talking about booker t. washington and some of you disagree that washington in fact is a similar figure that i have insisted that he is. because i made a statement in class that many of you when i said washington was the most important and most influential african-american leader until the election of president barack obama. he is even more significant in some ways because booker t. washington was never elected to public office. president barack obama was elected president of the united states and he is not a black leader. he is a leader of the free world and also the leader of course of our country. when we look at african-american leadership coming out of the 19th century into the 20th and even the 21st sen scli i maintain that booker t. washington has no peers.

some of you disagree with that. so i make my case today that you can in fact agree or disagree with. we start of course with washington's birth. this is the original structure, home in which booker t. washington was born. you remember from slavery he talks about his humble beginnings and we said that washington is establishing his , kind his credibility of street cred as a black leader. in order to entury establish your credentials as a race leader you have to have been a slave. so at the beginning of up from slavey he establishes his street credibility so to speak, right? that he was a slave right? we know he wasn't a slave for very long because slavery ended when he was 12 years old. we also know that because slavery ended so early, in

washington's life, that he may not have experienced the full import and weight of slavery because it ended when he was 12 years old. we know before the import of slavery it usually did not rest upon slave children fully until they reached puberty. so washington was a slave and he tells us some things about slavery but he also tells us that he had no bad feelings, no real, he harbored no real malice toward those people who were his owners. in fact, he even says his owner was not particularly bad. hat seems to be oxy moronic, problematic thinking of someone owning you, a slave master as not really a bad person. the whole idea of just owning a slave itself is terrible it seems to many of us but this was the actual cottage, the actual house in which booker t.

washington was born. then we know that washington ent on to distinguish himself. skipping a whole bunch of stuff because of time here but washington went on to distinguish himself. in his autobiography washington lls us of his route to tuskegee institute and he says that there are some things that happened to him and decisions he had to make that contributed to him going to tuskegee institute. what are some of those decisions and things that happened to him? >> he had to work to find money to pay there. he didn't have enough money so he learned the dignity of labor to claim the spot at hampton university before he made it to tuskegee. >> he learned the dignity of labor, right. in terms of working in order to achieve so that he could pay

his way into tuskegee institute. for his entrance exam he says it was a particular event that happened before his entrance exam. what was that event? >> i can't remember the name of the woman but she helped him realize the value in labor. he was like a servant in their house cleaning to make sure everything was in tip top condition and that helped him realize the dignity and value of labor. >> right. mrs. ruppner. in fact, he values that experience so much with mrs. she taught he says him not only the value and dignity of labor but taught him many lessons he uses throughout his life. he credits her for much of his success. right? so washington tells us that there is a value here of hard work. here is a value of morality.

he values being able to pay our own way so to speak. undergirding it is washington's belief that the problems with people of african descent is they came out of slavery as a dependent group. remember we discussed this, right? he is trying to find a way, articulating a way to move african-americans from dependency to independence, right? and so washington says there are some things you need in order to move from dependency to independence. there are some resources you have to have. what are some of those things washington discusses up from slavery? one of the most important things washington focuses on aside from the acts of going through freedom is the

discipline. that is why he is discussing slavery so much and up from slavery. [ comment inaudible] >> okay. it was extremely important, discipline. yes. another hand up. all right. resources what things did they eed right? >> the way to use skills in positive ways. >> kneed skills. we discussed -- we discussed this. the problem that some folks sometimes look at washington get ahead ofmes they themselves and say washington was advocating economic uplift. he was advocating that. washington was advocating industrial education. , a workding all of this

ethic, values, discipline, etc.. if you give all of this to someone who does not have discipline, you are wasting these resources because they will not know what to do with them. so, washington is making an argument here that somehow people of african descent coming developlavery have to the discipline necessary to carry them forward. so washington uses his own life as an example of the kind of discipline people of african dissent ought to have. roots, wheret his ,e slept under the boardwalk

goes on his journey, he gets to hampton, and he remembers the about how tot clean, and he says that was my entrance examination. in terms of the building blocks, hardve the discipline, the work, the lessons that mrs. ruffner taught him. -- then he meets a man. remember him? armstrong? what did armstrong teach him? >> [indiscernible] >> the dignity of labor. why was it important to see labor in a dignified way for people of african dissent -- descent?

yes. >> slaves were these physical bodies at were only fit for physical labor, so they learned that labor was something to be ashamed of and shy away from and they were looking for washington be proud of something. >> labor, being distinguished from toil, in a sense, with you working, but not benefiting from that labor. plus you have no vested interest because someone else is getting the reward. as a slave, you are working, but you are not reaping the benefits. you were making someone else wealthy. , coloneln says armstrong taught me the dignity of labor. and he tries to emphasize labor

as something that is dignified because washington is attempting to establish an economic base for people of african descent, right? 1895, what is also known as the atlanta compromise, washington is accused of being an accommodationist because he says black people instead of going north and leaving the south -- they are leaving land, leaving their heritage, leaving the possibilities for independence economically. they are going in search of education, right? political rights. is less social pressure. get away from the ku klux klan, etc. and they are going in search of jobs. washington says instead of going to the north in order to find these things, stay in the south. the background of this is in the

south, african americans own considerable leases -- pieces of land coming out of slavery. there was a group of african-americans who had never been slaves and many of them were landowners. , many slaves coming out of slavery -- now they are free. masters who had considerable sums of land gave some land to their former slaves . and so african-americans had land. arethird group was -- there many african-americans who, after coming out of slavery, were able to purchase their own lands later on. so, you have african-americans who have some land in the south. this in america was seen as the basis of wealth. can maken said if we

this land functional and work for us, we can establish an economic base. if we can establish an economic base, the political and the social arenas of life will be .asier to achieve political rights will follow. follow.ights will once we get an economic base. washington is looking at the example of immigrants -- that immigrants already had established. they had come in and within a generation or so, they had established their own economic foundation. washington is looking at immigrants and saying, black people can do that, too. of course, that is a little bit shortsighted. we can criticize washington and say he is looking at immigrants

this way and saying black people can do the same thing. these people came as immigrants. they did not speak the language. they did not know anything about american society. but within one generation, they pulled themselves out of their .ower-class status why can't african-americans do that? we have been here a lot longer. african-americans have an advantage over the immigrants. they speak english. they are americans. they have the right, in order to make america function for them. washington was saying african-americans ought to do like the immigrants. that is a bit shortsighted because immigrants could claim and often did claim later on that they were in fact white. they did not have the same physical distinctions that people of african distant past and secondly immigrants were

never slaves. they were never defined as property. just aton's analysis is little bit shortsighted. but his point nevertheless is that african-americans need to establish an economic base. once you became the headmaster at tuskegee institute, many people say he founded tuskegee institute. that is not true. he did not start tuskegee institute. he did take over once tuskegee had been-- institute founded, ok? and he built it from there. ofs is a picture of the site tuskegee institute when it was first purchased, first bought. there were two told things, twol on -- there were buildings, still on tuskegee campus. those buildings have been restored. they are trying to maintain the original architecture, etc.

folks say it is being used as dormitories. if you get to the tuskegee institute, you can see these two buildings. but can you imagine starting this way? diaries, he tells us about starting at tuskegee institute. he tells us about the people, the demographic, the educational level, how people were living, etc., right? and washington tells us that the washington -- that the communities surrounding tuskegee, that he is looking at thepool of students and support for the institution is in what condition? what condition is that community and would you say? -- is that community in, would

you say? how would you describe it? yes? the term would be ignorant. some black families had enough aney where they could buy clock, but no one knew how to read the clock. or they had enough money to buy a piano, but no one could play the piano. they did not know how to use it. >> they knew that you had it. these things signified that you made it. if you have a piano, you have a have knives and forks. do not even know how to use them, right? we washington says somehow have to get this community, this community of people, implemented of the state -- it appalled booker t. washington that a large proportion of african-americans were stuck in

at this time. he said, somehow we have to get these people from here to here, right? so they can become more independent. and so we have the original building of tuskegee institute. porter hall. erected onuilding the tuskegee campus. that is a picture of porter hall after it was first erected. the significance of this, booker t. washington is attempting to build an institution. he believes if people of african descent are going to progress, they must do through institutions. they cannot do so individually. throught do so education. so, porter hall, the first building erected on campus. of course, we know that booker t. washington emphasized what he called "industrial education."

industrial education. another way of putting it later practical 1920's -- education. industrial education. and that is the education that one needed in order to make the land profitable. , whatgton's argument was good was it for people of african descent to be able to quote shakespeare or edgar allan poe, when they could not make the land provide? ,f you have 50 acres of land you have very little use for shakespeare or edgar allen poe. not that it is a bad thing to know it. oe.edgar allan p not that it is a bad thing to

know it. but you need the skills and the knowledge base to make that land productive. , womene we have people learning how to till the fields, to plants, to reap the harvest from the fields. we also know that washington --o gave students ownership ownership action in the -- we also know that washington also gave students ownership, ownership, in the development of tuskegee institute. he also had a kind of on the job training system for the students. they participated in the building of their own institution. i thought that was very interesting. don't you? we don't do that here at mercer.

we have got to help students, would you help us erected football stadium? get a shovel. that kind of thing. it is probably a good idea. we probably would not have as good a one as we have here. but washington, making an argument here that people of african descent need to participate in their own uplifting. goes back tohere the failures of reconstruction. washington believes that the problem -- the primary problem with reconstruction and the efforts of reconstruction and especially the freedman's bureau, was that -- apart from not being funded, that also that it created a system of people of african

descent. peoplehington thought if of african distant are going to prosper, going to become more upwardly mobile, they must do so through economic independence. the way you get there, are theon argues, values he has already displayed on his road to becoming the director of tuskegee institute. here, the students building the foundation for a building at tuskegee institute. they were physically building it. he also tells us that at tuskegee institute, it becomes known for brick masons, and they develop in fact a kind of organization, you might say. a business. brick masonry. training students to become brick masons and also training them to run those businesses. he tells us that various

businesses in america can't wait for tuskegee students to beforete -- to graduate they already have jobs. so, we have the economic model, because of washington's prolific of resourceskinds and turning out these kinds of students, as well as his acumen politically and his accommodationist discourse, washington became known as the creator of what folks called the tuskegee machine. they referred to the tuskegee institute as the tuskegee machine. , during this -- here is a picture -- so washington was doing this. here is a picture of washington at tuskegee institute speaking.

he was a prolific speaker. one thing people do not realize about booker t. washington was preacher.icensed he had been to seminary. he said he believed he had been called to preach, but when he started meeting other black ministers, he lost interest because he did not respect them. he said they were a group of folks that were just taking of thege african-american population. they were uneducated. they did not have the interest of the people, of the masses in their hearts. and in fact, they were simply in it for themselves. thewashington gets out of ministry, but he maintains the discourse of the black ministry, when washington spoke, apparently it was an event. you listen to recordings of washington speaking, it is

riveting, the manner with which he spoke. crowds, thousands of people would come out to hear booker t. washington speak. here.speaking again laying the word down. booker t. washington. not only with tuskegee institute did booker t. washington make a significant impact. we talked about washington and his impact as well with other -- 's, thatcall now hbcu because of washington's influence he was able to open up opportunities for other hbcu's to become land-grant colleges. to get not only land, but moneys from the state and the federal government. and because of booker t. hbcu's becameny

proficient and also viable. although by 1900, tuskegee institute boasted an endowment of $1.5 million. that was a lot of money back then. that is a lot of money now, as far as i'm concerned. that was a lot of money back then to have as an endowment, especially for a black university. then, booker t. washington starts the national negro business league. here's a picture of the national negro business league. started again the process of moving the african-american to independence through the establishment of businesses that would be viable. it is important to understand that washington was working during an era where there is

segregation. whateveron meant that people of african descent were going to do or have access to was going to happen within the sphere of influence where black people live. right here in macon, georgia, there were areas where people of dissents lived. if you wanted a lawyer, a dentist, a teacher -- they had to live within an area within the african-american community. thecould not go over to side of town where the white people lived. so, stores, businesses, the economy within the black community had to be of that variety. reasons it was driving was because of the national negro business league

that booker t. washington established. they would promote not only the development of black businesses, but also help black businesses along. say, awanted to start, grocery store or a clothing store or any kind of business. farming equipment. aid and help from the national negro business league. so, booker t. washington put that together. as efforts after the publication of "up from slavery" it won him acclaim, nationally and internationally such that booker t. washington became not only the most significant, the most powerful and well-known african-american leader in america, but also he

became internationally famous. and internationally known. this was an era where there was no twitter. there was not cable. there was no facebook, no cell phones, none of that. success andomeone's celebrity status traveled primarily through the newspapers , and also word-of-mouth and also books and other print materials. and booker t. washington, in fact, was invited to dinner at in 1901. house roosevelt.eddy this was very significant because washington was the first african american who had ever been invited to dinner at the white house. and he was criticized for that by some. many of whom were what you might call haters.

why him and not me? that kind of thing. also, president roosevelt recognized washington for his and had literally almost appointed washington as a consulate, as a primary advisor for the affairs of people of african descent. so, booker t. washington served blacklly the first presidential adviser on behalf of people of african descent as well as american indians. very, veryton is important in this respect. roosevelt,dent roosevelt's wife were frequent visitors to tuskegee institute. not only the president -- president roosevelt, but many dignitaries. one of the reasons why and the

primary reason why washington was able to amass such a large endowment at tuskegee institute was because his funding primarily came from liberal, white people who were very, very rich. carnegie.ellers, what is now the rockefeller foundation and the carnegie foundation, but in that era, they were living, breathing people who founded these companies, who were in fact contributors and supporters of tuskegee institute. and so, we have it here a picture of theodore roosevelt, that is theodore roosevelt with booker t. washington at tuskegee institute. controversial picture of booker t. washington. this is a controversy all statue. this is at tuskegee institute.

controversial statue. even today you will see that statue there. the statue is of booker t. washington, and the man crouching down is a slave. blanket symbolic of like a veil, and booker t. is lifting the veil off of the slave's phase such that his eyes can see and -- such that his eyes can see and move onto something better. those who are detractors of booker t. washington raise the question, was washington lifting or veil off the slave's eyes putting him down farther? because of his accommodationist beliefs? he believed the best thing for people of african dissents to do was not -- african dissents --

do was not to pursue political and social equality at that time. that would come later. he did later say he still believed that black people ought to have the right to vote and afforded that right -- and if afforded that right they ought to go and exercise the vote. but that ought not be the primary objective, the number one priority of people of african distant. so, this monument raises a critical question. there are people who have problems with booker t. washington. i think that is the source of the problem in many ways. was washington in fact leading the way, opening the path to greater opportunity for people of african descent? or was he trying somehow to retard rugrats brat

african-americans -- retard americans?r african of my come to the end part. you will have an opportunity to argue with me. we have booker t. washington starting the tuskegee institute in 1881. the network of hbcu's, during his lifetime, from 1900 to 1915, when he dies. the legacy, of course, continues after that. the national negro business league, started in 1900. that was a tremendous thing for people of african distant -- economically. and washington supported and even helped found a string of newspapers and this was important because newspapers

were the primary method through african wouldf receive information, but also people would place ads and businesses would flourish because of african american newspapers. contribute to literacy. so, african american newspapers were extremely important. -- then there are those that those detractors of booker t. washington's. many woulde legacy argue. at the top of this, the atlanta exposition address, which many would argue is in fact the atlanta compromise. 1895, atlanta, the industrial exposition. you have read that speech, so you know booker t. washington, we said, might even play into this racist structure, paradigm

for people of african descent or labor, when he said let us work until we build. making a good date for people who argue -- making a critique for people who argue that the reason reconstruction failed was people of african descent did not participate fully as they should have. washington does not even address that argument. he says, let us work. of course when he says that, he plays into this idea of black says workers and that is all that they really are. physical bodies, right? you should add that at the top of the list. second, we know that booker t. fuzzygton supported versus ferguson, the u.s. supreme court case that established separate but equal in american society -- second,

we know that booker t. washington supported plessy vs. u.s. supreme court case that established separate but equal in american society. booker t. washington was summoned and asked to testify vs. congress about plessy ferguson, and he gave his blessing, you might say, to a kind of separate but equal arena and separate but equal policies. this involve, of course, education, but then spilled over into other areas of life for people of african descent. andwashington believed -- we come to his defense -- washington believed that whites were in factt, who trying their best not only to limit like participation, but to get rid of black people.

ku klux klan remember. washington believed people of this kind would never accept onple of african descent equal footing in their surprise. washington believed the key to independence for african-americans was undergirded by them building up their own communities. so he had no problems with separate but equal. plessy vs. is, ferguson turned out to be unequal because public funding, public works, other sorts of things were not equal for black and white society. if you lived in the black part of town versus the white part of town, you did not get the same money spent per student. for

example right here in georgia, anywhere from three to five times the amount of money spent on a black child was spent on a white child as a result of plessy vs. ferguson, so washington gives part of the blame for that. and he is accused of being a racial accommodation a list as well. he is essentially saying here in the latter part of the 19th and early part of the 20th century that it is ok for american society to not only be segregated in all factors of life, but it is also a k for people of african descent --it is also ok for people of african descent not to challenge that will live within the sphere of segregation.

then washington being summoned and asked to appear at the white house for dinner with the president in october of 1901, of then being the adviser -- course to william howard taft and via roosevelt. this was important because it led to the establishment of a federal council for negro affairs. and an air to washington for legacy through the hbcu's. his legacy is great and i still believe he is the man. many of you argue he is not. now, to your arguments. >> i acknowledge that booker t. washington made extraordinary contributions to the black immunity. he is the man. he is cool and all, but martin

luther king jr. was more influential in terms of overall industry as a race leader because booker t. washington said we are just going to sit calmly and except the situation. martin luther king worked for equality and for change. not just for black people. he worked for better standards of living for everyone in america and booker t. washington seems very intent on pursuing a personal agenda and elevating his status in politics. martin luther king accomplished everything he did without an official office. >> he is just better, right? >> he is also better because you are saying booker t. washington was the first, the only to be appointed to an office, but that does not make him the man overall because if you asked someone in the country whether they are 16 or 60 who the preeminent symbol of racial

equality is, martin luther king is the answer they come up with and that legacy holds more weight than any official appointments. >> ok, all right. who agrees with her? do you agree? do you agree? all right. what do you have to say? >> [indiscernible] >> let you think for a minute and come back, right? yes? >> [indiscernible] choice, like -- you know, how you say he is like a racial accommodation list. theduring that time, it is height of the kkk and he is in the deep south. it would be hard for him to go have any- did he choice other than to be a racial accommodation list at the time? he probably would have been killed before he had a time to fight.

>> he would have most certainly not have lived a life as long as he did. he died when he was 59 years old. in 1915, that was a pretty long time. due to the life expectancy. but had he said, well, enough of segregation. we are going to march towards freedom and that sort of thing -- it would not have lived very long. , he was in alabama, one of the most racist, oppressive states in the south. not only is he in alabama, but he is in rural alabama. even today, tuskegee university a magnificent institution, but it is not in a real, what we call, urban center. and during the era during which booker t. washington came into

power as the head of tuskegee institute in 1881, tuskegee was area. a very small rural very remote. he tells us that -- what tuskegee was like in "up from slavery." i have often thought, what was life like really for booker t. washington? what kind of things did he see go on in alabama? --magine he did not see it even if he did not see it, he knew black people were being lynched. that houses, churches and stuff or being burned. there is a lot of violence against people of african descent. part of his racial accommodation had to do, note only with his own self-preservation, but also the sense that people of african going to come

through this thing, segregation and all that and make the impact of become more independent people, we are not going to be in yourdo it with a gun hand. that is just not going to work. now that is part of the same argument that martin luther king nonviolentms of the demonstrations in the south, you see. not only did king feel it was morally wrong to sink to the level of the oppressor. because they are killing you, you do not have to kill them back -- shoo back at them. you have to rise to a higher moral standard. but king said another reason why i am against violence is we can't win. just look at it. practically, we can't win. we can't win a war. 1920's, in fact, tulsa, oklahoma, and aereo -- an

area with the national negro business league, it was known across the country as black wall street. there was a race riot because a young black man had been accused of wanting to rape a white woman in an elevator in a hotel. a race riot broke out and the u.s. military, air force bombed that part of tulsa, oklahoma from the air. so, i mean -- there was a reason to feel. this was after booker t. washington died. but martin luther king, he was aware of that, that happening in tulsa, oklahoma. aware of washington is the atrocities happening in the black community at the hands of white racists.

so, i think both of them are saying violence and confrontation is not the answer. the answer. of course course, king takes it to another level as well. nonviolence ases a moral force that ultimately exposes the weakness and the inhumanity of those who perpetrate violence. you are intent on not using violence and you face folks who do, and they continue andse violence, you don't you maintain your dignity, who looks bad? that was king's points. in one sense, maybe booker t. washington did not have much of a choice, in the same way martin

luther king felt he did not have a choice. hand, the sense of the racial accommodationist, that is what is really problematic. dubois hated that about booker t. washington. another leader would follow washington around wherever he was going to speak. he would find were that was going to be and make arrangements so he could sit right in the front. and everything went fine. the singing and other kinds of things, until they introduced booker t. washington, and the minute they introduced washington, he got up and started shouting him down. washington had great opposition from significant people of african descent. uboisugh he and w.e.b. d never had a public argument.

this is a misnomer. this is a policy. you read all the stuff about dubois and washington at each other's throats and all that. made to go public statements about washington. one was a chapter in "the souls very balanced" a critique of mr. washington. and the second one was after duboiston died, we.e.b. wrote a eulogy for booker t. washington and published it in a major newspaper. those are the only two public s ever madethat duboi about washington and washington only mentioned dubois a couple times. once in "up from slavery" where he is and austen and he says,

there is a young man with an interesting analysis and paper -- where he is in boston and he says, there is a young man with an interesting analysis and paper that he read. they were two different generations, etc. is criticizing washington, but washington is attempting to build institutions. this is really what is his legacy. this is what distinguishes him from any other black leader, including martin luther king. martin luther king jr., dr. king was a tremendous leader, no question about it. we do not think of the world in the same way prior to martin luther king that we think to the world now. the firsther king was in the history of the world to say war was wrong, for example. no one had ever said that before. even jesus said we will have wars and rumors of wars. dr. king said war is evil.

it destroys communities. it destroys people. it destroys civilization. it destroys the land. it is a corruption of natural law. he said war is wrong. and we do just not think about -- we just do not think about wore the same way now as we thought about it before dr. king put down that analysis. he changed the perspective. how about that? and the power of nonviolence. we think of that differently after dr. king. in india had established the paradigm for nonviolence, but it was dr. king who brought awarenessrnational through the civil rights movement. times,lived during the they lived during those ages. we cannot take them out of those ages and put them somewhere else. ok, you do not like booker t. is angton because he

racial accommodationist, something like that. you have to look at the context where he is doing this. your question is very, very appropriate. maybe he did not have the kind of options we think he ought have had to talk about racial accommodationist. i do think washington honestly did believe it was better for people of african descent to accept and work within the arena to spendation then their effort challenging it -- than to spend their effort challenging it. his writings and know enough about his life that i honestly believe washington thought it was better for people of african descent to simply build up their own communities. if they build up their own communities, establish an economic base, the walls of

segregation might come down. and if they don't come down, who cares? because then we will have our own. that is a washington felt. who cares if folks like you or don't like you if they don't sign your check? this was washington from mike. who cares if they do not let us into their universities if our universities are on par? thatares if they live on side of town if we have nice houses on this side of town? washington federal argument is, don't worry about all that, what is going on on that side of town. build up on this side of town. yes? >> [indiscernible] where washington was talking about how originally he felt when an individual made a oftement in favor segregation or racism of any type, it would anger him, but he reached a point in his life or he would ignore it, because he came to realize that eventually

racial equality would be a reality and those individuals would be standing on the train tracks when the train was coming down the line. i guess my question is, do you think washington foresaw the increase in the number of pro-african-american civil -- through world war i and world war ii and the civil rights movement? >> i do not know if you foresaw it. he laid the groundwork for. i do know that he laid the groundwork for a number of organizations that develop later on, like the congress of racial equality, urban league, all of that had direct relations to booker t. washington's legacy and the national negro business

league. especially the urban league. the linkage is clear. leagueional urban claimed some heritage to booker t. washington. yes,n that respect, washington did lay the groundwork that later on other organizations, civil rights organizations claimed his legacy. garvey, who was the leader of the back to africa movement, claimed direct lineage from booker t. washington. social lineage. he was not related to him by blood, but in terms of the intellect, these social activism tradition, he saw himself as carrying the legacy of booker t. washington.

he admired him. he thought he was the greatest man alive. everywhere he went, he carried a copy of "up from slavery." he came to america to work with booker t. washington, but by the time he got here, washington was dead. he said, ok, washington is dead. who i talk to now about this race thing? people said, the man now is w.e.b. dubois. he met dubois. he got turned off. if you know anything about him, you understand how he got turned off. he was a great man, but not great socially. he was a pretty uppity fellow. this manrvey said, cannot be a race leader. he does not look right. he has light skin, hazel eyes. started the unia and

claimed direct lineage to booker t. washington and later on the nation of islam, that is an and error of the garvey movement -- itor of the garvey movement, saw themselves having a relationship to booker t. washington. and elijah mohammed, the founder of the nation of islam, often quoted booker t. washington. strain of thought called black nationalism. the problem is when the nationalists fought, you have to say, ok, how are you nation -- how are you a nation?

you have to have land. washington felt that he could solve this problem because he actually went to congress and asked there be state set aside. cleared witht it the president and congress, there could be state set aside for black americans to migrate to and established their own communities, their own states, that sort of thing. washington said we need to have true black nationalism. not this, you go live on the other side of town. we will have our own states. the problem was, these were undesirable for people of african descent, places like montana and the upper great plains. too cold, too barren, and all of that. , african-american leaders and others were not desirous of separating out and going to states where there would only be black people of

african descent, or the great majority of african descent, because they felt that would make it easy to get rid of black folks. genocide would be easy. tulsa,d already bombed oklahoma. how easy would it be if 90% of black people lived in the upper great plains? get up on a plane with some bombs, go on up there and get rid of black folks. what did happen as a result of booker t. washington that i did not put on the powerpoint, there was a summit of all-black towns that was an offshoot of this movement.t he gave the commencement address at the university of nebraska-lincoln, in which he advocated the settlement of all-black towns. by this time he had given up on the notion of all-black states.

he was advocating all-black towns. as a result of washington's trek through the upper south, midwest, and great plains, there were all-black towns that were developed. and partly as a result of booker t. washington's legacy. for example, in nebraska, there were four or five all-black towns. there are four all-black towns in oklahoma. oklahoma still has all-black towns. bully oklahoma -- bully, oklahoma. two of like towns. texas had some all-black towns, etc. washington's legacy was let's have our own towns. yes. >> black business, negro business league, what happened

to it? i went to a local community called pleasant hill. a lady was giving a history lesson about how in the past, all these black leaders, doctors, and lawyers in a community. if you look around at the community, you will see those houses that were nice in the early 1900's, they are not in mint condition anymore. they are just poor. you said the national negro business league funded those black communities and towns headed by booker t. washington, so what happened to it? >> integration. when integration came, many blacks found it more attractive to live, work, spend money in predominantly white communities instead of their own.

student coming out of junior high school into high school when integration supposedly happened. in the community in which i lived, it did not happen. but i remember the discourse. i remember the discussions about that. the whole question of integration and what has happened within african-american communities. one thing that has happened has been the ghettoizing a black communities because those who are more economically and leftically upwardly mobile black communities. so black communities were robbed of resources, its primary source, which was people. doctors, lawyers, professors, teachers, etc., left the historic black communities and

moved into more integrated areas. a lot of times, for very good reasons. they could get better housing, nicer neighborhoods, nicer stores, better schools, all that sort of thing. but the fallacy in integration was that many people of african descent did not support integration simply to live amongst whites. they saw that as a means to an end, which was the quality. the philosophy behind integration was if we move over there with the white people, go to their schools and all of that, we will be able to share in those resources. in a practical way, if you are sitting in a classroom, black student anyway classroom -- in predominately white classes, the teacher gets up to teach, the teacher cannot

teach the white kids without teaching the black one. if books are handed out, that black kid is going to get a new textbook, too. whatever resources that are going to be handed out and available, the black people will have access to those resources in integration. you see? that was the theory behind integration. it did not quite work that way necessarily. but that was the theory behind integration. it was a means to an end instead of an end to itself. don't have to sit at a lunch counter next to somebody white, but the fact is that particular restaurant in the white neighborhoods have better cuts of meat. the people are being paid a little more. the structure is better, the neighborhood, and all that. there, we have

access to those resources. it is all about resources. not so much about black people who did not feel comfortable around other black people. it is about accessing resources. but in that move to somehow improve the conditions of people of african dissent through resources over here, lack of resources over here. let's go where the resources are. doing that, the intelligentsia, the most economically viable a black communities -- a black communities pulled out and went across town. that left the black community increasingly ghettoized, and that is why you see the situation as it is today. over generations, that has occurred. i have seen it in my own life.

>> the fact they integrated with the whites, why did that affect the national negro is ms. lake still keeping its promise -- business league still keeping its promise in the black communities? became part ofon the national urban league. that is an organization that has spurred black businesses and that sort of thing. that organization did not end its work in african-american communities. part of the problem is black businesses tend not to have resources to start up. most businesses in america fail within the first three years. anytime you're trying to start a business in america, and i know because i had a little business at one time, a mental health center, and went through the

small business administration. you need money. i went through the training. us, i was iny told a room with 20 other people trying to start up stuff. if you are going to start a business, you need to have three to five years of cash money in terms of operating money. you need to have that set aside. don't touch it. don't expect your business to even pay your salary, much less turn a profit for the first three to five years. most black businesses can't do that. people start on a shoestring. ,f they run into problems usually within six to nine months, a lot of businesses are closing in the black community because they cannot sustain that period where you don't get a check. that has a lot to do with it as

well. yes. degree whato some she was talking about, the breakdown of the black community, can be attributed the philosophy of gritty washington had -- booker t. washington had. i remember a passage where he said the black communities could be seen -- to be seen as equal had to prove the rest of the community could not survive without them. you are perpetuating this idea i am not equal because i am human, i am only equal because i work really hard. the integration happened. some affluent white people probably felt like this is my time to shine and prove that i am useful so they moved as a community. such af he was not racial accommodationist early, those structures that were successful could have maintained and stayed because they were

already in the mindset that we are equal as we are. he did not teach that, but martin luther king did. >> [laughter] washingtonooker t. was the most influential, powerful black american that has not been elected to office, i don't mean to say that i agree with him. there is a lot about booker t. washington i don't like, i don't agree. washington was in a position after 1900 to say a nay to thingsh or people of african american descent were trying to get started that were supported by settlement funds. i've spoken with older african-americans and older whites who were trying to participate in this racial uplifting movement, who were

starting schools or businesses or anything such as that. many said in order to get it started, they knew they had to get washington on board. so they wrote a letter to booker t. washington or talk to someone who knew, had access to booker t. washington. as long as he did not speak ok.nst, you were if you had a job, if you got a job that was being funded by the state or federal government and you came out against washington or washington's program, you would find yourself unemployed. so i don't agree necessarily with washington because he did become kind of a demagogue after that. no question about that. charged martin luther king was that way, that he thought he was the lord, that kind of stuff.

folks would call him "the lord," etc. anytime a person achieves that sort of status, they will have detractors and haters. martin luther king was a tremendous national and international figure. no question about that. life is different for us because andr. king's leadership what that movement was able to do, the civil rights movement. but life is also different because of what booker t. washington was able to do. martin luther king even credited booker t. washington with some of the successes of the early parts of the civil rights movement because some of the civil rights movement was also economic justice. later on when dr. king was , the march on washington was to march 250,000

people to washington, d.c., and bring the united states government to a halt. lay down on runways so planes could not take off, and that kind of stuff. just literally a huge act of civil disobedience. the demand was everyone in america be guaranteed a minimum livable wage. was what the king movement, the civil rights movement ultimately ended at that point of saying we must have economic justice and there should be a guaranteed salary. no matter whether you are flipping hamburgers or lecturing before c-span. [laughter] there ought to be a guaranteed minimum salary for everybody in america. smacks ofook at that,

booker t. in there somewhere. build on the successes and failures of those who have come before them. i still think i won this argument myself. you probably think you won, and that is ok. that is fine. i believe we have a tremendous historical dynamic period in american history for people of african descent, so much so that we have in terms of a legacy of booker t. washington, we have many things in american society. many folks look at booker t. washington as a tremendous figure. even the president of the united states, president barack obama has paid tribute to booker t. washington. and also martin luther king.

when i look at these two great leaders, i say there is something about each one of them that contributed significantly to black progress for people of african descent. there are things about both of them also that we could criticize. martin luther king may have stayed with the nonviolence thing too long some people say. later in his life, he questioned whether or not nonviolence could societyan unethical because the premise of nonviolence is sooner or later the folks who are pressing you will get embarrassed or something. feel like we are making ourselves look bad. what if the folks who are oppressing you don't have that kind of humanity? some folks don't have shame. if you are trying to shame someone who does not have any shame, you are in trouble.

king ultimately came to that point and questioned that. read his books. at one point, martin luther king questioned, can nonviolence work? this was after he went to chicago. the kind of structures in chicago were not the same as in the south. in the south, especially the south,- the deep together more than three or four black people together you, you disrupted the fabric of the society. there were laws against black assembly. marchedto chicago and right through skokie illinois. did not bother anybody because in chicago, people do that stuff all the time. black folk walking down the street together and that kind of thing.

just by the very presence of 500 black people marching, it did not necessarily bother anyone in an urban city in the north. so there were things about dr. king and his perspective in the movement that fell short, no question about that. but nonetheless, we experience a better life because what he did. we experience a better life because of what booker t. washington did. if i could talk to booker t. washington now, have a conversation with him, i think i would argue with him about a lot of stuff. no question about that. but i also salute the fact he was the man. no question about it. he was the man. ok? one last question or comment? yes. either thesay he was

most powerful or influential. i will give you he was the most powerful because of his appointed office and martin luther king was the most influential. >> it is hard to make a distinction between powerful and influential. it depends on the basis which you are looking, you see. what i am saying is martin luther king, no question about it, had a great amount of influence. passing the civil rights act, desegregation of the south, that sort of thing. no question about it. the whole question of war, calling into question war, which led my generation to say we are not going to vietnam. i refused to go and i was ready to go to jail. turns out i did not have to go to jail because of the draft at the time.

so dr. king was very influential, no question about it. what i am looking at in terms of institution building, the legacy you leave, dr. king's legacy is different than booker t. washington's legacy. dr. king's legacy is of a society that operates differently. blacks and whites sitting in the same classroom, going to eat together, doing things together, dating each other, growing up together. that would not have been possible without the civil rights movement. no question about that. but when you look at the kind of legacy of booker t. washington who believed institutions are reality and the opportunities for people, and booker t. washington is the only black leader, social leader, that left institutions. no other one.

not even martin luther king left institutions. .e left an organization the conference can't get along with each other. can't getd the naacp it together, fussing and fighting. but look at booker t. washington. still over 80% of black folks are educated. still where seven or eight out of every 10 doctors and lawyers are still being educated at hbcu's. that kind of like leadership and intelligentsia coming out of hbc , and a lot of that had to do with booker t. washington's support financially sending money their way so they could survive and all of that. you have legacies in different ways.

we have one institutional legacy and another in terms of transforming american society in terms of resources and opportunities. we will continue with this argument throughout the semester i am sure, and ultimately i will when. -- i will win. [laughter] thank you so much. [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2014] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. visit ncicap.org] >> join us each saturday evening for classroom lectures from across the country on different topics and eras of american history. lectures are also available as podcasts. or downloadbsite from itunes. next, author and professor richard hill describes the history of native american

treaties. he explains the nature of treaty making and the rituals and artifacts that help bind treaties between native americans and the federal government. he also discusses how those trees have suffered in the last century. this event is a portion of the symposium hosted by the national museum of the american indian in washington, d.c. it is about 40 minutes. >> richard hill is senior coordinator in ontario. 1995, rickntil served as the assistant director for public programs and as the special assistant to the director of the national museum of american indians. he has lectured and written extensively on placing native american art, history, and

culture in its proper context as well as on american indian museum issues such as tribal consultation, repatriation, stereotyping, and cross-cultural education. please join me in giving a warm rick hill.retail -- [applause] >> it is great to be here. i gave tim his first job in the museum when he was much younger. i wanted to see what he made of himself, not that i did not believe he could. the way seneca's greet one another, it means i am thankful that you are well. that applies to all of you. the concept of wellness also means you are at peace. wellness and peace are at the heart of our cultural aspirations for treaak