to it. >> i'm so glad we're able to meet and the fact that you're wonderful people is a big bonus. >> gary and tony have a baby is on tomorrow night at 8:00 p.m. that does it for "360." thank you very much for watching. larry king starts right now. >> larry: tonight, disgraced general stanley mcchrystal, the man running the war in afghanistan, is abruptly fired by president obama. >> today i accepted general stanley mcchrystal's resignation as commander of the international security assistance force in afghanistan. low pressure >> the journalist who brought him down is here for his first on-camera interview. who gave him access to a four-star commander in the middle of a war? did mcchrystal forget he was talking to a reporter? did the journalist know that his bombshell story was going to blow a military career? next on "larry king live."

>> larry: good evening. michael hastings is a contributor to "rolling stone" magazine. he's author of the article the runaway general. that article will be out on the magazine stands friday. it led to general mcchrystal's resignation. he's also written "i lost my love in baghdad." this is his first on-camera interview about the uproar that his piece has caused. president obama has nominated us, the u.s. central command general, david petraeus, to replace general stanley mcchrystal as the top commander in afghanistan. let's take a look at the president's remarks earlier today. then we'll talk with michael. watch. >> but war is bigger than any one man or woman, whether a private, a general or a president. as difficult as it is to lose

general mcchrystal, i believe that it is the right decision for our national security. the conduct represented in the recently published article does not meet the standard that should be set by a commanding general. >> larry: all right, michael hastings, the obvious first question is, how did you get this? how did you get access? how did you get this whole thing done? >> when my editors and i at "rolling stone" came up with the idea to do a profile of general mcchrystal, i simply just e-mailed general mcchrystal's press staff, said we wanted to do a profile, and said if you could give us anytime to hang out with the general that would be great. i was expecting actually no access or perhaps, you know, one or two days or 45-minute interview. when the response was, hey, why don't you come over to paris when we're going on a nato trip, you can join us next week, see the general, meet him, and

then come to kabul a few weeks after that to see him in the war zone, kind of a different sort of spin or a different twist on the normal profiles. but then what happened was -- >> larry: why do you -- >> -- while i was in paris, the volcano in iceland exploded and so i ended up getting stuck with the general and his staff. >> larry: why do you think they did it? i mean, we know that "rolling stone" is a kind of a left wing magazine. they are not exactly on the left side of the political spectrum. why did they let it happen? >> i think one of the main reasons was they wanted to reach a different demographic than they had from the other profiles. a number of young officers read "rolling stone." i think by featuring general mcchrystal in the magazine like that they would reach an audience they normally wouldn't reach. >> larry: when you finished the article and you knew it was going to be published, did you

know that an uproar was coming? >> i knew that there would probably be some sort of response. my sort of thinking was maybe they'll be one or two or three days. maybe it will create somewhat of a headache for general mcchrystal's staff. they in the past had had much worse -- or at least had seemed to have gone through much worse sort of cycles in the media. but i had no expectation that general mcchrystal would lose his job after the piece. >> larry: most of the quotes are staff quotes, correct? i read the piece. it's brilliantly written by the way. there's very little mcchrystal quotes to you. >> i would somewhat disagree with that.

i think his voice is reflected in the piece throughout at appropriate times. i would also like to point out the staff quotes are a very good reflection of general mcchrystal's thinking on the number of issues i addressed. >> larry: in retrospect, michael, do you think the president made the right decision today? >> i really don't -- you know, my goal as a journalist is to write the best story possible, to write the most accurate story possibility, to sort of give the readers an idea of what's really going on. that's my focus. whether or not president obama made the right decision to change leaders -- i'm not really sure i'm the best person to answer that question. i will say, though, that if the white house wanted to sweep this under the rug and keep general mcchrystal, they could have easily done that. they could have -- there's a number of ways they could have swept this under the rug. so i think actually their

response confirms what i wrote in the story, which is the relationship between general mcchrystal and the white house was obviously fraught with tension. >> larry: all right. is there a part of you that's feeling a little sad for the general? >> well, obviously general mcchrystal is a very impressive individual in many ways. i write about that in the story. he's a great warrior so to speak. he's the kind of person you actually do want out there fighting, you know, wars on behalf of the united states. i think the problem becomes in my view is when guys like general mcchrystal who spent their last nine years fighting these wars and they've made huge sacrifices to fight these wars, unimaginable sacrifices. general mcchrystal himself would only see his wife i think less than 30 days a year for 5 out of the last 7 years. but i think when war becomes your life, i think it's very difficult to have the proper perspective to be able to create a fully balanced policy.

i think that's what's happened here. the policy between the military side of the strategy in afghanistan and the diplomatic side is totally out of whack and general mcchrystal sort of controlled both of them. >> larry: all right. the general issued a statement. i'll read a portion of it. the president accepted my resignation as commander of u.s. and nato coalition forces in afghanistan. the president's strategy in afghanistan, i'm deeply committed to our coalition forces, our partner nations and the afghan people. it was out of respect for this commitment and a desire to see the mission succeed that i tendered my resignation. what do you think is going to happen to him now, michael? >> i'm not sure. i think -- as i said, i think general mcchrystal is the type of individual you want in the u.s. military. so i'm sure if he wants to stay, they will find a home for him. i know that he had talked about

after his retirement he wasn't going to go into politics, he was going to open a book shop, you know, somewhere, you know, in some rural town, so perhaps he'll have had enough of the rough and tumble life that -- this sort of high-wire life that is being a general that is being a high-level, very famous politician, and decide to call it quits. but i would also think that if he wants to stay in the military, there would be a home for him very easily. >> larry: we'll ask if anything was left out of the article when we come back. and then a panel will join us. and michael will hang around too. don't go away. it's pain relief without the pills.

no pills, no pain. how can you get pain relief without taking pills around the clock? try thermacare heatwraps, for all day relief without pills. i was surprised, thermacare worked all day. you feel the heat. and it relaxes and unlocks the muscle. you've got to try it. [ man ] thermacare, more effective for back pain than the maximum dose of acetaminophen, the medicine in tylenol. go to thermacare.com today for a $3 off coupon. thermacare. no pills. no pain. just relief.

thermacare. [droplets] don't fix the leak. or anything in the house... without blueprint from chase. create a plan to pay off large purchases... and save money on interest. does your credit card have blueprint? design your plan at 866 blueprint. you have heel pressure. huh? you have high arches. really? (announcer) people everywhere are discovering what's really going on with their feet. you have flat feet. i do? (announcer) foot care scientists are behind dr. scholl's custom fit orthotic center. as flat as kansas, sir. that's flat. whoa! (announcer) its unique foot mapping technology identifies the areas you put the most pressure on. then recommends the custom fit orthotic that's best for your feet. for customized comfort all day long. for locations, see drscholls.com.

but, i'm a home. i'm always outside. i make being inside possible. look, do me a favor. get flood insurance. floods can devastate your home. fred, how you doing over there? i think this is gonna be a problem. see what i mean? hey, i know what i'm talking about. because i'm a home people. and, there's no place like me. [ female announcer ] only flood insurance covers floods. for a free brochure, call the number on your screen. >> larry: do you think your brother was killed?

>> larry: joan rivers here tomorrow night. jermaine jackson on friday. go to facebook.com/cnnlarrykinglive. for behind the scene photos of jermaine and me honoring the memory of michael on his first anniversary of his death. michael hastings is with us from kabul, afghanistan. he's the author of the article in "rolling stone." anything you left out? anything you're sorry about? >> no, i think i did my job to the best of my ability. obviously, in the magazine story, there's always tons you leave out. so -- but in terms of regret, certainly no regrets. >> larry: all right, we have us a couple of excerpts from the article. i ask you to comment on them. number one. according to sources, you write, familiar with the meeting,

mcchrystal thought obama looked uncomfortable and intimidated by the room full of military brass. that was -- without specifics, who told you that? >> without specifics, who told me that? >> larry: that's a cute way of asking. >> -- mcchrystal -- people very close to general mcchrystal and confirmed with a number of people very close to him. so i am very confident in my sourcing there. >> larry: on the first one-on-one meeting, you say it was a ten-minute photo op. obama clearly didn't know anything about him who he was. here's the guy who's going to run this expletive war. doesn't seem very engaged. the boss was pretty disappointed. why were they revealing this to you? >> that's a great question. i think you'll have to ask them. these quotes that --

>> larry: did you ask them? >> -- those i got -- i haven't had the time actually to reach out to too many members of his staff. but yeah, i mean, at the time it wasn't necessarily something that i was interested in asking, but i think it's, you know, what's important is that they obviously were so frustrated with the relationships they have with the white house that staffer after staffer was willing to describe that relationship. and the tensions there. if anyone wants to ask the general any other questions along those lines, ask how they felt about the fact president obama has only visited afghanistan once since becoming commander in chief. ask them about the phone call before the marjah operation that was very underwhelming to mcchrystal and his staff. you can go down the list. it's more than just, you know, what ended up making it into the

final version of the story. so i think, you know, why that -- and i think that tension has been reflected in the entire year of his command here. >> larry: all right. how much were you surprised -- two areas -- by the dislike of joe biden and the like of hillary clinton? >> i certainly wasn't surprised by the dislike of joe biden. as for the like of hillary clinton, i've covered secretary of state clinton before. i covered her during her campaign. she's a likable and charismatic person once you get the chance to spend any time close to her. she's also trying to build up her defense credentials. i know she was supportive of mcchrystal during the strategic review and assessment last year. i think if you supported them, there's a much better chance of them liking you, as opposed to, say, vice president biden who is the most vocal critic of general mcchrystal's strategy within the white house. >> larry: are you surprised at

one aide calling jim jones the national security adviser a clown? >> i wasn't too surprised by that because within the sort of washington, d.c. chattering classes, general jones, though obviously a very well-decorated military veteran, doesn't -- he doesn't have the sort of -- he's someone who takes a lot of flack within the washington, d.c. gossip circles. >> larry: is this going to change the pentagon and the press? >> it's probably very doubtful that one story will do much to change the pentagon or the press. the pentagon has a budget of $600 billion a year and the press seems pretty incorrigible in their behavior anyway. will it change the relationship between -- no, i don't know who the first journalist is who's

going to profile general petraeus in his new job as commander in afghanistan. but i can probably guess it's not going to be me, though i'd be happy to talk to him, if they talk to me. >> larry: we'll take a break. when we come back, ari fleisher will join us. the impact of the departure on the troops, the taliban, the war. michael's going to hang around too. don't go away. one word turns innovative design

into revolutionary performance. one word makes the difference between defining the mission and accomplishing the mission. one word makes the difference in defending our nation and the cause of freedom. how... is the word that makes all the difference. that's why we're investing one million dollars every hour...

to improve our technology and your safety. it's an investment that's helped toyota earn multiple top safety pick awards for 2010 by the insurance institute for highway safety. no other brand has won more. these top safety picks, and all our new safety innovations are available at toyota.com/safety.

i don't make this decision based on any difference in policy with general mcchrystal. as we are in full agreement about our strategy. nor do i make this decision out of any sense of personal insult.

stan mcchrystal has always shown great courtesy and carried out my orders faithfully. i've got great admiration for him and for his long record of service in uniform. >> larry: joining us, ari fleisher, former white house spokesman for president george bush. pete hegseth is president of vets for freedom. he's an iraqi war veteran. peter beinart is the author of "the icarus syndrome, a history of american hubris." and john soltz returns, co-founder and chair of vote vets.org. and staying with us in kabul is "rolling stone's" michael hastings, who wrote that article about general stanley mcchrystal that will be everywhere on friday. what do you make of these developments? >> shocking.

it's an end to a good career. the president did the right thing. you cannot have the military do that. in fairness, it was mostly his aides. that doesn't get the general off the hook. larry, the big question i have is who in the world approved michael getting this interview? and, you know, things like this aren't just the general's people out in the field. people at the pentagon have to sign off on this. public affairs staff at the pentagon needs to explain all of this. because i don't want those people in charge of anything serious again. when you allow a journalist especially into a bar like that for the drinking scene in the article, that's not allowing journalism to take place. that's allowing eavesdropping to take place, with all due respect to michael. >> larry: michael, did they know it was coming? >> did they know -- >> larry: did they know the gist of your story, that it was going to be rough. did they get the advance of what was coming? >> yes, i talked to an individual on the staff of

general mcchrystal's staff who deals with his press. i gave him -- i sort of indicated to him that it could be a rough couple days. but i didn't expect it was going to be as rough as it turned out to be for them. i would disagree with ari just saying i'm pretty happy with the policies they have and hope they continue them. >> larry: all right, pete, what do you make of it? vets for freedom, iraqi war veteran. pete, what's your read? >> his comments were not -- he wasn't insubordinate. it was unfortunate what his staff said. at the end of the day, he's a war hero. he's a great general. it's great to see petraeus is taking the helm. the guy who was the architect of the iraq surge. the biggers question are the sentiments behind what he said. at the end of the day, he because expressing serious frustration about the support he was receiving from the white house, about the civilian leadership, in holbrooke, and eikenberry, and about this

looming deadline that's sort of hanging around the necks of our troops of july 2011, but whether or not this policy can succeed when we're telling our enemy when we're going to leave the battlefield. basically, mcchrystal had to wait four months to meet with the president. when he did, it was a scolding session in europe on air force one. as the author said, it had been -- obama has only visited iraq once sinces the war started. is he paying the kind of attention that our generals crave for something as important as afghanistan? i think that's the frustration mcchrystal expressed that needs to be addressed by the president. >> larry: michael, the president said today they were in agreement on policy. >> yeah, yes, i think -- i mean, one of the things -- one of the sort of, in my view, positive things about this article is that it gave us a chance to sort of discuss the afghanistan policy. i think there are some serious, serious problems with it. one of the main ones being the relationship between the military and civilian side.

but i think if you read the article, it's not so much about general mcchrystal, it's about using general mcchrystal to look at some of the wider policy problems. and as the gentleman mentioned, the sort of inflammatory comments that were said, get at these very real and very serious tensions between the civilian side and military side. >> larry: we'll get the thoughts of peter beinart and when we come back. don't go away. a car that keeps going, when others might quit. a car that stands strong... when you need it most. and expects to handle the unexpected. at chevrolet, we created a team of red x engineers who are obsessed with quality. red x torture tests every car down to the smallest detail. because everyone deserves excellence. ♪ because everyone deserves excellence. [ malhis day starts thwith his arthritis pain.. that's breakfast with two pills. the morning is over, it's time for two more pills.

the day marches on, back to more pills. and when he's finally home... but hang on -- just two aleve can keep arthritis pain away all day with fewer pills than tylenol. this is steven, who chose aleve and fewer pills for a day free of pain. and get the all day pain relief of aleve in liquid gels. hey, pete. yeah, it's me, big brother. put the remote down and listen. this intervention brought to you by niaspan.

so you cut back on the cheeseburgers and stopped using your exercise bike as a coat rack. that's it? you're done? i don't think so. you told me your doctor's worried about plaque clogging your arteries - what did he call it...coronary artery disease. that cholesterol medicine he also wants you on - niaspan? i looked it up online. hey, pete, you waiting for an engraved invitation? if you have high cholesterol and coronary artery disease, and diet and exercise are not enough, niaspan, along with diet and a bile acid-binding resin, is fda-approved not only to slow down plaque buildup but to actually help clear some of it away. pete, as kids, i always looked up to you. now, i'm just trying to look after you. if you cannot afford your medication, call 1-877-niaspan. niaspan is not for everyone, like people with stomach ulcers, liver, or serious bleeding problems. severe liver damage can occur when switching to niaspan from immediate-release niacin. blood tests are needed to check for liver problems.

tell your doctor if you have muscle pain or weakness; this could be a sign of serious side effects; this risk can increase with statin use. tell your doctor about alcohol use, if you've ever had gout, or are diabetic and experience increases in blood sugar. flushing, a common side effect, is warmth, redness, itching, or tingling of the skin. ask your doctor about niaspan. fight back. fight plaque. hey. just got off the phone with a sweet gal. fender-bender. i think i got her to a good place. oh, then you'll love this. online repair monitoring. after an accident, esurance customers can get daily updates with photos of their car repairs in progress. oh that's great. [ chuckles ] thank you. [ chuckles ] that's really great. thanks. i mean, really, great. chad i don't want to talk about feelings. sure you do. [ male announcer ] go to esurance.com or call today. >> larry: all right, peter beinart, author of the new book "the icarus syndrome," what's

your read on these incredible developments today and the article by mr. hastings? >> i think the critical issue is the one your guests just got to. which is president obama said this flap has nothing to do with the disagreement over policy. if you read michael hastings' remarkable article, it's very clear that is not the case. in fact, there is a fundamental difference between mcchrystal's desire for an all-in counterinsurgency campaign with as much money and as many years as it will take and barack obama's clear desire to put limits on our intervention in afghanistan. and all of these small things about obama not paying enough attention, that's really ultimately i think goes to this root question, which is obama is trying to limit this war because he sees a larger strategic picture in which the united states is going deeper and deeper into debt and needs to focus on other things and mcchrystal wants to do whatever it takes to win the war. >> larry: michael, you want to comment? >> no, i think peter has it

exactly right. if you look at the speech president obama made last march of 2009, he specifically says, my goal is to narrow the aims of the u.s. effort in afghanistan. a year later, those aims under the command of general mcchrystal had expanded exponentially. >> larry: what do you think of petraeus coming on the scene? >> i think there's a couple reasons he was chosen. the first thing it shows is there's not going to be a change in strategy immediately. i think the president did what he had to do today. every person i know who i've talked to, says if i had done this at my level, i'd be gone. in regards to general david petraeus, the arguments relieving general mcchrystal focus around the idea of, hey, do we switch horses midstream? my putting general david petraeus in there, you're

putting the architect of the doctrine, general mcchrystal's boss, somebody in there that allows the president not to be attacked on the fact that, hey, you're really changing strategy. everyone has confidence in general petraeus. so i think it shows it's not going to be a shift in tactics in the next 6 to 12 months but there's a huge concern about this timeline. because this timeline, to be realistic about it, it's kind of a joke. and it's not viable. so i think there's going to be another showdown 6 of 12 months down the road about where we're headed on this mission. >> larry: ari, is this comparable to mcclellan in the civil war, patton in world war ii? is it comparable? >> no, i don't think so, especially with macarthur and truman because that was a real policy difference. here you have the same support for counterinsurgency. the point just made is the big point. can we win in afghanistan? can we win when the president says the withdrawal will start

in july 2011? or do we need to leave it more open ended? so the military can have flexibility to fight and win? that's a debate to come. i was pleased to see the president's muse can you -- muscular speech today, though. he talked about defeating al qaeda. he said we are a nation at war. the question is, will he back up his military, as that deadline gets closer, and remain muscular if he's under a lot of pressure in his own party not to be that way. that's the big fight to come, larry. >> larry: michael, is general mcchrystal confident about an eventual victory there? >> general mcchrystal recently called his sort of centerpiece operation in marjah a bleeding ulcer. so that doesn't reflect the sort of confidence one would expect from the commanding general. so as you look at his other -- the other public comments he makes, they're all cautiously optimistic. even calling them "cautiously optimistic" might be an optimistic way to characterize them.

he talks about afghanistan being tough, afghanistan being long, afghanistan being a long, hard fight. so i think it's -- you know, i think there's definitely a question of how much -- how confident they believe they were in an eventual win. >> larry: peter, is this a demotion for petraeus? peter beinart? >> well, on paper, but it also just adds to the myth of petraeus as, you know, the one guy who can really save us in this circumstance. and certainly if petraeus can turn the war in afghanistan around, his legend will become even greater. but i think the fundamental question that we really need to be focusing on is, is this a coherent policy? i agree with what everyone else has said here. it's not at all realistic to think we're going to have made a lot of progress by the time we've reached this deadline. you either have to be a real counterinsurgency person in which you say we're going to do it for as long as it takes, as much as it's going to cost and

it's going to take a long time and cost a lot, or you have to recognize we need to -- we have to radically reduce our goals in afghanistan. there's no middle path there. obama is looking to split the baby. and you just can't do it. >> larry: michael, you're there. what do you see? >> well, i mean, this morning i witnessed a -- i was down in kandahar and witnessed a nasty firefight between taliban and americans. i was in a helicopter when it happened. then later in the afternoon, the base i was on was rocketed. which -- and we all had to get into the bunker and dive under our desk. these are daily occurrences. the fighting in kandahar specifically which is going to intensify over the next few months, it's going to be bloody and it's going to be rough. the afghan government officials are very nervous about the july 2011 draw-down. i think 24 this is one of the key problems. you know, president obama has

committed to sending 150,000 troops approximately to afghanistan. but by putting the deadline there, he undercut any strategic impact he is going to have so he's paying the cost of putting the troops there but he's undercut himself by saying he's going to withdraw. because then the sort of afghan players he needs on his side don't trust that he's there with them for the long haul. >> larry: we'll ask the veteran john soltz what he thinks. that's when we come back. look in the glove box. [ children laughing ] suitcase? huh? ♪ where do gummy bears hide? under the seat. look! yeah! ♪ [ telephone rings ] [ male announcer ] the all new chevy equinox. [ man ] guess who? dad! [ man ] enjoy the trip! okay, daddy! [ laughter ] [ male announcer ] a consumers digest best buy. with a 100,000 mile powertrain warranty. it takes you farther... and brings you closer. somewhere, is making thecccccccc

>> larry: want to help our friends in the gulf? we're still raising money. go to cnn.com/larryking. click on the charity buzz auction to bid on some great items with proceeds going to the people and the wildlife who need it the most. all right, john soltz, where's

all this going in afghanistan? >> well, we're not going in the right direction. look, larry, we were on the segment together after the president's initial speech at west point. the time line makes no sense at all. when you want to put all these troops in there. the question is what are our objectives on the ground? we need to have a limited objective which is deny al qaeda the ability to train terrorists to attack our country. what happens when we put force throughout, you know, any of these countries? it happened in kosovo. they went into macedonia. it happened in iraq. in my unit. we put a lot of ground power on the ground to free up our logistics lines. as soon as we put troops on the ground, we push the enemy somewhere else. we can put hundreds of thousands of troops in afghanistan, push people around, but in the end the problems still exist. we need a slim down strategy. it's not about time lines. maybe we need 20,000 on the ground in afghanistan, 15,000 on the ground. but hundreds of thousands of troops for tens of years is what will really be required for counterinsurgency. that is the big debate that many

looms here. because i do think general petraeus and mcchrystal are more biased towards this "let's prove i'm right on coin strategy." the vice president is still in the corner of we need a trimmed down mission that's global. >> larry: ari, you disagree? >> i'm not a military strategist, so i invest in those who are. in this case, it's general petraeus and general mcchrystal. in fact, it's president obama. he's the one who is commander in chief who accepted their judgment. he basically overruled vice president biden and others on his staff. and so nobody wants to be at war for ten years. but the other hand, nobody wants to have our country struck again. this is the difficulty of being commander in chief in the age of terror. i think the president has got it right. i think he's doing it the right way. i hope he continues doing it that way. i think he's doing it right. >> larry: pete hegseth, how about the fact that the afghanistans are awfully rough people to fight? you're in their territory. you're on their rocks.

>> it's definitely a tough fight. listen, it's going to be long. it's going to be tough. but it's interesting to hear john say what he said. has he not learned the lesson we learned in iraq? clearly president obama who opposed the iraq surge learned it. petraeus helped us win the war in iraq. now we've got an opportunity to apply those same principles to afghanistan. to say a lighter footprint is going to help our operations there, that's exactly what those who said the surge couldn't work said in 2007. instead, we upped our footprint, committed to protecting the population. and we did it right. now john is right in that a time line completely undercuts that. so if the obama administration's going to maintain this time line, then counterinsurgency is not going to work. if they're willing to be flexible on it. the one guy who can question them on that time line is petraeus. he has that credibility. they've kicked the can down the road on that. petraeus will put his input at the end of this year. we may see that deadline pushed. if that happens, then we can create the conditions in afghanistan where an afghani government can stand up. but that will not happen with a time line.

it is a much tougher problem set than iraq. we'll see. we need to learn the lessons of the iraq insurgency. general david petraeus is the man that can make it happen, if it can happen. >> larry: michael, we're running out of time. first, i salute you, as everyone agrees, it's a brilliantly written article, very well done. how long you going to stay there? >> i'm probably going to be heading out pretty soon after this trip. but thanks very much for your kind words. >> larry: what's your next article about? >> i have an article coming up about helicopter pilots and i also have an article that will be upcoming about what we won or didn't win in iraq. i spent a number of months in iraq as well recently. >> larry: thank you so much. michael hastings. the article will be out friday. and ari fleisher, pete hegseth, peter beinart and john soltz, we thank them all. when we come back, soledad o'brien. we're going to talk about her new special about the evolving american family.

don't go away. [ male announcer ] thinking about your florida vacation and about what's happening in the gulf? well, florida has 825 miles of beaches... and 1,260 miles of coastline. so, there's plenty of places in florida to enjoy crystal clear waters and a great beach vacation. go to florida live at visitflorida.com. for real-time information. now enjoy your florida vacation at incredible savings in naples, marco island and the everglades. plan online at paradisecoast.com/deals.

sir? finding everything okay? i work for a different insurance company. my auto policy's just getting a little too expensive. with progressive, you get the "name your price" option, so we build a policy to fit your budget. wow! the price gun. ♪ ah! wish we had this. we'd just tell people what to pay. yeah, we're the only ones that do. i love your insurance! bill? tom? hey! it's an office party! the freedom to name your price. only from progressive. call or click today.

breaking news tonight live from louisiana. we just learned the obama administration lawyers will appeal tuesday's ruling, striking down a six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling.

they'll have delay lifting the ban until an appeals court reviews the case. this is what the oil leak looked like, uncapped, unchecked oil. we'll tell you why it was removed today and how close bp is to getting it back on. also, my trip out to see why efforts to keep oil from coming onshore are being slowed. that's at the top of the hour. now back to "larry king live." there are a zillion kids at this park. i would come here and watch one or two kids interact, run around and follow them and think i want to have a child. >> i always loved kids. it brings out the kid in me. there's nothing like the love of a child. >> larry: we welcome soledad o'brien, cnn anchor, special correspondent and her newest "in america" special is tony & gary

have a baby, june 24th at 8:00 and again at 11:00 on cnn. gary is in new york. tony is with us here in los angeles. they have been a couple for 20 years. they married in canada in 2005. lifelong gay activists. how did you come upon this, soledad? >> one of our focuses of our unit "in america" was to tell the story of people whose stories sometimes fly under the radar, people's whose voices are not told. so when we came to the story of gary and tony and their quest to have a family, to have a baby, we knew this would be a great "in america" if they would allow us to follow them around for a year plus to document every facet of their lives. >> larry: are you taking it to the birth of the baby? >> everything. >> from before the birth of the baby, working with our carrier, surrogate, going to ultrasound, finding out that we were pregnant, finding out if it's a boy. >> larry: saying we, who was the spermer? >> my husband, gary, is the biological spermer.

>> larry: because you had fathered a child before, right? >> yes. i have a 5-year-old daughter named piper who lives in new york with her two moms right around the corner from us. >> larry: why did you agree to be followed around? >> sometimes i ask myself that question. gary and i both understood how important it is to tell your story, to be honest and maybe hopefully in the process change some hearts and minds. there's also a selfish motivation because we really wanted to have this incredible documentation of our family. what a great -- gary calls it a love letter to nicholas to be able to show him this story. >> larry: gary, why was it important to you to have a child? >> i grew up in a very big, extended italian family. my grandparents were immigrants from southern italy where family was the big value to work the farm. as a child i always knew i would have a kid. and then i realized i was gay, i didn't really know how that was going to work out. and through a series of meeting

the right man and a friend passing away, leaving us the money, it enabled us to have a surrogate and have our child. >> larry: soledad, in covering this as a documentarian, in a sense, what puzzled you about it? what intrigued you about this? >> once we really got commitment that we would be able to follow this story organically, we would go with the highs and we would go with the lows. we talk about the struggles. we talk about the good times. we would tell the story of the journey. then i knew as long as we were really being authentic that that would be a great story, regardless of how it went. there were great highs and tough, tough times. there's a lot of crying in this documentary. so, for me, i knew that they were both good talkers. we get into their back stories, where gary and tony came out to their families, how challenging that was and their activism and now this new phase of life as parents. it's just a really interesting story. at the end of the day, not only

about two guys who are gay, but about two human beings who are on a quest for something bigger than themselves. human stories matter to everybody. so, for us, it was just a natural. >> larry: how do you like fatherhood, gary? >> it's really fun. there's always been a child-like quality in me and now i have somebody to play with who is totally open to whatever i want to do. he's just a vessel of love like i never experienced before. it's pretty great. >> larry: what about adoption? there are children who need homes. do you think you -- are you adoptive parents? >> i just thought i would probably be an adoptive dad. i know there are a lot of kids in the world that need a home and need to be loved. >> larry: yeah. >> we have plenty of love to give. this route just seemed to work out quickest and best. tony did father a child with friends of ours and he knew the joy of having a biological offspring and wanted me to have that same experience. >> larry: you know that child? >> oh, yeah, yeah.

piper is a big part of our lives. >> larry: she's a girl? and you have a boy? >> she's with me here in the green room. >> larry: in new york? >> tony and gary also wanted to have everyone who was part of their story involved in their story. that met that the egg donor, holly, was someone who would be part of their lives. the surrogate also makes an appearance in their life and stays in their lives. >> larry: why not have the egg donor also be the carrier? >> particularly for gay men who are having babies with surrogates, they have found that if the child is not a biological offspring of the surrogate -- it's called gestational surrogacy, then it's easy for that surrogate to give that child to the intended parts. and in the process, we had a social worker, it's emotionally not easy.

>> larry: "in america" special hosted by the terrific soledad o'brien, one of the best in the business. "tony & gary have a baby," thursday at 8:00, repeated at 11:00. we'll be right back. less travel? more video conferences? limit the cell phone minutes. that's not good enough. we're not leaving this room unless we can cut something else. can they really keep us here? what about all this stuff? what stuff? all this stuff. what does it cost to create all this? time, effort, people. how much? it could be millions. ♪ millions. [ male announcer ] save money. trust your business processes to xerox. xerox. ready for real business. [ female announcer ] i heart dalmatians

made a cup of delicious starbucks via ready brew. she shared it with i heart chihuahuas and i heart labs. she even shared it with i heart cats. premium starbucks via ready brew. now available wherever you buy groceries. ♪ i had a heart problem. i was told to begin my aspirin regimen. i just didn't listen until i awoke with pains in my chest. i almost lost my life. my doctor's again ordered me to take aspirin. and i do. i make sure that he does it. [ male announcer ] aspirin is not appropriate for everyone, so be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. [ mike ] i encourage everyone to listen to the doctor. and take it seriously. [ male announcer ] learn moret at iamproheart.com.

tdd# 1-800-345-2550 i thought investment firms were there tdd# 1-800-345-2550 to help with my investments. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 so where's that help when i need it? tdd# 1-800-345-2550 if i could change one thing... tdd# 1-800-345-2550 we'd all get a ton of great advice tdd# 1-800-345-2550 just for being a client. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 i mean, shouldn't i be able to talk about my money tdd# 1-800-345-2550 without it costing me a fortune? tdd# 1-800-345-2550 if i had my way, tdd# 1-800-345-2550 investment firms would be falling all over themselves tdd# 1-800-345-2550 to help me with my investments. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 (announcer) at charles schwab, investors rule. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 are you ready to rule? basic.? preferred.

okay. at meineke i have options, and 50% off brake pads and shoes. my money. my choice. my meineke. tony remembers the moment they met. >> across the room and our eyes met across the dance floor. >> such a cliche. >> it is but totally true, though. it happened that way. >> they've been together 20 years. gary and tony want to have a baby. >> larry: "gary & tony have a baby" airs june 24th. soledad o'brien hosts it. tony and gary are the parents. was everybody involved, soledad, the carrier, birth mother? do we meet them all?

>> absolutely. you meet them all. the woman who was the carrier was concerned and did not want to use her real name. at first wanted to be blurred out and eventually wanted to agree to use her real name because of concerns she had about the community which she lived. >> larry: what will the audience see the day of the birth? >> a lot of drama. a lot of drama. it doesn't go as planned. it doesn't go as planned at all and there's a little bit of chaos and a lot of driving and tears. >> larry: did you get to witness the birth? >> unfortunately, no, we did not. it was an emergency c-section. >> larry: oh, boy. >> we had the exact same kind of angst and strife that i'm sure every couple everywhere who has a baby has. >> larry: how was the crew alerted to this? were they living with them? >> blackberry calls, notification. everybody sort of waited. we knew the moment was coming and, of course, we discovered as gary and tony discovered and they had to make the long drive

to go to the baby. in the documentary, you see the panic that ensues and the frantic driving that takes place. speed limits were broken across many states. >> a little bit. >> larry: how much of life with the baby do we get to see? >> it's the story of having him. there's a lot of lead up, going shopping and trying to -- having a baby shower and all of that. so finally at the end when he's there -- i mean, he really is the most beautiful, wonderful -- i'm sure every parent says that. >> larry: gerber baby. >> he is a gerber baby. >> he is a cute baby. is you get a sense of that at the end. >> the story is about the process, about the journey. the story is about two guys who want to be parents and how challenging that can be. the legal hoops they have to jump through. tony is a lawyer, which i'm sure helped greatly in the whole process. >> larry: you say something got filed today. >> yes. there was -- because we made this process open to the -- to cnn, so they were at my final

adoption hearing where i had to adopt nicholas. and the judge had to write a decision to allow the cameras in the courtroom. and she released this decision today and it's really quite beautiful. it's really beautiful. >> larry: gary, what is nicholas going to call you? >> daddy. >> larry: what is he going to call you, tony? >> i'm papa. >> larry: daddy and papa? >> yes. he'll probably call us whatever he wants to. >> he might be very creative and make up his own words. >> larry: we have limited time left, soledad. they're going to have some difficulties, aren't they? >> no question about it. i think everybody goes through the entire process foreshadowing that. you know, it is a rarity to have two men use a surrogate and have a baby. it is one of the reasons we did this story, because the process is so uncommon. >> larry: i'm intrigued with both of you. soledad's specials are always some of the best things seen on this network and i'm really loing forward to this one.