigration in order to drop the case. that's the quid pro quo. the judge knows that. now, the judge will know that from his letter and the rest of it, and even beauvais's own letter first said it, and then the judge will have a hearing in all likelihood. so there's going to be a hearing. there's also this other mechanism that a judge could do besides sanctioning people, which is actually a point that we're in prosecutors. it's gone to the supreme court before the supreme court didn't take the case, and there were two judges that dissented. but that's a possibility as well, where the judge says judge hurst says, i'm going to actually appoint different prosecutors to continue the case because i can't trust this. >> i mean, harry, the one thing about this, whatever, you know, again, sometimes i take a step back, obviously not being a lawyer, it is pretty clear that if a doj of a president comes in and says, dismiss all this stuff against adams. and by the way, there's all these things we need, you need done, we're not putting them in the same sentence, but and then meets with them. i mean, it's pretty obvious what this is to anybody. if you presented it and took all the names out, everybody would

say, you took this case away. so this person would do what you wanted them to do. is that meet a legal standard of that? >> it does. >> it absolutely does. >> and. >> and. >> i think the. the back and forth on the subject of the oath is really telling, because of course, you do take an oath as an assistant u.s. attorney, but the oath is not to the president or to the attorney. >> general saying that she's violating her oath. >> yeah, the oath is to the constitution and to the ethical rules of practice and to the rules of the department of justice, which very clearly say you may not consider political things when deciding whether to charge a case. you look at the evidence, you look at the equities. you might consider fairness, but you certainly would not say, well, this person might do something that's helpful to the executive branch. let's not charge them. and there's also this interesting back and forth about the release of a russian arms dealer. and may it be time to go into it. but the u.s. attorney totally wins that debate. uh, what happened? there was a quid pro quo. and beauvais, of course, denies that it's a quid pro quo.

but the release of a russian arms dealer provides no support for what the executive branch is trying to do to the u.s. attorney's office. >> so. so, lulu, the new york times is reporting now, um, that that adams and the trump administration borders are, as i mentioned, tom homan they're going to hold a joint interview on friday on fox and friends and joint. right. i mean, that is that is obviously a statement in and of itself, right? that homan and adams are going to be together when it comes to obviously, immigration enforcement in the biggest city in america, which has been the heart of all of this. >> i mean, we should first say that mayor adams was a pretty vocal critic of former president biden's immigration policies. uh, immigration was something that really hurt the city of new york. there was a massive influx. so that is also a context within which this sits, which is this doesn't come out of nowhere. but ultimately, you know, this is the mayor of the biggest city in the united

states who is under indictment. and somehow what we are seeing here is that these the suggestion is that these that the case should be dismissed against him. and suddenly he's on fox and friends, uh, talking about immigration enforcement. i mean, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to put two and two together. and so i think at this point, it's incredibly suspect. and it really just calls into question what this doj is going to be doing going forward. and also what position this leaves mayor adams in, because frankly, there's a lot of questions right now about his political viability, if indeed this goes through. >> yeah, i mean, this is going to be an absolutely incredible thing to see. and with everything else going on in the daily swarm of of this administration, as you know, to cover it, this is this is something that makes you pause. thank you all three very much. i appreciate it. and outfront next, elon musk's high profile meeting today, sitting down with india's prime minister. trump says he's not really sure what

they talked about. plus, breaking news 14 states filing a new lawsuit against musk and doge, one of the attorneys general leading that suit, will be here to tell us about it. explain why, she says, and believe she can make the case that elon musk's actions are illegal. also, breaking trump, taking putin's side, blaming the war in ukraine on biden. >> i believe that's the reason the war started, because biden went out and said that they could join nato. >> have i got news for you is back for another season. that's right. more games. >> oh, i know. >> this final answer. >> points. more guests. >> how do. >> you. >> know everything? >> i'm smarter than you. >> more mayhem. >> she goes to diddy party. >> roy wood jr. amber ruffin and michael ian black are finding the funny in the week's biggest stories. >> to give you. >> all four. >> years of something to talk about.

>> if we alive. >> have i got news for you returns saturday at nine on cnn and stream next day on max. >> hey. >> spark fun. >> boat. >> a. >> crowd with plaque, psoriasis. even the thought of an itchy situation can throw you off your game. >> hey. >> mom. otezla is the number one prescribed pill to treat plaque psoriasis. from otezla can help you get clearer skin and reduce itching and flaking. >> it's a bird. >> it's a plane. >> doctors have been prescribing otezla for over a decade. don't use otezla if you're allergic to it. get medical help right away. if you have trouble breathing or swallowing. swelling of the face, lips, tongue, throat, or arms. severe diarrhea, nausea or vomiting, depression, suicidal thoughts, or weight loss can happen. tell your doctor if any of these occur and if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts. >> baby. >> what? >> go football. >> yes, yes. >> with less itchy redness. game night is a great night. live in the moment. ask your doctor about otezla and scan to hear how it works for a pro football

player. >> tap into etsy for home and style finds like custom shelving for less than $50 to make more space. or linen robes under 75 to get you cozy for affordable pieces to help you welcome big changes. etsy has it. >> liberty. >> liberty mutual. >> is all she. >> talks about since we saved hundreds by bundling our. >> home and auto insurance. >> hey, kid. >> it's pronounced liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty. >> now she's. >> mocking me. very mature. >> hey! that's enough. >> you two. >> hey. >> i'm. >> not the one acting. >> like a total baby. >> she's too. >> only pay for what you need. >> liberty, liberty, liberty. >> liberty. >> eczema. it's not always obvious. >> eczema isn't. >> always red. >> but now, eczema isn't. >> always going to stop.

>> you with endless. i'm searching for reckless is a once monthly treatment. >> to help. >> those with moderate to severe eczema find real itch, relief and real results like skin that's still. >> more clear. >> at one year. >> don't use if you're allergic. >> to apples. >> allergic reactions. >> can occur that can be severe. eye problems can occur. >> tell your doctor. >> if you have new or worsening eye problems. you should not receive. >> a live vaccine. >> when treated. >> with. eagles. >> before starting. >> tell your doctor if you have a. >> parasitic infection. >> skin that's still. >> more clear. >> even at one year. >> c dude, i really need a new phone.

check out my new samsung galaxy s25 ultra. it's got galaxy ai. imagine this thing running on our superfast xfinity mobile network. and i also heard that it can do multiple things with a single command. —with google gemini. let me try it. add recipes with overripe bananas to my “dessert ideas” note. that's what you chose to ask it? i had other things planned. ask how to get up to one thousand dollars off the new samsung galaxy s25 ultra with xfinity mobile. >> call one( 800) 269-9522. that's one( 800) 269-9522. >> anderson cooper 360. tonight at eight on cnn. >> all right, the breaking news. musk meets modi today. for musk, it was a family affair. the

billionaire brought along three of his kids this time, along with a tech executive who is the mother of two of them. the reason is a meeting at the white house with india's prime minister narendra modi. >> elon musk met with prime minister modi earlier today. did he do so as an american ceo, or did he do so as a representative of the u.s. government? >> uh. >> are you talking about me? >> no. elon musk. >> elon i don't know. they met, and i assume he wants to do business in india. i would imagine he met, possibly because, you know, he's running a company. >> no. >> okay. here's the thing about what trump just said. he said he said it. he said i assume he wants to do business in india. he is a ceo of a company. um. that's it. he said it. this is a country, of course, where musk has reportedly been debating a 2 to $3 billion tesla factory. he's been frustrated with some starlink issues there. he's been trying to get modi to move on, that he's been trying to get

them to get rid of tariffs on teslas so that you can import evs, too. there's growing speculation about spacex joining forces with the indian space research organization. it's a huge market for musk, and there have been challenges there. so, you know, to get the one on one with modi because you're the right hand man to the president of the united states, it matters. and it doesn't end there. last night, musk was the main event during a world government summit in dubai. musk appearing on the big screen to announce a new underground tunnel system there. who is building that tunnel system? musk. musk is building it. his boring company is winning that contract. and musk is both building his business empire and using this unprecedented power at the top of the american government to weigh in on government and foreign policy around the world. i mean, here's just a brief example of what he said about the war in ukraine. >> there is no way in hell. >> that putin is going. >> to lose. >> if he were to back off, he would be assassinated. >> there's a lot more where that came from. on his post and

other conversations. and this weighing in on foreign policy is something that world leaders are noticing. >> what is. >> new is that he is. >> intervening in favor of right. >> wing politicians all over europe. >> and this is really. >> disgusting. >> that's chancellor germany. everyone is here with me now. so. so, paul, let me just start with you, paul begala. so today you have that image of musk meeting with indian prime minister modi. and obviously, you know, you've got his parts of his family there. so there's that sort of incongruous thing in a meeting like this. um, do you take issue, paul, with musk having a meeting like this with modi and other world leaders as he is doing his doge business, and obviously all of his other businesses? >> oh, it's it's. >> open conflict of interest. >> president trump, god bless him. >> sometimes he. >> says the quiet part out loud.

uh. >> musk is not merely. >> a ceo. >> he is also an. >> sg. >> a special government employee. >> that means. >> even though he's not paid by the government, he is. >> obligated to abide by the ethics laws of the government. >> it means he works for you and me and for my mom. and so he's prohibited from using that governmental power to advance his business interests. we don't know if he's. >> doing it, though, because. >> he won't. >> release his financial disclosure. >> which should be made. >> public. >> if you ask me. he's certainly. >> not going. >> to release the transcript of the meeting that he had there. >> so this is just rife with this is. >> government of the billionaires, by the billionaires. >> and for the billionaires. mr. musk. >> gets richer. >> and by the way, he's trying. >> to cut farmers and. >> teachers and. >> special needs kids. >> so this. >> is. >> i guess. >> apparently. >> what president trump wants. he seemed very. >> satisfied with it, even. >> though he. >> admitted he did. >> he did. he did say the quiet part out loud. i mean, there wasn't any confusion there by trump. sure. michael, can i just ask you, though, because here's the thing. it's not that musk

needs to say a single thing to to modi about i want this or do that. he's in the white house, he's in the oval office. he is the right hand of the president of the united states. he doesn't need to say a single thing to get benefits for his business. >> i mean, look, it makes. >> perfect sense. >> musk has argued. >> for quite some. >> time now that he wants to break entry into india with starlink, and india is also interested. >> in partnering. >> with musk because of. >> the. >> falcon nine rocket technology, as they're interested in expanding their own space exploration program. so look, it. >> makes perfect sense in the world. the guy happens to be. >> one of the most innovative thinkers, i would argue, of our century. >> and he's an american. >> so why not have. >> an american. >> ceo and business leader going around the world, having partnerships with various sectors and other countries that we do consider to be adversaries and helping them build up various programs that could be. beneficial to the u.s. long term. i think it's a good thing. >> uh, paul, i mean, is it a good thing? i mean, you know, there is, of course, the fact that he was chosen. i mean, there's nothing obviously, um, democratic about his selection, but shermichael is correct. he is there. he is a innovative

person who is incredibly successful. >> you can't wear. >> two hats at once. >> i mean, you know. >> why don't. >> we make. >> nick sirianni the coach of the philadelphia. >> eagles. >> also. >> the referee of. >> the super. >> bowl, because. >> that would. >> be a conflict of interest, because you can't be a. >> good coach. >> for. the eagles and. >> a fair referee. >> mr. musk is a special. >> government employee, by the way. >> we have laws on this. we've had them. >> for decades. >> he's not. >> allowed to do that. who is. >> supposed to blow the whistle? >> this office called the. >> office of government. >> ethics, which is the ethics czar, the ethics cop in the white house. mr. trump fired that ethics cop. uh, we don't know why. by the way, he also fired inspectors general from the pentagon, the state department, hud, all of the government. >> every ethics. >> cop. >> that you can find. in fact, you've already covered the. the u.s. acting u.s. attorney in the southern. district of new york. every ethics cop you can find. >> it's like. >> and by the way, mr. trump himself. is a convicted felon convicted of fraud. so it's like, what if you made a bank robber president and then he

fired all the bank guards? maybe they wouldn't rob the bank, but golly, i'd be. >> really. >> really worried. >> aaron. >> aaron, i. >> remember once upon. >> a time, you know, paul, my democratic friends would always say when we would have these discussions on air, but we can chew gum and walk at the same time. i remember that quite frequently. elon musk and modi just announced today that india is interested in having some partnerships with the u.s. in terms of artificial intelligence. elon musk, again, another innovator in that sector. why not have one of the most successful individuals in the world who happens to be an american, are part of those discussions? paul, i think it just makes sense in terms of u.s. interest. >> i want, i want, i want to ask you something specific about this, but i would just say there is a model out there just to put it out there. right. the treasury secretary is, um, worth a quarter billion dollars, and he filed 21 pages of, of documents. and he went through a confirmation process. and then he divested from all sorts of things. right. you can't be a ceo and be the treasury secretary. um, there are questions here. and, katie, it does beg the question with all the reporting that you've been doing at wired, how blurred is the line right now between musk?

you know, tesla ceo, spacex founder, boring company and musk sleeping on the floor in washington running doge. >> i can't. find the line. i mean, there is no line at this point. i mean, i think the president himself just. >> made that crystal. >> clear to everybody. i, i don't. know in what capacity. elon musk met with. >> india's prime minister today. >> neither does the president of. >> the united states. he said literally, i don't know what they talked about. i presume he wants to do business in india. no. >> i mean, i. >> think what. >> we are. >> seeing is, is. >> the beginning. >> of a series of. extremely high profile global conflicts of interest playing out for as long as elon musk is in the white house. >> and in terms of, you know, we hear he's only allowed to work as a special government employee. and ge is paul, i liked how you put it. he's only allowed to work 130 days. well, i mean, what's allowed anymore? who's going to. it's very. >> difficult to tell sort of where the accountability lies even with regards to that. i

don't. >> think. >> that we can sort of assume that that is in fact what will happen. >> so, paul, you know, trump was asked specifically then. so he said the quiet part out loud about india, right? we all know what the reality is. but he actually said it. then he was asked if musk is going to get new government contracts because he already has tens of billions of government contracts while he's working at doge. and trump said this. >> if there's no conflict, i guess, what difference does it make? but we won't let him do any of anything having to do with the conflict. >> are you personally checking to make sure there's no conflicts of interest that he answers to you? >> sure he does. first of all, he wouldn't do it. and second of all, we're not going to let him do anything with his conflict of interest. >> paul, even though, you know, i'm not trying to lay it on too thick, i'm just saying, you know, he didn't know what happened. he said in the meeting with modi today. so it's not as if he's necessarily i'm not saying they did a deal that that that would be ridiculous. but you get my point, right? you don't know if there's a conflict of interest unless

you're looking for one. is what he said good for you. >> no. >> no, we had past tense in ethics. cop who's supposed to be checking. it's really not president trump's job to check even the most important special government employee. honestly, i'm not a big trump fan. it's not his job to comb through mr. musk's financial disclosure and find the conflicts. and that's why we have an office of government ethics. why did mr. trump fire that guy? and by the way, according to reporting, i saw the chief of staff was then supposed to step up and take it. and mr. trump said no. the interim ethics czar is doug collins, the former georgia congressman who's now our va secretary. well, secretary collins has. 16.2 million veterans he's supposed to be caring for. he's got 450,000 employees, a multi-billion dollar budget. he doesn't have the bandwidth or the expertise or the time to police the. ethics either. so there's no good answer as to why this president trump would fire the top ethics cops and then let mr., uh, mr. musk, who's replete with potential conflicts of interest, run wild.

>> and with ig's ethics gone, i mean, k the people looking at this are people like you, right? so you're looking at how is all this operating? you've looked at the new doge website. >> we. >> have. and that that is really fast. this is a website. they say go to our website. it's all there. >> so while we're talking about conflicts of interest. exactly. so we took a good look@doge.gov, which is the new website for musk's so-called department of government efficiency. the website itself is essentially a long feed of posts from the doge x account x, of course. being owned by elon musk. not only that, we looked at the source code for the page, and we found that it actually directs search engines to prioritize x, meaning if someone searches for something about doge, the search engine is being told to prioritize linking that person to x as opposed to doge.gov. essentially, they are doing everything they can to push users to elon musk's. >> platform. >> which is a for profit business. advertising based in terms of revenue, they are

directing users there as opposed to directing them to the government's own website. >> which, by the way, i'm just looking at the mobile site. it says official website, united states government. and then right below it, the big white bar is a follow on x. um, just just to give you a chance here to say one more thing, though, this is also when you go to x, x obviously does have many political points of view. sure it does, but it has a very strong maga faction there as well. and if they're directing people in there into the doge world. they would essentially be the possibility that you're going to hear more of that echo chamber, funneling. >> them into that. >> ecosystem than just what a government website and. >> an ecosystem where elon musk's posts are boosted, which we know is something that he has done on the platform as well. >> yes, absolutely. all right. well, thank you all very much, i appreciate it. and next, breaking news, 14 states tonight suing musk and doge calling what they're doing to the federal government unconstitutional. one of the leading this suit is my guest. and a showdown tonight between mcconnell and trump. the

senator, the lone republican vote against rfk jr.. tonight, trump hitting back in a personal way. >> the boeing 747 has crashed in the lockerbie area. >> it was the largest act of terrorism on the united states before nine over 11. >> there are. >> a number. >> of anomalies. >> trying to find out the why. >> of it. >> became everything. >> you could look at the iranians, the libyans. >> the. >> cia. >> hezbollah. >> nothing is what it seems. >> in the. >> lockerbie story. >> lockerbie, the bombing of pan. >> am flight. >> 103 premieres sunday at nine on cnn. >> touch can mean so. many things, even. >> for children. >> with moderate. >> to severe eczema. touch can stir a sense. >> of wonder. >> can make a. >> ride go smoothly and make a smile, stretch ear to ear. dupixent can help your child. >> stay ahead of.

>> eczema with clear skin. >> and. >> noticeably less itch. >> when a touch is all. >> in. >> good fun. dupixent helps. >> block a. >> key source of inflammation inside the body. >> that can cause eczema. to help. >> heal your child's skin from within. >> severe allergic reactions can occur. get help right away for face. >> mouth, tongue or throat swelling, wheezing, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor of new or worsening eye problems like eye pain, vision changes. >> or blurred. >> vision, joint aches and pains, or a parasitic infection. don't change or stop asthma or other medicines without talking to your doctor. dupixent the number one prescribed biologic by dermatologists and allergists. help your child feel the heal and see the difference. reach out to your child's eczema specialist today. >> mom. >> hey. >> sometimes you. >> just need a moment. self-care has never been this easy. >> gummy vitamins. >> from nature made the number one pharmacist recommended vitamin and supplement brand. >> in our. interconnected world, countries can. only keep

themselves safe if they. >> work with each. >> other. >> if we just. >> try. >> and treat things medically, we're going to. >> fail. >> we believe. >> that. >> all 8 billion of us, if we do this test once a year, we will turn cancer into an early stage disease. >> my eyes, they're dry. >> uncomfortable looking for. >> extra hydration. >> now there's blink neutral tears. >> it works differently. >> than drops. >> blink neutral tears. >> is a. >> once daily. >> supplement clinically. proven to hydrate from within. >> helping your eyes produce. >> more of. >> their own tears to. >> promote lasting. continuous relief. >> you'll feel day. >> after day. try blink. >> neutral tears. >> a different way to support. dry eyes. >> blink tears. >> at fisher investments. >> we may look.

>> like other money managers. >> but we're different. >> how so? >> we're a. >> fiduciary, obligated to act in our client's best interests so we don't. >> sell any. >> commission based products. >> then how. >> do. >> you make money? we have. >> a simple management fee structured so we do better when our clients do better. >> your clients. really come. first then, huh? >> yes. >> we make them a top priority by getting to know their think u

will too. >> i can. feel the winds of change. >> breaking news. a group of 14 states tonight just filing a new lawsuit against doge, arguing that elon musk's ascent to power in the trump white house is unconstitutional. and their lawsuit says crucial line here. musk's seemingly limitless and unchecked power to strip the government of its workforce and eliminate entire departments with the stroke of a pen or click of a mouse, would have been shocking to those who won this country's independence. outfront now, the michigan

attorney general, dana nessel, one of the democratic leaders bringing this lawsuit against musk. and i really appreciate it. attorney general. so can you explain just simply why you think musk's role is illegal? >> well, it's a clear violation of the appointments. >> clause, right? >> you know, the. >> united states constitution, it grants the president of the united states the ability. >> with advice. >> and consent of the senate, to appoint cabinet secretaries and directors over particular agencies. but elon musk in doge, which falls within the branch of the office of management and budget, um, he doesn't have the power to be marauding through all of these various different departments and agencies of government. he was never, you know, confirmed by the senate. uh, he's got no security

clearance. he didn't do a financial disclosure report. they haven't vetted him for conflicts of interest. all the things that would be traditionally done, they haven't done. he doesn't have the power to do this. and even one department, let alone the 18 or 19 or 20 departments that he has now visited, mined all the data, gotten everybody's personal information, state secrets, and god knows what he's doing with it all. it's illegal. it's unconstitutional. and we're asking the court of law for it to end immediately. >> so the white house has said, as you know, they've classified him as a special government employee. so, as you know, attorney general, that means he doesn't get paid. he's only allowed to work 130 days or fewer in a year. although obviously, you know, he's been posting pictures of himself sleeping on the floor and he would exceed that count. the way he's going pretty quickly. but the reality of it is, when it comes to that designation, a special government employee. all presidents have had them, democrat and republican. it's a bipartisan thing. do do you do you think that legally this is

different? >> it's very different. we've never had a special employee of the president behave as basically a super cabinet secretary who has authority over every single agency in federal government. we've never seen that before. and it's not illegal. and again, even if he did this in one department without the advice and consent of the senate, it would be illegal. but he's doing it in all the departments. >> so speaking of all the departments, he says he wants to cut a lot more than he already has. right. many, many. okay, so we've got u.s. aid. and, you know, technically, i know going through a 90 day review. uh, but but that's gone. and there's going to be more here's what he said. >> if you. don't get rid of the roots of the weed, then it's easy for the weed to grow back. but if you remove the roots of the weed, it doesn't stop weeds from ever growing back. but it makes it harder. so. so we have to really delete entire agencies. many of them. >> delete entire agencies. and

attorney general, the reason that i mentioned usaid is, you know, speaking to someone today who's who's involved with that, you know, the feeling is that 90 day reprieve. it doesn't mean anything. it's going to be gone anyway. the name has been ripped off the wall. people have been sent home. and it just begs the question of whether you think that what's already in motion here can be stopped. >> well, a court can stop it and a court can stop it right away. i mean, first of all, no, no cabinet secretary or director has the ability to just wholesale eliminate a congressionally created agency. um, it was created through an act of congress. it can only be eliminated through an act of congress. and he has never been elected to congress, let alone anything at all. right. he is an unelected billionaire who is acting really like a king. so what i would say is, you know, we're hopeful that a that a court in the district of columbia will recognize, you know, the grave threat that he

poses to our government. and we're we're asking the court to immediately, um, you know, restrain elon musk from these activities and to make sure that he discontinues, um. ordering, uh, employees to do all of the many things that we know he's been doing. right. firing workers, canceling government contracts, selling government property, and again, eliminating wholesale. uh, you know, departments of government, um, to to tell us to tell the court exactly what actions he's taken and to make sure that he is returning or deleting all of the sensitive data that he has now collected, um, which, you know, again, could put us in incredible jeopardy globally. um, you know, we heard that he's been meeting routinely with vladimir putin, and he's going into the department of defense, and he's mining data there. i mean, this is an incredibly serious moment in

american history. >> all right. well, attorney general dana nessel, thank you very much. i appreciate it. >> thanks for having me. >> all right. and next, the breaking news. trump backs putin president blaming the u.s. for the war in ukraine and refusing to say if russia will have to give back the land it seized from ukraine. plus, mitch mcconnell breaking with trump and very consistently now voting no on rfk jr., the only republican to do so. and trump is hitting back. >> votes against almost everything. now he's a, you know, very bitter guy. >> cookbooks. >> corporate fat cats, swindling socialites, doped up cyclists. then yes, more crooked politicians. i have a feeling we won't be running out of those anytime soon. >> a new season of the united states of scandal with jake tapper. march 9th on cnn. >> i'm getting. >> vaccinated with. >> pfizer pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine. >> so am. >> i.

>> because i'm at risk for pneumococcal pneumonia. >> i'm getting prevnar. 20 because pneumococcal pneumonia could put me in the hospital, and my risk is six times greater because i'm over 50. >> the cdc just. >> expanded its. >> recommendation for those 50 or older to get vaccinated. you're also at risk if you're 19 or older with certain chronic conditions. prevnar 20 is proven to help protect against both pneumococcal pneumonia and invasive pneumococcal disease in just one dose. don't get prevnar 20 if you have a severe allergy to its ingredients. a weakened immune system may lower your response. common side effects include injection site pain and swelling, fatigue, headache, muscle and joint pain. millions have chosen prevnar vaccines, which have helped protect adults for over a decade and have an established safety profile. >> that's why i. >> chose prevnar. >> i want to be. >> able to keep my plans. >> ask your doctor or pharmacist about prevnar 20. >> okay everyone, our mission is to provide complete, balanced nutrition for strength and energy. >> to ensure. >> with 27.

>> vitamins and minerals. >> nutrients for immune. >> health and. >> ensure complete. >> with 30g of. >> protein. >> got one. >> more antoine with. >> usps ground advantage. just like you're with us every step. >> of the way. >> cool. >> right on time. >> stay in the know from your dock. >> to their. >> door. >> love. >> love will keep. >> us together. >> now for something you can both agree on a sleep number. smart bed is perfect for couples. the climate 360 smart bed is the only bed that cools and warms on each side, and all our smart beds adjust the firmness for each of you. let's agree to agree on better sleep. and now save 50% on the new

sleep number. limited edition smart bed plus free home delivery and 0% interest for 48 months. shop now. >> no, i don't want to look. >> erica. >> use car shopping. >> doesn't have to be scary. >> i don't want to overpay. >> sure, nearly half of all. >> used cars have. >> been in an. >> accident. >> but that's. >> nothing to fear. >> show me car fox. >> knowing how a car's accident history impacts price means, you don't have to overpay. you can. >> look now. >> i am, i am looking. >> why are. >> you still covering. >> your eyes? >> i don't know. >> no fear. >> just fox say show me a carfax.com. yeah. you're still covering your eyes. >> i'm not. at morgan stanley. old school hard. work meets bold new thinking to help you see untapped possibilities and relentlessly work with you to make them real. >> if you. take or. >> have taken. >> humira for moderate. >> to severe crohn's disease or. ulcerative colitis and still have symptoms, you don't have to settle, ask. >> your.

>> gastroenterologist if switching. >> to rinvoq is. >> right. >> for you. it's one of the. >> latest treatments from the makers of humira. >> rinvoq works. >> differently than. humira and may help. >> rinvoq is a once daily pill that can deliver rapid symptom. >> relief, lasting. >> steroid free remission. >> and helps. >> visibly reduce damage. >> of. >> the. >> intestinal lining. >> rinvoq can lower ability. >> to fight infections before treatment, test. >> for tb and do. >> blood work. serious infections. >> blood clots some. >> fatal cancers. >> including lymphoma. and skin. serious allergic reactions, gi tears. >> death. >> heart attack and stroke occurred. >> cv event. >> risk increases in. >> age 50. >> plus with a heart disease. >> risk factor. tell your doctor. >> if you've had these events. infection hep b or c. >> smoked are pregnant or planning. >> don't take if allergic or have an infection. >> rapid symptom. >> relief and lasting. >> steroid free. >> remission are possible with rinvoq. ask your gastroenterologist if switching to rinvoq is right for you, you could pay as little. >> as $0 per month. >> i'm hanako montgomery in tokyo.

>> and this. >> is cnn. >> breaking news. president trump just moments ago sounding a lot like putin. >> now russia has taken over a pretty big chunk of territory, and they also have said from day one, long before president putin, they've said they cannot have ukraine be a nato. they said that very strongly. i actually think that that was the thing that caused the start of the war. and, uh, biden said it and zelenskyy said it. and i think that was one of the reasons, one of the starts of the war. >> um, of course, the war started because putin invaded ukraine. and, you know, you may remember the documents he handed out to all of his troops talking about how ukraine is part of russia. all of that was putin and his decision to start this war. i want to go straight to jeff zeleny at the white house. jeff, these comments that trump is making are the exact arguments that putin and his, you know, kremlin consistently

makes. >> aaron. >> there's no doubt about it. >> i mean. >> as we. >> stand here tonight with. >> that news conference in the. >> east room of the white house just a. >> short time ago. >> it was clear. >> that the president, president. trump once. again did not say the simple fact. >> that russia started the war. yet he does say there are going. >> to be negotiations to end the war. so that begs the question. >> how do those. >> negotiations proceed if there is no agreement. >> at least from. >> the u.s. >> and russia's point of. >> view. >> who started the war? but in any. >> case, there are going to be conversations. >> tomorrow in munich. >> but central to all of. >> this is. >> how the u.s. government. >> the trump administration, is. >> now viewing vladimir putin. and the. >> president was asked directly. >> tonight what. >> concessions would. russia have. to make to. >> go forward. >> here to end the war? and president trump. >> did not. >> have anything. >> specifically to. >> say on this. >> he launched. >> into how. >> the bush administration, the. >> obama administration, the. >> the biden administration. all presided over wars and ukraine

losing territory, but never once. >> saying that putin. >> caused this war. >> aaron. so as. >> these conversations go on. the relationship is reset. it's clear, at least at this point, which side the trump administration and indeed the president seems to favor. >> yes, certainly very clear at this point. jeff zeleny, thank you so much. it does come as the russians are celebrating what president trump is saying. fred pleitgen is out front with this report from moscow. >> the kremlin controlled. >> tv. jovial. >> even the anchor, surprised. >> by the concessions. >> president donald trump. >> offered russian. >> president vladimir putin. >> in their 90 minute. >> phone conversation. an extensive. >> talk about ending the. >> war in. >> ukraine. >> while seemingly sidelining ukraine's leader. >> nick lalota. >> not a word about zelenskyy, the host says. or rather, if there were words, they were only negative ones. ukraine will not get back its territories. ukraine will not join nato.

>> and i think they have to make peace. that's what i. >> think moscow more than willing to take up president trump's offer for immediate peace talks to end the three year war. russia saying it's already starting preparations for possible direct meetings between the u.s. president and the russian leader, the first time in four years the leaders of the u.s. and russia would meet face to face. the current administration, as far as we understand, holds the view that everything must be done to stop the war and for peace to prevail. the kremlin's press secretary says we are much more impressed by the position of the current administration, and we're open to dialog. dialog, apparently without kyiv at the table. ukraine's president, growing increasingly frustrated and concerned. >> all of this should say. >> it's important that everything does not go according to putin's plan. zelenskyy says he wants to do everything to make his negotiations bilateral.

but many ukrainians fear that's exactly what's happening. feeling president trump is selling them out. >> president putin wants to have peace now, and that's good. and he didn't want to have peace with biden. >> was that conversation. >> with putin? >> you tell me why that is okay. >> trump's plan is to rob ukraine as much as possible. this woman in kyiv says not to make peace here. it looks like ukraine is being betrayed. this woman says in what is being said now, i do not see anything good for ukraine. it's very sad. ukraine's army is steadily losing ground to the russians, mostly due to manpower and weapons shortages. russian forces already occupy more than 20% of the country territory. the new u.s. defense secretary bluntly says kyiv most probably won't get back, much to the dismay of america's close nato

partners and the ukrainians. >> there is no. betrayal there. >> there is a. recognition that the whole world. >> and the united states is invested and interested in peace. >> america's allies in shock moscow pleased russia's foreign minister, praising president trump. when i asked him at a press conference, are you more hopeful now that there can be real and fundamental change and improvement in u.s. russian relations? this is how you should communicate with russia, he says. perhaps that is why many in the west, including the leaders of the european union, were shocked when a simple, normal conversation took place between two polite, educated individuals. fred pleitgen, cnn, moscow. >> next, mitch mcconnell versus donald trump. the former leader alone. no republican vote against rfk jr.. >> i think i changed. >> my. mind about. >> these glasses.

>> yeah. >> it happens. that's why visionworks gives you 100 days to change your mind. >> it's simple. >> oh. >> anything else i can help you with? >> like what? >> visionworks. >> see the. >> look out, cause here i come. >> have you ever had. >> trouble with your weight? same. >> discover the power. >> of. >> wegovy with wegovy. i lost 35 pounds and some lost over 46 pounds. >> and i'm keeping the weight off. >> i'm reducing my risk. >> wegovy is the. >> only weight management medicine proven. >> to reduce risk. >> of. >> major cardiovascular. >> events such as death, heart attack or stroke in adults with known heart disease and obesity. >> don't use. >> wegovy with semaglutide or. >> glp one medicines. >> or. >> in children under 12. >> don't take. >> if. >> you or your family. >> had mtc men two. >> or if allergic. to it. >> tell your provider if you. >> plan to. >> have surgery or a procedure, are breastfeeding. >> are pregnant, or. >> plan to be. stop taking. >> and get. >> medical help right away. >> if you. >> get a lump or swelling in

your. >> neck, severe stomach. >> pain, or. >> any of these allergic. >> reactions. >> serious side. >> effects may include. >> pancreas inflammation. >> and. gallbladder problems. >> call your. >> prescriber if you. >> have any of these symptoms. wegovy may cause. >> low blood sugar in. >> people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to. >> treat diabetes. >> call your. >> prescriber about vision changes. >> if you feel your. >> heart racing. while at rest, or if you have mental. >> changes. >> depression or thoughts. >> of suicide may occur. >> common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, flu. >> or upset. >> headache, feeling. >> tired. >> dizzy, or bloated gas., and heartburn. >> some side effects lead. >> to dehydration. >> which may cause kidney problems. >> wegovy. >> i'm losing weight. >> i'm keeping it. >> off and i'm lowering my cv risk. >> ask your. >> prescriber about wegovy. >> that's the region. maybe we. >> can help each other out. >> undercover informant. >> the record. >> is. >> impressive. >> welcome to. the team. >> exactly how. >> much danger is this job? putting me in?

>> you got to get out of there. >> how much time do i have? >> i don't know me. >> how often do. >> you do this? >> every so. >> often. >> don't you. >> cry no more. >> liberty. liberty mutual is all she talks about. since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. >> it's pronounced liberty. >> liberty. >> liberty, liberty. nice try kid. only pay for what you need. >> liberty. liberty, liberty, liberty. >> we handcraft every stearns and foster using the finest materials like indulgent memory foam and ultra conforming inner springs for a beautiful mattress and indescribable comfort. save up to $800 on select adjustable mattress sets at stearns and foster.com. >> selling a. car is a. >> big deal. you've had some big moments, okay, and some wrong turns, but when you're ready to sell, cargurus is a big help. get multipleyou, call.

>> one( 800) 269-9522. that's one( 800) 269-9522. >> anderson cooper 360. next on.

>> cnn. >> tonight, trump takes on mitch mcconnell after mcconnell voted against rfk jr. to be the nation's health chief. mcconnell is a polio survivor, and he objected to kennedy in large part because of his well-documented vaccine vaccine skepticism. and trump is now hitting back. and it's personal, raising questions about whether mcconnell had polio. >> he's not voting against bobby. he's voting against me. but that's all right. he votes against almost everything. now. he's a, you know, very bitter guy. i don't know anything about. he had polio. he had polio. >> are you doubting that he had polio? >> i have no idea. if he had polio. >> um, of course he would have been aware of that. harry enten here to tell us something we don't know. so, harry mcconnell's vote, um, against kennedy. the third one? yeah. third one against a nominee in this term. pete hegseth and tulsi gabbard are the other two. this is a dramatic shift for mcconnell. >> yeah. >> i'll tell you. >> something you don't know,

which. >> is in the first time around, you know, how many nominees for cabinet trump voted against? zero. he voted against zero nominees. >> mcconnell. >> exactly right. zero nominees. versus the three. >> this time around. >> and of course, i think a lot of democrats are wondering that second number in your screen impeachment convictions. mcconnell had a chance to get rid of. >> donald trump. he didn't. >> do it when he. >> was the senate. >> majority leader. >> now that he doesn't really have much power beyond just the single vote. he is now all of a sudden turned against donald trump. i think. >> a lot of democrats. >> are saying a. >> little too much, a. >> little too late. >> so. so mcconnell railed against trump in the aftermath of january 6th. right. which is why that vote, you know, he could have gone the other way, and that impeachment vote would have changed the course of history, would have changed the course of history. that vote. and here's what he said after trump was acquitted in the second impeachment trial, he after he voted to acquit, said this. >> there's no question. >> none. >> that president trump is practically and. >> morally responsible for

provoking the events of the day. >> well, maybe now he's trying to make up for the fact that he didn't vote that way. he did not vote his conscience. but the 17 republicans who did, what happened to them? >> 12 went. >> adios. >> amigos, sayonara. >> the majority. >> of them. >> there. >> just five remaining still in congress. i think mitch mcconnell, you might make the argument. well, he wanted to stay in power. but you know what the bottom line is? he's going to be retiring anyway. and he last ran for reelection back in 2020. so he really had nothing to lose. >> so how will history remember him? >> i mean, look, we don't know how history will necessarily remember him, but his popularity right now. take a look at the net approval ratings. look at this. -39 points. >> i lined. >> up a slew of different politicians nationwide. mitch mcconnell is by far the least popular. and look at donald trump all the way on the other side of that ledger at plus three. donald trump, a lot more liked by the american public than mitch. >> mcconnell is. all right. harry enten, thank you