has the ability to move has eye gaze but all of the other muscles can't be moved but can they communicate and so now we have in windows ten, in fact, in the fall creators update, eye gaze is is input mechanism so i feel one of the things that the unlock is is the fundamental recognition that it's not just about accessibility as ap technology, in fact, many hicksically in microsoft think of it as wow, this is something that you do as assistive technology. and as a nearby as something that you do on top of having built the product. but the reality is, that one thing that is truly all for all of us is at some point in our life, we all really need something with some sense of ours. and with the universal truth that we can help everybody and that's what i think we're trying

to involve in the beauty it is that it is not some top down thing quite frankly it is much more if you look at our hack-a-thon but they don't end with just that one week we do but it takes life after that. we're passionate. and we have a long distance to cover. but what that can mean for accessibility and mixed reality can mean for accessibility and frontier and make it a better company and device for the company and better everything company for the area.prrams joi- booktv.org. beginning now final program of the day live from the texas book festival author and software engineer describing changes in

technology. this is booktv on c-span 2. hi everyone sorry to interrupt. welcome to the 25th annual texas book festival. thanks for coming out for authors, the festival and great writing, and literacy. after the session here, ellen will sign books in the tent down the way. the books are for sale here courtesy of book people our great, local independent book seller and i encourage you to support local book sellers. the texas book festival is a nonprofit organization and its mission is to support low income schools and texas with author visits easer book donations via

reading rock stars program and to fund immigrants for libraries nb texas so your purchases make a huge difference in the lives of texas kids. so please buy early and often. this texas book festival is also running book drive this weekend to raise money help to rebuild texas libraries affected by hurricane harvey so if you don't $15 at any register to buy a book for reading rock star, student -- the texas book festival and talker foundation will each match your donation with a book to rebuild a library affected by the hurricane. so one book purchase puts three tbhoox a library. so please keep that in mind. all right so it is my very great pleasure to be here with elleen she is i'm just going to read a little of her bio. she wrote a first computer program in 1978 went on to have a 20-year career as a

programmerrer in soft square engineer. her essay and books should become essential reading in describing the social o and emotional and political effects and personal effects of technology in our lives. she's the author of two novels by blood. and blood and first book was a "new york times" note public book. her book we're talking about today is close to machine it's a personal -- short -- that was a previous memoir. [laughter] forgive me. no what we're talking about here is life in code. a personal history of technology. and it's ellen and i go way back. i edited her at harpersing magazine when i was an editor there, and she was writing about technology i was the -- i was the editor the one of the oldest magazines in the country a story publication and now kind

of switch roles now i'm an internet editor for the intercept and she's -- she's a novelist. and distinguished memoirs so it's interesting how our careers have intertwined and crossed and so that was a wonderful experience for me. you were my editor there's a piece in the book called programming the post human, and it's a long piece in which i talk about can we make a robot and make conscienceness in another silicon and metal that's a complicated question and i think i gave you roger, like 20,000 words. [laughter] and that's very long. for a magazine -- and you were brilliant in tracking that down, so i give you all kinds of foot notes to get you source and you were happy about that and a wonderful

collaboration and i want to give you the credit i spoke about the other day. there was one moment in there where i was talking about how this simulation was meant to represent what human beings really were -- the image of man and i had that in italics and roger did the editor thing where he said ellen you don't need ioal picks trust your writing. that is how they get away with. >> and writing was so strong i hope you pick up the book and it covers the whole, the whole sweep of her career and really life, and so i thought we would start off with a simple question which is the beginning . what was it ellen tell us about what -- what got you interested in computers and programming and technology in general? >> i'll try to be brief. it started when i was just finishing college at cornell and

there was a group called video project and this was a time when the first personal video recorders was available for the effect and it was a great excitement in the air because at that pont the corporations controlled what new what was beamed into television. and what could be made on video. suddenly you could do it yourself. and this sounds like coming of the cc it is very much has that forever in the sense that we can change the world. and over course of it i found i really like working with machines i like doing the recording. i like doing edit th and generator it felt cool to be walking around with cables other my shoulder and former english major calling on the floor plugging in video in out, in out it sounds fantastic if fun. and if then after later hanging in college town is not good for

the soul. i was in san francisco walking down market street one day in the window of the radio shack store radio shack departed last place you can find a job -- there was a trsa meeting an early microcomputer. and known as the trash and completely on impulse i bought it. and i thought well maybe this is like i was telling you could make stuff with it. can you make art and do social activism, and well it turns out to involve computer programming. [laughter] so how for pa can that be? it turned out to be hard. there's a lot of hair pulling involved and cursing and -- kind of what you see about program percent staying up all night all day in their pajamas forgetting to eat. and then at some point i began to figure it out.

i'll bring you briefly my honest was about mcbeth and if you really know the play is about complication of what's the future what's already happened trying to pun wind what comes first and second is kind of not trivial. well the same thing was true with basic code because you could get all squirreled up in it. it was calling spaghetti code i said if yand unkind time i can figure out this -- and my first computer program was -- image where graphic of a bouncing ball and how it locked as it bounced down and at that time it was primitive and it shows pits curve and i got it working i sat back and i went oh -- god it works. and i found it was a tremendous pleasure and i said wow, this is great. i went on to take a jobs a programmer.

and that was buzz i needed money. and pouked that even though it was work i found oifs fascinated by getting thought at work you think something you draw it out, and then somehow it stopped beig mental and turned into physical operating thing and that changes states fascinated me. >> so when you started work, you entered a world that was overwhelmingly male. and this comes up again and again throughout the book this culture, this male dominated programming culture were you conscience of yourself as a pioneer or o were you more like a spy? [laughter] a spy from the world of grownups into this -- world of boy men and perpetual

adolescence. >> wasn't like that to begin with the first company at the time when business -- computing was exploding and you know there weren't a lot of computer programs around so anyone who touched a machine and got a program working got a job so a lot of people i worked with were explorers like me with weird backgrounds in classics former dancer, and they were fun to work with and -- as time went by, there were more -- those who would come through engineering schools. and they had degrees. and then the tenner of things changed i encountered a lot of uncommunicative men. men who also made it very heart disease for me because i was not aloud to make mistakes. computer programming is an exercise in failure. to write code is to write bugs and remove them one by one and

by one so all about failure and how you deal request it. but i wasn't allowed to make mistake. i was humiliated sometimes and very coyly. well you left that day and you know i couldn't get my this and that working, and so you know -- maybe you don't like this job. and sometimesout -- outright and i i had this one instance i had to go fix a client's system and they lived way out -- in the mojave practically and i was fixing this guy's system and he had greasy hair and ear lobes and -- he wore this horrible polyester shirt and he sat there rubbing my back the whole time i worked. i thought this guy is going to snap my bra what is he 11 -- and i changed chairs and he would never stop and he would never stop. and i thought what do i do?

what do i do? and this was something i talked with women what do you do in this situation is this -- now at the time i was wrath rather new at all of this and work that was most physical you know he was getting touching me and more and more intimate places. and -- you know i just changed chairs and i started standing up which made it hard for him. and at some point pight i'm going to just blow up his system and put a bomb in this thing and it is going to look like it is working with now and i'm going to leave and whole thing had will blow up. [laughter] and i didn't do it because i wanted to go back from this shift and say i fixed this system. and then i kind of faced him down. i didn't want to get in trouble with my career.

now that is -- i don't know if that was the right answer. back then i thought it was. now i wonder -- you know, what that meant to me if i would have blown him up -- maybe that was the right thing to do. and i think this is exactly what women hope with now. what is the right thing to do? how much do you protest. how much do you just say go away. you know is just think on your mind this guy is a jerk? when someone is really, you know, goes beyond that, and goes into criminal behavior this is a different thing. >> yeah. >> after talking to someone who interviewed me and i was very surprised to find myself saying well they're kind of levels of this. one is like -- you're just, you know -- you're a jerk. and then it's just -- well they're boys and it was just tell yourself you're smarter than they are no matter what they think and when it goes

into the criminal behavior that is -- that is where it all crosses the line right now, and that's the explosion we're seeing and in all professions -- i'm excited about this. >> so you also talk about how this engineering culture becomes caughtified and goes to a very important scene well i don't to get ahead of myself but there's a sense in which there's -- where code becomes created and takes on a life of its own and that the culture of the coders becomes kind of sedimentary level in the code, and then the culture at the larger culture then has to conform to the kind of code that is being laid down almost like a constitution.

and you write you were present and i was present when we when the web first began to arrive. and in the mid-90s you had been on the scene for a long time you had come out of the command line culture thed hard core of computing and then we saw these or already seen the rise of the graphic user interface with the mac and early windows program but suddenly there's this whole new system -- this world wide web began to appear and you were suspicious from the beginning. what was it that ticked you off because now we're going to see some of the fruits of the decisions that were made early on. fruit, >> perhaps liz of the verge called it ugly blossom which i think is more

appropriate. that's a wig big question my first us suspicion is mostly men thinking to create a golden future and -- out of it will come a new supreme being starter than we are, and we should shrine at this and golden future now right away -- that's enough to make you suspicious. then i saw this when the idea was go to this website. don't use these brokers, these agents, these teachers these curators, these journalists mainstream media, and come to pus because they're just out there are themselves they're not so smart. and they're fools you're and taking your money with people a lot of expertise now granted you paid them but men suddenly i'm

going to take a travel agent everyone thinks it is so great you get -- now you could call a travel agent and say i want to go here and here and there, and they could even find you an upgrade because they have a -- a b line you know a hotline to the airline. or you can spend hour it is online looking for this cheeps cheapest fare so it created endless fulfillment and once you enter into that world, it seemsu enter fantasy of utter happiness. whatever you desire will be out there just keep looking. this whatted to me i needed a new facet. and normally i would have gone into a plumbing supplier hired somebody maybe one day or two but then i got on the web and you know how many websites are

that sell facets? turns out to be like 100. and i spent days, weeks sitting there -- looking at facets i near knew the universe of single hole, single-handed facets could be so huge. and i began it was a kind of -- what i saw the web doing to you. if grabbed me into this terrible unhappiness. that suddenly i realized these things were repeating there wasn't endless but torturing myself with my illusion that my desire perfect own desire was out there to be fulfilled so went to a plumbing supply store fixeded mine had a plumber install it one day, done. so have i -- >> i think that -- >> does that pretty well cover it? >> that does. now there's a crucial chapter in the book --

where you go to a conference and it's a computer freedom and privacy conference. and it gets to what i think is libertarian paradox of the webs architecture the original internet versus what we're experiencing it now. so tell us a little bit about that. there were some very big personalities there who had kind of a conversion experience that i think gets to the heart of the predicament that we're facing now with the corporatization of the internet. >> well there was a dream that the internet would be this free and open discussion on -- some friends here who remember this. who involve in early days this -- this feeling of trust and discussion among equals and a sense of decorum and there was a lot of kind of ugly become and

forth but people in general had had the impulse to kind of quiet those things down and to step in. and it kind of natural way. and then corporate company -- companies began to say well there are a lot of these people there how can i have eye balls on screen? and of course you all know now we can zoom forward 25 years to where -- everything you see has an ad on it you're being tracked i don't have to tell you about this. but in the year of 2000, tim byrneer lee credited with creating a hyperlinking and the web itself suddenly -- saying you know what, there are libertarians and they're supposed to be against goth not business and some are going well -- corporations are taking over the web i'm not for regulation but --

...and this was hair and i knew there would be regulation of government was the devil, and so even those who were -- who have this dream or gipping to see that it was poisoned. and did not know how to turn, and regulation did not happen. they were naturally against it. so you can see where we are today. it was a turning point. i -- with diffy important algorithm was there and suddenly he's up there -- libertarian math matism proclaiming socialism just oh, boy. supreme really changed their minds about what's happening and both happy -- and i don't know.

worried. i know -- i thought these conversions came too late. >> you express it very well is the -- as the -- it's really a question of law is code or how did you put itsome it was -- the rule of law versus rule of code. and rule of code was not necessarily as you put it necessarily a democratic or even a pleasant regime that we're entering into, and what i was struck about was how profectic that conference was because, you know, now we're getting to the point where the entire internet is controlled by four, five massive corporations. and we're beginning really to see the -- the political effects of that. now, we work together it on programming the post human which

was i think a very profound essay about artificial intelligence in some of the cybernetics and some of the fundamental as you see them and i tend to agree very much errors that are going into the design of these systems. what had is it about -- about this approach to technology that you find so maddening or dangerous? >> this approach -- [laughter] which -- this, artificial intenls of -- the dream of artificial intenls. >> when we work on programming the post human pfts idea was to attempt to create robots who had self-awareness and ability to function the way human beings did. that they were -- not only simulation of what we

were, they were what we were. in the abstract. they defined us at first called brain was a computer. then brain was seen as a angt colony and create e lab rat structure nobody is telling them from what to do on high. small little interactions, that was the belief that that is how we functioned. but over and over kept coming across saying rodney brooks a well known robot cyst at the time called his group called the c word and he meant conscienceness, and you know he asked me what is conscienceness for? and do you know what conscienceness is i sat down and told him. well, you know, we're born helpless and we have to know who's friends who is foe. it's deep in us someone looking at you you look back you're

aware of someone staring at you look at a dog sometimes boom this is a response to vital response. so when the course of that you have to identify individuals. you have to form social groups. they are cooperating, families, clans, tribes -- and out of the recognition that others exist, as individual -- one person different from another you understand that you too exist. it is called theory of mind. if i have these thoughts well that person has these thoughts. and this is survival mode and rodney brooks out there he went we can't even get robots to recognize their own kind. [laughter] so i think thing that really scarce me now is workers in artificial intelligence have given up a whole process of trying to create a robotic human that's no longer interesting to

them him. do you remember the film her? where excuse me the name -- anyway, why? she you know she wants to be human like in star trek how to become a human being and at some point she and other oss they're called they're having fun being computers. and they can have interactions that stillon interactions in seconds. and they get bored with the human beings and go off being happy as computers. and this is kind of what's happening now. i'll give you example of self-driving cars human beings have 100 years or of so experience driving vehicles. and none of that see interesting now to people doing these. they're doing, you know, proximity these kind of mathematical things -- relationship between algorithms.

i'm over here in the car, and you know they have this way they interact and oh, there's the interpret internet and whole web of interactions, electronically. and i'll go into why okay the technological problems in that will take me all afternoon and i will save you from that. but the issue is when you're a driver there's a first crash that happened with a google car was a four-way stop. so you know there are rules if two cars come at the same time. does anyone remember the rule? it's a drive on the right. but most people don't know it and they don't do it. the way human beings actually work out who goes first is kind of flick hadder of the eye. and you read the car -- if the car is coming too fast you can see it's just going to o touch brakes oh, okay someone who doesn't look at you or head down you let go -- it's a social reaction and what

we are as social creatures so google car follows the rules. okay i'm the car on the right i get to go first. [laughter] boom. they have their first crash. oh, this is -- what we can do is proximity no you drive okay people let's take a good human drivers and losses you look far ahead you get a sense that you're going to have to stop way before the person in front of you is. you can read the human driver. you see a car moving in a certain way. the make of the car, the speed of the car, and you know that person is going to cut in front of you. there are personalities and driving is a social experience. and so you tend to completely do away with this and replace it only with technology and algorithms is the big switch right now. human behavior is not ho considered an interesting molds. for artificial intenls,

intelligence that to me is a startling change, and it's a profound. ... looking forward and looking at, thinking about your critique of the early web and your long experience with computer

technology and what you just articulated about the new frontier, do you see any rays of hope? do you see things like the rise of signal and tour and these? tell us about that. >> tour is a means to cryptography to communicate anonymously and the web do not have security and privacy built into it. it was billed as a collegial system for people to exchange ideas. by the department of defense so anyone who makes a system knows that the key module being added 15 years later is never going to work. tour is one of those systems so what's been happening is this cryptography system, not the cryptography itself although

there are flaws in some of them that have been exploited, the installation. they are being hacked one after another. people respond to phishing expeditions. operating systems are not a dated. basically if it's on the web that can be hacked. someone was doing a self-driving car and i got hacked and they at least pulled it over so do i see hope? i see hope -- "the news york times" sunday section had an article technology is not your friend. you are just finding this out now. [laughter] hello. where have you been? so you know at least it's out there. now look there's a whole generation that barely remembers

life before the internet and one that has never experienced life before the internet and so when you say technology is not your friend this is a new concept to them and when i meet young people they say what should i do? i could talk about the obstacles and facebook is an algorithm and i could talk about that for a long time. i don't think we have time for that. i would just encourage them to look at the past of computing. look back and see how these things happen. what's happening now is recent but it's not new. it has roots in the past and learning how we came to this juncture may lead us into how to get out of it. >> isn't also a matter of arming oneself with understanding so that is not so much of a black locks so that it's not, i mean

the problem is people think of these machines as magical and they have no real understanding of the decision-making that goes into it. there's this wonderful point in the book where you say, it was a question you were discussing with a tech to write change where the technology is the driver of change which you disagree with strongly and you have this line which know it's not machines that are making the decisions and it's not even the coders who are making these decisions often. its managers who are making these decisions. >> venture capitalists, ceos. there are natural desires. we want to find friends. these are all perfectly wonderful human desires but they are shunted, they are essentially purchased and avenues that take your money. i talked about facebook. what could facebook have done about the election?

how did they not catch all of this and why didn't they hire 10,000 more people to look at postings? facebook, google and apple and facebook in particular is one big set of algorithms. they are algorithms that were written by algorithms that were written by algorithms something called machine learning. they take the outcome that notched quite sure how it got there so there are billions of people doing billions upon billions of of posts. human curators can't keep up with this and this is what troubles me. does them matter how many people you hire, human beings versus grinding algorithms are going to lose. this is what keeps me up at night. so do i have any good news? i'm not famous for that i believe. i could say i look forward to the millennial generation those

who are new because i really do think they see the problem and they are sensitive to what is wrong and they know code is not visible. many of them have learned how to code. they are not taking these bios too hard and i trust them. i decided i'm going to trust them and i wish their future well. >> that's a good note to turn it over to the audience on. please if you have questions come up to the microphone and please ask a question as opposed to a statement. thank you. >> how do you stay scared when colors flash on your eyelids when fluoride hits your brain and you can say it does not stop you as far as what you just said said. >> i don't understand your

question. can you repeat it? >> you stay scared by the algorithm, right? that will conquers human beings. >> it will be about the brain. >> would injects into her cells that is on line? our brain is hardly learning to combat that. how do you then stay pessimistic as a millennial? >> i don't think the brain is a separate thing from a person. the brain is a kind of, it's the top of it. everything that happened starts from the body. knowledge starts with the body. even mathematics. you can't just cut off your head and have a brain so we have a physical reaction to life. our thoughts are not like algorithms and so i think we are

in a different playing here. >> thank you. next. >> hi i have more than half of my programming career ahead of me and you have seen many frontiers of things happening over your career and i'm wondering what you are thinking of the exciting new challenges. what are the exciting new challenges that you think are coming up? >> what do you think they are? it's really up to you. i'm just throwing this back to you. i'm curious as to what you think think. i'm gloomy by nature. >> well, what i think is interesting and what i think is possible seemed to be diverging at the moment. i think it would be interesting to see out the technology and algorithms and the real social justice issues and all the cartels and the scale of which

they operate and how much of that is dark web and corruption? there a lot of interesting things in the open data. >> a bronx councilman in new york has it danced the bill and i'm not sure if it has passed yet, it may have passed mandating that all the algorithms used to make decisions in the bronx and this includes garbage pickup which schools kids go to police assignments be examined. this is where we need to go. when we are up against facebook its proprietary but this to me is the social direction to understand there are decisions being made and we can examine them and change them. it has an agency over the code. >> if i could just add coding tools that will aid in transparency and accountability is i think one of the great frontiers right now.

i happen to know several tour developers and people who are active in creating those tools and i think there's a lot of work to be done. >> could you share your thoughts about how bitcoin and diphtheria are going to attack us in the future? >> cryptocurrency. briefly for the audience that's an algorithms are used in place of money and they are not controlled by any government. they are issued by individuals and they are backed by algorithms of people willing to believe they are worth something. i'm going to give a shout-out to my friend stuart haber who had the first patent on block chaining. block chaining is a mathematical concept to figure out what happens in what order which is very important for buying and

selling. now it's a libertarian currency and it's not controlled so the libertarians got exactly what they wanted. you can buy something that's worth $2000 and a few days later can be worth $300 and it rides up and down. there are competing cryptocurrency's now. i have friends who -- i'm tempted to do it by $100 worth of coins and see what happens. what will happen, i think it's exciting and scary at the same time which all these things are. i worry however that the issuers of these coins will control these in a way that's more powerful than the federal reserve.

because it's not transparent. >> watch mr. robot for one view of that. >> thank you for coming. how can we encourage the millennials to preserve the culture of paper and voice and face to face and jotting notes, all those things that have that more high touch kind of quality? >> one person at a time. i mean on the one hand i know those things have to go way. greek drama was wonderful. it was a wonderful communal experience and i love greek drama but it's no longer, it became no longer a means for the community coming together over time. it was replaced by other things.

now will these little notebook things that you can write on your pads replaced it? there is something tactile about paper and there are studies that children who read actual books learn better and faster and more deeply than those who read it on the screen. they are those who must preserve the culture of the past but accepting it will be a smaller and smaller number of people and that is a hard transition to make. you like dry casks television. you will like it for a while but when you are young you will look back and it will be like the old furby. there are some trends that are on their way to not be turned back. there are people who love all television and there are stations that you can watch so there are places that preserve

these. there's this ongoing effort to preserve webpages before they disappear. so it's good news and bad news. there'll always be people who appreciate the value of the older thing but we cannot expect to pass on that same appreciation in the same way. it will be an older thing and trying to understand is that older thing still useful? >> it's also true if you look around there are plenty of young people at this conference and i don't think the prospect of literacy is as gloomy as some people think it is and this book festival is one of the best ways that we can keep book learning alive. just your presence here is a big part of it. >> thank you roger. >> we have time for one more question. >> hi commisso was a young woman

in tech i recently got an e-mail with the subject line diversity higher ed. some great tech companies are now realizing the lack and diversity however i want to be recognized for the fact that i have those skills. >> there was a noise out there. >> that i can program and i'm good at what i do and not getting enough or because i am a woman and this is diversity. so i was just curious on your thought on diversity hires in the tech world. >> my experience is whenever there is a conference within a company to welcome in outsiders and i mean women and minorities people of other colors. especially with women there is a fierce back lash. it's almost atavistic. they are these young men and

they are young to have this culture and they want to sleep under their desk all night and then they'll want the women around. they want to go home. so it's going to be a battle. what i believe is that tack into the love of the work you have and really hold that and many have looked prejudice in the eyes before. just stare back and refuse to be sent away. and you can think that person is a jerk but if that person has power over you that's a different matter. i hate to throw this back on the individual but to a certain extent i matter how the did you are you have to go in there and face prejudice. there needs to be the equipment to tell yourself i love this work, i am good at it. just hold onto that and many men

helps me learn technology. i know this doesn't up pose your answer. >> no, thank you. >> thank you all for coming. thank you for joining us. ellen will be signing books at the book signing tent and again please dig deep and buy books to help the texas book festival continue its work. thank you. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations]

[inaudible conversations] westco that wraps up today's life coverage from the texas book festival in austin. live coverage continues tomorrow at 3:00 p.m. eastern time directly following are live in depth program with michael lewis. now he missed any of today's programs the entire day re-airs starting at 9:00 p.m. eastern time tonight.

with almost all the books have in common is interesting characters to meet in the same situations. so the trick is if you can attach the raider to the character at the beginning of the book they will follow that character anywhere. trust me there is no one but want to read my description of collateralized debt obligations but once you realize you let them know. it's a very powerful body that is the origins of literature.

>> they are covering this up and hundreds maybe thousands thousands of companies across this country and across the world. so the big question that you ask is why? what i found out from the research in my book is that it's not always the most powerful person at the company that we protect and sometimes we protect our low level employees from harassment. i will give an example, somebody comes to an job and they are warned, be careful of joe over there. he has been there for 30 years and he is a weird sense of humor. sure enough the woman finds out who joe really is and she goes to complain and who do they protect? joe. it's not a central person to the functioning of the company.

he's not the ceo of the company but they protect joe and that woman is out. at every level i have to tell you that i feel relieved by the harvey weinstein story. >> you should, absolutely. not just you, we all do. i was horrified but i was also thrilled that this came out that he was outed that he got fired from this company that they are going to take his name off the company, that he is going into therapy and thrilled that his wife was leaving him. i think that he should be shunned and i think this is a huge step forward for all of us who have had these experiences and we all have. >> it's a step forward for enablers and the people that you mentioned who will also be called out and you know what they are going to feel the shame that all of those women have

felt when they shouldn't have. enablers are a huge part of this problem and a huge part of this solution. actually sexual harassment training and companies is focused more on enablers than almost anything else. we should focus on how to get the courage to the enabler to not be the enabler and to also come forward? it's crucial.

>> tribes have what is known as sovereignty. they have the authority from their pre-constitutional existence and self-governing and that's the position that tried to take. there is sovereignty within their territory. >> if he were caught stealing a horse for example if you were to get away from any settlement they would hang you so that happen quite frequently. that was what you call the frontier justice for rough justice. >> the fort at sioux falls was called for dakota was really one of many forts established throughout the region and it was really i think established to provide a glimpse of safety and

security for those settlers here here. >> we are on one of the main thorough fairs of sioux falls, south dakota, phillips avenue named for one of the first settlers of the decoded territory josiah phillips. >> i can see after isis exists i can see bin laden to be the new leader. he is young and he's millennial. he was trained for the last

seven or eight years as a top commander people who do not have access to the council. he gets married to the number two person in al qaeda's daughter mohammad al asiri and that happened against us and masterminded the bombings himself. so i think he is going to be the person and he already has about five different messages. at the very beginning they always called him brother bin laden. the last message the announcement and the message both refer to him as shake which indicates a promotion. he cannot be in al qaeda without having tribal ship. if you listen to the statement have been listening to all of

his statements you see something interesting. he had never a tax isis. he never mentions the caliphate. he actually says what's happening in iran and syria and libya and what's happening in mali and everywhere all these guys are the mujahideen and they are the followers of bin laden. he says look his people in the west now we are everywhere and his tone, he tried to copy his father. he tried to copy his father. his tone is exactly the tone of goes -- bin laden. the same statement sometimes. and the one before last where he gave his commandments for

operatives in the west. he said look tried to kill as many people as you can. don't just take a knife. it's hard to do. and then he said and always leave a message why you did it. i'm telling you why he did it. so i'm telling you what to say. number one hour lands are occupied. the land of the two places meaning saudi arabia is occupied occupied. we did not hear that since osama bin laden died. we did not hear that in iraq. if we don't live in peace in palestine you would never know peace in america. that's something bin laden said himself but also we did not see it and how long?

a long, long time ago and the new talk of a stealing the wealth of the muslim world. we did not hear that for a long time. he only adds one thing that we did not hear his father talked about what's happening in syria. the murders of the assad regime which he said we are doing attacks in the west because you are supporting them. that's the only thing he added and frankly he cannot, not mention syria one of the largest in al qaeda but he is bringing back the original message of osama bin laden. i talk about his character and i talk about his childhood. in the early days if you look at the old videotapes of al qaeda his fiery speeches when he was a kid. he is talking to the mujahideen and teased told his father,

father when i was in jail i learned a lot and you were going to be proud of me. i've learned about is my learned about that but now i am ready to watch the mujahideen under your commandment. bin laden for all of his sons and he wanted only two people to come and join him, his wife who has a ph.d., older than him and she has only one son, hamza and his wife wasn't just a wife. she was his adviser. she was his wordsmith. she was his concierge literally. he wanted her to come not because he missed his wife comes he said if you don't bring her here i will myself bring her here.

this guy lost his mind, what do you mean? he wanted her to basically work on the anniversary of 9/11. he wanted her to tell him what to say. and when they could not bring her to him he actually you know was convinced finally and he said in a letter the anniversary is coming and you know how important this is so i told his chief of staff to buy a computer and please stop working on the statements for the tenth anniversary of 9/11. she is pushed more and more towards following in his footsteps. she is like the woman behind the father and the son. so today we see al qaeda trying to wait until isis -- and a new

bin laden will come and claim that message, claim ownership for that message. and i think they will be successful with that. in a clear at the center for western study on the campus of august and the university which is an sioux falls, south dakota. an institution of higher learning that's been in south dakota for over 100 years. my n