in thailand. [inaudible] explaining the proposal to reform. and this was acquisition was very powerful. so okay this thing it would not help again in foreign government. it's the other tactic basically is the political party coming together. you have an alliance it's too much to be of importance again. i cannot think of anything except we have strategy.

they don't believe the action anyway. would be useful not only to isolate the party but there it would be a better chance to get powers. when not be able to inform the a government anyway. quite surprised could be no other political party would become specific or to actively see the interest will not touch again without the help of the party in the atmosphere of fear.

members of the mover party. thanks again so the mover party has gone. i was told that party that was at one time to have to amend it.

so you see the set up what has been a threat to approach them. i do not know. but has not ended yet. we do not know what can happen to the new party. just a note for something quite interesting. like i said the english people's party and this wish was behind the resolution basically in

thailand. so i think on the part of the party property as well. on top of endorsing the translating the party in order to match with 1932. i don't know how long this will last with this party. >> these seem to fall in place and so over taxing. has been wanting to come home.

you have many, many discussions including private interview. so many times and in different locations private dinner with him i was invited to dubai for he came home. and all of this time he was never, i always say, intention that i want to go home. so i know. i thought it was a joke. i thought it was a joke. back then so unlikely taxing. but then again i was so wrong.

i think the reason that happens i think it was would not be able to come forward. but then it becomes a win/win situation. it becomes when/when for taxes. and once again i was able to come home. second i want to reconcile with the elite. my party never losing the election. now is the right time, right? in 2005, 2006, 2011, 2009, 2019.

yes every time. so this time we have a real contender. and it could no longer dominate. the politics anymore., he could come home. he could use i would like to think the facts it was somehow delighted. as fighting for democracy for he might have wondered about an election. might even promotion of the taxes there. so okay.

[inaudible] so one thing using the party. the second one on top of that, by doing so it cause conflict and fragmentation among the two parties. some what they receive the party. we thought this could be perfect.t. with a lot of people i could have a good government.

but in fact in breaking them up we get the movement in thailand. the election also for taxes. i will say it would be loose as well. the facts party was denied it cost even more among -- hopefully this could be used wisely during the next election. that seemed to be the current

occupation. >> okay then after that we knew led by the party and somewhat taxing he's sort of somewhat well-known businessman. but have no party it was prime minister for years. and then he was ordered to step down. promoting someone who is not eligible. for a position. i was quite surprised. i thought it would be protected

at the same time it's a week apart. we definitely know the reason behind the inclusion of that movement party. and w then we had a new prime minister. who is the youngest daughter basically too soon to talk about. even though who is she? suddenly she became prime minister. even in south east asia it's not unique to thailand everywhere in southeast asia he would see the

philippines it happened in thailand two. that people think you immediately giving trust and credit to whom ever they think they are familyr with. she has been working for her father's business. i think it was her in the past year i think in that period leading up to coming home. while taxing he started to complicate that. and also and basically being a

speaker for her father. that basically allowing her to become connected to the public more. people see her more often. i'm not saying i don't think she has any whatsoever. but once again people become family with her. more than one time. more than one occasion i asked and they started a long time ago, about what things allow us to ship in the party. you have to think about your generation. you know, i have been issue of

trusting people. that's so then i came to look for someone whom i can trust in his can succeed me. you run out somewhere in your family. i had your brother-in-law, you had your sister and i have your daughter. who else could be next? something like that. this is an attitude. when the prime minister and immediately you know the media started to talk about she. and that's of keeping quiet about it.e art has something to say. i came out to the s public you

misunderstood the situation. what he said made it work. he said that. and he happened at this to. he said he used to work. [inaudible] it means influence, influencing. it means partial ownership. i'm not influence my daughter. in fact i owned her. i don't know these words or not. i'm not influencing her. i am warningin her. i am her father. but something seemed to get lost

in the statement. i am definitely, it's a puppet of a father. the father is running the show. but again the deal we made it as far as the party. but at one point taxing and can be of any use. don't know what can happen. there's so much uncertainty. ian have not even mentioned abot the upcoming obsession. i would need this for the q and a. thank you so much.&a [applause]

clicks the next will be q and a. will start with anybody who has questions. [inaudible] [inaudible conversations] [inaudible] with this goingg on used to hae relatives that were telling there. they reported there is true like 50 years ago. i am just warning you all of the

other rulers face. >> it all basically was enacted at the time of thehe century. so i think around 1910 something, right? i think looking back tried to think that, that was about the ending of the rain. we note with one of the usually right? so again, there's that sort of preparation.

in many ways so started to adopt a lot of things from the british. and secessions. i like being that to in order to come back and then with the surge of criticism. it was enacted. nobody used it that much all year. because after that 21932. definitely that's why they hate.

>> while your privilege. and then what came in 1946 the rise of 1959. the team had been so successful. i'm putting it back then which are became too cool. for anyone's eyes but that's why solo. you had to be so great. how could you criticize such great thing? you know what iri mean? that is what is so emotional powerful nobody wanted to criticize.

after the 2006 coup in the twilight. and started tope pressure. it's too much to long background. but to say that, he had me celebrate. all these to come back as early as 2006. but again the cases were too small because back in 2006 not going down. so in order to undermine what matters. it's very powerful. when you call a reckoning.

people talk more and more. it's very important. it has become our control and then lose more and more and more. >> ask any other questions? [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible]

[inaudible] i was told by a good friend the type of election that it was not. [inaudible] that could mean the party. that is a small reaction. i think it might be too soon to what happened then. it's not because i am in the kind of support of the movement.

i mean i admire them. i think that maybe we might do too much too soon. the correlation of had not that anything wrong. could be an area of someone else. or you have someone long dominated. that may be you might need more time that could be the case. there's something wrong. but you are right that the

anchor of the people. what happened in the election this time. that is one thing i keep reminding people. they are not angry enough. not angry it's difficult to move in society. and that talk more we are convinced they are true for example. to stay true. were not angry enough? this is something we speak too much. and i am afraid with the action

in 2023. [inaudible] that's another thing. >> thank you so much your presentation. [inaudible] i was wondering, do you think is interested in getting moreng involved to try to change things? i'm curious you went in there walked into canada you mean? >> okay.

so a lot of limitations. the point to be active in politics. back home influence and had a lot of limitations. as a lot of things we cannot do. it should be in thailand's number. definitely i started to see the engagement of people went out and go down and go down.

a very good example especially with the previous generation we are looking to different type of protector. basically they are older. and also not necessarily from the area. we were young anyway. that is one thing. the other thing also if we want to look as an example to think about the involvement of the young generation and real politics. not politics on the street. you also see that a number of successful candidate are quite young. i mean one of them we met she

likes to talk a lot. [laughter] what she won an election? as a member of the party. there's a number of people like her that join the party. providing more performance for younger o generation who becomea part of real politics and making it happen. they become so refreshing. you should look at this.

who was tested? china. yes,ck yes? good looking, rich, that wasn't bad. and then this party. i'm sorry this is elizabeth. that we need something lighter. he comes from a very rich family, four boys. and i think he is the second boy. ooking. they all helped him during the election campaign. they look like a fashion catalog.