for you at arocho. >> sparks laura coates. >> live next on cnn. >> closed captioning brought to you by aarp. join and get instant access to member benefits. >> join aarp for $15 for one year with automatic renewal, and get instant access to member benefits and social programs. join and get a free gift, plus aarp, the magazine just in the social security administration is telling its employees, effective immediately, they can't access what they're calling general news websites from work issued devices. >> that's according to a new memo obtained by cnn. employees also can't access sports websites or online shopping, and any exceptions will have to be approved by the employees supervisor just in time for march madness. thank you all very much for watching news night laura coates liv starts right now.

use a scalpel after telling him to get more aggressive. and could derek chauvin be pardoned? conservative commentators latch on to the idea, including one of trump's most powerful advisers. all tonight on laura coates live in. all right, everyone, at this point, you are probably asking yourself this very question are we in a trade war with our neighbors, or are we not in a trade war with our neighbors? it seems like every even president trump, doesn't actually know what direction to take because he's hitting the pause button again, delaying most tariffs on mexico and canada for now a month. our allies, frankly, they're confused. businesses don't know what to do. and the markets well they're in the red. trump was asked about all of

this in the oval office. >> some of these exemptions that have been announced and some of these temporary delays, have you been influenced in those decisions because of the market reaction? >> well, there are no delays at all. no, nothing to do with the market. i'm not even looking at the market no delays. >> not quite. he outright delayed the tariffs on canada and mexico. you remember last month and in the past two days, he's put targeted pauses in place as far as not looking at the markets. well, it would be hard not to look at this. the dow is down big and today it didn't even rebound when the newest pause was announced. because at this point, wall street doesn't know what to make of it all. neither do the countries that are getting hit with those tariffs. so are we back to the take trump seriously? not literally. no, seriously debate once again, is it all a head fake or is it good negotiations? well, some strategy out of the art of the new deal. perhaps art of the deal. now for a deal to be made.

we all know that everyone involved needs to actually know what trump actually wants, and he seems to have been all over the place. is it stopping the flow of fentanyl into america? remember that he slammed canadian prime minister justin trudeau for not doing enough there, but canada accounted for 0.2% of fentanyl seizures at our borders in 2024. that's about 43 pounds. and as for mexico. well, president claudia sheinbaum brought out a prop today to show how the amount of fentanyl seized the southern border has dramatically fallen. she actually stood by this chart, citing figures from the united states government. she says trump didn't know about the drop until mexico sent him the data. now, could the plan be cracking down on illegal immigration? well, he has said so on the campaign trail, certainly. well, here's what commerce secretary howard lutnick says about all that today. >> okay, so the mexicans and the

canadians have done a nice job on the border, meaning you have illegal crossings at their lowest level ever. >> okay. what about moving manufacturing back to america? here's the problem. expecting companies to move production to the u.s. in a month is a pie in the sky pipe dream. we're talking about an undertaking of probably many months, maybe even longer, to do that. whatever trump is trying to accomplish in the short term or in the long term, all of the uncertainty is certainly causing more republicans to speak up. >> you remember the old saying, the danger of rising high is that the air gets thin. i'm worried about the tariffs. yeah, i'm not saying that tariffs are going to cause inflation. president trump did them in his first term and they didn't. i'm saying that we just don't know. we're in very obscure

territory. we're in uncharted waters. >> joining me now stacy schneider, opinion contributor at the u.s. news and world report. and also a former contestant on the apprentice. also, david cay johnston, the author of the making of donald trump, and rick newman, a senior columnist at yahoo finance. glad to have all of you here. david, let me begin with you, because president trump, as you know, is backing down on these tariffs. but he says there's nothing to do with the markets now looking at the markets. what do you think. and why does he negotiate like this. >> well i would argue donald doesn't really know what he's doing. he's appallingly ignorant. but what he's doing is accruing power to himself. he can grant exemptions and favors to this business or that industry, which we saw him do in his first term. and that simply enhances his power and his belief. you'll recall from his first term, i have an article two. i can do anything i want. it's not what the constitution

says, but that's what donald believes. he believes he has dictatorial authority. >> well, he's certainly talked about a mandate. but the other m word of the week has been the market, right? i mean, rick, businesses, they don't like turmoil. the market obviously has dropped more than i think, 1400 points in the last four days alone. and the tariffs could be back in a month. so this is all having an actual impact on our markets. but also is it undermining confidence in our markets more broadly? >> it is for the moment. i mean temporarily it is for sure. i mean that's why we're seeing this pullback. and one thing that one of the things that's happening among businesses is they are just putting off decisions about should they spend money, should they make plans to invest money. they're just putting that off because they need to know where are they going to invest the money? are they going to be punished if they invest it in one country or another. so that's why we're seeing this pullback. markets aren't just don't know how far trump is going to go with tariffs. and we're finally seeing the reality of that indecision right now. and trump

is contributing to the decision. i think the question for markets is what is trump's retreat threshold. how much damage does he have to cause before he actually pulls back. so we got a hint of that. today. markets are down about 4%. this week. they're down about 7% from the peak a few weeks ago. so that gives you some idea. that's the threshold where trump says, okay, i've done enough damage for now. i'm going to pull back a little. >> you know, stacy, i heard the word retreat just used. and i have to tell you that in the same sentence as that trump negotiation, i think is a little bit jarring for people. i mean, you've seen him in a boardroom. do you think he is indeed retreating, or is this somehow part of a strategy that we're missing a forest through the trees? >> no, i don't think we're missing the forest through the trees. it is a retreat, but it's a trump retreat. so donald trump has three negotiating styles. one is my way or the highway. the second one is take no prisoners, and the third one

is he it's the the third one is that he is not going to let anyone loose out of a deal. it's his terms only. and if you don't take those terms, he doesn't like it. but what's happening now is, despite his reply to that reporter who asked him if it's the markets that are causing him to back off the tariff situation, and he said, i'm not even looking at that. and the american people will be happy. this is a long term situation and it's going to work out really great for everybody. he is absolutely looking at the markets. business is his brand. it's always been his brand and it remains his brand in the white house. and donald trump wants to be the darling of wall street. he does not want to be the pariah of wall street. and these market drops are happening under his watch. and now he cannot blame joe biden for what's going on today, because this is the buck is stopping with donald trump.

so he is retreating from the policy and it's to save face. and it didn't help him that trudeau the prime minister of canada, just said a few days ago that these tariffs on canada and the other countries are a dumb idea. and the wall street journal said that as well. and donald trump is not used to having people who are in the echelons that he he plays in criticize him that way publicly. it's an embarrassment. so he's backing away. >> well, on that point, rick, i mean, one analysis found that the tariffs on canada, also mexico, also china, they could cost families up to $2,000 a year. people are already griping about and justifiably so about prices being so high. how will americans afford that? >> yeah, this is a this is a great point, americans, because of the inflation we've had for the last three years, they are

extremely sensitive to any price hikes right now. like people have just had it. they don't want to see the price of anything go up. they want to see prices come down. that's why trump won. trump didn't win because voters were like, hey, we want you to in elon musk to take a chainsaw to the government. they want he won because voters want lower, lower prices and lower inflation. so i do want to caution if all the trump tariffs go into effect, we're not going to have 10% inflation. you know, we might have inflation that goes from 3% to 3.8% or 4%. it's not going to be ruinous. and it on its own, it probably would not cause a recession. but this is the wrong time to be doing anything that raises prices. americans want prices to come down. trump has no answer on inflation. i mean, this is, you know, this is sitting out there like a goose egg, excuse the pun, but. >> it's chicken eggs right now. chicken eggs, not goose. i get your point, though. i hear you on that, david. you know, trump

told automakers there would be no more delays. he's vowing to go ahead with the reciprocal tariffs on april 2nd. but what if, to rick's larger point, what if the blowback is even worse? what then? >> i think he'll come up with another delay and an excuse. and his tariffs are very badly designed in many ways. one of them is there's a tariff on canadian energy. but he excluded wind and donald trump. absolutely detests electricity from wind turbines. but he didn't put a tariff on it. >> you know, forgive me for my non-economic background, but how does one tax the wind? don't answer. there's a whole different conversation. thank you everyone. we'll talk again. here to discuss the political fallout. we've got charlie dent, former pennsylvania republican congressman, and emily austin, a republican political commentator as well. glad to have you both. let me get with you, charlie, because the president's decision to suspend tariffs, many are

viewing this as a kind of admission that maybe he is looking at the markets, that maybe there was a little bit of getting ahead of his skis. do you see it that way as well? >> well, of course he's looking at the markets and what i think donald trump needs to understand is that what businesses like are certainty, predictability and stability. and this, this, this, this, this whiplash that we're all getting from these tariffs are unsettling. and frankly, and businesses are these are smart people. they know that these tariffs are going to harm american manufacturing because much of what is imported are inputs for things that we make. that's the hard reality. and american agriculture knows the challenge here to. farmers export so much product and they will be the objects of retaliation on corn and on pork. and other commodity soybeans, other commodities. they know that. so i can't understand the economics of this. trump went to the wharton business school. i mean, they want they probably want their diploma back. i mean,

because there's no way these tariffs are going to protect the privileged few at the expense of the many. and i can assure you it will be inflationary. prices will go up. but he put a 25% tariff on steel. well who uses steel. oh people who make cars and trucks and other users. prices will go up. steel prices will go up. they want to stop steel coming in from other countries. well, domestic producers will raise their prices. >> but emily, to this point, the white house and republican lawmakers, though they are messaging that people are willing to pay more because of the tariffs, they're willing to do so. listen to what they've had to say. >> as the american people ready to get the country back on track and do what it do, what it needs to do, what it takes to make that happen. absolutely. we're going to have to adjust some prices for it. >> access to cheap goods is not the asset, is not the essence of the american dream. >> there'll be a little disturbance, but we're okay with that. >> i mean, maybe that's the royal we of who's okay with it, but can you reconcile the idea of americans wanting lower

prices, having the economic interest that charlie talked about, and then this idea of the tariffs? >> yeah. i also want to remind the viewers and yourself that it was treasury secretary janet yellen that reaffirmed that tariffs don't, in fact, actually inflate the american economy in defense of tariffs that joe biden at the time wanted to put in place. and i also want to point out a few contradictory statements saying, well, trump is, you know, giving us whiplash on his tariff policies. but on the other hand, i view that as coming into something and not wanting to settle on an imperfect deal. so the reason, you know, they're calling it what? what is he walking back on it? i'll call it a suspension. in the meantime, a little bit of a delay because he, in fact, is doing this because he wants to protect the farmers and he wants to protect the auto manufacturing employees and give them some time. like you said, they can't do it in a month. you can't possibly make 350,000 american jobs in one month. so if you delay it, you have the possibility of bringing the work back to the states, which is exactly what he wants to implement. now you asked, well, is he not looking at the markets? i think he's made it quite clear that his goal is to

stop the fentanyl crisis. and i don't think you can put a price on one's life. >> no, i certainly understand the impact of fentanyl. i think the larger point is to your point. no one disputes that tariffs are technically going to go to the people who are importing, et cetera., but it's going to impact because the burden will be felt by the american consumer. so the question is why now? why do you think trump is doing the suspensions now, given the fact that he was very invested in having these tariffs and his campaigned on the idea of americans wanting lower taxes or lower prices, excuse me? >> well, he's scared. i mean, he sees he sees what's happening to the markets. i mean, he can read. i mean. >> her point is that he's not afraid. he's actually trying to salvage and help people. what's your take? >> well, let's let's start with the fentanyl issue. it's the chinese communist party that is the problem. they're the ones causing the fentanyl problem here. it's not the canadians. and these these tariffs are being imposed on canada in the name of national security. we've never had a better friend than ally. their cemetery in normandy, the canadians, is right down the road from ours.

if anybody needs to understand that better. but it just seems to me that the president is nervous because there will be inflationary impacts. and the auto sector in particular, we're talking price increases as much as $10,000 a car. that's not a de minimis impact. that's a real that's a real hit. and when you talk to these farmers, they know what's coming. they're going to lose market share. they're going to have to take this tariff revenue and use it to subsidize farmers. >> i talked to a soybean farmer last night. he's the head of an association. he had that similar notion, although he was very still very complimentary of the president and believing that that there was going to be good coming out of it. but what's your reaction to that if this is going to have this great burden on the american consumers, how do you reconcile that? if you're trump. >> you know, i will. i'll give it a point that trump is not looking at tomorrow's stock market, and he's looking more long term than short term. because overall, if you look at his tariffs over the next four years, you'll see more american created jobs. you'll see more money into our economy. i also want to point out, we discussed a bit in the green room about doge. you know, we have our disputes over it, but we are in

fact saving billions of dollars of waste and fraud and eliminating that which will put money back into the american people's hands. so you can give and take. there's the pros and cons, but ultimately it will level itself out. we can't think short term. we have to see the bigger picture here. >> but i would argue for every if you're trying to protect an industry, take steel. you you impose tariffs, you will end up costing more jobs for those who use for those who use steel, then you will save of of the steel makers. that's the reality. we see this all the time and the impacts are going to be very negative on the producers in our country, manufacturers and farmers. i mean, how many times we went through this in the 1930s, smoot-hawley exacerbated the great depression. and you know what? we ran trade surpluses in the 1930s. did anybody really notice when unemployment was at 20%? i mean, this is what we're dealing with in this country. and we we should not be returning to the 1930s or the 1890s tariff policy. it's a different world now. you know, america, we shouldn't be talking about tariffs and subsidies. that's what the chinese do. why

don't we talk about breaking down barriers, lowering tariffs, helping american producers sell overseas? we're 20% of global gdp. we're what, 5% of global population? we didn't do this by selling to each other. >> well, we'll see because part of the complaint has been about the absence of reciprocity in tariffs, the idea of fairness. and we'll see how the american people view it. is it a short term or a long term proposition? we are only i know. newsflash less than two months in, charlie. emily, thank you both so much. thank you. two weeks ago it was this. >> are. this is the chainsaw for. bureaucracy chainsaw. >> but now trump is telling his cabinet that musk isn't in charge of staffing. is there a break between the president and the first buddy? plus, a disabled veteran speaks out after getting cut from the va

department. >> upset stomach iberogast indigestion iberogast bloating iberogast thanks to a unique combination of herbs, iberogast helps relieve six digestive symptoms to help you feel better six digestive symptoms the power of nature. >> iberogast hourly amazon employees earn an average of over $22 per hour in communities across america. >> hey. >> we're going big tonight. >> let's go. >> amazon offers hourly employees health care on day one for the whole family safety should i call mom? >> no. don't tell your mother anything. >> i feel like new. sunglasses. like a brand new pair of jeans. i feel like taking chances. i

feel alive. brand new. oh. >> learn more about celebrity cruises latest offers. >> my loves. >> sometimes it takes a different approach to see the possibilities all around you. >> how are the girls? >> they're amazing. dad as a capella university nurse practitioner student, you'll learn the advanced skills you need to face the nursing challenges of today and tomorrow. >> a different future is closer than you think. with capella university. >> with the vision to see what's possible and the grit to make it happen, morgan stanley can help create the future. only you can see.

>> selling a car is a big deal. you've had some big moments, okay? and some wrong turns. but when you're ready to sell, cargurus is a big help. get multiple offers instantly so you choose the best deal. cargurus the number one most visited car shopping site. >> for more than a decade, has been trusted again and again and again. s. e. cupp. ask your doctor about fast liberty. >> liberty mutual is all she talks about. since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. >> it's pronounced liberty. liberty, liberty, liberty. nice try kid. only pay for what you need. >> liberty. liberty, liberty. >> liberty. >> to all those who never give a second thought to being the first ones in.

watch golf from the best seat in the house with xfinity. from the tee to the green, catch every pivotal moment of the players championship in crystal clear enhanced 4k. find tee times, tour your favorite holes and see live leaderboards and scorecards. and with xfinity multiview, never miss a moment. watch up to 4 live events at once. brought to you by comcast business, proud partner of the players. just say “the players championship” into your xfinity voice remote. $7. it's trying. friday plans.com once again, nine tablets for just $7. is tri

friday plans.com. >> twitter. breaking the bird premieres sunday at ten on cnn. >> well, tonight president trump wants his administration to exchange the chainsaw for a scalpel as elon musk and doge slash federal jobs. trump says cabinet secretaries are in charge, with a caveat. >> and i said, i want the cabinet members go first. keep all the people you want, everybody that you need. elon and the group are going to be watching them. and if they can cut, it's better. and if they don't cut, then elon will do the cutting. >> ooh. though the number of jobs last month that were lost is the highest since july of 2020. yes, during the pandemic, that's up 245% just since january. nearly 40% of those cuts came from the federal workforce, aka doge. now, some republicans are criticizing the

job cuts. alaska senator lisa murkowski calling them, quote, confusing and callous. with me now, molly ball, senior political correspondent for the wall street journal, and sarah fisher, a cnn media analyst and senior media reporter for axios. well, molly, i mean, he president trump is shifting responsibility for slashing jobs to the actual agency heads. but he then says, but if they don't do it, then musk will. so i'm not seeing the clear distinction between what the current policy is and before, but is this a recognition in some way that either there is a lot of fretting as to who is in control, or where the blame should actually be? >> i think, you know, everything that we hear from the white house is that the president himself is still very thrilled with the job that elon musk is doing. he loved being able to read out, you know, the silly line items in the speech to congress on tuesday night. he thinks that this is all going really well. but i think what we're hearing is some trickling up of complaints from others in

the administration, particularly, you know, these newly confirmed cabinet secretaries. you cannot get people more loyal to trump than the people he has put in his cabinet. and so they would like to be in charge of things. and we saw this, i think, for the first time with that first email that elon sent out. and then immediately some secretaries up to and including, you know, pete hegseth at the pentagon saying, actually, don't answer the email. i'm the one who's in charge of, you know, things like performance reviews and deciding who gets cut. so i think what i think the president's comments are more a reflection of the feedback that he's getting from others in the administration than any personal dissatisfaction that he feels because he still feels like this thing that elon is doing is directionally, on the whole, good and not making him look bad. and that's ultimately the metric for donald trump. >> you've got some new reporting as well as to what agency heads are actually saying about all this. what can you tell us? >> well, i think they're frustrated because when you're going in and you're doing these

huge unilateral cuts, you're going to have a lag in which american people are actually impacted, whether they're farmers or they're people who are going to receive benefits from the government. and those are constituents, people who are not just voting, you know, for their local politicians, but they also voted for donald trump in this election. but they didn't quite realize how they themselves were going to be impacted. and so i think one of the things that's bubbling up now to the administration is be careful if you overcut, because we all have approval ratings that we need to be mindful of. we need the buy in of the american people. and if we go and we just wipe people out, we're not going to get it. the other thing you're starting to see, laura, is that elon musk and doge are going and they're doing these big cuts. but then great reporting from the wall street journal, the new york times and other places is showing that these are not actually as effective in cutting money than they claim it to be. and so i think donald trump has a pr goal here. and on one hand, you want to tout the doge leaderboard and say, look how much we're cutting. but on the other hand, you don't want to cut so much that your agency

heads are at you and you start to lose momentum from the american people because they're being impacted in ways that they had not foreseen. it's a difficult balance, but it's a pr balance. can you prove you're trying to do something without overly doing it? >> well, speaking of that proof, i mean, there are a lot, a lot of lawsuits that have been demanding answers about who actually is running the show, because obviously, the special government employee, it's distinct in terms of you have the same conflicts of interest requirements and beyond, but is this the white house trying to seek some kind of political or maybe legal cover as well, by having there being many cooks in the kitchen? well. >> i don't know if there is a legal angle to this, but look, i think part of the reason that people have been forecasting that there's going to be some kind of split between trump and musk from the very beginning, but trump still very much believes that elon works for him. he's still very much sees elon's efforts as something that he approves of. >> and publicly, elon musk has reiterated that. >> that's right. and so i

think, you know, part of what he said today was a reflection of that saying he's basically an advisor. he suggests things, he gets to do things, but only because the president lets him do those things. and potentially the agency heads let him do those things as well. again, i think the only way there's going to be any kind of daylight between the two of them is if trump starts to think that elon is making him look bad, and that is not how he feels at the moment. >> i mean, serving at the pleasure of the president, but also the agencies are serving at the pleasure of that whom pleases trump, which is elon musk. >> well, one thing i'll say about doge doge is not a real thing. so we have agency. >> tell them. >> that there's like laws that dictate and govern how independent agencies should function and that they are getting certain budget. there is nothing like that that exists for doge. doge only exists to be able to guide president trump in whichever way president trump wants, but it's not something that any law dictates. agency heads have to adhere to. >> but it's very powerful,

though. if you're the person who's right beside the president, even if i don't really, truly exist, you are the most influential person. >> yes, he's advising, of course, but it's not like elon musk and doge itself is part of the infrastructure of the u.s. government. and so the. >> u.s. digital service. >> it is, but it's not doge itself is not an agency. it's not a department. it's a brand new thing that just got propped up. and so if you're somebody who's now leading an agency, you're a cabinet official, you're looking at elon musk and doge and you're saying, what authority do you really have? of course, president trump is blessing you. do you actually have the authority to unilaterally try to make cuts out of my department? i don't think so. and that's why things are going to court. that's why these cabinet officials are. if elon musk and doge had real, true authority, i don't think you would see as much butting of heads. but i don't think he has that kind of authority. >> the old you and what army question finally answered molly ball. sarah fisher, thank you so much. look, all those complaints you're hearing from agency heads are probably because people like my next guest are getting fired. a veteran who worked at the va helping other

veterans. he joins me next. plus, the former minneapolis police chief responds to right wing calls to pardon derek chauvin. >> an alternative to pills. voltaren is a clinically proven arthritis pain relief gel which penetrates deep to target the source of pain with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medicine directly at the source. voltaren the joy of movement. >> we always loved cooking, and we found a restaurant that let us get in with no business background. then one customer came along, put us on tiktok, and the next night there was about 300 cars in line. >> to be able to have 28 employees. and everybody's paid well. it just makes us feel so much more accomplished that we can take our team and have them grow with us. >> we wanted to build a legacy, and that's exactly what we're doing on tiktok. >> you want high performance tools, long lasting tools,

affordable tools. you want harbor freight tools. whatever you do, do it for less. at harbor freight, save even more at this weekend's parking lot sale. >> oh, don't forget dinner with my boss. >> huh? great. >> our new ultimate adhesive will save the day. new poligrip ultimate. all in one. give superhuman hold. food scene and comfort. >> if your mouth could talk, it would ask for. >> polly grip. >> some people just know they could save hundreds on car insurance by checking all state first. like you know to check your outfit first before meeting your girlfriend's family. >> that's a tough one to recover from. steve, the disappointment on our faces says it all. >> yeah. checking first is smart. yeah. so check all state first for a quote that could save you hundreds. you're in good hands with allstate. >> my moderate to severe crohn's disease. >> and my ulcerative colitis

symptoms kept me. >> out of the picture. now there's skyrizi. >> i've got places to go, and i'm feeling free. control of my symptoms means everything to me. control is everything to me. >> and now i'm back in. the picture. >> the most significant symptom relief at four weeks with skyrizi skyrizi has proven to help deliver remission. >> and help visibly improve damage of the intestinal lining. at 12 weeks and one year. >> don't use if allergic serious allergic reactions, increased infections, or lower ability to fight them may occur. before treatment, get checked for infections and tb. tell your doctor about any flu like symptoms or vaccines. liver problems leading to hospitalization may occur when treated for crohn's or uc. >> ready to get back in the picture? ask your gastroenterologist how to take control of your crohn's or use with skyrizi. >> control is everything to me. >> abbey could help you save. >> this is it. >> yeah, that looks safe.

totally safe. >> breathe. >> first timer. huh? let's pause for the facts. sure, it looks safe, but like nearly half of all used cars, it's been in an accident with carfax. com you see how accidents impact price so you don't have to overpay. unpause. >> one with no accidents. dan huot space. >> you're going to need it. >> wait. t

you. explore your treatment options and connect with the provider at prokopec. >> united states of scandal with jake tapper returns sunday at nine on cnn. >> this week, we've been highlighting the stories of veterans who have lost their jobs as a result of elon musk's doge cuts. a memo from earlier this week revealing the trump administration's plan to eliminate more than 70,000 employees from the department of veterans affairs. now, department that tasked with helping and supporting our nation's veterans is now in turmoil. joining me now is tony ruiz. he is a veteran and was recently fired from the va office in los angeles, where he

worked directly assisting other vets with their benefits, disabilities or even homelessness. tony, thank you for joining us this evening. can you tell me how you were notified you were going to be losing your job? and and what did that feel like to you? sure. >> and first of all, thank you for having me on the show. for all the veterans out there who want help. so in my. >> case, i got an email one day from my boss directing me to a calendar invite to meet with him and my director and somebody from doge in dc. and to answer your previous guests, there is a doge. and so i was told i was a failure. today is your last day at the va. yet, like most of my federal, federal employees and vets who are struggling and being punished, i was given an award by the va six months ago in l.a. as employee of the quarter. i was given a $1,000 bonus and i met josh jacobs, the va undersecretary. that tells you a lot that somebody in dc

picked me out not for being a poor performer, but for being a stand up performer. and many of us are suffering for this. and doge is very much real. and president musk is very much real. >> you know, just to hear about that there, certainly when you were told that you were being let go and to think back just six months ago, as you as you relayed to us just now, pretty stunning. and you say that you have felt targeted as a federal worker, but also as a latino. why? >> so we got some emails when the administration first came in about dei and turning in employees who were dei. so when i was terminated, i felt like, okay, they're firing a bunch of dei folks. i'm fired next for having a latino surname. the va picked me out again. the employee of the quarter. and i hope you share the picture of josh jacobs and i, who again highlights the fact that i was a

good employee. yet february 4th. i'm now no good to the va. i'm a fraud. i'm abuse and we don't want you anymore. it tells you a lot about something. when i have a master's degree in homeland security. and by the way, a veteran. so it makes no sense whatsoever. >> you actually reached out to republican congressman derrick van orden, who is a disabled veteran himself, about being fired. what did you say and how did he respond? >> sure. so i actually was trained by the va to watch congressional hearings, and i always see van orden yelling at people, yelling at the va. and i noticed that he always had some some presence. so i emailed him and said, hey, on linkedin, where's your response to the firings, congressman? no response. and one day before i went to dc this week he sends me a message on linkedin threatening to fire me and to report me to either elon musk or doge. yet i was already fired. so congressman van orden a bit

too late there, but. >> threatening to fire you. why did he say why? according to you? >> he said i was working. he said i was working at 1346. instead of talking smack about donald trump. but he didn't realize if he looked at the email, i was already fired. and so once again, a blatant attack on a veteran from somebody's congressman van orden who talks about veteran first veterans are the most important thing. but in my case, apparently he reported me to doge slash elon musk to get me fired. didn't work, though. >> well, van orden's office provided us with this statement, which questioned how effective the veteran's office is at delivering services, and said this specifically about you, sir. while i love the va and getting my health care there as a disabled veteran, there are problems that need to be addressed. data from the los angeles, va, where mr. ruiz was formerly employed, is a prime example of bureaucrats who are more focused on self-promotion than providing services to

veterans, which is their actual job. mr. ruiz is the poster child for self-aggrandizement, as he exploits his former position at va for public fame and political gain, unquote. what is your response to that? >> i won't respond to that because he made the show. but i'll tell you this much. i was in dc this week with a lot of senators. senator blumenthal spoke on the senate floor, and he mentioned all his veterans fighting for veterans, fighting for our rights. and guess how many republicans were on the floor that day? zero. so i'm not going to respond to van orden. what i'm going to tell you is a lot of federal employees are upset. we want answers. we want our jobs back. and i'm not going to speak on the va. i think van orden should call the director of the va, not me. and more importantly, i think senators in dc. i have some advice for you. go to the senate floor and vote for republicans. vote for veterans, because at this point, all the republicans have done is you've turned your back on all the veterans that you supposedly

love. and that's not good. >> mr. tony ruiz, thank you for your service, and thank you for joining me tonight. >> thank you very much, ma'am. >> george floyd's family is speaking out today, tying the people who are calling for trump to pardon derek chauvin. stay in your lane. >> this is the. >> fifth year we were supposed to see progress. we were supposed to see progress. >> pronamel clinical enamel strength can help us to keep our enamel for a lifetime. it's backed by science. it is clinically proven to strengthen. our teeth. i would recommend this toothpaste to everybody. >> it's really an amazing. >> product. >> look out, cause here i come. have you always had trouble with your weight? me too. >> discover the power of wegovy. >> with wegovy. >> i lost 35. >> pounds. >> and some lost over 46 pounds. >> and i'm keeping the weight off.

>> i'm reducing my. >> risk. >> wegovy is the only weight management medicine proven to reduce risk of major cardiovascular events such as death, heart attack or stroke in adults with known heart disease and obesity. don't use. >> wegovy with semaglutide or glp one medicines or in children under 12. don't take if you or your family had mtc men2 or if allergic to it. tell your provider if you plan to have surgery or a procedure, are breastfeeding, pregnant, or plan to be. stop taking and get medical help right away. if you get a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, or any of these allergic reactions. serious side effects may include pancreas inflammation and gallbladder or severe stomach problems. call your prescriber if you have any of these symptoms. wegovy may cause low blood sugar in people with diabetes, especially if you take medicines to treat diabetes. call your prescriber about vision changes. if you feel your heart racing while at rest, or if you have mental changes, depression or thoughts of suicide may occur. common side effects include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, stomach pain, flu or upset headache, feeling tired, dizzy or bloated, gas and heartburn. some side effects

lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. >> with wegovy. >> i'm losing weight. >> i'm keeping it off. >> and i'm lowering my cv risk. >> wegovy. >> ask your prescriber about wegovy. if you're. >> 55 and up, t mobile has plans built. >> just for you. >> two lines of unlimited. for just 30 bucks a line, that's. a 45% savings compared to verizon and at&t. >> it's not just the savings that are great with our t mobile plan. there's all this value from all these other things that t mobile offers. >> switch today and get. >> two free 5g. >> phones like the motorola edge with turbopower charging. that gives you power for. >> the day in just 15. >> minutes, and two lines of. >> unlimited for just. >> 30 bucks a line. >> t-mobile has. >> been such a savings for us. >> we love it. >> there are days. >> i feel stuck in my head, even on an antidepressant. lingering depression symptoms can make it hard to break through. i wanted more from my antidepressant. i asked about vraylar. adding vraylar to an antidepressant significantly reduces overall

depression. symptoms better than an antidepressant alone. >> vraylar isn't. >> approved for elderly. >> patients with dementia related psychosis due to increased risk of death or stroke. report changes in behavior or suicidal thoughts to your doctor. antidepressants can increase these in children and young adults. report fever, stiff muscles, or confusion, which may be life threatening or uncontrolled muscle movements, which may be permanent. high blood sugar, which can lead to coma or death. weight gain and high cholesterol may occur. difficulty moving tremors. slow or uncontrolled body movements, restlessness, and feeling like you need to move. nausea. constipation. insomnia. dizziness, increased appetite, and fatigue are common. side effects may not appear for weeks. >> vraylar breaking through to relief. ask about vraylar. >> this is the emirates premium economy seat. economy. perhaps they need to call it something else.

>> we've always. >> said never. >> sell a house in the winter. well, that's not exactly true. with open door, you can skip the showings and get a real cash offer. and if you close before the holidays, you don't have to move till after new year's. you are disguising my voice here, right? >> of course. >> just checking. like i was saying. >> it's true. >> open door makes selling easy in any season. >> i'm valeria león in mexico city, and this is cnn george floyd's family sending a message tonight. >> stay in your lane. you know, i would just say stay in your lane. you know, your opinion is your opinion, but facts is facts and the fact is, chauvin's knee was on my brother's neck. the fact is, he held him down there

to his last breath. >> that was terrence floyd responding to a right wing push to pardon the police officer convicted of murdering his brother. the push coming from conservative commentator and podcaster ben shapiro, who wrote to president trump calling on him to pardon derek chauvin. >> it's egregious, egregious, egregious. and he should be prosecuted. this officer to the fullest extent of the law and to which the evidence shows. and by the way, everyone agrees with this. >> a starkly different call for action than we had back in 2020. >> the evidence demonstrates that derek chauvin did not, in fact, commit murder of george floyd. george floyd was high on fentanyl. he had a significant preexisting heart condition. george floyd was saying he could not breathe before he was even out of the car i think we have those reversed in terms of the way that he has articulated his changed opinion or his thoughts on this, but this didn't stop there because elon musk reposted shapiro's pardon push on x.

>> joining us now is former minneapolis police chief medaria arradondo. he has a new book coming out in may titled chief rondo securing justice for the murder of george floyd. chief, thank you for joining. why do you think this idea of pardoning derek chauvin is gaining gaining steam now? >> thank you so much for having me on your show this evening. you know, i'm not really sure why it's gaining steam now. what i do know is that within a week after the killing of mr. floyd, president trump said that it was a grave tragedy, that it never should have happened and that it filled americans with anger, grief and horror. and i absolutely agree with president trump's reflection and statement back then. so i'm not sure why it's gaining traction now. mr. shapiro, although i don't know him personally. he's known to be a highly intellectual person. he covers a wide range of thought provoking topics. i'm just not sure why this is coming up at this time

now. >> you know, a documentary has been making the rounds with all sorts of conspiracies about the case. things like chauvin was persecuted, that he was acting within his training. i mean, you were the police chief at the time. what were the facts? >> yeah, laura, the facts were that then former officer chauvin, he violated department policy. he certainly violated department training. and above all else, he violated our values and any civilized police agency in this country would know that the end result of what derek chauvin caused in terms of mr. floyd's death, it speaks for itself. i am someone that believes in the rule of law and due process and the state court we had 12 individuals. a jury of his peers performing their civic and solemn duty to listen to the facts, to listen to the evidence. and they rendered a decision. and furthermore, laura, in the federal portion of the civil rights trial of derek

chauvin himself, admitted culpability and pled guilty to that. so, again again, i haven't had a chance to speak with mr. shapiro, but people who are looking at this from a reasonable looking at it from a lens of law and evidence and facts it speaks for itself. and i also am concerned, laura, that this can trigger the trauma for the family. i think about mr. floyd's family, what they've had to go through. his dear daughter gianna, and police chiefs and more importantly, police officers around the country who have been trying to repair and rebuild those relationships over the past five years. we owe it to them to help support them, to move forward so that this doesn't continue to reignite old wounds. >> chief, i'm so glad you pointed out the impact to the family. i mean, even just myself. introducing our conversation, just watching that video play, even in that small portion. it's difficult. it's so unnerving. and it's just devastatingly tragic to watch,

even for that moment in time. you know, you point out there's also the federal and the state. even if trump were to pardon chauvin, he could only do so with respect to a federal charge. but what would it mean symbolically if he were to do that, even though it wouldn't impact the state level charges well, i think what it would do symbolically for some there are some that that felt aggrieved by the justice system finally working. >> and, and i will tell you that for many in our country, for the justice system to to to work itself out, to come and render a decision based on the facts, based on the evidence, they have not seen that, historically, ever before the murder of mr. floyd was by far the singular most historical impacting incident in our nation. and so, again, the men and women who are out there every day working and

serving their communities, they're trying to rebuild trust. they're trying to collaborate with their communities to move forward. and so i think we owe it to them to sort of tamper down this, this sort of rhetoric and and to move forward and of course, for the family again, i think about the family during this time they don't need to be retraumatized by this. >> i cannot wait to read your book. you detail in it your perspective of the hours, the days, the weeks, frankly, the months after george floyd was killed. talk to me about what that has been like for you. >> well, you know, when you're when you're leading and certainly when you're leading during a crisis, you you just focus on trying to get your, your city through that. and so that was really first of mine in front of mine for me. but i also the book really highlights about hope and how important hope is. regardless of how bad it was getting, i knew that we as a city, as a department, we were going to get through this year. but it also talks about

unconventional allies. we could not have gotten through that without some very important, ordinary people doing some extraordinary things, certainly in minneapolis, but also across the country. and so the book certainly highlights that. but it's also about hope, laura, because at the end of the day, i think we owe that as an obligation to our children and our future generations. >> well, this mother then, thanks you for that optimism that is forthcoming. and your brand new book, chief madeira arredondo. as always, thank you. >> thank you very much. >> up next, a federal judge sending a reminder to president trump, an american president is not a king, unquote. >> introducing the all new sophie. >> plus. >> america's most. >> rewarding financial. >> membership all in one app. you get our highest apy on savings, plus a 1% match on recurring sofi invest deposits, plus unlimited access to financial planners. plus so much

more. and now, when you subscribe to sophie plus, you could win one of america's top ambitions. enter the power of plus sweepstakes today. sophie, get your money right. >> at fisher investments. we may look like other money managers, but we're different. >> you can't be that different. >> we are. we have a team of specialists, not only in investing, but also in financial and estate planning and more. >> your clients rely on you for all that. >> yes. and as a fiduciary, we always put their interests first. >> but you still sell commission based products, right? >> no. we have a simple management fee structured so we do better when our clients do better. >> huh. we're more different than i thought. >> at fisher investments, we're clearly different. >> we've waited so long for this spot. >> oh, yeah. >> shingles doesn't care. shingles is a painful, blistering rash that can last for weeks. >> we got the best seats in the house. >> she doesn't care. 99% of adults 50 years or older already have the virus that causes shingles inside them. and it can

reactivate any time. >> everyone's here for my birthday. >> cute. >> shingles doesn't care. but shingrix protects. only shingrix has proven over 90% effective. shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix doesn't protect everyone. it isn't for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients or to a previous dose. tell your healthcare provider if you're pregnant or breastfeeding. increased risk of guillain-barre syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can happen, so take precautions. most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling where injected. muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach. shingles doesn't. >> care, but shingrix protects. >> ask your doctor or pharmacist about shingrix today. >> safelite repair. >> safelite replace. >> sadly windshield. >> chips. >> can turn into windshield cracks. but at least you can go to safelite. com and schedule a fix in minutes. sweet safelite can come to you for free, and

our highly trained techs can replace your windshield right at your home. >> safelite safelite. >> don't wait. go to safelite. com and schedule now. >> safelite repair safelite. replace. >> liberty. >> liberty mutual is all she talks about. since we saved hundreds by bundling our home and auto insurance. >> it's pronounced liberty. >> liberty. for all those making it big out there... ...shouldn't your mobile service be able to keep up with you? get wifi speeds up to a gig at home and on the go. introducing powerboost, only from xfinity mobile. now that's big. xfinity internet customers, cut your mobile bill in half vs. t-mobile, verizon, and at&t for your first year.

plus, ask how to get the new samsung galaxy s25+ on us. work faster than old school pills. see if sparks are right for you. arrokoth sparks. >> this is. >> cnn. >> the world's news network. >> closed captioning. >> brought to you by aarp. join and get instant. >> access to member benefits. >> join aarp for $15 for one year with automatic renewal, and get instant access to member benefits and social programs. join and get a free gift. plus aarp, the magazine. >> new tonight quote an american president is not a king. that's a direct quote from a federal judge as she reversed trump's firing of the former head of the national labor relations board.

the ruling comes after gwynne wilcox, who was appointed to the nlrb by president biden, sued the trump administration, arguing that her ousting violated federal law. and the judge did not mince words in her ruling, writing, quote, an american president is not a king, not even an elected one, and his power to remove federal officers and honest civil servants like wilcox is not absolute. a president who touts an image of himself as a king or a dictator fundamentally misapprehends the role under the constitution. quite the statement to make, considering she's speaking about a president who posted this picture captioned long live the king. and there's more. today another federal judge is extending an order that prevented the white house from freezing billions in congressionally approved funds to 22 states and washington, d.c., writing that the executive's categorical freeze of appropriated and obligated funds fundamentally undermines

the distinct constitutional roles of each branch of our government. here, the executive put itself above congress. joining us now to discuss former miami-dade county court judge jeff swartz. thank you, judge, for joining. look, the white house attempts to overhaul the federal government, as we're seeing and the judges have been stopping and stepping in to stop what they assert is overreach by the president, which is, well, literally their job as outlined in the constitution. but trump keeps attacking them, calling them activists and highly political judges who want us to slow down or stop what's at risk here, your honor? >> what's really. >> at risk. here is the. >> separation of powers. >> we talk about it a lot, and what's really at risk. >> here is. >> the authority of the courts. and he attacks. the authority of the courts and their legitimacy., because. they're really almost the last guardrail that's left. it is the courts that are literally. and he. >> is right.

>> going to stop some of the things that are happening now. and he's not a king. i think a lot of people are using that phrase now, since katanji jackson used it when she was on the district court talking about trump in 2019. >> elon musk has repeatedly called for the impeachment of judges. how would that even work? obviously, he himself not an elected official, but he's calling for them. >> it won't work. you can't impeach federal judges. there are a lot of judges who have been impeached. but even if you get an impeachment, that is, charges go through the house. you're never going to come up with 67 votes to remove anyone. and that's what you need. you need a two thirds majority. so it's a waste of time. but it's meant to intimidate judges. and hopefully at this point change the course of what's happening in the courts right now. >> and judge, we're seeing a lot a lot of these legal challenges are making their way to the appellate process as

well. eventually, some will land in the supreme court. how do you think they'll go trump's way or no, this. >> well, you know, that's really surprising because the opinion that came out from scotus yesterday had a majority of 5 to 4, and that majority was made up of the four women that included coney barrett and the chief justice. and it left the other four with a dissenting opinion that literally was written by neil gorsuch. and it's understandable. i mean, i've read it several times. i don't understand what he's talking about. they were just very angry. i also watched coney barrett and the chief at the end of the speech last night, and they were, excuse me? and they were talking and i saw what the president said to the chief, and i saw coney barrett shake his hand. there was a look on their face that kind of gave it away.

they knew the next day, and i guess it was night before last. the next day there was going to be an opinion that was going to make him very unhappy. and that's exactly what happened. you kind of, you know, they were taking in the thank yous, but i think that we're seeing what might be a solid five person majority that may stand against many of the things that are going to make donald trump unhappy. >> poker faces. indeed, after what actually transpired, judge jeff schwartz, thank you for joining. >> nice to be with you. >> thank you. nice to see you. thank you all for watching. anderson cooper 360 is next. >> tonight on 360. what caused this