>> it is hard not to smile and perhaps even cry. it's been quite a night again. what began with a rescue worker named manuel gonzalez heading down into the mine some 24 hours ago ended late tonight, just moments ago with manuel gonzalez making that final journey out of that mine. 33 miners all home safe. that does it for "360." thanks for watching coverage of it. i'll see you tomorrow night. i'm for first media. >> i'm wolf blitzer. thank you so much for joining us for what is certain to be one of the most widely watched events of this, the 2010 midterm election season. >> let's introduce the candidates. joining us this evening, chris

coons, welcome. and republican christine o'donnell. welcome. >> thank you. >> we also want to thank aarp delaware and the american cancer society, cancer action network for their support making this debate possible. >> let's go through some of the rules, some of the ground rules for this 90-minute debate. it's divided into two parts, following a two-minute opening statement from each candidate nancy and i will pose question, responses to that initial question limited to two minutes with a one-minute rebuttal from the other candidate. and then there will be an opportunity for all of us to mix it up a little bit to get into a discussion and follow up. that's the first hour. the first 60 minutes of this debate. that will be followed by a 30-minute segment during which we turn to the students here at the university of delaware. they have question, responses to their questions will be limited to one minute. each candidate will also have two minutes at the end for a closing statement.

our live audience here is mitchell hall understands, we hope, that there will be no applause during tonight's debate. we want everyone to be quiet and listen and learn from these two candidates. a coin toss determined earlier the order for this evening. we begin with two-minute opening statements from each of the candidates and we begin with chris coons. >> thank you. thank you, president harker. to our moderators, wolf blitzer and our hosts for political communications. there is a great deal at stake. for our state, for our families and for our country. all of us regardless of our political leanings recognize that washington is broken. as i've traveled up and down the state the last nine months as a candidate listening to voters talk about the issues facing them in their daily lives i've heard again and again their frustration with washington and with elected officials who are putting narrow partisan agendas ahead of the good of our country and doing little to help millions of americans out of

work or on the verge of losing their homes overanxious about their futures. the partisan gridlock in washington has real implications for us here in delaware. there's more than 35,000 delawareans still out of work and nearly 3,000 families that faced foreclosure this year. these aren't just numbers. in delaware these are our neighbors and can't simply stand by and watch washington ignore us or them any longer. in this election, delaware's voters face a clear and important choice. between on the one hand my opponent, a candidate who wants to take our state and country back to the failed economic policies of the past, who values partisan bickering over compromise and solutions, and who i believe has extreme positions that threaten vital education programs and would abandon our commitment to our veterans. on the other hand in my case a candidate with a proven record and finding solutions to work with delaware's businesses large and small, helping to create jobs and spur growth. over the next 90 minutes i look

forward to the chance to share with you my ideas and values, delaware values that i learned growing up here and working with one of delaware's most innovative manufacturing companies and leading delaware's second largest government. i take seriously the idea this campaign is a job interview and tonight's debate is about giving delaware's voters insight into which candidate has the experience, values and ideas to best represent them and do the hard work of fixing what's broken in washington. thank you. >> your opening statement. >> thank you. thank you to our hosts and for everyone being here tonight. i'm running because i'm concerned about the direction of our country. the america we knew and grew up with is being threatened in the most serious way. in just three years we will be paying $1 billion a day on the interest alone on our national debt. the commonsense men and women in this room and all across delaware know this is not sustainable, yet, my opponent wants to go to washington and

rubber-stamp the failed spending bills that are coming from -- that have cost us 2.5 million jobs. this is wrong. uncle sam needs to be cut off. with your vote and your support, i want to go to washington to create jobs based on private business, not your tax dollars. i want to fight to have our nation become debt-free. i want to stop the tax hikes that are coming in january. i want to reach sustainable energy independence, support the military and strengthen the security of our homeland. i want to fight to safeguard social security, improve education and protect our constitutional liberties. in an election year when so much is at stake just about every candidate says this. yet, what distinguishes one candidate from another are the proposed solutions to reach these goals. i very much look forward to getting down to brass tacks with all of you over the next 90 minutes because i believe there is a clear choice in this election. a vote for my opponent will cost the average delaware family

$10,000 instantly between the january tax hikes and his vote for cap and trade. most of us can't afford that. if you think that government is too small, and that you're taxed too little, if you've ever questioned whether america is a beacon of freedom and justice, then he's your guy. but if you want a u.s. senator who will stand up to the washington elite, who will put your interests ahead of the special interests and make the tough decisions needed to rein in an out-of-control washington then i humbly ask you to vote then i humbly ask you to vote o'donnell for u.s. senate. [ male announcer ] the turn changes everything.

♪ the turn will make you think. ♪ make you re-examine your approach. change your line. innovate. and create one of the world's fastest-reacting suspensions, reading the road 1,000 times per second. it's the turn that leads you somewhere new. introducing the new 2011 cts-v coupe. from cadillac. the new standard of the world.

absolutely using my old social security number.

>> we're now getting into our question portion of the evening. and i'll begin with you, mr. cones. creating jobs to get america back to work clearly has to be a priority to do. americans voted overwhelmingly for democrats during the last election because most felt that the democrats would be able to fix the failing economy. unemployment is at 9.6%. almost three-quarters of americans in the most recent cnn opinion research corporation poll said that the economy is still in a recession. so why should the voters of delaware trust a democrat this time around? >> well, nancy, thanks for your question. i think the voters of delaware should trust this democrat because of my combination of experience, working in the

private sector and working with the private sector, hands-on work helping one of delaware's most innovative companies expand and grow jobs and concrete and engaged work as county executive working with our chamber of commerce, lots of groups who represent businesses large and small to effectively grow the economy. i've also presented as a candidate for the senate concrete and real ideas. they're on my website, but i look forward to the chance to go over them in some detail tonight. i would advocate for a research and development tax credit and expand our tax credit that's combined with a new manufacturing tax credit that advocates for companies that invent things here and make them here, getting an extra inventive. i also think we need to change the crazy tax policy in washington that gives an incentive to american companies to shut down operations here and ship jobs overseas. there's other things i've proposed. expanding the home office tax credit. expanding a tax credit for starting a new business that employs folks within the first couple of years. fighting harder in trade policy

to make sure that we're not letting our trading partners take advantage of us in trade deals that were signed over previous years. doing more in investment and innovation. at the end of the day, i think delaware has a long tradition of inventing and manufacturing world class products. the best way for us to get out of this recession is through growth. the best way to growth is by taking advantage of the skills and resources of a world class university like this one where we're having this debate this evening and tying that to a stronger, more qualified, more capable workforce, giving it the resources and the energy it needs to be once again the leader in the world in creating high-quality, high value manufacturing jobs. those are some of the ideas i look forward to discussing more this evening. thank you. >> miss o'donnell, you have one minute for a rebuttal. >> first, we have to keep in mind my opponent has a history of promising not to raise taxes on the campaign trail and then breaking those promises as soon as he takes office. unemployment here in new castle county rose, almost doubled in the last two years under his watch as new castle county executive. now, when it comes to the

policies that he has said on the campaign trail he wille continue to rubber-stamp the spending policies coming from washington, we were promised that the stimulus bill would create jobs. but instead it cost us 2.6 million jobs. we were promised that it would keep unemployment at 8%. but instead we see unemployment at 9.7%. the democrats are bragging that unemployment has leveled out, but while unemployment has leveled out, more people than ever are on food stamps and are our welfare spend something higher than ever. this is not the right move. this is not a move towards real economic recovery. this is a move towards creating a culture of dependency. i believe the best thing the government -- >> that's the time, sorry. but now we do get to open it to discussion. >> great. >> what specifically, miss o'donnell, would you do, specifically, to create jobs? >> what i think the best thing the government can do to get our economy back on real economic recovery is for -- to get out of the way of the small business

owner and to get out of the way of the entrepreneur and the way you do that is to make sure these tax hikes don't come in january. you begin to roll back some of the regulation that's forced them to close their doors. a couple things that i'm proposing. number one, a temporary two-year tax holiday on the capital gains tax to give investors the money they need to reinvest in business. to permanently eliminate the death tax. that's not only an unjust bill because we've paid taxes while we saved it, but it will also create 1.5 million new jobs. >> let me just remind that we are in the discussion portion so you can interject here as well as we continue to discuss that point. >> i'm not sure i understand what ms. o'donnell means when she says this is simply creating a cultural dependency and her primary objective would be to end the endless regulation and red tape. she denounced the obama administration when, frankly, just a few weeks ago, a new bill

that would provide expanded sba loan capacity, t.a.r.p. funds that have been repaid, being repurchased towards small and midsized banks all over the united states. real and concrete steps are being taken. i also frankly can't imagine where she found the numbers that unemployment doubled in just the past year under my watch. i suspect we're going to need to keep a close eye this evening on the numbers that go flying back and forth. >> let's ask her. where did you find those numbers? >> the department of labor statistics and we'll have them on our website tomorrow. i want to point out that he said that we're not creating a culture of dependency. how would you explain what is happening when unemployment is leveled out, but more and more people are on food stamps? we've got to ask ourselves, what do we want delawareans to be receiving, food stamps or paychecks? i say paychecks. >> obviously paychecks. we'd like to have americans able to receive the benefits they need to get through incredibly difficult times. but to simply denounce people as being dependent because they're applying for and receiving food stamps -- >> oh, chris, that's not fair -- >> -- in the worst recession in modern times -- >> that's not fair of you to say that because that's not at all

what i'm doing. i'm not the person who would cut the tax benefits for disabled and low-income senior citizens as you did as county executive. but what i'm proposing is to give these tax -- to make sure that the tax cuts for all delawareans do not expire this january. you have said that you will stop the tax cuts for the so-called rich. what you fail to realize is that the so-called rich are the small business owner, the dry-cleaner down the street, the pizza shop owner who makes $300,000 before they pay their four employees, before they feed their own family -- >> miss o'donnell, we're going to try to have a conversation here this evening rather than just a diatribe if we possibly could. i think it would be helpful for us to be able to have an exchange of ideas, and let each of us take turns, so thank you for moderating, wolf. i think it's important to look

closely at some of the things miss o'donnell's thrown out on her new website. most of them are untrue. some of them are flat-out lies. some are just factually untrue. i'm not going to stop every single time there's something she throws out that i disagree with or i think is factually untrue. but let me just say at the outset that much of what you've put out, much of how you've characterized my record is incorrect and if we simply sit here this evening and say, that's not true, we're not going to make much progress. >> do you support keeping the bush tax cuts for all americans or only those make under $200,000 a year? >> i support extending them for the majority of americans. i don't think we should draw an arbitrary line at $250,000. but the value that i will apply as deciding how much to extend, whether it goes up to 1 million or 2 million or 5 million is that we've got a tough choice to make. every increased tax cut, every extension given, it's going to cost, it's going to increase the deficit, add to the debt. here's the primary value i would apply in deciding whether to extend all of the bush tax cuts and for how long. i think we should do those tax cuts that have the best chance of getting our economy going again -- >> all right -- >> we're out of time though for

this discussion. >> but you're going to have an opportunity -- >> okay. >> you're going to have an opportunity to get back into this discussion because this is issue number one. jobs, jobs, jobs. [ manager ] you know... i've been looking at the numbers, and i think our campus is spending too much money on printing. i'd like to put you in charge of cutting costs. calm down. i know that it is not your job. what i'm saying... excuse me? alright, fine. no, you don't have to do it. ok? [ male announcer ] notre dame knows it's better

for xerox to control its printing costs. so they can focus on winning on and off the field. [ manager ] are you sure i can't talk -- ok, no, i get it. [ male announcer ] with xerox, you're ready for real business. hi, may i help you? yes, we're looking to save on car insurance, even if that means we have to shop all day, right, honey? yep, all day. good thing you're starting here. we compare your progressive direct rate to other top companies', so you can save money! look! we saved a lot! and quick, too. and no more holding her purse! it's a european shoulder bag. it was a gift. mm-hmm. shopping less and saving more. now, that's progressive. call or click today.

[meow] desperate for nighttime heartburn relief? for many, nexium helps relieve heartburn symptoms caused by acid reflux disease. and for the majority of patients with prescription coverage for nexium, it can cost $30 or less per month. headache, diarrhea, and abdominal pain are possible side effects of nexium. other serious stomach conditions may still exist. ask your doctor if nexium can help relieve your heartburn symptoms. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. i want to get into the deficit right now. you've made the point the national debt is exploding, the budget deficit is exploding right now.

i want some specific meaningful cuts, if you're elected a senator from delaware, what would you cut in the federal budget? and don't just say waste, fraud and abuse, because everybody says that. what would you cut specifically? >> that's a great question because, first of all, we have got to tackle the deficit and the debt because our deficit is almost becoming equal to our national gdp. when your deficit -- a country's deficit equals your gdp, that's when your currency collapses, your market collapses. we've got to take drastic measures. >> so what would you cut? >> first of all, cancel the unspent stimulus bill. second of all, put a freeze on nondiscretionary -- on discretionary spending, put a hiring freeze on nonsecurity personnel, and then, of course, when we're talking about cutting government spending, we've got to talk about waste, fraud and abuse. a recent report came out said that we spend over 1 billion in medicaid waste fraud and abuse. we're talking about pharmacies,

billing for prescriptions given to dead people. we're talking about home health care companies billing for patients who were in the hospital. senator coburn recently put out a report called schoolhouse pork that disclosed millions of dollars that were supposed to go to education funding that instead went to special favors. now, special favors are something that my opponent knows very much about because he created 12 contingency funds so that he could pay out favors to special interest groups. the courts forced him to close 11 of them, but of the 1 that remained open, he paid $53,000 in a men's fashion show. he paid another -- more than $50,000 to appease liberal special interest groups at a time when he brags about balancing the budget by raising our taxes, cutting policemen pay, this is how he chooses to

spend our tax dollars. we've got to ask, do we want to send this gentleman to washington, d.c.? i would say no. he's a career politician who has proven he knows how to play the i'll scratch your back, you scratch mine game. >> you have a minute to respond. >> there's so much to respond to, wolf. a minute may not be enough. let me get back to the focus of the question, which is what would you do to tackle the deficit and the debt? i think we have very large challenges. the overwhelming majority federal spending is made up of defense spending, medicare, medicaid, social security and interest on the debt. while the president has proposed and i would seriously consider supporting a freeze on nondefense discretionary spending for three years, i've also identified on my website a series of reductions i would support. some of them are in agricultural price supports. some of them are in federal office space, for example, hiring and several of them are in defense programs. defense acquisition that the pentagon itself has already said they no longer need.

the c-17 program, for example, or the second engine for the f-35. there's a variety of platforms and programs i think we can simply do away with. as we invest in making our defense and military more modern, more flexible, more responsive to the real threats we face in the modern world and as we continue to achieve some savings through the program and other things that have shown a real capacity to save. >> let's open the discussion on correcting some of the financial issues here by talking about some of your own personal financial problems. and most people know about it by now including an irs lien that was for about $12,000 in taxes and penalties from 2005. there was the 2008 mortgage default judgment on your home. you just received your bachelor degree because it took a decade for you to pay often the tuition. the question then is how can voters rely upon your thoughts on how to manage the deficit if you're having such personal financial issues of your own? >> well, first of all, that irs tax lien, the irs already admitted that it was a computer error and my opponent should not

be bringing that up because as i've gone up and down the campaign trail, i've discovered that there are thousands of delawareans who have faced the same thing. an irs mistake has cost them greatly which is all the more reason why we need to reform the irs, not put them in control of our health care. second of all, you mentioned education. i don't have a trust fund. i didn't come from a privileged, sheltered background as my opponent says he did. >> let's stay to the issue of paying bills -- >> i am. i paid for my own college education. i also have a graduate fellowship in constitutional government i have a graduate fellowship from the claremont institute. i know how hard it is to earn and keep a dollar. and one of the reasons why the delawareans should be able to trust me is because when i did in this economy, i worked for nonprofit groups. nonprofit groups were the first to have been hurt. when i fell upon difficult times, i made the sacrifices needed to set things right. i sold my house, and i sold a

lot of my possessions in order to pay off my personal debt and to become in a stronger position. i have worked hard in order to get to the position that i am, so i can relate to the thousands of delaware families that are suffering right now, and i'm stronger for it. i made it through to the other side, and that's where -- leadership doesn't count in whether or not you fall, it counts in whether or not you've gotten up and that's what i've done. >> but let's just remember we're in the discussion portion so if you have anything you want to address within that response on things that have been said on this topic thus far, go for it. >> well, nancy, i, frankly, think that we need to focus in this debate this evening and in the campaign not on permanent difficulties but on the issues in front of you, the things delawareans are concerned about. how do we get delaware back to work? there's been lots of discussion in the national media about things my opponent has said or done that i frankly think are a distraction from the core issues that they ask us about. >> you're just jealous

>> you're jealous you weren't on "saturday night live." >> i'm dieing to see who's going to play me, christine. >> let's go to a serious note and get through the accusations that she made and give you a chance to respond. >> please. on the idea that i was the one responsible for being sued for creating 11, 12 -- she's confusing me with my predecessor. >> talking about county executive new castle, you raised property taxes three times, 25% hike in the last fiscal year, you proposed new taxes on hotels, paramedic services, even 911 calls from cell phones. is that true? >> no, it's not true that we proposed a tax on the calls to the 911 center. >> it's not true. >> and any decent research into that would reveal it. it's difficult, it's complicated. >> explain your record on taxes. did you increase taxes as the county executive? >> wolf, let me walk you through for a moment what's happened. because one of the attacks my opponent has made repeatedly is

that i've driven the county to the edge of bankruptcy. that's on her newest attack ad. nothing could be the further from the truth. today new castle county has a surplus. when i became executive in '05, it had a deficit. i have worked hard over six years to defend a very significant reserve, which has made it possible for us to continue to have a aaa bond rating. out of roughly 3,000 counties in america, roughly 30 have a aaa bond rating and i reached a bipartisan solution -- >> it says stop. >> -- cut more in spending than was raised in taxes. >> quick response. >> you've been criticized for saying that you brought the county to a aaa bond rating. you inherited that good rating. and how would you justify cutting the tax exemption for low-income seniors and disabled senior, cutting our policemen pay when you wastefully spent so much money on appeasing special interest groups? you simply can't justify that. that is a career politician. that is cronyism.

we don't need any more of that in washington. >> we have to move to the next series of questions. do you want to respond to that? >> there's a lot to respond to. >> do it in 30 seconds. >> that's going to be difficult, wolf. but i'll tell you that i'm proud of my record as new castle county executive. there were very hard choices that had to be made to clean up the government. every time you get a bond rating, you earn a bond rating. miss o'donnell is not familiar with how they work. each time you go to the bond market you are rerated. moody's, in their letter of rate two weeks ago, said it was because of the conservative fiscal policies of my administration that we had re-earned a aaa bond rating from all three agencies.

all right. let's move on to the next series of questions on national security, foreign policy right now. 100,000 american men and women are serving in the military in afghanistan right now. the president of afghanistan, hamid karzai, has now acknowledged he's in direct talks with the taliban leadership, wants to create what he calls a peace council. here's the question, and it goes to mr. coons, would you support a negotiated settlement in afghanistan that includes taliban representation? would that be acceptable to you, a deal between hamid karzai and the taliban? >> wolf, i'm concerned about the security of our troops in the field and about honoring the service and the sacrifice of our veterans. the war in afghanistan is the war of the two that we've been

engaged in, iraq and afghanistan, that i think was justified by a direct attack on the united states by the taliban who were offering harbor to al qaeda, who were the authors of the 9/11 attack. and i think in our tenth year now on the ground in afghanistan, we have to look hard at whether we're continuing to contribute to america's security by having 100,000 troops on the ground. i would support a negotiated resolution to the war that allowed us to leave security and intelligence assets in place and that allowed us the opportunity to re-engage should the taliban take control again or allow al qaeda to re-emerge as a real threat to the region or to the united states. we've spent $1.3 trillion in iraq and afghanistan. it has significantly contributed to our debt. we have lost more than 5,000 american servicemen and women. and i've got folks who i'm personally close to who are deployed now for their third or fourth tour. we have asked a lot of our men and women in the field. they have delivered brilliantly but, frankly, the mission has exceeded the scope that i think

we could initially reasonably expect of them. i'm far more concerned about the threats to our security posed by an unstable pakistan, posed by iran and posed by an endless war in a country where we're trying to build a nation where there hasn't been one in modern times. >> you have one minute to respond. >> i would ask him if he's serious about making sure that afghanistan doesn't become a safe haven for terrorists, why on the campaign trail he has said he supports this random time withdrawal. we have to support our men and women who are risking their lives. many have already given their lives over there, a random withdrawal that he has said he supports will embolden the terrorists to come after us even more saying i've chased away the superpower. when we withdraw from iraq, we need to make sure there are benchmarks in place. those bench marks are making sure there's a government, a representative government over there that serves the needs of the people and that can defend themselves. when we've reached these benchmarks, that's when we withdraw. >> do you want to respond to

that? >> she said withdraw from iraq. i suspect you meant from afghanistan. >> no, from iraq. did i say iraq? i'm sorry. thank you, you're correct. >> talking about afghanistan. >> thank you. >> frankly, i come from a family of veterans. i come from a family that has dedicated a lot to the service of our nation, and i wear a flag pin every day to remind me of the young man who grew up next door to me killed in iraq in december 2005. i never take lightly the enormous sacrifices that our servicemen and women have made now and that we ask them to continue making. i don't know how long is too long. but ten years strikes me as awfully long and i question whether your standard, whether your principles give us any hope of winding up this war on any reasonable time line because the government of hamid karzai has proven itself to be largely corrupt and to be frankly ineffective at establishing control over the whole country. we are doing our best. we have dedicated trillions, hundreds of billions of dollars to this conflict, and

i'm deeply concerned that it's a conflict without a reasonable end in sight. there are times in history -- >> saying that you're -- >> -- to honor the sacrifice of servicemen and women is to come up with a plan to responsibly wind down a conflict. >> and that plan to be based on those benchmarks, benchmarks that means that we have had success. again, you're saying how rhetoric -- you say that your top priority is the concern for the safety of us on the homeland if you seriously support this random time withdrawal because, again, all we're going to do is embolden terrorists to think they have more power than they do. and i would ask you, you know, a couple times whether it's the tax cuts or even here in this kind of veiled you've gone back and forth on what you just said in afghanistan, do you support the president or don't you support the president? with the tax cuts you're saying that you don't support the president. are you going to tell him that when he comes on friday? >> let's stay focused on the issue in front of us which is afghanistan. >> and it's your -- you're jumping around. >> no, we're staying focused on the issue of afghanistan rather than jumping to other issues. >> you're jumping around. >> the core issue -- >> let's let him finish his point.

>> the core issue here is what reasonable prospect do you for these gauze si time lines to result in a withdrawal? in iraq there was a modern nation, there was a central government, there was infrastructure in place. in afghanistan, there hasn't been a nation in decades. and so despite our ten years of incredible effort, we are not succeeding in building a nation. you put it if the benchmark is self-governance, security, we had a decent shot of that in iraq. >> do you remember when we were fighting the soviets in afghanistan in the '80 and '90s, we did not finish the job. so now we have a responsibility to finish the job, and if you'ring it to make these politically correct statements that it's costing us too much money you're threatening the security of the homeland. >> let's wrap this up. yes or no answer. is this nation more secure than it was under president bush? yes or no? >> yes. >> today? >> no.

i'm a home in a high-risk flood area. it doesn't look risky. i mean, phil, does this look risky to you?

nancy? fred? no. well it is. in a high-risk area, there's a 1-in-4 chance homes like us will flood. i'm glad i got flood insurance. fred, you should look into it. i'm a risk-taker. [ female announcer ] only flood insurance covers floods. visit floodsmart.gov/risk to learn your risk. [ commearlier, she hady vonn! an all-over achy cold... what's her advantage? it's speedy alka-seltzer! [ male announcer ] alka-seltzer plus rushes relief for all-over achy colds. the official cold medicine of the u.s. ski team. alka-seltzer plus.

we'll move on to our next topic, and this question goes to miss o'donnell. >> can i say why? >> no. >> we have more terrorist attacks on our homeland. >> we need to move on. i know that we said the statements out in the national media, the "saturday night live" skits are distractions, i appreciate that, but to the voter in delaware, it is the message that they are receiving. so we would be remiss if we did not address this issue. so the comments that you've made in the past, which are in your own words because they're on the videotape, have become the fodder for the late night tv shows. you even released an ad that opened up by saying "i am not a witch," and a local newspaper columnist said the comments you seem to be making make delawareans cringe. so what do you say to voters who want the change but are uncomfortable by these remarks? >> this election cycle should not be about comments i made on

a comedy show over a decade and a half ago. this election cycle should be about what is important to the people of delaware, how we're going to get real jobs back to delaware, how we're going to get our economy back on track, how we're going to protect our senior citizens and safeguard our social security. these are the issues that delawareans are concerned. you know, wolf, as you can attest, i have not welcomed this media attention. you've been asking for an interview for quite a long time. my priority has been getting back to delaware voters, going to as many community forums as possible to counter these things. my opponent has said the statements that we made in our 20s should be off the table, and after he made that statement, days later, he started running ads in his own campaign materials, he's going back on his word using those statements to misrepresent my character. so, again, i thank you for the opportunity for the delaware voters to get to know who i am

and what i'm all about because what i can assure them is while i made statements, my faith has matured over the years, but regardless of my personal faith, when i go down to washington, d.c., it is the constitution that i will defend, and it is by the constitution that i will make all of my decisions, and that will be the standard-bearer for every piece of legislation that i will vote on. >> mr. coons, you have a one-minute rebuttal. >> i was surprised to see in the newspaper an interview profile of both of us. miss o'donnell's statement, pretty similar to what you just heard from her, that she would not have her faith be a central driver of her decisions if elected. and i'm interested if we can explore further your suggestion that the constitution would be your guide. i'm interested in hearing whether it's the constitution passed by the founders, the constitution of 1920, the constituion of 1930, the constitution of 1975, the constitution of today. because to me protecting a woman's right to choose,

protecting reproductive predom and making sure that we've got on the record miss o'donnell's views on things like prayer, abortion, evolution, is important. these aren't just random statements on some late-night tv show. these are relevant to her service in the united states senate, what sort of judges she would confirm, what sort of issues she would take up. i'm someone who stands firmly behind the constitution as it stands today. i respect stare decisis, the decided case, the case law that governs the united states. >> let's go to the issue of faith and politics because you were a student pastor at yale and you said in an interview once that you thought you would end up a preacher, a professor or politician. you've occasionally been a guest speaker at some of the churches in the community, baptist churches, presbyterian churches to name a few, so how much of an influence does this faith in your life have on your politics? >> faith is a central part of how my wife and i are raising our three children, of why we decide to do the community service and the outreach that we do, but ours is a faith that we

think is a general motivation towards public service, towards trying to create a community that's more tolerant, inclusive and just and towards sort of forgiveness, healing and reconciliation that we think is the central message of our faith. but i also think, as someone who has been elected ten year, i've learned to reach a balance where my private faith, the aspects of my faith that are religious doctrine don't influence decisions that i've made for the public in my ten years in county office. >> well, let's give you a chance to respond to some of the things she said, because in a television appearance back in 1998 on bill maher's show, you said evolution is a myth. do you believe evolution is a myth? >> i believe that the local -- i was talking about what a local school taught, and that should be taught -- that should be decide on the local community. but please let me respond to what he just said. >> we will let you respond but answer the question. do you believe evolution is a myth? >> local schools should make that decision. i made that remark based on --

>> but what do you believe? >> what i believe is irrelevant. >> why is it irrelevant? voters want to know. >> what i will support in washington, d.c., is the ability for the local school system to decide what is taught in their classrooms, and what i was talking about on that show was a classroom that was not allowed to teach creationism as an equal theory as evolution. that is against their constitutional rights, and that is an overreaching arm of the government, but please allow me at least the full minute to respond to what he said because he said these statements that we made should be taken into consideration when casting your vote, so then i would be remiss not to bring up the fact that my opponent has recently said that it was studying under a marxist professor that made him become a democrat. so when you look at his position on things like raising taxes, which is one of the tenets of

marxism, not supporting, eliminating the death tax, which is a tenet of marxism, i would argue that there are more people who support my catholic faith than his marxist beliefs. and i'm using his own words >> we're going to clarify that. we're going to clarify that. >> because a lot of people remember because they've learned in the last few weeks you did once describe yourself when in college a long time ago as a bearded marxist. >> i hope folks will go and read the article, an article i wrote as a senior the day of our commencement speech and the title and content of that clearly makes it obvious that it was a joke. there was a group of folks who i had shared a room with, my roommates junior year who were in the young republican club and thought when i returned from kenya and registered as a democrat that doing so was proof that i had gone all the way over to the far left end so they jokingly called me a bearded marxist. if you take five minutes and read the article, it's clear on the face of it it was a joke. despite that, my opponent and

lots of folks in the right wing media have endlessly spun this. i'm not now, nor have i ever been anything but a clean-shaven capitalist. >> well, i would -- i would stand to disagree because, first of all, if you're saying what i said on a comedy show is relevant to this election, then absolutely you writing an article, forget the bearded marxist comment, you writing an article saying that you learned your beliefs from an articulate, intelligent marxist professor and that's what made you become a democrat, that should send chills up the spine of every delaware voter because then if you compare that statement to your policies -- >> if it were accurate, if it were true, i'd agree. but it's not accurate. it's not true. >> you said that on msnbc a few weeks ago. [ j. weissman ] it was 1975. my professor at berkeley asked me if i wanted to change the world.

i said "sure." "well, let's grow some algae." and that's what started it. exxonmobil and synthetic genomics have built a new facility to identify the most productive strains of algae. algae are amazing little critters. they secrete oil, which we could turn into biofuels. they also absorb co2. we're hoping to supplement the fuels that we use in our vehicles, and to do this at a large enough scale to someday help meet the world's energy demands. [ evan ] ah it's cool. ah... ah. ah. ah. ah. ah. ah. ah. ah. ah! ah! whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, what is that? how come my dap wasn't like that? huh? it's just an "us" thing. yeah, it's a little something we do. who else is in this so-called "us"? man, i don't know. there's a lot of us. [ chuckles ] ask your friends what it's like to be part of a group that's 40 million strong. state farm insures more drivers than geico and progressive combined. it's no surprise, with so many ways to save and discounts of up to 40%. so call an agent at 1-800-state-farm or go online.

♪ now the healing power of touch just got more powerful. introducing precise from the makers of tylenol. precise pain relieving heat patch activates sensory receptors. it helps block pain signals for deep penetrating relief you can feel precisely where you need it most. precise. only from the makers of tylenol. so i got my nephew to build a website. i hired someone to make my website... five months ago. we are building a website by ourselves. announcer: there's an easieway. create youown small-business site with intuit websites. just choose a style that fits your business and customize, publish and get found in three easy steps. sweet. all from just $4.99 a month, get a 30-day free trial at intuit.com.

personal pricing now on brakes. tell us what you want to pay. we do our best to make that work. deal! my money. my choice. my meineke. >> this goes to you first, mr. cones. this goes to the issue of education in our country. and in many public school districts across america, as they're trying to get in accountability in the classroom, it is very difficult to dismiss an underperforming teacher because of the stringent contracts that have been negotiated with the individual school districts and teacher unions. so do you feel that teacher unions are too powerful? >> nancy, one of the things that i've complimented both delaware's teachers and governor for is their remarkable progress under the race to the top program. one of the best parts of the

obama/biden administration's is i like both the process and outcome. they set a very high bar, offered a federal pot of money available for those states willing to make significant changes and delaware and tennessee were two states that made that progress. delaware's teachers union, dsea, came to the table and with the leadership of the governor made significant changes, things a lot of folks predicted they wouldn't do to embrace charters and to make them more powerful, to make it possible for schools underperforming to be shut down or restructured and to change a system so that teacher compensation could be tied to improvement by students in the classroom. i think our teachers deserve our support, and i think our teachers have a long tradition of contributing significantly, not just to educating our children but to building a stronger and better community. my own mother and grandmother were school teachers, and i deeply respect the hard work that they do. earlier today i was at eisenburg school in new castle because this is national school lunch week. the work that our teachers do,

the work that is done in early education from head start to full day kindergarten through k through 12 education, the work that's done here and at great public universities around the state and country is critical to laying the groundwork for our future. and i have no problem with recognizing that the folks who do the hard work, the teachers and the paraprofessionals are entitled to a good standard of live, are entitled to be age to live a life where they have health care, a pension, job security. i do think there are issues we have to tackle and race to the top is significant progress in them in making sure schools are performing as best they can. >> you have a minute to respond. >> well, if you notice he didn't answer the question as to whether or not he thought the teachers' unions were too powerful and it's probably because he got their endorsement. i would have to say that we in delaware where we spend so much money on education, it ends up going to the six-figure salaries of bureaucrats and superintendents, not to the teachers in the classroom. it's appalling that in a state where we spend so much federal and state dollars on education, good teachers who want to get

extra materials have to do so out of their pocket. i have met many teachers. i've sat down with them and talked to them about their concerns with race to the top and whether they're democrat or republican, a lot of them express we are not spending our education dollars appropriately. we're not helping the classroom, and what's going to happen when the race to the top funding drys up. we have a broken system especially in wilmington where a live. we have a high dropout rate. throwing more money on a broken system is not going to work. instead, what we need to do is sit down and have conversations with the teachers, not the union, about what they need us to do to help them in the classroom. >> over the years a number of conservatives have proposed eliminating the department of education in washington. do you support eliminating the department of education? >> i don't think that we need to go to that drastic of a step, but as i said, senator coburn has released a report that shows where millions of dollars in department of education money has been abused. that's the kind of stuff we have

to stop. we also have to make sure that the money we are putting into education does go to the classroom and make them more effective. that's something that we're ignoring. every time that there's a problem, we just throw more money in it to appease the special interest groups. we're not getting to root of the problem, and that's what we need to do, start getting to the root of the problem, which means talking to the teachers and not own will that, putting the power back to the parents over where they send their children to school. >> in a recent survey of 30 industrialized countries, the united states ranked 25th in math, 21st in science, finland was first in math, south korea was first in science. specifically what would you do to make the united states number one, once again, in math and science? >> great question. and as someone who spent 20 years working with a nonprofit foundation, the i have a dream foundation, that raises money from private individuals and helps provide scholarships for

students, for teachers, and for a college education, i've been hands-on and engaged with some of the toughest schools in america and some teachers who are significantly undersupported by their districts and who needed additional resources to deliver on a promise of an effective education. i think there's a significant role though for the federal government in providing financial support and encouragement, scholarships for those teachers in sta and stynes and technology and engineering and math. we need a new generation of teachers who are fully prepared, fully qualified to engage their students in the classroom, to use the latest teaching tools in media, to teach to the standards that no child left behind established and that need to be modernized and made more flexible and responsive and we frankly need to use collaborative techniques. >> i'm sorry, but we're time keeping here. >> a quick chance to respond. what would you do specifically to make the united states number one? >> again, what i would say to improve our education, we have to empower the teachers to do what they need to do to be more

effective. they're the ones on the first line of defense. they're the ones who have the most influence over our students. but we also have to empower the parents. so i support charter schools and i support student vouchers or school vouchers so that it gives parents regardless of income, regardless of status, an opportunity for their students to have a shot at a great education until our public schools do improve.

on your next business trip, pack your marriott rewards visa card. get triple points every time you use your card at marriott. apply now and earn 22,500 bonus points when you use your card and enjoy a free night stay. so, before you know it, work time becomes well-deserved downtime. apply now at marriott.com/freenightstay. you've got staying power.

let's switch gears and talk about health care, which is such an important issue to millions and millions of americans right now. under the new health care law that was recently signed into law by the president, children now can stay on their parents' insurance policies until the age of 26. people can no longer be denied coverage for pre-existing conditions. insurers, the big insurance companies are prohibited from rescinding coverage if a customer becomes sick, and they can't impose any lifetime limits on essential benefits like hospital stays or expensive treatments. you say you want to repeal all of that? >> well, first of all, no one's disputing that our health care system before obama care didn't need reform. those are very important things that are part of insurance reform, not healthe