>> in latest book titled, author focuses on the importance of technology on determining the world's future. author of 24 books holds the chair of geopolitics and chapter number 3 in his 177 page book kaplin claims civilization is now -- world in permanent crisis in this book of book notes plus with host brian lamb.

>> focus now on president trump's mike davis, first reminder of what the article 3 project. >> the article 3 project, a3p, fights for president trump's judicial nominees and fights against the law and fight for election integrity how are you ? guest: we started the project back in 2019 after the capitol confirmation because we saw there was a major void that we filled with the article three project and we are funded with private contributions, where people can go to article3project

and donate. host: you say you fight against lawfair, defined the term. guest: that is when you politicize law enforcement to go after your political enemies for non-crimes or non-violations. it is turning the legal system into another political weapon. host: a headline from the bbc, the trumpet ministration fires lawyers who investigated him. what is your view on that firing? >> i think president trump absolutely should do that. these justice department operatives engaged in an unprecedented law fair against president trump. they made up crimes against the president. it is not a crime for a former president to have his presidential records in the office of a former president, that is allowed by the presidential records act.

it's also not a crime to object to a presidential election, that is allowed by the electro account act of 1887. and if it were, you would see democrats in prison for objecting to republican wins in 1968, 2000, 2004 and 2016. we don't see al gore and hillary clinton and john kerry in prison, but they did try to put president trump in prison for objecting to the presidential election in 2020. host: what was your view of last friday's firing of some 17 inspectors general, although notably not specifically department of justice inspector general. guest: the president of the united states under article two of the constitution has the absolute power to fire executive branch officials. and it doesn't matter what statute congress tries to put in the way, you can't have a

statute trump the president's constitutional power. so the president has an absolute right to fire inspectors general. host: what is your view about the reshuffling of career staffers, the reassignments that we are hearing about out of the justice department, is this different than what takes place at the outset of a new administration went different political parties take over the federal agencies in washington? guest: these democrats prosecutors, biden democrat prosecutors at the justice department, at the state attorney general's office in new york and various da's offices in manhattan and arizona, they ran unprecedented democrat law fair and election interference against president trump. they tried to bankrupt him, they tried to throw him in prison. four times for non-crimes. they tried to take them off the

ballot in colorado and maine and elsewhere, unconstitutionally. they tried to take off his head when joe biden intentionally underfunded president trump's secret service protection and said that he is the greatest threat to democracy, he must be stopped at all costs and put a target on him. so the american people heard all of these allegations and all of this so-called evidence against president trump and the american people rendered our verdict on november 5, and president trump won in a landslide, three to electoral votes, all seven swing states, the popular vote. the american people rendered a verdict and that verdict was that we are going to end this lawfare, this weaponization of our intelligence agencies and our justice system and there must be accountability. and were starting to see that accountability now. people who waged this lawfare should be reassigned or fired

and they need to be held accountable. there needs to be several probes on what happened. there needs to be office of professional response ability probes at the justice department on these officials, they needs to be civil rights investigations because they violated president trump civil rights along with the civil rights of his top aides like steve bannon and peter navarro. who went to prison after serving 250 years of constitutional executive privilege going back to george washington. president trump supporters on january 6 were politically persecuted. yes, persecuted according to the supreme court fisher ruling. it wasn't just trump supporters, the biden justice department went after parents at abortion clinics including putting a 75 euros christian woman in prison for praying in an abortion clinic. they put the fbi after parents, outraged by gender chaos in schools and the resulting rapes

in high school bathrooms. and at the same time that joe biden and is justice department did this to trump and his top aides and his supporters and his allies, biden and his justice department gave amnesty to the much more deadly and destructive blm and nt for rioters. they gave amnesty to the planned parenthood abortion entry activists who terrorized catholic churches and pro-life crisis pregnancy centers, illegally obstructed justice by targeting supreme court justices outside of their homes with intimidation campaigns before their ruling on the dobbs decision. there needs to be accountability for what happens. we need to have new priorities in the justice department. the justice department should actually be going after the invasion of our southern border and the resulting rapes and murders and robberies and other

violence. i think that president trump and his justice department team are doing exactly the right and by read ira tithing the justice department, by real crimes and holding people accountable to weaponize the justice department against lytic lebanese. host: mike davis of the article three project with us for about the next half hour this morning. if you have questions, comments for him, democrats, republicans and independents phone lines as usual, put the numbers up on the screen for you. you say hey need to be multiple probes about what happened. is it lawfare to investigate elastic ministrations investigators? guest: know, because we would actually be investigating real crimes here. it is a very serious federal civil rights ellen a -- felony. conspiracy against rights, to politicize and weaponize intelligence agencies and law

enforcement against your political enemies for non-crimes. and so when you do that, that is the most dangerous thing you can do in our intel agencies, in our legal system. there has to be accountability for that so it never happens again and wrinkly, this goes back to crossfire hurricane, the russian collusion hoax. here is right here. you had hillary clinton with her illegal home server as the secretary of state with our nation most classified secrets, more problematically, for hillary is it had evidence of the clinton foundation pay for play foreign bribery schemes where the clinton foundation has taken millions of dollars from these shady foreign actors and hillary clinton is the secretary of state at this time. this money going into the clinton foundation is underwriting the clinton's lavish lifestyle around the world where they are taking private jets and living like hollywood actors.

what was hillary clinton doing as secretary of state in exchange for these millions of dollars in donations to the clinton foundation? was there quid pro quo foreign corruption, was there foreign bribery? we will never know because hillary clinton destroyed her home server, bleached her home server, took hammers to the phone. after a congressional subpoena so it is obstruction of justice. she thought this evidence went away, but maybe, just maybe that home server was hacked by our worst enemies including russia, and maybe just maybe as hillary clinton was running for president in 2016, she is worried that this material of her foreign corruption will come out before the 2016 election, and so her campaign had worked with a law firm and made up the steel dossier, they made up the russian collusion hoax, they lied to the court, they got spy warrants on then presidential candidate donald trump, they continued to spy on him as the president of the united states,

they hobbled his presidency. this is the biggest scandal in american history. you say that is not possible, how could you possibly think they could do that? they did the same thing with hunter biden's laptop with the biden corruption. 51 former intel officials said it had all the hallmarks of a russian disinformation campaign. they got the new york post, america's oldest newspaper deplatformed from social media. they made it where you couldn't even pull up the story. people would have known about hunter's laptop before 2020. there's no chance that biden would have been in the white house for four years. host: let me get you some call this because there's plenty for you already and we have you for less than 25 minutes this morning. this is lizzie in indiana, democrat, go ahead. caller: yes, hello, mike. guest: hello. caller: thank you, c-span. my question is how can people

from the trump administration, they are putting in the worst people possible to run our country, and the reason is he is trying to get rid of the people that run the government because they are trying to take over the government to run it as a dictatorship. and i will have nothing of that, and i know there's lots of people out here that do not want a dictatorship, especially with donald trump being the dictator. this this needs to be stopped and they need to be accounted for. they need -- they need to be accounted for doing their crimes. host: mike. guest: i would say when you have a president of the united states when a president -- win a presidential election it's his job to take over the executive

branch. and get rid of the political appointees from the last administration. and put in his political appointees. we'll carry out his policy agenda the american people elected him to carry out. guest: this is joe in dayton, ohio, republican. good morning. caller: good morning from a sunny day in ohio. good morning, mr. davis. i want to tell you i love. i watch you on youtube. you are a breath of fresh air. all these cases against donald trump are bogus. there was no insurrection on january 6. donald trump did request troops on january 3. general milley testified under oath on that. but no one wants to report that. the judge case has more holes than swiss cheese. and letisha james will lose her $500 million case in new york. the grand jury, that was a disaster. these democrats love to use the

word fascism, dictator, adolph hitler, mussolini. not one person in this country has ever lived under a dictatorship or fascist. my parents did under mussolini. but these people today want to put labels on donald trump and it's sad. mr. davis, the reason for this call, i love you. keep up the good work. thank you. guest: i appreciate that very much. host: barbara, oklahoma, independent, good morning. caller: hi. i just -- can't watch you all anymore. i don't understand this thing where we don't have facts on here. you just let him go off on hillary. hillary's not in the government. hillary did nothing. you all -- everything they did -- oh, my goodness. i don't get it. i like the last guy. he was honest. i didn't agree with him with everything. but he was honest. this man is one of the liars you have on here every day. three hours of lies.

destroying our country. and i don't understand c-span. you have never been like this before. you have -- oh, my gosh. you just -- just really -- it's something. and every day i wonder -- i can't. i'm not going to watch you. i don't. i can't stand it. i have to turn it every day because these lies. puke up lies on us every single day. host: barbara. mike davis, anything you want to talk about? guest: i appreciate it, barbara. host: richard, montreal, canada, good morning. caller: good morning. mike, love your work by the way. do you think pam bondi will investigate demonization and banning of early treatment drugs during the pandemic like hydroxy chlorine that led to hundreds of thousands of needless deaths and forcing us to take an experimental vaccine.

i know several people injured by the vaccine. they want justice. they want accountability. thank you. guest: there's so much that went wrong with covid. it started with tony fauci. he's probably very happy he got his pardon from joe biden because i think tony fauci committed crimes when he illegally funded covid in the wuhan lab from n.i.h. through a subcontractor. which was illegal. gain of function research is illegal to fund. he did -- tony fauci did it anyway. he lied about it to congress. he instructed -- obstructed the investigations. he covered it up. he conspired with others. this led to trillions of dollars in lost treasure. millions of lost lives. years of learning loss for kids. particularly poor black kids who are already at a huge

disadvantage. and years of unnecessary suffering. human misery because of covid. there has to be accountability. and then after this covid came out, when they were pushing the vaccine at all costs, and not any of the therapeutics and pushing a mask mandate, a cloth mask mandate that does not work. a six-foot rule not based upon the science. how much disruption did tony fauci cost to his lives. he may have his biden pardon, but he must be held accountable. he must be brought before congress. host: you mentioned covid and the response and vaccines. expect to hear a lot more of that today at 0 a.m. less than an hour -- 10 a.m. less than an hour. the confirmation hearing for r.f.k. junior for health and human services secretary. he'll be before the senate finance committee. that's where we'll go after this

program today. if you stick here on c-span. mike davis, you talked about dr. do you think presidential uses of pardon is something that can be used as law fair? lawfare? guest: the president has very broad power to pardon anyone he wants for the most part for federal crimes. and it is an important safeguard for presidents to have this pardon power because it's supposed to correct injustices. the president has every right to pardon the -- president biden had every right to pardon tony fauci and his family. he had every legal right to do it. i think politically it was disastrous for joe biden to pardon his family. they said when president trump was doing pardons the democrats said when president trump was doing pardons that you only pardon people who are guilty of crimes. he -- biden preemptively pardoned his family.

and it is probably because his family took over $23 million from our worst enemies into their bank accounts. that's just not speculation. there are bank statements that house oversight chairman james comber has subpoenaed -- comber -- comer -- comer, showing it comes into their pwa*pg accounts. except for the 6-year-old granddaughter. even those these biden family members have their pardons, there phaoedz to be accountability. we need to have an intel assessment to see what china and russia and kazakhstan and every other hellhole around the world why they were paying the bides. every bide -- bidens. every biden family member. from vice president joe biden and president joe biden. host: on pardons, a discussion of pardons on the senate floor yesterday, specifically the

pardons of those convicted of crimes in relation to january 6. this is from senate minority whip particular durbin on the senate floor about a minute and a half. >> the mob, the insurrectionist mob was taking over the capitol. thousands of people were storming into this building. not for a peaceful demonstration by any means. but sadly for violence and destruction. that day was the worst day i can recall in the history of the senate in terms of our respect for this building. it has become a symbol not only for the united states, but for the world, for peace and democracy. and i thought of those poor capitol policemen who were asked to defend us with their lives. they were asked to risk their lives for us. and they did. four or five of them lost their lives as a result of it. over 140 were seriously injured. some of the things that were done to them were outrageous.

you have seen the videotape. they don't -- we don't have to speculate what it was. we saw it as they tore down building structures. as they beat up on these cops. as many of them faced death and knew at the time it was that serious. the grimace reality of those riots was the subsequent death of 5 of these law enforcement officers. and the injuries to approximately 140 others. many of whom still pay that price to this day. host: mike davis, that speech on the senate floor as senate democrats attempted to pass a resolution condemning donald trump's pardon of those convicted of january 6 crimes. what did you think about that effort on the floor yesterday? guest: just total nonsense. dick durbin knows bert. he called this an insurrectionist mob when he knows that no one was ever charged with insurrection after the biden justice department ran

the biggest law enforcement operation in american history and charged over 1,000 people -- they couldn't find evidence at all of insurrection because it didn't happen. january 6 was a lawful protest, committed by the national park service that devolved into a riot. there were three categories of people there who were at the capitol that day. there were people who were outside, even if you think they are crazey, they are wrong, they have an absolute first amendment right to be there. then there were people who trespassed who should have been charged with trespass. and people who were violent who should have been charged more harshly. like dick dishin did, the biden justice department lumped them together. said they were all insurrectionists. treat the them like they were enemies of the state. persecuted them for four years. yes the supreme court's decision makes clear they persecuted these january 6 defendants.

at the same time that they persecuted these january 6 defendants, overcharged them, kept them in pretrial detention for too long. kept them in solitary confinement, abused them in the d.c. jail. they gave amness at this to the much -- amnesty to the b.l.m. rioters who cause more than a billion in damage and killed people. those police officers that died at the capitol that day. they didn't die that day, but the police officers who died, that was very unfortunate. that was not caused by the riots that day. they were not killed at the riot that day. particular durbin's making it sound like the riot killed five bliss officers that day. that's just -- police officers that day. that's not true. i would say this people who are concerned about president trump pardoning and commuting the sentences of these january 6 defendants who were persecuted, i'll say this. they have suffered enough. over the last four years.

where the hell were these people who are concerned about january 6 pardons, where are their concerns about joe biden pardoning a monster who murdered two f.b.i. agents. the joe biden freed this man from prison. he commuted the sentence. he commuted his life sentence and freed this man from prison after he killed two f.b.i. agents. i don't want to hear the fake tears from dick durbin about police officers when joe biden freed this monster who killed two f.b.i. agents. host: more calls. mark in austin, texas. democrat, good morning. caller: yes. good morning, mike. i am just want to say, you know, you guys sitting here defending donald trump when you know this man is absolutely the worst. the worst ever. and for all the trump supporters that are out there, he used you guys. you guys were used for idiots

for him. you should tattoo that on your forehead. thank you. host: do you want to respond? guest: i would say that you're calling over half of america tpao*uls idiots. you -- useful idiots. half of the american voters useful idiots who just elected president trump in a landslide. 312 electoral votes. all seven swing states. the popular vote. i would say that caller might be the useful idiot of the democrat party. host: philip, mississippi, independent. good morning. caller: good morning. this gentleman has the nerve to be such a hypocrite and talking about all the democrats. but not looking at self. remember jesus, if that's what you know of his name, the spiritual leader of this country, were to say if you're going to judge, look at the beam in your eye before you make that judgment. the republicans are famous for

that now. they just automatically take the highroad when they are the most sanctified group of people helping the american public. and it's the furthest from the truth. host: philip, do you have a question for mike davis? caller: my question is, how do they go about recruiting the members to go and tell us the hypocritical statements that they make each and every day. and this country has been doing it for over 400 years. please tell us how they can say things that they say and get up in the morning and go on a normal basis. host: that's film. mike davis. guest: i would say i can't fix stupid. this is why we need school choice in america. host: victoria, texas. republican. good morning. caller: good morning. thank you, c-span. mr. davis, for taking my call. please hear me out. please hear me out. there must be some accountability. i am not a politician. i am a former veteran, educator,

and i'm not ignorant. this is very personal to me and i would love to say for the last four years i have been going through living hell. i am glad to see trump come in and do something with justice. my home was pending in litigation that was sold for $585,000. the dallas d.a. judge refused to indict the people that sold my home illegally on a crime. what kind of d.a. is that? just so soros put a lot into our elections. these d.a.'s in the united states, georgia, new york, dallas, including uphold the rule of law. host: victoria in texas. mike davis, explain what the role of d.a.'s are. how quickly they change over when it comes to a new

administration. guest: the district attorneys are generally elected at the local level. local prosecutors. they play a crucial role. they are the ones who handle the day-to-day crimes in your communities. if you have a bad d.a. like a george soros funded d.a. like manhattan d.a., alvin bragg, or fulton county d.a., fani willis, or one of these other terrible d.a.'s like in philadelphia it can cause utter chaos in your communities. if you don't have a local d.a. who is going to fight crime, and then you have a justice department, for example, like the biden justice department, who didn't want to fight real crimes, they wanted to fight -- they wanted to fight against republicans and trump supporters and parents and christians instead of criminals, you have a real problem. this is why these elections are so critically important. you should pay attention to your local races. pay attention to your local

sheriff, your local mayor, your local d.a. because they have the tremendous impact on your lives. host: i guess the difference between a d.a. and a u.s. attorney, u.s. attorney's the one that change over in a new administration. guest: yeah. there are u.s. attorneys all over the country. i think it's like 94 right now. 93 or 94. i can't remember the number. that are u.s. attorneys. they are nominated by the president. they are confirmed by the senate. and they are the chief law enforcement officer of your federal district. most states have one or two of these districts where they have one or two u.s. attorneys. some states have more. like california i think has four. they are the ones for supervising federal law enforcement. host: why are their some u.s. attorneys, some districts in this country where us they operate that we hear more from an others, southern district of

new york, here in d.c., the virginia district as women. why are some-tkoeurpbts want to say more famous, but more from some than others. guest: for example d.c. is our seat of government. the eastern district of virginia, which is just outside of d.c., covers the c.i.a., the pentagon, a lot of government agencies. the southern district of new york covers wall street, the financial sector. those are -- tend to be the biggest offices. also the southern districts of florida, miami has a big office. the central district of california or l.a. has a big office. but the major offices are d.c., eastern district of virginia, and southern district of new york. host: you have gone through a lot of these confirmation hearings. you talk about they all get senate confirmed. can you talk about your whack ground -- background in that process, what you did on capitol hill, what role you played. guest: i was the chief counsel for nominations on the senate judiciary committee for then

chairman chuck grassley back in 2017 to 2019. i helped with the first two years of the trump administration to confirm president trump's justice department officials along with his federal judges. including justice gorsuch, my former boss, who i helped lead his confirmation effort. as his former law clerk from the outside. i went to work for the senate judiciary committee. confirmed a record number of president trump's lower court judges. and then helped confirm justice kavanaugh to the supreme court. then i started the article 3 project after that in 2019. we helped confirm justice amy coney barrett. for the last 3 1/2 years we have been very busy working on this lawfare against president trump. turning lemons into lemonade. these democrats thought these indictments, these civil lawsuits, were going to take out president trump.

electorally. we did 4,200 media hits supporting, defending president trump constant social media, constant opinion pieces. we changed the public opinion on this lawfare. we coined the phrase. it ended up not working out so well on november 5 when the american people rendered our verdict. i. host: you talk about judicial appointments. a chart from the pugh research service -- pew research service on judicial appointments over the years. it was 174 -- 226 total in the first trump administration. you talk about the record there. the joe biden administration we'll say they had a record at 228. you can see the numbers in the previous years. why -- how are there -- this many judicial vacancies that get filled? why does each administration seem to set a record? guest: i'll tell you the reason we set a record under president trump is because i helped break

every piece of china in the senate to get through the democrats' unprecedented obstruction to help president trump confirm a near record number of judges to the federal courts. particularly the critically important federal courts of appeals. president trump when he started out he -- the democrat appointed judges controlled the federal courts of appeals. by the time president trump left we had the first constitutionalist majority in 90 years on the supreme court. along with the majority of the critically important federal courts of appeals that had republican appointed judicial majorities. president biden was able to make up for a lot of that in that four-year term. we set up a conveyor belt. and unfortunately president biden took advantage of that convey. it would have been disastrous from my perspective if biden or harris won in november because

they would likely be able to appoint a jump of justices en-- appoint a number of justices and take control of the supreme court. i think when left wing justices take control of the supreme court, there goes our god-given rights to speak, worship, associate, and protect ourselves. host: how many justices do you expect to step down from the supreme court in the next four years? guest: i don't know. if you look at their tradition, i think president trump will at least appoint one justice to the supreme court. in his second term he could appoint two or three. host: for calls a few minutes left in the segment with mike davis. the aeurticle iii project. terry in illinois, democrat. good morning. caller: good morning. i have two subjects. one is about the hillary clinton foundation. we all know that president trump during his first term all wait through it, in fact i think it was right at the last year where he dropped it, because he couldn't find one bit of

evidence against hillary clinton. two, i want to talk about this lawfare. aim talking about the hush money payment and we know that he assaulted her. and a jury of his peers found him guilty. and did he this to interfere with the election at that time by hiding the information that he was sleeping with the porn star. while his wife was at home. i understand this lawfare, but the democrats learned that from the republicans. all you have to do is look back through the years, especially the clinton years, they went after him for tea parties in the white house. selling the lincoln bedroom. the hordes of -- hoards of women that came through that said he sectionually assaulted -- host: let me give mike davis a

chance to respond. guest: i would say this. if you want the goods on hillary clinton, wait until crossfire hurricane records come out. president trump declassified them the day before he left office the first time. the intel community, the law enforcement agencies like the f.b.i. ran to mark meadows, the white house chief of staff at the time said you can't release these, you'll violate the privacy act, criminal violation of the privacy act. you'll reveal sources and methods. mark meadows issued an order on january 20, 2021 saying do your privacy act review and get out these crossfire hurricane declassified records. they didn't do that review. instead they did the mar-a-lago raid. that's what this lawfare is all about. 24 time -- this time when president trump releases these crossfire hurricane records i think people will see how damning the evidence is against hillary and obama and biden and clapper and brennan and all these other people who

politicized and weaponized intel agencies to take out president trump. that's number one. it's kind of amusing he picked the weakness case possible against president trump. the hush money case. it is not a crime to settle a nuisance claim. it is routine in business to settle nuisance claims with a nondisclosure agreement. that happens every day. i have been a lawyer for nearly 20 years. i have done that routinely. i didn't realize i was commit ago felony by settling a nuisance claim with a nondisclosure provision in that agreement. or hush money provision. it's certainly not a campaign finance violation. the prior manhattan d.a. declined to bring these charges. the manhattan u.s. attorney declined to bring these charges. the democrat manhattan u.s. attorney. the democrat federal election commission declined to bring these charges.

alvin bragg himself, who campaigned on getting trump, declined to bring these charges. it wasn't until matthew was deployed from the number three office in the biden justice department they decided to bring these charges and the first indictment ever against a former president. the only reason they brought it because they knew trump was running for president again. host: if the hush money case was the weakest case against donald trump as you described it, what in your estimation was the strongest case? guest: would probably be -- look, i don't think that there is a legal basis for this, but the -- on the documents case in mar-a-lago, the obstruction case, would be the strongest case against president trump. but the issue is, there is an office of legal counsel memo from 2019, it's binding on the executive branch. of course jack smith ignored this memo, so did merrick garland. -but it says this, if you don't have an underlying crime, you

cannot obstruct justice for a noncrime. if it's not a crime forepresident trump to have -- for president trump to have his presidential records in the office of former president mar-a-lago which is allowed by the presidential act, the subpoena issued based upon the espionage act is invalid because there is not an espionage act violation when the presidential act allows the president to have his records. so the olc memo from 2019 would suggest you can't obstruct justice when there is not a crime. host: a couple more calls. michelle, staten island, republican. good morning. caller: good morning. mike, thank you for being on. i just -- i have something to say and then i have a question. first i'd like to say, what a crew we have working this country. that the other countries have to be laughing. they have to be. come on. this is ridiculous what's going on. the people today with this hearing today is just -- i'm an

r.n. god forbid he gets this position, i don't know what's going to go on. host: you talking about r.f.k. jr.'s confirmation hearing. caller: correct. kids are going to drop like flies. this is horrible. this is really horrible. and why is trump doing all this? 38 felony counts. no president has 38 felony accounts. this is horrible. you are a lawyer. guest: i think the american people heard all of these allegations and evidence against president trump and the american people rendered our verdict. on november 5. the american people know that this was lawfare. they know it was election interference. these were bogus charges brought by democrat prosecutors and democrat judges and democrat juries and democrat hell holes like new york, d.c., and atlanta. and the american people not

these whack jobs in these democrat hell holes get to select the president. host: john's last, temple hills, maryland, independent. good morning. caller: good morning. first of all i would like to say good morning to all of the c-span listeners. we are dedicated listeners. we sometimes do a lot of stuff. mike davis, good morning, sir. guest: good morning. caller: i am an independent. and i am an independent for a reason. i would love to have a colloquy with with you, sir, i know we don't have time. four questions four and i would will have for c-span listeners to listen to your answers and be objective with when they hear them. the first question is, is donald trump perfect? guest: no. caller: let me finish before and i'll get off the line you can answer. the first question was is donald trump perfect? the second question is, is there anything that you can think of that donald trump has done wrong?

third question, biden, is biden perfect? fourth question, and last question, i'll get off and hear offline. is there anything in biden's whole career that you can say that he did right? thank you so much, mike. listen to the answers off line. host: you get the final two minutes. guest: this is pretty easy, no, president trump's not perfect. he made mistakes in his first term, including picking bad personnel. president biden is not perfect, but one thing president biden did right, and i've said this publicly, he picked very good people for the justice department antitrust division and the federal trade commission to do bipartisan antitrust law enforcement to hold the trillion dollar big tech accountable, google, amazon, facebook, and apple. that start under president trump. president biden continued that

and put it on steroids, and now president trump is going to continue it again. host: appreciate your time this morning

[applause]