can we vote our way to a better economy? welcome to "your money." i'm ali velshi. we are looking ahead to super tuesday. ten states from all across the country are heading to the polls. economic conditions vary greatly from state to state. let's take a look at a few. vermont's unemployment rate is

at 5.1%. that is much lower than the 8.3% national average. in january, only one in about 21,000 homes in vermont were in the foreclosure process. a very different picture in ohio. unemployment much higher there, 8.1%, though lower than the national average. 1 in 616 homes is in foreclosure in ohio. in georgia, it's seen some of the worst numbers. unemployment there, 9.7%. higher than the national average. 1 in 328 homes are in the foreclosure process in georgia. cnn's chief national correspondent john king joins us now. he hosts "john king usa" week nights as 6:00 p.m. eastern. as if john king needs an introduction to anybody who watches tv. john, as we just pointed out, we just pointed out three states. every state has a different economy. so what economic issues are going to be the most important both in super tuesday and in the election?

>> ali, you make a very critical point going state by state because we often look at national polling and look at national numbers like the unemployment rate, like gdp and say the economy is doing better or doing worse or pick the national number. presidential elections are decided not just the nominating process, the general elections state by state. you just pointed ohio, a state still struggling. unemployment in the 8% range, the industrial base. move over, go to pennsylvania, go to michigan, some of the big electoral battle grounds are the states hit the hardest in the recession and having the hardest time coming back. it's better now than it was a year ago but it's still a struggle. go to nevada, a small state in the electoral college but swing state in presidential politics. enormous in foreclosures and housing crisis. if you're in ohio or michigan, it's probably manufacturing, made in america, what can we do to get jobs back? if you're in arizona, nevada or florida, what about housing kicks in as well. you have to go state by state. can you vote your way to a better economy? i don't mean this disrespect fully.

a lot of voters thought that voting for president obama four years ago and it's been tough. he will make the case things are better and that will be the defining debate of the election. >> but that is the key question in this discussion right now. by the way, you don't need the promo john, but on super tuesday, you want to be looking at watching cnn for the results, only because john, i think it's weird how you know the details not only of states but within states and down to the county level in terms of the economy. i learn a lot from you. stay right there, john. harvard university professor ken rogoff is the former chief economist with the international monetary fund. ken, i spoke with lochman. you and he and i have spoken before about whether we're in a recession, out of it. he's coat founder of the economic cycle research institute, one of the best predictors of the business cycle. he says despite all of the positive indicators that we've seen recently, remember, four years ago there weren't these state-by-state disparities generally, it was all bad. some were worse than others.

this economy, the one that we think is headed into a recovery or in a recovery, he says it's headed for another recession. listen to what he told me. >> even with the firming in jobs growth which we fully acknowledge and include in our activity, we still have on balance the definitive hard data, not a forecast, showing us that the economy is actually still slowing, which is the direction that you go in when you're heading towards a recession. >> so he says definitive data, not a forecast. he makes these calls by studying the business cycle, which he said operates largely outside of the realm of politics. he admits that politics can influence it by things like stimulus, but largely he says a business cycle is a business cycle. ken, is there a contradiction in what he says for those americans who want to vote on the economy? is he basically saying it can't have much to do with it? >> well, i think the president and the congress definitely set

the tone for where the country is headed over the long run. in the short run, there's much less they can do. we're in the aftermath of a deep financial crisis. in some ways we never left the recession. i don't agree with him that actually we're about to head for negative growth or about to start falling. i think we're probably steady at a low level now. but huge unemployment, a lot of problems to fix. >> the economics editor for "the economist" and ben bernanke said earlier this week that the job market remains, quote, far from normal. that's his words. and that stronger growth, stronger economic growth, usually what we refer to through gdp will be required to turn this around. now, we did have some positive gdp growth news this last week. take a look at it. in the fourth quarter of 2011, gdp is measured by quarter, every three months. that's the bar all the way to the right. gdp grew from the third quarter to the fourth quarter at a rate of 3%.

that is higher than initially estimated. it was supposed to be 2.8%. you can see that over the four quarters of 2011, makes up the entire year, growth steadily picked up. how do we keep gdp momentum going despite all of the threats out there from europe, from gas prices, from iran, what do we do? >> well, that's the big question. i think what we have to hope for is we don't have any new external shocks. i think there is a risk of that. the new risk is oil prices. there's also a risk we might mess thing up with policy domestically. if we tighten fiscal policy too much. but the hope is if we don't mess things up, that you gradually get some kind of momentum. as the labor market improves, people start to spend more and firms start to hire and you get a circle. there are some signs of confidence, consumer confidence is up, the stock market is doing much better, but i think it's a very, very fragile situation and i think ken is absolutely right that this is -- we're not going anywhere to a roaring recovery. as ben bernanke said, we need a lot more growth to get the

unemployment rate down. but i think in contrast perhaps to last year where we started off with high expectations and they were dashed, it does seem that there's some reason to hope that this time maybe we may be able to continue. >> robert schiller is a professor of economics at yale university. bob, you're not one known to be, can i use the words, irrationally exuberant about the economy, but let's talk about the things that are not working yet. if there's an area of the economy that you or politicians or candidates could fix, whether it be jobs, housing, oil prices, that would help create or continue the momentum that this recovery has, what would it be? can we even isolate one? >> well, i don't know. everything is interconnected in the economy. but of the things you mentioned, i think jobs are the most important issue because they underlie confidence and the kind of thing that would bring back entrepreneurship hiring, lending. we've seen increases in the consumer confidence indexes, but

i don't think that we're there yet. i'm not sure that these indexes measure what we want. we want to see people thinking we're safe now. our job is secure, we can spend money. if i'm an employer, i can hire people now. that's where i would put jobs first on your list. >> wf your areas of specialty, however, is housing. we've seen new data from you that indicated that in 2011 we had remarkably low home prices. we hit another low. where do you think house prices are going, because obviously that's where so many people's savings are wrapped up and that will have an influence on how they feel about the economy and whether they're ready to spend more? >> well, you know, there's a lot of positive indicators. permits are up, starts are up, though more in multi-family. we have, as i said, confidence up. survey data of other sorts are suggesting the housing market should go up. but with our numbers, it keeps going down. and we have it down 4% in the last year.

it's a puzzle. you know, when i learned about forecasting home prices is that momentum matters more than anything else. >> interesting. >> and we still have downward momentum. >> and this is where the rub is, right, because we're all feeling relatively good about a lot of the economic indicators we have but he did have things to say about the economy generally and you have things to say about the housing market that say don't everybody get crazy just yet. let's talk about this in a second. the housing market, despite what rick santorum said, did start off the financial crisis. it did trigger it. next we're going to have the best solutions that my guests have heard for fixing that market going forward. stay with us. i'm good about washing my face.

but sometimes i wonder... what's left behind? [ female announcer ] purifying facial cleanser from neutrogena® naturals. removes 99% of dirt and toxins without dyes, parabens or harsh sulfates. so skin feels pure and healthy. [ female announcer ] from neutrogena® naturals.

oh there's tons. french presses, espresso tampers, filters. it can get really complicated. not nearly as complicated as shipping it though. i mean shipping is a hassle. not with priority mail flat rate boxes from the postal service. if it fits it ships, anywhere in the country for a low flat rate. that is easy. best news i've heard all day! i'm soooo amped! i mean not amped. excited. well, sort of amped. really kind of in between. have you ever thought about decaf? do you think that would help? yeah. priority mail flat rate shipping starts at just $5.15, only from the postal service. a simpler way to ship. i'm going to own my own restaurant. i want to be a volunteer firefighter. when i grow up, i want to write a novel. i want to go on a road trip. when i grow up, i'm going to go there. i want to fix up old houses. [ female announcer ] at aarp we believe you're never done growing. i want to fall in love again. [ female announcer ] discover what's next in your life. get this free travel bag when you join at aarp.org/jointoday.

on december 21st, polar shifts will reverse the earth's gravitational pull and hurtle us all into space, which would render retirement planning unnecessary. but say the sun rises on december 22nd and you still need to retire, td ameritrade's investment consultants can help you build a plan that fits your life. we'll even throw in up to $600 when you open a new account or roll over an old 401(k). so who's in control now, mayans? we teased you with this before the break. take a look at home prices over the last decade. if you have small children in

the room, tell them to look away from the tv. national home prices fell 4% last quarter to levels not seen since 2002. that's according to the s&p case schiller national home price index. the schiller is robert schiller we have on this panel. prices are down 33% from their peak in 2006. john king, looking at those housing numbers, we know that the jobs numbers have been looking better for the president in recent months. we know there has been 16 months of job growth. we've got a couple problems here. we've got an oil price, gas price thing which some say could derail our recovery. and we have this stubborn, strangely stubborn housing situation. tell me how that plays out for president obama, who was kind of hoping that he's going to get some momentum and go into the campaign saying, hey, things aren't that bad under me. >> ali, when you travel, the psychology of the housing market is fascinating. this was a big part of consumer confidence. this is a consumer-spending driven economy. people thought their home values were going up. they looked around the

neighborhood and everybody's home values were going up. that doesn't exist anymore. most states i visited the prices aren't better so people aren't feeling better about their personal nest egg. maybe it was a mistake to think of your house as a big maybe people will rethink that. it's a generational question. but when you see them now, they are still very uncertain about where this housing market is going. you've seen the administration, three, four, maybe five times rejigger their programs trying to help people under water. you've had a big debate in the republican campaign versus the democrats, mitt romney saying the market has to fix this without that much government intervention. there's great uncertainty. if you're the consumer who used to look at your house value going up every year as part of your confidence, guess what, you don't have that and that psychology affects politics, trust me. >> so you're talking about the psychology of housing, bob schiller talking about the momentum. these are the nonsign it tivg side. you think, john, it may have been a mistake to use your home as a nest egg. that probably would have been

only one of several mistakes in the housing sector. the other was getting involved in loans and being sold loans that you weren't able to afford. the other one was the housing valuations that didn't make sense. and then the big mistake i would say is the fact that lenders and banks have not done the right thing in the last few years to try to keep the situation from getting worse unless forced to by government regulators. when it comes to the housing market, we understand the multitude of problems. on this show we want to talk about solutions. robert schiller has written about an idea that we describe as kind of like a prenuptial agreement for mortgages. now, the idea is that if a home's value drops below a set level, the mortgage would automatically reset to a predetermined payment. bob, can this help stabilize the housing market going forward? does it fix problems we already have? or is it something we should implement for mortgages from here on in? >> well, it doesn't immediately fix the fact that we have these foreclosures in the pipeline. this is a new kind of mortgage. but it is something. you know, dodd-frank called for a study on what they said were

shared appreciation mortgages which is something similar. i think this is a time to reconsider our home mortgage institutions. we got into this crisis because we had most homeowners putting themselves in a leveraged, undiversified portfolio. they put their entire life savings in a house in one city and leveraged it. boy, is that asking for trouble. it's elementary finance. don't do that. we have to change our institutions that make it easier for people to do something more sensible. >> ken, what do you think of this idea? >> i couldn't agree with what bob said more. you don't want to put all your eggs in one basket. people put more than 100% of their eggs in one basket in their house. we need to give them mortgages, shared appreciation mortgages where they give up some of the upside, but some of the downside. the prenup specifically, one of the problems and why it hasn't happened is they aren't always enforceable in court, as people know, so the government really has to provide a firm way that

this can work. >> zanny, what's the best solution that you've heard to the housing crisis? >> well, i think the idea the professor put forward is very good going forward, it makes a lot of sense. i think the thing to realize now is that there isn't actually a single magic bullet. one of the reasons so little has happened is because there's drawbacks and downsides to all the attempts to deal with the housing market. so all the efforts of loan maude modifications have run into trouble, whether it's regulatory trouble, whether it's too expensive. but one of the things that hasn't been focused on enough that's worth looking at is the encouraging single family homes to move into the rental market, to make it easier for investors to buy up a lot of them and rent them out. we're actually seeing a recovery in the rental market and people want to rent. there's a lot of people who before the crash were able to qualify for mortgages who now really can't, so we have a huge increase in the demand for rentals. so something there i think would be useful. the other thing which i think is less popular, i think there's a

tendency to think that it's great to keep people in their houses for as long as possible and to make foreclosure as hard as possible. and paradoxically i think that means it does take longer for the market to clear and putting a lot of barriers into that process isn't happening. >> let me understand this letting the market clear. we'd all like to know what a house is actually worth in america and no one really knows. bob schiller, you know, john king knows that ron paul continues to do particularly well in this primary season, and one of his arguments are -- is to let it clear. foreclose on everybody who needs to be foreclosed on. get the government out of subsidizing mortgages. get rid of the mortgage interest credit and let house prices go where they may. in fairness to ron paul, he's been saying this forever. your thoughts. >> well, i think that there's a legitimate argument that homeownership promotes good citizenship, a feeling of connectedness. it's an american tradition too. it's part of our capitalist values.

but i think that government role in subsidizing housing for the long run perhaps should be limited to marginal home buyers. you know, people who are struggling to be part of the middle class. and i think it is a good thing to give them a subsidy. it creates positive externalities for all of us. fannie and freddie should lower their conforming loan limits so they're not subsidiing big mcmansions. >> john king this is interesting watching how this plays out. there's a remarkable piece of the republican primary electorate out there supporting not just ron paul but these independent ideas, these libertarian ideas to get the government out of all of this. do you think there's a real understanding when it comes to getting government out of subsidies and regulations that voters have that this may be economically prudent over the long term and help us clear out the system, but home prices could collapse as a result? >> i don't think there's a deep enough understanding of the

potential consequences, because we're not having that conversation. but we are having a pretty sharp conversation and this is one of the problems. in divided government, especially when the republicans won the last election, attacking big institutions, attacking the bailout, attacking government itself and the role of government, you have a campaign now that is defined on big questions. what should the government do, what shouldn't the government do. what has the government done in the past that is a big mistake, not what are we going to do tomorrow. not how are we going to clean up this mess. the lack of trust in all big institutions. people don't trust the banks, people don't trust the government, people sometimes don't trust our business in the media. in that environment it's very hard to have a serious conversation as you have three people much smarter than me on this panel saying there's an upside to this, a downside to this. that's a conversation the country has to have and then make its choices. but we're not getting that conversation in the election because it's a much more pointed government is good, government is bad, it's not specific. >> that's why we like to have this sort of a conversation. sometimes the things we say on this show don't fit well onto a bumper sticker for somebody's campaign but they are important. john, thanks for breaking that down for us.

we'll watch you very closely over the next few days and into super tuesday. john king. bob schiller always a pleasure to have you here and thanks for your interesting idea about what we can do for the housing market. let's see if we can get some traction on ideas like that. ken and zahrani stick around. gas already above $4 in some states. we could see $5 a gallon gas by summer. those prices won't just hurt consumers, they could derail the entire economic recovery. we'll talk about that next on "your money." i'm serious, we compare our direct rates side by side to find you a great deal, even if it's not with us.

[ ding ] oh, that's helpful! well, our company does that, too. actually, we invented that. it's like a sauna in here. helping you save, even if it's not with us -- now, that's progressive! call or click today. no mas pantalones! that's why i take doctor recommended colace capsules. i have hemorrhoids and yes, i have constipation. that's why i take colace. [ male announcer ] for occasional constipation associated with certain medical conditions there's colace capsules. colace softens the stool and helps eliminate the need to strain. stimulant-free, comfortable relief. no wonder colace is the #1 stool softener brand recommended by doctors. say "yes" to colace! [ male announcer ] go to colacecapsules.com for savings.

welcome back to "your money." the u.s. economy is starting to actually feel like we're in a recovery and now a spike in gas prices threatens to derail that. signs of the u.s. well into a recovery are clear. gross domestic product, the broadest measure of the country's economy, grew 3% between the third and fourth quarters of 2011. consumer spending was up more than 2% over the same three-month time frame.

the u.s. unemployment rate dropped to 8.3% in january, and more importantly, the u.s. economy has been adding jobs for almost a year and a half. more than 1.8 million net new jobs were created in 2011 alone. new weekly filings for unemployment benefits are at lows not seen since 2008. and the s&p 500, the broadest measure of major u.s. listed companies, and the best reflection of invested u.s. retirement portfolios has rallied 25% from its low in october. the problem is oil is up 40% over the same period. economists and money manager steven leap is an expert on commodities. >> these green shoots could turn brown very, very quickly if oil let's say made a run to 140 or 150. >> lakshman achuthan has a group that tracks economic cycles and tracks businesses on them, has proven track record of forecasting economic cycles. he says the signs of economic

recovery are fool's gold. he predicts another u.s. recession possibly by summer. >> if we have another shock, like a spike in oil, what that can do is take what right now my best case scenario is a relatively mild recession, if we have a new shock on top of that scenario, it could take a mild recession and make it worse. and we saw an example of that in the last recession. >> so far u.s. gasoline prices are up 14% or 46 cents per gallon in 2012 alone. deutsche bank estimates every one-cent increase to u.s. gasoline costs american households $1.4 billion a year. and in a political season which is underscoring economic inequality in the u.s., economist steven leap fears higher prices at the pump will only make that problem worse. >> there are a massive number of people in this country, i would guess around 40% now, that are

really making choices involving food versus gasoline. >> so there's two distinct problems here. do we derail an economic recovery en masse and are the hardest in our economy going to get hit harder than society in general? ken and zanny are back with us. ken, americans depend on their cars to get around possibly more than other places in the world. we have created this entire society around the fact that it's acceptable to drive 30, 40, sometimes 50 miles each way to work. $4 gas is a reality in some places. prices could hit $5 by the summer driving season. at what point are you starting to worry about a spillover effect into the rest of the economy as we take that money away from the ability to be spent on other things? >> i don't think there's any question that there's some spillover effect already. it is a risk to the recovery, but i think it's a small risk until it spikes a lot more. but you mentioned inequality. i mean it's really rough on a lot of people. this is a recovery which has

been very unequal and gas prices really hit some people. they're struggling to try to make it. >> what's your sense of how bad -- when you say if it spikes, what are we worried about? if oil hit a. record in the 140s a few years ago, what will worry you and is it a matter of a number or the velocity? >> it's a matter of why. so if europe picks up and the u.s. picks up and china picks up and oil goes to 140 i wouldn't break a sweat at all. if, on the other hand, we have a big problem in the middle east and oil goes even higher than that, say to 180 or 200, that will be a problem. of course it's connected with a lot of other problems. but i think it would take a much bigger hike to really, really derail the recovery in a way you'd really feel. >> zanny, let's talk about solutions and this is a problem because the rest of the world gets kind of annoyed with americans complaining about gas at $4 a gallon. in the u.k., you know, when you transfer it over from liters and pounds, you end up well over $10 a gallon. but the difference is in the u.k. and europe and a whole lot

of other places, consumer and lifestyle behavior is not the same. how do americans adapt to what could be longer term gas prices? >> well, the interesting thing is if you look over the longer term, americans have been adapting to higher gas prices, driving more fuel efficient cars, driving smaller distances. but i think in the short term there's very little you can do to change behavior erratically. i think it's worth pointing out, i agree with ken, if oil spikes, particularly if it's a supply shock, it's a very worrying sign. but there are some factors this time around which are slightly different than when oil spiked last year or indeed in 2008 and that's this time natural gas prices are very low and it's been a very mild winter, so there are two other factors kind of counteracting and helping people's pocket books. i think that's one reason why consumer confidence is actually still very strong, that plus the labor market. so i think there seems to be -- you know, if you just look at the economics, it's obviously the change, how much more are you spending on gasoline means there's less to

spend elsewhere. there is, i think, some kindf threshold effect. that once gasoline prices go above a certain level, it really hits consumer confidence. you start feeling nervous. >> we saw that at $3.50 a gallon a few years ago where consumer behavior pushed people back from their trucks and into more fuel efficient cars. now the automakers are in a better position than they have been in before when there have been gas prices because they have more offerings that are more fuel efficient. but you're absolutely right, consumer behavior changes because of gas prices much more than it does because of conservation campaigns or taxes or cafe standards. thanks to both of you. what a great discussion. ken rogoff, zanny, we hope you'll come back again. the economics editor at the economist. when it comes to who or what is behind the rise in oil and gas prices, americans and politicians are quick to point a finger. the problem is they aren't pointing it in the right direction. i'll explain next on "your money." oooonn exextrtra a bubutttter titickcketets,s, s swon pepengnguiuin n jojouruy jujuninioror m minints momoviviefefononee evevilil p pririncncee

bobollllywywoooodd 3-3-dd shsharark k atattatack nened d ththe e hehead 5%5% c casashbhbacackk ririghght t nonow,w, g getet 5 k onon m movovieies.s. itit p payays s toto d di.

when it comes to high gas prices, the headlines tell the story. wall street greed, iran, spec laters, opinions on who or what is causing higher gas prices vary greatly, so what's the real story? and more importantly, what can actually be done about it? take a look. the price of a barrel of oil accounts for about three-quarters of a price of a gallon of gas, so a significant move up or down in oil prices should, within days, be reflected in prices at gas pumps worldwide.

u.s. crude has been getting more expensive. going from about $80 a barrel last october to about $110 a barrel now. that's an increase of 40% in just five months. but what americans may be seeing at the pump right now is gasoline catching up with the price of oil. gas prices are actually up only 9% since october, from $3.40 a gallon then to $3.70 a gallon now. if they had really tracked the price of oil, gasoline would be selling at a national average of $4.76 a gallon. but prices are higher and absent a clear and obvious culprit, americans and their politicians in this election year are pointing fingers. legendary oil investor t. boone pickens says blaming speculators is a tired old song. >> that's the first thing the politicians will say, the speculators are doing it. and when anybody comes out with that, it's the first reason and they can't give you any more to talk about than speculators, they don't know what they're

talking about. >> pickens says the mix of global demand and just the potential loss of the two million barrels per day that iran currently supplies the world has got investors worried. iran has threatened to shut down the strait of hormuz a choke-point on the eastern end of the gulf just 21 in miles wide at its narrowest point, through which an estimated one-fifth of the world's oil passes. but iran depends heavily on the revenues of that oil and may not want to jeopardize them. still companies like airlines that use oil speculate on it to use in businesses. hedge against price spikes. others, investors that will never need the oil invest for profit. behind the tension around iran and increased global demand for oil, the profiteers are betting there's no way oil prices will drop, but are they actually driving the price higher themselves? >> there isn't anybody running up the market on a speculative basis. the market is moving up because

the oil supplies are tight globally. from there you can goose it up a little bit, but not much. >> there may be another reason for the sudden gas price spike. u.s. oil production is up, but gasoline consumption is down, leaving the u.s. with more gas than it needs. so instead of excess gasoline driving prices down -- >> in the last six months, not only that we stopped importing gasoline, we're exporting gasoline. the total drop of supply of gasoline available to the consumer in the u.s. is down pie by about 1.5 million barrels a day. >> jeff reuben joins me now, an economist and the author of "why your world is about to get a whole lot smaller, oil and the globalization." jeff is in toronto where by the way one spends a lot more money for gasoline than they do in the united states. jeff, good to see you. you just heard america is not moving the needle on consumption. i mean the bottom line is it's been stagnant for a while.

might grow a little bit this year, might not, who knows. what's causing this? >> well, in fact, america has actually reduced its consumption of oil in the last five, six years by about two million barrels a day. unfortunately what's happening is that the rate of reduction of oil consumption in the united states and canada and europe is a fraction, only a fraction of the rate of increase of oil consumption in places like india and china, so that world demand keeps on growing. we're almost up around 90 million barrels a day. and while we can find supply to meet that demand, that supply only comes at triple-digit oil prices. >> all right. so let's talk about 1998 when oil was $12 a barrel. are we consuming ten times as much oil? what are the factors that make a $100 difference in a price of a barrel of oil? >> well, i'll give you an example.

like in the 1980s, china was consuming two million barrels a day. now it's consuming ten million barrels a day. india was one. now it's over three. so what we're seeing -- the same pattern that we saw in coal, 10, 15 years ago, just like the developing world has long surpassed the developed world in coil consumption, that's now happening in oil. >> you've got an idea, though, you've got a theory that at these high oil prices, at triple-digit oil prices, it may actually change not only u.s. lifestyle behavior, but it may change industrial behavior around the world. we may stop shipping expensive things around the world and we might become a little more local. do you still hold to that opinion? >> i do. and look at the surprising strength of the u.s. manufacturing sector and what has been on the whole a pretty modest and weak recovery. and i think what we're finding is that in a world of triple-digit oil prices, it doesn't make sense to access all our goods from halfway around the world, and that was what my

last book was about. i think the issue going forward and the issue that my new book will talk about is does triple-digit oil prices change the speed limit at which economies can grow. >> right. >> and i think we're finding the answer is the same from china to washington, and it's that the u.s. and chinese economy cannot grow at the same rate when oil is $120 a barrel as it was when oil was $20 to $30 a barrel. and neither zero interest rates nor a trillion dollar budget deficit is really going to be a substitute for the cheap oil that has driven economic growth. >> interesting theory, jeff. thanks very much. always a pleasure to talk to you. jeff rubin, an economist and an author. "why your world is about it to get a whole lot smaller oil and the end of globalization." coming up next, how you might actually benefit from higher oil prices. i have twins, 21 years old. each kid has their own path. they grow up, and they're out having their life. i really started to talk to them about the things that are important

that they have to take ownership over. my name's colleen stiles, and my kids and i did our wills on legalzoom. [ shapiro ] we created legalzoom to help you take care of the ones you love. go to legalzoom.com today and complete your will in minutes. at legalzoom.com, we put the law on your side.

everybody loves to blame speculators for the high price of gas or oil, but so many folks out there don't even know how a speculator works, and that is where lizzie o'leary comes in. lizzie went down into the oil pits of the new york mercantile nymex we call it, to show you

how the market works. >> it looks like chaos. but what these guys are shouting about will determine how much that gallon of gas you put in your car will cost. >> if they weren't shouting, i wouldn't have a job. >> this is the world of oil traders. okay, so think about it this way. every single energy product that you use, whether that's home heating oil or gas that goes in your car or crude oil that makes up that gas, even the fuel that goes into fertilizer used on a farm is traded on this exchange. ira eckstein has been doing this for 20 years. >> this is a trillion dollar game and there's billion dollar players. >> almost none of them will ever see a drop of the gooey stuff. they're trading the to buy or sell oil at a certain price in the future. it works like this. if you buy an option at $120 for next month and oil goes to $150, you make money. that's long before the barrels of oil ever make it to their final owner, like an airline or

an oil company. and right now, regulators are debating whether all this trading is pushing up the price. the big players make expensive bets. how much money do i have to have to buy a contract? >> it's a good contract. it's a 1,000 barrel contract and crude is trading, you know, at $110. $110,000 to own the contract. >> those of us who don't have that much can do it this way. do people call you and say hey, i noticed that i'm paying a lot more for gas and i see oil in the news. i want to get in on that. >> of course, of course. >> reporter: jeff goldberg makes investments for ordinary people. you want oil, you can buy a fund that goes up when it goes up and down when it goes down. >> buy low, sell high. that's the key. >> pretty simple. >> lizzie joins me now from washington. lizzie, shameless plug, first of all. if you were to buy the oil and

take delivery of it, you would take delivery of it, generally speaking, at cushing, oklahoma, and that's where i will be on monday with the cnn express. i take it you were not tempted to buy oil? >> no, look, you like to lug around your oil barrel. i didn't want to do that. no. and part of it is the price. if you want to buy a big contract, it's a lot of money. but the other thing is regular people can buy an exchange traded fund but most people don't know they probably, if they have a 401(k) or retirement fund, they probably already have oil. because maybe they have that exchange traded fund or maybe they have got some stocks that are shares of exxon or whatever, so you're paying more for gas. you're actually lining your own pocket. >> right. so in fact i wrote an article in "money" magazine about the idea that maybe you should be smart about how -- nobody says oil prices are going down in the near term so maybe you should figure out a way to line your pocket. the other side of this, though, is did you have a chance to discuss with these guys who are traders, they know how to make money on these things, the

discussion about whether the industry should be regulated and what role speculators have in the price of oil? >> this is a big question even with the guys on the nymex floor. the argument they make is this is a trillion dollar market. ira said to me, three guys sitting in an office can't move it that much. that certainly is met with a skeptical eyebrow raise here in d.c. there was, as part of that big dodd-frank law, there is a part of it that goes in that the speculators if you will can't hold more than a certain percent of a certain commodity, but that's being argued right now. so the law is written but it hasn't gone into effect and it's getting a court challenge. this could be a very long process before we even know if that has any effect on prices. >> lizzie, our specialist on aviation and regulation, so we're going to be seeing a lot of her over the course of the year. thanks, lizzie, great to see you. i'm glad you didn't have to lug a barrel of oil back to d.c. with you. lizzie, we'll see you soon. thanks very much for that. coming up, searching for

solutions to rising oil and gas prices. former energy secretary bill richardson joins us next. ♪ he was a 21st century global nomad ♪ ♪ home was an airport lounge and an ipad ♪ ♪ made sure his credit score did not go bad ♪ ♪ with a free-credit-score-dot-com ♪ ♪ app that he had ♪ downloaded it in the himalayas ♪ ♪ while meditating like a true playa ♪ ♪ now when he's surfing down in chile'a ♪ ♪ he can see when his score is in danger ♪ ♪ if you're a mobile type on the go ♪ ♪ i suggest you take a tip from my bro ♪ ♪ and download the app that lets you know ♪ ♪ at free-credit-score-dot-com now let's go. ♪ vo: offer applies with enrollment in freecreditscore.com™.

[♪...] >> i wish my patients could see what i see. that over time, having high cholesterol, plus diabetes or high blood pressure or family

history of early heart disease, can put them at increased risk for plaque buildup. and they'd see that it's more important to get their cholesterol where their doctor wants. and why for these patients, when diet and exercise alone aren't enough, i prescribe crestor. adding crestor lowers bad cholesterol by up to 52%. and is also proven to slow plaque buildup. >> announcer: crestor is not right for everyone. like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. simple blood tests will check for liver problems. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking or if you have muscle pain or weakness. that could be a sign of a rare but serious side effect. >> is your cholesterol where your doctor wants? ask your doctor if crestor is right for you. >> announcer: if you can't afford your medication, astra zeneca may be able to help.

continuing our conversation on gas and oil prices and what it may do to the economy, i'm joined by bill richardson, the former governor of new mexico and former education secretary under president clinton. christine romans joins me as well. governor, thanks for being with us. clearly, the president and this always happens when gas prices go up is under political pressure to do something about gas prices. you were the energy secretary. are there short-term options? and should we even be involved in short-term solutions when we talk about gas prices increasing? >> well, we need long-term solutions. we need to have energy diversification. for energy security. that means, i think, the key alternative fuels are natural gas and renewables. we need to move in that direction with natural gas as a bridge.

we also have to have more energy efficiency, more fuel efficiency, i think the president has pushed that. short-term, you know, maybe the strategic petroleum reserve. i wouldn't sell barrels in the clinton administration, we did. we put some barrels on the market. and that helped reduce the price a little bit. but that's short-term. other steps that we need to take obviously is work with a consumer countries, with japan with europe to get them to work on opec countries. i used to be criticized, ali, when i was energy secretary. i'd go around to the opec countries, to the saudi arabias and say the price is too high. actually at the time it was about $25. i'd say, increase production. and generally the opec countries in those days were in the mood to help us, but they're not anymore. but there are no short-term solutions. but the fact is, this president under this president, there's been an increase in domestic oil

and gas drilling. >> it's interesting, though, i will bring up, ali, you mentioned short-term, governor, and short-termism is something that's been a problem not just now but for administrations for a long, long time that one of the things that we do is we look at the near term, what's happening to gas prices, drives voters, drives sentiment. we talk about the strategic petroleum reserve and then we don't really -- we don't really accept the failures that come in the near term because, you know, we're just so concerned about the next election. do you think if we can get past this short-termism that we could actually start having a solid energy policy? >> well, christine, my hope is that when and if the president is re-elected, i think he is, the voters are sending a message they want solutions. we don't have a national energy policy because of the bipartisan bickering. and we need a comprehensive policy that says there has to be a renewable portfolio standard for every state, 20% renewable.

yes, we have to do domestic oil and gas drilling carefully in the gulf in public lands. we need to have more fuel efficiency. i think standards on automobiles is a move in the right direction. energy efficiency policies. you could create a green economy with a new policy. so what we need more than anything is for the parties to come together and pass a comprehensive energy bill. this can only be done after voters send a message. but there's no question, gas prices are high. and the president, i think is taking the right short-term steps to deal with this politically. because generally, incumbents are blamed that the prices go up at the pump. but this is what happened to us in the clinton/gore years. so you have to be politically very careful, but at the same time, try to have some long-term bipartisan solutions to diversify our energy supply. >> but you know, compared to the uk and other european countries

where taxes both at the federal level and lower than federal levels were very, very high. we don't have that situation. it's not like the government can do something. you mentioned the strategic petroleum reserve. but as you said, it generally has a short-term and relatively minimal. in fact, at some point, the psychology becomes mixed in with what should be done. >> one of my big messages is don't give up on renewables. solar, wind, biofuels, i know they're getting expensive, there's technology issues that have to be dealt with. some not in my backyard issues. but i really think for the world, for the united states, we need to move more in that direction. nuclear, i think you have to keep it on the table as an option because it doesn't emit greenhouse gas emissions. we have to resolve the waste issue, the cost issue, issues relating to safety. the public's leery about nuclear and the nuclear companies. i would recommend they do is ban where the environmentalists to

push for climate change. they barely emit any greenhouse gas emissions. but, you know, they all fight each other. and worse, the political process, republicans and democrats are just so miles apart on what should be done. but politically, they're unwilling to come up with a comprehensive bipartisan bill that i think is sorely needed. gas prices, energy are the biggest, i believe, negative entity in our international and national economy. we better resolve some of these fuel gas price energy diversity issues because it's our energy security. we don't want to be dependent on opec. we don't want to be dependent on the persian gulf, on iran shutting off the straits of hormuz. we're in a perilous situation. >> we're going to use 90 million barrels a day this year, a record. we'll use more oil this year than we've ever used. >> only because oil prices went up the way they did last time that the renewables had traction. when you endorsed the pickens

plan it was because of the high oil prices that people were saying, hey, this is viable because we invest in solar and we invest in wind and natural gas. and the problem is people have very, very short memories, christine. short-termism problem is a problem. governor richardson, always a pleasure to talk to you. thank you for being with us again. >> thank you very much. listen, next week we're not going to be in the studio. we're heading out on the road. you'll want to pay attention to where we're going. i love that my daughter's part fish. but when she got asthma, all i could do was worry ! specialists, lots of doctors, lots of advice... and my hands were full. i couldn't sort through it all. with unitedhealthcare, it's different. we have access to great specialists, and our pediatrician gets all the information.

everyone works as a team. and i only need to talk to one person about her care. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare. are you still sleeping? just wanted to check and make sure that we were on schedule. the first technology of its kind... mom and dad, i have great news. is now providing answers families need. siemens. answers.

next week, a big one on cnn as i'll be jumping on the cnn election express as we count down to super tuesday. we start in oklahoma. after tuesday's drama unfolds, we'll head south making several stops along the way to austin. that's where we'll land for full coverage of south by southwest. the biggest digital and interactive conference in the world. we'll have lots of special treats in store for you next week as "your money" will be live from the cnn grill at 1:00 p.m. eastern on saturday. and we hope you'll join us for that. thanks for joining the conversation this week on "your money," stay connected to us 24/7 on twitter. @alivelshi, i watch and read every one of your tweets. the h