i think we'll find to great sadness we've lost several thousand young americans and many more thousand wounded undertaking a project we couldn't do. >> paul bremer defended his role earlier on today's show. that's today's "sound of sunday." i'm joe johns. candy crowley is back next sunday. this is "gps," the "global public square." welcome to our viewers in the united states and around the world, i'm fareed zakaria. we have an important show for you today. the u.s. might have exited one war this week, but it is very much in the midst of another. i will have an exclusive conversation with the leader of afghanistan, hamid karzai, on the ongoing violence in his country and how that affects the u.s. plan to draw down. then, a true all-star "gps" panel including peggy noonan and david remnick on the ever-shifting gop field, vladimir putin and the protests in russia, and the euro's chances of survival. finally, what are we

bringing back from iraq? you'll be amazed. but first, here's my take. "time" magazine announced its person of the year this week -- "the protester." from the arab spring to athens, from new delhi to new york, people power is stronger than it's ever been. and now it's reached moscow with the protests there last week. the great drama of russian history has been between its state and society. put simply, russia has always had too much state and not enough society. historians have pointed out that the russian nation was literally the property of the czar, that serfs were more like slaves than simply peasant workers as they were in europe, and that the country lacked any institutions that contested the authority of the government. the communist takeover in 1917 only enhanced these features by building a soviet superstate that dominated every aspects of people's lives. when it collapsed in 1991, it turned out there was only chaos underneath.

but there has always been a russian civil society, small but vibrant, espousing universal values and human rights. it is the russia of tolstoy and pasternak, sakharov and gorbachev. and it has always believed that russia's destiny and values lies with the west. this russia has not died under putin. in fact, it's been growing quietly but vigorously over the past decade. there are now more than 650,000 nongovernmental organizations in russia today. of course, the russian state is very powerful, dominant and pervasive in politics and the economy. despite all the stirrings of change, the power of the state expertly wielded by vladimir putin should give one pause. it's not just that putin has been able to reconstitute the apparatus of fear from the soviet days, it's also about money. the russian state has at its disposal the greatest natural

resources of any country in the world -- oil, gas, diamonds, nickel, copper, aluminum. those riches give the government the ability to both repress and bribe its population. consider this fact -- despite the sweep and force of the arab spring, it has not produced political change in a single oil-rich country. the revolution started in the deserts of the maghreb in tunisia. morocco was quickly swept along. but next door sits algeria, more repressive than either of them, and yet untouched by protests. it might be called the arab spring but it began a year and a half earlier in a non-arab country, iran, when the green movement took to the streets. but the iranian regime which buys support with patronage and represses with its military resistance. the states have resisted the winds of change, even in bahrain where the opposition enjoys strong support. if russia's civil society can produce even modest changes against these odds, it will rewrite history. for more on this, you can read

my column in this week's "time" magazine. let's get started. ♪ joining me now from kabul, the president of afghanistan, hamid karzai. president karzai, thank you very much for joining me. >> welcome. good to talk to you. >> the secretary of defense, leon panetta, recently said nato forces, the international coalition, is winning in afghanistan. do you believe that is an accurate statement? >> well, the international coalition and the afghan government have been able to provide in the past ten years political stability to

afghanistan. the overall stability of afghanistan and the presence of afghanistan as a state, as a nation state, in the international community. but we have not been able, the united states and afghanistan government together, have not been able to provide the people with their individual personal security. that is yet to come. >> do you believe that you have broken some of the momentum that the taliban had gained in previous years? that 2011 has marked a shift in that regard? >> i can say that this year in terms of the overall mobility and activity of the taliban and other groups has been slower,

and we have been more effective. but i'll have to wait a bit longer to confirm that we have reversed the trend and that the afghan people will see the fruits of our efforts and see peace and further security. >> now in iraq as you know, american forces are going down essentially to zero. but that is not what your plan is for the relationship between afghanistan and the united states. am i correct, you would like to see a residual american force? >> we are negotiating with the united states toward enduring partnership. that may bring about the presence of some u.s. troops in afghanistan for the duration of the agreement that we reach with support to afghanistan, with training and equipping the

afghan forces, all of that will be there. but we'll have to wait for the agreement and the specifics of it. >> the one area where you have had a great deal of criticism for nato forces and for the united states has been the so-called night raids. the admiral, former admiral william mcraven says they are essential and important. you say that this is what is feeding the hostility to foreign forces. where do things stand? do you have a commitment from the united states that these night raids will end or not? >> well, this has been one of the issues between us for a long time. something that we have raised an objection to for almost eight years now. we want afghanistan's homes, afghanistan's villages, to be protected, to be safe from such attacks. that understanding is there, but the specifics of these operations have not been

developed yet. but what we are asking for in very specific and clear terms, that is no foreign forces should enter afghan homes. >> let me ask you about the political settlement that needs to come it in order for some of the violence to decline. you have said that the negotiations with the taliban have essentially come to a standstill ever since the murder, the assassination of mr. rabbani, who was your negotiator. and something in an vancouver that i thought was absolutely striking, is that you said, look, we don't know whom to negotiate with, we don't know whom the right person is. we don't have contact with the taliban. the pakistani government is the

only group that has contact with them. they have to tell us whom to negotiate with. is it really from your experience, is it pretty clear that at the end of the day it is the pakistani government that has that kind of connection with the taliban? >> well, our efforts for peace, our cries for peace, our understanding of peace was that we were talking to the taliban. the assassination of president rabbani brought us in a shock to the recognition that we were actually talking to nobody. that those who came in the name of the peace process were assassins, were killers, were terrorists rather than negotiators.

a man who came in the name of a messenger for peace turned out to be a suicide bomber. therefore, we have now clearly said that we will welcome a taliban address, but that address must have the clarity that this representative is authorized and is representing the taliban movement as we see it. the question of pakistan is important here because we all know that the taliban have their places there. they operate from there. and a meaningful peace process cannot go well or end in satisfactory results without pakistan's participation and help. >> let me tell you, mr. president, about an interview i did with former president musharraf a few months ago. i asked him specifically about whether or not he believed that you were somebody who could be

partnered with and trusted. and as you know, he is still quite influential within the pakistani military establishment. and he essentially said no. what would be your response to that? >> well, i -- i said pakistan is a twin brother, and president musharraf when he was the president had a fairly good working relationship with us. and i have respect for him. and i think the trust between the two nations is something that's the verdict of -- of history and one that we need to have among us. >> you're a better diplomat than he is, mr. president. >> oh, i'm -- he's a capable person, too. very capable. >> mr. president, if you could just hold on a minute, we will be back. and when we're back, we will

have more of this conversation with president hamid karzai about afghanistan, pakistan, the american drawdown. but also a troubling case -- a woman who was raped and then sentenced to 12 years for being the victim of a rape. when we come back. there are people in afghanistan who believe this woman should marry the man who raped her. do you think that that is appropriate? [ female announcer ] help i need a holiday party idea. mmm... pillsbury crescent wrapped brie just unroll, wrap the brie and bake. it's so easy. now this might even impress aunt martha. pillsbury crescent wrapped brie. holiday ideas made easy.

pillsbury crescent wrapped brie. everyone believes in keeping their promises once a year. but we believe in helping people take steps to keep them every single day. that's why every day we help people across the country get into their first homes. prepare for a comfortable retirement and protect the people and things that matter most. at genworth we believe every day is the right day to take a step toward tomorrow. [♪...] >> male announcer: book now, save up to 65%. call 1-800-sandals.

and we are back. joining me from kabul, the president of afghanistan, hamid karzai. do you worry that you're in a new and dangerous spiral with this most recent attack on afghanistan's shia population? the terrible terrorist attack which appears again to be traced back to pakistan. in fact, the pakistani group has taken credit for it. this is new as far as i can tell -- a very marked sectarian attack on afghanistan, on the shia population in afghanistan. is this -- you know, is this a

portend for something worse to come? >> the attack on our people by the group a few days ago was a clear act of terrorism against people. it was anti-islam. it was anti-human being. afghanistan has evidence in history -- this was the first time in our country that an attack of that nature took place. the taliban condemned it. but reportedly the group claimed responsible. we're not saying that this is pakistan. we say that this is the terrorist group. if it is, then perhaps it's the responsibility of pakistan and

all all of us together to stop this. >> there's a woman named gulnaz who, as you know, was sentenced to prison for 12 years after it was reported that her cousin's husband raped her. she was then freed because of your personal action. the great concern of human rights activists in the west and in afghanistan i should say is that particularly once the international forces withdraw and perhaps have less of a day-to-day involvement, that these kind of events will happen day after day after day in afghanistan. why is this kind of thing happening in afghanistan? >> well, when i came to know this and upon coming to know of this, i convened a judicial meeting in which the issue was discussed in detail and the right inquiries made. we -- on advice from the chief

justice and administrative justice we decided this was a case of, perhaps, misjudgment. and that it has to be resolved and resolved by giving her a pardon immediately. that's what i did. >> there are people in afghanistan -- >> to the future, i can assure -- to the future, to the future i can assure you that afghanistan has a long tradition of judicial applications. it's a country that has been troubled a lot, but it is also an old country with -- with laws and a penal code and judicial history. i can assure you that once the international forces are withdrawn and not as many as they are today, afghanistan will

neither go to a trouble within the country or strive to miscarriage of justice. i can assure of that. >> there are people in afghanistan who believe this woman, gulnaz, should marry the man who raped her. do you think that that is appropriate? >> well, it's her choice. it's up to her to decide who to marry and who not to marry. >> mr. president -- >> and islam gives her that right. >> let me ask you finally, mr. president, 2014 is not just the date that is slated for the drawdown of foreign forces, it is also the date that your presidency expires. what is going to happen then to hamid karzai? will you run again? >> no, i will not run again.

it is against our constitution. elections will be there, and a new president will be elected by the afghan people, and i will live as a former president and a citizen of afghanistan. >> you will live in afghanistan? >> absolutely. >> and do you believe -- >> this is my home. >> and do you believe by that time there will be some deal with the taliban? that their will be some kind of political settlement? >> i hope so. i hope so. i hope very, very much. that's what i've been working on with great dedication for the last many years. i hope that will be the case, and i hope we'll have a complete peace in this country. >> president karzai, as always, a pleasure. >> great pleasure to talk to you. all the best wishes. >> thank you. [ chanting ] tdd# 1-800-345-2550 let's talk about fees.

tdd# 1-800-345-2550 there are atm fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 account service fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and the most dreaded fees of all, hidden fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 at charles schwab, you won't pay fees on top of fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no monthly account service fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 no hidden fees. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 and we rebate every atm fee. tdd# 1-800-345-2550 so talk to chuck tdd# 1-800-345-2550 because when it comes to talking, there is no fee. but proven technologies allow natural gas producers to supply affordable, cleaner energy, while protecting our environment. across america, these technologies protect air - by monitoring air quality and reducing emissions... ...protect water - through conservation and self-contained recycling systems... ... and protect land - by reducing our footprint and respecting wildlife. america's natural gas... domestic, abundant, clean energy to power our lives... that's smarter power today.

[ gargling ] oo-ay-ow. savings. savings. savings? progressive was the first to offer online quoting. you can do better. first to show comparison rates. ding! the "name your price" tool. oh! gosh, don't mind if i do. who was the first to offer pet injury coverage? we were. and when did you know you wanted to sell insurance? i said i wouldn't cry. um... whee! it's flo time. now, that's progressive. call or click today.

last week marked exactly ten years since the term "bric" was coined. the catchy acronym for brazil, russia, india, and china used to describe the new powerhouse emerging markets. but the man who invented the moniker now says one of the four

has been a great disappointment. no, not russia with all its recent troubles, not brazil whose economy contracted in the last quarter, and certainly not china which continues to power on. goldman sachs' jim o'neil says the country that has been the biggest letdown has been india. he pointed out last week that india's inability to attract foreign investment could actually lead to a balance of payments crisis. from bric to basket case, what in the world is going on? some numbers tell a troubling story. growth has dipped to 7% for the first time in two years. the indian rupee is asia's worst performing currency this year, falling to a historic low against the dollar. india's deficits are soaring, and funding is drying up. india received less than $20 billion in foreign direct investment in the first six months of 2011. china got three times that amount.

even russia with the smaller gdp took in more. why is india struggling? sadly, the real problem isn't economics. india has a very dynamic private sector, probably the most dynamic in the emerging markets. but it has a government that simply doesn't work. and it's not for lack of knowledge. india has the know-how. the government is, after all, led by a reform-minded world-class economist, prime minister singh. the problem is politics. the world's largest democracy seems to be paralyzed. singh's government recently announced a plan to open up india's retail sector to foreign investors. a continuation of the reforms that jump-started the economy 20 years ago. the proposal would have made it easier for big western chains like walmart to set up shop in india. now indian agriculture is hugely inefficient. middlemen take huge cuts. and because supply chains are inefficient, up to 1/3 of farm products, vegetables for

example, rot before they reach the market. so the walmart model would transform india's agriculture and its retail sectors. it would empower farmers, lower prices for consumers, and create huge gains in productivity. but it was not to be. india's opposition turned this into a story of the big guy fighting the little guy, walmart versus the mom and pop. parliament was gridlocked for days, and politicians mobilized mass demonstrations. [ chanting ] >> small stores across the country were kept closed and in protest. so what does the government do? instead of standing firm, it backtracked and canceled plans to reform the retail sector altogether. this is a depressingly familiar pattern. for two years now, india's government has done nothing, hanging on to power, presenting no plans to open up the economy, raise living standards, build infrastructure, or attract new investment. in the west, india's leaders sell the story of a dynamic, incredible india. ♪ india

♪ incredible india >> but at home, they pander to populist protectionist sentiment and dole out subsidies and do basically nothing. and that paralysis is hurting the economy. india's blessing and curse is that it has a messy, chaotic, decentralized democracy. unlike china, it has no unified sense of direction. but the prevailing view has often been that when the going gets tough, new delhi gets its act together. that's what it did 20 years ago when it was on the brink of defaulting in a balance of payments crisis. well, this time once again, it's time for urgent reform. new delhi has for years expressed pride in being part of the brics. well, if it doesn't get its act together, ten years from now, people might still be praising the brics except that the "i" in bric might stand for indonesia, not india. and we'll be back. we have an all-star panel

looking at american politics, russia's protests, and europe's woes. stay with us. ♪ now i'm a geologist at chevron, and i get to help science teachers. it has four servo motors and a wireless microcontroller. over the last three years we've put nearly 100 million dollars into american education. that's thousands of kids learning to love science. ♪ isn't that cool? and that's pretty cool. ♪ ♪ ♪ mom? dad? guys? [ engine turns over ] [ engine revs ] ♪ he'll be fine. [ male announcer ] more people are leaving bmw, mercedes, and lexus for audi than ever before. take advantage of exceptional values during the season of audi event.

there's much to talk about around the world, so let's get straight to our panel today.

joining me, author, reporter, radio host, curt anderson, who wrote the cover story for this week's "time" person of the year cover. david remnick, peggy noonan, and gillian tett. welcome to all of you. we have to start with newt. >> newt who? >> peggy, you had a column. you talk about a friend of yours who devises bumper sticker for states and had a bumper sticker that said, "california: it's all true," meaning everything you hear about california is all true. your bumper sticker is "newt: it's all true." explain. >> he's a various sort of character. there's a lot going on there. you ask is this man experienced and accomplished? yes. is he intelligent? yes. is he erratic? yes. is he herky-jerky and drawn to

eccentric, arguably, ideas? yes? has he had success? yes. failure? >> yes. there's a lot going on there. it's a very dramatic package. in a way, i think he's the first possible president about whom too much is known. normtly we don't know enough, but this is a lot of information. >> those things we don't know, his personal life, akaye ottawaic intellectual life, his quickness on the debate stand, is any of it disqualifying? you watch that last debate and he tore guts out of romney when he said of course you're not a career politician, you lost to ted kennedy in 1994. good point. and then at the same time he says the palestinians are an invented people, which is a really slimy remark. we're all invented peoples, most of us on this globe -- americans, israelis, palestinians. he knows that. but he's doing something

extremely cynical. he's full of these moves. the question is is he really emerging as somebody truly popular, or does the republican party just putting up one non-romney after another? i think it's the latter. >> let me make the case for newt, which is -- >> good luck. >> -- which is he is intelligent, he is attracted to a lot of ideas, a lot of them, by the way, that are not particularly friendly on the right. i think the right will be surprised the more they look into all the things he's been fascinated by. he has an eclectic mind. this guy spent 15 years on the national stage. >> but he has a third-rate temperament. >> he's weathered it off. how do you manage to do it? how many former speakers do you know who are still at the center of american political life? this guy has managed to endure through all that. i mean, he's written books -- >> and i think the embrace of newt is also evidence for this yearning for something that looks authentic and something that surprises occasionally as opposed, say, to mitt romney,

the robo candidate presumptive. >> when newt makes a gaffe, his views on immigration, it's never that he's trying to banter. it's actually the opposite. he's expressing his own views, you know they're heart felt, but he's -- >> no. he's panhandlering plenty. the palestinians as an invented people was panhandler to a certain part of the base. the immigration stuff. it's all thought through. i think newt always thinks, like our current president, that he's playing a higher, longer game. and i think that in a way that can bullocks him up. i don't think it's necessarily so genuine. >> the issue is whether american people are looking for ideas or execution, because newt is clearly an ideas machine. he's very entertaining. but at the end of the day, america is facing huge challenges which actually require execution. and that really is what the contest between romney and newt's about right now. >> i'm not even sure their ideas

are similar. the consistency is not there. the ideas are not carried through. if you do a catalog of his ideas over time, they include health healing chairs and honeymoons on mars and a lot of other bizarre-o things that i don't think the american people, when they're judge ing who they want to be president of the united states, are going to think of as ideas that have anything to do with anything. >> so one point of the republican primary that also interested me is the search for a way to attack obama on foreign policy. and it's been tough because, you know, osama bin laden and gadhafi and, you know, the move -- the trip to asia seemed to go well. so israel has become this one area where you can show this, you know, undying fealty, this moment where in the republican debate they each -- in the conference, the republican jewish conference, they're each trying to show just how committed they were, and michele bachmann trumps them all saying i went to a kibbutz when i was

18 years old. >> a socialist experiment, i might remind her. as a jewish american, i find it disgusting. i know what he's going after. he's going after a small slice of jewish americans who donate to political campaigns and also to christian evangelicals. the signaling is obvious. what they're doing is obvious. but what they're describing in terms of the state of palestinian israeli conflict has no bearing on reality whatsoe r whatsoever. it's ignorance combined with cynical politics and irrelevance. it's really awful. it's really awful. >> do you agree? >> yeah, i do. >> jillian? >> i do. i think actually, given the current mood in iran at the moment and what's happening elsewhere in the region, that kind of rhetoric is likely to become more and more relevant going forward. >> the other place i notice this is some traction is iran. there's this feeling again, i think somewhat unrealistically, we're going to be tough on iran so gingrich says he wouldn't

bomb iran but he would effect regime change. good luck. >> good luck. look, ideas are one thing. knowing about complexity and dealing with complexity is quite another. i think president obama knows very, very well that this campaign is not going to be about foreign policy. it's just not. it's about the economy, the economy, the economy and who you want your living room, as bill clinton famously said, for the next four years. that's it. that's where the race is won and lost, not foreign policy. >> and the foreign policy choices right now across the middle east are complex and subtle. like hollywood, the good guys, the bad guys, the islamists, the americans, the west, the east, and there's really breaking down. someone like egypt right now is absolutely highlighting the complexity and subtlety of these choices because not only do you have the muslim brotherhood that's recently come through very strong anily in pools, but you also have the salafi, a potential radical group of islamists, coming up.

what should american do when it looks at what's happening in egypt today? there's no set of good guys to cheer for. >> at the same time, considering how really we're essentially beyond some lines, ignoring foreign policy, foreign policy has a way of rearing up and biting you and a way -- you know, when it's not expected, it's still huge. it's still important, and it is still an area where deep thought and sophistication are needed. >> and where the bipolar view that americans who don't really spend much time reading about, thinking about foreign policy has become less effectual than ever given what's happened in the last year. >> and in order to prove that we mean what we say, we are going to come back and discuss foreign policy and all things foreign, when we come back. it's so easy. now this might even impress aunt martha. pillsbury crescent wrapped brie. holiday ideas made easy.

long-lasting, too. yeah, i could really use this silverado. deer. fish. fantastic. ♪ this holiday, chevy's giving more. now qualified buyers can get 0% apr for 72 months on a 2011 chevy silverado. or 0% apr financing for 60 months plus no monthly payments until spring. ♪ at liberty mutual, we know how much you count on your car and how much the people in your life count on you. that's why we offer accident forgiveness, man: good job. where your price won't increase due to your first accident. we also offer a hassle-free lifetime repair guarantee, where the repairs made on your car are guaranteed for life or they're on us. these are just two of the valuable features

you can expect from liberty mutual. plus, when you insure both your home and car with us, it could save you time and money. at liberty mutual, we help you move on with your life. so get the insurance responsible drivers like you deserve. looks really good. call us at... or visit your local liberty mutual office, where an agent can help you find the policy that's right for you. liberty mutual insurance. responsibility. what's your policy?

and we are back with curt anderson, peggy noonan, david recommend nick, and julian tett. julia, is europe going to blow up? the f stshgs the font of all thing things financial. they've been able to get three governments replaced in spain,

ita italy, and greece. they've gotten almost every other european country other than britain to sign onto the tighter fiscal union. will that stop a crisis? don't they soon need some kind of -- at the end of the day, the federal reserve stopped the crisis in the united states, said we just sort of guarantee everything. do you need that move the take place? >> well, i don't think europe is about to blow up right now, but i think it's going to be smoldering dangerously for a long time, because essentially the germans are certainly exerting more and more authority over the area, and they have got some of what they want, but they haven't got enough to actually create a proper fiscal union of the sort that most economists think is really needed now to make the eurozone work. and you've still got a lot of tension between different countries. you've still got a lot of the resistance inside the ecb to doing what this m people think it should do, which is namely monetize, really step in and support the program. so there are many, many questions out there, and unfortunately that's going to continue probably until at least

march when they're supposed to be creating new institutions which will essentially be funding a lot of the overhaul. so it's very nasty. >> but will the markets wait until march, for the schedule? >> that is a crucial question, because never mind what the equity market is doing or the euro. the really important thing is that deep inside the cogs of the european financial system right now, the machine, things are gumming up very dramatically. and banks are finding it hard to get funds and going to have to raise a lot of money early next year. european governments are going to have to borrow a lot of money. the cost of borrowing has just jumped for italy above a tlaefl's symbolically dangerous. so there is real concern the cogs in the machine will gum up and actually force some kind of resolution sooner or later. >> do you imagine there won't be some big event that makes things fall or makes things happen but some small, obscure thing on a thursday morning that will siddenly make everything trip in a bad way in europe?

>> i think it could -- >> that's my anxiety. >> people are exhausted. i mean, people have been marched up and down the euro zone hill now dozens of times. think about the summit, the crises. this endless game of brinksmanship going on when people keep threatening thing and going to the brink and pulling back. so traders are exhausted, bankers are exhausted, politicians are exhausted. and those are risks that we'll get to, say, two days after christmas when everyone's supposedly on holiday, particularly the euro zone, and something nasty will happen. >> kurt, i have to ask you about your wonderful cover story -- >> thank you. >> so do you think that what we are witnessing right now is a kind of generalized uprising of young people, or is it -- why are so many people getting uppity all at the same time? >> well, it's hard to think that it isn't some -- a social network contagion. and i don't mean a social network in the necessarily in the new facebook/twitter sense. but in the sociological sense that has been for some time. you know, it overwhelmingly, in protest after protest --

obviously the stakes are different in syria than they are in oakland. but they are by and large middle-class people. the more educated members of their society who are -- have reached a sense of grimness about the prospects of their country, their democracies, their personal likeliho livelihoods and decided in this contagious way to get off the couch and take out the earplugs and express complaints out in the streets. >> what do you think? is it -- what i'm struck by is it's happening in dictatorships, but it's happening in democracies. lots of established democracies. >> yes. i think we're in an age of -- we both know this and don't notice it fully. we're in an age of the overthrow of establishments, period. as americans, we are always moved by the stirrings of others toward freedom, and we

understand what's going on in america against establishments. but it is also true, and my great concern is that this inherently makes the world less stable. i am old enough -- maybe we all are, too, to appreciate stability. particularly in the age we're living in with extraordinary weapons and independent actors and free agents of all sorts. it seems there's a difference in desire for liberation and the desire to make change and the desire in an unstable feeling world to keep things as stable as possible. it's a funny tension that's being worked out every day. >> the tension of history for the last 200 years. ? and more. but i think destabilization can be thrilling and useful and necessary. if we're destabilizing the idea of a radical income equality in the united states of america, if

we're destabilizing the idea in russia of brutal authoritarian rule, if we're destabilizing the idea of a rule of egypt, et cetera, then that kind of destabilization as perilous as it can be in the short term, unnerving to some in the short term, is necessary and real and right. >> yeah, but there's a little rough beast that's our come around at last -- >> well, the rough beast in russia, where i just was, is to have 50,000 people on the streets protesting against a cleptocracy at the top -- >> sure -- >> about somebody who -- >> a repressive bullying regime. >> it's absolutely necessary. necessary. you know what the motto is in russia on the streets? evolution, not revolution. >> and that is a critical issue because it's better to have constant small adjustments rather than to try and repress change in the name of stability. and eventually you create more instability when there's an

explosion. you've seen that -- exactly. >> yes. there's a whole range of rhetoric on the street. but in the end, what this did was reawaken the people that needed reawakening, all of us, on what has happened to our country in terms of radical income in equality. >> and by the way, here as in europe, no one-size-fits-all silver bullet marxist dream is being proposed to solve the problems. which is one of the heartening things. >> the fact that people on the street are reading jizac or gramshi, whoever it may be -- >> and ron paul -- >> nine -- fine. i don't think we'll see that revolution in the united states of america. if we do see increasingly legislation and a political awareness that leads to the change in what we're talking about, that is all to the good. and who else was doing it before occupy wall street? >> and coming to david's point. in the case in russia, you do have quite a rag-tag group of

people who were actually coming out at the moment. but they are to a surprising degree, middle class, whatthey -- the cultured people that want to be engaged and it's welcome, they're getting involved and asking for evolution if you like in terms of political development. >> and on that note, we're going to have to end. thank you very much. kurt anderson, gillian tett, david remnick, peggy noonan. pop quiz, what was the poem that peggy was quoting. go to our web site to get the answer. we will be back. all energy development comes with some risk, but proven technologies allow natural gas producers to supply affordable, cleaner energy, while protecting our environment. across america, these technologies protect air - by monitoring air quality and reducing emissions... ...protect water - through conservation and self-contained recycling systems... ... and protect land - by reducing our footprint and respecting wildlife. america's natural gas... domestic, abundant, clean energy to power our lives...

that's smarter power today. domestic, abundant, clean energy to power our lives... ♪ when the things that you need come at just the right speed, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ medicine that can't wait legal briefs there by eight, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ freight for you, box for me box that keeps you healthy, that's logistics. ♪ ♪ saving time, cutting stress, when you use ups that's logistics. ♪

our question this week from the "gps" challenge -- which country crowned a new king last week? is it, a, bhutan, b, malaysia, c, tonga, d, liechtenstein? stay tuned and we'll tell you the correct answer. go to cnn.com/gps for ten more questions. while you're there, check out our web site, the globalpublicsquare. find interviews and takes by our experts refreshed every day. don't forget, you can follow us on twitter and facebook. this week's book of the week is steven koch's "struggle for egypt."

a sweeping smart history of egypt with a vivid final chapter describing the country's revolution. the single best book to read about egypt right now. i thought i knew a lot about the country. i learned a lot reading this book. now for the "last look." when you send 1.5 million soldiers through a war zone, when you spend $800 billion on an effort, when you have 505 military bases or outposts in a country, when you have untold tens of millions of pieces of equipment in the nation, moving day is going to be even more challenging than it usually is. and so it is as the u.s. military pulls out of iraq. some of the bases are being retrofitted for civilian use. camp was once a detention center and now it's a hotel. i like how they decorated it with the barbed wire. nice touch. much of the equipment wasn't worth shipping back. some of it has been sold. there was apparently ample interest from neighboring

nations in surplus u.s. military equipment. and some of it by a recent count, 2.4 million pieces of equipment worth at least $250 million have just been given away to the iraqis. but there's one piece that is not being left behind. this is the prison cell where saddam hussein was held until he was hanged. and you see the dings in the back wall -- that's where his toilet was. that artifact bizarrely is being proudly brought to america where apparently it will be displayed in a museum. for this week's "gps" challenge question, we asked you which country crowned a new king last week. the correct answer was b, malaysia. the 48-year-old ascended the throne this week. second stint as a king. the first was in the 1970s. malaysia has a unique system where nine hereditary state rulers take turns as the country's king for five-year terms. go to our web site for ten more challenging questions. thanks to all of you for being

part of my program this week. i will see you next week. hello, everyone. i'm fredricka whitfield. is. >> the number of american combat troops now in iraq, zero. this morning the remaining american units deployed to iraq, drove across the border into kuwait in a convoy. that ended the largest u.s. military withdraw since vietnam. no end to the payroll tax debate. the u.s. senate passed a two month extension yesterday, but don't expect a rubber stamp from the u.s. house. speaker john boehner accuses the senate of kicking the can down the road and he says he's holding out for full year extension. the house takes up the senate bill tomorrow. and a major snowstorm is brewing in the southwest just in time for the holidays. travel will become dangerous if not impossible across much of the region tomorrow. some plas