luckily, president obama didn't have to bid each good-bye individually too. thanks to all of you for being part of my program this week. i will see you next week. stay tuned for "reliable sources." behind the podium. from driving the administration's message to doing battle in the briefing room. robert gibbs is the president's point man. why does his boss keep ripping cable chatter and rush and sean and glenn. our conversation at the white house. in search of oprah. kitty kelley takes on the talk show queen and says much of the media is afraid to challenge her. is the author's new and gossipy biography fair? second act. conan o'brien going from the "tonight show" to basic cable? is that a smart move? plus, charging for tweets. will corporate advertising ruin twitter?

a major chunk of washington journalism is filled in through the prism of the white house, which is why you see so many reporters standing right here on the north lawn. and a good bit of that coverage involves the man whose job it is to deal with the media. as anyone who's ever watched robert gibbs in the briefing room well knows that can get pretty contentious. >> didn't expect to have this package within a party about the public option? >> again, contrived almost entirely by you guys. >> with all due respect, and i sympathize with you trying to explain the vice president's comments, but that's not even remotely close to what he said. he was asked about if a member of his family said -- >> i understand what he said, and i'm telling you what he meant to say. >> gibbs is the man who speaks for president obama. a longtime adviser which must come up with what his boss derives as the speeded up and media culture. i sat down with him right across the alley from the white house. robert gibbs, welcome. >> how are you?

>> excellent. what do you make of all the media speculation about who the president will pick for the supreme court? you've got your front runner, elena kagan, your short list, your medium list. what do you think? >> well, i think there is a space between the announcement of that retirement until the introduction of the president's pick that has to be filled and it will take up a lot of column inches and a lot of airtime between now and then. >> you float some trial balloons here at the white house, that's been known to happen. >> we have -- we have -- we have certainly given people a sense of the size of a perspective list. i think this president, obviously, we have names that were not picked that the president looked at for the opening a year ago -- >> last time, right, but i've described this accurately as the president looking at a number of nominees, not just ones that were looked at last time, but we'll give him a lot of choices.

>> apparently so are we. president obama regularly takes jabs as the news business. he seems to enjoy tweaking those of us, especially in cable news. here he is with matt lauer. >> i haven't noticed that at all. >> it gets spun up with the way the media covers politics, the 24/7 news cycle and the cable chart and the talk radio and the internet and the blogs. all of which tend to feed the most extreme sides of any issue. >> now, this amuses me, because you guys play the game. you put people out on the shows, you talk to bloggers, you have anchors and correspondents in for off the record lunches, so you're a willing participant in that news cycle. >> well, you either have to participate in it or you're at the mercy of it. i will say, i'm always amused when i turn on the television and two people are at the same location, but in boxes that make it appear as if somehow they don't just not subscribe to what the other one believes, but they're physically separated

from any common viewpoint. >> the hollywood squares. >> i think the president believes, having traveled around this country for so long now, that there's far more that unites us than divides us. that the truth is, what makes really good television are not two people that are at the end of a four or five-minute segment are going to come to an agreement, but at the end of a four or five-minute segment are maybe 30 seconds away from doing each other bodily harm. f >> how much cable news does the president watch? >> very little. >> how does he know how bad it is? >> you don't have to watch much of it to watch -- to watch the worldwide wrestling impact of how issues are bandered around. >> he is right in some of his criticism about a lot of the chatter and debate being pointless and partisan, but i kind of get the impression that what really bugs him is the cable chatter that the white house doesn't like. guys don't complain about msnbc, whose opinion --

>> well, i don't -- i think if you were to talk to individual hosts at msnbc, you would know that we've been on the other end of many of those phone calls. i don't -- look, again, i think it's -- i think it's when you take an issue that's as important as many that we're dealing with, again, and boil it down to a 2 1/2 or a four-minute segment where people yell at each other, i'm not entirely sure what that does for people that watch -- maybe that's why, quite frankly, less people are watching. >> well, that is true. >> i would say this too. >> a lot of people watching fox, though. >> i would say -- >> let me ask you about fox. the white house campaign against fox news. d did that end when fox's news bret bear was invited in? >> i'll let fox determine whether or not they got out of that interview what they wanted to get out i have based on the fact that -- i think the uniqueness of having an interview with the president is

getting to sit as close as we are and having that insight. this is the last interview the president did before something as historic as health care passed. i don't think historians will look back and think, we really got a look of what the president was thinking. >> but has the white house moved on from criticism of fox? >> we live in the town in which you have to play the game and we're happy to put guests on, happy to do interviews. obviously, i take questions from their correspondent each and every day in the briefing. i don't think many people have to watch fox to understand the political slant that they have. >> in their news coverage as well as their opinion shows? >> here's a good example. the president signed the stark treaty last week and there was a lot of debate about whether us reducing our nuclear warheads was making this country less safe. and then the anchor disappeared

and for several seconds, there was a 1960s video footage of a nuclear test and a mushroom cloud. now, what you didn't see was, you didn't see in any of that where the last time we're particular with seeing pictures of start treaties being signed are that of ronald reagan, or when the president makes a pledge to end nuclear weapons on our planet -- >> reagan did the same thing. >> so i think in that case, you are, and you've mentioned that their increase in cable numbers, they're feeding an audience that they know wants to see and hear a certain side of that argument. >> and speaking of detractors of this administration, barack obama, on several occasions, has called out by name rush limbaugh, glenn beck, sean hannity. doesn't he elevate their stature when he does that? >> well, their stature is largely evaluated by the people who listen. again, it's one of those things where if you're not -- you have,

in all, i think in a lot of different phases of the media, people can make statements that aren't checked, right? the media in some cases covers the food fight, but doesn't necessarily check who started it and whether they started it for a reason that was legitimate or not. >> so you want more fact checking, more accountability? >> well, i think you -- i think instead of covering the food fight, covering whether or not when people say is, in fact, right or wrong. >> on that point -- on the that point, i gragree with you. president obama has not held a full-scale news conference since last july. and i know your stock answer, >> howard, what did you -- here's my question for you, what do you think he did last tuesday afternoon at the nuclear security summit? >> he took some questions. >> he took some questions. how many questions? >> you tell me. >> he took eight questions for probably half an hour.

>> okay. what would you consider what he did in february when he went into the briefing room and took -- i'll help you out on that one, six or seven questions. >> a mini news conference. but, look, clearly from the first six months of the term, where you were having a number of prime-time news conferences, and i know the president said he was overexposed then -- >> he wasn't, but -- >> you guys have pulled back from that particular format and decided it's not in your interest to have that many -- >> howard, if it's not in my interest, why did i have the president take eight questions from eight different news outlets -- and when i say eight questions, in some ways, i'm being charitable, because if you watch any of the questions, there's two or three at a time. so the notion that -- this president has done more interviews, more town hall meetings, where he takes questions from everyday people. and i'll tell you this, howard, i'm in my seventh year of working for him as a state senator, as a senate candidate, as a u.s. senator, as a presidential candidate, and now as president. there hasn't been one time in

the 500 or 1,000 times that we've done town hall meetings that i've ever known what somebody wanted to ask and when they wanted to ask it. so this president has taken questions through countless interviews, through answering questions through the media -- >> i'm not arguing that he's not accessible to the media. just making the point about the news conferences. but i appreciate your pushback. >> i think this is a great arbitrary washington measure of -- >> how accessible a president is. >> but it isn't. i don't know if you would consider talking to scott wilson at t"the washington post" -- >> i think all of those interviews are important, but i think there's a hunger for more press conferences. let's move on and ask you about the art of the leak. a couple weeks ago "the new york times" had a front page story about the president about to announce the next day about a new policy on offshore oil drilling. on conditions that they not be

identified. that's what i would call an authorized leak. why is it in the white house's interest to leak a story before he makes the announcement? >> it's interesting, because we talk about the news cycle, and if you think about it what it used to be 10 years ago or 15 years ago, you would say the news cycle lasted, you know, several hours, six hours, eight hours. the news cycle now is continuous. right? every reporter, quite honestly, is a wire reporter, because immediately their copy goes up on the internet. >> and we all blog. >> right. and twitter and all that sort of thing. >> so you need to get out ahead of that cycle? >> this thing, the news cycle starts at 5:00 a.m. in the morning. it lasts probably until 10:00 or 11:00 at night. it sleeps only a little bit before it all starts again. and on occasion, we want to get ahead of what the news is going to be that day by letting folks know. i will say this, you know, we had a discussion with the white

house correspondents earlier in the year about the use of background sources. and i offered the correspondents' association, i said, let's end background. right? we won't do background, you don't do background. >> and the reaction? >> the specific offer was, if you've got a background source, one, you should put them on the record, and if you're not going to put them on the record, them have somebody at the white house -- >> give them an on the record response to what they have to say. >> give them an opportunity to say if that is or is not true and we'll attach our name to it. >> is that because you don't like -- look, we just talked about an authorized leak, but every single day there are leaks. senior administration officials say this, that, and the other thing about internal meetings, what did rahm said, axelrod say about advice to the president. you don't like those stories? >> mostly because it's because of people that didn't win an argument -- >> right. >> -- in a policy discussion

where the president made a different decision and then they want to find some way to litigate it in the media. now, i'm fine with that. >> we have the cameras rolling, but don't you ever speak to cameras in the background? >> absolutely. but i've offered to end it. but it's got to be a two-way street. like i said, i'm happy to -- if somebody feels to passionately about an argument that they just lost that they want to call somebody at "the washington post" up, why would they not use their name? >> because they don't want to be identified. >> but, again -- >> so you think we -- you think journalists shouldn't accept that? >> i think what we can all do is do better. and i think we can all put what we want to say to the american people and the news media all on the record. >> back live in the studio. more of my one on one with robert gibbs in a moment, including why he says press briefings get so contentious. and his newest love affair, twitter. when i grow up,

i want to fix up old houses. ♪ [ woman ] when i grow up, i want to take him on his first flight. i want to run a marathon. i'm going to work with kids. i'm going to own my own restaurant. when i grow up, i'm going to start a band. [ female announcer ] at aarp we believe you're never done growing. thanks, mom. i just want to get my car back. [ female announcer ] together we can discover the best of what's next at aarp.org. but it can't have... can't have about half a i assure you it does. i can only taste... only taste the crunchy clusters, honey, and brown sugar. no madam, i don't have esp. (announcer) fiber one. cardboard no. delicious yes. so, at national, i go right past the counter... and you get to choose any car in the aisle.

choose any car? you cannot be serious! okay. seriously, you choose. go national. go like a pro.

more now with my sit-down at the old executive office building with robert gibbs. when you're in the briefing room and just getting hammered by reporters on whatever's the hot issue of the day, it seems you have about 57 ways of not answering the question. you'll tell a joke, give a very long answer, say, i'll get back to you on that.

i sometimes get the impression that you don't like to make news at these briefings. >> no, i think, i will tell you, howard, i spent a lot of time thinking -- not a lot of time, i've spent some tile thinking, i wonder what the briefings would be like if it really wasn't a cable tv show. >> if it was mike mccurry who let the cameras in. >> and i think mike would be the first one to tell you, it was both the best and the worst decision that he ever made. >> so you think the correspondents are playing to the cameras? >> i think we all are. i'm not absolving myself from that. >> right. >> but i think -- >> but sometimes there are perfectly straightforward questions not necessarily asked with a whole lot of flam buoyance that you sort of dance around and you see that as your job. >> if i give a longer answer, it's my hope to give a broader set of context to what may or may not be being asked. >> and you know that 20 seconds of that, at most, might get used on an evening newscast.

>> but i think there are people that will watch the whole briefing or will read the transcript of the briefing. and i think, again, what's important is, there are so many issues that we're dealing with that are hard to boil down to 20 seconds. >> financial regulation. not a 20-second -- >> exactly. and that's why, you know, one of the things that we're trying to do more of is bring folks like we did with secretary geithner, bring them into the briefing room to talk directly to the white house press corps about the issues that we're working on on financial reform, what are our bottom lines, but i do wonder, again i wonder at times what it would be like if we turned the cameras off and we could just have a discussion -- i sometimes joke that i know when somebody thinks they have a good question, because when i walk in, they've already got their makeup. >> i think the networks wouldn't cotton to that suggest, but i take your point. before i let you go, you recently joined twitter.

and i've got to tell you, at first you were kind of boring. kind of putting out the talking points and linking to articles, but lately you seem like you've gotten into it and you even weeted about an 18-mile bike ride. >> i needed some advice on how to -- on some biking. >> what do you get out of being on twitter? >> well, i got on twitter the president -- i hesitate to call it a news conference, because i don't want to -- >> when the president did his mini news conference in february, there are the seats along the wall that normally my deputies sit in when i'm up there. so i sat in one of these seats -- >> and they're all -- >> right. bill burton had his laptop and twitter up. and to me, it was fascinating, because i'm watching the white house press corps sitting 10 or 15 feet away from me, reacting to and responding to the questions that were asked and the answers that the president

were giving. >> so you're getting a realtime glimpse of what was going on in their heads. >> it, to me, was fascinating. and i thought it was an amazing tool to know, okay, i mean, it's my job to know what is important to reporters. and this was, to me, a great immediate yomedium to do that. i also think it's a fabulous medium to communicate with not just the white house press corps, but tens of thousands of people that want to know what the president is doing or a picture of who he met with and i found it to be fascinating. >> but, of course, instead of being in the 24-hour news cycle, you're now in the 24-second news cycle on twitter. >> well, it takes an amazing amount of discipline to write out all of what you want to say in 140 characters or less. if you ever -- if you ever watch me do it, it takes me a few minutes to sort of edit even myself down. i just think it's a fascinating, fast-moving medium. i am trying to do a little

bit -- i'm balancing the fact that it is a -- it's a white house -- it's an official white house account with also sharing -- >> your own person -- >> right, some sort of interesting things. >> you're the first white house press secretary to have to communicate in 140 characters. >> it's a great challenge. but it's -- i tell you, it's a lot of fun. >> robert gibbs, thanks very much for sitting down with us today. >> thank you. >> after that interview, gibbs tweeted that he had gone kayaking. now, we don't yet have a supreme court nominee, as gibbs and i discussed, but the white house denounced cbs news this week for a report on one leading contender, solicitor general, elena kagan. the cbs website reprinted a column by conservative blogger ben come niche saying that kagan would become, quote, the first openly gay justice. administration officials, speaking on background, say kagan isn't gay, and when cbs refused to delete the posing, anita dunn told me the network was posting lies. cbs news.com eventually killed

the column and the network and comeich apologized. and coming up, outing oprah, kitty kelley takes on the queen of daytime in her latest controversial celebrity biography. plus, courting conan. the late-night funny man moving to basic cable. is this a giant step down for the comic who once held forth on "the tonight show"? determine if a car is a best buy? first they drive it in the real world. and put it through its paces. they rate its fit and finish. and the amenities inside. they factor in purchase price and operating costs, fuel economy and resale value. in short, they do what you do to test its quality. the consumers digest best buys from chevy. put them to your own test. and may the best car win.

can i eat heart healthy without giving up taste? a man can only try... and try...and try. [ male announcer ] honey nut cheerios tastes great and can help lower cholesterol. bee happy. bee healthy.

oprah is a billionaire who sits atop a sizable media empire. syndicated talk show, production company, "o" magazine, and the forthcoming oprah winfrey network, but she keeps her distance from most ordinary journalists, granting few interviews these days and using her mini platforms to shape and control her image. >> this has been very embarrassing to me and i deeply regret leaving the impression that i did from the larry king show that the truth doesn't matter, because it does. >> so i wanted to do for these girls what my father did for me, because at 14 years old, i was headed for detention home, kicked out of my mother's house, and the detention home was filled and so i was -- she said, you can't stay in my house another day. >> season 25 will be the last

season of "the oprah winfrey show". >> now a celebrity biographer is presenting a somewhat different picture of oprah. kitty kelley who has done books on jackie o., elizabeth taylor, frank sinatra, nancy reagan, the bush family, and the british royals is out this week with her 500-page take on the talk show queen. and kitty kelley joins me now in the studio to talk about the book called "oprah: a biography" and it's already stirring controversy. welcome. >> hi, howie. >> you say that lots of major tv programs have refused to have you on to talk about this book because oprah is such a powerful figure, but you were on the "today" show this week. >> exactly. the broadcasting boycott has really been overplayed, i think, by the media. >> you've talked about it. you said barbara walters, larry king won't have me on. >> several. >> how do you know that they're intimidated by oprah winfrey? >> well, because their producers said to the publisher that they just couldn't afford to rupture their relations with oprah.

but you're right, certainly not the "today" show, certainly not fox news, and certainly not cnn. i've had a lot -- >> larry king says he hasn't talked to you in five years, so he wouldn't have been involved in the decision. >> oh, indeed. he was asked to book this show, but he said he just couldn't do it because of hoprah -- >> well, his producers were asked to book the show -- >> well, right, when i say "they said," i mean the producers. >> i want to talk about a question matt lauer asked you. let's play that and we'll talk about it on the other side. >> in your opinion, kitty, when someone in this society accepts the mantle of celebrity, to whatever degree, great celebrity, minor celebrity, do they give up the right to hold some things as personal? >> no, i don't think so. in oprah's case, though, she has put it out there. >> you don't put very much, if at all, offlimits in this book

about oprah. >> no, i don't. and i -- on the question that matt lauer offered about privacy, legally, there is no privacy and journalistically for celebrities, as he said, who accepts the mantle of celebrity, it sounds like it comes down from god. >> well, she's a huge cultural figure. >> a huge figure. >> but doesn't hold any public office. so why would you -- >> i'll tell you why. because oprah has such influence in this culture. she has more influence on our lives, possibly, than the government. think about it. oprah tells us -- she tells us how to live our best lives. she tells her viewers every single day, who they can -- who they should vote for, politicians they should vote for, charities they should contribute to, causes they should support, what medicines to take, what surgeries to have -- >> she gets her fingers in a lot of things.

i don't think until barack -- >> but those of us who really follow her and embrace her, we need an understanding of this woman. >> fair enough. i don't think until barack obama, she told us which politicians to support. but you get into all this speculation about her sexual orientation, her relationship with gayle king. why go there? >> because when you're doing a biography, you want the total picture. and sexuality is very much a part of it. >> you were not able to answer that question? you raised it -- >> i didn't set out to -- there's a great deal of speculation about oprah's sexuality because she brought it up. she issued a press release years ago when she went on ellen degeneres' show to play the therapist when ellen was going to make television history and come out as a lesbian. and oprah got a lot of feedback from that. she issued a press release, an official statement saying, i am not gay, i'm not coming out of the closet, i am not a lesbian. in that time, she brought --

this is a woman who's been engaged to stedman graham since 1992, and will probably never marry him, at least according to what her father told me, and she travels and is seen more frequently with gayle king. it is not a question that came from me, it is a question that is raised frequently. >> an elephant in the room. >> the elephant in the room. >> i know you compiled all of oprah winfrey's many interviews over the years, but how hard was it to report this book without her cooperation and many of those who were closest to her? >> i interviewed about 850 people over a period of four years to write this book. and surprisingly, most of my sources are on the record. they range from phil donohue, gloria steinem, a former supreme court justice, sandrad day o'connor, who adored oprah. >> i saw that. you do have a lot of people on the record.

>> well, i try and name every single person. i mean, when i wrote the frank sinatra book more than 20 years ago, i thought, i'm putting every single person on the record. can't do it. you simply can't do it, because people sometimes put their jobs in danger, employees who talk to me who have worked for oprah in the past and a couple that work for her now stepped forward to talk to me. they did it under real legal pressure. these people have signed confidentiality agreements never to talk and oprah, she's even got her magazine, people that work and are associated with her magazine, few magazines in this country bind their employees to confidentiality agreements. >> you told the story in the book, about 20 years ago, that the "new yorker" magazine wanted the novelest erica john to profile oprah, they had a friendly relationship. and erica john told you she did not want anyone writing about her, especially a white woman for a white publication.

and she said, oprah winfrey, i don't need a white magazine to cannonize me. what do you make of that? >> in the book, she'd gotten hammered by barbara harrison in "the new york times" sunday magazine, and i think she was responding to that. she has really never gotten over that interview, and howie, you've got to understand that for the last 25 years, oprah has really, for the most part, had halo coverage. and so when barbara harrison came out with this piece in "the new york times" sunday magazine, oprah was incensed. >> do you think the press has been overall, i mean, she's a major, wealthy, self-made woman, do you think the press overall has been too soft on her? >> no. >> you said "halo coverage." >> she has had halo coverage. >> why does anybody in our society get halo coverage? >> i wonder. i wonder, howie. >> well, she -- some of the things that people have said about your book, that oprah herself has talked about her

sexual abuse, the child he gave birth to at 15 that didn't live, her weight issues and all of that. she's opened up a lot of these areas of inquiry, so that makes it harder for a biographer, i would think, to unearth more that's new. >> i don't think that's a biographer's job, really, to unearth more that is new. i think there is a lot in this book that is new, but i don't think when you set out to give the totality of somebody's life, you're necessarily looking for something new. when i went to interview her aunt katherine in mississippi, i had no idea that bernon winfrey was not her biological father. but what i did know by that time is that oprah lives a life cloaked in secrecy and i found myself as the biographer getting sucked into the secrets. >> kitty kelley, good luck with the book. thanks very much for coming in this sunday morning. >> thank you, howie. up next, the show must go on. conan o'brien taking his act to tbs. is this a troubling sign for the big broadcast networks?

they've served for decades as a golden, tasty sidekick to the all-american meal. french fries, and our national passion for them, are legendary. classic. iconic. but times change. and people want better foods. so cargill helped a restaurant chain create a zero-trans fat cooking oil for their french fries. using select canola plants and inovative processing techniques while preserving their famous taste. because no one wants to give up a classic. this is how cargill works with customers.

it was the pinnacle of any comedian's career, but conan o'brien didn't get to savor it for long. in what became something of a national spectator sport, he got

into a feud with man he had replaced at "the tonight show". >> you can do anything you want in life. yeah. yeah, unless jay leno wants to do it too. >> you know the rest. nbc brought leno back to "the tonight show" from his prime-time debacle. conan walked with a $33 million settlement. and everyone figured he would go to fox. but this week came the surprise announcement, conan o'brien had signed with tbs. tbs owned by cnn's parent company, time warner, hadn't been on anybody's radar. conan put it this way. in three months, i've gone from network television to twitter to performing live in theaters and now i'm headed to basic cable. my plan the working perfectly. joining us now to talk about whether this move makes sense and whether it signals a cultural shift away from the big broadcast networks. in new york, rachael sklar, editor at large at mediaite.com. and in kansas city, erin

barnhart, television critic for "the kansas city star." erin barnhart, at first glance, this seems like a big comedown for conan after "the tonight show." >> actually, i didn't follow any of the insider gossip, so i was as surprised as anybody, and yet the minute they announced it, it sounded terrific. it just sounded like a home run. but to get inside why it works, i think you have to understand some of the ironies here. he gets to move to 11:00, with the earliest he's ever been on in late-night, and yet he arguably will be doing edgier material than he did at 12:35 at nbc. he's now doing a program where he's giving up a lot of his audience because cable audiences are traditionally smaller, but it's going to be more advertiser friendly. so it's actually going to raise his profile. and you know what, at the end of the day, he may actually be able to grab that crown that he dreamed of all along his 17-year journey here. >> we'll see about that. >> and that's the king of late

night. >> you said, raise his profile and tbs aren't usually used in the same sentence. rachael, do you see a benefit to conan o'brien in not having to chase a mass audience? >> sure. conan can invent his own ticket here at tbs. and i think crucially what this deal shows is conan gets ownership of his show, and, you know, the potential of launching other properties. i think, you know, i think what this new media world has shown is you have to go to where your audience is. you can't just expect them to come to you at the vaunted appointed hour the way things always were. because there are more choices now and more platforms. the way conan described how his plan is working perfectly is actually evidence of how he's operating intelligently for this new media space because he's adapting. >> and big on twitter. so aaron barnhart, does this signify he couldn't go to fox because he couldn't make the deal, but does this signify for this kind of entertainer that

the broadcast channels are now old hat and cable is the new hot destination? >> the late-night market has changed a lot since cbs poured out all those millions of dollars to lure david letterman over to do an 11:35 show for them. the margins are smaller. i don't think i buy nbc's line that conan o'brien was actually losing money for them. i think that was some of that famous hollywood accounting we hear from. >> but leno's audience is now bigger. not as big as it once was before the debacle, but bigger than what conan had been drawing. >> yeah, but the problem now that nbc has is that jay leno is back and his audience is not bigger than it was before and it's getting older. in fact, it's ageing more rapidly than it would have, i think, if he had just stayed on and not had this mess. and that's going to raise a big issue for nbc in three or four years when it comes to time to renegotiate jay leno's deal. >> nbc only thinks in terms of five years ago. >> but rachael, there was a lot of talk on this program and elsewhere during that whole soap

oprah about how leno was coming off as the bad guy because he was coming back after giving up "the tonight show" throne and squeezing conan out of his 11:35 time is isn't conan basically doing the same thing to tbs. george lopez had been on at that hour and he's agreed to go an hour later to make room for conan. it's a business. >> well, you know, they've all made a very big point of saying that conan absolutely would not have quote/unquote lenoed another comedian. george lopez called him to say he thinks it was a great idea. everybody thinks it's a great requested. >> don't unique that's just spin? >> i think it could be pr spin, but i think what conan really gained from that whole situation that happened was real authenticity. and i think that he's brought that here. joe adlai said something that was very intelligent. he said that talent at the end of the day wants to go where it's loved and wanted. and, you know, jay leno said

through wthis whole thing, hey, it's just a business. well, people of that caliber talent, they want to go where they can love their work and work with people that appreciate them. >> and that's the big advantage that cable tv has never network. network, at the end of the day, still with its lower audience numbers, has to please a much bigger crowd than cable ever has to. look at what conan is coming into. he's going to follow "family guy" and "the office." you couldn't ask for a better audience than the lead-in he's going to get from those two shows. if he would have been hat fox, who knows what his lead-in would have been. >> a rather dramatic development at fox news where sean hannity was yanked back by fox executive. he was going to do his program in cincinnati before a live audience. we've seen him out on the road appearing with sarah palin and michele bachmann before these live audiences. but this was a tea party event where the tea party organizers were charging as much as $100 for tickets. that was too much for fox

executives and hannity was flown back on his private jet, to be sure, to new york. the plans for that show were canceled. and i think this was a good move by fox kpeexecutives. it seems to have given hannity and other hosts a loose rein. they now plan to keep a tighter reino on hannity and others. it was interesting and we wanted to share it with you. aaron barnhart and rachael sklar, thanks very much for joining us to talk about the late-night wars, which i'm sure we'll talk about more once conan makes his debut. coming up next, the sound of sunday. wow, is this... fiber one honey clusters? yes. but it can't have... can't have about half a i assure you it does. i can only taste... only taste the crunchy clusters, honey, and brown sugar. no madam, i don't have esp. (announcer) fiber one. cardboard no. delicious yes. ♪

[ male announcer ] of all the things being said about our cars... the most important is what comes from you. if you are shopping for a new car, we invite you to put ours to the test. put us up against anyone. and may the best car win.

joining us now for a look at what's been happening on the other sunday talk shows, here's candy crowley. the debate over the administration's financial reform bill really heating up this week. what have tim geithner and mitch mcconnell saying about the question of whether there will be future bank bailouts. >> first of all, turn the page. it's not the public option any more they're arguing about on health care, it is this liquidation fund.

senator mcconnell has said all week long this is a bailout. this is yet another bailout, endless bailouts. and the democrats have been pushing back. and the president set on his saturday radio show, you know, the republican leader is being deceitful, so that's where we start the recent war of words. >> he ought to talk to his own treasury secretary, who agrees with me as well as the "washington post" and "the wall street journal" that there is a bailout fund in the bill that was reported out of the banking committee. >> but that bailout is funded by the banks themselves, is it not? it's not a taxpayer bailout. >> well, robert reich, bill clinton's secretary of labor, says it's a bailout fund. regardless of how the money is proud, it is a bailout fund that sort of guarantees in perpetuity that we'll be intervening once again to bail out these big firms. >> that's absolutely not true and some of his members say it was a bit over the top.

i have spent a lot of time with the republicans over the last several weeks and i believe that we are very close on this. that we agree on the vast bulk of the things necessary for too big to fail and that's one reason i'm so confident. >> of course one of the things that we found with health care reform was that we heard a lot of republicans, democrats saying well, we agree on a lot of things but in the end it's that final 10 or 20% that gets them. >> the republicans are saying start over. >> exactly. it all has an echo. let me ask you about florida governor charlie crist. he started out with a huge lead in his race for the senate and is now trailing by something like 30 points. there is chatter that he drop out and run as an independent. he hasn't flatly denied that. what's the latest this sunday morning? >> the governor has just tanked. he has tanked. marco rubio, who is a tea-party backed candidate, more conservative than kris. kris is just getting his head handed to him and he has signed a bill very unpopular with

republicans in florida. >> he voe toed a bill. >> you're right, he sovetoed a bill. now we're seeing two people on the talk shows, mitch mcconnell and john mccain, both of whom are crist backers and you can hear them beginning to back off. take a listen. >> it looks like marco rubio is running a very effective campaign and seems to have the lead. i'm going to be there behind the republican romney, whoever that is. >> he would lose all republican support if he would run as an independent. >> i hope charlie crist will remain a republican. >> it's a fascinating snapshot of the tensions within the republican party with some people who were good republicans before. >> at least in the primary process. we'll see how this plays out but charlie crist isn't the only one getting a challenge from the right. still to come, making a buck. as the library of congress gets

every twitter ever posted. is twitter about to coming corrupted by advertising? your feedback next. i'm on an aspirin regimen now. my doctor told me it's the easiest preventative thing you can do. [ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. see your doctor. simple. a man can only try... and try...and try. [ male announcer ] honey nut cheerios tastes great and can help lower cholesterol.

bee happy. bee healthy. black one! where? [ vrrroooooomm! ] black one! where? [ vrrroooooomm! ] black one! ow! where? [ male announcer ] the volkswagen tiguan. the only compact suv with a turbocharged engine, standard. [ vrrroooooomm! ] black one! where? there. [ male announcer ] lease the 2010 tiguan for just $269 a month. it's a whole new volkswagen. i'm going to own my own restaurant. i want to be a volunteer firefighter. when i grow up, i want to write a novel. i want to go on a road trip. when i grow up, i'm going to go there. i'm going to work with kids. i want to fix up old houses. [ female announcer ] at aarp we believe you're never done growing. i want to fall in love again.

[ female announcer ] together we can discover the best of what's next at aarp.org.

twitter has become part of a bloodstream of journalism for me and countless others. its simplicity providing an ideal way of spreading the news, but the company has always wrestled with this question, how could it make any money? >> it might surprise you to learn twitter has yet to make a dime. >> but that's about to change.

the website is going to slip 140 character ads onto people's pages. these are called promoted tweets. on subjects related to what you're writing about or searching for. so along with comments from chuck todd or jake tapper or ed henry or steven colbert, you'd get a steady diet of pitches for the likes of starbucks, best buy, virgin america and bravo. well, colbert did ask biz stone if he had some kind of plan. >> are you going to make money off of this? >> yes. >> how? >> we're going to become a strong, profitable independent company. >> the move comes as some media holdouts are joining twitter's 105 million registered users and talking about it on the air. >> we're ready to go. here it is 8:58:43, it's out. yes, there it is. see. i give up, i was wrong, young and foolish. >> i'm katie couric. thanks for watching. good night. >> i asked my 24,000 followers

what they think of the new advertising policy and here are some of the responses. scott easeman, i have no issue with it. twitter is a free service. they've given us a great service. time to give back. another way to trash a good thing. it's all downhill from here. jack state fan, there are already a lot of sell-promoting selling tweets on here already. that's true. people like to promote themselves. the former bush white house spokesman, nah, i kind of like the sponsored tweets, fun. trying to determine what the tweet ads say about me. look, if that's the price of staying in business, i want to make sure that i can keep on tweeting. more important, reading the tweets of lots of interesting people from all walks of life. after all, it's twitter, at least the ads will be short. that's it for this edition of "the reliable sources." join us again next sunday morning at 11:00 a.m. eastern for another critical look at the