tv After Words CSPAN December 28, 2016 11:16pm-12:19am EST
11:16 pm
safely it seems that the law to ask and it goes back to what my father said to me. you are no better than anyone else and no one is better than you are. [applause] i've spent more time thinking about fat van any other thing she said because this is one of those things that seems very simple and it's one of the most profound things. this gives us the confidence to walk into a situation with people who may be different than we are and to feel confident we can hold our heads high.
11:17 pm
she felt it was her prerogative as a lack of women in the segregated south and this environment to extend herself to all of the people she works. with. the white male engineers. she had such a transcendent and humanity, and a true equality of meeting people as equals, regardless of who they were. there are so many times in this situation i think what would catherine johnson's father say about them, how would i employ this view are better than no one else and no one is better than you because it seems very simple, and she says a that as f it were very simple.
11:18 pm
that is one of the things i feel like i've learned a lot in this research. >> one more question. >> will you have another time to sign books blacks >> i will be back in november if marvel can ever see. [applause] >> that will be another opportunity, it might be -- i will talk with the museum and, you know, we will kind of work out the logistics, so that we can get as many books assigned as possible. so, i think that is it and i thank everyone for coming.
11:19 pm
[applause] >> deathless margot talking about her book. tonight on the tv c-span2, we are talking about some of publishers weekly's best books of 2016. up next, we have gary young and his book another day in the death of america. >> host: i am really excited as you can see. [laughter] i'm really excited to talk with you so i'm going to ask you the question.
11:20 pm
then in the u.s. ten years when you wrote this. you could have written so many different books. why this one? >> guest: i had done this as an exercise for the guardian magazine, the paper i worke worr in 2007. when i did that at the time, i thought this could be a book. i was tasked with finding the children on that day in 2007 and i was blown away by so many of the stories many of which didn't make the news and i thought this could be the book. so when i got the opportunity a few years later, then i did. it's one of those things foreign people don't understand about the culture.
11:21 pm
i'm not sure that i ever fully understood it. and yet by the time i finished the book, i had been in the country and had to american children, my wife is american. for a long time, i assumed i was going to be here. i have skin in the game. >> host: i have lived abroad also and i end up getting questions about all kinds of things that are uniquely american. succumbing to the project, what was your sense of the american culture? >> guest: i think i had not quite understood. i had assumed the mass shootings, which are the things that get the most attention that that is how most younger people died.
11:22 pm
and i didn't really give them enough thought to the aggregate number around the country who would be killed in this way was with accidental shootings and the toddler that finds a gun behind a pillow while his dad is asleep the feature that you see in the news every two or three days just before the weather and meanwhile, this is going on all the time so it forces the kind of readjustment of your
11:23 pm
understanding of where you are. >> i find it interesting that in your answer you said you were endeavored to create context because we have a lot of reports on crime and the fbi, the cia. everybody but the numbers everywhere. but what i saw you doing was trying to figure out what is it about these, so can you talk about the context that you found? >> guest: with each one, what they tried to do, there is the fact i wasn't trying to litiga litigate, it wasn't forensics. in aland all of these cases thes
11:24 pm
a context that everywhere there was a context, so what else is going on. who else can i talk to. so to get a new one. they thought that it was drug related and that he had a red hoodie and pans. cover you look where he was shot dead in the housing projects where he lives, where his mother lefleft that's where he was shot dead. then where his father lived, this is where he grew up in next-door is a factory that had been closed down.
11:25 pm
11:26 pm
but just to describe. >> host: one of the things about the inner cities, you found similar circumstances in suburbia. >> guest: there's only one who was killed in a brutal area, but then there's a couple killed in very small towns and yes, basically nobody is immune to this. there is the sense that people should be. there is a very general sense
11:27 pm
where that's where things like this happen and for a young person shot dead in those areas, you can't challenge the understanding of the way the government works. you speak to the journalist and say it's not so surprising that someone would get shot in that t area, so it becomes not news, but that phrase when a dog bites a man, that isn't news. if the man bites dog that's news. but after the way of people are being shot in the area and so then they ask why do they keep writing the same people and where are these dogs. as onso one of the reports saysu become desensitized to it. the people that live in the area become desensitized because there are children that are at risk.
11:28 pm
>> host: i'm going to read a little bit from this chapter because this caught my eye. you said the indifference is less a byproduct within the unconscious mission or from the deathedead weight of power and privilege. that is a pretty big finger that you are pointing. >> guest: it is. i am talking mostly about the media. if you are talking about the media that is overwhelmingly white and not likely to live in areas like this, then it's not that you think i don't care about these people, but you just think you don't know anybody
11:29 pm
that's been shot. this isn't happening to you. it's not happening in your neighborhood. it's happening over there. and so tha the dead weight of privilege and the university education. it leaves you thinking this is something that happens to people like that and after a while, the people like that is in the way that some see they are a different species. but in the chapter, one of the first comments after his death is a woman samuel was walking
11:30 pm
11:31 pm
>> >> there must be a reason. >> that brings me to one of of things that to challenge the notion that of course, we expect them to happen to people in other places. that is one of the themes that comes out is the fact that we do need to talk about the violence that goes on star really thought was captured that this should
11:32 pm
not happen to people like this and then you say not because of sandy hook that was children that that began to transform people but does that have a significant bearing of gun violence to better align themselves with the gun-control movement and i understand that can you explain that? >> yes. when the oldest people to be shot that day when we before christmas four or five months later the gun-control movement comes for eagan safety.
11:33 pm
and i'm trying to find full sitting there was a press conference about gun-control one quarter of minneapolis is black and the victims are black there is nobody there from indianapolis. canadian lady from a very wealthy suburb she talked about mama's bears protecting her babies but they were protecting them that i think that again control movement has a sense of urgency and relevance. it is those that our most likely to be affected in
11:34 pm
that latino community and also where african-americans and latinos are more likely to be criminalize so the fact that somebody has a criminal record is a neutral indicator or statistic but if you're only looking for innocents or basie will not find them in those communities so what you have to move from a narrative that this should not happen to kids. period. and have an understanding of why some kids end up where
11:35 pm
they do. with lack of infrastructure and plaque of daycare but that is accounts people ought to dehumanize them. one but that has already been accounted for. but there was the real problem which easter to say he was in a student then you suggested there is a grade. somebody 20 tydeus today after the shooting of the olympics and sprinter said she was out 3:00 in the morning how much of a victim mushy?
11:36 pm
so what time of the day teasing is the appropriate for a girl to be shot dead? what is the curfew after which these areas become one shooting galleries and they are guilty tennis month negative. >> host: bed is a great segued that in there is thought we should declare the end violence a national health crisis to go steady it to come back with tangible daybed actionable items. can you talking about the confluence that leads to bad epidemic.
11:37 pm
11:38 pm
11:39 pm
have. >> my response to that for those people don't want to do that there is some other meaningful way i will not argue with you about the second amendment but these kids. i do want the kids running the risk and it is unacceptable. so what do you want to do? >> use say is your book with the gun lobby needs up better story. that this is my second amendment rights.
11:40 pm
11:41 pm
people that own a gun usually shoot themselves after that to your more likely to be killed by somebody that you know. are you married? watch out for your wife. she may kill you. [laughter] so they have that narrative that is indebted many ways which we can talk about that but again control people have a bigger problem be coz day talk about background checks even if they are abiding by the second amendment and this is well
11:42 pm
regulated background checks are popular. but that does not pat pat up. because american pest to imagines so differently as a more compassionate collective country. and i do think one way to say m. modern country with a medieval problem. this does not have been anywhere else. that might be a powerful message. i used to think that to one to take seriously as a collective endeavor they
11:43 pm
need space sorry decent education one woman on the south side of chicago was a physician. she said but the parents put them in a cocoon they drive them everywhere. when they drive them to school they drive them home first of all, if you have the resources to do that you don't probably lived in that area. and then in order to keep
11:44 pm
11:45 pm
11:46 pm
not that the rest of america isn't important but let's just imagine america without these places. but that libby imaginary. -- would be imaginary. so then you find geography could be misleading. so let's talk about the mapping of this book. and the 1,000 choices we have to make. have does that play into it?
11:47 pm
11:48 pm
11:49 pm
11:50 pm
11:51 pm
11:52 pm
11:53 pm
11:54 pm
11:55 pm
11:56 pm
11:57 pm
11:58 pm
11:59 pm
12:00 am
12:01 am
12:02 am
12:03 am
12:04 am
12:05 am
12:06 am
12:07 am
12:08 am
12:09 am
12:10 am
12:11 am
12:12 am
12:13 am
12:14 am
12:15 am
12:16 am
12:17 am
12:18 am
51 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
CSPAN2 Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on