>> you have 16 years to put those marketplace solutions in place. you had the last eight years when the republicans controlled everything and you didn't put one of those major initiatives in place. >> actually we tried. we tried to do things like cost and tort reform. >> the democrats have incorporated so many republican ideas. once again, you were for these ideas before you were against them and right now the american people see what's in the bill and they're going to support it. let's talk about the substance. i love the substance. >> you can make the poison taste better and put all kinds of things in it but it is still a poisonous bill in what it does to health care. these guys can't even give a one-minute speech and make it work and they're somehow going to pass a 2,000-page bill? >> 25% of the american people now receive their health care through some government force, whether medicare, medicaid, or the va. i can tell you it's exceptional. >> and they're a hundred trillion dollars in debt. >> the bottom line is you do all

these estimates for ten years out and 20 years out and you just don't know what the real numbers are going to be. right? >> i want to go back to capitol hill. dana bash is working this story, a very significant story, and there's a lot of confusion out there involving this democratic congressman from michigan. bart stupak has been the leader in the fight against abortion. does not like the language in the senate bill on abortion. he says it doesn't go far enough. he agrees with the catholic bishops, for example, that this would give at least a back-handed way for the federal government to fund or subsidize abortion here in the united states and goes against the so-called hyde amendment. what are you learning about bart stupak and his colleagues who oppose this legislation but maybe, maybe are thinking about voting yes? >> as you see, the house is voting right now, the first in a series of votes we are going to see today, a procedural vote. but sometimes when the house votes that is obviously the time when members get together and

just to give you a little color, our producer is out there and she's reporting that we're seeing some of the talks out in the open. bart stupak is huddling in a corner in there with some of his colleagues who are also fellow democrats who are against abortion and who are undecided and their votes really will depend on whether they work out a deal with the white house on an executive order about this abortion language. he's talking to earl pomroy of north dakota, and alan monahan of west virginia. those are some of the crucial votes. that's kind of the small caucus if you will of democrats. and it seems as though they're going back and forth on the specifics word for word of the language they're talking about of this executive order. it's happening right in the open and we're watching it, obviously going to try to talk to bart stupak as he comes off the floor to see if there is any resolution but, again, just about an hour ago he told us he was very close. he is negotiating directly with white house lawyers on this. >> and so, clearly, if bart

stupak and his ten or 12 colleagues decide to vote in favor of it, then it's a done deal by all accounts, right, dana? >> it certainly seems that way, because they all voted for the bill last time when it passed the house and it did pass and you've already had a handful if not more democrats who voted no on the bill in november who have switched to yes. and few are going the other way so it seems as though it's easily a done deal if that happens. >> you'll stay in close touch with us and let us know if in fact this happens. that would be very significant. candy, very significant in many respects. one, if they agree to do it, it would give an opening for some of those nervous democrats who are in districts that are republican. you know what? i was going to help you, but please give me a pass now. let me vote no. at least we'll have a better chance of maintaining a democratic majority come november. >> right. and it helps the speaker because she can stay speaker and it helps these folks get re-elected

if, in fact, they need to vote no because that's where their district is swinging. and one thing about stupak, over the course of the last week or so when i've talked to congressmen they said he really wants to vote yes on this. they knew all along that he wanted to and they just needed to find kind of the magic fix and even though you're looking and saying okay. he's going to like reiterate the language in a presidential executive order? what does that mean? >> that's all he's looking for. but this is a tremendous political accomplishment for barack obama if he gets this done. he use that which couldn't be united, the democratic party. but the republicans, i think, will raise a question. is there such a thing now as a blue dog democrat or a pro life democrat or a pro business democrat or are they like sasquatch, a myth, you don't really see them? because president obama has

united the democratic party on the left in this bill not the center or the right. >> if the president signs an executive order to reassure bart stupak and the other antiabortion democrats that you know what? we're not changing the hyde amendment. this is good. there will be those liberals let's say or those who support abortion rights for women who say this is going way too far and in effect it will undermine a woman's right, woman's ability to get an abortion. >> well, if he reaffirms the hyde amendment which says no federal funds going for abortions that is currently the law of the land which the liberal side of the democratic party has lived with and would continue to live with in order to get health care reform. what's interesting for the democratic party is that you're talking about a dozen or so pro life democrats. suddenly pro life democrats have become a very visible part of the democratic party. i was talking to a democratic political strategist this week who said to me, isn't that interesting for the democratic party? they're on the same side as the

nuns are in this and this is not bad for catholic voters and the democratic party when we go to the 2010 mid-term elections. >> we've always had pro life democrats. we just haven't seen them so visible in the party. >> this is obviously a matter of principle for these democrats like bart stupak and we'll see if they can finesse a way to allow him and his colleagues to go ahead and vote for health care reform. all right. we'll get ready for the first substantive discussion on this important day here in washington and what is going on and the most important votes, including the vote on the senate health care reform legislation. we're here. we're here for you. our coverage on cnn continues after this.

we're watching what's happening on the floor of the house of representatives. they basically wrapped up the first part of this day, a lot of procedural issues, parliamentary

maneuvers, one-minute presentations by democrats and republicans, and now they're getting ready to start dealing with the substance, a vote on a rule that allows this to go forward. and now the all important vote on the senate, the senate health care reform bill that passed christmas eve. it now comes before the house of representatives. without any changes the house if it has 216 aye votes will pass it and it will go to the president for his signature later tonight or tomorrow. the separate reconciliation legislation will then immediately come before members of the house. if they pass that, it will then go to the senate and members of the senate will start a debate that could last a few days, a few weeks, and may continue. those changes may or may not be approved by the senate. they could tweak it, forcing the changes to go back to the house of representatives, so that will still be open but if in fact the senate version is signed into law by the president, that will be the law of the land. our senior political analyst,

david, i want to underscore how significant that will be. forget the reconciliation bill. the fact that the house passes the senate bill and the president signs it into law if that happens, talk about that, because that will be historic. >> it will be a gigantic change in american health insurance, wolf. as sanjay has been emphasizing, there will be many benefits that will come to people directly whether pre-existing conditions for children or small businesses getting some help in paying for insurance or people who have got pre-existing conditions as adults being able to go into these big exchanges. all of the benefits, a lot of the benefits will flow quickly and then there will be other subsidizations that will come down the road. there is also -- and i think this is why this bill is so controversial -- yes, it's historic in the sense of making big, social changes. it's also historic because we've never had, in the last 60 years, such a big piece of social

legislation pass on the partisan vote in a country that's so deeply divided and as you well know for the last seven months or so the polls have steadily shown that more americans oppose this than favor it so the democrats are -- this is a courageous vote in many ways. it also may be one that's perilous for them but i don't think it's going to end the debate. we're going to be fighting over health care probably the rest of our lives. this will begin to put into place an insurance system. the republicans will then campaign to try to repeal it. this bill does not solve the health care cost problems. premiums are going to continue to go up. i think, wolf, this is an historic day but in many ways it's the end of the beginning not the beginning of the end on health care reform. it's a dramatic step. >> it sort of reminds me, and, david, you were there, it reminds me of the first year of

bill clinton's administration when he got the congress to pass his economic package including tax increases and there was no republican support for that. he got it passed and he paid a huge price in the mid-term elections in '94, the democrats did, but that was done without -- >> the democrats -- >> the democrats paid a huge price. he got himself re-elected in '96 but the democrats did pay a huge price for that. >> the democrats paid a huge price in the house of representatives and in the senate. for bill clinton that bill did help turn the economy around so he went on to win re-election rather handily. what is also striking, wolf, is how different this health care fight is from the clinton health care fight. barack obama and nancy pelosi and harry reid have carried the ball so much farther down the field, you know, bill clinton and hillary clinton's health care plan was extremely controversial, so much so that

it never got out of committee and never even got to a floor vote. so this is a huge advance from the democratic party's point of view as gloria has been pointing out and donna has been pointing out but it also does represent as alex has been saying continuously here now, it represents a big political gamble for the party. >> stand by for a moment. i want everybody to stand by. the clerk has now started reading the rule of what this bill will be allowed to do and won't be allowed to do, some of the procedure. this will be the first vote in favor of the rule. you want to listen in briefly and we'll give you a little parliamentary flavor of what's happening on the house floor. >> pursuant to section 202 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2010 if called up by the majority leader or his designee. all points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 10 of rule 21. the amendment and the nature of a substitute printed in part a of the report of the committee on rules accompanying this resolution modified by the

amendment printed in part b of the report of the committee on rules shall be considered as adopted. the bill as amended shall be considered as read. >> a little flavor of the parliamentary jargon going on on the floor of the house of representatives. this will set up the first vote in this process. this vote will then be followed by a vote of the senate bill and a separate vote on the reconciliation bill. the changes in the senate bill, that reconciliation bill as it's called will be sent to the senate for a consideration. the senate bill, if passed by the house, will then go to the president of the united states for his signature and that will be the law of the land. gloria is here and has been watching all this. candy crowley, and the best political team on television. you want to make a point. >> i want to add to something david said before. i do think we'll be arguing and arguing over this for years because this is a measure where you don't see a lot of the benefits for sometime and also you don't pay for a lot of it until the back end. my big question here is,

everyone understands we have a big deficit problem in this country. they pushed back one of the largest revenue raisers in this bill the so-called excise tax on high end insurance plans, cadillac plans, largely because unions did not like it and were adamant about it. >> i don't think that takes effect until 2018. >> right. so the tax does not take effect until 2018. now, if you're a member of congress in 2018 and you've got a new tax coming down the pike you all can answer this question. have you ever met a member of congress who's going to say oh, sure i'm going to let that new big tax go into effect without maybe just deciding i want to vote against it instead? so that's something that a lot of people find very worrisome when you talk about deficit reduction because can you ever really expect that tax to go into effect? >> but there will be some other taxes that will go into effect right away. for example the tax on investment gains for wealthier americans.

that will go into effect pretty soon so that will bring in some revenue if people are interested about the revenue side of this. let's listen in a little bit more to the republicans right now objecting to some of these rules proposed. >> after the debate the chair will put the question of consideration. the chair recognizes the gentleman from wisconsin. >> mr. speaker let me quote from a letter from the speaker of the house to the director of the congressional budget office dated yesterday. quote the congressional budget office and joint committee on taxation estimated that the total cost of those mandates to state, local, and tribal governments and the private sector would greatly exceed the annual threshholds established under the unfunded mandates reform act. this bill is the mother of all unfunded mandates. there are mandates on states. the new medicaid mandate is expected to cost according to the cbo 20 additional billion dollars on states. >> the house will be in order.

the gentleman deserves to be heard. >> shh. >> the gentleman may continue. >> let's start with the state mandate. $20 billion on states in medicaid. democratic governors have been speaking out against this. let me quote governor rendell from pennsylvania. quote, i think it's an unfunded mandate. we just don't have the wherewithal to absorb this health care bill without some new revenue source, close quote. there is an individual mandate. it mandates individuals purchase government-approved health insurance or face a fine to be collected by the irs which will need $10 billion additional dollars in 16,500 new irs agents to police and enforce this mandate. there is a business mandate. it mandates businesses provide government-approved health insurance or face penalties. if you don't offer health insurance coverage you have to pay $2,000 per employee. if you do offer health insurance coverage, but one of your employees decides to take the federal subsidy, you have to pay

up to $3,000 per employee anyway. there's a health plan mandate. there are mandates and health plans to comply with new federal benefits, mandates without any funds to meet the new requirements. there are new medical loss ratios of 80% and 85%. this hardly jivs with the notion if you like what you have you can keep it because millions of americans will exactly lose just that. there is a provider mandate. this mandates many health care providers must actually provide exactly what washington says. they're forced to take unilateral reimbursement cuts from the new independent payment advisory board. mr. speaker, at this time i want to elaborate quite a bit more but i will reserve the balance of my time. >> the gentleman reserves the balance of his time. >> paul ryan, one of the rising stars in the republican party, making it clear he hates, he hates this proposed health care reform legislation and he's outlining his points why this would be a disaster for the united states.

we'll hear a very different perspective from some of the democrats who will argue over this. it's interesting, candy, that they're beginning this debate really right now on this rule issue whether or not the rule will go forward. let's talk about that and our special coverage of this health care reform debate on the floor of the house and the upcoming votes will continue right after this. national car rental knows i'm picky. so, at national, i go right past the counter... and you get to choose any car in the aisle. choose any car? you cannot be serious! okay. seriously, you choose. go national. go like a pro.

look at what we're looking at. before even passing this bill, mr. speaker, we are going into a tidal wave of red ink of debt. the interest alone on the national debt that's about to befall us will be crushing to our economy. i ask the congressional budget office, what would my three children face when they were my age? mr. speaker i would simply say the house is not in order. >> paul ryan, the republican congressman from wisconsin

making the case that this health care reform legislation if enacted by the congress, signed into law by the president, would cause an explosion of debt for the united states, deficit spending. he has that chart showing it would go on for years and years to come. all of this is very early in the process of the next few hours when we will see whether or not this legislation lives or dies. sanjay gupta is here with us, our chief medical correspondent. sanjay, the cost. a lot of people are worried, deeply worried about the cost. stand by for a moment. i'm told dana bash is getting new information up on capitol hill. dana, what are you learning? >> reporter: wolf, i want to tell you i'm actually just off the house chamber so i am in a very good location because we're seeing members of congress go back and forth. in fact, just moments ago the house speaker nancy pelosi walked right by here. her office is right down there. i walked with her just to ask her where things stand. she was very careful not to say explicitly that she has that crucial 216 votes to pass this

bill. she said i never talk about a vote. but as she turned the corner into her office i said, madame speaker, presumably you would not bring this bill to the floor if you didn't have the votes. she stopped. she turned. she smiled. and she said, that would be correct. so that was a pretty strong indication that they're feeling pretty good, the smile and very definitive answer there. one other thing she did say or maybe she didn't say which was noteworthy and that is on this whole question of whether or not that group of democrats staunchly antiabortion, whether they are close to a deal with the white house on language on an executive order making clear there would be no federal taxpayer dollars for abortion, she said that this is something that the white house is dealing with and that we should check with the white house. very interesting dynamic going on here. they have the democratic leadership, they have kind of put this the hands of the white house and it was clear talking to bart stupak earlier, he is directly negotiating with white house lawyers on this. >> very interesting stuff.

dana, stand by. we'll get back to you. debbie wassermann schultz is a democratic congressman from florida. she is in the leadership in the house of representatives. she's joining us now from capitol hill. 216 votes. is it a done deal, congresswoman? congresswoman, i don't know if you can hear me. >> i can hear you now, yes. >> is it a done deal? do you have 216 votes? >> i think with the last, just having done some work on the floor talking to some of the members concerned about the abortion language i know they're in the final stages of working out some language for an executive order with the white house and i believe once that's finalized then i think we will be able to be confident about the final vote. >> you're the deputy majority whip. >> one of them. >> but you're the chief deputy majority whip is that correct? >> no. there are several of us. i'm one of the chief deputy

whips. >> but your job is to count the votes, get the votes. what i hear you saying is that bart stupak, the democratic congressman from michigan, if he gets this executive order promised from the white house, tightening up some of the language on abortion, he will then vote aye is that right? >> wolf, i haven't spoken to bart stupak directly. i have spoken to other members who are also concerned for the same reasons that bart stupak is, so from the conversations i've had with them, the language is being finalized and once finalized i believe that will bring us over the -- at 216 if not over the number that we need. but we're still working diligently outside of those -- that group of members to make sure that we address the concerns and answer any questions for other members that might be there. >> as someone who supports abortion rights for women and i know you are in the forefront of that battle are you okay if the

white house makes a side deal in effect with congressman stupak and theeer and t eeother antiab democrats making this language tightening? >> it's not a side deal and not language tightening. it would simply from what i understand as a pro choice member restate that the hyde amendment is in effect, no federal funds will be spent to cover abortion in the health care reform legislation, which is what we've been saying the language already does, if that gives greater comfort to those members that have concerns, then i'm totally fine with that. >> we'll check back with you, congresswoman. thanks very much, debbie wassermann schultz, a deputy majority whip in the leadership of the house of representatives. >> yes. >> we'll take a quick break. we'll go back to the house floor and see what's going on. we know there's a lot of drama going on. we're not leaving it right here on cnn. >> for which he fought so long. his heart and his soul are in this bill.

while the above quote could easily refer to my father and the context could easily describe this health care debate, these words were, in fact, spoken by my father as he rose on the senate floor to honor his brother president kennedy during the debate on the 1964 civil rights act. the parallels between the struggle for civil rights and the fight to make quality affordable health care accessible to all americans are significant. it was dr. martin luther king jr. who said, of all forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane. health care is not only a civil right, it's a moral issue. thank you, madame speaker, for your political and moral leadership for helping those to secure a more advanced protection and benefits, especially in the area of mental

health and addiction. thank you, president obama, for delivering on your promise of providing the politics of hope rather than the politics of fear. i yield back the balance of my time. wellbeing. we're all striving for it. purina cat chow helps you nuture it in your cat... with a full family of excellent nutrition... and helpful resources. ♪ purina cat chow. share a better life. at sharp, our goal

is to reproduce every color in the world on tv. introducing quattron quad pixel technology. it adds a fourth color, yellow, to the standard rgb color system, creating a vast array of colors you can't see with your tv's three color technology. but, you can see this. whoa! oh my. [ male announcer ] quattron from sharp. you have to see it, to see it. [ engineer laughs ]

you're looking at live pictures of capitol hill inside the house of representatives on the floor right now. they started the debate on health care reform. they're considering a rule that will allow this process to go forward, some passionate discussion already under way. you heard republican congressman paul ryan of wisconsin make the case that this is simply way too expensive, will cause the united states to go further and further into historic debt if this is

passed. he obviously doesn't like it. the democrats are making exactly the other -- the opposite case, that the country needs this right now to avoid those kinds of escalating costs for health care in the united states. we're staying on top of this. we'll watch all the votes. dana bash is our senior congressional kornlcorresponden. she is up on capitol hill. you have some guests. >> reporter: right. you spoke to debbie wassermann schultz a democratic congresswoman from florida. i have another female congresswoman this time on the other side of the aisle, veteran republican congresswoman sue myrick of north carolina. thank you for joining us. >> sure. >> reporter: so you are somebody who has been known to work across the aisle but on this issue no way. why? >> well, because the bill is too massive. we can't afford it right now, and it's a very big concern of mine that government is in control of health care. a lot of us could have worked together across party lines and done eight or nine things we all

agree on, move bills separately, gotten the job done, and then move on to further whatever needs to be done. that wasn't given as a choice. >> reporter: are there some things in this bill that you actually like, substancewise, that you could say, i would support that if it was just independent from the big bill? >> well, no pre-existing conditions continues to stay in there. of course i support that and some of the insurance changes but i will not vote for this bill the way it is. i mean, our debt is already the largest anybody can remember in history and here we are adding another trillion to it. >> reporter: i want to ask you about the atmosphere. you have seen protesters everywhere. outside the offices, outside the capit capitol, even inside the house chamber. you've been here a few years. have you ever seen this kind of passion and frankly anger about an issue? >> i've never seen this level of intensity but most people are more fearful than they are angry. they are afraid for what's happening to their country and they are afraid for their children's future. that's what you're hearing in the protests.

it isn't really anger. >> reporter: thank you very much for joining us. wolf, we have one other member of congress here, very, very different. we've been talking about the freshmen democrats, those who have a lot on the line with this vote. here is one of them. this is a freshman democrat from the state of new york. thank you for joining us, congressman. >> good to be here. >> reporter: now, you are -- you voted yes on the house bill. you were unsure if you were going to vote yes on this bill but you are. why? >> well, because of the changes made in the senate bill. i had a lot of concerns about the senate bill, how it would affect new york, and how the taxation on benefits might actually hit middle class people and in fact hurt our effort to improve health care as we're trying to improve it but i think the changes the president suggested and we were able to negotiate do address all of those problems and in the end doing nothing is not an option. i was convinced by the president among others and my own constituents that this was our one and best chance. >> reporter: you've told me before this is a tough vote. >> oh, it's incredibly tough. i really do believe in that word

"representative." and this has been the most divided my constituency has been on any major issue. i still believe a major of my constituents support it but there's been a lot of misinformation out there and a lot of -- congresswoman myrick is right. people are awfully afraid. i almost think the other side is overplaying this a little bit so much that after this passes and people still have insurance and the sky doesn't fall and in fact small businesses start to get tax credits they're going to say wait a minute. i thought the whole thing was supposed to blow up. that's what the republicans told me. lo and bloeld everythiehold evee and some things are improved. i actually think the republicans are overplaying their hand a little bit and people will see there are a lot of good things in this bill they wanted a long time. >> reporter: you are one of those democrats, a new democrat, meaning a freshman, you are from a swing district. you are kind of one of those who is ground zero for potentially losing your job over this vote. do you think that's true? are you worried about that?

>> i think any member of congress who comes here and only thinks about whether they'll get re-elected is not doing his or her job well. you can lose your job at any time. i mean, if that's what the founders wanted. they wanted a representative body, one that would be directly accountable to the people in their district. so, look. you know, it is a tough vote. you never know for sure whether the policy is right. but i will tell you this. again, the fact that we're doing things like pre-existing conditions, making sure people don't get denied care, making sure there won't be medical bankruptcies again, there are all these things that both parties have want'd long time. patients' bill of rights was bipartisan and that's all in here. and, you know, this is so far from a government takeover, frankly less government involvement than nixon's legislation in the early '70s so i really think the other side is overplaying its hand. these are good improvements. it's not perfect, not as much as i wanted. i was for a public option. but this is better than the status quo. >> reporter: see you on the campaign trail.

>> go qs. beat gonzaga. we have to go on to sweet 16. >> reporter: a little march madness for you. >> we've got our own march madness on capitol hill right now and it isn't ending at least in the next few hours we'll watch it unfold. march madness here in washington. our special coverage will continue right after this. at northern trust, we understand... that while you may come from the same family... you know, son, you should take up something more strenuous. you have different needs and desires. - i'm reading a book. - what's a book? so we tailor plans for individuals, featuring a range of integrated solutions. you at your usual restaurant? son: maybe. see you tomorrow. stairs? elevator. to see how our multi-faceted approach... can benefit your multi-generational wealth, look ahead with us at northerntrust.com. [ engine revving ]

[ gorilla ] nice move. but can your retirement income keep pace with changing interest rates? this new variable anúéity from axa equitable has an option that can help your retirement income move with changing interest rates. but what do i know? i'm just the 800-pound gorilla in the room.

[ female announcer ] make the retirement cornerstone annuity from axa equitable part of your retirement plan. consider the charges, risks, expenses and investment objectives before purchasing a variable annuity. contact a financial professional for a prospectus containing this information. read it carefully. whoo hoo!

let's get to one of the republican leaders of the house of representative congressman eric cantor of virginia the minority whip, the number two republican in the house. congressman, any way you can stop the democrats from getting 216 votes to pass the senate health care bill? >> you know, wolf, we're trying to do everything that we possibly can to defeat this

bill. the fight will continue. we're looking towards the vote to take place sometime later this afternoon or evening but it's very clear that the vote count on the other side is tenuous at best. there's a reason for that. the american people have rejected this bill and this vote today, wolf, is reflective of the fact that this country is truly at a crossroads. and, you know, how folks vote today with this bill i think will have a lot to do with the legacy they leave and frankly whether they come back in november. >> is there any way you think you can get 216 votes to beat it? >> well, you know, we're shooting to get 38 democrat no votes. along with that, together with unanimous republican opposition, we can defeat this bill. >> how many democrats do you have in opposition right now? >> wolf, when i'm asked that question i always say, look, i'm the republican whip not the democratic whip. and what we're trying to do is work with our colleagues on the other side of the aisle, many of them who are hearing from their

constituents just as we are, that this is just a bad bill. you know, people don't want washington in between them and their doctor. they don't want to lay on top of the debt we already have a trillion more dollars. this is a bill that takes us in the wrong direction. and as you know, wolf, we have been working throughout the last year positing a much different solution and that is a common sense step-by-step approach that would first and foremost reduce costs of health care for most americans and begin to expand access to coverage in a much more sensible way. candy? >> congressman, we've had a lot of talk about what a risky vote this might be for democrats because of the polls you're referring to but other polls also show that people do like some of the major elements of this bill. is this not also risky for republicans when people see that, a, they can't be thrown

off their insurance for getting sick, that, b, there will be no lifetime caps that, c, pre-existing conditions for children will no longer be an excuse for not giving them coverage? aren't those popular items which might cause the american people to say, you know what? this was a pretty good bill? >> candy, if this bill passes, it's going to pass because nancy pelosi and her colleagues have used every bit of power they have and frankly some power that they shouldn't have to strike some political deals to deliver the votes to ram this thing through. but if that is going to happen, fan this does pass, republicans will work to repeal this bill as the american people want but we will work to replace it with positive reform that speaks to the kind of issues that you raise but does so in a sustainable way that will lower costs. the problem here is, candy, this

is a trillion dollar bill that lays taxes on small businesses, cuts medicare benefits for seniors, and it does nothing to rein in costs. we are going to be in a much worse condition in ten years from now, five years from now, and then have all the debt to live under. >> this is gloria, congressman. with all due respect, how can you take away something from people that they like? i mean, don't you think you might have some fewer republicans along with you if as candy says you have this legislation that does some things that they actually like? how can you repeal the whole thing? >> gloria, as you know, some of the real detracktions in the bil like the taxes on small business owners, taxes on your capital gains in your stock dividends, those kick in long before the benefits of this health care bill kick in so you're going to have a situation where the american people if you think they're frustrated at this attempt now, they're really going to be frustrated.

>> but you have to pay for it, congressman. >> well, the fact of the matter is you don't go about paying for it with a trillion dollars right now. we have proposed as you know every step of the way a very common sense approach that promotes competition that allows folks to maintain the freedom of decision making between them and their doctor and doesn't bankrupt this country. that's the difference in our approach. sure, you have to pay for changes. but let's do so in a way that promotes competition and gives patients choice. >> so the bottom line right now, congressman cantor, it looks like the democrats are getting very, very close to 216 and nancy pelosi said she just told our own dana bash she wouldn't have a roll call if she wouldn't think they would get the 216. if they pass the senate version they will then send that legislation to the president. he will sign it into law either tonight or tomorrow and that's the law of the land irrespective of what the senate does as far as the fix that the reconciliation, the fixes the

reconciliation bill is concerned. is that your understanding? >> that is exactly right. that's the risk here for many of the democrats who are on the fence, because they know the certainty, the dispositive act here is passage of the senate bill. it then goes to the white house for a signature and becomes a law of the land. and remember, that bill has in it all of the kickbacks, all of the back room deals that the public has become so enraged at. and there is no guarantee that the senate will be able to deliver on this reconciliation bill in any of the fixes, frankly, that the democrats on the fence want to see happen. so you could end up with all of the worst things happening and, again, end up costing this country, our kids, their kids, a trillion dollars. >> one final question. we only have a few seconds left, congressman. is it true that the republicans are going to try in the house floor in the next few hours to delay and delay and delay and get a final vote, maybe even in

the middle of the night? >> wolf, we'll try and maintain a seriousness about the way we go about our opposition to this bill. you will see today on display republicans engaged in the debate talking about the principles as to why we oppose this takeover of our health care as well offering the alternatives that we have every step of the way to show that there is a better way and that you know what? we can do better and that people expect washington to do better. >> i'll take that as a "yes", congressman. thanks very much. we'll check back with you and i'm sure we'll talk several times over the next few hours. appreciate. >> thanks, wolf. >> we'll take a quick break and continue our coverage of this important legislation right after this.

are you feeling old and tired? do you want to get that jump back into your step? hey, i'm don shula, and i lost 32 pounds on nutrisystem. and i'm mary anne shula, and i've lost 23 pounds on nutrisystem. nutrisystem silver for 2010, the weight-loss program designed for older americans. now you can lose weight and feel great again! let's face it, the older you get, the harder it is to lose weight. not anymore, honey. it's easy with nutrisystem. for a limited time, get our best tv offer: four weeks free! that's right, you can get an extra 28 breakfasts, 28 lunches, 28 dinners, and 28 desserts. that's 112 meals free just for starting today. i look and feel so much better, and so does coach.

i'm back to my playing weight. nutrisystem silver is based on the breakthrough science of the glycemic index, high in fiber and p÷od carbs to keep you feeling fuller longer and help consistently burn calories. this is the kind of food you grew up loving: pizza, burgers, lasagna. and don't forget the chocolate, honey. i love chocolate. order now and you can get an extra four weeks of meals free. that's right, 112 meals absolutely free. even the shipping is free. with nutrisystem, there's no counting, no measuring, and no embarrassing weigh-ins. it's a no-brainer program. order today. nutrisystem silver can change your life. people say i look 10 years younger. hey, i feel 10 years younger. coach used to shuffle when he lked. now we both take the stairs like kids. smart money named nutrisystem the best value of popular weight-loss programs. trust me, you will lose weight. see how nutrisystem silver can change your life. for a limited time, get our best tv offer:

four weeks free! that's right, you can get an extra 28 breakfasts, 28 lunches, 28 dinners, and 28 desserts, 112 meals absolutely free. call or click now. get back in the game.

there's still a little bit more than four minutes left on this first of several preliminary votes before the real votes start falling into line. this is a vote on will the house now consider the resolution and they're talking about the rules resolution that will define some of the rules. there will then be two hours of actual debate on the senate bill before the members actually vote on the senate health care reform bill. it looks like, candy, at least based on some of the preliminary information we're getting, this could be a long night? >> yes, because i'm just guessing, because what the republicans want to do at this point, if it were up to the democrats they'd have the vote and we'd all go home. the republicans want to make their points. this is, you know, primetime watching at this point, and they feel the need in this last moment to use the house floor

and get their points across, which they're doing. >> this first vote by the way is pretty much along party lines right now which -- we shouldn't be surprised, gloria, the democrats will vote one way the republicans the other way. the divide is pretty significant. >> it's really important in these votes as we all know they have these teams of whips as we call them walking up and down the aisles saying you better follow your party on the rule because the rule sets the terms of the debate. and so it's very important for the democrats to get the rule passed or else they can't actually have the debate on the issue of the day. >> but unlike the senate, donna, in the house there's a limit to how long the delaying tactics could go forward. the senate is basically open ended and the house, the speaker has a lot of control. >> that's absolutely right. and i think the democrats understand how to get around all of these what i call procedural gymnastics where people will come and try to, you know, reject something, call for a

motion to a quorum call. they will come up with all kind of crazy tactics. at the end of the day the speaker can continue with the order and call for a vote once they get to the proper place and what i call the rules of the day and there will be a vote. >> you heard eric cantor, alex castellanos, say, you know what? they're going to do whatever it takes to stop this because passage would be a disaster. >> i think donna said something earlier and gloria, too, that this is not just about the politics of this thing. this is an issue that on both sides people feel important principles are at stake. i think for democrats you're seeing a big difference here, democrats and republicans. the democrats are more comfortable perhaps with an america where you give up a little prosperity for a little more equality and they might say republicans might do the reverse, might -- we won't have as equal a health care for all but we'll have a more prosperous society. these are big, fundamental issues about the role of government in our lives so, yes,

you'll see them i think pull out all the stops, republicans, to try to stop this thing. >> i think it's interesting, sanjay. you're a doctor. a lot of the doctors' organizations, the hospital organizations, the nurses' organizations, they're with the democrats on this. they think while not perfect by any means, vote yes in favor of health care reform. >> yeah. it's hard to sort of use a big, broad brush to sort of talk about all doctors and all health care professionals. some of the organizations including some of the specialty organizations, american college of surgeons for example, 75,000 members, are against it and they've outlined their reasons, sent letters to nancy pelosi, and to harry reid, but, yeah, the ama which has gone back and forth as you know, wolf, first they were very much for it, then there was some concern and then they're for it on the end as you know, but it's been i think hard to categorize them as well. >> stand by, guys. we'll continue our coverage. the votes are beginning on the floor of the house of representatives. we'll update you on what's going on in this important day right after this.